Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T19:22:32.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of computerised and pencil-and-paper neuropsychological assessments in older culturally and linguistically diverse Australians – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2022

Zara A. Page
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Karen Croot
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Perminder S. Sachdev
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Neuropsychiatric Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney Australia Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
John D. Crawford
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Ben C.P. Lam
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Henry Brodaty
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Amanda Miller Amberber
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Katya Numbers
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Nicole A. Kochan
Affiliation:
Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Corrigendum
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2022

In the original version of this article there was an error in Supplemental Materials Tables S1-S6 and in the seventh and eighth paragraph of the Results. The label for change in F-value was incorrect. This has now been corrected for S1-S6. Row 5 column 7 of Table S1 incorrectly read .486. This has been corrected to .468. Row 2 column 6 of Table S4 incorrectly read -0.091. This has been corrected to 0.091. The following changes have been made to the attached versions of S3, S5 and S6. The order of variable labels in column 1 of Tables S3 and S6 was incorrect. The correct order is as follows: Residency, English Edu., Comm. Assoc., AoA., Preference., % English, Non-English use. Step 2 Row 7 data have been removed to reflect updated variable label order. Rows 1-11 of Table S5, “Step 1 – Step 3” results were incorrectly duplicated from Table S2 rows 1-11, “Step 1 – Step 3”. The beta and standardised beta co-efficients and p-values for Table S5 have been corrected.

The seventh and eight paragraphs of the “Results” section, “Explanatory variables for CALD performance on PnPA and CNA” reflected the error in Tables S3, S5, and S6.

The final sentence for paragraph seven should read as follows:

Years of residency in Australia was an individual significant predictor (Steps 2 and 3).

The final sentence for paragraph eight should read as follows:

Years of residency in Australia and years of education in English (Step 2), and years of education in English and frequency of using languages other than English (Step 3) were significant individual predictors.

The authors apologise for this error.

References

Page, Z., Croot, K., Sachdev, P., Crawford, J., Lam, B., Brodaty, H., … Kochan, N. (2021). Comparison of Computerised and Pencil-and-Paper Neuropsychological Assessments in Older Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Australians. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 114. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721001314 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed