Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:01:05.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of the temperate calcareous sponge Grantia sp. to ocean acidification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2024

Alice McCullough ,
Francesca Strano ,
Valerio Micaroni ,
Lisa Woods  and
James J. Bell Open the ORCID record for James J. Bell [Opens in a new window]
Alice McCullough
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
Francesca Strano
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
Valerio Micaroni
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
Lisa Woods
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
James J. Bell*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: James J. Bell; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sponges are important components of marine systems globally, and while sponges have generally been shown to tolerate ocean acidification (OA), most earlier studies have focused on demosponges with siliceous skeletons. In contrast, little is known of how calcareous sponges, with calcite or aragonite skeletons, may react to OA conditions. Here we measured tissue necrosis and respiration rate of the temperate New Zealand calcareous sponge Grantia sp. to simulated OA. Our treatment conditions were based on the IPCC RCP8.5 (pCO2 1131.9 ± 113 μatm) scenario over a 28 day experiment, and responses were compared to current day control conditions (pCO2 512.59 ± 23 μatm). Sponge respiration rate was not significantly different between the control and treatment sponges and there was no evidence of tissue necrosis over the course of the experiment. Overall, our study is consistent with earlier studies on demosponges, showing calcareous sponges to be resilient to OA.

Keywords

climate changepHPoriferarespirationspicules
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 104 , 2024 , e54
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (CO2 atm) are currently around 417 ppm, which is over 100 ppm more than prior to the industrial revolution (NOAA, 2021). CO2 atm levels are predicted to rise beyond 1000 ppm by the year 2100 if no action is taken to reduce CO2 emissions (IPCC, 2021). Due to its buffering abilities, the ocean has absorbed approximately a quarter of the CO2 that has been released into the atmosphere from anthropogenic activities, resulting in decreased ocean pH (IPCC, 2021). Under the worst-case scenario, by 2100 ocean pH is predicted to decrease by a further 0.3–0.5 units (Orr et al., Reference Orr, VJ, Aumont, Bopp, SC, RA, Gnanadesikan, Gruber, Ishida, Joos and RM2005; The Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 8.5; IPCC, 2021). This changing ocean chemistry is leading to an increase in hydrogen ions (H+) in a phenomenon known as ocean acidification (OA), which has the potential to impact a wide range of marine organisms (Caldeira and Wickett, Reference Caldeira and Wickett2003; Kroeker et al., Reference Kroeker, Kordas, Crim and Singh2010;, Reference Kroeker, Kordas, Crim, Hendriks, Ramajo, Singh, Duarte and Gattuso2013).

There are a number of ways that marine organisms can be impacted by OA, although most focus has been on calcifying organisms, particularly molluscs, echinoderms, corals and crustaceans (Medeiros and Souza, Reference Medeiros and Souza2023). These impacts include changes to growth, metabolism, acid-base balance, calcification, survival rates, settlement, reproduction and cell signalling processes (Espinel-Velasco et al., Reference Espinel-Velasco, Hoffmann, Agüera, Byrne, Dupont, Uthicke, Webster and Lamare2018; Melzner et al., Reference Melzner, Mark, Seibel and Tomanek2020; Medeiros and Souza, Reference Medeiros and Souza2023). Of particular concern is the dissolution of calcium carbonate structures, particularly as a result of biominerals being prone to dissolution when seawater is undersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate (Melzner et al., Reference Melzner, Mark, Seibel and Tomanek2020). While much of the focus of such dissolution has focused on coral reefs (Cornwall et al., Reference Cornwall, Comeau, Kornder, Perry, van Hooidonk, DeCarlo, Pratchett, Anderson, Browne, Carpenter and Diaz-Pulido2021), many other organisms with calcium carbonate structures are at risk. Furthermore, disruption of acid-base regulation ability and cell signalling pathways may actually interfere with the process of calcification either directly or indirectly (see Melzner et al., Reference Melzner, Mark, Seibel and Tomanek2020 for review).

Sponges are abundant benthic organisms in temperate, polar, and tropical marine ecosystems (Bell et al., Reference Bell, McGrath, Kandler, Marlow, Beepat, Bachtiar, Shaffer, Mortimer, Macaroni, Mobilia, Rovellini, Harris, Farnham, Strano and Carballo2020). As sedentary suspension feeders, sponges are integral in linking benthic and pelagic ecosystems, filtering large volumes of water per unit body mass, retaining small particles and nutrients, and providing a link to higher trophic levels (Turton et al., Reference Turton, Galera and Uriz1997; Bell, Reference Bell2002; Perea-Blázquez et al., Reference Perea-Blázquez, Price, Davy and Bell2010; De Goeij et al., Reference De Goeij, Van Oevelen, Vermeij, Osinga, Middelburg, De Goeij and Admiraal2013). Due to their sessile nature and the presence of an aquaferous system, sponges are continuously exposed to ambient seawater, potentially increasing their vulnerability to alterations in seawater chemistry (Bergquist, Reference Bergquist1978; Aguilar-Camacho and McCormack, Reference Aguilar-Camacho, McCormack, JL and JJ2017). However, despite this, some sponges can tolerate changes in salinity (e.g. Leamon and Fell, Reference Leamon and Fell1990) and have been shown to both osmoregulate (Brauer, Reference Brauer1975) and control intracellular pH (e.g. Webb et al., Reference Webb, Pomponi, van Duyl, Reichart and de Nooijer2019). These abilities of sponges may enable them to cope with changes in the pH of the surrounding seawater, although this might come with increased metabolic demand.

A number of studies have shown tropical sponges to be resilient to climate change impacts (Fabricius et al., Reference Fabricius, Langdon, Uthicke, Humphrey, Noonan, De'ath, Okazaki, Muehllehner, Glas and Lough2011; Wissak et al., Reference Wissak, Schönberg, Form and Freiwald2012;, Reference Wissak, Schönberg, Form and Freiwald2014; Fang et al., Reference Fang, Mello-Athayde, Schönberg, Kline, Hoegh-Guldberg and Dove2013; Bennett et al., Reference Bennett, Altenrath, Woods, Davy, Webster and Bell2016; Bell et al., Reference Bell, Bennett, Rovellini and Webster2018; Agostini et al., Reference Agostini, Harvey, Wada, Kon, Milazzo, Inaba and Hall-Spencer2018), but far less known about temperate sponges (but see Goodwin et al., Reference Goodwin, Roldolfo-Metalpa, Picton and Hall-Spencer2013; Bates and Bell, Reference Bates and Bell2018). Importantly, the majority of all previous sponge climate studies have focused on demosponges with siliceous skeletons, with much less know about climate impacts on calcareous sponges species that have spicules made of calcium carbonate (see Bell et al., Reference Bell, Bennett, Rovellini and Webster2018). Class Calcarea make up approximately 5–8% of the phylum Porifera, with many species still undescribed (Uriz, Reference Uriz2006; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Berman, Key and Winter2013). Calcareous sponges are often abundant in caves and other dark environments where they can be more abundant than demosponges (e.g. Bell, Reference Bell2002; Rapp, Reference Rapp2006; Fromont et al., Reference Fromont, Althaus, McEnnulty, Williams, Salotti, Gomez, Gowlett-Holmes, Maldonado, Becerro and Uriz2012). Calcareous sponges are the only sponge class with spicules formed of calcium carbonate (Jones, Reference Jones1970). Therefore, these sponges may be more vulnerable to OA impacts compared to demosponges. However, earlier studies have found the spicules of calcareous sponges to be surrounded by an organic sheath (Jones, Reference Jones1955), which has the potential to prevent dissolution of spicules once formed.

To date, only two experimental laboratory studies have considered the impact of OA on non-tropical calcareous sponges (Peck et al., Reference Peck, Clark, Power, Reis, Batista and Harper2015; Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro, Padua, Barno, Villela, Duarte, Rossi, Fernandes, Peixoto and Klautau2020). Peck et al. (Reference Peck, Clark, Power, Reis, Batista and Harper2015) found that Leucosolenia sp. increased in abundance 2.5-fold in low pH (pH 7.7, pCO2 not given) conditions compared to controls and suggested that sponge resilience may be a result of the organic sheath described above (see Jones, Reference Jones1955). More recently, a 9-day laboratory study by Ribeiro et al. (Reference Ribeiro, Padua, Barno, Villela, Duarte, Rossi, Fernandes, Peixoto and Klautau2020) examined the effect of temperature, pH, and their combined effects on the skeleton and microbial community of the calcareous sponge Sycettusa hastifera (Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro, Padua, Barno, Villela, Duarte, Rossi, Fernandes, Peixoto and Klautau2020; treatment conditions: control: 22 °C, pH 8.1, pCO2 301 ± 30 μ atm; low pH: 22 °C, pH 7.6, pCO2 1182 ± 119 μ atm; high temperature: 26 °C, pH 8.1, pCO2 278 ± 319 μ atm; combined effects: 26 °C, pH 7.6, pCO2 1156 ± 167 μ atm). These authors found that none of the treatments caused any significant sponge degeneration, but they did find that higher temperature affected spicule shape, and sponges in the reduced pH treatment had smaller spicules in their exterior layer (Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro, Padua, Barno, Villela, Duarte, Rossi, Fernandes, Peixoto and Klautau2020).

These limited earlier studies show the potential resilience of calcareous sponges to OA, but longer experiments with more species are needed before any generalisations can be made. We hypothesise that calcareous sponge respiration rates will increase as a result of OA impacting cellular processes, particularly the maintenance of intracellular pH. To test this we conducted a 28-day experiment, to measure respiration rate (as a measure of metabolic demand) and tissue necrosis in the calcareous sponge Grantia sp. Sponges were exposed to pH 7.6 (treatment, pCO2 1131.9 ± 113 μ atm) and pH 8 (control, pCO2 512.59 ± 23 μ atm), consistent with the IPCC RCP8.5 scenario for 2100 (IPCC, 2013).

Materials and methods

Grantia sp. is a common New Zealand sponge that has an off-white colouration and a network of delicate erect singular tubes, with oscula that are slightly hispid (Dendy, Reference Dendy1924). This species is typically found in rocky caves and on vertical reef walls that experience high levels of turbulence and water flow. A 28-day laboratory experiment was undertaken to investigate how our study species is affected by the IPCC worst case scenario RCP8.5 conditions. We compared sponges kept in three replicate treatment tanks (pCO2 1131.9 ± 113 μ atm) to three control tanks (pCO2 512.59 ± 23 μ atm) (Bates and Bell, Reference Bates and Bell2018; Figure S1). Eighty-one Grantia sp. were collected via SCUBA from Breaker Bay, Wellington, New Zealand (41° 19′ 58′′ S, 174° 49′ 52′′ E) (see Bates and Bell, Reference Bates and Bell2018 for location).

Sponges were attached to ceramic tiles and haphazardly placed in tanks, with a total of 13 sponges in each tank (6 tanks in total) and acclimated for two weeks, after which a secondary acclimation period began where the pH was reduced in the treatment tanks by 0.1 units per day until the desired pH/pCO2 was reached to simulate a gradual OA decline (e.g. Johnson et al., Reference Johnson, Rodriguez Bravo, O'connor, Varley and Altieri2019). A Neptune APEX controller (Neptune System LLC, USA) was used to keep the tanks within 0.1 unit of the target value via the slow-release bubbling of CO2 from a solenoid box connected to a 6.8 kg CO2 cylinder. The sponges were kept at the average mean temperature (13 °C) for the Wellington South Coast (Greater Wellington Regional Council, 2021), which was also similar to the temperature at the time of collection. This temperature was maintained inside a 100L header tank (see Figure S1) using a heater and chiller that were controlled automatically using the APEX system. The water from a main tank was transferred into individual secondary header tanks (see supplemental information for more information), which then flowed into a corresponding tank where the 13 sponges per tank were housed (n = 39 per treatment). Temperature and pH were monitored weekly (Supplemental Table S1) throughout the experiment using the APEX probes and real-time measurements of pH(T) (mV) using a HQ40d portable pH multi-parameter (HACH, USA). To determine the carbonate chemistry of the system pHT [H + ], total alkalinity (TA), temperature and salinity were measured throughout the experiment to complete the calculations using dissociation constant of water and Henry's law (Zeebe, Reference Zeebe2012) (Tables 1 and S1).

Table 1. Summary of measured (*) and calculated (**) seawater parameters represented as the mean (±SD) of measurements taken during the acclimation period and weekly during the experiment (n = 4 sampling periods)

Measured values of temperature, salinity, pH (pHT), and total alkalinity (TA) were measured in all aquaria weekly. pCO2 (μ atm) and seawater saturation states (Ωca and Ωar) were calculated by entering the recorded values of temperature, pHT, salinity and TA into the CO2 calc software (Robbins et al., Reference Robbins, Hansen, Kleypas and Meylan2010).

At T0, baseline respiration measurements were made for three randomly selected sponges per tank (meaning a total n = 9 per treatment), thereafter respiration rates were measured on day T3, T6, T14, T17, T24, and T28 (Tend). Randomisation was achieved using the numbers on the tiles and random number tables. We used a similar method as Bates and Bell (Reference Bates and Bell2018), Cummings et al. (Reference Cummings, Beaumont, Bell, Tracey, Clark and Barr2020), and Micaroni et al. (Reference Micaroni, Strano, McAllen, Woods, Turner, Harman and Bell2021). See supplemental information for further details.

All statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.1.3 (R Core Team, 2013). The effects of pCO2 (ambient – control), RCP8.5 (treatment) and time (day of measurement throughout the 28 day trial, T0–T28) were tested using linear mixed-effects models (LMM) with normally distributed errors and random intercepts (lmer, lme4 package; Bates et al., Reference Bates, Maechler, Bolker and Walker2015). Treatment and time were considered fixed effects and experimental tank was considered a random effect. An experimental tank effect was included to address pseudoreplication and possible tank effects (Hurlbert, Reference Hurlbert1984). For all the models, fixed- and random-effect terms were tested using the function anova and ranova (R package lmerTest, Kuznetsova et al., Reference Kuznetsova, Brockhoff and Christensen2017). The goodness of fit, normality and homoscedasticity of the errors were checked for all models by inspecting plots of the normalised residuals and the quantile-quantile plots (see Figure S3). For mixed-effect models there were slight concerns about normality of residuals, so the analyses were supplemented with a more robust non-parametric model (univariate PERMANOVA, Anderson, Reference Anderson2001, Reference Anderson2014).

Results

There were no signs of tissue necrosis in any of the control or treatment sponges over the course of the experiment. Respiration rate of Grantia sp. (Figure 1) fluctuated over the course of the experiment for both the control and treatment sponges. The LMM analysis determined that treatment had no significant effect on the sponge respiration (F 1,102 = 2.18, p = 0.14; Table S2). However, there was a significant effect of time on respiration rate (F 1,102 = 9.27, p = 0.003; Table S2). Both treatment and controls experienced an approximate 50% reduction in mean respiration rate over the experiment based on a comparison between T0 and T28 (Figure 1). The PERMANOVA model confirmed the results of the mixed-effect model (Table S3).

Figure 1. Change in mean respiration rate (mgO2 g−1 min−1) of Grantia sp. over a 28 day experiment exposed to pCO2 1131.9 ± 113 μ atm (pH 7.6) and pCO2 512.59 ± 23 μ atm (pH 8). Error bars indicate standard deviation.

Discussion

While there is a considerable amount of data available on the impacts of OA and warming on demosponges, we know comparatively little about calcareous sponges. Grantia sp. showed no signs of tissue necrosis over the course of the experiment. We also found no impact of our OA simulation on the respiration rate of sponges, although there was an effect of time. Our results are consistent with the emerging picture that calcareous sponges show tolerance to changes in the pH of the external environment.

Reduced ocean pH can cause serious physiological stress to marine organisms, resulting in alterations to respiration rates as they use their energy to activate detoxification and survival mechanisms (Sokolova et al., Reference Sokolova, Frederich, Bagwe, Lanning and Sukhotin2012). Several recent reviews have examined the impacts of OA on the physiology and ecology of marine invertebrates. Both Shi and Li (Reference Shi and Li2023) and Medeiros and Souza (Reference Medeiros and Souza2023) identified a number of broader direct and indirect impacts on marine invertebrates including impacts on calcification, behaviour, immunity, energy budget, metabolism, growth, development, genetics, oxidative stress, and disruption of acid-base balance. These reviews highlight the wide range of invertebrates that are negatively impacted by OA. However, results for our study species, and the previous studies on OA impacts on calcareous sponges (see Peck et al., Reference Peck, Clark, Power, Reis, Batista and Harper2015; Ribeiro et al., Reference Ribeiro, Padua, Barno, Villela, Duarte, Rossi, Fernandes, Peixoto and Klautau2020) contrast with reported impacts on other organisms with calcareous skeletons. For example, calcium carbonate accretion by reef building corals in tropical ecosystems is expected to be reduced 156% by 2100 under the worst case RCP 8.5 scenario (Cornwall et al., Reference Cornwall, Comeau, Kornder, Perry, van Hooidonk, DeCarlo, Pratchett, Anderson, Browne, Carpenter and Diaz-Pulido2021). However, no negative physiological impacts were found for our study species. A number of previous studies have suggested that sponges may be winners in future warmer and more acidic oceans (e.g. Bell et al., Reference Bell, Davy, Jones, Taylor and Webster2013), however, this hypothesis is based largely on tropical demosponges, with far less known about the climate change impacts on temperate species, and particularly calcareous sponges. Our results support this hypothesis for temperate calcareous sponges, albeit based on a single species, at least in responses to OA.

We found no significant differences in the respiration rate of Grantia sp. between the control and treatment sponges, however, we did find a significant effect of time in both treatments. Both control and treatment sponge respiration rates declined over the course of the 28 day experiment however, the sponges did not show any other signs of deterioration over this period, suggesting that they stayed healthy in experimental set up. We believe the decline in respiration rates over time was likely due to lower food in our experimental system compared to natural environments. Our respiration results contrast with those for a non-calcareous temperate sponge, Tethya bergquistae. For this sponge, respiration increased in response to low pH conditions compared to the controls (treatment pH 7.6; pCO2 1514 ± 13.6 μ atm). (Bates and Bell, Reference Bates and Bell2018). Intracellular pH (pHi) directly impacts basic cell functions (Casey et al., Reference Casey, Feinstein and Orlowski2010), therefore, the increase in respiration rate of the T. bergquistae could be a result of cellular acidosis as seen with increased temperature in corals and their symbionts (Gibbin et al., Reference Gibbin, Putman, Gates, Nitschke and Davy2015), and with decreased pH in corals and other marine invertebrates (Orr et al., Reference Orr, VJ, Aumont, Bopp, SC, RA, Gnanadesikan, Gruber, Ishida, Joos and RM2005). However, consistent with our study, Bates and Bell (Reference Bates and Bell2018) did not find a significant change in the respiration rate of a second demosponge species, Crella incrustans, which was exposed to the same conditions. Species specific differences might occur due to differences in acid-base regulation abilities (Pörtner et al., Reference Pörtner, Langenbuch and Reipschläger2004), which may explain why T. bergquistae has a different response than either C. incrustans or our study species, although little is known about acid-base regulation specifically in sponges and needs further investigation.

Conclusion

We found no evidence for negative impacts of reducing ocean pH on the calcareous sponge Grantia sp., with our study providing evidence that despite calcareous sponges having calcareous spicules they are resilient to the short term impacts of changing pH. However, the exact mechanisms of tolerance still require further investigation, particularly around how sponges either regulate internal pH conditions or how they tolerate changes to pH without increasing energy expenditure.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315424000419.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available on request from the authors

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the help of members of the Victoria University of Wellington Bell sponge ecology group; Ben Harris, Imke Maiken Böök, Nora Kandler, Rama Bachtiar, Sandeep Beepat and Meghan Shaffer, for their advice on laboratory processes and assistance with field work. We are also grateful to Christopher Cornwall, Aleluia Taise, Erik Krieger and Imke Maiken Böök, for assistance with the carbonate chemistry.

Author contributions

AR, JJB, FS and VM designed the experiment. AR ran the experiments, while VM and FR collected sampled. LW, AM and VM conducted the statistical analysis. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

All laboratory work was supported by Victoria University of Wellington. FS and VM were supported by Victoria University of Wellington doctoral scholarships.

Competing interests

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

References

Agostini, S, Harvey, B, Wada, S, Kon, K, Milazzo, M, Inaba, K and Hall-Spencer, J (2018) Ocean acidification drives community shifts towards simplified non-calcified habitats in a subtropical-temperate transition zone. Scientific Reports 8(1), 11354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29251-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilar-Camacho, J and McCormack, G (2017) Molecular responses of sponges to climate change, climate change. In JL, Carballo and JJ, Bell (eds), Ocean Acidification and Sponges. Cham: Springer, pp. 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59008-0_4Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.Google Scholar
Anderson, MJ (2014) Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley statsref: statistics reference online, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T and Bell, J (2018) Responses of two temperate sponge species to ocean acidification. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 52, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J (2002) The sponge community in a semi-submerged temperate sea cave: density, diversity and richness. Marine Ecology 23, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J, Bennett, H, Rovellini, A and Webster, N (2018) Sponges to be winners under near-future climate scenarios. BioScience 68, 955–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, JJ, Davy, SK, Jones, T, Taylor, MW and Webster, NS (2013) Could some coral reefs become sponge reefs as our climate changes? Global Change Biology 19, 2613–2624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, JJ, McGrath, E, Kandler, N, Marlow, J, Beepat, S, Bachtiar, R, Shaffer, M, Mortimer, C, Macaroni, V, Mobilia, V, Rovellini, A, Harris, B, Farnham, E, Strano, F and Carballo, J (2020) Interocean patterns in shallow water sponge assemblage structure and function. Biological Reviews 95, 1720–1758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, H, Altenrath, C, Woods, L, Davy, S, Webster, N and Bell, JJ (2016) Interactive effects of temperature and pCO2 on sponges: from the cradle to the grave. Global Change Biology 23, 2031–2046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergquist, P (1978) Sponges. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brauer, EB (1975) Osmoregulation in the fresh water sponge, Spongilla lacustris. Journal of Experimental Zoology 192, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, K and Wickett, A (2003) Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casey, J, Feinstein, S and Orlowski, J (2010) Sensors and regulators of intracellular pH. Nature Review of Molecular and Cellular Biology 11, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornwall, CE, Comeau, S, Kornder, NA, Perry, CT, van Hooidonk, R, DeCarlo, TM, Pratchett, MS, Anderson, KD, Browne, N, Carpenter, R and Diaz-Pulido, G (2021) Global declines in coral reef calcium carbonate production under ocean acidification and warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2015265118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, V, Beaumont, J, Bell, JJ, Tracey, D, Clark, M and Barr, N (2020) Responses of a common New Zealand coastal sponge to elevated suspended sediments: indications of resilience. Marine Environmental Research 155, 104886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Goeij, JM, Van Oevelen, D, Vermeij, MJ, Osinga, R, Middelburg, JJ, De Goeij, AF and Admiraal, W (2013) Surviving in a marine desert: the sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science (New York, N.Y.) 342, 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dendy, A (1924) Porifera, Part I. Non-Antarctic sponges. IN: Natural History Report, British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition, 1910 (Zoology) 6, 269–392.Google Scholar
Espinel-Velasco, N, Hoffmann, L, Agüera, A, Byrne, M, Dupont, S, Uthicke, S, Webster, NS and Lamare, M (2018) Effects of ocean acidification on the settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate and fish larvae: a review. Marine Ecology Progress Series 606, 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, KE, Langdon, C, Uthicke, S, Humphrey, C, Noonan, S, De'ath, G, Okazaki, R, Muehllehner, N, Glas, MS and Lough, JM (2011) Losers and winners in coral reefs acclimatized to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Nature Climate Change 1, 165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J, Mello-Athayde, M, Schönberg, C, Kline, D, Hoegh-Guldberg, O and Dove, S (2013) Sponge biomass and bioerosion rates increase under ocean warming and ocean acidification. Global Change Biology 19, 3581–3591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromont, J, Althaus, F, McEnnulty, FR, Williams, A, Salotti, M, Gomez, O and Gowlett-Holmes, K (2012) Living on the edge: the sponge fauna of Australia's southwestern and northwestern deep continental margin. In Maldonado, M, X Turon, Becerro, MA and Uriz, Maria J (eds), Ancient Animals, New Challenges: Developments in Sponge Research. Springer, pp. 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4688-6_12Google Scholar
Gibbin, E, Putman, H, Gates, R, Nitschke, M and Davy, S (2015) Species-specific differences in thermal tolerance may define susceptibility to intracellular acidosis in reef corals. Marine Biology 162, 717–723.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C, Roldolfo-Metalpa, R, Picton, B and Hall-Spencer, J (2013) Effects of ocean acidification on sponge communities. Marine Ecology 35, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greater Wellington Regional Council (2021) Environmental Monitoring and Research Environmental Monitoring and Research (gw.govt.nz). Accessed 01 March 2021.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009157896Google Scholar
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M, Rodriguez Bravo, L, O'connor, S, Varley, N and Altieri, A (2019) pH variability exacerbates effects of ocean acidification on the Caribbean crustose coralline algae. Frontiers in Marine Science 6, 150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W (1955) The sheath of spicules of Leucosolenia complicate. Journal of Cell Science 3, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W (1970) The composition, development, form, and orientation of calcareous sponge spicules. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 25, 91–123.Google Scholar
Kroeker, KJ, Kordas, RL, Crim, R, Hendriks, IE, Ramajo, L, Singh, GS, Duarte, CM and Gattuso, JP (2013) Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Global Change Biology 19, 1884–1896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroeker, KJ, Kordas, RL, Crim, RN and Singh, GG (2010) Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms. Ecology Letters 13, 1419–1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RH (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamon, J and Fell, PE (1990) Upper salinity tolerance of and salinity-induced tissue regression in the estuarine sponge Microciona prolifera. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 109, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, IPM and Souza, MM (2023) Acid times in physiology: a systematic review of the effects of ocean acidification on calcifying invertebrates. Environmental Research 231, 116019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melzner, F, Mark, FC, Seibel, BA and Tomanek, L (2020) Ocean acidification and coastal marine invertebrates: tracking CO2 effects from seawater to the cell. Annual Review of Marine Science 12, 499–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micaroni, V, Strano, F, McAllen, R, Woods, L, Turner, J, Harman, L and Bell, J (2021) Adaptive strategies of sponges to deoxygenated oceans. Global Change Biology 28, 1972–1989.Google ScholarPubMed
NOAA (2021) Mauna Loa CO2 Monthly mean data. Available at https://gml.noaa.gov/webdata/ccgg/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt. Accessed 20 February 2021.Google Scholar
Orr, JC, VJ, Fabry, Aumont, O, Bopp, L, SC, Doney, RA, Feely, Gnanadesikan, A, Gruber, N, Ishida, A, Joos, F and RM, Key (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organism. Nature 437, 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, L, Clark, M, Power, D, Reis, J, Batista, F and Harper, E (2015) Acidification effects on biofouling communities: winners and losers. Global Change Biology 21, 1907–1913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perea-Blázquez, A, Price, K, Davy, S and Bell, JJ (2010) Diet composition of two temperate calcareous sponges: Leucosolenia echinata and Leucetta sp. from the Wellington South Coast, New Zealand. Open Marine Biology Journal 4, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pörtner, H, Langenbuch, M and Reipschläger, A (2004) Biological impact of elevated ocean CO2 concentrations: lessons from animal physiology and earth history. Journal of Oceanography 60, 705–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, HT (2006) Calcareous sponges of the genera Clathrina and Guancha (Calcinea, Calcarea, Porifera) of Norway (north-east Atlantic) with the description of five new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 147, 331–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2013).Google Scholar
Ribeiro, B, Padua, A, Barno, A, Villela, H, Duarte, G, Rossi, A, Fernandes, F, Peixoto, and Klautau, R (2020) Assessing skeleton and microbiome responses of a calcareous sponge under thermal and pH stress. ICES Journal of Marine Science 78, 855–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa231Google Scholar
Robbins, L, Hansen, M, Kleypas, J and Meylan, S (2010) CO2 calc: A User-Friendly Seawater Carbon Calculator for Windows Mac OS X, AND iOS (iPhone). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1280, 17.Google Scholar
Shi, Y and Li, Y (2023) Impacts of ocean acidification on physiology and ecology of marine invertebrates: a comprehensive review. Aquatic Ecology 58, 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-023-10058-2Google Scholar
Smith, A, Berman, J, Key, M and Winter, J (2013) Not all sponges will thrive in a high-CO2 ocean: review of the mineralogy of calcifying sponges. Palaeogeography 392, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolova, I, Frederich, M, Bagwe, R, Lanning, G and Sukhotin, A (2012) Energy homeostasis as an integrative tool for assessing limits of environmental stress tolerance in aquatic invertebrates. Marine Environmental Research 79, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turton, X, Galera, J and Uriz, M (1997) Clearance rates and aquiferous systems in two sponges with contrasting life-history strategies. Journal of Experimental Zoology 278, 22–36.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uriz, M (2006) Mineral skeletogenesis in sponges. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, 322–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, AE, Pomponi, SA, van Duyl, FC, Reichart, GJ and de Nooijer, LJ (2019) pH regulation and tissue coordination pathways promote calcium carbonate bioerosion by excavating sponges. Scientific Reports 9, 758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wissak, M, Schönberg, C, Form, A and Freiwald, A (2012) Ocean acidification accelerates reef bioerosion. PLoS One. 7: e45124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wissak, K, Schönberg, C, Form, A and Freiwald, A (2014) Sponge bioerosion accelerated by ocean acidification across species and latitudes? Helgolander 68, 253–262.Google Scholar
Zeebe, R (2012) History of seawater carbonate chemistry, atmospheric CO2, and ocean acidification. Annual Review of Earth, and Planetary Sciences 40, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Summary of measured (*) and calculated (**) seawater parameters represented as the mean (±SD) of measurements taken during the acclimation period and weekly during the experiment (n = 4 sampling periods)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Change in mean respiration rate (mgO2 g−1 min−1) of Grantia sp. over a 28 day experiment exposed to pCO2 1131.9 ± 113 μ atm (pH 7.6) and pCO2 512.59 ± 23 μ atm (pH 8). Error bars indicate standard deviation.

Supplementary material: File

McCullough et al. supplementary material

McCullough et al. supplementary material
Download McCullough et al. supplementary material(File)
File 169.1 KB