Introduction
The correct assessment of hydrogen-ion activity is critical to understanding the detailed chemistry of glacial melt water. Evaluations of weathering reaction paths and clay-mineral assemblages using thermodynamic stability diagrams, such as Reference DreverDrever (1982, p.175) has presented, are incorrect if input pH values are unrepresentative. Representative values of p(CO2) and pH are crucial inputs to modern (Reference HalletHallet, 1976, p.1007; Reference Hallet, Hallet, Lorrain and SouchezHallet and others, 1978, p.318) models of subglacial precipitation and ice formation during regelation sliding at the glacier bed. pH values “contaminated” by CO2 in Arctic ice melt are a significant error in studies of acid snow (Reference Koerner and FisherKoerner and Fisher, 1982, p.138); measurements of samples subjected to differing times and temperatures of ice melt will show pH variations induced by varying amounts of CO2 transfer.
Early glacial melt-water pH work was conducted in laboratories months after samples had been collected (Reference Rainwater and GuyRainwater and Guy, 1961; Reference Keller and ReesmanKeller and Reesman, 1963). Reference SlattSlatt (1972) showed that major solute changes can occur during such storage. Reference EkEk (1964, Reference Ek1966) and Reference MetcalfMetcalf (unpublished, Reference Metcalf1979) suggested that summer melt waters can be greatly undersaturated with respect to atmospheric CO2, and that laboratory pH values can change significantly from in situ measurements for the same water sample. The present study was undertaken to discover the cause of the cited discrepancies between laboratory and field measurements, and to develop a reliable field method for routine determination of pH in glacial melt waters, using commonly available equipment.
Method
Three buffer solutions of pH 4, 7, and 10 are cooled to the sampling temperature in an ice-water bath, or the glacial stream, in order to perform the “span” calibration (testing the slope in millivolts per pH unit between three points of known pH).
After the buffer solutions are sufficiently cool, the temperature compensation dial of the pH meter is adjusted to the measured sample temperature. This adjustment compensates for the lowered voltage output per pH unit with decreasing temperature (decreasing “slope”) described by Westcott (1978, p.25). Temperature is measured with a digital thermometer (precision = 0.1 deg), calibrated in the ice-water bath, before buffer rinsing, at 0.0°C.
A minimum period of ten minutes should be allowed for a nearly complete electrode response before any instrumental adjustment to a buffer solution is attempted. If the “span” calibration shows a deviation of more than about 0.05 pH units between actual and measured pH for the pH 4 and 10 buffers, there is a fault with the electrode or instrument.
CO2 gas transfer between the sample and the atmosphere may begin immediately upon collection, so that collecting and transporting time should be minimized to one or two minutes. Immediately upon collection, water samples are filtered with two, stacked, cellulose filters held in a “Perspex” (polymethyl methacrylate) cylinder, driven by a bicycle tyre pump, as described by Reference CollinsCollins (1981, p.222–23). Glass fibre filters were avoided because Reference Jackson and InchJackson and Inch (1980, p.30) have shown that some types contribute significant sodium and titration alkalinity to a filtered sample.
Samples are filtered into 0.25 dm3 polyethylene beakers and placed in the ice-water bath at 0°C. During summer pH measurements, the sample is shaded from solar heating and insulated by closed-cell foam. Direct sunlight can quickly heat summer samples in the bath to the unacceptable range of 4–10°C. As the sample heats, CO2 solubility decreases, and outgassing of CO2 from a previously undersaturated (at 0°C) sample can occur. Figure 1 documents this effect during a d(pH)/dt experiment on Gornergletscher melt water from 29 July 1981. It shows a pH reversal from CO2 outgassing, correlated with an increase of sample temperature and visual confirmation of gas bubbles leaving the sample. Such reversals were observed only when samples were heated above 3 or 4°C, which is the upper limit of acceptable sample temperature in the ice-water bath.
Both the thermometer and pH probes are placed in the bottom of the beaker simultaneously, in a position where they cannot move. Measurements take place in the beaker bottom water, in the least susceptible location to gas and heat exchange with the atmosphere. A probe located in this position yields the closest approximation to in situ pH values if CO2 gas transfer takes place in a sample. These measurements can, however, be subject to substantial delay in reaching equilibrium pH values with the atmosphere due to the time necessary for CO2 to diffuse from the water surface to the electrode, and resulting from the density circulation induced by surface-water heating from near 0 to 4°C. Proper probe placement also avoids two sources of pH signal noise in dilute water samples (Reference WestcottWestcott, 1978, p.102, 129); (1) changes in the liquid-junction potential from stirring, and (2) the great increase in electrode resistance with decrease of sample temperature (nearly doubling the resistance for every 7 deg lowered). Such noise, caused by convection currents initiated during insertion and removal of the temperature probe, is unacceptable (see Fig. 2). During May 1981 field experiments at the terminus of Gornergletscher, noise caused by slight electrode movements from the air blast and ground vibration of nearby avalanches was often noted as a small, superposed anomaly on the variation of pH signal with time. Figure 2 shows this effect to have been more significant than noise from thermometer insertion during the d(pH)/dt experiment of 14 May 1981.
A standard combination electrode, with saturated KCl solution (about 4 mol/dm3), was connected by shielded cable to a high-input-impedance digital pH meter. KCl leakage had negligible effect on pH during field experiments lasting 4 h. Laboratory experiments showed KCl leakage of 0.3–1.2 mg d−1 in de-ionized, double-distilled water purged of CO2 with Ar. Precipitation of silver chloride complexes on the internal reference electrode and near the liquid junction, from low-temperature operation, did not noticeably affect performance in standard buffers. The saturated KCl filling solution freezes at −11°C; the electrode must be protected from freezing in most winter conditions while not in use. Volume expansion of the filling solution upon freezing threatens the integrity of the glass electrode-liquid junction, which is critical to proper electrode response. At first during field operations, body heat was used to keep the electrode as warm as possible, thinking this would accelerate electrode response once it was placed in the sample. Experiments showed this logic to be wrong. For optimum response time, the sample and electrode must be in thermal equilibrium (Reference WestcottWestcott, 1978, p.101).
pH measurements and water temperature are observed continuously until the electrode reaches equilibrium. Although not strictly correct, a convenient operational definition for pH equilibrium is when no pH changes (less than 0.01 pH unit) are observed in 20 min. Replicate samples showed this procedure produced a mean error of less than −0.04 pH units.
The electrode response to 99% of the equilibrium pH normally takes from 6 to 30 min in the field at 0°C, but appears strongly affected by variations in sample buffer capacity and the degree of saturation with respect to atmospheric p(CO2). Definitive experiments to understand this effect have not been made, but some work is currently in progress. Preliminary results suggest that samples with low buffer capacity which are greatly undersaturated, or over-saturated, with respect to atmospheric p(CO2) approach equilibrium pH values faster than samples in equilibrium with atmospheric p(CO2).
Typical laboratory response curves for one pH electrode tested in standard buffer solutions at 0°C are shown in Figure 3. The exponential approach to an equilibrium pH value is readily apparent, especially the increasing time delay for additional pH changes after 90% of the equilibrium response has been reached in less than 10 min.
For high precision d(pH)/dt analysis of CO2 gas transfer in samples, field chart recorders lacked sufficient sensitivity over the wide pH and time scales needed. Instead, hand recording of pH to 0.01 pH unit and elapsed time to ± 1 s in 4 h with a digital stopwatch was employed.
Complications From Field Conditions
CO2 gas transfer
If an adequately filtered water sample is measured at the in situ temperature and atmospheric pressure, the major source of pH drift, or error, comes from CO2 gas entering or leaving the sample while approaching equilibrium with atmospheric CO2. Ek (1964, p.140) and Reference MetcalfMetcalf (unpublished; 1979, p.235) used pH and titration alkalinity, and pH and carbonate saturometer measurements, respectively, to show that summer melt waters were often severely undersaturated (by one to two orders of magnitude) with respect to atmospheric p(CO)2. Reference Weiss, Weiss, Bucher, Oeschger and CraigWeiss and others (1972), Reference Stauffer and BernerStauffer and Berner (1978), and Reference BernerBerner (1979) have shown with highly sensitive gas chromatography that Swiss glacier ice is progressively depleted in total CO2 content towards the glacier terminus. As Reference HalletHallet (1976, p.1005) noted, melt water from such ice will be significantly undersaturated with respect to atmospheric CO2. If all of the CO2 contained in “temperate” ice remains in the melt water (rather than some escaping to the atmosphere as bubbles are opened) upon melting, it is usually about ten times less than the concentration of aqueous CO2 needed to be in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2 partial pressures, based on the gas chromatographic measurements mentioned above (Fig. 4). Additionally, Reference Harrison and RaymondHarrison and Raymond (1976) have demonstrated that the electrical conductivity of Blue Glacier ice melt is significantly less than the conductivity to be expected if the melt was in equilibrium with atmospheric p(CO2) at 0° C.
Figure 5 shows an example of the pH changes associated with CO2 gas uptake by a supraglacial ice-melt stream sample at in situ pressure and temperature. Change of pH with time, temperature, and titration alkalinity were measured in the field at Gornergletscher, Switzerland, during 7 August 1981. An iterative computer calculation available from the author, assuming constant alkalinity during CO2 uptake, was employed to back-calculate CO2 partial pressures from the carbonate equilibria equations. This approximation was verified by comparison with atmospheric p(CO2) at equilibrium pH, and with a replicate analysis after the solution had reached equilibrium (Fig. 5). A second crucial assumption that CO2-species control the pH of the tested sample has been verified by W.E. Reference GordonGordon (personal communication in 1982). Reference GordonGordon (1979; Reference Gordon1982) has described the computational procedure used to evaluate pka values, and species concentrations participating in acid-base titrations in solutions of unknown composition. His analysis of the field titration alkalinity data confirmed that the alkalinity is in the form of (61±2, 59±3 µmol dm−3), the free acid is CO2, and the measured pKa value for the H2CO3/ conjugate pair is about 6.3. Details of the p(CO2) calculation procedure are lengthy, and are presented elsewhere (Reference Metcalf, Brutsaert and JirkaMetcalf, in press).
The general trend of decreasing pH with time observed in Figure 5 can only be explained by an acid addition or base removal from the solution. Base removal is discounted as no precipitation was observed. Three serpentinite grains 3–5 µm across were found in the beaker after the experiment, but these contain no minerals commonly forming acids so quickly in such water. The only plausible explanation is acid addition from CO2 transfer from the air. A measurement with an electrode sensitive to CO2 qualitatively confirmed this argument.
A further proof that the pH change observed is caused by CO2 transfer across the air-water interface is that an approximate first-order reaction rate may be calculated by using least-squares fits of the exponential d(pH)/dt curves, such as given in Figure 5 or 2. The nature of the process assures that the transfer rate must be the same during CO2 gas uptake or outgassing, so that Figures 2 and 5 should yield rate constants of identical magnitude, within experimental errors. Figure 2 yields a rate constant of 1.85 × 10−4 s−1 (n = 57, r = 0.963) and Figure 5 yields a rate constant of −2.95 × 10−4 s−1 (n = 199, r = 0.822). Temperatures varied from 0.8 – 1.9°C during these experiments, and water purity is shown by titration alkalinities of 300 and 60 µmol dm−3, respectively. The laboratory value for the CO2 gas transfer constant from distilled water at 0°C has been given by Reference BohrBohr (1899, p.512) as 2.60 × 10−4 s−1 after 120 min. The accuracy of Reference BohrBohr’s (1899) experiments may be appreciated when one realizes that present CO2 solubility constants are derived from his measurements (Reference Stümm and MorganStümm and Morgan, 1981, p. 204). Also, the ratio of surface area to volume for the solution is about equal to that for the present study (0.14 cm−1), and Reference BohrBohr’s (1899) work (0.21 cm−1), so transfer rates are directly comparable.
Concurrent with the d(pH)/dt data taken in Figure 2, hundreds of gas bubbles, 10 to 16 mm across, appeared and travelled a curved path of 25 – 30 cm upward in 0.2 – 0.45 s as they left the glacier terminus, in non-turbulent flowing waters of 0.1 – 0.2 m3 s−1 discharge and 0.3 – 0.5 m s−1 velocity (Metcalf, in press). These bubbles are considered proof of outgassing in these otherwise quiet waters. The increase of pH with time shown in Figure 2 is therefore interpreted as CO2 outgassing. pH experiments showing identical d(pH)/dt curves for two to five separate samples seem unlikely to originate from the same amount of rock weathering going on in each separate sample, although that is possible. Finally, the qualitative trend of CO2 outgassing was observed using an electrode sensitive to CO2, which is protected from interference from rock-weathering solutes by a gas-permeable membrane separating it from the sample.
For the reasons above, it is proposed here that CO2 gas transfer is the primary reason for the more acid laboratory pH values usually measured in summer melt waters compared with field values (Reference EkEk, 1964; Reference Ek1966; Reference SlattSlatt, unpublished). One cannot quantitatively predict the size of pH change that will occur unless the CO2 gas saturation and titration alkalinity at the time of sampling are known. Since melt water has many different origins, travel paths, and consequent cumulative erosional histories, CO2 gas saturation and the magnitude of pH changes after sampling would be expected to vary widely, as is observed. Unfortunately, any unfiltered colloidal rock particles may contribute to sample pH, masking pH changes caused by CO2. Thus, there is no simple correction for laboratory-measured pH values; they are considered unrepresentative of the in situ water chemistry.
Suspended sediment
The present study has shown that solute enrichment from chemical reactions between glacial melt water and sediment or colloidal minerals will increase sample pH by about 0.1 to 0.3 pH units in unfiltered water, at in situ temperatures and pressures. These complications may be at least partly avoided by adequate filtration at the time of collection.
High suspended sediment concentrations in summer melt-water streams can present problems for electrodes placed directly in the stream. A phenomenon termed “abrasion pH” by Reference Stevens and CarronStevens and Carron (1948) may be observed when charged “ionic shells” on mineral grains influence the electrode from a true pH value. The details of this process may be explained by the large liquid-junction potentials (10 to 100 mV) observed in colloidal suspensions by Reference Jenny, Jenny, Nielsen, Coleman and WilliamsJenny and others (1950). Metcalf (unpublished) found this effect could increase pH by up to 0.4 pH units at Nisqually Glacier, Washington, U.S.A. The “abrasion pH” effect is avoided by making measurements in filtered samples outside the Stream.
Temperature and pressure changes
At 0° C, the error from inadequate temperature compensation is only 0.0037 pH unit per Celsius degree error with a reading 1.0 pH unit from standardization (Reference WestcottWestcott, 1978, p.25). In glacial waters, the main influence on sample pH values of pressure and temperature changes is gas transfer to and from solution - specifically CO2, H2S, and SO2. These volatiles transfer species in equilibrium with H2CO3 and H2SO4, the two acids controlling pH in most glacier ice melt (Reference Koerner and FisherKoerner and Fisher, 1982).
Intrinsic melt-water properties
Numerous studies of CO2 transfer across the air-water interface show that high wind (Reference Hoover and BerkshireHoover and Berkshire, 1969; Reference LissLiss, 1973) or turbulence (Reference KanwisherKanwisher, 1963) will increase the CO2 transfer rate. Reference Reynolds and JohnsonReynolds and Johnson (1972) and Reference MetcalfMetcalf (unpublished, 1979) have observed down-stream alkaline pH changes in proglacial streams from enhanced chemical weathering driven by resupply of atmospheric CO2 into the turbulent water. This natural aeration is very efficient, causing pH increases in pro-glacial streams of 1.0 to 1.8 pH units within 400 m of leaving the glacier terminus.
Water velocity will cause a rather small (about 0.1 – 0.2 pH unit) change in measured pH due to the high liquid-junction potential created (“streaming potential”). However, turbulent stirring promotes faster electrode response and homogenization of the sample. Thus, in winter and early spring, pH measurements may be made directly in the stream, but the previously discussed noise caused by probe movement is a great problem. In summer, the additional problem of suspended sediment makes direct measurement unacceptable. Besides, saltation boulder impacts, and rapid water-level changes greater than the length of the electrode’s short, shielded cable, make instrumental loss probable.
For a constant addition of CO2 to solutions of constant volume, Reference KanwisherKanwisher (1963, p.200) has shown that the change in p(CO2) in equilibrium with a given water sample is much greater for waters of low ionic strength than for waters of high ionic strength. Thus, the purest glacial melt water will show the largest pH changes, for a given CO2 gas saturation, as it approaches equilibrium with the atmosphere, due to its low buffer capacity. This was confirmed by field observation at Gornergletscher in 1981.
Precision of Method
Mean precision for five replicate pairs in the field is −0.04 pH unit with a standard deviation of 0.01 pH unit. This probably includes slight CO2 gas uptake past the operationally defined “20 minute equilibrium end point” because all replicate pairs were slightly more acid, ranging from −0.02 to −0.05 pH units lower for the second sample compared to the first.
Conclusions
Laboratory pH analyses of glacial melt waters are usually very unrepresentative of in situ values and should be discontinued since there is no simple correction that will approximate field values. CO2 gas transfer and solute enrichment from rock particles are the two main sources of error for pH measurements performed at in situ temperatures and pressures. The method described yields final melt-water pH values in equilibrium with atmospheric p(CO2), and is reproducible to within 0.04 pH units. Future work should concentrate on developing hermetically sealed, insulated filtrate containers, which will make gas transfer between the sample and the atmosphere impossible, facilitating stable field pH measurements representative of in situ values.
Acknowledgements
D.N. Collins gave advice throughout this investigation. Discussions with J.W. Glen, W. Stümm, and H. Röthlisberger helped clarify the gas transfer processes described. W.R. Coward, M. Clarke, and P. Appleby provided invaluable technical assistance with field equipment and chemicals. W.E. Gordon graciously supplied unpublished computer analyses of field titration data. A. Bezinge and his colleagues at Grande Dixence, S.A. generously provided laboratory facilities and logistic support at Gornergletscher, Switzerland. This investigation benefited from: an equipment grant from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester, a grant from the Dudley Stamp Memorial Fund of the Royal Society, and support from the “Fees support scheme for overseas research students” administered by the Committee of ViceChancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom. This support is gratefully acknowledged.