Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-01T16:52:42.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimizing geophysics, biotechnology and other emerging tools for livestock production and management: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2025

Gbolahan M. Folarin*
Affiliation:
Environmental Systems and Climate Change Programme, Centre of Excellence in Agricultural Development and Sustainable Environment, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria
Itunuola A. Folarin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Production and Renewable Resources, College of Agricultural Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria
Silifat A. Olanloye
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Production and Renewable Resources, College of Agricultural Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria
*
Corresponding author: Gbolahan M. Folarin; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In working towards meeting the rapidly rising demand for livestock products in the face of challenges such as climate change, limited forage land availability and inadequacies in water availability and quality, it is imperative to consider sustainability in farm or grazing land management and water resources conservation as well as biodiversity management and conservation, etc. Geophysics, GIS, remote sensing, etc., have been useful tools. Emerging technologies such as biotechnology, advanced sensor technologies, machine learning algorithms, internet of things, artificial intelligence, unmanned aerial vehicles, robotics, etc., are also being employed in agriculture and other aspects of human concerns. There are potentials for better utilization of these emerging technologies and more in livestock production and management. However, a limitation is that relevant knowledge and skills are still relatively inadequate, especially in developing countries; hence the need for this review, which is an enhancement of knowledge for research and improved productivity. Efforts should be made to advance in knowledge and skills acquisition so as to optimize this development for improved livestock production and management.

Type
Animal Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Livestock production/farming is the raising of terrestrial animals for various types of products, such as meat, milk, etc. (Garrigus and Holden, Reference Garrigus and Holden2020), while livestock management encompasses the overall planning, management, improvement and productivity for livestock resources (Senapati et al., Reference Senapati, Paikaray, Das and Swain2016). A contribution of over 20% of the agricultural gross national product has been reported for livestock farming in both developing and developed countries (Rana and Moniruzzaman, Reference Rana and Moniruzzaman2023). Demand for livestock products is rapidly increasing due to population increase and other factors (Poudel et al., Reference Poudel, Dahal, Upadhyaya, Chaudhari and Dhakal2020; Rana and Moniruzzaman, Reference Rana and Moniruzzaman2023). Meanwhile, to meeting this demand, there are the challenges of climate change, limited forage land availability and inadequacies in water availability and quality (Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022). Sustainability in farm management for soil health preservation and water conservation as well as biodiversity management and conservation are also important considerations (Gomiero, Reference Gomiero2016; Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022).

Fresh water is a very important resource (in availability and quality) in livestock production and management for drinking, cooling and cleaning, processing of livestock products and feed production (Hoekstra, Reference Hoekstra2009; Herrero et al., Reference Herrero, Wirsenius, Henderson, Rigolot, Thornton, Havlík, de Boer and Gerber2015). According to Steinfeld et al. (Reference Steinfeld, Gerber, Wassenaar, Castel, Rosales and De Haan2006), De Fraiture et al. (Reference De Fraiture, Wichelns, Benedict Kemp, Rockstrom and Molden2007), Hoekstra (Reference Hoekstra2009) and Herrero et al. (Reference Herrero, Wirsenius, Henderson, Rigolot, Thornton, Havlík, de Boer and Gerber2015), about 10% of the global annual rainfall, which is approximately 25–32% of the total global agricultural water use is attributable to livestock production and management. Heinke et al. (Reference Heinke, Lannerstad, Gerten, Havlík, Herrero, Notenbaert, Hoff and Müller2020) estimated that, about 41% of total annual agricultural water use goes into livestock feed production globally. It has been established that geophysics is very efficient in investigating and exploring for water.

Animal genetic resources (AnGRs) refer to the genetic materials of animals that are used for food and agriculture purposes. These include the diverse breeds and populations of domesticated animals that have been developed and maintained by humans over centuries for various agricultural activities such as milk production, meat, fibre, work and companionship (Rege and Gibson, Reference Rege and Gibson2003; Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour, Reference Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour2023). AnGRs are important for maintaining genetic diversity within livestock populations, which is essential for the resilience and sustainability of agriculture (Hoffmann, Reference Hoffmann2010). These resources can be preserved through breeding programmes, conservation efforts and the maintenance of gene banks.

The preservation of AnGRs of each ecological community is very crucial (Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour, Reference Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour2023) for ensuring food security, adapting to changing environmental conditions and developing new breeds with desired traits such as disease resistance, productivity and adaptability to different climates. However, effective exploitation of AnGRs for biodiversity conservation can only be ensured when there are proper identification, registration, organization and monitoring of these resources. Monitoring of AnGRs at local, regional and global levels requires the use of information and computer (ICT) tools to collect, store, manipulate, update, analyse and display geographical spatial information.

Emerging technologies such as internet of things (IoT), advanced sensor technologies, biotechnology, machine learning (ML) algorithms, artificial intelligence (AI), unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and robotics, are being increasingly employed in agriculture and other aspects of human concerns in recent times (Ilyas and Muneer, Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020; Nikitas et al., Reference Nikitas, Michalakopoulou, Njoya and Karampatzakis2020; Zahmatkesh and Al-Turjman, Reference Zahmatkesh and Al-Turjman2020). According to Ilyas and Muneer (Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020), as of 2020, four active satellite navigation systems provide global coverage: global positioning system (GPS) by the United States, Galileo by Europe, GLObal NAvigation Satellite System (GLONASS) by Russia and BeiDou by China.

Agriculture, and livestock production and management in particular, can use more of the applications of these emerging technologies for improved working conditions, cost efficiency and animal welfare, better production monitoring (such as remote monitoring, real-time data accessibility) and production data as well as increased profitability (Göncü and Güngör, Reference Göncü and Güngör2018). However, a limitation is that relevant knowledge and skills are still relatively inadequate, especially in developing countries; hence the need for this review, which is an enhancement of knowledge for research and improved productivity. Though resources are available in literature regarding these technologies, they are mainly concentrated on particular areas/technologies of interest, whereas this review is a comprehensive overview of the very relevant emerging and advancing technologies to the subject of livestock production and management. Efforts should be made to advance in knowledge and skills acquisition so as to optimize this development for improved livestock production and management.

Useful tools and emerging technologies in livestock production and management

Global positioning system

GPS is a satellite network-based positioning/navigation system which reveals positional information via the latitude, longitude and elevation of a location. Such information collected by GPS receivers facilitates high-accuracy field mapping for farmers and researchers on boundaries, water bodies and infested/problematic areas, as well as understanding of the relationship and interactions with other attributes within and outside the boundaries of given fields. Site-specific, precision application of water, nutrients and chemicals such as pesticides and herbicides are also made possible and efficient for increased productivity at reduced costs (Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022).

Having established a geofence by defining a closed polygon referring to a geographic area on earth, the real-time positioning of an animal can be tracked/monitored with the use of a satellite navigation device, which is commonly referred to as a GPS receiver. Alerts can be triggered by a location-aware device whenever the animal crosses the geofence (Ilyas and Muneer, Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020). Radio-frequency identification, wireless sensor networks and the low-power wide area network are other technologies that can be used for geofencing in livestock management (Ilyas and Muneer, Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020). UAVs are great enhancements for real-time livestock monitoring (Ilyas and Muneer, Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020).

Geophysics

Geophysics involves generation of data/information on features and conditions beneath the surface of the earth via surface measurement of relevant physical quantities. Near surface geophysics (typically within a depth range of 0–2 m) has been shown to have present and potential useful applications in agriculture; including site infrastructure assessment, environmental investigations and hydrologic monitoring, as well as detection of soil horizons, soil compaction, soil salinity, and mapping of hardpan layer, and soil texture in site-specific agriculture (Allred et al., Reference Allred, Daniels and Ehsani2008; Mohammed et al., Reference Mohammed, El Mahmoudi and Almolhem2022).

Furthermore, groundwater availability and quality assessment, quality/efficiency improvement soil surveys, delineation of spatial changes in soil properties, soil drainage class mapping, soil salinity assessment, determination of clay-pan depth, measurement of micro variability in soil profile horizon depths, estimation of herbicide partition coefficients in soil, identification of subsurface flow pathways, mapping of flood deposited sand depths on farmlands, soil water content determination, soil nutrient monitoring from manure applications, plant root biomass surveying, bedrock depth determination in glaciated landscape with thin soil cover and farm field and golf course drainage pipe detection are applications of geophysics in agriculture (Toushmalani, Reference Toushmalani2010); many of which affect livestock production and management directly or indirectly. Geophysical methods which are being widely used in agriculture include the electrical resistivity tomography, electromagnetic and ground penetrating radar methods; giving rise mostly to depth sections and contour maps.

Peralta et al. (Reference Peralta, Cicore, Marino, Da Silva and Costa2015), using geophysical and other measurements, showed that apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), which favours site-specific management in soils for livestock production, can also serve as a potential pasture yield estimator. They reported high spatial heterogeneity of some of the related soil properties in soils used for livestock production.

Underground water sources can be located for livestock drinking water via geophysical surveys. Geophysical surveys can also be utilized for identifying suitable areas for farm buildings/structures, ponds, pastures, roads, fences, etc., in farm planning/design. Geophysical methods and soil geochemistry can facilitate assessment of nutrient availability/deficiencies, thereby guiding fertilizer application and nutrient supplementation, enhancing proper animal nutrition.

Geographic information systems

Geographic information system (GIS) comprises of tools for the collection, storage and retrieval of data at will, as well as analysing, transforming and manipulating spatial and non-spatial data, and presenting them through intuitive and illustrative maps for specific purposes (Burrough, Reference Burrough1986; Burrough and McDonnell, Reference Burrough and McDonnell1998; Gomiero, Reference Gomiero2013; Soomro, Reference Soomro2015; Delgado et al., Reference Delgado, Vandenberg, Neer and D'Adamo2019). GIS, used along with other technologies such as remote sensing (RS), GPS, AI, computational systems, data analytics and digital technologies has become very crucial in precision farming and sustainable food production; in monitoring crops and implementing efficient and effective management practices towards improving crop and livestock productivity (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, Karaliya and Chaudhary2017; Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022). GIS and RS have been reported to be efficient for prevention of universal ecological hazards (Dukiya, Reference Dukiya2021; Bimrew, Reference Bimrew2022).

GIS can be used to create a complete livestock geo-database, which can be very useful in providing easy accessibility to information about availability/abundance of different animal species in any location (Senapati et al., Reference Senapati, Paikaray, Das and Swain2016). Geodatabase can also be created for exotic, local and/or cross breeding farms as well as semen stations, frozen semen laboratories, good animal rearing sites, etc. (Senapati et al., Reference Senapati, Paikaray, Das and Swain2016). Also, monitoring and integration of the progress and coverage/extent of implementation of livestock insurance and other programmes can be achieved with the aid of GIS (Senapati et al., Reference Senapati, Paikaray, Das and Swain2016).

GISs and RS tools can be highly valuable in the conservation of AnGRs through habitat mapping, biodiversity assessment as well as monitoring and surveillance of land use that may impact animal habitats (McManus et al., Reference McManus, Hermuche, Paiva, Ferrugem-Moraes, Barros de Melo and Mendes2014, Reference McManus, Hermuche, Paiva, Guimarães, Osmar, Junior and Blackburn2021; Duruz et al., Reference Duruz, Flury, Matasci, Joerin, Widmer and Joost2017). Cringoli et al. (Reference Cringoli, Rinaldi, Musella, Veneziano, Maurelli, Di Pietro, Frisiello and Di Pietro2007) had used GIS to study the spatial structure of livestock (cattle, water buffaloes and sheep) populations to unravel the role of sheep as reservoir for the transmission of cystic echinococcosis to cattle and water buffaloes.

Furthermore, it can help in identifying threats to genetic resources and implementing timely conservation measures (Duruz et al., Reference Duruz, Flury, Matasci, Joerin, Widmer and Joost2017). This information is critical for developing strategies to mitigate these impacts and ensure the long-term survival of vulnerable populations. An example of this is a Web-GIS-based platform called GENMON which is designed to assess the degree of endangerment to farm animal species (Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour, Reference Jelokhani-Niaraki and Omidipour2023).

By leveraging GIS and RS technologies, conservationists can enhance their understanding of AnGRs, optimize conservation strategies and contribute to the sustainable management of biodiversity for future generations.

Remote sensing

RS is a technical process of acquiring information about distant objects via technological means without physical contact. It is very useful for data/information (spectral, temporal and spatial) acquisition, exploration, surveillance, management and inventory in crop and animal production, and other fields, as well as in environmental monitoring and biodiversity conservation (Mancino et al., Reference Mancino, Nolè, Ripullone and Ferrara2014; Senapati et al., Reference Senapati, Paikaray, Das and Swain2016; Guerini et al., Reference Guerini, Kuplich and Quadros2019; Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Jacob and Duveiller2020). Simultaneous acquisition of data from large areas is made possible with RS (Guerini et al., Reference Guerini, Kuplich and Quadros2019). RS when combined with GPS, GIS and other relevant tools is efficient for soil mapping, crop growth monitoring, estimation of soil moisture and fertility, detection of biotic (pests and diseases) and abiotic (drought and flood) stresses and yield estimation (Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022).

Biomass and pasture evaluation, which can be useful in predicting the beginning or peak of vegetation growth as well as monitor vegetation dynamics via vegetation indices (VIs) such as soil adjusted vegetation index and normalized difference vegetation index, can be determined with the use of RS (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Gou, Tsunekawa, Cheng and Hou2022; Rhodes et al., Reference Rhodes, Perotto-Baldivieso, Reeves and Gonzalez2022). This can also impact large-scale forage production and assessment (da Silva et al., Reference da Silva, Salami, da Silva, Silva, Monteiro and Alba2020; Wijesingha et al., Reference Wijesingha, Astor, Schulze-Brüninghoff, Wengert and Wachendorf2020; Rhodes et al., Reference Rhodes, Perotto-Baldivieso, Reeves and Gonzalez2022).

RS and GIS have been applied to human and animal health in identifying localized species–habitat correlations and employing high spatial resolution satellite data to upscale to regional control programmes (Hay et al., Reference Hay, Packer and Rogers1997; Curran et al., Reference Curran, Atkinson, Foody and Milton2000; Griffiths et al., Reference Griffiths, Lee and Eversham2000). Factors such as habitat fragmentation, patch proximity, species' richness and/or climatic factors influence disease vector distribution and can be represented using remotely sensed imagery (Boone et al., Reference Boone, McGwire, Otteson, DeBaca, Kuhn, Villard, Brussard and St. Jeor2000; Hay, Reference Hay2000; Thomson and Conner, Reference Thomson and Conner2000). This has enhanced risk-based control strategies. McKenzle et al. (Reference McKenzle, Morris, Pfelffer and Dymond2002) developed a statistical model using logistic regression for identification of geographic and habitat factors associated with the risk of the presence of a possum TB hot spot on a farm.

Multi-criteria decision analysis

Since much earlier, decision support systems have been useful in making complex animal health management decisions at both farm and larger coverages through provision of useful information, promotion of deliberation and analyses of the available options (Morris et al., Reference Morris, Sanson, McKenzie and Marsh1993; Sprague, Reference Sprague, Sprague and Watson1993).

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach is an advanced model consisting of fast running, error-free analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP; statistical approach (frequency ratio model), etc. (Rana and Moniruzzaman, Reference Rana and Moniruzzaman2023). GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach and other features of GIS such as soil type distribution, soil texture mapping, buried deep underground water level distribution, soil fertility distribution, soil pollution distribution, hydraulic conductivity of soil (Ks), slope (S), soil texture (ST), depth to water-table (DTW), electrical conductivity of groundwater (ECw), climate conditions, topography and satellite data are now being used by researchers for sustainable land use planning; studying to identify and utilize the various interactions, dependences and impacts of the interacting factors (Ghosh and Kumpatla, Reference Ghosh and Kumpatla2022).

AHP at present is being widely used together with the combination of GIS and RS approaches for locating appropriate sites for various purposes, such as cropland (Akram et al., Reference Akram, Mondal and Bandyopadhyay2018; Uddin et al., Reference Uddin, Mohiuddin, Ahmed, Rahman, Karim and Saha2020; Hossen et al., Reference Hossen, Yabar and Mizunoya2021; Mostafiz et al., Reference Mostafiz, Noguchi and Ahamed2021); route alignment planning (Singh and Singh, Reference Singh and Singh2017) and determination of groundwater potential zones (Alikhanov et al., Reference Alikhanov, Juliev, Alikhanova and Mondal2021; Singh et al., Reference Singh, Hasnat, Rao and Singh2021; Rana et al., Reference Rana, Hossain, Huq, Islam, Das, Ghosh, Mukhopadhyay, Das Gupta and Kumar Singh2022). RS and GIS are also used for climatic assessment of forest (Mondal et al., Reference Mondal, Thakur and De2022) and urban areas (Gazi and Mondal, Reference Gazi and Mondal2018), forest coverage tracking (Mondal et al., Reference Mondal, Thakur, Ghosh, De and Bandyopadhyay2018; Thakur et al., Reference Thakur, Maity, Mondal, Basumatary, Ghosh, Das and De2020) and soil erosion measurements (Bag et al., Reference Bag, Mondal, Dehbozorgi, Das, Bandyopadhyay, Pham, Al-Quraishi and Cuong2022) among other uses.

Several researchers in different parts of the world have studied the use of combinations of MCDA/AHP, RS and geospatial techniques to locate suitable sites for livestock production/farming; e.g. in Ghara-Aghch region, central Iran (Amiri et al., Reference Amiri, Shariff, Tabatabaie and Alam2012), Fujian in China (Peng et al., Reference Peng, Chen, Li, Bai and Pan2014), Dire district, Southern Ethiopia (Terfa and Suryabhagavan, Reference Terfa and Suryabhagavan2015), Hangzhou metropolitan area, China (Qiu et al., Reference Qiu, Zhu, Pan, Hu and Amable2017), Ghayen Plain in Iran (Rajabi et al., Reference Rajabi, Ajorlo and Dehghani2020), Bale lowlands of Ethiopia (Balew et al., Reference Balew, Legese, Kunbushu, Nega, Alebel, Kerbesh, Md Mijanur and Rubenstein2022), Faridpur district of Bangladesh (Rana et al., Reference Rana, Moniruzzaman and Howlader2023), etc.

Rana and Moniruzzaman (Reference Rana and Moniruzzaman2023) used GIS-based MCDA and RS techniques to locate ideal land for livestock (sheep, goats, buffalo and cow) production in the Northwestern part of Bangladesh. They used geospatial tools to combine eight thematic/geographical layers (slope, land use and land cover, soil types, rainfall, water accessibility, road distance, relative humidity and average temperature) in the suitability analysis for livestock production; measuring the weight of each criterion with AHP, which is an MCDA approach. They produced a map that depicted low, medium, high and excellent sites for raising cattle.

Balew et al. (Reference Balew, Legese, Kunbushu, Nega, Alebel, Kerbesh, Md Mijanur and Rubenstein2022) reported that climate change and human factors, as well as lack of sufficient environmental and rangeland policies, disaster mitigation strategies and good management had negatively affected rangeland resources of the Bale lowlands, Ethiopia. In their study, they employed GIS-based MCDA and RS techniques to identify suitable rangeland for cattle, sheep, goat and camel production in the Bale lowlands; using land-use and land-cover, rainfall, water accessibility, slope and soil types for the suitability analysis.

Bioinformatics

Biostatistics is the application of statistical techniques in collecting, presenting, analysing and interpreting biological data, particularly in the field of biology (life sciences), medicine and public health. Biostatistics has found important applications in livestock production and management. In veterinary medicine and animal science, it facilitates and enhances tracking and interferencing of populations, through statistical analysis of evidence-based data of various animal diseases and disorders; gives rise to accurate sample testing and disease diagnosis, thereby enhancing health monitoring and treatment; facilitates availability of essential animal health information through statistical data; removes bias as well as improves analysis, resulting in better, dependable inferences, conclusions and decision making; and enhances better animal health care (Nisanka, Reference Nisanka2022).

Modern data analytics and ML tools make exploration of environmental sensor data, clustering using farm traits and categories, and identification of causality and variable importance achievable (Neethirajan, Reference Neethirajan2020; Pitesky et al., Reference Pitesky, Gendreau, Bond and Carrasco-Medanic2020; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Li, Xue, Jia, Gao, Li and Huo2021; Quintana-Ospina et al., Reference Quintana-Ospina, Alfaro-Wisaquillo, Oviedo-Rondon, Ruiz-Ramirez, Bernal-Arango and Martinez-Bernal2023a). When dealing with large data sets, data mining tools (e.g. commercial Oracle Data Miner, IBM SPSS Modeler, SAS Enterprise Miner and Microsoft SQL Server Analysis service, as well as Open-source R and Orange, etc.) are required to reveal patterns, relationships and insights. Data mining techniques include regression, decision trees, clustering, classification, association rule mining and neural networks (Aggarwal, Reference Aggarwal2015; Bramer, Reference Bramer and Mackie2016; Quintana-Ospina et al., Reference Quintana-Ospina, Alfaro-Wisaquillo, Oviedo-Rondon, Ruiz-Ramirez, Bernal-Arango and Martinez-Bernal2023b).

Quintana-Ospina et al. (Reference Quintana-Ospina, Alfaro-Wisaquillo, Oviedo-Rondon, Ruiz-Ramirez, Bernal-Arango and Martinez-Bernal2023a) evaluated the effects of temperature, relative humidity, thermal humidity index, management and farm-associated factors on body weight (BW), BW gain, feed conversion ratio and mortality of broilers raised to 35 days under commercial tropical conditions; employing correlation analyses, one-way ANOVA and ML. Ozturk et al. (Reference Ozturk, Kecici, Serva, Ekiz and Magrin2023) determined the best non-linear growth function, among a selected four; Gompertz, Logistic, Von Bertalanffy and Brody, for Kivircik lambs as well as the growth parameters for different sexes, birth types and birth seasons.

Biotechnology

Utilization of biotechnology is immensely improving animal nutrition, genetics, health, etc. (Van Eenennaam, Reference Van Eenennaam2016; NTNU, Reference NTNU2022). Gene editing has employed advanced technologies, such was clustered regulatory interspersed short palindromic repeats/associated protein 9 (CRISPRs/Cas9) for detection and elimination of possible genetic disorders in animals and biological systems. Biotechnology has also been applied in gene therapy, where DNA is used as a therapeutic disease treatment agent (Agina, Reference Agina2022); involving the repair of mutated cells as has been expressed in the treatment of cancer and cystic fibrosis. Other emerging and advancing applications are molecular diagnostics (PCR, RT-PCR, nanoPCR, biosensors, proteomics, nanotechnology), production of virus vectored vaccines and DNA vaccine technology, among others.

Internet of things

IoT refers to a network of uniquely identifiable interconnected devices embedded with sensors, software and other technologies, that communicate with themselves and other such networks over the internet. IoT also involves collection and cloud-storing of data by connected devices, which are processed for common goals using intelligent algorithms. IoT has found very laudable applications in livestock production and management; including animal location, tracing and tracking, as well as farm monitoring, healthy food production, improved security management, etc. (Ashraf et al., Reference Ashraf, Syed, Muhammad and Mujahid2017; Ilyas and Muneer, Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020; Kays and Wikelski, Reference Kays and Wikelski2023; Mishra and Sharma, Reference Mishra and Sharma2023). Meanwhile, there is still potential for much more.

The applications of AI and ML have enhanced knowledge and understanding of animal behaviour and discomfort, disease prevention and management, and the efficiency of decisions that impart farmers' economy (Mishra and Sharma, Reference Mishra and Sharma2023). Techniques based on ML are being explored for predicting disease–biomolecule associations with multi-view data sources (Yulian et al., Reference Yulian, Xiujuan, Bo and Fang-Xiang2021). Quantitative geneticists and animal breeders are also progressively exploring deep learning (DL) in genomic predictions (Junjie et al., Reference Junjie, Cedric, Kenneth and Juan2021). Digital twin technology is an AI-based advancement in cattle production for better efficiency and cost effectiveness (Mishra and Sharma, Reference Mishra and Sharma2023). Internet of Animals is also a very promising emerging application of IoT (Kays and Wikelski, Reference Kays and Wikelski2023).

Ilyas and Muneer (Reference Ilyas and Muneer2020) proposed a smart livestock tracking and geofencing solution by creating a geographical safe zone for cattle using IoT and (General Packet Radio Service) GPRS, where the cattle are assigned dedicated IoT sensors, enabling them to be remotely monitored and managed. This smart system collects the location, well-being and health data of the livestock.

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)

UAVs are small aircraft, which are also known as mini flying robots, miniature pilotless aircraft or drones designed to fly without human pilot. They operate via mutual collaboration of aircraft bodies, ground control station and sensor support. UAVs are efficient, easy to use and maintain, able to reach remote locations within minimum time and effort, capable of vertical take-off and landing as well as long-term flight and surveillance; and without risk of loss or damage to human life. They have made the collection of outdoor aerial images possible, or easier as the case may be, and have enhanced monitoring and analysis (Bentley, Reference Bentley2018; Scharf, Reference Scharf2019; Gül et al., Reference Gül, Güzey, Yıldırım and Keskin2021; Hossain, Reference Hossain2022; Kaşlı, Reference Kaşlı2022; Turğut and Şeker, Reference Turğut and Şeker2022).

The UAV technology facilitates several, diverse modern livestock production and management operations, such as health and behaviour monitoring; zoonotic disease monitoring; detection, counting and tracking of farm animals; early diagnosis of diseases; grazing land search and monitoring; habitat improvement; search and rescue; AI, ML and DL applications; welfare risk management; real-time tracking; conservation management; smart farming with IoT; surveillance and reporting of potential threats as well as improved treatment and farm management (Koh and Wich, Reference Koh and Wich2012; Hodgson and Koh, Reference Hodgson and Koh2016; Hodgson et al., Reference Hodgson, Mott, Baylis, Pham, Wotherspoon, Kilpatrick and Koh2018; Al-Thani et al., Reference Al-Thani, Albuainain, Alnaimi and Zorba2020; Alanezi et al., Reference Alanezi, Shahriar, Hasan, Ahmed, Sha'aban and Bouchekara2022; Ergün and Ergün, Reference Ergün and Ergün2024). Meanwhile, Ergün and Ergün (Reference Ergün and Ergün2024) opined that the application areas can still be expanded to get the best of the technology. Also, to fully unlock the full potentials of UAVs in wildlife research, regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines need to be appropriately set to allow their usage (Christie et al., Reference Christie, Gilbert, Brown, Hatfield and Hanson2016; Hodgson and Koh, Reference Hodgson and Koh2016; Duporge et al., Reference Duporge, Spiegel, Thomson, Chapman, Lamberth, Pond, Macdonald, Wang and Klinck2021).

Sensor technologies, artificial intelligence and UAVs

Sensor technologies, which have been reported to save time and energy are useful in livestock precision farming practices pertaining to individual animal behaviour, grazing conditions (livestock grazing behaviour and rangeland resources), health conditions and forage intakes (Bimrew, Reference Bimrew2022). Biosensors or simply sensors have been reported to be useful in easy, affordable and quick field assessment of animal health and welfare as well as diagnosis of animal disease-causing organisms (Vidic et al., Reference Vidic, Manzano, Chang and Jaffrezic-Renault2017; Dukiya, Reference Dukiya2021; Tewari et al., Reference Tewari, Jain, Brar, Prasad and Prasad2021). In livestock production and management, it is essential to assess and monitor rangeland resources for better management and utilization. Rangeland serves as grazing land for domestic animals and wildlife. Due to varying environmental conditions and management practices, forages and pasture vary in abundance, species and chemical composition (Bimrew, Reference Bimrew2022). Meanwhile, measurement accuracy, repetitive data, inadequacy of knowledge and skill in developing countries, limited applicability in tropical climate, among other factors have been reported as limitations to the use of sensors (biosensors) (Bimrew, Reference Bimrew2022). Sensors have been used to study the predictability of lifetime resilience and productive life span of dairy cows (Mücher et al., Reference Mücher, Los, Franke and Kamphuis2022).

According to Mücher et al. (Reference Mücher, Los, Franke and Kamphuis2022), animal detection using AI-based remotely sensed imagery has very strong potential for enhancing effective and efficient monitoring of cattle herds in extensive and remote beef production systems. They also reported UAVs to be useful and promising in assessing traits which are connected to resilience in cattle, such as individual cattle and postures detection. Furthermore, UAV-borne RS has been used for grassland biomass estimation in grassland monitoring and mapping with multispectral imaging (Hakala et al., Reference Hakala, Viljanen, Honkavaara, Näsi, Niemeläinen and Kaivosoja2018).

Li and Jia (Reference Li, Jia, El-Askary, Erguler, Karakus and Chaminé2022) worked on producing an estimation model for pasture health using multispectral imagery, which can perform livestock management automatically when rooted into electronic shepherding system. They investigated VIs using the Sentinel-2 MSI imagery, thereby proposing a class-based regression model for the growing, matured and grazed grassland, obtained from support vector machine classification, which led to an improved correlation between the canopy chlorophyll content index and the above-ground biomass. They used in situ data samples for the research, while ground truthing was done with the use of UAV. They developed an improved regression model which supports better grazing intensity estimation and guidance of livestock rotation cycles.

Mücher et al. (Reference Mücher, Los, Franke and Kamphuis2022) investigated the detection, counting, identification and characterization of posture of individual cows in grassland production systems via remotely sensed imagery data sets from satellites, manned aircrafts and UAVs, as well as DL techniques.

Precision livestock management

Precision livestock management (PLM) is an integration of sensor technologies, including on-animal sensors such as real-time tracking and motion sensors, automated feeders, body weighing scales and milk extractors, environmental monitoring equipment (such as weather stations) and RS applications; with digital documentation, systematic ranching operations recording for financial analysis, inventory management and production assessments incorporated for well- informed decisions (Wathes et al., Reference Wathes, Kristensen, Aerts and Berckmans2008; Berckmans, Reference Berckmans2014; Bailey et al., Reference Bailey, Trotter, Tobin and Thomas2021; Nyamuryekung'e, Reference Nyamuryekung'e2024). With machine vision, non-invasive animal monitoring is achievable with fixed sensors.

PLM within IoT has tremendous capacity for enhanced traceability and real-time livestock production/management information which can greatly increase the efficiency of ranchers in managing their very complex production systems, and even positively impact the entire food chain (Nyamuryekung'e, Reference Nyamuryekung'e2024). PLM has evolved tremendously in recent times with the use of bio-sensors, data analytics, automation power, AI, ML, robotics, etc.

Precision livestock farming technologies based on advances in sensor-based high-throughput phenotyping and AI have greatly enhanced the accuracy of genomic predictions, discovery of novel traits and understanding of genotype by environment interactions, as well as selection of animals with superior and better environmentally adapted qualities (Pérez-Enciso and Zingaretti, Reference Pérez-Enciso and Zingaretti2019; Fuentes et al., Reference Fuentes, Gonzalez, Tongson and Dunshea2022). Precision breeding techniques, such as marker-assisted selection and genomic selection enable precise breeding decisions, thereby enhancing the accuracy of prediction of animal genetic potentials.

Recommendations

In the light of the above, efforts should be made, especially for animal scientists, environmentalists, researchers, academics, farmers and industries personnel in developing countries, for further advancement in knowledge and skills acquisition so as to optimize this development for improved livestock production and management. While these technologies are emerging and advancing in the face of increasing population, climate variability/change effects and demands for livestock products for food and raw materials, it is imperative to rise to the occasion of meeting the demands by being effectively positioned and equipped to optimize them.

It is also essential to enhance increasing involvement, dexterity and relevance in, as well as get a good grip of current global concerns such as food security, biodiversity conservation, technology in agriculture and agrifood research. Governments in conjunction with local industries, private and international organizations, and non-governmental organizations should rise to the occasion by providing, facilitating or securing grants for equipment and research as well as sponsoring relevant personnel in academic and research institutions to conduct both local and international research in this regard. Field practicals, farmers' orientation and extension programmes as well as empowerment should also be encouraged and enhanced.

Faculty members in academic and research institutions, especially in developing countries, should be encouraged to embrace developments and upgrade themselves in ICT and digital applications. Furthermore, multi-disciplinary researches and approaches in relation to livestock production and management should be better embraced, encouraged, facilitated, promoted and enhanced. It is also recommended that partnership, internships and visitations should be encouraged and enhanced between institutions and industries (home and abroad) involved in livestock agriculture – education, research, production and management. This will facilitate increasing and improving knowledge sharing, innovation, productivity and development. Finally, it is very important for policy makers to look into the relevant, necessary regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines pertaining to the application of these emerging tools, such as UAVs.

Conclusion

Besides the already relatively common tools, livestock production and management can use the application of emerging technologies such as advanced sensor technologies, biotechnology, IoT, AI, UAVs, ML algorithms and robotics in a bid to meet the increasing demands for livestock products. However, limitations of relatively inadequate relevant knowledge and skills as well as poor embrace of multi-disciplinary researches and approaches, especially in developing countries, are still to be overcome. This review is an enhancement of knowledge, with a potential for marked improvement in research and productivity. It is to raise awareness and also a call to further research regarding the highlighted areas and more.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge all those who had contributed to the resources that form the basis for this review.

Author contributions

G. M. F. conceived, wrote, edited, collated and formatted this manuscript. I. A. F. and S. A. O. also wrote parts of the manuscript. All the authors contributed to and approve the final manuscript.

Funding statement

This review did not receive any external funding.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, financial or otherwise.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Aggarwal, C (2015) Data classification. In Data Mining: The Textbook. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 285343.Google Scholar
Agina, OA (2022) Application of advanced biotechnology tools in veterinary medicine. Animal Research International 19, 46044616.Google Scholar
Akram, WSK, Mondal, I and Bandyopadhyay, J (2018) Crop suitability analysis in water resource management of Paschim Midnapore District: a remote sensing approach. Sustainable Water Resources Management 5, 797815, Springer, 10.1007/s40899-018-0262-4. ISSN 2363-5037.Google Scholar
Al-Thani, N, Albuainain, A, Alnaimi, F and Zorba, N (2020) Drones for sheep livestock monitoring. In Proc. IEEE 20th Medit. Electrotech. Conf. (MELECON), Jun. 2020, pp. 672676. doi: 10.1109/MELECON48756.2020.9140588Google Scholar
Alanezi, MA, Shahriar, MS, Hasan, B, Ahmed, S, Sha'aban, YA and Bouchekara, HREH (2022) Livestock management with unmanned aerial vehicles: a review. IEEE Access 10, 4500145028.Google Scholar
Alikhanov, B, Juliev, M, Alikhanova, S and Mondal, I (2021) Assessment of influencing factor method for delineation of groundwater potential zones with geospatial techniques. Case study of Bostanlik district. Uzbekistan Groundwater Sustainability 12, 100548.Google Scholar
Allred, BJ, Daniels, JJ and Ehsani, MR (2008) Handbook of Agricultural Geophysics. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, ISBN 9781420019353.Google Scholar
Amiri, F, Shariff, ARBM and Tabatabaie, T (2012) Monitoring land suitability for mixed livestock grazing using geographic information system (GIS). In Alam, BM (ed.), From the Edited Volume: Application of Geographic Information Systems. London: IntechOpen, pp. 241264. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/40531Google Scholar
Ashraf, MWA, Syed, FH, Muhammad, A and Mujahid, R (2017) Importance of Internet of Things (IoT) in livestock industry in Pakistan's perspective. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering 8, 1215.Google Scholar
Bag, R, Mondal, I, Dehbozorgi, MB, Das, SP, Bandyopadhyay, DN, Pham, J, Al-Quraishi, AMF and Cuong, NX (2022) Modeling and mapping of susceptibility to soil erosion using machine learnings in a tropical sub-humid environment. Journal of Cleaner Production 364, 132428, Elsevier ISSN 0959-6526.Google Scholar
Bailey, DW, Trotter, MG, Tobin, C and Thomas, MG (2021) Opportunities to apply precision livestock management on rangelands. Frontier in Sustainable Food Systems 5, 611915.Google Scholar
Balew, A, Legese, B, Kunbushu, D, Nega, W, Alebel, W, Kerbesh, A, Md Mijanur, R and Rubenstein, DI (2022) Identification of suitable land for livestock production using GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis and remote sensing in the Bale Lowlands, Ethiopia. International Journal of Ecology 2022, 585552. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9585552Google Scholar
Bentley, JM (2018) Policing the police: balancing the right to privacy against the beneficial use of drone technology. Hastings Law Journal 70, 249.Google Scholar
Berckmans, D (2014) Precision livestock farming technologies for welfare management in intensive livestock systems. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique 33, 189196.Google Scholar
Bimrew, A (2022) A review of sensor technologies applicable for domestic livestock production and health management. Advances in Agriculture 2022, Article ID 1599190.Google Scholar
Boone, JD, McGwire, KC, Otteson, EW, DeBaca, RS, Kuhn, EA, Villard, P, Brussard, PF and St. Jeor, SC (2000) Remote sensing and geographic information systems: charting Sin Nombre virus infections in deer mice. Emerging Infectious Diseases 6, 248258.Google Scholar
Bramer, M (2016) Using decision trees for classification. In Mackie, I (ed.), Principles of Data Mining, Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science. London, UK: Springer, pp. 3948.Google Scholar
Burrough, PA (1986) Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resource Assessment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burrough, PA and McDonnell, RA (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christie, KS, Gilbert, SL, Brown, CL, Hatfield, M and Hanson, L (2016) Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14, 241251.Google Scholar
Cringoli, G, Rinaldi, L, Musella, V, Veneziano, V, Maurelli, MP, Di Pietro, F, Frisiello, M and Di Pietro, S (2007) Geo-referencing livestock farms as tool for studying cystic echinococcosis epidemiology in cattle and water buffaloes from southern Italy. Geospatial Health 2, 105111, PMID: 18686260.Google Scholar
Curran, PJ, Atkinson, PM, Foody, GM and Milton, EJ (2000) Linking remote sensing, land cover and disease. Advances in Parasitology 47, 3780.Google Scholar
da Silva, VS, Salami, G, da Silva, MIO, Silva, EA, Monteiro, JJJ and Alba, E (2020) Methodological evaluation of vegetation indexes in land use and land cover (LULC) classification. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 4, 159169.Google Scholar
De Fraiture, C, Wichelns, D, Benedict Kemp, E and Rockstrom, J (2007) Scenarios on water for food and environment. In Molden, D (ed.), Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, pp. 91145.Google Scholar
Delgado, JA, Vandenberg, B, Neer, D and D'Adamo, R (2019) Emerging nutrient management databases and networks of networks will have broad applicability in future machine learning and artificial intelligence applications in soil and water conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 74, 113A118A.Google Scholar
Dukiya, JJ (2021) The role of remote sensing in epidemiological studies and the global pandemic surveillance. Journal of Atmospheric & Earth Science 5, 17.Google Scholar
Duporge, I, Spiegel, MP, Thomson, ER, Chapman, T, Lamberth, C, Pond, C, Macdonald, DW, Wang, T and Klinck, H (2021) Determination of optimal flight altitude to minimize acoustic drone disturbance to wildlife using species audiograms Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12, 21962207.Google Scholar
Duruz, S, Flury, C, Matasci, G, Joerin, F, Widmer, I and Joost, SA (2017) WebGIS platform for the monitoring of farm animal genetic resources (GENMON). PLoS ONE 12, e0176362.Google Scholar
Ergün, SS and Ergün, E (2024) Use of drone technology in animal health and management. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 21, 24542460.Google Scholar
Fuentes, S, Gonzalez, CV, Tongson, E and Dunshea, FR (2022) the livestock farming digital transformation: implementation of new and emerging technologies using artificial intelligence Animal Health Research Reviews 23, 5971.Google Scholar
Garrigus, WP and Holden, PJ (2020) Livestock farming. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/livestock-farmingGoogle Scholar
Gazi, A and Mondal, I (2018) Urban heat island and its effect on dweller of Kolkata metropolitan area using geospatial techniques. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering 6, 778794, ISSN-2347-2693.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P and Kumpatla, SP (2022) GIS Applications in Agriculture. London: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.104786Google Scholar
Gomiero, T (2013) Alternative land management strategies and their impact on soil conservation. Agriculture 3, 464483.Google Scholar
Gomiero, T (2016) Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability 8, 281.Google Scholar
Göncü, S and Güngör, C (2018) The innovative techniques in animal husbandry. IntechOpen, 325. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.72501Google Scholar
Griffiths, GH, Lee, J and Eversham, BC (2000) Landscape pattern and species richness; regional scale analysis from remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21, 26852704.Google Scholar
Guerini, FM, Kuplich, TM and Quadros, FLFD (2019) Estimating natural grassland biomass by vegetation indices using sentinel 2 remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 41, 28612876.Google Scholar
Gül, S, Güzey, YZ, Yıldırım, H and Keskin, M (2021) Eye of the farmer in the sky: drones. Turkey Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Journal 3, 6977.Google Scholar
Hakala, T, Viljanen, N, Honkavaara, E, Näsi, R, Niemeläinen, O and Kaivosoja, JA (2018) Novel machine learning method for estimating biomass of grass swards using a photogrammetric canopy height model, images and vegetation indices captured by a drone. Agriculture 8, 70.Google Scholar
Hay, SI (2000) An overview of remote sensing and geodesy for epidemiology and public health application. Advances in Parasitology 47, l35.Google Scholar
Hay, SI, Packer, MJ and Rogers, DJ (1997) The impact of remote sensing on the study and control of invertebrate intermediate hosts and vectors for disease. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18, 28992930.Google Scholar
Heinke, J, Lannerstad, M, Gerten, D, Havlík, P, Herrero, M, Notenbaert, AMO, Hoff, H and Müller, C (2020) Water use in global livestock production – opportunities and constraints for increasing water productivity. Water Resources Research 56, e2019WR026995.Google Scholar
Herrero, M, Wirsenius, S, Henderson, B, Rigolot, C, Thornton, P, Havlík, P, de Boer, I and Gerber, PJ (2015) Livestock and the environment: what have we learned in the past decade? Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40, 177202.Google Scholar
Hodgson, JC and Koh, LP (2016) Best practice for minimizing unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research. Current Biology 26, R404R405.Google Scholar
Hodgson, JC, Mott, R, Baylis, SM, Pham, TT, Wotherspoon, S, Kilpatrick, AD and Koh, LP (2018) Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 11601167.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, AY (2009) Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis. Ecological Economics 68, 19631974.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, I (2010) Climate change and the characterization, breeding and conservation of animal genetic resources. Animal Genetics 1, 3246.Google Scholar
Hossain, R (2022) A short review of the drone technology. International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Technology 7, 5368.Google Scholar
Hossen, B, Yabar, H and Mizunoya, T (2021) Land suitability assessment for pulse (green gram) production through remote sensing, GIS and multicriteria analysis in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Sustainability 13, 12360.Google Scholar
Hu, Y, Gou, X, Tsunekawa, A, Cheng, Y and Hou, F (2022) Assessment of the vegetation sensitivity index in alpine meadows with a high coverage and toxic weed invasion under grazing disturbance. Frontiers in Plant Science 13, 1068941.Google Scholar
Ilyas, QM and Muneer, A (2020) Smart farming: an enhanced pursuit of sustainable remote livestock tracking and geofencing using IoT and GPRS. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2020, Article ID 6660733.Google Scholar
Jelokhani-Niaraki, S and Omidipour, M (2023) Development and implementation of a web-based GIS for registering and monitoring the livestock and poultry genetic resources. Biological and Applied Sciences 66, e23220759.Google Scholar
Junjie, H, Cedric, G, Kenneth, R and Juan, PS (2021) Heuristic hyperparameter optimization of deep learning models for genomic prediction G3 Genes Genomes Genetics 11, jkab032.Google Scholar
Kaşlı, E (2022) Use of drone in law enforcement. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 14, 329340.Google Scholar
Kays, R and Wikelski, M (2023) The internet of animals: what it is, what it could be. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38, 859869. ISSN 0169-5347.Google Scholar
Koh, LP and Wich, SA (2012) Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Tropical Conservation Science 5, 121132.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Karaliya, SK and Chaudhary, S (2017) Precision farming technologies towards enhancing productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat cropping system. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6, 142151.Google Scholar
Li, M and Jia, X (2022) Grassland classification for livestock management using multispectral remote sensing imagery. In El-Askary, H, Erguler, ZA, Karakus, M and Chaminé, HI (eds), Research Developments in Geotechnics, Geo-Informatics and Remote Sensing. CAJG 2019. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation. Cham: Springer, pp. 391394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72896-0_89Google Scholar
Mancino, G, Nolè, A, Ripullone, F and Ferrara, A (2014) Landsat TM imagery and NDVI differencing to detect vegetation change: assessing natural forest expansion in Basilicata, southern Italy. iForest 7, 7584.Google Scholar
McKenzle, JS, Morris, RS, Pfelffer, DU and Dymond, JR (2002) Application of remote sensing to enhance the control of wildlife-associated Mycobacterium bovis infection. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68, 153159.Google Scholar
McManus, C, Hermuche, P, Paiva, SR, Ferrugem-Moraes, JC, Barros de Melo, C and Mendes, C (2014) Geographical distribution of sheep breeds in Brazil and their relationship with climatic and environmental factors as risk classification for conservation. Brazilian Journal of Science and Technology 1, 3.Google Scholar
McManus, C, Hermuche, PM, Paiva, SR, Guimarães, RF, Osmar, A, Junior, C and Blackburn, DH (2021) Gene bank collection strategies based upon geographic and environmental indicators for beef breeds in the United States of America. Livestock Science 254, 104766.Google Scholar
Mishra, S and Sharma, SK (2023) Advanced contribution of IoT in agricultural production for the development of smart livestock environments. Internet of Things 22, 100724. ISSN 2542-6605.Google Scholar
Mohammed, M, El Mahmoudi, A and Almolhem, Y (2022) Applications of electromagnetic induction and electrical resistivity tomography for digital monitoring and assessment of the soil: a case study of Al-Ahsa Oasis, Saudi Arabia. Applied Sciences 12, 2067.Google Scholar
Mondal, I, Thakur, S, Ghosh, PB, De, TK and Bandyopadhyay, J (2018) Land use/land cover modeling of Sagar Island, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques Springer Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC), Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and information Security, 755, 771785. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1951-8_69, ISSN: 2194-5357.Google Scholar
Mondal, I, Thakur, S and De, A (2022) Application of the METRIC model for mapping evapotranspiration over the Sundarban Biosphere Reserve, India. Ecological Indicator Elsevier 136, Article 108553.Google Scholar
Morris, RS, Sanson, RL, McKenzie, JS and Marsh, WE (1993) Decision support systems in animal health, Proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (M. Thrushfield, editor), 31 March-02 April, Exeter, England, pp. 188199.Google Scholar
Mostafiz, R, Noguchi, R and Ahamed, T (2021) Agricultural land suitability assessment using satellite remote sensing-derived soil-vegetation indices. Land 10, 223.Google Scholar
Mücher, CA, Los, S, Franke, GJ and Kamphuis, C (2022) Detection, identification and posture recognition of cattle with satellites, aerial photography and UAVs using deep learning techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 43, 23772392.Google Scholar
Neethirajan, S (2020) The role of sensors, big data and machine learning in modern animal farming. Sensors Bio-Sensors 29, 100367.Google Scholar
Nikitas, A, Michalakopoulou, K, Njoya, ET and Karampatzakis, D (2020) Artificial intelligence, transport and the smart city: definitions and dimensions of a new mobility era. Sustainability 12, 2789.Google Scholar
Nisanka, R (2022) Importance of biostatic in veterinary medicine and animal science. Acta Scientific Veterinary Sciences 4, 1719.Google Scholar
NTNU, (2022) What is Biotechnology? Torgarden, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). https://www.ntnu.edu/ibt/about-us/what-is-biotechnologyGoogle Scholar
Nyamuryekung'e, S (2024) Transforming ranching: precision livestock management in the Internet of Things era. Rangelands 46, 1322. ISSN: 0190-0528.Google Scholar
Ozturk, N, Kecici, PD, Serva, L, Ekiz, B and Magrin, L (2023) Comparison of nonlinear growth models to estimate growth curves in Kivircik sheep under a semi-intensive production system Animals 13, 2379.Google Scholar
Peng, L, Chen, W, Li, M, Bai, YU and Pan, Y (2014) GIS-based study of the spatial distribution suitability of livestock and poultry farming: the case of Putian, Fujian, China. Computers and. Electronics in Agriculture 108, 183190.Google Scholar
Peralta, NR, Cicore, P, Marino, MA, Da Silva, JM and Costa, JL (2015) Use of geophysical survey as a predictor of the edaphic properties variability in soils used for livestock production. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 13, e1103.Google Scholar
Pérez-Enciso, M and Zingaretti, LM (2019) A guide on deep learning for complex trait genomic prediction Genes 10, 553.Google Scholar
Pitesky, M, Gendreau, J, Bond, T and Carrasco-Medanic, R (2020) Data challenges and practical aspects of machine learning-based statistical methods for the analyses of poultry data to improve food safety and production efficiency. CABI Reviews 15, 111.Google Scholar
Poudel, U, Dahal, U, Upadhyaya, N, Chaudhari, S and Dhakal, S (2020) Livestock and poultry production in Nepal and current status of vaccine development. Vaccines 8, 322.Google Scholar
Qiu, L, Zhu, J, Pan, Y, Hu, W and Amable, GS (2017) Multi-criteria land use suitability analysis for livestock development planning in Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 161, 10111019.Google Scholar
Quintana-Ospina, GA, Alfaro-Wisaquillo, MC, Oviedo-Rondon, EO, Ruiz-Ramirez, JR, Bernal-Arango, LC and Martinez-Bernal, GD (2023a) Effect of environmental and farm-associated factors on live performance parameters of broilers raised under commercial tropical conditions Animals 13, 3312.Google Scholar
Quintana-Ospina, GA, Alfaro-Wisaquillo, MC, Oviedo-Rondon, EO, Ruiz-Ramirez, JR, Bernal-Arango, LC and Martinez-Bernal, GD (2023b) Data analytics of broiler growth dynamics and feed conversion ratio of broilers raised to 35 d under commercial tropical conditions Animals 13, 2447.Google Scholar
Rajabi, A, Ajorlo, M and Dehghani, M (2020) Site suitability analysis for rangeland improvement and development practices (A Case Study in the Rangelands of Ghayen Plain, Iran). Geography and Development 18, 117136.Google Scholar
Rana, MMSP and Moniruzzaman, M (2023) Potential application of GIS and remote sensing to evaluate suitable site for livestock production in Northwestern part of Bangladesh. Watershed Ecology and the Environment 5, 161172. ISSN 2589-4714.Google Scholar
Rana, MMSP, Hossain, MA and Huq, ME (2022) Application of geospatial techniques to demarcate groundwater availability zone in Bangladesh. In Islam, A, Das, P, Ghosh, S, Mukhopadhyay, A, Das Gupta, A and Kumar Singh, A (eds), Fluvial Systems in the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer, pp. 435461.Google Scholar
Rana, MMSP, Moniruzzaman, M and Howlader, NH (2023) Land suitability analysis for onion cultivation in Faridpur district using geospatial technique. Jagannath University Journal of Life and Earth Sciences 8, 3346.Google Scholar
Rege, JEO and Gibson, JP (2003) Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecological Economics 45, 319330.Google Scholar
Rhodes, EC, Perotto-Baldivieso, HL, Reeves, MC and Gonzalez, LA (2022) Perspectives on the special issue for applications of remote sensing for livestock and grazing land management. Remote Sensing 14, 1882.Google Scholar
Scharf, RL (2019) Drone invasion: unmanned aerial vehicles and the right to privacy. Indiana Law Journal 94, 1065.Google Scholar
Senapati, S, Paikaray, A, Das, BC and Swain, PP (2016) Application of remote sensing in agriculture and animal husbandry, ICT programmes in livestock development problems and prospect of ICT in livestock development International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology 1, 09200925. ISSN: 2456-1878.Google Scholar
Singh, MP and Singh, P (2017) Multi-criteria GIS modeling for optimum route alignment planning in outer region of Allahabad City, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 10, 16.Google Scholar
Singh, P, Hasnat, M, Rao, MN and Singh, P (2021) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process-based GIS modelling for groundwater prospective zones in Prayagraj, India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development 12, 100530. doi: 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100530Google Scholar
Soomro, TR (2015) GIS enabling smart agriculture. Smart Agriculture: An Approach towards Better Agriculture Management 8, 16.Google Scholar
Sprague, RH Jr (1993) A framework for the development of decision support systems, decision support systems. In Sprague, RH Jr and Watson, HJ (eds), Putting Theory Into Practice, 3rd Edn. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, pp. 328.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, H, Gerber, P, Wassenaar, T, Castel, V, Rosales, M and De Haan, C (2006) Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options. Rome, Italy: FAO.Google Scholar
Terfa, BK and Suryabhagavan, KV (2015) Rangeland suitability evaluation for livestock production using remote sensing and GIS techniques in dire district, Southern Ethiopia. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research (H): Environment and Earth Science 15, 1125.Google Scholar
Tewari, A, Jain, B, Brar, B, Prasad, G and Prasad, M (2021) Biosensors: modern tools for disease diagnosis and animal health monitoring. In Biosensors in Agriculture: Recent Trends and Future Perspectives. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences. Cham: Springer, pp. 387414.Google Scholar
Thakur, S, Maity, D, Mondal, I, Basumatary, G, Ghosh, PB, Das, P and De, TK (2020) Assessment of changes in land use, land cover, and land surface temperature in the mangrove forest of Sundarbans, northeast coast of India. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23, 19171943.Google Scholar
Thomson, MC and Conner, J (2000) Environmental information systems for the control of arthropod vectors of disease. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 14, 227244.Google Scholar
Toushmalani, R (2010) Application of geophysical methods in agriculture. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4, 64336439.Google Scholar
Turğut, M and Şeker, B (2022) An exploratory investigation into the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in transportation: drone transportation and applications. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems and Applications 5, 169187.Google Scholar
Uddin, MJ, Mohiuddin, ASM, Ahmed, SU, Rahman, MK, Karim, MA and Saha, AK (2020) Suitability assessment of soils of Panchagarh and Thakurgaon for tea (Camellia sinensis L.) and orange (Citrus aurantium L.) cultivation. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 49, 467472.Google Scholar
Van Eenennaam, AL (2016) The current and future uses of biotechnology in animal agriculture. Ceiba 54, 7281.Google Scholar
Vidic, J, Manzano, M, Chang, C-M and Jaffrezic-Renault, N (2017) Advanced biosensors for detection of pathogens related to livestock and poultry. Veterinary Research 48, 11.Google Scholar
Wathes, CM, Kristensen, HH, Aerts, JM and Berckmans, D (2008) Is precision livestock farming an engineer's daydream or nightmare, an animal's friend or foe, and a farmer's panacea or pitfall? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 64, 210.Google Scholar
Weiss, M, Jacob, F and Duveiller, G (2020) Remote sensing for agricultural applications: a meta-review. Remote Sensing of Environment 236, 111402. ISSN: 0034-4257.Google Scholar
Wen, P, Li, L, Xue, H, Jia, Y, Gao, L, Li, R and Huo, L (2021) Comprehensive evaluation method of the poultry house indoor environment based on grey relation analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Poultry Science 101, 101587.Google Scholar
Wijesingha, J, Astor, T, Schulze-Brüninghoff, D, Wengert, M and Wachendorf, M (2020) Predicting forage quality of grasslands using UAV-borne imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sensing 12, 126.Google Scholar
Yulian, D, Xiujuan, L, Bo, L and Fang-Xiang, W (2021) Machine learning approaches for predicting biomolecule–disease associations. Briefings in Functional Genomics 20, 273287.Google Scholar
Zahmatkesh, H and Al-Turjman, F (2020) Fog computing for sustainable smart cities in the IoT era: caching techniques and enabling technologies - an overview. Sustainable Cities and Society 59, 102139.Google Scholar