Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:38:06.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diversity and metabolic impact of intestinal Lactobacillus species in healthy adults and the elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2011

Jelena Štšepetova*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, University of Tartu, Tartu50411, Estonia
Epp Sepp
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, University of Tartu, Tartu50411, Estonia
Helgi Kolk
Affiliation:
Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Krista Lõivukene
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Microbiology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
Epp Songisepp
Affiliation:
Bio-competence Center of Healthy Dairy Production Limited, Tartu, Estonia
Marika Mikelsaar
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Medical Faculty, University of Tartu, Tartu50411, Estonia
*
*Corresponding author: J. Štšepetova, fax +372 7 374 172, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aimed at assessing the counts and species distribution of intestinal lactobacilli and exploring if the data are associated with BMI and blood glucose level in healthy adults and elderly persons. The BMI (P < 0·01), the level of fasting blood glucose (P < 0·001) and the total counts of lactobacilli (P < 0·01 by bacteriology; P < 0·001 by real-time PCR) were higher in the elderly. The number of species in adults was lower (P < 0·05), who were more often colonised with Lactobacillus acidophilus (P = 0·031) and L. helveticus (P < 0·001). In contrast, L. plantarum (P = 0·035), L. paracasei (P < 0·001) and L. reuteri (P = 0·031) were more prevalent in the elderly. L. rhamnosus was detected in adults (P < 0·001), but not in any elderly person. BMI was associated with counts of lactobacilli, adjusted for age and sex (P = 0·008). The higher BMI in both groups of persons was associated with the presence of obligate homofermentative lactobacilli and L. sakei, both adjusted for age and sex. Plasma glucose values were positively correlated with BMI and negatively correlated with colonisation with L. paracasei (P = 0·0238) in adults and on the borderline with L. fermentum (P = 0·052) in the elderly. Thus, the species-specific PCR analysis of Lactobacillus sp. combined with viable plating data indicates substantial age-related structural differences in the intestinal lactobacilli communities. The higher counts of intestinal Lactobacillus sp. are associated with higher BMI and blood glucose content, while their specific fermentative groups and species of lactobacilli appear at different glucose levels both in adults and in the elderly.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

A host and its microbiota form a tightly linked microbial ecosystem. This has several health consequences that expose differentially during the lifespan. The changes in the bacterial colonisation of the gut and metabolic activities in the colonic ecosystem occur during ageing(Reference Hebuterne1, Reference Tiihonen, Tynkkynen and Ouwehand2). In the elderly, the country-specific increased prevalence and the number of Lactobacillus species during ageing have been assessed(Reference Tiihonen, Tynkkynen and Ouwehand2Reference Silvi, Verdanelli and Orpianesi4).

Lactobacillus sp. belongs to the members of lactic acid bacteria(Reference Heilig, Zoetendal and Vaughan5Reference Vaughan, Heilig and Ben-Amor7) and is phylogenetically included in the division of Firmicutes(Reference Garrity, Bell and Lilburn8). The genus Lactobacillus comprises more than ninety validly described species and some subspecies, while approximately 30 % of them have been isolated from faecal sources(Reference Sghir, Gramet and Saua9) (www.bacterio.cict.fr). The role of lactobacilli has received much attention, especially due to their putative health-promoting properties. Lactobacillus sp. has been shown to contribute to digestion, stimulation of immunity and inhibition of pathogens(Reference Vaughan, Heilig and Ben-Amor7, Reference Hirano, Yoshida and Sugiyama10Reference Walter13). Recently, some studies have reported an association between the presence of intestinal lactobacilli and an impact on metabolism and energy uptake in the host(Reference Cani and Delzenne14).

However, there are a few comparative studies of Lactobacillus species diversity among different ages in adults and elderly groups, either by applying bacteriological methods(Reference Woodmansey, McMurdo and Macfarlane15, Reference Vassos, Maipa and Voidarous16) or by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis with Lactobacillus genus-specific primers(Reference Nielsen, Møller and Rosenfeldt17Reference Cagno, Rizello and Garliardi19). The classical division of lactobacilli has been based on their fermentative characteristics: obligate homofermentative lactobacilli (OHOL); facultative heterofermentative lactobacilli (FHEL); obligate heterofermentative lactobacilli (OHEL)(Reference Kandler, Weiss, Sneath, Mair and Sharpe20). During fermentation of polysaccharides in the colon, the lactobacilli strains of particular species may use different pathways, providing the host with energy differentially. Recent work by the Gordon team has shown that Gram-positive bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum rather than those of Bacteroidetes expressed specific enzymatic activities in obese individuals(Reference Bäckhed, Ding and Wang21). Whether this process is influenced by differences in age, sex and increased body weight has not been elucidated yet.

The aim of the present study was to assess the counts and species distribution of intestinal lactobacilli and to explore if the data of intestinal lactobacilli are associated with BMI and blood glucose level in healthy adults and elderly persons.

Materials and methods

Sampling and processing of samples

The study group comprised twenty-four healthy adults (nine males and fifteen females; age: median 27·0 years (quartiles 23–31·5)) and thirty-seven elderly persons (sixteen males and twenty-one females; age: median 73 years (quartiles 68–75·2)), P < 0·001 (Table 1). The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Tartu (no. 139/16 20.06.2005). The baseline values of healthy adults have been included from the study assessing the impact of a probiotic product (ISRCTN38739209, also approved by the aforementioned Ethics Committee (approval no. 158/10 26.03.2007)). The inclusion criteria for adults were as follows: considering themselves healthy, no gastrointestinal disorders and no recent history of antibiotic treatment.

