Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:49:34.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First confident evidence of moulting in eodiscid trilobites from the Cambrian Stage 3 of South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2023

Yifan Wang Open the ORCID record for Yifan Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Jorge Esteve Open the ORCID record for Jorge Esteve [Opens in a new window] ,
Xinglian Yang ,
Rongxing Yu  and
Dezhi Wang
Yifan Wang
Affiliation:
Guizhou Research Centre for Palaeontology & College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Jorge Esteve
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Xinglian Yang*
Affiliation:
Guizhou Research Centre for Palaeontology & College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China Key Laboratory of Karst Georesources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Guiyang China
Rongxing Yu
Affiliation:
Guizhou Research Centre for Palaeontology & College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
Dezhi Wang
Affiliation:
Guizhou Research Centre for Palaeontology & College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China
*
Corresponding author: Xinglian Yang; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trilobite moulting behaviour has been extensively investigated. However, exuviae in eodiscid trilobites are poorly known. Here, we report two eodiscid trilobite specimens, Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis and Tsunyidiscus sp., showing Somersault configuration from the Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation of South China, respectively (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3). The arrangements of the exoskeletons indicate that the two specimens are the slightly disturbed and undisturbed exuviae. The impression of the lower cephalic unit (LCU) displays the rostral plate in Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis. The exuviae showing the LCU inverted anteriorly under the trunk. The opening of the facial and rostral sutures would have allowed the emergence of the post-ecdysial trilobite with the partial enrolment of exoskeleton. Moreover, our discovery indicates a Somersault configuration which employed the facial and rostral sutures to create an anterior exuvial gape that also exists in eodiscid trilobites besides redlichiid trilobites, corynexochid trilobites and ptychopariid trilobites during the Cambrian.

Keywords

eodiscid trilobitesSomersault configurationexuviaeCambrian Stage 3South China
Type
Rapid Communication
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 160 , Issue 8 , August 2023 , pp. 1441 - 1445
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Ecdysis refers to the process by which the exoskeleton is shed during growth in the clade Ecdysozoa which includes arthropods, nematodes and several other phyla (Henningsmoen, Reference Henningsmoen1975; Telford et al. Reference Telford, Bourlat, Economou, Papillon and Rota-Stabelli2008; Daley & Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016). Exploring the moulting process from the fossil record is important, since the developmental strategy of Ecdysozoa might have imparted constraints on morphology throughout their evolution, up to modern animal groups (Daley & Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016). Apart from this, more biological information on growth and development in deep time can be assessed, which can help resolve the affinity of enigmatic taxa early in the evolution of animals (Daley & Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016). Additionally, some specimens preserved midway through moulting can provide insight for understanding ecology as one of the only examples of direct evidence of behaviour preserved in the fossil record (García-Bellido & Collins, Reference García-Bellido and Collins2004; Daley & Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016; Yang et al. Reference Yang, Ortega-Hernández, Drage, Du and Zhang2019). Trilobites represent one of the main arthropod groups through the Palaeozoic. However, despite the fact that the trilobite moulting behaviour has been intensively studied in most of the trilobite orders (e.g. Henningsmoen, Reference Henningsmoen1975; McNamara & Rudkin, Reference McNamara and Rudkin1984; Speyer, Reference Speyer1985; Whittington, Reference Whittington1990; Brandt, Reference Brandt2002; Daley & Drage, Reference Daley and Drage2016; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018; Drage, Reference Drage2019; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020, Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Zhang, Luo, Shao, Sun, Ling and Wang2021), a lack of confidence about whether we are looking at real moults or disarticulated carcasses is present in some of them. One possible reason is that many of these works focused on disarticulated and isolated specimens (i.e. Museum collections) without a sedimentological and taphonomical context (see Corrales-García et al. Reference Corrales-García, Esteve, Zhao and Yang2020). The associated behaviour dealing with moults such as cryptic or synchronized moulting also has been explored and discussed (Rustán et al. Reference Rustán, Balseiro, Waisfeld, Foglia and Vaccari2011; Zong et al. Reference Zong, Fan and Gong2016; Zong & Gong, Reference Zong and Gong2017; Corrales-García et al. Reference Corrales-García, Esteve, Zhao and Yang2020; Zong, Reference Zong2021; Zong & Gong, Reference Zong and Gong2022). However, so far, only one record of moulting in eodiscid trilobites has been reported from the Kaili biota (Lin & Yuan, Reference Lin and Yuan2009).

Herein, we report two eodiscid trilobite exuviae belonging to the genus Tsunyidiscus (Zhang, Reference Zhang1966) from the early Cambrian of South China. These new finds shed new light first on the ecdysial sutures and second about the exuviating procedure of eodiscid trilobites.

2. Materials and methods

Two typically proparian eodiscid trilobites belong to the genus Tsunyidiscus (Zhang, Reference Zhang1966) and the holaspid specimens of this genus bear three thoracic tergites. The pygidium is similar in size to the cephalon (i.e. isopygous). The specimens were collected from the Cambrian Stage 3 Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation in north-central and central Guizhou Province, respectively, South China (Fig. 1), and are housed in the Guizhou Research Centre for Palaeontology, Guizhou University, China (KSNT-78-1958A, GZU-2022-1). The photograph of the first specimen (KSNT-78-1958A) was taken using a Canon 5D maker IV camera fitted with a Canon MP-E65mm f/2.8 1-5x. This specimen was not covered with ammonium chloride because the small size prevent to see the morphology once it is covered. The second specimen (GZU-2022-1) that comes from the Mingxinsi Formation has been coated with ammonium chloride sublimate. Pictures were taken using a Nikon D7100 fitted with a Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60 mm lens. Images were processed using CorelDRAW 2017 (a free trial version) to adjust tone, contrast, and brightness. Line drawings and measurements were based on high-resolution photographs in CorelDRAW 2017 (a free trial version).

Figure 1. Geological background map of study area and location of the fossil site. (a) The simplified early Cambrian geological map of Yangtze Block and location of the study specimens. (b) Stratigraphic series showing relative position and age of the Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation. Map modified from Yang and Zhang (Reference Yang and Zhang2016) and Zhu et al. (Reference Zhu, Sun, Yang, Yuan, Li, Zhou and Zhang2021).

The morphological terminology applied to the description of the studied material is a combination of those in Henningsmoen (Reference Henningsmoen1975), Whittington (Reference Whittington1990), Whittington and Kelly (Reference Whittington, Kelly and Kaesler1997), Drage et al. (Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018), some of them with brief statements below.

Exoskeleton unit:

Axial shield. The cranidium, thorax and pygidium are joined as a single unit (Henningsmoen, Reference Henningsmoen1975; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018).

Lower cephalic unit (LCU) is the cephalic integument with exception of cranidium and the joined LCU comprising the librigenae (doublure), rostral plate (if present) and hypostome, but sometime lacking the hypostome in some specimens (Henningsmoen, Reference Henningsmoen1975; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018).

Moult configuration:

Somersault configuration in Tsunyidiscus is the specimen showing LCU disarticulated from the cranidium and anteriorly inverted lying beneath the trunk (Whittington, Reference Whittington1990; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018).

3. Results

Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis (Chang, 1964) (= Hebediscus niutitangensis Zhang, Reference Zhang and Zhang1964) (KSNT-78-1958A).

KSNT-78-1958A is a partly disarticulated (but complete) meraspid specimen (meraspid degree 2), the cranidium shows one genal spine with two thoracic tergites (Fig. 2a, b). The lateral margin of right side of the cranidium is not well preserved. Although the left inverted librigena lies beneath the trunk, the impression of the left inverted librigena and ventral exoskeleton can be observed in the specimen. The specimen displays the inverted LCU (librigenae and ventral cephalic structures) lying beneath the trunk with minor anticlockwise rotation.

Figure 2. Somersault configuration in Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis and Tsunyidiscus sp. from the Cambrian Stage 3 Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation respectively, Guizhou Province, South China. (a) Specimen (KSNT-78-1958A) of Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis showing Somersault configuration. (b) Line drawing of the specimen (KSNT-78-1958A). (c) Specimen (GZU-2022-1) of Tsunyidiscus sp. showing Somersault configuration. (d) Line drawing of the specimen (GZU-2022-1). Scale bars: 0.2 mm (a, b); 1 mm (c, d). Additional abbreviations: LCU, the cephalic integument with exception of cranidium. Grey areas indicate the inverted exoskeletal unit.

Tsunyidiscus sp. (GZU-2022-1).

GZU-2022-1 is a partly disarticulated (but complete) holaspid specimen with three thoracic tergites (Fig. 2c, d). The specimen is stereoscopic. The cranidium, the thorax and the pygidium join together tightly. The LCU (librigenae and possible ventral cephalic structures) inverted anteriorly lying beneath the trunk in this specimen. Both sides of the thoracic tergites in the specimen is broken allowing to see the inverted librigenae. Two librigenae are inverted simultaneously and symmetrically. The position and arrangement of inverted librigenae indicate that there is connection between two librigenae, and this structure was hidden beneath the dorsal exoskeleton.

4. Discussion

Corrales-García et al. (Reference Corrales-García, Esteve, Zhao and Yang2020) described several clusters with hundreds of individuals and interpreted them as synchronized moulting behaviour showing all the moulting configurations and behaviours described by Daley and Drage (Reference Daley and Drage2016), Drage et al. (Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018) and Drage (Reference Drage2019). However, Corrales-García et al. (Reference Corrales-García, Esteve, Zhao and Yang2020) suggested that such high diversity of moulting configuration may be not related to behaviour. Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020) considered two configurations in particular to be confidently related to behaviour in moults of Arthricocephalites xinzhaiheensis, one of these being the Somersault configuration. This supports the moult assignment of the two specimens described here in the Somersault configuration. Given the degree of articulation in both specimens and the position of the LCU, we argue that they represent slightly or almost undisturbed exuviae. Physical disturbance may or may not lead to random and irregular configurations and fragments, but the specimens in Somersault configuration which meet the criteria for identifying moults (Henningsmoen Reference Henningsmoen1975; Whittington Reference Whittington1990; Daley & Drage Reference Daley and Drage2016; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020) can hardly have been produced by chance. Thus, we can state that these represent confident moult configuration with enough biological information.

Moulting behaviour has been described and argued in most of the trilobite groups, but moulting in eodiscids is poorly known. Only a single cluster containing 22 pagetiid individuals from the Kaili biota was identified as exuviae (Lin & Yuan, Reference Lin and Yuan2009). All specimens in their study with missing librigenae were interpreted as intact exuviae that had undergone minimal transport prior to burial by Lin & Yuan (Reference Lin and Yuan2009). But the evidence of the identified exuviae is too weak in their study. This monospecific cluster shows clear evidences of current orientation, and the dorsal-ventral attitude was lost which makes it difficult to argue against the currents and establish proper biostratinomic insights (Speyer & Brett, Reference Speyer and Brett1986; Hickerson, Reference Hickerson, Brett and Baird1997; Corrales-García et al. Reference Corrales-García, Esteve, Zhao and Yang2020). In fact, all specimens show axial shield in their study, and this configuration can originate from complete exuviae or disarticulated carcasses. Thus, it is difficult to distinguish the real exuviae from them. The physical disturbance also led to the loss of moulting information that preserved in slightly disturbed and undisturbed exuviae (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020), even if these specimens were real exuviae.

Until now most of the studies regard the eodiscid hypostome as natant in holaspid (Öpik, Reference Öpik1952; Whittington, Reference Whittington1988; Fortey, Reference Fortey1990) and only doublure and hypostome exist in the ventral cephalic side. The doublure is a continuation of the dorsal exoskeleton on the ventral side and natant hypostome lies freely below the cephalon. Zhang and Clarkson (Reference Zhang and Clarkson2012) studied abundant phosphatized material of eodiscoid trilobites from the lower and middle Cambrian of China. These authors showed an early meraspid (meraspid degree 0) cephalon of Shizhudiscus longquanensis with fine ridge-bearing doublure underneath the lateral border (see Zhang & Clarkson, Reference Zhang and Clarkson2012; Plate 9, Figure 2, 3). Zhang & Clarkson (op. cit) considered that this structure may become the librigena during subsequent development. Another specimen, a holaspid cephalon of Tsunyidiscus yanjiazhaiensis (see Zhang & Clarkson, Reference Zhang and Clarkson2012; Plate 1, Figure 12), displays the connection of the anterior and genal doublure via the attached librigenae. Apart from these, all librigenae are independent (see Zhang & Clarkson, Reference Zhang and Clarkson2012; Plate 1, Figures 14–16; Plate 9, Figures 6–8; Plate 10, Figures 16, 17; Plate 13, Figures 1, 2; Plate 16, Figures 4–7). These phosphatized specimens indicate that the librigenae are independent in eodiscoid trilobites and the doublure of the librigenae cannot connect one each other. Thus, there is almost no definite suture in the ventral side of eodiscid trilobites. However, the different finding appears in our specimens. The impression of the left inverted librigena and ventral exoskeleton can be observed in Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis (KSNT-78-1958A). The Tsunyidiscus sp. (GZU-2022-1) displays that both librigenae are inverted simultaneously and symmetrically. The impression and arrangement of inverted librigenae in these specimens indicates: the ventral structure connecting two librigenae and specific ventral suture exist in Tsunyidiscus. Cederström et al. (Reference Cederström, Ahlberg, Clarkson, Nilsson and Axheimer2009, p. 522, pl. 7) figured and described the hypostome of Calodiscus lobatus which changes from a conterminant attachment in late meraspid instars of degree 1, to a natant condition within meraspid instars of degree 2. They considered that the anterior border of hypostome was attached to the doublure of the frontal border, but this structure resembles the rostral plate. Although Cederström et al. (Reference Cederström, Ahlberg, Clarkson, Nilsson and Axheimer2009) found the important information of hypostomal condition in eodiscid trilobites, the relationship between facial sutures and possible ventral suture is still not clear. Zhang and Clarkson (Reference Zhang and Clarkson1993) speculated that the additional rostral plate which is possibly uncalcified may exist in eodiscid trilobites because of the narrow doublure in Pagetia. If the rostral plate exists in ventral cephalic structures of eodiscid trilobite Tsunyidiscus, the impression and arrangement of ventral cephalic structure are easy to explain in our specimens. So, here, we argue that the rostral plate could exist in our specimens.

Although we cannot make an accurate reconstruction of the ventral cephalic structures in eodiscid trilobites, we can state that Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis and Tsunyidiscus sp., present Somersault configurations, providing confident evidence of moulting processes in the early Cambrian. As many researchers described (McNamara & Rudkin, Reference McNamara and Rudkin1984; Whittington, Reference Whittington1990; Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020), this process involved the partial flexure or full enrolment of the exoskeleton. Eodiscids could enrol and several examples have been reported (e.g. Jell, Reference Jell1975; Zhang & Clarkson, Reference Zhang and Clarkson1993; Cederström et al. Reference Cederström, Ahlberg, Clarkson, Nilsson and Axheimer2009; Dai et al. Reference Dai, Zhang, Peng and Yang2019). The opening of facial suture and rostral suture would have allowed the emergence forward of the post-ecdysial trilobite. Subsequently, the dragging forward of the exuviae in this withdrawal led to the overturned LCU lying beneath the trunk. These eodiscid exuviae preserving an anteriorly inverted LCU lying beneath the trunk displays the Somersault configuration. Somersault configuration also exists in the Cambrian corynexochid trilobite Ogygopsis klotzi (McNamara & Rudkin, Reference McNamara and Rudkin1984, Figure 9; Whittington, Reference Whittington1990, Figures 9–12), Arthricocephalites xinzhaiheensis (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Wen, Zhang, Du and Shao2020, Figures 5A, B; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Peng, Wang, Zhang, Luo, Shao, Sun, Ling and Wang2021, Figures 3A–L), the redlichiid trilobite Paradoxides davidis (McNamara & Rudkin, Reference McNamara and Rudkin1984, Figure 12; Whittington, Reference Whittington1990, Figures 7–8), Bathynotus kueichouensis (Yang et al. Reference Yang, Dai, Zhang and Peng2021, Figure 8d), the ellipsocephaloid trilobite Estaingia bilobata (Drage et al. Reference Drage, Holmes, García-Bellido and Daley2018, Figure 3D), and the ptychopariid trilobite Nangaops danzhaiensis (Xu et al. Reference Xu, Zhao, Chen and Zhao2020, Figure 2F), Xingrenaspis xingrenensis (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Zhao, Yang, Chen and Zhao2021, Figure 3N) and Eosoptychoparia guizhouensis (Chen et al. Reference Chen, Zhao, Chen, Liu and Luo2022, Figures 3A–C).

5. Conclusion

Two eodiscids, Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis and Tsunyidiscus sp., from the Cambrian Stage 3 Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation respectively, from South China show the horizontally inverted LCU such that it faces the posterior lying beneath the trunk and are slightly disturbed and undisturbed exuviae. The impression of LCU indicates the rostral plate exists in the ventral cephalic structures of Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis. The arrangement of exoskeleton, Somersault configuration, in both exuviae suggests that facial and rostral sutures are ecdysial sutures of eodiscid trilobite Tsunyidiscus and the exuviating individuals need to apply flexion (i.e. partial enrolment) of the exoskeleton which lead to the overturned LCU lying beneath the trunk. This work has important implications in our understanding of trilobite evolution and their phylogenetic relationships since we show clear evidence that the same moulting strategy was employed by different trilobite orders.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dunchen Yi for his kind help, Yuning Yang, Qiujun Wang, Hui Zhang and Xiuchun Luo for their useful suggestions. We want to dedicate this work to the memory of Prof. Jin Peng and Prof. Yuanlong Zhao, thank you for your guidance, patient and friendship. We are grateful to the editor Dr. Bas Van de Schootbrugge and reviewer Dr. Harriet B. Drage for their valuable comments and improvement of the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Sciences Foundation of China (41962002, 42262003, 41672005), the Guizhou Bureau of Science and Technology (Gui. Sci. Sup. [2020] 4Y241), the China Scholarship Council (202206670003), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000), and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2021-125585NB-I00).

Competing interests

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

References

Brandt, DS (2002) Ecydsial efficiency and evolutionary efficacy among marine arthropods: implications for trilobite survivorship. Alcheringa 26, 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederström, P, Ahlberg, P, Clarkson, EN, Nilsson, CH and Axheimer, N (2009) The lower Cambrian eodiscoid trilobite Calodiscus lobatus from Sweden: morphology, ontogeny and distribution. Palaeontology 52, 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, SG, Zhao, YL, Chen, ZP, Liu, X and Luo, X (2022) Moult configurations of the trilobite Eosoptychoparia guizhouensis from the Wuliuan Stage in Jianhe, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 61, 165–76 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Chen, SG, Zhao, YL, Yang, XL, Chen, ZP and Zhao, XY (2021) Moulting behaviour of the Ptychopariid trilobite Xingrenaspis xingrenensis from the Cambrian Kaili Formation in Jianhe, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 60, 176–86 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Corrales-García, A, Esteve, J, Zhao, YL and Yang, XL (2020) Synchronized moulting behaviour in trilobites from the Cambrian Series 2 of South China. Scientific Reports 10, 14099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dai, T, Zhang, XL, Peng, SC and Yang, B (2019) Enrolment and trunk segmentation of a Cambrian eodiscoid trilobite. Lethaia 52, 502–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, AC and Drage, HB (2016) The fossil record of ecdysis, and trends in the moulting behaviour of trilobites. Arthropod structure and Development 45, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drage, HB (2019) Quantifying intra-and interspecific variability in trilobite moulting behaviour across the Palaeozoic. Palaeontologia Electronica 22, 1–39.Google Scholar
Drage, HB, Holmes, JD, García-Bellido, DC and Daley, AC (2018) An exceptional record of Cambrian trilobite moulting behaviour preserved in the Emu Bay Shale, South Australia. Lethaia 51, 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortey, RA (1990) Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology 33, 52–576.Google Scholar
García-Bellido, DC and Collins, DH (2004) Moulting arthropod caught in the act. Nature 429, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henningsmoen, G (1975) Moulting in trilobites. Fossils and Strata 4, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickerson, WJ (1997) Middle Devonian (Givetian) trilobite clusters from eastern Iowa and northwestern Illinois. In Paleontological Events: Stratigraphic, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications (eds Brett, CE and Baird, GC), pp. 224–46. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jell, PA (1975) Australian Middle Cambrian eodiscoids with a review of the superfamily. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 150, 1–97.Google Scholar
Lin, JP and Yuan, JL (2009) Reassessment of the mode of life of Pagetia Walcott, 1916 (Trilobita: Eodiscidae) based on a cluster of intact exuviae from the Kaili Formation (Cambrian) of Guizhou, China. Lethaia 42, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, KJ and Rudkin, DM (1984) Techniques of trilobite exuviation. Lethaia 17, 153–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, AA (1952) The hypostoma of Pagetia . Journal of Paleontology 26, 272–4.Google Scholar
Rustán, JJ, Balseiro, D, Waisfeld, B, Foglia, RD and Vaccari, NE (2011) Infaunal molting in Trilobita and escalatory responses against predation. Geology 39, 495–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, SE (1985) Moulting in phacopid trilobites. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 76, 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speyer, SE and Brett, CE (1986) Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies. Palaios 1, 312–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, MJ, Bourlat, SJ, Economou, A, Papillon, D and Rota-Stabelli, O (2008) The evolution of the Ecdysozoa. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363, 1529–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YF, Peng, J, Wang, DZ, Zhang, H, Luo, XC, Shao, YB, Sun, QY, Ling, CC and Wang, QJ (2021) Ontogenetic moulting behavior of the Cambrian oryctocephalid trilobite Arthricocephalites xinzhaiheensis . PeerJ 9, e12217. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, YF, Peng, J, Wang, QJ, Wen, RQ, Zhang, H, Du, GY and Shao, YB (2020) Moulting in the Cambrian oryctocephalid trilobite Arthricocephalites xinzhaiheensis from Guizhou Province, South China. Lethaia 54, 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, HB (1988) Hypostomes and ventral cephalic sutures in Cambrian trilobites. Palaeontology 31, 577–609.Google Scholar
Whittington, HB (1990) Articulation and exuviation in Cambrian trilobites. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 329, 27–46.Google Scholar
Whittington, HB and Kelly, SRA (1997) Morphological terms applied to Trilobita. In Treatise on invertebrate paleontology Part O Arthropoda 1, Trilobita, revised (ed Kaesler, RL), pp. 313–29. Lawrence: The Geological Society of America and The University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Xu, LE, Zhao, YL, Chen, ZP and Zhao, XY (2020) Exuviation of trilobite Nangaops danzhaiensis Zhou in Lu et al., 1974 from Cambrian “Tsinghsutung Formation” of Balang, Guizhou. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 59, 403–8 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Yang, J, Ortega-Hernández, J, Drage, HB, Du, KS and Zhang, XG (2019) Ecdysis in a stem-group euarthropod from the early Cambrian of China. Scientific Reports 9, 5709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, KY, Dai, T, Zhang, XL and Peng, SC (2021) Trunk regionalization and functional morphology of the globally distributed trilobite Bathynotus from Cambrian Series 2 of China. PalZ 95, 373–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, YN and Zhang, XL (2016) The Cambrian palaeoscolecid Wronascolex from the Shipai fauna (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4) of the three gorges area, South China. Papers in Palaeontology 2, 555–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, WT (1964) Atlas of Palaeozoic Fossils of Northern Guizhou (ed Zhang, WT), pp. 1–44, pls 1–20. Nanjing: Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Zhang, WT (1966) On the classification of Redlichiacea, with description of new families and new genera. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 14, 135–84 (in Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zhang, XG and Clarkson, EK (1993) Ontogeny of the eodiscid trilobite Shizhudiscus longquanensis from the Lower Cambrian of China. Palaeontology 36, 785–806.Google Scholar
Zhang, XG and Clarkson, ENK (2012) Phosphatized eodiscoid trilobites from the Cambrian of China. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 297, 1–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, MY, Sun, ZX, Yang, AH, Yuan, JL, Li, GX, Zhou, ZQ and Zhang, JM (2021) Lithostratigraphic subdivision and correlation of the Cambrian in China. Journal of Stratigraphy 45, 223–49 (In Chinese with English summary).Google Scholar
Zong, RW (2021) Injuries and molting interference in a trilobite from the Cambrian (Furongian) of South China. PeerJ 9, e11201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, RW and Gong, YM (2017) Behavioural asymmetry in Devonian trilobites. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 476, 158–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zong, RW and Gong, YM (2022) Allopatric molting of Devonian trilobites. Scientific Reports 12, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zong, RW, Fan, RY and Gong, YM (2016) Seven 365-million-year-old trilobites moulting within a nautiloid conch. Scientific Reports 6, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geological background map of study area and location of the fossil site. (a) The simplified early Cambrian geological map of Yangtze Block and location of the study specimens. (b) Stratigraphic series showing relative position and age of the Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation. Map modified from Yang and Zhang (2016) and Zhu et al. (2021).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Somersault configuration in Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis and Tsunyidiscus sp. from the Cambrian Stage 3 Niutitang Formation and Mingxinsi Formation respectively, Guizhou Province, South China. (a) Specimen (KSNT-78-1958A) of Tsunyidiscus niutitangensis showing Somersault configuration. (b) Line drawing of the specimen (KSNT-78-1958A). (c) Specimen (GZU-2022-1) of Tsunyidiscus sp. showing Somersault configuration. (d) Line drawing of the specimen (GZU-2022-1). Scale bars: 0.2 mm (a, b); 1 mm (c, d). Additional abbreviations: LCU, the cephalic integument with exception of cranidium. Grey areas indicate the inverted exoskeletal unit.