Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:00:59.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

[No Title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Fareed Bashir*
Affiliation:
Bolton, Salford and Trafford Mental Health Trust, Edenfield Centre, Prestwich Hospital, Bury New Road, Manchester M25 3BL, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

Sugarman & Nimmagadda (Psychiatric Bulletin, November 2007, 31, 404–406) make declarations of potential conflicts of interest in their piece on the independent sector. What they fail to do is to consider the potential for profit-driven mental health services to erode the human rights of individuals who fall liable to treatment under mental health legislation. Corporations that thrive financially from the forcible treatment of vulnerable individuals deserve more scrutiny. Unless the College can demonstrate the highest standards of integrity in this sensitive area, it will rightly lose its influence in our democratic institutions and squander the high regard in which it is held by the public. I feel sure that all members of the College would share my concerns.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.