Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:18:09.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BRUTALISED, BOUND AND BLED: A CASE OF LATER IRON AGE HUMAN SACRIFICE FROM WINTERBORNE KINGSTON, DORSET

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2024

Miles Russell
Affiliation:
Miles Russell, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Email: [email protected]
Martin Smith
Affiliation:
Martin Smith, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Email: [email protected]
Ellen Hambleton
Affiliation:
Ellen Hambleton, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Email: [email protected]
Paul Cheetham
Affiliation:
Paul Cheetham, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Email: [email protected]
Heather Tamminen
Affiliation:
Heather Tamminen, Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the practice of human sacrifice in the British Iron Age is mentioned by multiple authors, both ancient and modern, physical proof of such activity in the archaeological record is comparatively rare. At Winterborne Kingston, in Dorset, the skeletal remains of a young adult female found face down near the base of a cylindrical storage pit provides clear evidence of violent death in the later Iron Age. Analysis of the skeleton suggests an individual who led a hard-working life and who, having suffered an act of violence a few weeks before death, was killed, possibly with her hands tied, by a blade incision to the neck. Placement of the body further suggests that killing was enacted within the pit, execution as spectacle forming the final act in a larger ceremony involving the creation of an animal bone stack or platform.

Type
Research paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Antiquaries of London

BACKGROUND

In 2010 a deposit of human and animal bone was uncovered close to the base of a 1.2m-deep pit, number 5013, one of sixty-three such features being excavated inside an Iron Age banjo enclosure at Winterborne Kingston in Dorset (figs 1 and 2).Footnote 1 Banjo enclosures, sub-circular areas bounded by a ditch and an external bank connected to a wider system of fields by a funnelled entrance passage, form a distinctive type of later prehistoric site,Footnote 2 within which multiple pits and small numbers of roundhouses predominate.Footnote 3 To date, more than 140 banjo enclosures have been identified in Britain, the majority from central southern England (Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Dorset, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Oxfordshire, Wiltshire and West Sussex).Footnote 4 First thought to represent stock corrals, excavated banjos have invariably revealed traces of settlement, practising mixed agriculture with a strong pastoral element, dating evidence suggesting use from around 400 bc to the mid-first century ad.Footnote 5

Fig 1. Map showing location of Winterbourne Kingston, Dorset, within the UK and Ireland.

Fig 2. The Iron Age banjo enclosure of Winterborne Kingston, Dorset, under excavation in 2011, looking due north through the entranceway to the interior. Photograph: © Adam Stanford for Bournemouth University.

The human remains from pit 5013 at Winterborne Kingston comprised a fully articulated adult, SK-04, positioned over a layer of animal bone (figs 3 and 4). The body lay in a prone position, head and lower limbs towards the left, face tilted downwards towards the left shoulder. Upper limbs were flexed at the elbows, hands resting beneath the body anterior to the abdomen. A sample of bone has been accelerator mass spectrometry dated to 351–53 cal bc (95 per cent confidence interval).Footnote 6 Rather than being casually thrown into the pit as refuse, the animal bone layer showed signs of deliberate arrangement, different species (predominantly horse and cow) laid broadly parallel to one other, running transverse to the direction of human remains. The cranium of a horse and three mandibles of cattle lay next to the upper thorax and head of Sk-04, while the mandible of a dog lay close to the right hip.

Fig 3. Iron Age adult human female Sk-04 lying prone, face down, close to the base of cylindrical pit 5103 above a structured deposit of animal bone and the same deposit with human remains removed. Images facing west-south-west. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

Fig 4. Plan and section drawings of pit 5013, showing the location and position of Sk-04 and the underlying animal bone deposit, within the western portion of the feature. Images: © Bournemouth University.

The treatment of Sk-04 stands apart from other burials recorded at Winterborne KingstonFootnote 7 and elsewhere from Late Iron Age cemeteries across Dorset,Footnote 8 where bodies were usually furnished with pots and joints of meat. Sk-04 lacked any obvious burial accoutrements, while positioning did not show the same degree of care in placement as other inhumations recorded from inside the banjo enclosure, set down in a flexed or semi-supine position.Footnote 9 This report considers the overall nature of the deposit in an attempt to understand who Sk-04 was, the cause and circumstances of death and the possible significance of the animal bone stack onto which the body was laid.

OSTEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Previous studies of human and animal remains have demonstrated that the taphonomic investigation of bone surface modification and skeletal element representation helps discriminate between different mechanisms of formationFootnote 10 with further potential, when integrating microscopic analyses of bone diagenesis,Footnote 11 to improve understanding of depositional practice. Detailed archaeothanatological analyses of the position and post-depositional movement of human skeletal remains have further provided insights into Iron Age burial,Footnote 12 other studies demonstrating the benefit of detailed taphonomic studies of animal remains to create artefact biographiesFootnote 13 that facilitate investigation of the different treatments and changing role of animal remains in the time between death and burial. In recognition of the potential of these combined approaches, this paper presents detailed human osteobiography in combination with taphonomic investigation of both the human and animal bone in order to better understand the relationship between these different classes of remains and the treatment of Sk-04 in life, death and deposition.

Human remains

The skeleton was essentially complete and intact. All anatomical relationships were preserved as in life, with the exception of normal post-depositional movement during decomposition in a filled space,Footnote 14 consistent with deposition of the body shortly after death. A few elements, namely the right scapula, lower thoracic/upper lumbar vertebrae, right ilium, left and right pubis and fibula shafts, were subject to in situ post-depositional breakage, evidenced by irregular fracture margins, with identical soil patination to the rest of the bone. The surfaces had survived well with little post mortem cracking and no cortical flaking. There was slight root etching in places with the overall condition equating to McKinley’s Stage 0–1.Footnote 15

All observable indicators of biological sex were consistent with a female, the exception being the mastoid processes and the right greater sciatic notch, which were scored as indeterminate.Footnote 16 The anterior portions of the innominates were too fragmented for reliable assessment. Metric observations relevant to sex determination all fell within the respective female ranges. Given the overall consistency in these results, and the lack of any indications to the contrary, the individual was concluded to be female.Footnote 17 Indicators of age at death were in good general agreement, placing the individual between her mid-twenties and early thirties with an age in the late twenties being most likely. The auricular surface was recorded as Buckberry and Chamberlain’s Phase ii (mean 29.33 years, range 21–38 years).Footnote 18 The sternal rib ends were most consistent with İşcan and Loth’s Phase 4 (24–32 years).Footnote 19 The cranial sutures were mostly open, consistent with a younger adult (Phase S1), firmly under forty but unlikely to be much older than thirty.Footnote 20 Dental wear was consistent with the earlier phase of Brothwell’s Stage 2 (25–35 years).Footnote 21 Lastly, all epiphyses were fully fused, with the exception of the manubrium/sternum, which remains unfused in some adults.Footnote 22 Vestiges of epiphyseal lines remained visible on various elements (humeral heads, medial clavicle, iliac crests and femoral heads), again consistent with an adult no older than twenty-five to thirty.

Tibiae were noted to be asymmetrical in length, so stature was estimated solely from the femur (max length: 410mm).Footnote 23 This gave a result of 155.37cm (+/–3.72), or 151.65–159.09cm (59.7”–62.63”/4’11–5’2”). The individual’s spine exhibited a high degree of degenerative change in relation to her relatively young age at death. Marginal osteophytes, some of which were considerably pronounced, were present on the superior and inferior margins of the bodies of the sixth, tenth and twelfth thoracic and first to third lumbar vertebrae. Such extensive changes are not normally seen in individuals below the age of forty and are indicative of significant degeneration of the intervertebral discs.Footnote 24 Multiple Schmorl’s nodes were present on the eighth to twelfth thoracic and second to fifth lumbar vertebral bodies (fig 5). In an osteological context, these are rounded focal areas of bony erosion caused by rupture of intervertebral discs with associated herniation of the contents (material of the nucleus pulposus). Schmorl’s nodes can be caused by acute trauma, for example they are common in road traffic collisions in modern populations, as well as repetitive mechanical stresses, particularly involving compressive forces placed on the spine.Footnote 25 In this latter context they have been noted to occur in young individuals who have engaged in repetitive strenuous activity such as repeated heavy lifting.Footnote 26

Fig 5. Bones of the lumbar spine of Sk-04, showing degenerative changes in the form of marginal osteophytes (a) and (b) Schmorl’s nodes (focal necrotic destruction caused by herniated intervertebral discs). Photograph: © Bournemouth University.

There was a partially healed fracture to the shaft of the left fifth rib, 170mm anterior from the costovertebral articulation, indicated by a swollen area consisting of patterned new bone formation around the two fractured ends (fig 6). Healing was advancing well, with the initial fibrocartilaginous callus that forms following a fracture in the process of converting to bone and progressing towards union by bridging the break with woven bone at the time of death. Rib fractures in adults typically take up to twelve weeks to heal completely.Footnote 27 In a study of forensic cases involving rib fractures of known interval between injury and death, examples in a similar state of healing as that in the current study have a minimum post-traumatic survival time of twenty-one days.Footnote 28 Fractures of this type are caused by blunt trauma to the chest, although beyond this statement they are a relatively ‘non-specific’ injury, in that the potential causes of rib fractures are multiple and varied.Footnote 29 The fracture was transverse in form, which is most consistent with a direct blow to the chest.Footnote 30 The adjacent ribs were uninjured; for this injury to have resulted from a fall, the individual would need to have fallen hard onto a projecting object with the force concentrated on the rib in question. While such a scenario remains possible, it is arguably more plausible that the form of injury present resulted from a deliberate assault. Rib fractures are certainly among a suite of injuries commonly seen in modern instances of domestic violence,Footnote 31 being relatively disabling during the time they are healing, with the mean loss of working time following such injury recorded at 51+/–39 days in a modern US population.Footnote 32

Fig 6. The left fifth rib of Sk-04, with a fracture that was in the process of healing at the time of death. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

There was a defect in the bone located on the superior aspect of the left lamina on the second cervical vertebra (fig 7). This took the form of a linear incision, patinated identically to the rest of the bone, with a tightly angled, V-shaped profile. The internal walls of the defect were flat and the overall form of this damage was consistent with the bone having been cut into by a sharp, narrow-bladed object. The defect was approximately 5.2mm long by 1.5mm at its widest,Footnote 33 tapering to a point, where the defect then continued as a fine crack that was interpreted as having formed post mortem, on the basis of its irregular form. This interpretation was upheld on further close analysis using scanning electron microscopy (fig 7f).Footnote 34 Further credence was given to the interpretation of the initial defect as a tool mark by the presence of a second, fine defect in line with the first, situated in the same plane on the posterior edge of the left superior articular facet (fig 7d). No corresponding damage was present on the inferior surfaces of the first cervical vertebra and, given the angle of the cuts, it would seem they could not therefore have been inflicted in a lateral motion, cutting into the neck from the side.

Fig 7. (a)–(c) show views of Sk-04’s second cervical vertebra (C2) with cutmarks to the left lamina – arrowed in (a) and (b); (d) shows the two cutmarks are aligned and so were made with a single movement of the blade; (e) shows the edge of the posterior incision; (f) scanning electron micrograph of the posterior cutmark, the dotted lines mark the point at which the incision ends and the kerf has opened further as a post mortem dehydration crack. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

Together these were consistent with a sharp, fine, single bladed implement having been inserted into the individual’s neck between the first and second cervical vertebrae from behind, just under the base of the skull (fig 8). This trajectory would involve the blade piercing both superficial and deep muscles, but avoiding the structures of the neck crucial to survival and normal functioning (the major blood vessels and narrowly missing the spinal cord). The absence of bone remodelling indicates that the individual did not survive this injury, although it would not in itself be sufficient to immediately cause death. However, given the overall presentation of the burial, deposited in an unusual position as part of a ritual deposit, rather than with sympathetic funerary treatment, the evidence of a bladed object being inserted into the neck would support an interpretation of death immediately prior to placement in the pit.

Fig 8. The trajectory of the incised trauma to vertebra C2. (a) lateral view showing angle in relation to the bones of the cervical spine; (b) and (c) superior view showing position of the cut in relation to adjacent soft tissue structures (images created using Anatomage Table software version 8.0).

The individual had a generally gracile build, although various muscle attachments were notably rugged. These included the attachment of the right deltoid, the pectoralis muscles and the forearm muscle attachments at the medial epicondyles of both humeri. The lower limbs told a similar story, with the subtrochanteric muscle attachments of both femora also markedly rugged. The size and rugosity of these points of attachment, where tendons link muscle to bone, indicate a high degree of repetitive mechanical strain due to strenuous muscle contractions,Footnote 35 and this line of evidence provides further indication of a physically rigorous and active life. The skeleton exhibited a fair degree of lateral asymmetry with notable differences in lengths of the forearm bones and tibiae. The facial skeleton was also asymmetrical, with the right side of the face dropped in relation to the left. There was a degree of lateral wedging to the lower lumbar vertebrae (L3 and L4), likely resulting from the individual’s posture being adapted to compensate for the asymmetry in her lower limbs. The degree of degenerative change present in her spine may have been affected by the stresses induced by such modified posture, although this latter point would not account for the overall severity of the spinal changes observed.

The individual’s lower right second molar was sampled for strontium and oxygen isotope analysis at the National Environmental Isotope Facility Laboratory, British Geological Survey. The sample had a relatively common Sr isotope composition for Britain of 0.70888. This value is not strongly diagnostic of geographic origin. The oxygen isotope composition was relatively high (27.7‰) and just outside the 1SD range of west and south coast populations, which cannot be excluded as the childhood origin of this individual based on these results (fig 9). The nearest points from which the individual could have originated are approximately five kilometres to the south of Winterbourne Kingston, although a variety of other areas both in Britain and on the continent are possible, the closest comprising an area extending to the Dorset coast in the south and expanding eastwards to cover much of what is now the New Forest and the northern part of the Isle of Wight. Scattered pockets of territory towards the north of Dorset are also possible, with a region approximately 50km to the west in the area of the modern Dorset–Devon border being next. These results are therefore equivocal in that Sk-04 may have come from the area close to the site, but could equally have originated from further south in the Dorset zone or from areas beyond Dorset to the west or east.

Fig 9. Areas of southern Britain that cannot be excluded as a childhood origin for the human tooth sample from Sk-04 based on strontium and oxygen isotope compositions, with the site of Winterbourne Kingston circled. Map produced using the British Geological Survey biosphere isotope domain facility.

Bone stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen were obtained (δ13C:–19.9‰, δ15N:10‰) indicating a terrestrial diet in which protein sources were largely derived from animal products (meat or milk) rather than plant-based foods. Similar carbon values were obtained from other individuals buried at Winterborne Kingston (mean –20.06‰, sample size: twenty-eight). The nitrogen value is at the higher end of the range for individuals sampled from this site (mean 9.17‰), although it should be borne in mind that, given the broad date range obtained for Sk-04, the other individuals sampled may date from up to two to three centuries later.

Animal remains

A group of animal bones made up a spatially distinct spread along the west and south-west edges of the pit, located directly beneath the human skeleton (fig 3). The spread of animal bones was assigned to context 5059, although they were at the very lowest level of this fill, lying directly on top of 5177. The spread included most of the identified large mammal bones from context 5059 (thirteen identified fragments of cow and twelve of horse), with sheep/goat remains (four bones) and dog (one bone) less well represented.

The horse bones include an almost complete cranium, fragments of a mandible, three scapulae, a humerus, two femora and two metapodials. All scapulae were from the right side, so the remains came from a minimum number of three separate individuals. Cattle remains came from a minimum number of three separate individuals and include the right and left mandibles of one adult cow and the left mandibles of two other adults. Other cattle bones include two humeri, a pelvis, femur, tibia, astragalus, two metatarsals and a loose mandibular molar tooth. Within the animal bone spread under the human burial, none of the skeletal elements were in anatomical articulation. Bone distribution, however, appeared to show a spatial pattern whereby head elements (horse skull and two cattle mandibles) were located at the northern most end of the spread, near the head end of the human burial, while forelimb bones (mostly horse) were located in the middle of the spread and bones from the hindquarters and feet of horse and cattle were located towards the most southerly end near the legs of the human. At the western extent of the bone spread, to one side of Sk-04, other bones were identified including a dog mandible (near the hip) and a cow metatarsal and sheep tibia (near the upper leg).

The bones were visually inspected for signs of surface damage and the presence of any modifications identified as butchery, gnawing and weathering were noted. Butchery/cut marks were assigned on the basis of their characteristic appearance of straight linear marks with V-shaped cross-sections, and their location and orientation on the bone.Footnote 36 Canid gnawing was identified from presence of conical punctures, shallow pitting and crenulated edges at the ends of bone shafts, and linear scoring/grooves with a U-shaped cross-section.Footnote 37 Weathering was identified by the presence of linear cracking and surface flaking and further degradation of the cortical surface of the bone,Footnote 38 and graded according to severity, with more advanced stages indicating longer periods of sub-aerial exposure.Footnote 39 The state of preservation of the cattle and horse bones provide an indication of their depositional history and treatment. All the identified animal bones display signs of surface weathering, including cracking and patches of flaking and surface exfoliation, broadly equivalent to weathering stages 1 and 2 as described by Behrensmeyer,Footnote 40 although one horse metapodial displayed more advanced weathering (equivalent to Behrensmeyer’s stages 3–4).

Relating weathering stage to duration of exposure prior to burial is difficult, as variables such as temperature, moisture, sun exposure/shade all have an effect,Footnote 41 but the degree of weathering here represents a period of exposure of at least several weeks and potentially substantially longer (several seasons). Further evidence of exposure prior to burial is the canid gnawing damageFootnote 42 on at least five of the cattle limb bones and very similar (also probably gnawing) damage on the two horse femora. The empty maxillary tooth sockets in the horse skull and a similar absence of teeth in one of the cattle mandibles are the result of post mortem tooth loss from dry-bone remains. Soil was excavated by hand and dry-sieved, this method successfully recovering small bones and fragments, but no corresponding loose teeth were found. This indicates that the horse skull and at least one of the cow mandibles had previously decayed for long enough for teeth to have become loose (and lost elsewhere) before ending up in the pit. What is unclear is whether these remains had previously lain in the bottom of the pit, atop layer 5177, before being further disturbed to form the spread upon which Sk-04 was deposited, or whether the animal remains had been located and decomposed elsewhere, perhaps in a midden or a different pit. Given the depth and vertical sides of pit 5013, the canid scavenging probably occurred in a more accessible location prior to the bones entering the pit. The degree of weathering, post mortem tooth loss and evidence of gnawing all point to these animal remains having been previously exposed for long enough to have skeletonised and for teeth to have been lost before being redeposited as a bone spread upon which Sk-04 lay. The more weathered and gnawed state of the animal bones when compared with the condition of Sk-04 is suggestive of different taphonomic histories and treatment of animals and human remains prior to their final burial. This reflects similar findings from other Iron Age sites, such as Danebury hillfort, where analyses of weathering and gnawing on bone has shown greater evidence of exposure among the animal remains than among articulated and disarticulated human remains.Footnote 43

The redeposition of weathered animal bones makes it difficult to determine the extent to which carcasses had been previously processed or prepared for consumption. The paired cattle mandibles both had cut marks on the ventral surface of the diastema, but no other bones from this spread displayed any obvious signs of butchery, deliberate de-fleshing or other acts of processing. If the remains represent food waste accumulated over a long period or the remains of a single large-scale consumption event (feasting), this was clearly not contemporary with the death and disposal of Sk-04. The intact, articulated and only lightly weathered condition of the human burial suggests the body entered pit 5013 fleshed, while the disarticulated, gnawed and weathered condition of the animal bones suggests they had been defleshed and left exposed prior to deposition. Microscopic study of bone histology has the potential to provide further complementary information concerning whether the body was buried fleshed or had previously been left to skeletonise.Footnote 44 Although the death and any subsequent processing and consumption of the animals described was not contemporary with the disposal of Sk-04, the arrangement of animal bones into the spread that underlies the body could well have occurred immediately prior to her interment. The weathering on some of the bones, most notably the horse skull and one of the cattle mandibles, showed more advanced weathering on the surfaces that were uppermost as they were orientated in the pit, suggesting a further period of exposure in situ. Caution is needed, for this pattern of additional weathering is not necessarily ancient and may be due to these previously weathered surfaces degrading further during excavation in the period of exposure to the dry summer heat between initial discovery and eventual lifting. However, restriction of the spatial spread of the animal bones to the area of the pit immediately under the body did provide some protection, and the lack of any stratigraphic separation between the animal bone spread and the human remains immediately above strongly support the interpretation that the arrangement of the animal bone spread was contemporary with the human burial.

DISCUSSION

Pits found within areas of Iron Age settlement have, since the late 1930s, been broadly interpreted as storage facilities, securing seed corn over winter, rather than features with a more exclusive ‘ritual’ function.Footnote 45 Cunliffe has discussed the possible implications of storage in the minds of prehistoric people who may have placed their trust in chthonic entities to protect and preserve vital resources,Footnote 46 as well as showing gratitude through the placement of propitiatory offerings.Footnote 47 The presence of votive items within Iron Age pits throughout much of Iron Age Europe could indicate belief in a subterranean plane of existence,Footnote 48 to which the digging of pits created an interface. Hill’s work on later prehistoric pits and pit fill emphasised the structured nature of deposition and the associations between finds, arguing that material was set down ‘during irregular rituals which engraved a cosmology into the physical lives of Iron Age people’.Footnote 49 Perhaps, if pit 5013 had been among the first dug at Winterborne Kingston, either to preserve grain or other perishables or to hold a foundation deposit for the banjo enclosure, then it may have required a particularly special offering.

Human sacrifice

Sk-04 was a woman aged in her late twenties, stable isotopes indicating that she may not have spent her childhood in the immediate area of Winterborne Kingston but could have originated elsewhere within central southern England. The positioning of upper limbs suggested a person of slim build, while a combination of pronounced muscle attachments and extensive degenerative changes in her spine tell a story of repeated physical exertion, consistent with a hard-working life. A few weeks before death, she suffered an impact to the chest, either accidentally or through deliberate assault, sufficient to fracture one of her ribs. She appears to have been killed by another human, as evidenced by an unhealed blade incision to her neck, possibly while her hands were tied (apparently at the wrist, in front of the body), placement in the pit being the reason for her death rather than as a response to it.

Bioarchaeological evidence for Iron Age violence, based on the analysis of skeletons recorded from central southern Britain, has been much discussed in recent years.Footnote 50 In considering remains from Dorset, Redfern has noted trauma patterns broadly consistent with aggressive acts of both interpersonal (conflict) and domestic (intimate partner) origin, concluding that, for younger Iron Age females, ‘mortality and risk of violence were inextricably connected’.Footnote 51 Were it not for the structured deposit of animal bone beneath Sk-04, the nature of her demise, when coupled with observations made about her hard-working, injury-filled later life, could be taken as evidence for domestic abuse and/or murder. The circumstances and context of her disposal, however, strongly suggest that her existence ended dramatically in an act of premeditated ritualised violence.

Attempts to map claims made by classical sources, regarding human sacrifice practised in Britain and Gaul,Footnote 52 onto prehistoric archaeological remains have met with limited success,Footnote 53 notable exceptions being pits containing disarticulated and multiple inhumations at Danebury hillfort in Hampshire.Footnote 54 Signs of severe trauma, displaying penetrative injuries in the form of spear thrusts and sword blows together with decapitation and knife cuts ‘of a kind that might have resulted from scalping’,Footnote 55 have variously been interpreted as evidence for combat, execution, ritual killing, butchery or cannibalism.Footnote 56 Re-examination of the human remains here has shown the full extent of peri-mortem mutilation and dismemberment, further suggesting a ‘denigration of the deceased’.Footnote 57 The homogenous nature of weapons-induced trauma apparent on the mandibles of two juvenile skulls from pit 2509, consistent with decapitation at the level of the second and third cervical vertebrae, when combined with their simultaneous disposal, argues strongly for a case of execution or ritualised killing.Footnote 58

It is possible that Sk-04 represents a southern British version of the kind of treatment revealed in well-preserved later Iron Age bog bodies.Footnote 59 In Cheshire, ‘Lindow Man’ (Lindow ii) suffered a violent death, injuries recorded including lacerations to the crown and scalp caused by a blunt-edged weapon, fracture dislocation of neck vertebrae, a broken rib, a possible stab wound to the upper right chest, an incisional injury to the throat and strangulation with a sinew loop.Footnote 60 Aldhouse-Green has discussed the problem of discerning whether such ‘bog burials’ were individuals dispatched by their own communities or members of outsider-groups put to death as ‘foreigners’,Footnote 61 observing that the ‘kernel of human substitution is the notion that the surrogate is of less value, lesser importance and more dispensable’.Footnote 62 Those selected for such treatment could therefore perhaps have been thought of as possessing low or marginal social status, being ‘criminals, poor people, slaves, foreigners or children’.Footnote 63 Caesar’s oft cited comment on Gallic society references a class of individual existing in a state of servitude ‘for the commonality is held almost in the condition of slaves’.Footnote 64 While the latter point could be interpreted as describing a class akin to medieval serfs, Strabo’s account of the Britons is specific about enslaved captives being traded or sold from British shores in the Late Iron Age.Footnote 65

Evidence for the arduous life and apparent physical mistreatment of Sk-04 suggest someone lower down the social scale against whom acts of violence may have been considered broadly acceptable. On this basis it is plausible to speculate that her status could be that of a prisoner or captive servile, a point perhaps reinforced by the observation that her wrists were possibly tied at the moment of death. It should, of course, be noted that tightly flexed positioning, consistent with the body having been tied or bound, is a common feature in many British Later Iron Age burials.Footnote 66 Whether such binding relates to funerary practice, corpses being wrapped in a shroud to prepare for internment,Footnote 67 or to fettering/bondageFootnote 68 is not always clear. Given the relative prevalence of joined or crossed wrists in Iron Age inhumations, we cannot automatically view placement of hands as proof of enslavement and/or prisoner sacrifice. The combination, in SK-04, of unusual body placement, trauma and conjoined wrists, however, can reasonably be taken to suggest forcible restraint.

The stable isotope values obtained for Sk-04 would principally be taken to relate to a diet in which the majority of protein was obtained from animal sources. The nitrogen value (δ15N:10‰) is comparable with individuals who had received formal burial, both within the same settlement area of Winterborne Kingston and elsewhere in Dorset. For example, a young woman with a particularly well-furnished burial, excavated over 30km away at Langton Herring, Dorset, returned a δ15N value of 10.31‰.Footnote 69 For the latter, it was suggested that this relatively high value could relate to the respective individual having held high social status.Footnote 70 Notwithstanding the possibility of these two burials being separated in time (by anything up to three centuries), elevated nitrogen values have also been observed in individuals suffering from malnourishment, such high values having been identified as part of an isotopic signature of periods of biological stress and/or starvation.Footnote 71 Given the other aspects of Sk-04, as discussed, this latter result might therefore be a further indicator that this individual lived in difficult circumstances and was at the lower end of the social scale.

Human and animal associations

The positioning of Sk-04, face down in intimate contact with a large quantity of weathered animal bone, lends itself to more than one interpretation. If the manner of burial related to some form of judicial punishment or revenge, then positioning might indicate slighting through a reversal or deviation from the norm, positioning the body so that the spirit or life essence might be directed down into an ‘underworld’ rather than finding its way to the destination expected for those in receipt of normative funerary treatment. Alternatively, the directing of an individual’s essence towards a chthonic realm might be consistent with the notion of a sacrifice, where the offering was intended to appease a supernatural subterranean entity, perhaps to give thanks for the harvest or to the safe storage of grain.Footnote 72 Such treatment would accord with the practice of placing special deposits in pits, something common in Iron Age sites across southern Britain where features contain the skeletons of complete and partial animals,Footnote 73 some of which were arguably killed for the purpose of burial rather than being butchered and eaten.

Articulated and semi-articulated deposits of animal bone encountered from prehistoric sites in Britain have been interpreted in a variety of ways,Footnote 74 including deliberate burials,Footnote 75 sacrificial offerings,Footnote 76 culled depositsFootnote 77 and butchery waste.Footnote 78 Identifying symbolic and ritual activity in the deposition of animal bones is fraught with difficulties,Footnote 79 not least because faunal remains may have multiple concurrent and dynamic meanings and roles prior to, during and after deposition.Footnote 80 Subsequent analysis of such remains has preferred the term ‘associated bone group’, something that offers a neutral starting point for analysis, recognising the problem of equifinality (many processes and activities result in the same outcome), encouraging deposits to be interpreted on a case by case basis and avoiding blanket interpretations based on superficial similarities.Footnote 81 Within the context of the Iron Age, associated bone groups (ABGs) have been well-documented and discussed,Footnote 82 being defined within three broad categories: remains deposited with flesh or connective tissue attached; remains of a single animal disarticulated through post-deposition processes; and disarticulated remains of the same animal deposited in association.Footnote 83 The problem with bones discovered beneath Sk-04 at Winterborne Kingston, however, is that these were neither articulated nor in close association, significant time having elapsed between death and deposition in the pit.

Although the deliberate arrangement of weathered, disarticulated animal remains from pit 5013 differs from the majority of identified ABGs, it may be a related phenomenon sharing similar ritualised interpretations such as propitiatory offerings,Footnote 84 mnemonic compositionsFootnote 85 or the final disposal of ‘ritually charged rubbish’.Footnote 86 It is possible, of course, that the bone spread in pit 5013 had originally been in a state of articulation elsewhere (as an ABG), only later being disturbed for secondary manipulation into a discrete stack or platform. Interestingly, this possible sequence of articulated ABGs being subsequently exhumed and redeposited after a period of exposure and removal of elements is similar to that proposed for the treatment of human remains at Danebury and Suddern Farm.Footnote 87 The significance of the pit 5013 stack is enhanced by the observation that the layout of remains was not random, having been subject to deliberate selection (foreshadowing the placement of human remains), a horse skull and two cattle mandibles located directly beneath the head of Sk-04, forelimb bones of horse located in the middle and bones from the hindquarters and feet of horse and cattle at the southernmost end.

An immediate comparison can perhaps be drawn with a bone deposit, dated either to the third to first century bc Footnote 88 or the turn of the first century bc/ad,Footnote 89 from pit 5 inside an enclosed Iron Age settlement at Viables Farm, Hampshire.Footnote 90 This comprised the extended skeleton of a young female, aged between twenty-five and thirty, on her back and an older female, aged between thirty-five and forty, lying on her left side in a crouched position, head ‘resting on the pelvis’ of the former.Footnote 91 The positioning of the older female at the feet of the younger, in an apparently ‘subservient position’,Footnote 92 has been taken to indicate that the burial was a form of ‘retainer sacrifice’.Footnote 93 Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that the two bodies were contemporary, both may simply have been using pit 5 at different times. Certainly, the crouched female looks like a later, more formal piece of body disposal, one possibly set down with grave goods,Footnote 94 by mourners who were unconnected to (and largely unaware of) any earlier phase of deposition. With this possible secondary burial removed, the remains of the younger female, lying on her back, legs apart and right arm outstretched, has a more carelessly thrown appearance, not unlike Sk-04 at Winterborne Kingston.

Beneath the Viables Farm skeleton, the complete remains of two sheep (an immature and an adult ewe), the larger portion of a horse and the partial remains of another horse and two cows were found.Footnote 95 It is clear that, although these faunal remains did not comprise a layer of weathered bone, both sheep having been deposited whole as freshly killed animals and the horse and cow having been partially butchered and skinned,Footnote 96 the layout broadly mirrored that of pit 5013 at Winterborne Kingston, where an extended human skeleton followed the basic orientation as animal remains below.Footnote 97 Certainly the deposition of ‘two of each of three key domestic species’ at Viables Farm appears significant,Footnote 98 the placement of butchered cow and horse carcasses further possibly indicating a broader communal event in which the ritualised killing of animals completed a ceremony with feasting.Footnote 99 Themes of paired or mirrored human and animal bodies and body parts, noted in different ways at Winterborne Kingston and Viables Farm, may also be apparent at Blewburton Hill in Oxfordshire, where the skeletons of a female horse, male dog and elderly female human were recovered from the basal levels of a hillfort ditch.Footnote 100 The horse, with its neck resting against the outer edge of the ditch, head twisted back across the withers, lay on its left side, the human placed between its front and hind legs, spine parallel to the animal with ‘one leg over and the other under the horse’s hindquarters’.Footnote 101 Although originally interpreted as a rider cast into the ditch with feet tied under the horse as an extreme double sacrifice,Footnote 102 it seems more likely that both died, or were slain, elsewhere and only later placed together as a structured form of deposit.Footnote 103

A better parallel for Winterborne Kingston and Viables Farm, suggesting a direct association between human and animal remains, can be found at the Prebendal in Buckinghamshire. Here, an irregular hollow that preceded the construction of a middle Iron Age hillfort contained five sets of human skeletal remains in articulation,Footnote 104 with disarticulated bone from a minimum of four other individuals.Footnote 105 Radiocarbon dates suggest deposition in the early fourth century bc,Footnote 106 although it is not known whether these were all contemporary. Human 1, a twelve-year-old child, lay supine, legs over the remains of seven partial, albeit articulated, skeletons of sheep/goat,Footnote 107 two of which, an adult female goat and a young sheep, had their necks bent back, suggesting deposition very soon after death.Footnote 108 Elsewhere, a sheep skeleton was noted with Human 2 (a juvenile in their late teens) and 3 (a mature adult female), the animal’s rib cage lying on top of the right humerus of Human 2, bent neck vertebrae lying beneath the right foot bones of Human 3. The skull of an adult ewe was also found partly under the pelvis of Human 3,Footnote 109 while partial skeletons of a pig and two sheep, plus fragments of sheep skull were found with Human 4 (a four-year-old child).Footnote 110 It would be tempting to interpret the sheep/goat remains from the Prebendal, the high number of which may indicate selection from several flocks, as feasting residue, were it not for the sparse evidence for butchery.Footnote 111

Sacrifice as spectacle?

Something that may have significance, in light of the treatment received by Sk-04, is the observation that the human remains and underlying animal bone were set to one side of pit 5013. Unless Sk-04 had simply been dropped in from above, space would have been required for those placing the body in the pit, something that may in turn explain the off-centre positioning. It is plausible, in this respect, that one or more other people were standing in the feature, holding or restraining Sk-04 at the point of death, the confines of the pit helping to frame a performative space, audience observing from above. The stratigraphic sequence, as recorded in the east–west section of pit 5013, with the deposit of animal bones lying directly over context 5177 (the basal fill of the feature) and the westernmost edge of fill 5035, may however suggest a different interpretation, the presence of layer 5035 entering the pit from the east side, possibly indicating that the pit had already been partially backfilled at the time both animal and human remains were introduced. Soil material falling, or being shovelled, into the feature would leave an unfilled area along its western side which, if true, could indicate that the animal bones were placed at the bottom of a partially filled pit, perhaps to provide a ‘bed’ onto which the victim, having been mortally injured at the uppermost edge of the feature, could then be pushed down on to.

However the formation of the animal bone layer in pit 5013 is interpreted, it is clear that the material created a discrete stack or platform. The restricted, semi-subterranean nature of this, comprising a deposit not unlike those of compacted chalk observed within Later Bronze Age sites at East Chisenbury and All Cannings Cross in Wiltshire,Footnote 112 ‘whose luminosity and surface quality provided a vehicle for display’,Footnote 113 could be viewed as a form of stage, weathered bone standing out against the darker soil of primary pit fill. The creation of such a performance space would have generated a distinct social dynamic, separating participants from audience in a very physical sense, further helping spectators focus their attention on the unique nature of the drama as it unfolded.Footnote 114

Sacrifice as spectacle is well-attested within the literature of the ancient Mediterranean, the process often involving processions (of animals, religious officials and worshippers), prayers, chanting, music and ecstatic dance.Footnote 115 In the majority of cases, ritualised execution was intended as a collective event, witnessed by the community, whose shared participation and assumption of joint responsibility provided both excitement and release.Footnote 116 The consumption of flesh, within the context of a communal meal or feast, would have further enhanced the collective experience of a group, providing a ceremony or social event in which both gods and worshippers participated through the sharing of ‘meat, nourishment and conviviality’.Footnote 117 The layer of animal bones found beneath Sk-04, although presumably indicating consumption of domesticates, does not appear to have been intimately connected with human sacrifice, at least in the form of a contemporary feast, the remains displaying clear evidence of weathering and gnawing consistent with having lain exposed for a long period. If the bone was residue from a series of discrete meals, rather than a single phase of slaughter/feasting, then this must have occurred some significant time prior to the killing of SK-04, albeit recent enough for the residue to be both remembered and accessible.

Disturbance/redeposition of animal bone in pit 5013 could perhaps have been a deliberate act of desecration: an essential part of the disposal by the local community of a devalued or marginalised individual. In such a scenario, the placing of the body directly onto a reordered bone pile could represent the ultimate act of disrespect, close contact with such remains in a burial context being considered unclean; a specially reserved insult for the socially polluted going beyond death. In such a context, Sk-04 may have acted as a scapegoat, execution serving to bear away perceived sins or impurities ascribed to the wider community.Footnote 118 Sacrifice of such an individual in the pit could have provided a degree of catharsis, restoring perceptions of order and cohesion to a group by recreating and reinforcing the social system.Footnote 119 Alternatively, the death of the woman and the subsequent placement of her body in the pit may suggest this was a blood-sacrifice in which the killer (or killers) intended human life to dissipate into the dismembered remains of domesticates consumed by the wider community at an earlier time. The sudden flow of blood from the throat of the victim directly into the bone and soil could have been a transformative process providing a degree of physical and supernatural nourishment to the ground.Footnote 120 Added to this would be the, no doubt, ‘visceral effect and spectacle’Footnote 121 generated by a theatrical kill, a shocking and ‘adrenalizing drama’Footnote 122 set within the context of a tightly contained, partially subterranean space.

A very similar performative concept may have been behind the assault detected on the later Iron Age individual Lindow ii, who, among other injuries sustained in his final moments, had his throat cut with a sharp-edged weapon, the forward flow of blood being accentuated by the application of a length of animal sinew around the neck, tightened, probably with a piece of wood, like a tourniquet.Footnote 123 Such a stage-managed, ritualised execution would, for an audience, no doubt have been ‘morbidly thrilling, coruscating even in the squeezing, wringing, wounding bloodshed it wrought’.Footnote 124 In the case of Sk-04, violent demise and forceful forward placement, directing the dark-red life essence down onto the weathered, white bone stack, may have been intended as a dramatic way of ensuring the future fertility of community domesticates or, perhaps, in the hope of somehow bringing existence back to dismembered, disarticulated animal body parts.

CONCLUSONS

Pit 5013 lends itself to utilitarian interpretation as a ‘simple’ storage pit, dug with the intention of being a repository for structured and sacrificial deposits once decommissioned. The absence of environmental evidence for use as such could, however, equally suggest that it was dug for entirely ritual purposes, with no intent to store grain or other foodstuffs, perhaps acting as an interface to a perceived underworld (although such interpretations need not be mutually exclusive). Rather than being furnished with grave goods, the woman’s final disposal, face down near to the base of the pit, appears more consistent with being a part of a votive deposit, comprised largely of dismembered and reordered animal bone. She experienced physical hardship, had been exposed to risk of injury, her life ending in a violent, highly ritualised manner. As discussed, multiple interpretations for this unusual combination are certainly possible, but the suggestion that appears most plausible is the sacrifice of a marginalised individual, ascribed as low in status and therefore perceived to be in some way perhaps more ‘dispensable’ than other members of the community.

To date, although animal and human sacrifice in the British Iron Age has frequently been inferred,Footnote 125 archaeology has been largely unable to supply much in the way of evidence either for ritualised killing or for the context of such activity. The nature of the 5013 pit deposit at Winterborne Kingston is therefore of considerable significance as it appears to provide a narrative, not just for the human victim of sacrifice, but also the nature of their demise and final placement, providing, for the first time, a specific context for the highly theatrical nature of an Iron Age community-sanctioned murder.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581524000143.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to a wider team of staff who have been fundamental to the project throughout, in particular Elizabeth Craig-Atkins, Gabrielle Delbarre, Damian Evans, Harry Manley, Megan Russell and Dave Stewart. We are grateful to our host Rebecca Hill for permitting and facilitating all aspects of the fieldwork. Geochemical isotope analysis was conducted by Jane Evans, Doris Wagner and Kotryna Savickaite (National Environmental Isotope Facility, British Geological Survey). Thank you also to Tracey Minnal, Hannah Macaulay and Kelsi Whitwood for the skilful excavation and recording of Sk-04 and for the anonymous reviewers whose comments helped improve this paper.

Footnotes

1. The excavations were part of Bournemouth University’s undergraduate field school: Russell et al Reference Russell, Cheetham, Evans, Hambleton, Hewitt, Manley and Smith2014, 219–20.

3. Lang Reference Lang2016, 357.

4. Ibid, 341.

5. McOmish Reference McOmish2011, 2; Lang Reference Lang2016, 347–9.

6. 2146±29 bp (UBA-45874). Sample taken from left M2 mandible by 14CHRONO, Centre for Climate, the Environment and Chronology, School of Geography, Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen’s University of Belfast.

8. Whimster Reference Whimster1981, 253–72; Papworth Reference Papworth2008, 82–6; Sharples Reference Sharples2010, 277–80; Harding Reference Harding2016, 83–7; Russell et al Reference Russell, Smith, Cheetham, Evans and Manley2019, 222–5.

11. Booth and Madgwick Reference Booth and Madgwick2016.

14. Duday Reference Duday2009.

15. McKinley Reference McKinley2004.

16. Including features of the skull listed by Acsádi and Nemeskéri Reference Acsádi and Nemeskéri1970 and the indicative aspects of the innominates cited by Buikstra and Ubelaker Reference Buikstra and Ubelaker1994; Bruzek Reference Bruzek2002; Walker Reference Walker2005; Karsten Reference Karsten2017.

17. Use of her/she in the current paper refers to the individual’s biological sex, rather than denoting any assumption regarding gender presentation.

18. Buckberry and Chamberlain Reference Buckberry and Chamberlain2002.

20. Meindl and Lovejoy Reference Meindl and Lovejoy1985.

21. Brothwell Reference Brothwell1981.

24. Ortner Reference Ortner2003, 550.

27. Baiu and Spain Reference Baiu and Spain2019.

29. Brickley Reference Brickley2006.

30. Galloway Reference Galloway1999, 107.

33. Measured as 5238µm × 1546µm using a Keyence VHX5000 digital microscope.

34. A three-dimensional digital model of the vertebra and cut feature produced by photogrammetry is available as a supplementary file accompanying this article online.

35. Schlect Reference Schlect2012.

36. Lyman Reference Lyman1994, 298; Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews Reference Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews2016, 26–30.

37. Lyman Reference Lyman1994, 213; Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews Reference Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews2016, 31–2.

38. Lyman Reference Lyman1994, 354–8; Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews Reference Fernandez-Jalvo and Andrews2016, 201–5.

39. Behrensmeyer Reference Behrensmeyer1978.

40. Ibid.

41. Ibid.

42. Gnawing being both the earliest occurring and most common of taphonomic processes: Madgwick Reference Madgwick2010, 67–8.

44. Booth and Madgwick Reference Booth and Madgwick2016.

45. Bersu Reference Bersu1940, 50; Reynolds Reference Reynolds1974.

47. Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1992.

49. Hill Reference Hill1995, 126.

51. Redfern Reference Redfern2008, 154.

52. Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 82–6.

53. Ibid, 87–9; Armit Reference Armit2012, 10–11, 48–53, 205–7, 218–20; Harding Reference Harding2016, 22–4, 97, 198–203.

54. Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1983, 105–6; Walker Reference Walker and Cunliffe1984, 461–3.

55. Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1993, 53.

56. Hooper in Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1984, 465–73; Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1995, 76, Reference Cunliffe2003, 74–7, 149–56.

57. Craig et al Reference Craig, Knüsel and Carr2005, 174–6.

58. Ibid, 170.

61. Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 15.

62. Ibid, 29; Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green, Parker Pearson and Thorpe2005, 156.

63. Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 29; Giles Reference Giles2020, 208.

64. Hammond Reference Hammond1996: Caesar, The Gallic Wars, 6.13.

65. Jones Reference Jones1928: Strabo, Geography, 4.5.2.

66. Whimster Reference Whimster1981, 253–72.

71. Beaumont and Montgomery Reference Beaumont and Montgomery2016.

75. Wheeler Reference Wheeler1943, 115.

77. Maltby Reference Maltby1981.

78. Maltby Reference Maltby1985.

79. Wilson Reference Wilson1992.

81. Hill Reference Hill1995, 27; Morris Reference Morris2010, 12.

83. Morris Reference Morris2010, 12.

84. Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1992.

85. Randall Reference Randall2010.

87. Booth and Madgwick Reference Booth and Madgwick2016.

88. Millett and Russell Reference Millett and Russell1982, 87–8.

89. Gibson Reference Gibson2004, 2, 26.

91. Millett and Russell Reference Millett and Russell1982, 69–73.

92. Ibid, 87.

93. Harding Reference Harding2016, 203.

94. Notably the two bone combs, pieces of sawn red deer antler and terrets of antler and silvered bronze: Millett and Russell Reference Millett and Russell1982, 81–7.

95. Maltby in Millett and Russell Reference Millett and Russell1982, 75–80.

96. Ibid, 80.

97. Millett and Russell Reference Millett and Russell1982, 69.

98. Harding Reference Harding2016, 255.

99. Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 34–5.

100. Collins 1952, 31; Bendrey et al Reference Bendrey, Leach and Clark2010, 34–7; Harding Reference Harding2016, 254–5.

101. Bendrey et al Reference Bendrey, Leach and Clark2010, 34.

102. Collins 1952, 31.

103. Harding Reference Harding2016, 255.

104. Farley and Jones Reference Farley and Jones2012, 22–8.

105. Ibid, 74.

106. Ibid, 29.

107. Ibid, 33–4.

108. Ibid, 34.

109. Ibid, 35.

110. Ibid, 35–6.

111. Ibid, 69.

113. Waddington Reference Waddington2010, 113.

114. Pearson and Shanks Reference Pearson and Shanks2001, 69; Waddington Reference Waddington2010, 112–13.

115. Van Straten Reference Van Straten1995, 13–102.

116. Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 34–5.

117. Ibid, 40.

119. Smith and Doniger Reference Smith and Doniger1989; Janowitz Reference Janowitz2011.

120. Durand Reference Durand, Detienne and Vernant1989, 119–28; Aldhouse-Green Reference Aldhouse-Green2001, 39–40.

121. Giles Reference Giles2020, 207–8.

122. Giles Reference Giles2015, 548.

124. Giles Reference Giles2020, 208.

125. Cunliffe Reference Cunliffe1992 and Reference Cunliffe1995, 100–5; Sharples Reference Sharples2010, 238–40, 251–72.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Acsádi, G and Nemeskéri, J 1970. A History of the Human Life Span and Mortality, Akadémiai Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
Aggrawal, N, Kaur, R, Kumar, S and Mathur, D 1979. ‘A study of changes in the spine in weight-lifters and other athletes’, Brit J Sports Med, 13, 5861 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aldhouse-Green, M 2001. Dying for the Gods, The History Press, Stroud Google Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M 2004. ‘Chaining and shaming: images of defeat, from Llyn Cerrig Bach to Sarmitzegetusa’, Oxford J Archaeol, 23, 319–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldhouse-Green, M 2005. ‘Ritual bondage, violence, slavery and sacrifice in later European prehistory’, in Parker Pearson, M and Thorpe, I (eds), Warfare, Violence and Slavery in Prehistory: proceedings of a Prehistoric Society conference at Sheffield University, 155–63, Oxbow, Oxford Google Scholar
Ananthakrishnan, G, Alagappan, D and Riyat, M 2006. ‘Rib fractures in an adult male: unusual presentation of a victim of domestic violence’, Injury Extra, 37, 428–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S and Boyle, K (eds) 1996. Ritual Treatment of Human and Animal Remains: proceedings of the first meeting of the Osteoarchaeological Research Group, Oxbow, Oxford Google Scholar
Armit, I 2012. Headhunting and the Body in Iron Age Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiu, I and Spain, D 2019. ‘Rib fractures’, J Am Med Ass, 321, 1,836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baray, L and Boulestin, B 2010. Morts Anormaux et Sépultures Bizarres, Université de Dijon, DijonGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, J and Montgomery, J 2016. ‘The great Irish famine: identifying starvation in the tissues of victims using stable isotope analysis of bone and incremental dentine collagen’, PLoS One, 11 (8), e0160065 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrensmeyer, A 1978. ‘Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering’, Paleobiology, 4 (2), 150–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendrey, R, Leach, S and Clark, K 2010. ‘New light on an old rite: analysis of an Iron Age burial group from Blewburton Hill, Oxfordshire’, in Morris and Maltby 2010, 33–44Google Scholar
Bersu, G 1940. ‘Excavations at Little Woodbury, Wiltshire. Part 1: the settlement as revealed by excavation’, Proc Prehist Soc, 6, 30111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, T and Madgwick, R 2016. ‘New evidence for diverse secondary burial practices in Iron Age Britain: a histological case study’, J Archaeol Sci, 67, 1424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brickley, M 2006. ‘Rib fractures in the archaeological record: a useful source of sociocultural information?’, Int J Osteoarchaeol, 16, 6175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothwell, D 1981. Digging up Bones, British Museum (Natural History), LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothwell, D and Gill-Robinson, H 2002. ‘Taphonomic and forensic aspects of bog bodies’, in Haglund, W and Sorg, N (eds), Advances in Forensic Taphonomy, 119–31, CRC, Boca Raton Google Scholar
Bruzek, J 2002. ‘A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone’, Am J Physical Anthrop, 117, 157–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckberry, J and Chamberlain, A 2002. ‘Age estimation from the auricular surface of the ilium: a revised method’, Am J Physical Anthrop, 119, 231–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buikstra, J and Ubelaker, D 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains, Arkansas Archaeological Society, FayettevilleGoogle Scholar
Cappella, A, de Boer, H, Cammilli, P, De Angelis, D, Messina, C, Sconfienza, L, Sardanelli, F, Sforza, C and Cattaneo, C 2019. ‘Histologic and radiological analysis on bone fractures: estimation of post-traumatic survival time in skeletal trauma’, Forensic Sci Int, 302, 109909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A 1952. ‘Excavations on Blewburton Hill, 1947’, Berkshire Archaeol J, 50, 2164 Google Scholar
Craig, R, Knüsel, C and Carr, G 2005. ‘Fragmentation, mutilation and dismemberment: an interpretation of human remains on Iron Age sites’, in M Parker Pearson I Thorpe (eds), Warfare, Violence and Slavery in Prehistory : proceedings of a Prehistoric Society conference at Sheffield University, 165–80, Oxbow, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B 1983. Danebury Hillfort: anatomy of an Iron Age hillfort. Excavations 1969–82, Batsford, London Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B 1984. Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Volume 2: the excavations 1969–1978: the finds, Council for British Archaeology, London Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B 1992. ‘Pits, preconceptions and propitiation in the British Iron Age’, Oxford J Archaeol, 11, 6983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B 1993. Wessex to AD 1000, Routledge, London Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B 1995. Iron Age Britain, Batsford, London Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B 2003. Danebury Hillfort, Tempus, Stroud Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B and Poole, C (eds) 1995. Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. Volume 6: a hillfort community in perspective, Council for British Archaeology, London Google Scholar
Cunnington, M 1923. The Early Iron Age Inhabited Site at All Cannings Cross Farm, Wiltshire, George Simpson and Co, DevizesGoogle Scholar
Duday, H 2009. The Archaeology of the Dead: lectures in archaeothanatology, Oxbow Books, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, J 1989. ‘Greek animals: a typology of edible bodies’, in Detienne, M and Vernant, J (eds), The Cuisine of Sacrifice Among the Greeks, 87118, University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
Farley, M and Jones, G 2012. Iron Age Ritual, a Hillfort and Evidence for a Minster at Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, Oxbow, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasham, P 1987. A Banjo Enclosure in Micheldever Wood, Hampshire Field Club, Gloucester Google Scholar
Fernandez-Jalvo, Y and Andrews, P 2016. Atlas of Taphonomic Identifications: 1001+ images of fossil and recent mammal bone modification, Springer, Dordrecht CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, A 1999. Broken Bones: anthropological analysis of blunt force trauma, Charles C Thomas, Springfield Google Scholar
Gerdau-Radonic, K, Sperrevik, J, Smith, M, Cheetham, P and Russell, M 2021. ‘Deathways of the Durotriges: reconstructing identity through archaeothanatology in later Iron Age southern Britain’, in Schotsman, E and Knüsel, C (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Archaeothanatology, 243–62, Routledge, London Google Scholar
Gibson, C 2004. ‘The Iron Age and Roman site of Viables Two (Jays Close), Basingstoke’, Proc Hampshire Field Club and Archaeol Soc, 59, 130 Google Scholar
Giles, M 2015. ‘Performing pain, performing beauty: dealing with difficult death in Iron Age burials’, Cambridge Archaeol J, 25, 539–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, M 2020. Bog Bodies: face to face with the past, Manchester University Press, Manchester CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A 1984. ‘Survival or sacrifice? A critical appraisal of animal burials in Britain in the Iron Age’, in Grigson, C and Clutton-Brock, J (eds), Animals and Archaeology. 4: husbandry in Europe, 221–7, BAR Int Ser 227, Archaeopress, Oxford Google Scholar
Hambleton, E 2008. Review of Middle Bronze Age: Late Iron Age faunal assemblages from southern Britain, Research Department Report Series no 71-2008, English Heritage, Portsmouth Google Scholar
Hambleton, E 2013. ‘The life of things long dead: a biography of Iron Age animal skulls from Battlesbury Bowl, Wiltshire’, Cambridge Archaeol J, 23, 477–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, C (ed) 1996. Julius Caesar: the Gallic Wars, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Harding, D 2016. Death and Burial in Iron Age Britain, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Hill, J 1995. Ritual and Rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record, BAR Brit Ser 242, Tempus Reparatum, Oxford Google Scholar
Hill, J 1996. ‘The identification of ritual deposits of animals: a general perspective from a specific study of “special animal deposits” from the Southern English Iron Age’, in Anderson, S and Boyle, K (eds), Ritual Treatment of Human and Animal Remains. 1732, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
İşcan, M and Loth, S 1989. ‘Morphological assessment of age in the adult: the thoracic region’, in İşcan, M (ed), Age Markers in the Human Skeleton, 105–35, Charles C Thomas, Springfield Google Scholar
Janowitz, N 2011. ‘Inventing the scapegoat: theories of sacrifice and ritual’, J Ritual Stud, 25, 1524 Google Scholar
Jones, H 1928. Strabo: Geography, Heinemann, London Google Scholar
Karangelis, D, Karkos, C, Tagarakis, G, Oikonomou, K, Karkos, P, Papadopoulos, D, Hevas, A and Tsilimingas, N 2011. ‘Thoracic injuries resulting from intimate partner violence’, J Forensic and Legal Medicine, 18, 119–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karsten, J 2017. ‘A test of the preauricular sulcus as an indicator of sex’, Am J Physical Anthrop, 10, 15 Google Scholar
Kerr-Valentic, M, Arthur, M, Mullins, R, Pearson, T and Mayberry, J 2003. ‘Rib fracture pain and disability: can we do better?’, J Trauma, 54, 1,058–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopytoff, I 1986. ‘The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process’, in Appadurai, A (ed), The Social Life of Things: commodities in cultural perspective, 6492, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A 2016. ‘Defining banjo enclosures: investigations, interpretations and understanding in the Iron Age of southern Britain’, Proc Prehist Soc, 82, 341–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynnerup, N 2009. ‘Methods in mummy research’, Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 67, 357–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madgwick, R 2008. ‘Patterns in the modification of animal and human bones in Iron Age Wessex: revisiting the excarnation debate’, in Davis, O, Sharples, N and Waddington, K (eds), Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC, 99118, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
Madgwick, R 2010. ‘Bone modification and the conceptual relationship between humans and animals in Iron Age Wessex’, in Morris and Maltby 2010, 66–82Google Scholar
Maltby, M 1981. ‘The animal bones’, in S Davies ‘The excavations at Old Down Farm, Andover. Part 2: prehistoric and Roman’, Proc Hampshire Field Club, 37, 147–53Google Scholar
Maltby, M 1985. ‘The animal bones’, in P Fasham (ed), The Prehistoric Settlement at Winnall Down, Winchester, 97–125, Hampshire Field Club Monogr 2, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J 2004. ‘Compiling a skeletal inventory: disarticulated and co-mingled remains’, in M Brickley and J McKinley (eds), Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains, 14–17, BABAO/IFAGoogle Scholar
McOmish, D 1996. ‘East Chisenbury: ritual and rubbish at the British Bronze Age–Iron Age transition’, Antiquity, 70, 6876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McOmish, D 2011. Introductions to Heritage Assets: banjo enclosures, English Heritage, London Google Scholar
McOmish, D, Field, D and Brown, G 2010. ‘The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age midden site at East Chisenbury, Wiltshire’, Wiltshire Archaeol and Nat Hist Mag, 103, 35101Google Scholar
Meindl, R and Lovejoy, C 1985. ‘Ectocranial suture closure: a revised method for the determination of skeletal age at death based on the lateral-anterior sutures’, Am J Physical Anthrop, 68, 5766 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millett, M and Russell, D 1982. ‘An Iron Age burial from Viables Farm, Basingstoke’, Archaeol J, 139, 6990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, M and Russell, D 1984. ‘An Iron Age and Romano-British site at Viables Farm, Basingstoke’, Proc Hampshire Field Club and Archaeol Soc, 40, 4960 Google Scholar
Morris, J 2008. ‘Associated bone groups: one archaeologist’s rubbish is another’s ritual deposition’, in Davis, O, Sharples, N and Waddington, K (eds), Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC, 8398, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
Morris, J 2010. ‘Associated bone groups: beyond the Iron Age’, in Morris and Maltby 2010, 12–23Google Scholar
Morris, J 2011. Investigating Animal Burials: ritual, mundane and beyond, BAR Brit Ser 535, Archaeopress, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J 2018. ‘Animal biographies in the Iron Age of Wessex: Winnall Down, UK, revisited’, in Livarda, A, Madgwick, R and Riera Mora, S (eds), The Bioarchaeology of Ritual and Religion, 115–28, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
Morris, J and Maltby, M (eds) 2010. Integrating Social and Environmental Archaeologies: reconsidering deposition, BAR Int Ser 2077, Archaeopress, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Day, S, Neer, W and Ervynck, A (eds) 2004. Behaviour Beyond Bones: the zooarchaeology of ritual, religion, status and identity, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
Ortner, D 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains, Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
Papworth, M 2008. Deconstructing the Durotriges: a definition of Iron Age communities within the Dorset environs, BAR Brit Ser 462, Oxbow Books, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, M and Shanks, M 2001. Theatre/Archaeology, Routledge, London Google Scholar
Perry, B 1986. ‘Excavations at Bramdean, Hampshire, 1983 and 1984, with some further discussion of the ‘banjo’ syndrome’, Proc Hampshire Field Club and Archaeol Soc, 42, 3542 Google Scholar
Randall, C 2010. ‘More ritual rubbish? Exploring the taphonomic history, context formation processes and “specialness” of deposits including human and animal bone in Iron Age pits’, in Morris and Maltby 2010, 83102 Google Scholar
Redfern, R 2008. ‘A bioarchaeological analysis of violence in Iron Age females: a perspective from Dorset, England (mid to late seventh century BC to the first century AD)’, in O Davis, N Sharples and K Waddington (eds), Changing Perspectives on the First Millennium BC, 139–60, Oxbow Books, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R 2009. ‘Does cranial trauma provide evidence for projectile weaponry in Late Iron Age Dorset?’, Oxford J Archaeol, 28, 399424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R 2010. ‘A bioarchaeological investigation of cultural change in Dorset, England (mid-to-late fourth century BC to the end of the fourth century AD)’, Britannia, 39, 161–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R 2011. ‘A re-appraisal of the evidence for violence in the Late Iron Age human remains from Maiden Castle hillfort, Dorset, England’, Proc Prehist Soc, 77, 111–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R 2012. ‘Violence as an aspect of the Durotriges female life course’, in Ralph, S (ed), The Archaeology of Violence: interdisciplinary approaches, 6397, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Redfern, R 2016a. ‘Identifying and interpreting domestic violence in archaeological human remains: a critical review of the evidence’, Int J Osteoarchaeol, 27 (1), 1334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R 2016b. ‘Mobility and incremental dental dietary analysis of seven elite individuals from Late Iron Age Dorset, England’, PAST, 83, 1113 Google Scholar
Redfern, R 2019. ‘Gendered violence in Late Iron Age and Roman Britain’, in Fibiger, L, Dwyer, P and Damousi, J (eds), The Cambridge World History of Violence, 320–41, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Redfern, R 2020. ‘Iron Age “predatory landscapes”: a bioarchaeological and funerary exploration of captivity and enslavement in Britain’, Cambridge Archaeol J, 30, 531–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, R and Hamlin, C 2022. ‘Burying the fallen at Maiden Castle, Dorset’, Proc Dorset Nat Hist and Archaeol Soc, 143, 149–70Google Scholar
Redfern, R, Hamlin, C, Beaumont, J, Jay, M, Montgomery, J, Nowell, G, Scollan, M and Clark, M 2021. ‘Acquiring skills, travelling to fight: mobility in Late Iron Age Dorset’, Proc Dorset Nat Hist and Archaeol Soc, 142, 156–83Google Scholar
Reynolds, P 1974. ‘Experimental Iron Age storage pits: an interim report’, Proc Prehist Soc, 40, 118–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, A 1968. ‘Shafts, pits, wells: sanctuaries of the Belgic Britons?’, in Coles, J and Simpson, D (eds), Studies in Ancient Europe, 255–85, Leicester University Press, Leicester Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P 2018. ‘Zooarchaeology and the elusive feast: from performance to aftermath’, World Archaeol, 50 (2), 221–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, M, Cheetham, P, Evans, D, Hambleton, E, Hewitt, I, Manley, H and Smith, M 2014. ‘The Durotriges Project, phase one: an interim statement’, Proc Dorset Nat Hist and Archaeol Soc, 135, 217–21Google Scholar
Russell, M, Cheetham, P, Evans, D, Gale, J, Hambleton, E, Hewitt, I, Manley, H, Pitman, D and Stewart, D 2016. ‘The Durotriges Project, phase three: an interim statement’, Proc Dorset Nat Hist and Archaeol Soc, 137, 173–7Google Scholar
Russell, M, Cheetham, P, Hewitt, I, Hambleton, E, Manley, H and Stewart, D 2017. ‘The Durotriges Project 2016: an interim statement’, Proc Dorset Nat Hist and Archaeol Soc, 138, 105–11Google Scholar
Russell, M, Smith, M, Cheetham, P, Evans, D and Manley, H 2019. ‘The girl with the chariot medallion: a well-furnished, Late Iron Age Durotrigian burial from Langton Herring, Dorset’, Archaeol J, 176, 196230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, A, Reginelli, A, Pignatiello, M, Cioce, F, Mazzei, G, Fabozzi, O, Parlato, V, Cappabianca, S and Giovine, S 2018. ‘Imaging of violence against the elderly and the women’, Seminars in Ultrasound and CT, 40, 1824 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, K and Crabtree, P (eds) 1995. The Symbolic Role of Animals in Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Res Paper 12, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlect, S 2012. ‘Understanding entheses: bridging the gap between clinical and anthropological perspectives’, Anatomical Rec, 295, 1,239–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharples, N 2010. Social Relations in Later Prehistory: Wessex in the first millennium BC, Oxford University Press, Oxford CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sîrbu, V 2008. ‘Ritual inhumations and “deposits of children” among the Geto-Dacians’, in Murphy, E (ed), Deviant Burial in the Archaeological Record, 7190, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
Smith, B and Doniger, W 1989. ‘Sacrifice and substitution: ritual mystification and mythical demystification’, Numen, 36, 189224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, M 1970. ‘Estimation of stature from intact long limb bones’, in Stewart, T (ed), Personal Identification in Mass Disasters, 7183, Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington Google Scholar
Van Straten, E 1995. Hiera Kala: images of animal sacrifice in Archaic and Classical Greece, E J Brill, Leiden CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddington, K 2010. ‘The politics of the everyday: exploring ‘midden’ space in Late Bronze Age Wiltshire’, in Morris and Maltby 2010, 103–18Google Scholar
Wagner, A, Murtagh, F, Arrington, J and Stallworth, D 2000. ‘Relationships of Schmorl’s nodes to vertebral body endplate fractures and acute endplate disk extrusions’, Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 276–81Google ScholarPubMed
Wainwright, G 1979. Gussage All Saints: an Iron Age settlement in Dorset, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London Google Scholar
Walker, L 1984. ‘Population and behaviour’, in Cunliffe, B (ed), Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. The excavations 1969–1978. Volume 2: the finds, Council for British Archaeology, London Google Scholar
Walker, P 2005. ‘Greater sciatic notch morphology: sex, age and population differences’, Am J Physical Anthrop, 127, 385–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West, I 1986. ‘Forensic aspects of Lindow Man’, in Stead, I, Bourke, J and Brothwell, D (eds), Lindow Man: the body in the bog, 7780, Book Club Associates, London Google Scholar
Wheeler, M 1943. Maiden Castle, Dorset, Society of Antiquaries Rep, SAL, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whimster, R 1981. Burial Practices in Iron Age Britain: a discussion and gazetteer of the evidence c 700 BC–AD 43, BAR Brit Seri 90, Oxbow Books, Oxford Google Scholar
White, T, Black, M and Folkens, P 2012. Human Osteology, Academic Press, London Google Scholar
Wilson, B 1992. ‘Considerations for the identification of ritual deposits of animal bones in Iron Age pits’, Int J Osteoarchaeol, 2, 341–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig 1. Map showing location of Winterbourne Kingston, Dorset, within the UK and Ireland.

Figure 1

Fig 2. The Iron Age banjo enclosure of Winterborne Kingston, Dorset, under excavation in 2011, looking due north through the entranceway to the interior. Photograph: © Adam Stanford for Bournemouth University.

Figure 2

Fig 3. Iron Age adult human female Sk-04 lying prone, face down, close to the base of cylindrical pit 5103 above a structured deposit of animal bone and the same deposit with human remains removed. Images facing west-south-west. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

Figure 3

Fig 4. Plan and section drawings of pit 5013, showing the location and position of Sk-04 and the underlying animal bone deposit, within the western portion of the feature. Images: © Bournemouth University.

Figure 4

Fig 5. Bones of the lumbar spine of Sk-04, showing degenerative changes in the form of marginal osteophytes (a) and (b) Schmorl’s nodes (focal necrotic destruction caused by herniated intervertebral discs). Photograph: © Bournemouth University.

Figure 5

Fig 6. The left fifth rib of Sk-04, with a fracture that was in the process of healing at the time of death. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

Figure 6

Fig 7. (a)–(c) show views of Sk-04’s second cervical vertebra (C2) with cutmarks to the left lamina – arrowed in (a) and (b); (d) shows the two cutmarks are aligned and so were made with a single movement of the blade; (e) shows the edge of the posterior incision; (f) scanning electron micrograph of the posterior cutmark, the dotted lines mark the point at which the incision ends and the kerf has opened further as a post mortem dehydration crack. Photographs: © Bournemouth University.

Figure 7

Fig 8. The trajectory of the incised trauma to vertebra C2. (a) lateral view showing angle in relation to the bones of the cervical spine; (b) and (c) superior view showing position of the cut in relation to adjacent soft tissue structures (images created using Anatomage Table software version 8.0).

Figure 8

Fig 9. Areas of southern Britain that cannot be excluded as a childhood origin for the human tooth sample from Sk-04 based on strontium and oxygen isotope compositions, with the site of Winterbourne Kingston circled. Map produced using the British Geological Survey biosphere isotope domain facility.

Supplementary material: File

Russell et al. supplementary material 1

Russell et al. supplementary material
Download Russell et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 123 KB
Supplementary material: File

Russell et al. supplementary material 2

Russell et al. supplementary material
Download Russell et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 29.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Russell et al. supplementary material 3

Russell et al. supplementary material
Download Russell et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 29.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Russell et al. supplementary material 4

Russell et al. supplementary material
Download Russell et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 82.2 KB