Table 1 Clinical data of adults and the elderly persons (>65 years) (Mean values and standard deviations)

The healthy elderly were selected from the registry of family doctors and orthopaedists of the Tartu University Hospital, Estonia, before performing elective orthopaedic surgery. The inclusion criteria for volunteers were as follows: age 65 years or above, considering themselves generally healthy and had not had any recent antibiotic treatment.

Both adults and the elderly wished to participate in the study, which was confirmed by written informed consent. Subjects following special dietary routines, having an unstable cardiopulmonary system, with a history of diabetes and malignancy, chronic renal or hepatic failure, gut surgery, the presence of an acute illness 4 weeks before the study, on anti-hypertensive medication, with recent use of corticosteroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics during the last 2 months or with a history of alcohol abuse were excluded from participation in the present study.

Subjects in both groups consumed habitually a Western-type diet, typically rich in potatoes, vegetables, meat, eggs but characterised also with a high content of fibre (rye bread, oat/wheat/rice porridge) and dairy products, vegetable seed oils, margarine and non-alcoholic beverages(Reference Adlercreutz22, Reference Costacou, Bamia and Ferrari23).

Participants' body weight was measured in light clothing to the nearest 0·1 kg using a calibrated scale. Height was measured without shoes to the nearest 0·1 cm using a vertical ruler. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2)(Reference Wenzel24).

Blood samples were obtained in the early morning after 8 h of fasting. Samples were drawn from the antecubital vein with a vacutainer into heparinised tubes and immediately stored (on ice) at 4°C. Plasma glucose (mmol/l) was determined by standard laboratory methods using certified assays in the local clinical laboratory of the Tartu University Hospital. The reference values for human BMI (kg/m2) and glucose in blood (mmol/l) are presented in Table 1.

Approximately 2 g of fresh stool samples were placed into sterile containers. The samples collected at home or at the hospital were kept in a domestic refrigerator at 4°C for not more than 2 h before transportation to the laboratory, where the containers were stored frozen at − 70°C until use.

Counts of lactobacilli in faeces by the bacteriological method

For bacteriological analyses, the weighed samples of faeces were serially diluted (10− 2–10− 9) in pre-reduced phosphate buffer (pH 7·2) inside an anaerobic glove box (Sheldon Manufacturing, Inc., Cornelius, OR, USA), with a gas mixture (5 % CO2, 5 % H2 and 90 % N2). A quantitative analysis of the gut bacteria was performed using duplicate samples of 0·05 ml of each dilution on the de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke Hampshire, UK) for micro-aerobic lactobacilli. The de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe agar was incubated in a micro-aerobic atmosphere (CO2-incubator ‘Jouan’ IG 150, Saint-Herblain, France), with a gas mixture (10 % CO2) at 37°C for 48 h(Reference Sepp and Julge25). The colony counts of the different faecal dilutions on de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe media were recorded. All colonies of different morphology grown from the highest dilutions on de Man–Rogosa–Sharpe agar were isolated, and the lactobacilli were identified according to Gram-positive rod-shaped morphology and the negative catalase test(Reference Kandler, Weiss, Sneath, Mair and Sharpe20, Reference Mikelsaar, Annuk and Stsepetova26).

The lactobacilli composition of the gut microbiota was expressed as counts (log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/g) and prevalence (%) of lactobacilli. The detection level of the micro-organisms was ≥ 3 log CFU/g.

Molecular identification of Lactobacillus sp.

DNA extraction

Bacterial DNA from the faecal samples was extracted using a QIAamp DNA stool mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with some modifications. In 200 μl of 10 mm-Tris, 10 mm-EDTA buffer (pH 8; lysozyme (20 mg/ml) and mutanolysin (200 units/ml)), 0·22 g of faeces were resuspended and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Then, 0·3 g of 0·1 mm zirconia/silica beads and 1·4 ml of ASL solution (Qiagen) from the stool mini kit were added to the faecal samples. The tubes were then agitated for 3 min at a speed of 5000 rpm in a mini-bead beater (Biospec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK, USA). The protocol was then continued as described by the manufacturer (Qiagen).

Quantitative analysis of total lactobacilli by real-time-PCR

In order to establish a quantitative assay, we cloned plasmids containing the amplified region of target bacteria using the pGEM-T vector system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The PCR amplicon for L. paracasei was individually inserted into a separate plasmid vector; the recombinant vector was transformed in chemically competent Escherichia coli. Plasmids were purified with MaxiPrep (Qiagen). The purified plasmids were quantified by spectrophotometry (Quibit™; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) of multiple dilutions(Reference Bartosch, Fite and MacFarlane27). Quantification of target DNA was achieved by using serial tenfold dilutions from 102 to 109 plasmid copies of the previously quantified plasmid standards. Plasmid standards and samples were run in triplicate, and the average values were used for the calculation of the bacterial load.

Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with the ABI PRISM 7500 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA, USA) using optical-grade ninety-six-well plates. The PCR was performed on a total volume of 25 μl using SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems). Each reaction included 150 ng of template DNA, 12·5 μl of SYBR Green PCR Master mix (Applied Biosystems) and 2 μm of each primer(Reference Heilig, Zoetendal and Vaughan5, Reference Walter, Hertel and Tannok28) (Table 2). The conditions were set as follows: 2 min at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, followed by forty cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, and annealing and elongation at 60°C for 1 min. Data analysis was conducted with Sequence Detection Software version 1.6.3, supplied by Applied Biosystems.

Table 2 List of primers used for the detection of Lactobacillus spp.(Reference Song, Kato and Lui18, Reference Tilsala-Timisjärvi and Alatossava30Reference Haarman and Knol32)

OHOL, obligate homofermentative lactobacilli; OHEL, obligate heterofermentative lactobacilli; FHEL, facultative heterofermentative lactobacilli.

Reference strains

The reference strains used in the study were composed of three different fermentation groups(Reference Axelsson, Salminen and von Wright29) of Lactobacillus: OHOL L. acidophilus ATCC 4356, L. delbrueckii spp. delbrueckii ATCC 9649, L. salivarius DSM 20555, L. crispatus DSM 20584, L. johnsonii DSM 10533, L. gasseri DSM 20077, L. helveticus DSM 20075; FHEL L. paracasei DSM 20020, L. ruminis DSM 20403, L. curvatus ATCC 2560, L. casei NCDC 150, L. rhamnosus ATCC 53103, L. plantarum DSM 9843, L. sakei DSM 20100; OHEL L. fermentum ATCC 14931, L. reuteri DSM 20016, L. brevis DSM 20054, L. buchneri DSM 5987.

Species-specific PCR analysis of Lactobacillus sp. in faecal samples

The Lactobacillus species-specific qualitative PCR was carried out by primers listed in Table 2, targeted on the 16S–23S ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer region(Reference Song, Kato and Lui18, Reference Tilsala-Timisjärvi and Alatossava30Reference Haarman and Knol32). The primer pair for the L. ruminis subgroup is specific for L. ruminis, L. animalis, L. mali, L. salivarius and L. satsumensis (Reference Matsuda, Tsuij and Matsumoto33). A reaction mixture (50 μl) consisted of 10 ×  reaction buffer, a 200 μm concentration of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 1 μm of each primer, 100 ng of bacterial DNA (extracted from the faecal samples) and 1·5 U of HotStar Taq Plus DNA polymerase (Qiagen). The amplification programme consisted of pre-denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by thirty-five cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 30 s at the appropriate annealing temperature (Table 2), and finally 72°C for 30 s. A cycle of 72°C for 10 min concluded the programme. Amplification products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis on 2 % agarose gel, ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination.

The size of the PCR products was compared with that of the aforementioned Lactobacillus reference strains.

Statistical analyses

The statistical analysis was performed using the SIGMASTAT 2.0 (Jandel Scientific Corporation, San Rafael, CA, USA) and the SPSS 11.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software packages. Data are presented as means and standard deviations or ranges and medians. Bacterial count data were logarithmically transformed; the prevalence of the species was expressed as a percentage.

According to the data of the descriptive statistics, Student's t test and the Mann–Whitney rank-sum test were applied to compare the differences in clinical and microbiological indices. Logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the binary variables and/or continuous variables. The Spearman rank correlation test and the multiple linear regression models were used to test the associations between microbiological and clinical or biochemical indices in both groups. The models were adjusted for BMI, age and sex. All differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0·05.

Results

Clinical indices

Clinical indices of both groups are presented in Table 1. BMI was significantly higher in the elderly (P = 0·012). Similarly, the level of fasting blood glucose was higher in the elderly (P < 0·001).

Quantification of lactobacilli in faeces by the culture method and real-time PCR

The culture method and RT-PCR were used to determine the total number of lactobacilli in the faeces of healthy adults and the elderly.

Lactobacilli were cultured from twenty-three (96 %) out of the twenty-four adults and from thirty-six (97 %) out of the thirty-seven elderly persons. In both groups, the viable counts were below the detection limit. According to the RT-PCR results, lactobacilli were found in all faecal samples of adults and the elderly. Both methods showed that in the elderly, the total counts of lactobacilli were significantly higher (3·6–10·8, median 6·4; mean 6·8 (sd 2·2) log10 CFU/g of faeces v. 2·6–8·6, median 5·9; mean 5·3 (sd 1·8) log10 CFU/g of faeces; P = 0·008 by the culture method and 7·0–9·5, median 7·9; mean 8·0 (sd 0·7) log10 CFU/g of faeces v. 5·3–8·8, median 7·2; mean 7·2 (sd 0·7) log10 CFU/g of faeces; P = 0·0002 by RT-PCR) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Total counts of lactobacilli in adults and the elderly by (a) bacteriological analysis and (b) real-time-PCR. CFU, colony-forming units.

The values obtained for lactobacilli by RT-PCR were higher than those obtained by the culture method (mean 7·69 (sd 0·80)/log10 CFU/g of faeces v. mean 6·19 (sd 2·1)/log10 CFU/g of faeces; P = 0·007).

Identification of lactobacilli by species-specific PCR and their relationship with a person's age

Species-specific PCR analysis was performed with all samples, even with samples that were negative in bacteriological analysis. According to the PCR method, the number of species in adults was lower than in the elderly: 4–12, median 8, adults v. 5–11, median 6, elderly (P = 0·042). There was no correlation detected between the number of species and the count of lactobacilli estimated, neither by the culture method nor by RT-PCR. The most prevalent Lactobacillus species detected both from adults and the elderly were L. casei of the FHEL group and L. ruminis of the OHOL group ( ≥ 70 %; Fig. 2). The prevalence of L. crispatus was the lowest (8 %).

Fig. 2 Lactobacillus sp. diversity in adults (□) and the elderly (). OHOL, obligate homofermentative lactobacilli; FHEL, facultative heterofermentative lactobacilli; OHEL, obligate heterofermentative lactobacilli. *P = 0·031; P = 0·001; ‡ P = 0·0002; **P = 0·035; ‡‡ P = 0·007.

The age-related significant differences were found for six species of Lactobacillus. Concerning the OHOL metabolic pattern, the adults, in comparison with the elderly, were more often colonised with L. acidophilus (19/24, 79 % v. 18/37, 47 %; P = 0·031) and L. helveticus (16/24, 66 % v. 9/37, 24 %; P = 0·001). At the same time, L. johnsonii was detected only in the elderly (5/37, 13·5 %) (Fig. 2), and the age range of detection was older than 66, median 68 years old.

In the FHEL group, L. plantarum (22/37, 59 % v. 7/24, 29 %; P = 0·035) and L. paracasei (36/37, 97 % v. 14/24, 58 %; P = 0·0002) were more prevalent in the elderly than in adults. Surprisingly, L. rhamnosus was detected in seven (29 %) adults (P < 0·001), but not in any elderly person. The age range for the detection of L. rhamnosus was up to 48, median 31 years old.

The species difference was found also in the OHEL group where the higher prevalence of L. reuteri (19/37, 51 % v. 5/24, 21 %; P = 0·031) and on the borderline also with L. buchneri (11/37, 29 % v. 2/24, 8 %; P = 0·059) was observed in elderly persons (Fig. 2).

Comparison of lactobacilli counts and species with BMI, blood glucose and sex

A positive correlation between BMI and age was found (r 0·301; P = 0·0185), though sex was a confounding factor (Table 3). A positive correlation was found between BMI and fasting blood glucose content (r 0·463; P < 0·0001), adjusted for age and sex. The lower blood glucose level was predicted by the presence of intestinal L. paracasei (r 2 0·281; adjusted r 2 0·213; P = 0·031), adjusted for age in the adult group. A negative correlation of borderline significance was found between the level of blood glucose and colonisation by L. fermentum (r − 0·321; P = 0·052) in the elderly group. Multiple regression analysis revealed that BMI was associated with counts of cultivable lactobacilli adjusted for age and sex (r 2 0·187; adjusted r 2 0·144; P = 0·008). The higher BMI in both groups of persons was directly predicted by the presence of OHOL and facultative heterofermentative L. sakei species, both adjusted for age and sex (Table 3).

Table 3 Spearman's rank-order correlation, linear and multiple linear regression analyses between counts and species of lactobacilli, BMI, age and sex

CFU, colony-forming units; OHOL, obligate homofermentative lactobacilli.

* Age, sex.

Age (adult group).

Discussion

In the present study, the species-specific PCR analysis of Lactobacillus sp. combined with viable plating data indicates substantial age-related structural differences in the intestinal lactobacilli community of healthy adults and the elderly. In the elderly, the lactobacilli counts were higher, and their species composition was richer than those of younger persons. For the first time, it has been established that the values of BMI and glucose content are associated with counts, particular fermentation groups and species of intestinal Lactobacillus sp.

The present results confirm the previous culture-based studies, indicating higher viable counts of lactobacilli in healthy elderly people as compared with adults(Reference Tiihonen, Tynkkynen and Ouwehand2, Reference Mitsuoka and Wood34). Lactobacilli generally account for less than 1 % of the bacterial community of faeces; however, the composition of the lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract is still not well elaborated(Reference Marteau, Pochart and Dore35). In the present study, lactobacilli were detected in 90 % of the faecal samples by the culture method and in all samples by RT-PCR. In the elderly, the higher counts of intestinal lactobacilli were assessed by both methodological approaches. At the same time, previous data based on viable counts have shown that lactobacilli were present in the gastrointestinal tract of only 70–73 % of humans who consumed a Western-type diet(Reference Tannock36, Reference Finegold, Sutter, Mathisen and Hentges37), while in a vegetarian diet, a higher prevalence of lactobacilli has been assessed(Reference Finegold, Sutter and Sugihara38). In Estonia, the Western-type diet is characterised by the frequent use of fibre-rich rye bread, porridges and dairy products.

In the present study, we have had a unique possibility to compare both the cultivable and molecularly assessed counts and the PCR species composition of intestinal lactobacilli in adults and the elderly with the bacteriological data obtained previously in 1967–8 in Estonia, reviewed later(Reference Mikelsaar39). The high prevalence and high counts of lactobacilli were characteristics of adults and the elderly both in the late 1960s and 35 years later. Astonishingly, also the decreased colonisation of the elderly by homofermentative L. acidophilus strains coincided in both periods, irrespective of the different identification methods: physiological/biochemical properties as compared with molecular assessment. At the same time, in infants and children, the colonisation by lactobacilli has significantly decreased during 5 years of industrial development and changes in lifestyle of the Estonian community(Reference Sepp, Voor, Julge and Mendez-Vilas40). It is probable that the microbiota that was formed at a young age did not change easily by growing old.

All eighteen lactobacilli species identified in the present study were previously described as members of the faecal microbiota of humans, though some were only recently detected by molecular techniques using specific PCR primers such as the L. gasseri and L. ruminis group(Reference Walter13, Reference Ahrne, Nobaek and Jeppsson41, Reference Reuter42). In the present study, L. acidophilus, L. salivarius, L. paracasei, L. casei, L. plantarum, L. brevis and L. fermentum were the most common species in both age groups, which is in agreement with previous studies(Reference Vaughan, Heilig and Ben-Amor7, Reference Mikelsaar, Lencner, Bernhard and Knoke43, Reference Conway, Grubb, Midtvedt and Norin44). Reuter(Reference Reuter42) observed the predominance of L. reuteri among the indigenous intestinal lactobacilli, while some other authors reported this species as only a minor component of the OHEL group(Reference Nielsen, Møller and Rosenfeldt17, Reference Walter, Hertel and Tannok28) or completely absent in humans(Reference Vaughan, Heilig and Ben-Amor7). In our investigations, altogether 39 % of the human subjects harboured L. reuteri.

Besides, the composition of intestinal lactobacilli varies widely between persons and location in the gastrointestinal tract. However, the present results showed that age groups differed in their species diversity, whereas L. johnsonii. L. plantarum, L. paracasei, L. buchneri and L. reuteri were more prevalent in the elderly over 66 years of age. At the same time, L. acidophilus and L. helveticus of the OHOL group serve as more frequent colonisers of healthy adults, younger than 28 years. During ageing, the typical shifts in the Lactobacillus sp. population may have been caused by some degenerative shifts in the gastrointestinal function such as reduction in transit time and digestive secretions(Reference Mariat, Firmesse and Levenez45). Besides, the lowered reactivity of the immune system also emerges in the elderly(Reference Timiras, Greger and Windhorst46Reference Tiihonen, Ouwehand and Rautonen48). It is possible that these changes could explain the characteristic pattern of the faecal lactobacilli associated with advancing age.

A striking difference concerned the L. rhamnosus species, which was found only in the faecal samples of adults (21 %), but not in the elderly. Walter(Reference Walter13) has considered L. rhamnosus as one of the dominant Lactobacillus, though only 26 % of healthy individuals and 6 % of elderly harboured this species according to some other authors(Reference Silvi, Verdanelli and Orpianesi4, Reference Ahrne, Nobaek and Jeppsson41). In our elderly group, the complete absence of L. rhamnosus is difficult to explain, considering the aggressive marketing of Gefilus, one of the L. rhamnosus GG products in Estonia. We hypothesise that in the infancy of the studied elderly people (with birth years from 1920 to 1940) when the resident Lactobacillus sp. biota of the gastrointestinal tract were formed, diet and environment did not favour the spread of this species. Furthermore, during the next years of life, even the intensive spread of this probiotic strain did not help to colonise the seniors with previously well-formed microbiota.

The present results confirm that each person of both age groups had an individual set of combinations of different lactobacilli species, which is in agreement with previous, studies(Reference Mikelsaar, Annuk and Stsepetova26, Reference Ahrne, Nobaek and Jeppsson41, Reference Delgado, Suárez and Mayo49). The individual specificity, on the one hand, and the temporal modulation of intestinal microbiota by diet, lifestyle and stress, on the other hand, complicate the understanding of the relationships between colonic microbiota signatures and host functions throughout the lifespan(Reference Nielsen, Møller and Rosenfeldt17, Reference Lay, Rigottier-Gois and Holmstrm50, Reference Guarner51).

The elderly are more prone to the metabolic syndrome, characterised by a higher blood glucose level and BMI(Reference Lichtenstein, Dwyer and Rippe52, Reference Hashizume, Suzuki and Masahiro53). In our previous study of the elderly, we could not find any significant link between lactobacilli counts and BMI(Reference Mikelsaar, Stsepetova and Hütt54). In a larger number of individuals (adult and elderly persons), we detected a significant relationship between BMI and counts of cultivable lactobacilli, adjusted for age and sex. Why was it detected only when using bacteriological estimation of counts of lactobacilli? Discrepancies between RT-PCR and cultivable counts of lactobacilli have been found previously and were related to the multiplicity of 16S ribosomal RNA gene copies, the presence of non-viable, or viable but not cultivable, bacterial cells and to free DNA(Reference Farelly, Rainly and Stackebrandt55, Reference Apajalahti, Kettunen and Nurminen56). Additionally, due to the complex taxonomy of lactobacilli, the primers designed for lactobacilli based on 16S ribosomal RNA may also detect other related genera such as Pediococcus spp. and Weissella spp.(Reference Walter, Hertel and Tannok28).

How could the increased number of lactobacilli, particularly those of the OHOL fermentation group, influence health parameters such as the blood glucose level and BMI? The intestinal lactobacilli support intestinal epithelial cell proliferation through the production of SCFA that provide energy for the host(Reference Shanahan57). The main fermentation end product of the OHOL group is lactic acid. The lactobacilli of the FHEL and OHEL groups, including L. paracasei and L. fermentum, produce not only lactic acid, but also acetic acid and succinate(Reference Annuk, Shchepetova and Kullisaar12). It can be speculated that intestinal colonisation by some species of the latter groups decreases the content of both glucose (hexoses) and fructose (pentoses) due to its most effective phosphoketolase pathway of carbohydrate fermentation(Reference Axelsson, Salminen and von Wright29). Thus, the complex metabolic activities between the host and different groups of microbiota shape the nutrient environment of the gut(Reference Falk, Hooper and Midvedt58) and correspondingly the blood glucose level.

Lactobacilli also possess the ability to produce polyamines due to decarboxylation of amino acids(Reference Bover-Cid and Holzapfel59, Reference Morene-Arribas, Polo and Jorganes60). The high amounts of polyamines could facilitate the absorption of glucose, increasing the number of glucose carriers in the membrane of enterocytes(Reference Johnson, Brockway and Madsen61). In Finnish elderly people, a positive correlation between the counts of administered L. acidophilus NCFM (OHOL fermentation type) and the values of polyamine spermine was detected(Reference Ouwehand, Tiihonen and Saarinen62). This may be the reason for an increased BMI tightly bound to the glucose level of blood in persons colonised prevalently with several species of the OHOL group in the present study of both adults and the elderly.

The question arises whether the reduction of L. acidophilus and L. gasseri could influence the state of health of the elderly? Both L. acidophilus and L. gasseri harbour genes for formyl-CoA transferase and oxalyl-CoA decarboxylase that are obligate enzymes for oxalate degradation in the gastrointestinal tract. The genes for these enzymes are absent in L. johnsonii and L. plantarum (Reference Azcarate-Peril, Bruno-Barcena and Hassan63). It is possible that in the elderly, the higher prevalence of L. johnsonii and L. plantarum species can increase oxalate concentration in urine. This could support the development of kidney stone disease, common in the elderly(Reference Grases, Costa-Bauza and Prieto64).

According to the present study, L. sakei was found in a quarter of the investigated persons, yet it was unexpectedly associated with higher BMI. The ability of this species to metabolise complex carbohydrates into monosaccharides(Reference van Geel-Schutten, Flesh and Ten Brick65) may support their absorption by host cells. Some studies have indicated that L. sakei is one of the predominant food-associated Lactobacillus species that occurs in human faeces(Reference Heilig, Zoetendal and Vaughan5, Reference Walter, Hertel and Tannok28, Reference Dal Bello, Hammes and Hertel66). L. sakei has been isolated from meat, sausages and sauerkrauts, also used for the production of fermented meat products(Reference Hammes, Bantleon and Min67). At the same time, it is one of the major spoilage organisms for vacuum-packed meat products(Reference Hammes and Hertel68).

Tempting for future applications is our finding on the decreased blood glucose level in adults colonised with L. paracasei of the FHEL group. This finding is supported by data showing that administration of the close species of L. casei to diabetic mice reduced the glucose level of blood(Reference Matzuzaki, Nagata and Kado69). Likewise, a diet enriched with another Lactobacillus species of the FHEL group (e.g. L. rhamnosus GG) has resulted in an improved glucose tolerance test as well as in reduced blood glycated Hb values in experimental rats and pregnant women(Reference Yadav, Jain and Sinha70, Reference Laitinen, Poussa and Isolauri71). Altogether, this clearly hints at the different impact of particular Lactobacillus species of various fermentative groups on the metabolism of adults and the elderly having to be considered in the individual probiotic administration for health's sake.

Conclusion

There are substantial age-related (adults and the elderly) structural differences in the intestinal lactobacilli communities. The higher counts of intestinal lactic acid bacteria are associated with higher BMI and blood glucose content, while colonisation with different fermentative groups of lactobacilli is bound to the glucose levels both in adults and in the elderly. In developing blood glucose- and BMI-lowering species of lactobacilli as probiotics, their age- and metabolism-related differences should be taken into account.

Acknowledgements

We thank Irja Lutsar for critical reading of the manuscript and Pirje Hütt for help in statistical analysis. The authors' responsibilities were as follows: J. Š. was responsible for the study design, study performance, molecular analyses, data analyses and manuscript drafting; E. Sepp, E. Songisepp and K. L. were responsible for bacteriological analysis; H. K. was involved in clinical evaluation and the collection of samples; M. M. was the principal investigator and participated in the design of the study, coordination and drafting the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of data and in writing and approval of the final manuscript. None of the authors had a conflict of interest to declare. The present study was supported by grants from the Estonian Science Foundation (grant no. 6782) and the Ministry of Higher Education and Research (grant no. SF018255).

References

1Hebuterne, X (2003) Gut changes attributed to ageing: effects on intestinal microflora. Gastroenterology 6, 4954.Google Scholar
2Tiihonen, K, Tynkkynen, S, Ouwehand, A, et al. (2008) The effect of ageing with and without non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drugs on gastrointestinal microbiology and immunology. Br J Nutr 100, 130137.Google Scholar
3Mitsuoka, T (1992) Intestinal flora and ageing. Nutr Rev 50, 438446.Google Scholar
4Silvi, S, Verdanelli, MC, Orpianesi, C, et al. (2003) EU Project Crownalife: functional foods, gut microflora and healthy aging. Isolation and identification of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains from fecal samples of elderly subjects for a possible probiotic use in functional foods. J Food Eng 56, 195200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Heilig, HG, Zoetendal, EG, Vaughan, EE, et al. (2002) Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus ssp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 114123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tannock, GW (2004) A special fondness for lactobacilli. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 31893194.Google Scholar
7Vaughan, EE, Heilig, HG, Ben-Amor, K, et al. (2005) Diversity, vitality and activities of intestinal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria assessed by molecular approaches. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29, 477490.Google Scholar
8Garrity, GM, Bell, JA, Lilburn, TG, et al. (2004) Taxonomic Outline of the Prokaryotes. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Release 5.0, 2nd ed., pp. 401. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
9Sghir, A, Gramet, G, Saua, A, et al. (2000) Quantification of bacterial groups within human faecal flora by oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 22632266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Hirano, J, Yoshida, T, Sugiyama, T, et al. (2003) The effect of L. rhamnosus on enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection of human intestinal cells in vitro. Microbiol Immunol 47, 405409.Google Scholar
11Valeur, N, Engel, P, Carbajal, N, et al. (2004) Colonization and immunomodulation by L. reuteri ATCC 55730 in the human gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 11761181.Google Scholar
12Annuk, H, Shchepetova, J, Kullisaar, T, et al. (2003) Characterization of intestinal lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. J Appl Microbiol 94, 403412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Walter, J (2008) Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 49854996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Cani, PD & Delzenne, MN (2009) The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease. Curr Pharm Des 15, 15461558.Google Scholar
15Woodmansey, EJ, McMurdo, ME, Macfarlane, GT, et al. (2004) Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiota in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 61136122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Vassos, D, Maipa, V, Voidarous, C, et al. (2007) Development of human lactic acid gastrointestinal microbiotain a Greek rural population. Cent Eur J Biol 3, 5560.Google Scholar
17Nielsen, DS, Møller, PL, Rosenfeldt, V, et al. (2003) Case study of the distribution of mucosa-associated Bifidobacterium species, Lactobacillus species, and other Lactic acid bacteria in the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 75457548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Song, Y-L, Kato, N, Lui, C-X, et al. (2000) Rapid identification of 11 human intestinal Lactobacillus species by multiplex PCR assay using group- and species-specific primers derived from the 16S–23S rRNA intergenic spacer region and its flanking 23S rRNA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 187, 167173.Google ScholarPubMed
19Cagno, R, Rizello, CG, Garliardi, F, et al. (2009) Imbalance of the faecal microbiota and volatile organic compounds between treated and untreated coeliac children. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 39633971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Kandler, O & Weiss, N (1986) Regular non-sporing gram-positive rods. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2, pp. 12091234 [Sneath, PH, Mair, NS and Sharpe, ME, editors]. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins Baltimore.Google Scholar
21Bäckhed, F, Ding, H, Wang, T, et al. (2004) The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 1571815723.Google Scholar
22Adlercreutz, H (1990) Western diet and western diseases: some hormonal and biochemical mechanisms and associations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 201, 323.Google Scholar
23Costacou, T, Bamia, C, Ferrari, P, et al. (2003) Tracing the Mediterranean diet through principal components and cluster analyses in the Greek population. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 13781385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Wenzel, R (2007) Health care – associated infections. Major issues in early years of 21st century. Clin Infect Dis 45, 8588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Sepp, E, Julge, K, et al. (2005) Intestinal microbiota and imunoglobulin E responses in 5-year-old Estonian children. Clin Exp Allergy 35, 11411146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Mikelsaar, M, Annuk, H, Stsepetova, J, et al. (2002) Intestinal Lactobacilli of Estonian and Swedish Children. Microb Ecol Health Dis 14, 7580.Google Scholar
27Bartosch, S, Fite, A, MacFarlane, GT, et al. (2004) Characterization of bacterial communities in feces from healthy elderly volunteers and hospitalized elderly patients by using real-time PCR and effects of antibiotic treatment on the fecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 35753581.Google Scholar
28Walter, J, Hertel, C, Tannok, GW, et al. (2001) Detection of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, and Weisella species in human feces by using group-specific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 25782585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Axelsson, L (1998) Lactic acid bacteria: classification and physiology. In Lactic Acid Bacteria, pp. 172 [Salminen, S and von Wright, A, editors]. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
30Tilsala-Timisjärvi, A & Alatossava, T (1997) Development of oligonucleotide primers from the 16–23S rRNA intergenic sequences for identifying different dairy and probiotic lactic acid bacteria by PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 35, 4956.Google Scholar
31Walter, J, Tannock, GW, Tilsala-Timisjarvi, A, et al. (2000) Detection and identification of gastrointestinal Lactobacillus species by using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and species-specific PCR primers. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 297303.Google Scholar
32Haarman, M & Knol, J (2006) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of fecal Lactobacillus species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 23592365.Google Scholar
33Matsuda, K, Tsuij, H, Matsumoto, K, et al. (2009) Establishment of an analytical system for the human fecal microbiota, based on reverse transcription-quantitative PCR targeting of multicopy rRNA molecules. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 19611969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Mitsuoka, T (1992) The lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. In The Human Gastrointestinal Tract, vol. 1, pp. 69114 [Wood, BJB, editor]. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
35Marteau, P, Pochart, P, Dore, J, et al. (2001) Comparative study of bacterial groups within the human cecal and fecal microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 49394942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36Tannock, GW (1991) The microecology of lactobacilli inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract. Adv Microbiol Ecol 11, 147171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Finegold, SM, Sutter, VL & Mathisen, GE (1983) Normal indigenous intestinal flora. In Human Intestinal Microflora in Health and Disease, pp. 331 [Hentges, DJ, editor]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Finegold, SM, Sutter, VL, Sugihara, PT, et al. (1977) Fecal microbial flora in seventh day adventist populations and control subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 30, 17811792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Mikelsaar, M (1993) Evaluation of the gastrointestinal microbial ecosystem in health and disease. PhD Thesis, University of Tartu.Google Scholar
40Sepp, E, Voor, T & Julge, K (2006) Is intestinal microbiota bound up with changing lifestyle? In Modern Multidisciplinary Applied Microbiology, pp. 708712 [Mendez-Vilas, , editor]. Weinhein: Wiley-VCN Verlag.Google Scholar
41Ahrne, S, Nobaek, S, Jeppsson, B, et al. (1998) The normal Lactobacillus flora of healthy human rectal and oral mucosa. J Appl Microbiol 85, 8894.Google Scholar
42Reuter, G (2001) The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2, 4253.Google Scholar
43Mikelsaar, M & Lencner, A (1982) Mucosal lactoflora of gastrointestinal tract. In Mikrobielle Umwelt und/in antimikrobielle Massnahmen. Bd. 6. Mikroökologie des Magen-Darmkanals des Menschen (Microbial Environment and/or in Antimicrobial Action. vol. 6 Micro-ecology of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Man), pp. 8996 [Bernhard, H and Knoke, M, editors]. Leipzig: Barth-Verlag.Google Scholar
44Conway, P (1989) Lactobacilli: fact and fiction. In The Regulatory and Protective Role of the Normal Microflora, pp. 263283 [Grubb, R, Midtvedt, T and Norin, E, editors]. Stockholm: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
45Mariat, D, Firmesse, O, Levenez, F, et al. (2009) The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol 9, 123.Google Scholar
46Timiras, PS (1996) Physiology of aging: standards for age-related functional competence. In Comprehensive Human Physiology, vol. 2, pp. 23912405 [Greger, R and Windhorst, U, editors]. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47Gill, HS, Darragh, AJ, Cross, M, et al. (2001) Optimizing immunity and gut function in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 5, 6091.Google Scholar
48Tiihonen, K, Ouwehand, AC, Rautonen, N, et al. (2010) Human intestinal microbiota and healthy ageing. Ageing Res Rev 9, 107116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49Delgado, S, Suárez, A, Mayo, B, et al. (2007) Identification of dominant cultivatable lactobacilli species from the faeces of Spanish healthy adults. Int Microbiol 10, 141145.Google Scholar
50Lay, C, Rigottier-Gois, L, Holmstrm, K, et al. (2005) Colonic microbiota signatures across five northern European countries. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 41534155.Google Scholar
51Guarner, F (2006) Enteric flora in health and disease. Digestion 73, 512.Google Scholar
52Lichtenstein, AH (1999) Optimal nutrition for the mature adult in health and disease. In Lifestyle Nutrition, pp. 106126 [Dwyer, JT and Rippe, JM, editors]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
53Hashizume, K, Suzuki, S, Masahiro, H, et al. (2006) Metabolic syndrome and age-related dementia: endocrinological aspects of adaptation to aging. Mech Ageing Dev 12, 507510.Google Scholar
54Mikelsaar, M, Stsepetova, J, Hütt, P, et al. (2010) Intestinal Lactobacillus sp. is associated with some cellular and metabolic characteristics of blood in elderly people. Anaerobe 16, 240246.Google Scholar
55Farelly, V, Rainly, F, Stackebrandt, E, et al. (1995) Effect of genome size and rrn gene copy number on PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes from a mixture of bacterial species. Appl Environ Microbiol 61, 27982801.Google Scholar
56Apajalahti, J, Kettunen, A, Nurminen, PH, et al. (2003) Selective plating underestimates abundance and shows differential recovery of bifidobacterial species from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 57315735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57Shanahan, F (2002) The host–microbe interface within the gut. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 16, 915931.Google Scholar
58Falk, PG, Hooper, LV, Midvedt, T, et al. (1998) Creating and maintaining the gastrointestinal ecosystem, what we know and need to know from gnotobiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 11571170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59Bover-Cid, S & Holzapfel, WH (1999) Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 53, 3341.Google Scholar
60Morene-Arribas, MV, Polo, MC, Jorganes, F, et al. (2003) Screening of biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from grape must and wine. Int J Food Microbiol 84, 117123.Google Scholar
61Johnson, LR, Brockway, PD, Madsen, K, et al. (1995) Polyamines alter intestinal glucose transport. Am J Physiol 31, G416G423.Google Scholar
62Ouwehand, AC, Tiihonen, K, Saarinen, M, et al. (2009) Influence of a combination of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and lactitol on healthy elderly: intestinal and immune parameters. Br J Nutr 101, 367375.Google Scholar
63Azcarate-Peril, MA, Bruno-Barcena, JM, Hassan, HM, et al. (2006) Transcriptional and functional analysis of oxalyl-coenzyme A (CoA) decarboxylase and formyl-CoA transferase genes from Lactobacillus acidophilus. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 18911899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64Grases, F, Costa-Bauza, A, Prieto, RM, et al. (2006) Renal lithiasis and nutrition. Nutr J 5, 23.Google Scholar
65van Geel-Schutten, GH, Flesh, F, Ten Brick, B, et al. (1998) Screening and characterization of Lactobacillus strains producing large amount of polysaccharides. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50, 697703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66Dal Bello, F, Hammes, WP, Hertel, C, et al. (2003) Increased complexity of the species composition of lactic acid bacteria in human feces revealed by alternative incubation condition. Microb Ecol 45, 455463.Google Scholar
67Hammes, WP, Bantleon, A, Min, S, et al. (1990) Lactic acid bacteria in meat fermentation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 87, 165174.Google Scholar
68Hammes, WP & Hertel, C (1998) New development in meat starter cultures. Meat Sci 49, S125S138.Google Scholar
69Matzuzaki, T, Nagata, Y, Kado, S, et al. (1997) Effect of oral administration of Lactobacillus casei on alloxan-induced diabetes in mice. APMIS 105, 637642.Google Scholar
70Yadav, H, Jain, S, Sinha, PR, et al. (2007) Antidiabetic effect of probiotic Dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei in high-fructose fed rats. Nutrition 23, 6268.Google Scholar
71Laitinen, K, Poussa, T, Isolauri, E, et al. (2009) Probiotics and dietary counselling contribute to glucose regulation during and after pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 101, 16791687.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Clinical data of adults and the elderly persons (>65 years) (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 List of primers used for the detection of Lactobacillus spp.(18,3032)

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Total counts of lactobacilli in adults and the elderly by (a) bacteriological analysis and (b) real-time-PCR. CFU, colony-forming units.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Lactobacillus sp. diversity in adults (□) and the elderly (). OHOL, obligate homofermentative lactobacilli; FHEL, facultative heterofermentative lactobacilli; OHEL, obligate heterofermentative lactobacilli. *P = 0·031; P = 0·001; ‡ P = 0·0002; **P = 0·035; ‡‡ P = 0·007.

Figure 4

Table 3 Spearman's rank-order correlation, linear and multiple linear regression analyses between counts and species of lactobacilli, BMI, age and sex