Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:58:25.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are the distributions of carbohydrates, meals and snacks associated with blood glucose control in women with gestational diabetes? A pilot study using myfood24 dietary assessment tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

J. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds
M. Morris
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds
C. Gianfrancesco
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds
N.A. Alwan
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton
J.E. Cade
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have a higher risk of maternal and fetal complications than healthy pregnant women( Reference Petry 1 ). To reduce this risk, the latest guidance is to achieve fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels below 5·3 mmol/l and 1 hour post meal levels of below 7·8 mmol/l( 2 ). First line treatment is to encourage a healthy diet including carbohydrate (CHO) management; but evidence is lacking for a recommended daily CHO distribution( Reference Uplinger 3 ). Our aim was to explore CHO, meal and snack distribution in relation to blood glucose control.

200 women recently diagnosed with GDM (aged 20–43 years) attending the Diabetes Antenatal Clinic at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust recorded their diet for up to five days using myfood24 – a new online 24 h dietary recall tool( Reference Carter, Albar and Morris 4 ). 115 women also recorded their fasting blood glucose (FBG) for up to seven days (and 103 recorded post-meal blood glucose). All continued to receive usual pregnancy care for women with GDM. For the analyses, women were split into two groups: (A) those achieving the FBG target (<5·3 mmol/L) and (B) those who did not on average over the blood sampling days. Analysis determined whether there were significant differences between groups (A) and (B) in relation to i) frequency of meal consumption (using Chi2 tests), ii) distribution of calories and CHO over six eating periods across the day (using Mann-Whitney tests), iii) percentage of meals and snacks with 30 to 50 g CHO/meal and ⩽20 g of CHO/snack period (often advised in practise). Similar analyses were undertaken to compare women who achieved post-breakfast blood glucose target with those who did not.

Those who achieved FBG targets (A) were more likely to consume three meals a-day and snack in each of the three snacking periods than those who did not (B) (3 meals a day: 92 % v. 78 %, p = 0·04; 3 snacking period: 11 % v. 4 %, p = 0·05). In terms of distribution of CHO and energy across meals and snacks, significant differences between groups A & B were only found for evening snacks and drinks: women achieving FBG targets (group A) consumed a higher percentage of their carbohydrates (p = 0·01) and energy (p = 0·03) from evening snacks and drinks (see table). Furthermore, group A were more likely to consume >20 g of carbohydrate in evening snacks (p = 0·02). No other significant differences were found in relation to the good practise advice. No significant differences were found comparing women achieving post-breakfast blood glucose targets and those who did not.

In conclusion, increased evening snacking was associated with achieving fasting blood glucose targets in this pilot study; however this was contrary to clinical expectations.

myfood24 was developed with an MRC Grant G1100235.

References

1. Petry, CJ (2010) Br J Nutr 104, 775–87.Google Scholar
3. Uplinger, N (2009) Curr Diab Rep 4, 291–5.Google Scholar
4. Carter, MC, Albar, SA, Morris, MA et al. (2015) Nutrients 7, 40164032.Google Scholar