Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fr72s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T09:11:17.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On government spending and income inequality under monopolistic competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2023

Juin-Jen Chang
Affiliation:
Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei City, Taiwan
Jang-Ting Guo*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
Wei-Neng Wang
Affiliation:
Department of International Business, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: Jang-Ting Guo; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper systematically examines the theoretical and quantitative interrelations between government spending and disposable income inequality in a tractable monopolistically competitive Ramsey macroeconomy. Upon an increase in government size, we analytically show that whether the long-run after-tax Gini coefficient rises or falls depends on the sign and magnitude of the wealth/capital inequality effect versus those of the adjusted-labor effect. Under (i) a mild level of productive public expenditure externalities and (ii) a sufficiently high intertemporal elasticity of consumption substitution, our calibrated model is able to generate qualitatively as well as quantitatively consistent income inequality effects of government spending vis-à-vis recent estimation results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Algan, Y., Chéron, A., Hairault, J.-O. and Langot, F. (2003) Wealth effect on labor market transitions. Review of Economic Dynamics 6(1), 156178.10.1016/S1094-2025(02)00013-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, E., D’Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M. and Esposito, L. (2017) Does government spending affect income inequality? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys 31(4), 961987.10.1111/joes.12173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschauer, D. A. (1989) Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics 23(2), 177200.10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98(5, Part 2), S103S125.10.1086/261726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, S. and Fernald, J. G. (1997) Returns to scale in U.S. production: Estimates and implications. Journal of Political Economy 105(2), 249283.10.1086/262073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M. and King, R. G. (1993) Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review 83, 315334.Google Scholar
Bénassy, J.-P. (1996) Monopolistic competition, increasing returns to specialization and output persistence. Economic Letters 52(2), 187191.10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00856-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F. and Ventura, J. (2000) A representative consumer theory of distribution. American Economic Review 90(4), 909926.10.1257/aer.90.4.909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, S. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2012) Infrastructure and inequality. European Economic Review 56(8), 17301745.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chirinko, R. S. and Fazzari, S. M. (1994) Economic fluctuations, market power, and returns to scale: Evidence from firm-level data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 9, 4770.10.1002/jae.3950090105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C. and Lapham, B. J. (1996) Monopolistic competition, increasing returns, and the effects of government spending. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28(2), 233254.10.2307/2078025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C. and Lapham, B. J. (2000) Government spending and welfare with returns to specialization. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 102(4), 547561.10.1111/1467-9442.00214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerrenberg, P. and Peichl, A. (2014) The impact of redistributive policies on inequality in OECD countries. Applied Economics 17, 20662086.10.1080/00036846.2014.892202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G. and Petersen, B. C. (1988) Market structure and cyclical fluctuations in U.S. manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(1), 5566.10.2307/1928150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberts, R. W. (1986) Estimating the Contribution of Urban Public Infrastructure to Regional Growth. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Working Paper No. 8610.10.26509/frbc-wp-198610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Peñalosa, C. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2009) The dynamics of wealth inequality on a simple ramsey model: A note on the role of production flexibility. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13(2), 250262.10.1017/S1365100508070508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Peñalosa, C. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2011) Taxation and income distribution dynamics in a neoclassical growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43(8), 15431577.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00458.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. (2013) A tax-based estimate of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. Quarterly Journal of Finance 3(01), 135001.10.1142/S2010139213500018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzi, M. and Kahanec, M. (2018) Income Inequality and the Size of Government: A Causal Analysis. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Discussion Paper No. 12015.Google Scholar
Hall, R. (1986) Market structure and macroeconomic fluctuations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2(2), 285338.10.2307/2534476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D. and Rosen, H. S. (1993) The carnegie conjecture: Some empirical evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(2), 413435.10.2307/2118337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiber, C. and Kotz, S. (2003) Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471457175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Edenhofer, O. and Lessmann, K. (2018) Infrastructure and inequality: Insights from incorporating key economic facts about household heterogeneity. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(4), 864895.10.1017/S1365100516000432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitner, J. and Stolyarov, D. (2004) Aggregate returns to scale and embodied technical change: Theory and measurement using stock market data. Journal of Monetary Economics 51(1), 191233.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberati, P. (2015) The world distribution of income and its inequality, 1970-2009. Review of Income and Wealth 61(2), 248273.10.1111/roiw.12088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, H. and Servén, L. (2006) A Normal Relationship? Poverty, Growth and Inequality. World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 3814.10.1596/1813-9450-3814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2002) True world income distribution, 1988 and 1993: First calculation based on household surveys alone. Economic Journal 112(476), 5192.10.1111/1468-0297.0j673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C. J. (1990) Market Power, Economic Profitability and Productivity Growth Measurement: An Integrated Structural Approach. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 3355.10.3386/w3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, C. B. (2002) Capital, Interest, and Aggregate Intertemporal Substitution. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 9373.10.3386/w9373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD Income Distribution Database (2020) Gini, poverty, income, methods and concepts. https://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm Google Scholar
Pinkovsky, M. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2009) Parametric Estimations of the World Distribution of Income. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 15433.10.3386/w15433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. and García-Peñalosa, C. (2008) Distributional dynamics in a neoclassical growth model: The role of elastic labor supply. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32(5), 13991461.10.1016/j.jedc.2007.05.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vissing-Jørgensen, A. and Attanasio, O. P. (2003) Stock-market participation, intertemporal substitution, and risk-aversion. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 93(2), 383391.10.1257/000282803321947399CrossRefGoogle Scholar