Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:47:56.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Saffronization of Public Knowledge in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2024

Abstract

During the political regime of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), public knowledge in India has been tarnished with political colors. The BJP has used the color saffron, which is closely associated with the Indian National Flag, as a sociopolitical tool to signal patriotism, nationalism, indigenization, and decolonization. However, the government’s policies and messages focus on the self-profiting mechanisms of Hindutva ideology. According to the BJP, the notions of pre-colonial knowledge systems and patriotism are only related to the Hindu religion. Thus, public knowledge in India has been politicized through “saffronization”: the color saffron, rightwing political ideologies, and religious fundamentalism combine to create false beliefs about Indian history and culture, which then inspire and excuse hate and crime.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Public knowledge in India has been politicized through saffronization: the color saffron, rightwing political ideologies, and religious fundamentalism combine to create false beliefs about Indian history and culture, which then inspire and excuse hate and crime.

The saffron of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) flag is not just a color. It represents Hindutva – Hindu-ness – an ideology connected to religious and cultural puritanism that has created hatred against other religious beliefs and practices, especially Islam, by demeaning them as militants, invaders, and barbarians. The BJP’s rise to power in 2014 was marked by a saffronization of the public sphere. Tropes labeled Muslims as breeders and terrorists and provoked Hindu communities to erase them physically and geographically from India. Yet it is precisely a Hindu–Muslim sibling solidarity that can oppose the saffronization of public knowledge in India.

1. The color saffron

In the Hindu religion, saffron is regarded as a symbol of purity, sacrifice, light, and salvation. Usually, Indians who attain monkhood or gain certain forms of religious and spiritual status wear saffron robes. Eventually, they are perceived as culturally, spiritually, and ethically “pure” beings. Thus, wearing saffron robes is not just a physical act. It pushes individuals toward existential, spiritual, and intellectual exceptionality – a state of being that is, in Eduardo Kohn’s definition, “fundamentally separate from the rest of the world,” unquestionable, and far from the physical and ideological reach of ordinary folks.Footnote 1

This saffron exceptionality can only be accessed by those with specific cultural, spiritual, political, and economic privileges, such as Baba Ramdev (brand ambassador of Patanjali Ayurveda), Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh (head of the social group Dera Sacha Sauda), Asaram Bapu (self-styled Indian spiritual leader), and Radhe Maa (self-styled Indian God Woman). Despite being convicted for several cases of dowry, rape, sexual slavery, monetary extortions, and other crimes, these figures continue to be appreciated and worshipped as ideal citizens.Footnote 2

Their saffron exceptionality has enabled them to create manipulative and unquestionable structures for making public knowledge. Such structures are gatekept by socially, economically, and politically powerful individuals and are selectively accessible. No matter how myopically and unethically the structures operate, any form of criticism is put down as anti-Indian and anti-traditional.Footnote 3 With time, these rightwing saffronized structures have normalized rape culture and erased Islamic histories from the public spheres and classrooms in India.

2. The saffronization of rape culture

BJP ministers have defended the normalization of rape culture in India by citing the increasing influence of Western cultures and the loss of Hindu Puritan cultures. However, a thorough investigation shows how BJP’s interpretation of gender and sexuality is centered on the notion of hyper-masculinity. Ideas of nation, nationhood, Hindu masculinity, and religious identities have been reimagined “along gendered lines,” which serve as a “foundation of governing practices” of the BJP.Footnote 4

According to the Hindutva ideology, female chastity is defined by attitudes like silence, soft-outspokenness, and being ready to be abused by men.Footnote 5 A segment of the population (including women) feels that raping, abusing, schooling, and silencing women in India are essential correctional processes to maintain the cultural and traditional roots of India and preserve a Hindu Puritan image.Footnote 6

When human rights organizations have questioned such narratives, BJP leaders like Mohan Bhagwat and Kailash Vijayvargiya (who has been charged with committing several rapes) argued that “rapes and gangrapes are restricted to urban India with its western culture,” where they claim women seduce males to commit such acts by wearing exposing dresses in public.Footnote 7

During the BJP regime, these narratives have shaped the nationwide understanding of gender and sexual perspectives. Many school curriculums in India celebrate rapes and rapists in textbooks. In 2015, a class three textbook in a school in the Jodhpur district of Rajasthan was found to be appreciating rape-accused self-styled godman Asaram Bapu as a spiritual saint.Footnote 8 In 2023, a portion of the Gujarat riots that talked about the rape, murder, looting, and communal violence was erased from the National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) textbooks. NCERT defended this initiative as “syllabus rationalization” and removing “irrelevant” histories.Footnote 9

These educational practices inform the public sphere by transferring classroom teachings into workplace ethics, admission procedures, and recruitment systems. Distorted narratives become a pretext for justifying high-caste Hindu-mania and Islamophobia as moral acts of moving away from Western ideologies and reviving Hinduism as an Indigenous cultural and religious ideology.Footnote 10 An uncritical fetishism of Hinducentrism serves BJP’s narrative of de-westernization and decolonization.

3. The saffronization of Islamic history

The BJP argues that Hinduism is the only authentic religion of India and all the other religious entities are settler communities.Footnote 11 To promote a Hindu Puritan image of the country, the BJP government has selectively erased Islamic histories and heritages from the school textbooks.Footnote 12 The class 12 textbooks on history and political sciences have either “slashed or removed” the chapters on Mughal history, “covering the hundreds of years of Muslim rule.”Footnote 13 The erasure is justified as an act of retrieving and reinstating India’s “original” histories.

The Hindu Puritan image is connected to a fictional pre-colonial high-caste Hindu India that the BJP has successfully imagined and executed by introducing ancient Hindu texts of Vedas, Puranas, Upanishads, and Manusmriti within the mainstream public spheres. These texts are promoted in speeches and workshops organized by right-wing BJP-affiliated religious and political groups. During these events, specific contexts that serve the BJP’s right-wing Hindu nationalist propaganda are cherry-picked from these texts and presented to the audience in an all-encompassing manner. The audience, which often has not actually read these texts, banks on these events to build their ideas of traditional social, cultural, and learning practices.

Islamophobia then spreads from deleted histories to demolishing historical and religious structures and building pro-Hindu and anti-Muslim policies. Islamophobia has been successfully established by bulldozing historic buildings like a hundred-year-old mosque in Uttar Pradesh’s Barabanki district and a sixteenth-century mosque in Prayagraj cityFootnote 14 and designing anti-Muslim policies. Anti-Muslim policies are reflected through the citizenship laws (National Register for Citizens), political patronages, and open practices of bigotry.Footnote 15

Rumors function as another vital tool for the BJP to perpetuate Islamophobia across the country. At the time of the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, several fake videos were circulated about how Muslims in India were deliberately spreading coronavirus in India. The videos showed Muslim fruit sellers spit on the fruits before selling them and served food on reusable plates that had not been washed.Footnote 16

The saffronization of public knowledge has practical consequences. According to a report by Human Rights Watch, a New York-based rights group, between May 2015 and December 2018, “more than 100 beef-related attacks took place in India, in which 280 people were injured and 44 died – an overwhelming majority of them Muslims.”Footnote 17 Legal investigations have revealed that a majority of the convicts are firm advocates of the Hindutva ideology of the BJP. During the trial, they defended their violent acts as a way of protecting the sacredness of the Hindu religion.Footnote 18

4. From saffronization to sibling solidarity

The saffronization of public knowledge in India under the BJP requires urgent attention. Narendra Modi and the BJP party have won the elections for the third consecutive term. However, compared with the previous two occasions, the BJP has received fewer seats and has failed to obtain a single-party majority in the parliament, which would allow other political parties to participate actively in policymaking strategies.

This result shows how, amidst severe censorship and erasures, India’s public spheres have established what Suraj Yengde calls a “sibling solidarity” to resist the intellectually fractured state of daily existence.Footnote 19 Suraj says sibling solidarity is not built “through identification as sameness, but rather through a feeling of relation/relatedness with other.”Footnote 20 The social solidarities (rise in Hindu–Muslim companionships), cultural solidarities (Ambedkarite movement and the promotion of the color blue as a radical political idea), and economic solidarities (rise in Hindu–Muslim commercial partnerships) display an identical approach. Much needs to be done to recover the damaged state of public spheres in India, and it begins with social, political, and radical sibling solidarities across India.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Jeffrey R. Wilson of Harvard University, Harvard, MA, USA, and Dr. Zoe Hope Bulaitis of Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK, for thoroughly supporting the article idea and guiding to write this article.

Author contribution

Writing – original draft: S.D.

Financial support

This research did not receive any funding from any public, commercial, or not-for-profit funding agency.

Competing interest

The author declares none.

Footnotes

1 Kohn Reference Kohn2013, 7.

4 Kinnvall Reference Kinnvall2019, 283.

5 N. M. and Kuruvilla Reference N. M. and Kuruvilla2022.

7 Das Reference Das2023; India Today Online 2013.

8 Press Trust of India 2015.

9 PTI 2023.

14 Explainer 2024.

15 Human Rights Watch 2021.

16 Regan, Sur, and Sud Reference Regan, Sur and Sud2020.

20 Yengde Reference Yengde2023, 23.

References

Babar, Sabina. 2024. “Hindu and Hindutva Ideology in Indian Polity: Examining Modi’s Administration.” Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad, July 10. https://issi.org.pk/hindu-and-hindutva-ideology-in-indian-polity-examining-modis-administration/.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, Kavita. 2024. “What Draws People to India’s Fake ‘Godmen’?” The Diplomat, July 8. https://thediplomat.com/2024/07/what-draws-people-to-indias-fake-godmen/.Google Scholar
Das, Awstika. 2023. “Supreme Court Sets Aside Magistrate’s Order Directing Police Investigation into Allegation of Rape against BJP Leader Kailash Vijayvargiya. Live Law, May 4. https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-sc-magistrate-police-investigation-allegation-rape-bharatiya-janata-party-bjp-leader-kailash-vijayvargiya-227912.Google Scholar
Dey, Sayan. 2022. Green Academia: Towards Eco-Friendly Education Systems. New Delhi: Routledge India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, Sayan. 2023. Performing Memories and Weaving Archives: Creolized Cultures across the Indian Ocean. London and New Delhi: Anthem Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2021. “India: Government Policies, Actions Target Minorities.” Human Rights Watch, February 19. https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/02/19/india-government-policies-actions-target-minorities.Google Scholar
India Today Online. 2013. “Rape Happens in India, and Not Bharat: RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat Blames Western Culture for Gangrapes. India Today, January 28. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/rapes-happen-in-india-not-bharat-rss-chief-mohan-bhagwat-blames-western-culture-for-gangrapes-150752-2013-01-03.Google Scholar
Kaur, Anumita. 2023. “New Indian Textbooks Purged of Nation’s Muslim History.” The Washington Post, April 6. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/04/06/india-textbooks-muslim-history-changes/.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2019. “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian Politics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32, no. 3 (Spring): 283302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Abhimanyu. 2017. “The Lynching That Changed India.” Al Jazeera, October 5. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/10/5/the-lynching-that-changed-india.Google Scholar
Lalwani, Vijayta. 2024. “How the Modi Government Is Trying to Silence Critics in the Diaspora by Banning Them from India.” A14, February 12. https://article-14.com/post/how-the-modi-govt-is-trying-to-silence-critics-in-the-diaspora-by-banning-them-from-india-65c98c934673f.Google Scholar
N. M., Naseera, and Kuruvilla, Moly. 2022. “The Sexual Politics of the Manusmriti: A Critical Analysis with Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights Perspectives.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 23, no. 6 (Spring): 2137.Google Scholar
Press Trust of India. 2015. “Rape-Accused Asaram Called a ‘Saint’ in Rajasthan School Textbook.” NDTV, August 2. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/self-styled-godman-asaram-shown-as-saint-in-rajasthan-school-book-1203025.Google Scholar
PTI. 2023.“NCERT Textbook Row: Reference to Gujarat Riots Dropped from Class 11 Sociology Book.” The Print, April 5. https://theprint.in/india/ncert-textbook-row-reference-to-gujarat-riots-dropped-from-class-11-sociology-book/1499555/.Google Scholar
Raina, Badri. 2023. “Caste Is the Achilles Heel of Hindutva Politics.” The Wire, February 9. https://thewire.in/politics/caste-is-the-achilles-heel-of-hindutva-politics.Google Scholar
Raj, Suhasini. 2023. “New Indian Textbooks Purged of Muslim History and Hindu Extremism.” The New York Times, April 6. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/06/world/asia/india-textbooks-changes.html.Google Scholar
Regan, Helen, Sur, Priyali, and Sud, Vedika. 2020. “India’s Muslims Feel Targeted by Rumors They’re Spreading Covid-19.” CNN, April 23. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/23/asia/india-coronavirus-muslim-targeted-intl-hnk/index.html.Google Scholar
VK, Vinod. 2023. “Why India’s Law Still Allows Men to Rape Their Wives.” The Week, January 11. https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2023/01/09/marital-rape-law-india-supreme-court.html.Google Scholar
Yengde, Suraj. 2023. “Dalit in Black America: Race, Caste, and the Making of Dalit-Black Archives.” Public Culture 35, no. 1 (Fall): 2141. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-10202374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar