Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:32:56.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychotherapy and Ethics

A Postscript

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present writer had already sent to the printer his reflections on Psychotherapy and Ethics) before the opportunity came to him of reading Dr. J. C. Flugel’s recent book on the same subject. Dr. Flugel’s approach is, naturally enough, very different from our own. He writes as a psychologist pure and simple, and with a minimum (at least in intention) of extra-psychological presuppositions. He is moreover a convinced and orthodox—though also a “progressive” and by no means uncritical—Freudian; but he is unusually open to interests and considerations outside his own professional province and writes with an ease and urbanity uncommon to his kind. Last but not least, he is gifted with a quality which, as has often been remarked, seems to be singularly rare (but, one might have thought, singularly necessary) among psychologists—a keen sense of humour.

The great value and importance of Dr. Flugel’s book lies in the fact that it presents us with a remarkably candid, thorough and comprehensive treatment, from a psychoanalyst’s own viewpoint, of the subject which has recently engaged our own attention. In certain important matters his conclusions strikingly anticipate and confirm our own. In particular we would draw attention to the frankness with which he dismisses the contention that psychotherapy, as a “pure science”, can confine its attention to the means of human conduct and disregard consideration of the ends and values which are the province of ethics (pp. 12 ff., 30 ff.) Indeed it is precisely because he believes that the analytical exploration of psychological means modifies our apprehension of these ends and values that he has written and published the book at all; in the belief, that is to say, that from psychoanalysis (notwithstanding its many candidly recognised insufficiencies) many lessons may be learned “concerning the general nature of human morality and the general lines of moral progress” (p. 240, cf. Preface).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1945 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

References

(1) Blackfriars, August, 1945, pp. 287 ff.

(2) Man, Morals and Society: A Psycho‐analytical Study, by J. C. Flugel, B. A., D.Sc. (London: Duckworth; 21s.).

(3) The biologists, on their side, seem to be increasingly anxious to pass the ball back to the psychologists: Carrel's Man the Unknown, Kennefh Walker's Diapnosis of Man and the remarkable last chapter of V. H. Mottram's “Pelican” book on The Physical Basis of Personality bear witness to the game of shuttlecock which the specialists play with poor Modern Man !

(4) The uninitiated will find no more lucid explanation of these uncouth terms than in Dr. Flugel's own book.

(5) This point has been developed at somewhat greater length in the present writer's Frontiers of Theology and Psychology (Guild of Pastoral Psychology).

(6) Epistle to the Romans, vii. 7 ff.

(7) Psychology and the Religious Quest, by R. B. Cattell (Nelson Discussion Books) may be studied as one of the most honest, candid and ingenious efforts at scientific idol‐manufacture; a reductio ad absurdum of human endeavour to satisfy man's own thirst for the Absolute.

(8) Most notably in Das goettliche Kind (Amsterdam‐Leipzig, 1940).

(9) Psychology and Religion (quoted by Flugel, p. 267).

(10) Contributions to Analytical Psychology, p. 225.

(11) ibid. p. 62.

A correction has been issued for this article: