Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:34:05.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Scoping Review of the Essential Components of Emergency Medical Response Systems for Mass Casualty Incidents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2023

Agnes Usoro*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Amber Mehmood
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Public Health, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, USA
Sarah Rapaport
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Angelica K. Ezeigwe
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Adebisi Adeyeye
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Lagos College of Medicine, Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria
Oluwafunmilayo Akinlade
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Jennifer Dias
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Daniel J. Barnett
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Edbert B. Hsu
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
Craig Tower
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
Junaid Razzak
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Agnes Usoro, Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Emergency medical (EM) response systems require extensive coordination, particularly during mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The recognition of preparedness gaps and contextual priorities to MCI response capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) can be better understood through the components of EM reponse systems. This study aims to delineate essential components and provide a framework for effective emergency medical response to MCIs.

Methods:

A scoping review was conducted using 4 databases. Title and abstract screening was followed by full-text review. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes pertaining to the essential components and integration of EM response systems.

Results:

Of 20,456 screened citations, 181 articles were included in the analysis. Seven major and 40 sub-themes emerged from the content analysis as the essential components and supportive elements of MCI medical response. The essential components of MCI response were integrated into a framework demonstrating interrelated connections between essential and supportive elements.

Conclusions:

Definitions of essential components of EM response to MCIs vary considerably. Most literature pertaining to MCI response originates from high income countries with far fewer reports from LMICs. Integration of essential components is needed in different geopolitical and economic contexts to ensure an effective MCI emergency medical response.

Type
Systematic Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc.

Disasters are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as disruptions to a community that exceed its capacity to adjust. 1 Mass casualty incidents (MCIs), also referred to as major incidents in some context, are disasters in which the number and severity of casualties overwhelm the abilities of the local health-care system. 1Reference Ahmad3 The heterogeneity of MCIs ranges from natural hazards to manmade events such as infrastructure failures, terrorism, and civil disorder, among many others. Reference Lomaglio, Ansaloni and Catena4 MCIs can result from abrupt events, such as in the case of a gas leak explosion, or occur over a more protracted course, when patients arrive more gradually over the course of several hours or even days. Both situations may lead to overwhelmed emergency medical response systems. Reference De Silva and Kawasaki5

The ever-present threat of MCIs has led to the global prioritization of disaster risk reduction (DRR), especially as urbanization has increased globally. Reference Abdul6 Densely populated cities are at increased risk of MCIs tied to environmental, socioeconomic, and security factors. The United Nations’ Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) has urged the development and implementation of transdisciplinary, multi-hazard system-based approaches toward addressing MCIs in metropolitan areas, given the complex and dynamic nature of urban risk, coupled with unplanned population growth in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Reference Valdes and Purcell7Reference Aitsi-Selmi, Egawa and Sasaki9 Critical to the implementation of these recommendations is the capacity of regional emergency medical response systems, which are responsible for delivering life-saving medical care during any MCI. 10 Emergency medical response systems tend to be complex, requiring coordination between community members, health-care service providers, government agencies, media, and law enforcement, integrating different domains. Reference Smiley, Loboda and Starling11,Reference Lee, Booth and Challen12 Furthermore, response systems in LMICs, which are typically less centralized, make assessment of the system as a whole especially difficult. Understanding components of emergency medical response systems based upon measures of effectiveness is necessary to assess preparedness for MCIs. Accordingly, the study team sought to answer the question: What are the essential components of an emergency medical response system in the immediate aftermath of an MCI?

Methods

As a guiding strategy, we focused on manmade MCIs, excluding events that did not leave an intact health system, given the disproportionately increasing number of manmade MCIs in LMICs. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh1315

Search Strategy and Databases

A search strategy for peer-reviewed sources was developed in collaboration with a university informationist and modified for different databases. English language articles highlighting emergency response components, and relevant assessments, were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase, Global Health, and Scopus spanning a 20-year period from 2000 to 2020. Combinations of search terms, including medical subject headings and keywords, were organized in 3 groups: (1) mass casualty and emergency disasters; (2) response, preparedness, and planning; (3) instruments, measurements, evaluations, and assessments. Human subjects, year, and language restrictions were applied. The detailed search strategy adapted for each electronic database are included in the Supplementary Text S1. The “similar articles” section of the PubMed website and reference lists of the identified articles were also examined to capture other potentially relevant articles. All references were exported to Covidence (Melbourne, Australia) and duplicate studies were excluded. 16 This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Diagram.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Articles included in this review encompassed peer-reviewed English language studies, guidelines, tools, and instruments focused on outlining essential components and measures for evaluation of MCI response at the prehospital, hospital, city, and national levels. The inclusion criteria for citations were intentionally broad, capturing scientific publications, committee reports, evaluations, tools, organizational and governmental guidelines, and emergency preparedness plans and exercises. For the purposes of this review, MCIs that compromised the structural integrity of an emergency medical system or disrupted the ability to deliver emergency care through workforce attrition were not considered. Accordingly, large-scale public health emergencies, infectious outbreaks, and complex protracted humanitarian emergencies were excluded. Articles without full text available in English language were excluded from further analysis. Criteria of eligible studies are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Data Abstraction

Seven team members (A.U., A.M., S.R., A.E., A.A., O.A., and J.D.) independently screened the titles and abstracts of all retrieved studies to identify the relevant studies according to the eligibility criteria, with each title and abstract screened by 2 separate reviewers. Conflicts were resolved by consensus among the reviewers during weekly research meetings, while remaining unsettled votes were arbitrated by the lead author (A.U.). After title and abstract screening, the studies underwent full-text review by the same independent reviewers. Studies were evaluated by the type of study, location, year of publication, key response components addressed, and methods of evaluation. Data extraction was performed using a data extraction sheet developed by 2 team members (A.U., A.M.). Included articles were organized by authors’ name and year of publication with an indication of whether the article outlined response activities from a high-income country (HIC) or LMIC. The World Bank classification of countries by income was used to define low-income, lower middle-income, and middle-income countries; this classification is based on gross national income (GNI) per capita. 17

Data Analysis

Thematic analysis was performed by 2 team members (AU and AM) using traditional content analysis to evaluate the full text of each included article. Reference Hsieh and Shannon18 Emerging themes pertaining to the essential components and evaluation of emergency medical response systems were included. Domains or components of emergency medical responses most frequently mentioned and discussed within the included studies were designated as essential. Included studies were characterized according to the essential components explored (Supplementary Table S2), with quality assessment of the articles conducted with guidance from the Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Reviews. Reference Eden, Levit and Berg19

Results

Of 20,456 screened citations, 181 articles were included in the qualitative analyses (Figure 1). A large number of studies were observational and approximately a third of all articles included reports and resource documents as shown in Table 2. Most of the included studies, 165 of the 181, were in HIC contexts (Figure 2). Seven major themes emerged from the content analysis as essential domains of an emergency medical response system: (1) communication; (2) safety and security; (3) human resources; (4) planning, policy, and procedures; (5) command, control, and coordination of the disaster response; (6) care delivery; and (7) health finance for disaster planning and response. Additionally, 40 sub-themes were found to support the essential components of an MCI response as shown in Table 3. A large number of publications focused on care delivery (67%), leadership and coordination (30%), communications (23%), and human resources (19%). Safety and security, as well as planning, policy, and procedures to execute response and assist recovery were also important domains identified in the literature. Each identified essential component and subcomponent of an emergency medical response system is italicized.

Table 2. Study design of included articles (n = 181)

Figure 2. Comparison of included studies from HICs versus LMICs.

Table 3. Essential components and sub-components of an emergency medical response

What Are the Essential Components of an Emergency Medical Response System in the Immediate Aftermath of an MCI?

Communication

Communication is an indispensable component of a coordinated MCI response. Effective communication during an MCI requires using modern communication devices with adequate backup, or redundant systems (eg, radio, satellites, geographic positioning systems), or other innovative technology to enable real-time situational awareness and information sharing. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62 The evolving role of social media such as live Twitter feeds, Facebook updates, text messages, and chat rooms has been explored for their ability to contribute to situational awareness, communication with the victims and their loved ones, and information sharing among the media, key stakeholders, and frontline providers. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Aten, Leavell and Gonzalez24,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Bradt31,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference Callaway, Peabody and Hoffman35,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39Reference Giacobe and Soule42,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Kearns, Skarote and Peterson51,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59Reference Wurmb, Schorscher and Justice61,Reference Farmer, Stoerger and Vyavahare63Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66 Pre-determined contacts for designated personnel, collaborating entities and other agencies, improves efficiency and the flow of information. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Homier, Hamad and Larocque48,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74 Standard and ad-hoc channels of communication help provide situational awareness, clarify misinformation, address concerns, and facilitate response activities. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Balasegaram, Kar-Purkayastha and Bussell25,Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gotham, Sottolano and Hennessy44Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Wild, Maher and Frazee60,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74Reference Currie and Heslop77

Safety and Security

Safety and security must always be prioritized with any MCI, recognizing that some incidents, such as terror attacks or chemical hazards, require containment and pose a greater security threat than others. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Currie and Heslop77Reference Weyand, Junck and Kang92 Moreover, security officials maintain the law and order at the scene and at the hospitals receiving injured patients, controlling access points, and restricting it to only authorized personnel, monitoring for suspicious activities, and preventing crowds from interfering with emergency operations. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference Bukowski34,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Autrey, Hick and Bramer81,Reference Golabek-Goldman87,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91Reference Seaton, Maier and Sachdeva94 Deploying a safety officer to identify potential threats and implement appropriate safety procedures is essential in virtually all MCIs. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Holgersson47,Reference O’Neill56,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Autrey, Hick and Bramer81,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93 In response to the safety and security challenges adopted in some settings is the introduction of Tactical medicine, in which out-of-hospital care is provided by specially trained practitioners, many with military and/or law enforcement training, who operate in hostile environments. Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Autrey, Hick and Bramer81,Reference Golabek-Goldman87,Reference Jacobs95Reference Madzimbamuto97

Human Resources

MCI response depends upon adequate and appropriate personnel capacity. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Bradt31,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Autrey, Hick and Bramer81,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104 Human resources are not limited to paramedics, nurses and doctors, but include all who care for patients during an MCI, such as uninjured or mildly injured survivors, bystanders and community volunteers. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Baldwin and Wilson68,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Ching and Preparation106 Depending upon the extent, location and duration of an MCI, fire, rescue and security services, incident management teams, ambulance and transport crew, hospital ancillary staff, translators, information technology (IT) specialists and engineers, as well as social services—who can assist with emotional trauma and maintain a family information center—should remain engaged and involved in providing acute care. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Einav, Schecter and Matot38,Reference Ghanchi41,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Baldwin and Wilson68,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Autrey, Hick and Bramer81,Reference Baker82,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107Reference Deelen, Costermans and Moss113 Some experts outlined core competencies for frontline responders participating in an MCI response. Reference Bloch, Schwartz and Pinkert30,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference Savoia, Biddinger and Burstein58,Reference Bulson, Bulson and Vande Guchte84,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107,Reference Ablah, Molgaard and Fredrickson114Reference Veenema and Toke125 Enabling factors that enhance core competencies include specific training on the incident command system framework, as well as collaborative exercises and drills to better organize a multidisciplinary and multi-agency response. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Alexander22,Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Bernardo and Veenema26Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Gotham, Sottolano and Hennessy44,Reference Hardy, Fattah and Wisborg45,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference O’Neill56,Reference Savoia, Biddinger and Burstein58,Reference Wild, Maher and Frazee60,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Friedman, Rose and Koskan76,Reference Allen, Parrillo and Will80,Reference Baker82Reference Bulson, Bulson and Vande Guchte84,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107,Reference Abraham108,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Deelen, Costermans and Moss113,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Gebbie, Peterson and Subbarao121,Reference Seifman, Ek and Menezes124,Reference Janati, Sadeghi-Bazargani and Hasanpoor126,Reference Jenkins, McCarthy and Sauer127 Cultural competency must be kept in mind when responding to any MCI, but especially those predominantly affecting minority populations, children, elderly, low-income, and alternatively abled persons. Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Gomez, Haas and Ahmed43,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Friedman, Rose and Koskan76,Reference Allen, Parrillo and Will80,Reference Bulson, Bulson and Vande Guchte84,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Abraham108,Reference Andrulis, Siddiqui and Gantner109 Advance contingency agreements between different organizations, institutions, and jurisdictions for resource and personnel sharing can help in recruiting individuals to deal with a large influx of victims over a short period of time. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Gomez, Haas and Ahmed43,Reference Gotham, Sottolano and Hennessy44,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Kearns, Skarote and Peterson51,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Golabek-Goldman87,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101,Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Avitzour, Libergal and Assaf128Reference Shartar, Moore and Wood130 Keeping an active roster of available volunteers and required staff is often useful in rapidly building surge capacity by ensuring that personnel are both prepared and willing to participate in MCI response activities. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Ghanchi41,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Homier, Hamad and Larocque48,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Baldwin and Wilson68Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101,Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104,Reference Adams and Melius115,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120 Addressing the emotional trauma of the volunteers and staff in the aftermath of an MCI should be considered during an emergency medical response. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Ghanchi41,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Baldwin and Wilson68,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Chang, Vacanti and Michaud119,Reference Gebbie, Peterson and Subbarao121,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Biddison, Berkowitz and Courtney131

Planning, Policy, and Procedures

Local planning, policies, and procedures, or a collective MCI plan, provides the framework to activate and deactivate MCI response and guide response activities. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Alexander22,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Savoia, Biddinger and Burstein58,Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Farmer and Carlton71,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Baker82,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93,Reference Seaton, Maier and Sachdeva94,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Al-Shamsi, Moitinho de Almeida and Nyanchoka132Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134 Following local standard operating procedures (SOP) and predetermined policies and protocols, next steps include clear role identification, delegation of responsibilities, record-keeping, patient triage, clinical care delivery, resource allocation, maintaining stockpiles of essential equipment and supplies, information flow, victim identification, and routine communication with staff, media and families. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Bukowski34,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Savoia, Biddinger and Burstein58,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Farmer and Carlton71,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Baker82,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93,Reference Seaton, Maier and Sachdeva94,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Biddison, Berkowitz and Courtney131Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134 When additional health-care personnel are needed, emergency credentialing could be used to facilitate the process, and providing hazard pay and benefits for first responders should be taken into consideration, including provisions providing legal indemnification to providers, support staff, institutions, and other responding agencies. Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Baldwin and Wilson68,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Gebbie, Peterson and Subbarao121,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Janati, Sadeghi-Bazargani and Hasanpoor126,Reference Shartar, Moore and Wood130,Reference Biddison, Berkowitz and Courtney131,Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou133,135Reference Tami, Bruria and Fabiana137 Vendor agreements and inventory management policies may shorten the time to deploy essential materials and equipment to ensure their availability. Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Gomez, Haas and Ahmed43,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Kearns, Skarote and Peterson51,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Baker82,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Collignon111,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Shahrestanaki, Khankeh and Masoumi129,Reference Rebmann, McPhee and Osborne136,Reference Adini, Aharonson-Daniel and Israeli138Reference Rubinson, Hick and Hanfling140 A post-MCI debriefing should be conducted during which participating organizations report their data and respond to questions fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and community practice. Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39Reference Ghanchi41,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Baker82,Reference Madzimbamuto97,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Deelen, Costermans and Moss113,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Tami, Bruria and Fabiana137,Reference Brunner, Rocha and Chudgar141Reference Hendrickx, D’Hoker and Michiels143 Periodic assessments of MCI response capabilities and the evaluation of training and preparedness of the responders should be incorporated into the process of ensuring readiness to respond to future MCIs. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Alexander22,Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference Hardy, Fattah and Wisborg45,Reference O’Neill56,Reference Rimstad and Braut57,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Farmer, Stoerger and Vyavahare63,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Faccincani, Della Corte and Sesana70,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Currie and Heslop77,Reference Allen, Parrillo and Will80Reference Baker82,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Seifman, Ek and Menezes124,Reference Janati, Sadeghi-Bazargani and Hasanpoor126,Reference Shahrestanaki, Khankeh and Masoumi129,Reference Esbitt139,Reference Hendrickx, D’Hoker and Michiels143Reference Thomas, Hsu and Kim149

Command, Control, and Coordination

A central body or lead agency maintains hierarchy, inter-agency response coordination, and mobilizes resources. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Alexander22,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Bradt31,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference Hardy, Fattah and Wisborg45,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55Reference Savoia, Biddinger and Burstein58,Reference Wurmb, Schorscher and Justice61,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Ganz, Schafer and Yang64Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Baker82,Reference Gryth, Rådestad and Nilsson88,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Chang, Vacanti and Michaud119,Reference Shahrestanaki, Khankeh and Masoumi129,135,Reference Adini, Aharonson-Daniel and Israeli138,Reference Cone142,Reference Bacis145,Reference Thomas, Hsu and Kim149Reference Xu and Li155 At the local level, a physical emergency operations center (EOC) with well-defined jurisdictional responsibility is mandated for MCI management. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Alexander22,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Bradt31,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Wurmb, Schorscher and Justice61,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Ganz, Schafer and Yang64Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Baker82,Reference Gryth, Rådestad and Nilsson88,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Collignon111,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Chang, Vacanti and Michaud119,Reference Shahrestanaki, Khankeh and Masoumi129,135,Reference Cone142,Reference Bacis145,Reference Thomas, Hsu and Kim149,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151Reference Shah, Rehman and Sayyed158 EOCs play an important role by coordinating amongst organizations that need medical resources with those that can provide medical resources and delegating various emergent tasks among different entities. Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151,Reference Comfort, Dunn and Johnson152,Reference Xu and Li155,Reference Fletcher, Knight and Pockrus157,Reference Abbasi and Kapucu159,Reference Christian, Sprung and King160 EOCs follow the framework of a centralized and hierarchical incident command system (ICS) in directing all response activities. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Alexander22,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference O’Neill56Reference Stander, Wallis and Smith59,Reference Wurmb, Schorscher and Justice61,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Ganz, Schafer and Yang64Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Baker82,Reference Gryth, Rådestad and Nilsson88,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Chang, Vacanti and Michaud119,Reference Shahrestanaki, Khankeh and Masoumi129,135,Reference Cone142,Reference Thomas, Hsu and Kim149,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151Reference Xu and Li155,Reference Fletcher, Knight and Pockrus157,Reference Shah, Rehman and Sayyed158,Reference Hoffner, Keck and Hemphill161Reference Zane and Prestipino163 Based on the extent and duration of the MCI, the ICS system can be lean or more expansive, requiring additional command and support roles to facilitate the operations of care delivery for at least 10 days without external assistance. Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Gomez, Haas and Ahmed43,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Rubinson, Hick and Hanfling140,Reference Cone142,Reference Bacis145,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151Reference Filmer and Ranse153,Reference Zane and Prestipino163,Reference Kearns, Marcozzi and Barry164 Incident command should be established at the scene of the MCI, within each responding agency, as well as at each health facility that receives victims, and should include clinical and nonclinical representatives to ensure a multidisciplinary approach to disaster management. Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Bradt31,Reference Bukowski34,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Rimstad and Braut57,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Avitzour, Libergal and Assaf128Reference Shartar, Moore and Wood130,Reference Hendrickx, D’Hoker and Michiels143,Reference Assa, Landau and Barenboim150,Reference Comfort, Dunn and Johnson152,Reference Filmer and Ranse153,Reference Fletcher, Knight and Pockrus157,Reference Shah, Rehman and Sayyed158,Reference Hoffner, Keck and Hemphill161Reference Zane and Prestipino163,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo165

Care Delivery

Care delivery is an umbrella term that covers a variety of operational and logistical activities. Approximately two-thirds of the articles, or 67%, covered clinical medical response for MCIs in the pre-hospital and hospital setting, discussing rational use of resources, triage, decontamination, surge capacity, stockpiles of medical supplies and equipment, bottlenecks in providing critical services, care of pediatric patients and other special populations, specialized management of burn injuries, and the unique considerations of chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN)-related MCIs.

The operational components of pre-hospital MCI care delivery include evacuation, triage, and safe transport of the victims. Reference Rimstad and Braut57,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134,Reference Lowe154 Several different triage methodologies have been used and tested in disasters, such as the START, JumpSTART, SALT, or SORT algorithms, among others, which quickly prioritize victims and assist in casualty distribution and setting up treatment areas where patients can be separated into cohorts based on triage categories. Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Bloch, Schwartz and Pinkert30,Reference Bradt31,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Hardy, Fattah and Wisborg45Reference Holgersson47,Reference Knotts, Etengoff and Barber52,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Wild, Maher and Frazee60,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Burke, Iverson and Goodhue99,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107,Reference Abraham108,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Catlett, Jenkins and Millin118,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Jenkins, McCarthy and Sauer127,Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134,Reference Bacis145,Reference Roccaforte and Cushman148,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151,Reference Lowe154,Reference Christian, Sprung and King160,Reference Adini, Cohen and Glassberg166Reference Silvestri, Field and Mangalat184 However, triage is a dynamic process, and patients may need to be reevaluated and reassigned to a different category. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53,Reference Wild, Maher and Frazee60Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Ganz, Schafer and Yang64,Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Jacobs95,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Jenkins, McCarthy and Sauer127,Reference Avitzour, Libergal and Assaf128,Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou133,Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134,Reference Ashkenazi, Olsha and Schecter144,Reference Bond, Subbarao and Kimmel146,Reference Roccaforte and Cushman148,Reference Assa, Landau and Barenboim150,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151,Reference Lowe154,Reference Christian, Sprung and King160,Reference Adini, Cohen and Glassberg166,Reference Challen and Walter168Reference Field and Norton174,Reference Gebhart and Pence176Reference Hirshberg, Frykberg and Mattox189 In such instances, emphasis is placed upon directing scarce resources to those who have the best chance of survival. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Baker82,Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101,Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Abraham108,Reference Cordner and Ellingham112,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Biddison, Berkowitz and Courtney131,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151,Reference Christian, Sprung and King160,Reference Field and Norton174,Reference Hirshberg, Holcomb and Mattox180,Reference Hogan and Brown181,Reference Castle187 When determining appropriate and timely patient distribution, the distance to the nearest facility, type of injuries sustained, special patient needs (eg, pediatrics, burns), and the capabilities of the receiving hospital should be considered, as well as an emphasis of managing families as best as possible. Reference Adini, Bodas and Nilsson21,Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Bloch, Schwartz and Pinkert30,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Cha, Kim and Kim36,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Leahy, Yurt and Lazar53Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Wild, Maher and Frazee60,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Jacobs95,Reference Brandenburg and Arneson98,Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Collignon111,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Joho, Lozano and Pagella123,Reference Seifman, Ek and Menezes124,Reference Avitzour, Libergal and Assaf128,Reference Al-Shamsi, Moitinho de Almeida and Nyanchoka132,Reference Zoraster, Chidester and Koenig134,Reference Adini, Aharonson-Daniel and Israeli138,Reference Hendrickx, D’Hoker and Michiels143Reference Bacis145,Reference Branas, Sing and Perron147,Reference Assa, Landau and Barenboim150,Reference Lowe154,Reference Kearns, Marcozzi and Barry164,Reference Adini, Cohen and Glassberg166,Reference Cryer, Hiatt and Eckstein173,Reference Castle187,Reference Conlon and Martin188,Reference Kanter190 When indicated, mass decontamination procedures are initiated at the scene of injury and repeated or continued at a health facility. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Currie and Heslop77Reference Allen, Parrillo and Will80,Reference Baker82Reference Chilcott, Larner and Durrant86,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Hood, Fernandes-Flack and Larrañaga90,Reference Abraham108,Reference Collignon111,Reference Ashkenazi, Olsha and Schecter144,Reference Bacis145,Reference Lowe154,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo165,Reference Burgess, Kovalchick and Harter191

Hospital response must integrate vertical and horizontal response capabilities, tiered surge capacity (conventional, contingency, crisis), maintenance of supply chain, personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, secondary patient transfers, and the handling of dead bodies. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Biddinger, Cadigan and Auerbach28,Reference Broeze, Falder and Rea33,Reference Crawford, Mackway-Jones and Russell37,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Gabbe, Veitch and Curtis40,Reference Holgersson47,Reference Little, Cooper and Gope54,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Albanese, Burich and Smith75,Reference Baker82,Reference Brown, Beatty and O’keefe83,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Corcoran, Niven and Reese101Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Aliyu105,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110Reference Deelen, Costermans and Moss113,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Devereaux, Christian and Dichter120,Reference Zhong, Clark and Hou133,Reference Rebmann, McPhee and Osborne136,Reference Esbitt139Reference Brunner, Rocha and Chudgar141,Reference Roccaforte and Cushman148,Reference Kearns, Marcozzi and Barry164,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo165,Reference Garner175,Reference Bayram, Zuabi and Subbarao186,Reference Castle187,Reference Caramello, Camerini and Ricceri192Reference Davis, Poste and Hicks194 In-hospital clinical care can be facilitated by unidirectional patient flow, keeping triage cohorts together, implementing a disaster patient tracking system, pre-positioning pre-stocked medicines and supplies with adjacent quick-reference or action cards, directing skilled staff to pre-allocated areas to provide care, delegating unskilled volunteers to perform menial tasks (transportation of patients, blood, equipment), enacting an early discharge pathway for non-critically ill patients present within the ED and/or hospital, and using a mobile health-based data entry system. Reference Nekoie-Moghadam, Kurland and Moosazadeh13,Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Einav, Schecter and Matot38,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Hsu, Jenckes and Catlett49,Reference Juffermans and Bierens50,Reference Knotts, Etengoff and Barber52Reference O’Neill56,Reference Zafar, Jawad and Shamim62,Reference Wachira, Abdalla and Wallis66,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Jenckes, Catlett and Hsu73,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Baker82,Reference Liebergall, Braverman and Shapira93,Reference Seaton, Maier and Sachdeva94,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Abraham108,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Cordner and Ellingham112,Reference Carley, Mackway-Jones and Randic117,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Al-Shamsi, Moitinho de Almeida and Nyanchoka132,Reference Brunner, Rocha and Chudgar141,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151,Reference Feizolahzadeh, Vaezi and Taheriniya156,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo165,Reference Garner175,Reference Ashkenazi, Kessel and Olsha185,Reference Bayram, Zuabi and Subbarao186,Reference Caramello, Camerini and Ricceri192,Reference Dann, Bonstein and Arbov193,Reference Haverkort, Bouman and Wind195Reference Soffer, Klausner and Bar-Zohar197 Radiology services, primarily x-ray, and CT scans, are relevant diagnostic modalities in traumatic injuries and guide management decisions, particularly with the assumption that 50% of injured patients will require operative management. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Lynn, Gurr and Memon74,Reference Avitzour, Libergal and Assaf128,Reference Ashkenazi, Kessel and Olsha185,Reference Bookman and Zane198 However, radiology has been recognized as a bottleneck for patient care. Reference Bloch, Schwartz and Pinkert30,Reference Kearns, Skarote and Peterson51,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Brunner, Rocha and Chudgar141,Reference Bookman and Zane198 Lean strategies are recommended, such as limiting radiologic capabilities to only high priority patients, using bedside ultrasound to facilitate rapid identification of operative pathology, stationing a radiologist with the radiology tech in the patient care area to aid in prompt diagnosis, and facilitating paper-charting or use of a simplified computerized electronic order entry to order a diagnostic study. Reference Almogy and Rivkind23,Reference Bernardo and Veenema26,Reference Bloch, Schwartz and Pinkert30,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference El Sayed, Chami and Hitti39,Reference Hick, Koenig and Barbisch46,Reference Kearns, Skarote and Peterson51,Reference Avidan, Hersch and Spira67,Reference Berger, Körner and Bernstein69,Reference Baker82,Reference Brooke Lerner, O’Connor and Schwartz91,Reference Halpern, Tsai and Arnold102,Reference Hick, Hanfling and Cantrill103,Reference Veenema and Toke125,Reference Biddison, Berkowitz and Courtney131,Reference Brunner, Rocha and Chudgar141,Reference Bookman and Zane198

Health Finance

Seven of the included articles directly addressed the financing of MCI response. Financial resources, largely determined by the fiscal budget of the city government, determine the extent at which MCI response activities can be operationalized in an effective and timely manner. Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Biddinger, Reisman and Seger29,Reference Gotham, Sottolano and Hennessy44,Reference Golabek-Goldman87,Reference Higgins, Wainright and Lu89,Reference Jacobs and Burns96,Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104,Reference Seifman, Ek and Menezes124,Reference Janati, Sadeghi-Bazargani and Hasanpoor126,Reference Shartar, Moore and Wood130,Reference Al-Shamsi, Moitinho de Almeida and Nyanchoka132,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo151 Recognizing that there are many competing priorities for municipal funds, local government officials should perform annual hazard analyses to allocate resources corresponding to level of risk. Reference Adelaine, Shoaf and Harvey20,Reference Biddinger, Baggish and Harrington27,Reference Brands, Hernandez and Stenberg32,Reference Gotham, Sottolano and Hennessy44,Reference Moser, Connelly and Baker55,Reference Chim, Yew and Song100,Reference Smith, Paturas and Tomassoni104,Reference Cocco and Thomas-Boaz110,Reference Seifman, Ek and Menezes124,Reference Janati, Sadeghi-Bazargani and Hasanpoor126,Reference Shartar, Moore and Wood130,Reference Al-Shamsi, Moitinho de Almeida and Nyanchoka132,Reference Hendrickx, D’Hoker and Michiels143,Reference Branas, Sing and Perron147,Reference Born, Briggs and Ciraulo165

Discussion

With the premise that an effective and timely response saves lives, the immediate aftermath of an MCI deserves special attention. An effective MCI response minimizes chaos, misinformation, and delays in care. However, defining effectiveness is met with considerable variability. Here, we sought to characterize the essential domains and components of an emergency medical response, specifically pertaining to MCIs. The observed heterogeneity and complexity of emergency medical response system components during an MCI are by and large a function of the scope of the event on the affected population. System-level tools and assessments exist to improve disaster readiness but fall short of comprehensively capturing crucial activities in an MCI emergency medical response framework. 1,Reference Rentschler199203 The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Emergency Response Framework (ERF) is geared toward emergencies with public health consequences that are outside of the definition of this study’s defined MCI (eg, natural disasters, bioterrorism events, or pandemics) and limits its framework to the activities of the WHO. 201 Other frameworks such as the mass casualty management systems framework summarize comprehensive strategies and guidelines for building health sector capacity at the national level, provincial/state level, community and local government level, and health-care facility level. 203 Using the thematic analysis in this study, an Integrated Framework of MCI Response with the essential domains and components is presented in Figure 3. The framework highlights the connections and interrelatedness of different components, which is sometimes overlooked when studying one aspect of the MCI response. It is, therefore, imperative to remember how each of these component influences and shapes the other.

Figure 3. Integrated framework of MCI response.

Best practices pertaining to MCI response commonly emerge from real-world contexts and are often anecdotal. Real-world experience could better inform practices through more systematic collation and rigorous analysis. Few studies based on experimental design pertaining to MCI response were found in this review, likely attributable to the largely unpredictable nature of MCIs. Another notable observation was the predominant focus of literature on process outcomes, such as early MCI activation, EMS response time, shortened transit from scene to facility time, early injury identification, and efficient injury management. In contrast, only a few included articles presented data linking process improvements to improved health outcomes. Reference Einav, Schecter and Matot38,Reference Ablah, Tinius and Konda107,Reference Feizolahzadeh, Vaezi and Taheriniya156,Reference Gebhart and Pence176,Reference Kanter190 This suggests that further research is needed to explore how health and other impact outcomes are affected by improvements in process indicators.

Furthermore, despite LMICs carrying the global burden of death and disability from MCIs, evidence concerning emergency response from these settings remain sparse. 204 The majority of the studies in this review are from high-income countries, potentially limiting generalizability to LMICs. The essential domains and components of an organized approach to MCIs can be adapted to LMICs but is not representative of the unique challenges facing low-resourced environments and, therefore, should be applied with caution. For instance, very limited information is available on the key responders representing institutions not typically involved in response in HICs. Additionally, many identified components of the emergency medical response were found to hinge upon the preparedness of regional medical centers and the presence of health-care infrastructure capable of providing emergency care services, which often is not as developed in LMICs. Reference Murray, Elmes and Fly205,Reference Cosgrove, Jenckes and Kohri206 More research taking into consideration the perspective of MCI response in LMIC settings is warranted. The predominance of descriptive, observational, and case studies provides low-quality of evidence related to education, training, clinical care, and in some instances, policy recommendations.

Limitations

Although this review focuses on the response phase of the disaster management cycle, it is recognized that effective emergency response cannot be separated from preparedness, mitigation, and recovery. Studies pertaining to these other phases were designated as outside of the scope of this review. The selected focus of this review centered on the subset of manmade MCIs due to their increasing frequency and high relevance to understanding emergency medical response capacity and may not necessarily be applicable to other events that are subacute or of a protracted nature. As stated in our findings, the literature on MCI is largely from high-resource settings, despite a relatively higher burden in LMICs. We believe the basic characteristics of a response system would remain the same irrespective of the setting and the specific roles of the individual institutions. Finally, MCIs of catastrophic proportions that resulted in complete disruption of health systems were not examined, and accordingly, findings may have limited generalizability outside of the scope of this review.

Conclusions

This study identified significant gaps in the available evidence on emergency health system response for MCIs, with much of the literature characterized as anecdotal. Most existing literature is also from high income countries, with far less evidence from low resource, particularly LMIC, settings. We identify 7 essential domains, 40 sub-components of an emergency medical response system, and introduce an Integrated Framework of MCI Response to highlight the interconnectedness of an MCI emergency response. The framework for MCI response is limited if it is not evaluated and implemented by key stakeholders in the immediate aftermath of an MCI. Further research on emergency response capacity for MCIs tailored to the LMIC context is greatly needed.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2022.235

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of Ms. Katie Lobner, Dr. Rodney Omron, Ms. Chelsea Ducille, and Mr. Julio DeJesus for providing their technical manuscript assistance.

Author contributions

J.R. conceived and designed the study, and obtained research funding. A.U., A.M., S.R., A.E., A.A., O.A., J.D. acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. A.U., A.M., and E.H. drafted the manuscript, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. A.U., A.M., C.T., and J.R. supervised and provided final approval of the manuscript version for publication. A.U. and J.R. take responsibility for the manuscript as a whole.

Funding

Angelica K. Ezeigwe BS MPH was supported by the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) which is funded in part by Grant Number TL1 TR003100 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). Junaid Razzak MBBS PhD FACEP was supported by the Enhancing Learning and Research for Humanitarian Assistance (ELRHA) 2016 Research Grant for Health in Humanitarian Crisis (R2HC). He is also supported by the National Institutes of Health in the United States and Aga Khan University in Pakistan.

References

World Health Organization. Mass casualty management systems: strategies and guidelines for building health sector capacity. 2007. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43804 Google Scholar
DeNolf, RL, Kahwaji, CI. EMS mass casualty management. StatPearls: 2021.Google Scholar
Ahmad, S. Mass casualty incident management. Mo Med. 2018;115(5):451-455.Google ScholarPubMed
Lomaglio, L, Ansaloni, L, Catena, F, et al. Mass casualty incident: definitions and current reality. WSES Handbook of Mass Casualties Incidents Management. Springer; 2020:1-10.Google Scholar
De Silva, M, Kawasaki, A. Socioeconomic vulnerability to disaster risk: a case study of flood and drought impact in a rural Sri Lankan community. Ecol Econ. 2018;152:131-140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdul, L, Yu T-f. Resilient urbanization: a systematic review on urban discourse in Pakistan. Urban Sci. 2020;4(4):76.Google Scholar
Valdes, HM, Purcell, PH. Making cities resilient report 2012: a global snapshot of how local governments reduce disaster risk. Int J Disaster Resilience Built Environ. 2013.Google Scholar
UNDRR. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. 2015. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030 Google Scholar
Aitsi-Selmi, A, Egawa, S, Sasaki, H, et al. The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: renewing the global commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well-being. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2015;6(2):164-176.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Health emergency and disaster risk management framework. 2019. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326106 Google Scholar
Smiley, DR, Loboda, A, Starling, C, et al. Transformation from planning to operations: emergency medical services in disaster response. Ann Disaster Med. 2004;3(1):11-26.Google Scholar
Lee, ACK, Booth, A, Challen, K, et al. Disaster management in low-and middle-income countries: scoping review of the evidence base. Emerg Med J. 2014;31(e1):e78-e83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nekoie-Moghadam, M, Kurland, L, Moosazadeh, M, et al. Tools and checklists used for the evaluation of hospital disaster preparedness: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(5):781-788.Google ScholarPubMed
Hugelius, K, Becker, J, Adolfsson, A. Five challenges when managing mass casualty or disaster situations: a review study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3068.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. The International Disaster Database. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters; 2021.Google Scholar
Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia. Accessed December 2, 2022. www.covidence.org Google Scholar
Hsieh, H-F, Shannon, SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.Google ScholarPubMed
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. In: Eden, J, Levit, L, Berg, A, et al., eds. Finding what works in health care: standards for systematic reviews. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Accessed November 14, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209518/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelaine, SA, Shoaf, K, Harvey, C. An assessment of collaboration and disasters: a hospital perspective. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(2):121-125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adini, B, Bodas, M, Nilsson, H, et al. Policies for managing emergency medical services in mass casualty incidents. Injury. 2017;48(9):1878-1883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, DE. Evaluation of civil protection programmes, with a case study from Mexico. Disaster Prev Manag. 2015;24(2):263-283.Google Scholar
Almogy, G, Rivkind, AI. Surgical lessons learned from suicide bombing attacks. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(2):313-319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aten, JD, Leavell, K, Gonzalez, R, et al. Everyday technologies for extraordinary circumstances: possibilities for enhancing disaster communication. Psychol Trauma. 2011;3(1):16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balasegaram, S, Kar-Purkayastha, I, Bussell, ME, et al. How to deploy online guidance during a major incident. J Bus Contin Emerg Plan. 2011;5(3):257-266.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernardo, LM, Veenema, TG. Pediatric emergency preparedness for mass gatherings and special events. Disaster Manag Response. 2004;2(4):118-122.Google ScholarPubMed
Biddinger, PD, Baggish, A, Harrington, L, et al. Be prepared—the Boston Marathon and mass-casualty events. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):1958-1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biddinger, PD, Cadigan, RO, Auerbach, BS, et al. On linkages using exercises to identify systems-level preparedness challenges. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(1):96-101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biddinger, PD, Reisman, D, Seger, RF, et al. Current emergency preparedness resources and capabilities among academic health systems in the United States. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(5):574-577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, YH, Schwartz, D, Pinkert, M, et al. Distribution of casualties in a mass-casualty incident with three local hospitals in the periphery of a densely populated area: lessons learned from the medical management of a terrorist attack. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(3):186-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradt, DA. Site management of health issues in the 2001 World Trade Center disaster. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(6):650-660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brands, CK, Hernandez, RG, Stenberg, A, et al. Complete self-sufficiency planning: designing and building disaster-ready hospitals. South Med J. 2013;106(1):63-68.Google ScholarPubMed
Broeze, CL, Falder, S, Rea, S, et al. Burn disasters—an audit of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(6):555-579.Google ScholarPubMed
Bukowski, K. Emergency operations plan: involving security in an emergency situation. J Healthc Prot Manage. 2017;33(1):82-88.Google Scholar
Callaway, DW, Peabody, CR, Hoffman, A, et al. Disaster mobile health technology: lessons from Haiti. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(2):148-152.Google ScholarPubMed
Cha, M-i, Kim, GW, Kim, CH, et al. A study on the disaster medical response during the Mauna Ocean Resort gymnasium collapse. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2016;30(3):165-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, IW, Mackway-Jones, K, Russell, D, et al. Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents. Emerg Med J. 2004;21(1):24-28.Google ScholarPubMed
Einav, S, Schecter, WP, Matot, I, et al. Case managers in mass casualty incidents. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):496-501.Google ScholarPubMed
El Sayed, M, Chami, AF, Hitti, E. Developing a hospital disaster preparedness plan for mass casualty incidents: lessons learned from the downtown Beirut bombing. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(3):379-385.Google ScholarPubMed
Gabbe, BJ, Veitch, W, Curtis, K, et al. Survey of major trauma centre preparedness for mass casualty incidents in Australia, Canada, England and New Zealand. eClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100322.Google ScholarPubMed
Ghanchi, A. Insights into French emergency planning, response, and resilience procedures from a hospital managerial perspective following the Paris terrorist attacks of Friday, November 13, 2015. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016;10(5):789-794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacobe, NA, Soule, PJ. Social Media for the Emergency Manager in Disaster Planning and Response. The Pennsylvania State University; 2014:570-574.Google Scholar
Gomez, D, Haas, B, Ahmed, N, et al. Disaster preparedness of Canadian trauma centres: the perspective of medical directors of trauma. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):9-16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gotham, IJ, Sottolano, DL, Hennessy, ME, et al. An integrated information system for all-hazards health preparedness and response: New York State Health Emergency Response Data System. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007;13(5):486-496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, S, Fattah, S, Wisborg, T, et al. Systematic reporting to improve the emergency medical response to major incidents: a pilot study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):1-7.Google ScholarPubMed
Hick, JL, Koenig, KL, Barbisch, D, et al. Surge capacity concepts for health care facilities: the CO-S-TR model for initial incident assessment. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(S1):S51-S57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holgersson, A. Review of on-scene management of mass-casualty attacks. J Hum Secur. 2016;12(1):91-111.Google Scholar
Homier, V, Hamad, R, Larocque, J, et al. A randomized trial comparing telephone tree, text messaging, and instant messaging app for emergency department staff recall for disaster response. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):471-477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, EB, Jenckes, MW, Catlett, CL, et al. Effectiveness of hospital staff mass-casualty incident training methods: a systematic literature review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(3):191-199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juffermans, J, Bierens, JJ. Recurrent medical response problems during five recent disasters in the Netherlands. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(2):127-136.Google ScholarPubMed
Kearns, RD, Skarote, MB, Peterson, J, et al. Creating a state medical response system for medical disaster management: the North Carolina experience. South Med J. 2014;107(9):540-548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knotts, KE, Etengoff, S, Barber, K, et al. Casualty collection in mass-casualty incidents: a better method for finding proverbial needles in a haystack. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006;21(6):459-464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahy, NE, Yurt, RW, Lazar, EJ, et al. Burn disaster response planning in New York City: updated recommendations for best practices. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33(5):587-594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, M, Cooper, J, Gope, M, et al. ‘Lessons learned’: a comparative case study analysis of an emergency department response to two burns disasters. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24(4):420-429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R Jr, Connelly, C, Baker, L, et al. Development of a state medical surge plan, Part II: components of a medical surge plan. Disaster Manag Response. 2006;4(1):19-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, PA. The ABC’s of disaster response. Scand J Surg. 2005;94(4):259-266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rimstad, R, Braut, GS. Literature review on medical incident command. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(2):205-215.Google ScholarPubMed
Savoia, E, Biddinger, PD, Burstein, J, et al. Inter-agency communication and operations capabilities during a hospital functional exercise: reliability and validity of a measurement tool. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(1):52-58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stander, M, Wallis, LA, Smith, WP. Hospital disaster planning in the Western cape, South Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011;26(4):283-288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wild, J, Maher, J, Frazee, RC, et al. The Fort Hood massacre: lessons learned from a high profile mass casualty. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1709-1713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurmb, T, Schorscher, N, Justice, P, et al. Structured analysis, evaluation and report of the emergency response to a terrorist attack in Wuerzburg, Germany using a new template of standardised quality indicators. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zafar, H, Jawad, A, Shamim, MS, et al. Terrorist bombings: medical response in a developing country. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(6):561-566.Google ScholarPubMed
Farmer, B, Stoerger, L, Vyavahare, M, et al. A novel use of telemedicine during a hospital mass casualty drill. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(8):531-534.Google ScholarPubMed
Ganz, A, Schafer, JM, Yang, Z, et al. DIORAMA enhances efficiency of a mass casualty incident: system and experimentation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:2644-2647.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, BF. An analysis of US government and media disaster frames. J Commun Manag. 2009;13(3):268-283.Google Scholar
Wachira, BW, Abdalla, RO, Wallis, LA. Westgate shootings: an emergency department approach to a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(5):538-541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avidan, V, Hersch, M, Spira, RM, et al. Civilian hospital response to a mass casualty event: the role of the intensive care unit. J Trauma. 2007;62(5):1234-1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, A, Wilson, L. Allied health disaster volunteering. J Allied Health. 2008;37(4):236-241.Google ScholarPubMed
Berger, FH, Körner, M, Bernstein, MP, et al. Emergency imaging after a mass casualty incident: role of the radiology department during training for and activation of a disaster management plan. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faccincani, R, Della Corte, F, Sesana, G, et al. Hospital surge capacity during Expo 2015 in Milano, Italy. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(5):459-465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, JC, Carlton, PK Jr Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):S56-S59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grabo, D, Strumwasser, A, Remick, K, et al. A pilot registry of trauma surgeons willing and ready to respond to disasters. J Trauma. 2018;84(2):393-396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenckes, MW, Catlett, CL, Hsu, EB, et al. Development of evaluation modules for use in hospital disaster drills. Am J Disaster Med. 2007;2(2):87-95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, M, Gurr, D, Memon, A, et al. Management of conventional mass casualty incidents: ten commandments for hospital planning. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27(5):649-658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albanese, J, Burich, D, Smith, D, et al. Clinical guidelines for responding to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and trauma/burn mass casualty incidents: quick reference guides for emergency department staff. J Bus Contin Emerg Plan. 2014;8(2):122-133.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, DB, Rose, ID, Koskan, A. Pilot assessment of an experiential disaster communication curriculum. Disaster Prev Manag. 2011;20(3):238-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, J, Heslop, DJ. Operational systems evaluation of a large scale multi-agency decontamination exercise. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;31:1054-1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albores, P, Shaw, D. Responding to terrorist attacks and natural disasters: a case study using simulation. IEEE. In: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2005, Orlando FL.Google Scholar
Albores, P, Shaw, D. Government preparedness: using simulation to prepare for a terrorist attack. Comput Oper Res. 2008;35(6):1924-1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, GM, Parrillo, SJ, Will, J, et al. Principles of disaster planning for the pediatric population. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(6):537-540.Google ScholarPubMed
Autrey, AW, Hick, JL, Bramer, K, et al. 3 Echo: concept of operations for early care and evacuation of victims of mass violence. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(4):421-428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, MS. Creating order from chaos: part II: tactical planning for mass casualty and disaster response at definitive care facilities. Mil Med. 2007;172(3):237-243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, M, Beatty, J, O’keefe, S, et al. Planning for hospital emergency mass-casualty decontamination by the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Disaster Manag Response. 2004;2(3):75-80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulson, J, Bulson, TC, Vande Guchte, KS. Hospital-based special needs patient decontamination: lessons from the shower. Am J Disaster Med. 2010;5(6):353-360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilcott, RP. Managing mass casualties and decontamination. Environ Int. 2014;72:37-45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilcott, RP, Larner, J, Durrant, A, et al. Evaluation of US federal guidelines (Primary Response Incident Scene Management [PRISM]) for mass decontamination of casualties during the initial operational response to a chemical incident. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(6):671-684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golabek-Goldman, M. Adequacy of US hospital security preparedness for mass casualty incidents: critical lessons from the Israeli experience. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016;22(1):68-80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gryth, D, Rådestad, M, Nilsson, H, et al. Evaluation of medical command and control using performance indicators in a full-scale, major aircraft accident exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(2):118-123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, W, Wainright, C, Lu, N, et al. Assessing hospital preparedness using an instrument based on the Mass Casualty Disaster Plan Checklist: results of a statewide survey. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(6):327-332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, J, Fernandes-Flack, J, Larrañaga, MD. Effectiveness of hospital-based decontamination during a simulated mass casualty exposure. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011;8(12):D131-D138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooke Lerner, E, O’Connor, RE, Schwartz, R, et al. Blast-related injuries from terrorism: an international perspective. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11(2):137-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyand, JS, Junck, E, Kang, CS, et al. Security, violent events, and anticipated surge capabilities of emergency departments in Washington State. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(3):466-473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebergall, MH, Braverman, N, Shapira, SC, et al. Role of nurses in a university hospital during mass casualty events. Am J Crit Care. 2007;16(5):480-484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaton, MG, Maier, A, Sachdeva, S, et al. A framework for integrating information resources for chemical emergency management and response. Am J Disaster Med. 2019;14(1):33-49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, LM Jr Joint committee to create a national policy to enhance survivability from mass casualty shooting events: Hartford Consensus II. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):476-478e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, L, Burns, KJ. The Hartford Consensus to improve survivability in mass casualty events: process to policy. Am J Disaster Med. 2014;9(1):67-71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madzimbamuto, F. A hospital response to a soccer stadium stampede in Zimbabwe. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(6):556-559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandenburg, MA, Arneson, WL. Pediatric disaster response in developed countries: ten guiding principles. Am J Disaster Med. 2007;2(3):151-162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burke, RV, Iverson, E, Goodhue, CJ, et al. Disaster and mass casualty events in the pediatric population. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(4):265-270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chim, H, Yew, WS, Song, C. Managing burn victims of suicide bombing attacks: outcomes, lessons learnt, and changes made from three attacks in Indonesia. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):1-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corcoran, SP, Niven, AS, Reese, JM. Critical care management of major disasters: a practical guide to disaster preparation in the intensive care unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2012;27(1):3-10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, P, Tsai, M-C, Arnold, JL, et al. Mass-casualty, terrorist bombings: implications for emergency department and hospital emergency response (Part II). Prehosp Disaster Med. 2003;18(3):235-241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hick, JL, Hanfling, D, Cantrill, SV. Allocating scarce resources in disasters: emergency department principles. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(3):177-187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D, Paturas, J, Tomassoni, A, et al. Resource allocation: an approach for enhancing hospital resiliency. J Bus Contin Emerg Plan. 2011;5(2):140-149.Google ScholarPubMed
Aliyu, A. Management of disasters and complex emergencies in Africa: the challenges and constraints. Ann Afr Med. 2015;14(3):123.Google ScholarPubMed
Ching, PE, Preparation, Lazaro RT., roles, and responsibilities of Filipino occupational therapists in disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(9):1333-1340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ablah, E, Tinius, AM, Konda, K. Pediatric emergency preparedness training: are we on a path toward national dissemination? J Trauma. 2009;67(2):S152-S158.Google ScholarPubMed
Abraham, H. Preparing for pediatrics. Planning for children in disasters. JEMS. 2014;39(9):38-42.Google ScholarPubMed
Andrulis, DP, Siddiqui, NJ, Gantner, JL. Preparing racially and ethnically diverse communities for public health emergencies. Health Aff (Millwwood). 2007;26(5):1269-1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocco, C, Thomas-Boaz, W. Preparedness planning and response to a mass-casualty incident: A case study of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. J Bus Contin Emerg Plan. 2019;13(1):6-21.Google ScholarPubMed
Collignon, U. Be prepared for a major incident by careful planning. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2008;18(7):233-239.Google Scholar
Cordner, S, Ellingham, STD. Two halves make a whole: both first responders and experts are needed for the management and identification of the dead in large disasters. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;279:60-64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deelen, R, Costermans, E, Moss, R, et al. Disaster planning: the role of the transfusion practitioner. ISBT Sci Ser. 2019;14(1):98-103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ablah, E, Molgaard, CA, Fredrickson, DD, et al. Quantitative evaluation of “can it happen in Kansas: response to terrorism and emerging infections”. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005;11(6):S17-S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, LM, Melius, J. Prepared to respond? Exploring Personal disaster preparedness and nursing staff response to disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;15(5):557-562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbari, FA, Bahrami, M, Aein, F, et al. Iranian nurses’ experience of management competences in disaster response: a qualitative study. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2018;12(4):1799-1803.Google Scholar
Carley, S, Mackway-Jones, K, Randic, L, et al. Planning for major burns incidents by implementing an accelerated Delphi technique. Burns. 2002;28(5):413-418.Google ScholarPubMed
Catlett, CL, Jenkins, JL, Millin, MG. Role of emergency medical services in disaster response: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011;15(3):420-425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, BP, Vacanti, JC, Michaud, Y, et al. Emotional intelligence in the operating room: analysis from the Boston Marathon bombing. Am J Disaster Med. 2014;9(2):77-85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devereaux, A, Christian, MD, Dichter, JR, et al. Summary of suggestions from the task force for mass critical care summit, January 26–27, 2007. Chest. 2008;133(5):1S-7S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebbie, KM, Peterson, CA, Subbarao, I, et al. Adapting standards of care under extreme conditions. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(2):111-116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsu, EB, Thomas, TL, Bass, EB, et al. Healthcare worker competencies for disaster training. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6(1):1-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joho, BS, Lozano, D, Pagella, P, et al. Burn disaster-management planning: a preparedness tool kit. J Burn Care Res. 2014;35(4):e205-e216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seifman, M, Ek, EW, Menezes, H, et al. Bushfire disaster burn casualty management: the Australian “Black Saturday” bushfire experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(5):460-463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veenema, TG, Toke, J. When standards of care change in mass-casualty events. Am J Nurs. 2007;107(9):72A-72F.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janati, A, Sadeghi-Bazargani, H, Hasanpoor, E, et al. Emergency response of Iranian hospitals against disasters: a practical framework for improvement. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(2):166-171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, JL, McCarthy, ML, Sauer, LM, et al. Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):3-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avitzour, M, Libergal, M, Assaf, J, et al. A multicasualty event: out-of-hospital and in-hospital organizational aspects. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(10):1102-1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahrestanaki, YA, Khankeh, H, Masoumi, G, et al. What structural factors influencing emergency and disaster medical response teams? A comparative review study. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:110.Google ScholarPubMed
Shartar, SE, Moore, BL, Wood, LM. Developing a mass casualty surge capacity protocol for emergency medical services to use for patient distribution. South Med J. 2017;110(12):792-795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biddison, LD, Berkowitz, KA, Courtney, B, et al. Ethical considerations: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest. 2014;146(4 Suppl):e145S-e155S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Shamsi, M, Moitinho de Almeida, M, Nyanchoka, L, et al. Assessment of the capacity and capability of burn centers to respond to burn disasters in Belgium: a mixed-method study. J Burn Care Res. 2019;40(6):869-877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhong, S, Clark, M, Hou, X-Y, et al. Development of key indicators of hospital resilience: a modified Delphi study. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(2):74-82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zoraster, RM, Chidester, C, Koenig, W. Field triage and patient maldistribution in a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(3):224-229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. A systematic review of public health emergency operations centres (EOC): December 2013. 2014. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/a-systematic-review-of-public-health-emergency-operations-centres-(-eoc) Google Scholar
Rebmann, T, McPhee, K, Osborne, L, et al. Best practices for healthcare facility and regional stockpile maintenance and sustainment: a literature review. Health Secur. 2017;15(4):409-417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tami, G, Bruria, A, Fabiana, E, et al. An after-action review tool for EDs: learning from mass casualty incidents. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(5):798-802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adini, B, Aharonson-Daniel, L, Israeli, A. Load index model: an advanced tool to support decision making during mass-casualty incidents. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):622-627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esbitt, D. The Strategic National Stockpile: roles and responsibilities of health care professionals for receiving the stockpile assets. Disaster Manag Response. 2003;1(3):68-70.Google ScholarPubMed
Rubinson, L, Hick, JL, Hanfling, DG, et al. Definitive care for the critically ill during a disaster: a framework for optimizing critical care surge capacity: from a Task Force for Mass Critical Care summit meeting, January 26–27, 2007, Chicago, IL. Chest. 2008;133(5):18S-31S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunner, J, Rocha, TC, Chudgar, AA, et al. The Boston Marathon bombing: after-action review of the Brigham and Women’s Hospital emergency radiology response. Radiology. 2014;273(1):78-87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, DC. Rescue from the rubble: urban search & rescue. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4(4):352-357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendrickx, C, D’Hoker, SD, Michiels, G, et al. Principles of hospital disaster management: An integrated and multidisciplinary approach. B-ENT. 2016;12(26/2):139-148.Google Scholar
Ashkenazi, I, Olsha, O, Schecter, WP, et al. Inadequate mass-casualty knowledge base adversely affects treatment decisions by trauma care providers: survey on hospital response following a terrorist bombing. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(4):342-347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bacis, G. Hazmat Disasters-Prevention, Planning, Training. Taylor and Francis Ltd; 2010:244-245.Google Scholar
Bond, WF, Subbarao, I, Kimmel, SR, et al. Testing the use of symptom-based terrorism triage algorithms with hospital-based providers. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(3):234-241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branas, CC, Sing, RF, Perron, AD. A case series analysis of mass casualty incidents. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000;4(4):299-304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roccaforte, JD, Cushman, JG. Disaster preparedness, triage, and surge capacity for hospital definitive care areas: optimizing outcomes when demands exceed resources. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25(1):161-177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, TL, Hsu, EB, Kim, HK, et al. The incident command system in disasters: evaluation methods for a hospital-based exercise. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(1):14-23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assa, A, Landau, D-A, Barenboim, E, et al. Role of air-medical evacuation in mass-casualty incidents—a train collision experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(3):271-276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, CT, Briggs, SM, Ciraulo, DL, et al. Disasters and mass casualties: I. General principles of response and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(7):388-396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Comfort, LK, Dunn, M, Johnson, D, et al. Coordination in complex systems: increasing efficiency in disaster mitigation and response. Int J Emerg Manag. 2004;2(1-2):62-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, LB, Ranse, J. Who is my leader? A case study from a hospital disaster scenario in a less developed country. Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2013;16(4):170-174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, CG. Pediatric prehospital medicine in mass casualty incidents. J Trauma. 2009;67(2):S161-S167.Google ScholarPubMed
Xu, M, Li, S-X. Analysis of good practice of public health emergency operations centers. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8(8):677-682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feizolahzadeh, S, Vaezi, A, Taheriniya, A, et al. The feasibility of increasing hospital surge capacity in disasters through early patient discharge. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019;7(2):105-111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, B, Knight, A, Pockrus, B, et al. Hospital incident command: first responders or receiving centers? Am J Disaster Med. 2016;11(2):125-130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, AA, Rehman, A, Sayyed, RH, et al. Impact of a predefined hospital mass casualty response plan in a limited resource setting with no pre-hospital care system. Injury. 2015;46(1):156-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbasi, A, Kapucu, N. Structural dynamics of organizations during the evolution of interorganizational networks in disaster response. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag. 2012;9(1).Google Scholar
Christian, MD, Sprung, CL, King, MA, et al. Triage: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement. Chest. 2014;146(4):e61S-e74S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffner, P, Keck, B, Hemphill, R, et al. Integrating physician response into an academic medical center emergency operations response plan. J Emerg Nurs. 2009;35(4):343-347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shooshtari, S, Tofighi, S, Benefits, Abbasi S., barriers, and limitations on the use of Hospital Incident Command System. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:36. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.202146 Google ScholarPubMed
Zane, RD, Prestipino, AL. Implementing the Hospital Emergency Incident Command System: an integrated delivery system’s experience. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2004;19(4):311-317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearns, RD, Marcozzi, DE, Barry, N, et al. Disaster preparedness and response for the burn mass casualty incident in the twenty-first century. Clin Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):441-449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Born, CT, Briggs, SM, Ciraulo, DL, et al. Disasters and mass casualties: II. Explosive, biologic, chemical, and nuclear agents. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(8):461-473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adini, B, Cohen, R, Glassberg, E, et al. Reconsidering policy of casualty evacuation in a remote mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(1):91-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolduc, C, Maghraby, N, Fok, P, et al. Comparison of electronic versus manual mass-casualty incident triage. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(3):273-278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Challen, K, Walter, D. Major incident triage: comparative validation using data from 7th July bombings. Injury. 2013;44(5):629-633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claudius, I, Kaji, A, Santillanes, G, et al. Comparison of computerized patients versus live moulaged actors for a mass-casualty drill. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):438-442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claudius, I, Kaji, AH, Santillanes, G, et al. Accuracy, efficiency, and inappropriate actions using JumpSTART triage in MCI simulations. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015;30(5):457-460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, DC, Serra, J, Burns, K, et al. Pilot test of the SALT mass casualty triage system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2009;13(4):536-540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cone, DC, Serra, J, Kurland, L. Comparison of the SALT and Smart triage systems using a virtual reality simulator with paramedic students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18(6):314-321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cryer, HG, Hiatt, JR, Eckstein, M, et al. Improved trauma system multicasualty incident response: comparison of two train crash disasters. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):783-789.Google ScholarPubMed
Field, K, Norton, I. Australian triage tags: a prospective, randomised cross-over trial and evaluation of user preference. Emerg Med Australas. 2012;24(3):321-328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner, A. Documentation and tagging of casualties in multiple casualty incidents. Emerg Med. 2003;15(5-6):475-479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebhart, ME, Pence, R. START triage: does it work? Disaster Manag Response. 2007;5(3):68-73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, A, Nammour, E, Mangolds, V, et al. Intuitive versus algorithmic triage. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(4):355-361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashimoto, A, Ueda, T, Kuboyama, K, et al. Application of a first impression triage in the Japan railway west disaster. Acta Med Okayama. 2013;67(3):171-176.Google ScholarPubMed
Heller, AR, Salvador, N, Frank, M, et al. Diagnostic precision of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents. English version. Anaesthesist. 2019;68(Suppl 1):15-24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirshberg, A, Holcomb, JB, Mattox, KL. Hospital trauma care in multiple-casualty incidents: a critical view. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(6):647-652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, DE, Brown, T. Utility of vital signs in mass casualty-disaster triage. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):732-735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, N, White, ML, Tofil, N, et al. Randomized trial comparing two mass casualty triage systems (JumpSTART versus SALT) in a pediatric simulated mass casualty event. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014;18(3):417-423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleber, C, Cwojdzinski, D, Strehl, M, et al. Results of in-hospital triage in 17 mass casualty trainings: underestimation of life-threatening injuries and need for re-triage. Am J Disaster Med. 2013;8(1):5-11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silvestri, S, Field, A, Mangalat, N, et al. Comparison of START and SALT triage methodologies to reference standard definitions and to a field mass casualty simulation. Am J Disaster Med. 2017;12(1):27-33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashkenazi, I, Kessel, B, Olsha, O, et al. Defining the problem, main objective, and strategies of medical management in mass-casualty incidents caused by terrorist events. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(1):82-89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayram, JD, Zuabi, S, Subbarao, I. Disaster metrics: quantitative benchmarking of hospital surge capacity in trauma-related multiple casualty events. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(2):117-124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, N. Triage and transport decisions after mass casualty incidents. Emerg Nurse. 2006;14(1):22-25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conlon, K, Martin, S. ‘Just send them all to a burn centre’: managing burn resources in a mass casualty incident. J Bus Contin Emerg Plan. 2011;5(2):150-160.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirshberg, A, Frykberg, ER, Mattox, KL, et al. Triage and trauma workload in mass casualty: a computer model. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1074-1082.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanter, RK. Strategies to improve pediatric disaster surge response: potential mortality reduction and tradeoffs. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(12):2837-2842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, JL, Kovalchick, DF, Harter, L, et al. Hazardous materials events: evaluation of transport to health care facility and evacuation decisions. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(2):99-105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramello, V, Camerini, O, Ricceri, F, et al. Blood bank preparedness for mass casualty incidents and disasters: a pilot study in the Piedmont region, Italy. Vox Sang. 2019;114(3):247-255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dann, EJ, Bonstein, L, Arbov, L, et al. Blood bank protocols for large-scale civilian casualty events: experience from terrorist bombing in Israel. Transfus Med. 2007;17(2):135-139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, DP, Poste, JC, Hicks, T, et al. Hospital bed surge capacity in the event of a mass-casualty incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005;20(3):169-176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haverkort, JM, Bouman, JH, Wind, JD, et al. Continuous development of a major incident in-hospital victim tracking and tracing system, withstanding the challenges of time. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(2):244-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs-Wingo, JL, Cook, HA, Lang, WH. Rapid patient discharge contribution to bed surge capacity during a mass casualty incident: findings from an exercise with New York City hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 2018;27(1):24-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soffer, D, Klausner, J, Bar-Zohar, D, et al. Usage of blood products in multiple-casualty incidents: the experience of a level I trauma center in Israel. Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):983-989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookman, K, Zane, R. Expedited electronic entry: a new way to manage mass-casualty radiology order workflow. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013;28(4):391-392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rentschler, JE. Why resilience matters-the poverty impacts of disasters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2013. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. Emergency response framework (ERF). 2017. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/258604 Google Scholar
World Health Organization. A systematic review of public health emergency operations centres (EOC). December 2013. 2014. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/99043/WHO_HSE_GCR_2014.1_eng.pdf Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Strengthening health-system emergency preparedness. Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management Copenhagen: WHO Reginal Office for Europe. 2012. Accessed November 15, 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/strengthening-health-system-emergency-preparedness Google Scholar
National Academies of Science Engineering & Medicine. Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. National Academies Press; 2020.Google Scholar
US Department of Health & Human Services. Radiation Emergency Medical Management (REMM). Triage guidelines including radiation triage guidelines. Accessed December 16, 2020. https://remm.hhs.gov/radtriage.htm Google Scholar
Murray, R, Elmes, P, Fly, D. Hospital disaster preparedness self-assessment tool. American College of Emergency Physicians: 44. Accessed March 15, 2021. https://www.calhospitalprepare.org/post/hospital-disaster-preparedness-self-assessment-tool Google Scholar
Cosgrove, S, Jenckes, M, Kohri, K, et al. Evaluation of hospital disaster drills: a module-based approach. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no 290-02-0018) AHRQ Publication. 2004;(04-0032). Accessed December 20, 2022. https://archive.ahrq.gov/research/hospdrills/ Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Diagram.

Figure 1

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Figure 2

Table 2. Study design of included articles (n = 181)

Figure 3

Figure 2. Comparison of included studies from HICs versus LMICs.

Figure 4

Table 3. Essential components and sub-components of an emergency medical response

Figure 5

Figure 3. Integrated framework of MCI response.

Supplementary material: File

Usoro et al. supplementary material

Usoro et al. supplementary material 1

Download Usoro et al. supplementary material(File)
File 136.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Usoro et al. supplementary material

Usoro et al. supplementary material 2

Download Usoro et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB