Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:46:02.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrigendum: A certain structure of Artin groups and the isomorphism conjecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2024

S.K. Roushon*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Tata Institute, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this note, we give an alternate proof of the Farrell–Jones isomorphism conjecture for the affine Artin groups of type $\widetilde B_n$.

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Mathematical Society

In [Reference Flechsig4], Flechsig pointed out an error in [Reference Roushon6, Proposition 4.1], which was needed to deduce the Farrell–Jones isomorphism conjecture for the affine Artin groups ${\cal A}_{\widetilde B_n}$ ( $n\geq 3$ ) of type ${\widetilde B}_n$ .

In this note, we give an alternate argument to prove the conjecture.

Theorem 0.1 The Farrell–Jones isomorphism conjecture wreath product with finite groups ( $FICwF$ ) is true for ${\cal A}_{\widetilde B_n}$ ( $n\geq 3$ ).

Proof Consider the following hyperplane arrangement complement.

$$ \begin{align*} W=\{w\in{\Bbb C}^n\ |\ w_i\neq \pm w_j,\ \text{for all}\ i\neq j; w_k\neq \pm 1,\ \text{for all}\ k\}. \end{align*} $$

In [Reference Callegaro, Moroni and Salvetti2, Section 3], the following homeomorphism was observed. Let ${\Bbb C}^*={\Bbb C}-\{0\}$ .

$$ \begin{align*} {\Bbb C}^*\times W&\simeq X:=\{x\in{\Bbb C}^{n+1}\ |\ x_i\neq \pm x_j,\ \text{for all}\ i\neq j; x_1\neq 0\}.\\&(\lambda, w_1,w_2,\ldots, w_n)\mapsto (\lambda, \lambda w_1,\ldots, \lambda w_n).\end{align*} $$

In [Reference Callegaro, Moroni and Salvetti2, Lemma 3.1], it was then proved that the hyperplane arrangement complement X is simplicial, in the sense of [Reference Deligne3].

From [Reference Huang and Osajda5], it follows that $FICwF$ is true for $\pi _1(X)$ , since X is a finite real simplicial arrangement complement. Hence, $FICwF$ is true for $\pi _1(W)$ , as $\pi _1(W)$ is a subgroup of $\pi _1(X)$ and $FICwF$ has hereditary property (see [Reference Roushon6]).

Next, note that there are the following two finite sheeted orbifold covering maps:

$$ \begin{align*}W\to &PB_n(Z):=\{z\in Z^n\ |\ z_i\neq z_j,\ \text{for all}\ i\neq j\}\\&(w_1,w_2,\ldots, w_n)\mapsto (w_1^2,w_2^2,\ldots, w_n^2) \end{align*} $$

and $PB_n(Z)\to B_n(Z):=PB_n(Z)/S_n$ . Here, $Z={\Bbb C}(1,1;2)$ (see [Reference Roushon6]) is the orbifold whose underlying space is ${\Bbb C}-\{1\}$ , and $0$ is an order $2$ cone point. And, the symmetric group $S_n$ is acting on $PB_n(Z)$ by permuting coordinates.

Therefore, $\pi _1(W)$ embeds in $\pi _1^{orb}(B_n(Z))$ as a finite index subgroup. Hence, $FICwF$ is true for $\pi _1^{orb}(B_n(Z))$ , since $FICwF$ passes to finite index overgroups (see [Reference Roushon6]). Next, recall that in [Reference Allcock1] Allcock showed that ${\cal A}_{\widetilde B_n}$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $\pi _1^{orb}(B_n(Z))$ , and hence $FICwF$ is true for ${\cal A}_{\widetilde B_n}$ by the hereditary property of $FICwF$ .

References

Allcock, D., Braid pictures of Artin groups . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354(2002), no. 9, 34553474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callegaro, F., Moroni, D., and Salvetti, M., The $K\left(\pi, 1\right)$ problem for the affine Artin group of type ${\widetilde{B}}_n$ and its cohomology . J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 12(2010), 122.Google Scholar
Deligne, P., Les immeubles des groupes de tresses généralisés . Invent. Math. 17(1972), 273302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flechsig, J., Braid groups and mapping class groups for 2-orbifolds. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2305.04273.Google Scholar
Huang, J. and Osajda, D., Helly meets Garside and Artin . Invent. Math. 225(2021), no. 2, 395426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roushon, S. K., A certain structure of Artin groups and the isomorphism conjecture . Canad. J. Math. 73(2021), no. 4, 11531170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar