Case Reports
The right aortic arch is a congenital vascular anomaly, which may form a vascular ring that causes respiratory failure after birth.Reference Berg, Bender and Soukup1–Reference Yoo, Min, Lee, Roman, Jaeggi and Smallhorn4 However, prenatal identification of the branching pattern of brachiocephalic vessels as shown by conventional two-dimensional echocardiography is often limited. Here, we clearly demonstrated the vascular arrangement in a fetus with right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery using HDlive Flow imaging.
A 38-year-old gravida 2 para 0 woman was referred to our hospital for a prenatal checkup. At 18 weeks of gestation, a fetal ultrasound screening demonstrated right aortic arch associated with the left ductus arteriosus (i.e. U shape sign), although no structural defects were noted except for the vascular abnormalities. At 26 weeks of gestation, fetal echocardiography using HDlive Flow imaging (Voluson E10; GE Healthcare, Zipf, Austria) demonstrated the following findings: the right aortic arch and the left ductus arteriosus consisted of a vascular ring surrounding the trachea (Figure 1a). The left common carotid artery, the right common carotid artery, and the right subclavian artery branched from the aortic arch in order. In addition, the left subclavian artery was arising near the junction of the aorta and the ductus arteriosus behind the trachea and the oesophagus (Figure 1b, Suppelementary Video S1, S2). Thus, the fetus was diagnosed with right aortic arch with the aberrant left subclavian artery. The female baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation, weighing 3111 g with Apgar scores of 5 and 8 at 1 and 5 min, respectively. Her neonatal clinical course was uneventful except that the right aortic arch with the aberrant left subclavian artery was noted.
The various anomalies of right aortic arch with ductus arteriosus include right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery; right aortic arch with mirror-image branching; double aortic arch; and isolation of left subclavian artery. Among them, right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and double aortic arch may form a vascular ring that causes respiratory failure.Reference Berg, Bender and Soukup1–Reference Yoo, Min, Lee, Roman, Jaeggi and Smallhorn4 Therefore, a prenatal diagnosis of this vascular arrangement could contribute to optimal care after birth. However, prenatal identification of the branching pattern of brachiocephalic vessels is often limited by acoustic windows and sonographer experience.Reference Campanale, Pasquini and Santangelo2 Recently, several clinical advantages of three-/ four-dimensional ultrasound imaging to diagnose fetal aortic arch anomalies have been reported.Reference Tseng, Peng and Jan3–Reference Wang, Fan and Siddiqui5 Regarding HDlive Flow imaging, once the volume data are acquired, we could manipulate the data to recreate views that enable identification of the vascular arrangement later. In the present case, all brachiocephalic vessels (i.e. left subclavian artery, left common carotid artery, right common carotid artery, and right subclavian artery) could be visualised on one screen at a glance (Figure 1 and Supplementary Video S1, S2). In addition, we could move the appropriate three-dimensional images in any direction to confirm the vascular arrangement (Supplementary Video S1, S2). Finally, glass body algorithms enabled us to demonstrate the tracheal lumen surrounded by the vascular ring by the adjustment of a light source (Figure 1a). Thus, HDlive Flow imaging could provide additional information about the fetus with aortic arch abnormalities like a vascular ring.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951120001079
Acknowledgements
None.
Financial support
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial,f or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Ethical standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.