Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:20:02.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

City and Reciprocity: The Role of Cultural Beliefs in the Roman Economy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Koenraad Verboven
Koenraad Verboven*
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past decade, the New Institutional Economics have become a popular model for analyzing ancient economic history. However, the notion of cultural beliefs, which plays a central role in Douglass North’s recent work and Avner Greif’s analysis of institutional change, has been largely ignored. This article argues that a neo-institutional approach taking this notion into account offers a better means of understanding how ideology and moral values influenced the ancient economy than the Finleyan model. Rather than acting as a deterministic constraint on human behavior, cultural beliefs help to orient decision making and allow one to anticipate the (re)actions of others.

This article explores two key sets of norms and values in Roman culture that profoundly marked the economy’s institutional framework. The first focused on reciprocity, which supported social networks beyond the confines of the familia-freedmen group and underlay the development of contract and agency law. The second was based on citizenship, which shaped political culture by creating individual rights and obligations that the political elite was given the authority to enforce in order to secure and stimulate both private and common interests. This resulted in Roman law and the distribution of justice. Ideologically, the Roman Empire presented itself as a meta-city that incorporated local communities, which were in turn gradually transformed to fit the civitas model.

Both sets of beliefs lowered transaction costs without threatening the preeminent position of local and imperial aristocracies. Toward the end of the second century CE, local communities weakened as the imperial administration grew stronger, causing local and regional aristocracies to turn to the imperial court and army for status, influence, and power. The ideology of citizenship as the guiding principle of political culture gave way to that of the sacred emperor, who guaranteed divine justice and order.

Type
Ancient Economy
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales - English Edition , Volume 67 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 599 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Les Éditions de l’EHESS 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank my friend François Lerouxel for helping me to improve my French [for the French-language version of this article].

References

1. Wilson, Andrew and Bowman, Alan K., eds., Quantifying the Roman Economy: Methods and Problems (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

2. Scheidel, Walter, Morris, Ian, and Saller, Richard P., eds., The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Bang, Peter F., “ Trade and Empire: In Search of Organizing Concepts for the Roman Economy,” Past and Present 195 (2007): 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Greif, Avner, “ Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies,” Journal of Political Economy 102–5 (1994): 912–50.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., 915-17; North, Douglass C., Understanding the Process of Economic Change (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), 23–80.Google Scholar

5. Finley, Moses I., The Ancient Economy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 45 Google Scholar (author’s emphasis).

6. Ibid., 35-38; Whittaker, Charles, “ Trade and Aristocracy in the Roman Empire,” Opus 4 (1985): 49–75.Google Scholar

7. Finley, , Ancient Economy, 59; Claude Mossé, Le travail en Grèce et à Rome (Paris: PUF, 1971), 44–50.Google Scholar

8. Livy, , Ab Urbe Condita 21.63.3; Henriette Pavis d’Escurac, “ Aristocratie sénatoriale et profits commerciaux,” Ktèma 2 (1977): 339–55.Google Scholar

9. Cicero, On Duty 1.150.

10. “ Quorum ordini conveniunt.” Cicero, De Officiis, trans. Miller, Walter (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1913), 1.151 Google Scholar; reprinted in Nicolet, Claude, Rendre à César. Économie et société dans la Rome antique (Paris: Gallimard, 1988), 176–78.Google Scholar

11. Cicero, On Duty 1.151.

12. Finley, , Ancient Economy, 40–42 and 79–82.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., 60 (author’s emphasis).

14. Ibid., Ancient Economy, 38, 43, and 45.

15. Hopkins, Keith, “ Taxes and Trade in the Roman Empire (200 B.C.-A.D. 400),” The Journal of Roman Studies 70 (1980): 103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Veyne, Paul, “ La ‘plèbe moyenne’ sous le Haut-Empire romain,” Annales HSS 55-6 (2000): 1169–99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Verboven, Koenraad, “ The Associative Order, Status and Ethos of Roman Businessmen in Late Republic and Early Empire,” Athenaeum 95 (2007): 861–93.Google Scholar

16. Hopkins, Keith, “ Elite Mobility in the Roman Empire,” Past and Present 32 (1965): 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Jongman, Willem, The Economy and Society of Pompeii (Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1988), 259–60.Google Scholar

18. d’Escurac, Pavis, “ Aristocratie sénatoriale”; D’Arms, John H., Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1981 Google Scholar); Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew, “ Elites and Trade in the Roman Town,” in City and Country in the Ancient World, eds. Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew and Rich, John (London: Routledge, 1991), 242–77 Google Scholar; and Jean-Paul Morel, “ Élites municipales et manufacture en Italie,” in Les élites municipales de l’Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron, ed. Mireille Cébeillac-Gervasoni (Rome: École française de Rome, 1996), 181–98.

19. Veyne, Paul, Le pain et le cirque. Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique (Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 1976), 136 Google Scholar; Veyne, , “ Vie de Trimalcion,” Annales ESC 16–2 (1961): 213–47.Google Scholar

20. D’Arms, , Commerce and Social Standing, 1-3 Google Scholar. However, the diversity and evolution of European opinion should also be noted: see Kamen, Henry, Europe an Society: 1500-1700 (London: Hutchinson, 1984), 98–103.Google Scholar

21. D’Arms, , Commerce and Social Standing, 46 Google Scholar; Verboven, Koenraad, The Economy of Friends: Economic Aspects of Amicitia and Patronage in the Late Republic (Brussels: Latomus, 2002).Google Scholar

22. “ Libertos faenerare.” Petronius, Satyricon 76.9.

23. For example, see: Horace, Epistles 1.1.52-59; Horace, Odes 1.1.1, 1.1.11-18, 3.24.35-45, and 3.29.58-64; Persius, Satires 5.132-50; Diodorus of Sicily, Historical Library 5.26.3; and Aristotle, Politics, 1253b.8-18.

24. Verboven, Koenraad, “ Mentalité et commerce. Le cas des negotiatores et negotia habentes ,” in Mentalités et choix économiques des Romains, eds. Andreau, Jean, France, Jérôme, and Pittia, Sylvie (Bordeaux: Ausonius, 2004), 179–97.Google Scholar

25. Cicero, , Against Verres 5.168 Google Scholar; Cicero, Pro Flacco 91; Juvenal, Satires 14.256-302, in particular 292-95; and Cicero, Ad Familiares 16.9.4.

26. Cato the Elder, On Agriculture, Preface 3. See also: Cicero, , Pro lege Manilia 18 (“ assiduous and industrious”)Google Scholar; Seneca, Letters to Lucilius 101.3.

27. See the epitaph of the trader Licinius Nepos, who had vainly hoped to become rich: Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum 6.9659 (= 33814); Panciera, Silvio and Zanker, Paul, “ Il ritratto e l’iscrizione di L. Licinius Nepos,” Rendiconti: Atti della Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia 61 (1988-1989): 370–71.Google Scholar

28. Petronius, Satyricon 76.5.

29. Suetonius, Life of Augustus 39.

30. “ Studium negoti gerendi.” Cicero, For Sulla 58; Cicero, For Rabirius Postumus 3.5.25, 3.5.39, and 3.5.45; Horace, Satires 2.3.18; and Verboven, Koenraad, “ Damasippus: The Story of a Businessman?” in Deroux, Carl, ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History (Brussels: Latomus, 1997), 8:195–214.Google Scholar

31. Cicero, Letters to Atticus 14.12.3; Cicero For Rabirius Postumus 23: a clever businessman but mediocriter doctus.

32. “ Litterae thesaurum est et artificium numquam moritur.” Petronius, Satyricon 46.8. On the double meaning of est, see Witke, Charles, “ Petronius Satyricon 46.8: Litterae Thesaurum Est ,” Illinois Classical Studies 14 (1989): 169–73.Google Scholar

33. Cicero, , On Duty 2.87 Google Scholar; Cicero, The Letters to his Friends 5.20.

34. Seneca, Letters to Lucilius 101.3. See also: Cornelius Nepos, Life of Atticus 14.3; Cicero, Letters to Atticus 9.9.4; and L’Année épigraphique (1991): 122a.

35. Plutarch, Numa 17; Pliny the Elder, The Natural History 34.1 and 35.159; Florus, Epitome of Roman History 1.6.3; and Verboven, Koenraad, “ Les collèges et la romanisation dans les provinces occidentales,” in Collegia. Le phénomène associatif dans l’Occident romain, eds. Dondin-Payre, Monique and Tran, Nicolas (Bordeaux: Ausonius, 2012).Google Scholar

36. Tran, Nicolas, Les membres des associations romaines. Le rang social des collegiati en Italie et en Gaules sous le Haut-Empire (Rome: École française de Rome, 2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Liu, Jinyu, Collegia Centonariorum: The Guilds of Textile Dealers in the Roman West (Leyden: Brill, 2009), 6; and Verboven, “ The Associative Order,” 871–72.Google Scholar

37. Weber, Max, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Tübingen: Mohr, 1922), 45.Google Scholar

38. Polanyi, Karl, “ The Economy as Instituted Process,” in Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, eds. Polanyi, Karl, Arensberg, Conrad M., and Pearson, Harry W. (Glencoe: Free Press, 1957), 243–70 Google Scholar; Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, 1944; repr. 2001).

39. Williamson, Oliver E., “ The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead,” Journal of Economic Literature 38-3 (2000): 600-1 Google Scholar; Furubotn, Eirik and Richter, Rudolf, Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997; repr. 2005), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. North, Douglass C., Structure and Change in Economic History (New York: Norton, 1981)Google Scholar, 20-32 and 59-68; North, Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), 51-52 and 92-104; North, Understanding the Process of Economic Change, 48-64; and Thráinn Eggertsson, “ Norms in Economics, with Special Reference to Economic Development,” in Social Norms, eds. Michael Hechter and Karl-Dieter Opp (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001), 76-104. Hence, there remains a gap compared to the initial optimism of the NIE to which many economists continue to subscribe. For a critical perspective, see Sheilagh Ogilvie, “‘Whatever Is, Is Right’? Economic Institutions in Pre-Industrial Europe,” The Economic History Review 60-4 (2007): 649-84.

41. Richter, Rudolf, “ The New Institutional Economics: Its Start, Its Meaning, Its Prospects,” European Business Organization Law Review 6-2 (2005): 161–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42. North, Institutions, 36-45; Nee, Victor and Swedberg, Richard, “ Economic Sociology and New Institutional Economics,” Handbook of New Institutional Economics, eds. Ménard, Claude and Shirley, Mary M. (Berlin: Springer, 2008), 799–800.Google Scholar

43. Elster, Jon, “ Social Norms and Economic Theory,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3-4 (1989): 99–117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nee, Victor, “ Norms and Networks in Economic and Organizational Performance,” The American Economic Review 88-2 (1998): 85–89.Google Scholar

44. Denzau, Arthur T. and North, Douglass C., “ Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions,” Kyklos 47-1 (1994): 14-15 Google Scholar; North, Understanding the Process, 23-37.

45. Granovetter, Mark, “ Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology 91-3 (1985): 481–510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nee, Victor and Ingram, Paul, “ Embeddedness and Beyond: Institutions, Exchange and Social Structure,” in The New Institutionalism in Sociology, eds. , Mary and Nee, Victor (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998), 19–45.Google Scholar

46. See Mangi, Luis Claudio, “ Neoinstitutionalism and the Appropriation of Bourdieu’s Work: A Critical Assessment,” Revista de Administração de Empresas 49-3 (2009): 323–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Bourdieu, Pierre, The Social Structures of the Economy, trans. Turner, Chris (Malden: Polity, 2005 Google Scholar), 10 for the citation and 12 for the notion of immersion.

48. Richter, , “ The New Institutional Economics,” 183–84.Google Scholar

49. Greif, , “ Cultural Beliefs”; Greif, Avner, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50. Boyer, Robert, “ Historiens et économistes face à l’émergence des institutions du marché,” Annales HSS 64-3 (2009): 665–93 Google Scholar; Ogilvie, “‘Whatever Is, Is Right’?” See also: Jeremy Edwards and Sheilagh Ogilvie, “ Contract Enforcement, Institutions, and Social Capital: The Maghribi Traders Reappraised,” The Economic History Review 65-2 (2012): 421-44; Greif, Avner, “ The Maghribi Traders: A Reappraisal?” The Economic History Review 65-2 (2012): 445–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

51. North, , Understanding the Process, 23-37 Google Scholar; Eggertsson, “ Norms in Economics,” 82-83.

52. Williamson, “ The New Institutional Economics,” 596-97.

53. Ogilvie, “‘Whatever Is, Is Right’?” 674-81.

54. Hingley, Richard, Globalizing Roman Culture: Unity, Diversity and Empire (London: Routledge, 2005 Google Scholar); Woolf, Greg, “ Becoming Roman, Staying Greek: Culture, Identity and the Civilizing Process in the Roman East,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 40 (1994): 116–43 Google Scholar; David J. Mattingly, ed., Dialogues in Roman Imperialism: Power, Discourse, and Discrepant Experience in the Roman Empire (Portsmouth: Journal of Roman Archeology, 1997); and Janet Huskinson, “ Elite Culture and the Identity of Empire,” in Experiencing Rome: Culture, Identity and Power in the Roman Empire, ed. Janet Huskinson (London: Routledge, 2000), 95–124.

55. Harris, William V., “ The Late Republic,” in The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, eds. Scheidel, Walter, Morris, Ian, and Saller, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 511–39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Verboven, Koenraad, “ Credit Institutions in Rome,” in The Oxford Handbook of Economies in the Classical World, eds. Bresson, Alain, Cascio, Elio Lo, and Velde, François (Oxford: Oxford University Press Google Scholar, forthcoming).

56. Lendon, John E., Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997 Google Scholar); Horden, Peregrine and Purcell, Nicholas, The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), 463–523 Google Scholar; and Barton, Carlin A., Roman Honor: The Fire in the Bones (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar

57. Valerius Maximus, Memorable Deeds and Sayings 8.14.5; Cicero, Of Duty 1.45. The dignitas of women was linked to sexual modesty: Petronius, Satyricon, 18 and 106; Terence, Heauton Timoroumenos 576. On the dignitas mancipiorum of slaves, see Digest 7.1.15.2 (Ulpian). Lendon, Empire of Honour, 95-103. Although Roman honor ressembles modern Mediterranean honor, there are also marked differences. See: Lendon, John E., “ Roman Honor,” in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, Michael (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 377–403 Google Scholar; Harris, William V., “ The Mediterranean and Ancient History,” in Rethinking the Mediterranean, ed. Harris, William V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 26–28.Google Scholar

58. Lendon, “ Roman Honor,” 381; Barton, Roman Honor, 18-20 and 199-243; Cotton, Hannah M., “ The Role of Cicero’s Letters of Recommendation: Iustitia Versus Gratia? ” Hermes 114-4 (1986): 444.Google Scholar

59. Cicero, For Publius Quinctius 49-50 and 97-98.

60. Seneca the Elder, Controversies 10.1.

61. Digest, 47.10.15.27 (Ulpian); Cicero, Ad Atticum 11.7.6; and Hermann Usener, “ Italische Volksjustiz,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 56 (1901): 1-28.

62. Veyne, Le pain et le cirque, 386.

63. Schwartz, Seth, Were the Jews a Mediterranean Society? Reciprocity and Solidarity in Ancient Judaism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 1–20.Google Scholar

64. Cicero, On Duty 1.56; Seneca, On Benefits 2.18.5; Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 37-39; and Gelzer, Matthias, Die Nobilität der römischen Republik (Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1912), 71 Google Scholar (“ Nah- und Treuverhältnisse”).

65. Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 35-62; Verboven, Koenraad, “ Friendship Among the Romans,” in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, Michael (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 404–21.Google Scholar

66. Cicero, On Duty 1.48; Publilius Syrus, Sentences, ed. W. Meyer (Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1877), B 37.

67. Cicero, On Duty 2.69-70.

68. See the letters of recommendation in: Élizabeth Deniaux, Clientèles et pouvoir à l’époque de Cicero (Rome: École française de Rome, 1993), 213-48; Cotton, “ The Role of Cicero’s Letters.”

69. Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 39-41.

70. Martial, Epigrams 5.18.7-10 and 59; Horace, Epistles 1.7.73 and Satires 2.5.25; Pliny the Younger, Letters 9.30; Cicero, Letters to Atticus 10.15.4; and Verboven, “ Friendship Among the Romans,” 412.

71. Verboven, The Economy of Friends.

72. Seneca, Letters to Lucilius 119; Andreau, Jean, Banking and Business in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

73. Ioannatou, Marina, “ Le code de l’honneur des paiements. Créanciers et débiteurs à la fin de la République romaine,” Annales HSS 56-6 (2001): 1201-21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 174-78; and Cicero, Pro Quinctio, 73. On ancient Greece, see Millet, Paul, Lending and Borrowing in Ancient Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 36-44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On pre-modern Europe, see Muldrew, Craig, The Economy of Obligation: The Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

74. Tacitus, Annals 6.16-17.

75. “ Pertinet ad nostrum officium.” Cicero, Letters to Atticus 12.52.1.

76. Verboven, Koenraad, “ Currency, Bullion and Accounts: Monetary Modes in the Roman World,” Revue belge de numismatique 155 (2009): 111–16.Google Scholar

77. Cicero, For Rabirius Postumus 4-5; Mary Siani-Davies, “ Gaius Rabirius Postumus: A Roman Financier and Caesar’s Political Ally,” Arctos 30 (1996): 207-40; and Siani-Davies, Mary, “ Ptolemy XII Auletes and the Romans,” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 46-3 (1997): 306–40.Google Scholar

78. Cicero, For Rabirius Postumus 3-6.

79. Cicero, Letters to His Friends 13.56; Andreau, Jean, “ À propos de la vie financière à Pouzzoles : Cluvius et Vestorius,” in Les bourgeoisies municipales italiennes aux IIe et Ier siècles av. J.-C. (Paris: Éd. du CNRS, 1983), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

80. Cotton, “ The Role of Cicero’s Letters” ; Deniaux, Clientèles et pouvoir, 213-48; and Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 287-329.

81. Nepos, Life of Atticus 15.1-3.

82. Andreau, “ À propos de la vie financière;” D’Arms, Commerce and Social Standing, 49-55. A comparison can be made with Egnatius Rufus: see Cicero, Letters to his Friends 13.43, 13.44, 13.73, and 13.74.

83. Cicero, Letters to Atticus, 5.12.2 and 5.20.10.

84. Pliny the Younger, Letters 6.30.2-4; Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 245-46.

85. Cicero, For Publius Quinctius 12, 16, and 25; Cicero, Against Verres 2.1.130-52.

86. Rathbone, Dominic, Economic Rationalism and Rural Society in Third-Century A.D. Egypt: The Heroninos Archive and the Appianus Estate (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 58–71 Google Scholar; Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 256-58.

87. Gellius, Aulus, The Attic Nights 20.1.41 Google Scholar; Freyburger, Gérard, Fides. Étude sémantique et religieuse depuis les origines jusqu’à l’époque augustéenne (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1986), 41–49.Google Scholar

88. Digest 17.1.1.4 (Paulus); Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 238; Michel, Jacques, Gratuité en droit romain (Brussels: Université libre de Bruxelles/Institut de sociologie, 1962), 185–86 Google Scholar; and Kirschenbaum, Aaron, Sons, Slaves, and Freedmen in Roman Commerce (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1987), 193–96.Google Scholar

89. Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 279-82.

90. Cicero, For Roscius of Ameria 116; Cicero, For Quintus Roscius the Actor 16.

91. Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 260-64; Zimmermann, Reinhard, The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition (Cape Town: Juta, 1990), 45–58.Google Scholar

92. Verboven, Koenraad, “ The Freedman Economy of Roman Italy,” in Free at Last! The Influence of Freed Slaves on the Roman Empire, eds. Bell, Sinclair and Ramsby, Teresa (London: Bloomsbury, 2012), 88–109.Google Scholar

93. Porto, Andrea di, Impresa collettiva e schiavo “ manager” in Roma Antica (II sec. a.C.-II sec. d.C.) (Milan: A. Giuffrè, 1984 Google Scholar); Aubert, Jean-Jacques, Business Managers in Ancient Rome: A Social and Economic Study of Institores, 200 B.C.-A.D. 250 (Leiden: Brill, 1994)Google Scholar.

94. Mouritsen, Henrik, The Freedman in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 224–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Waldstein, Wolfgang, Operae libertorum. Untersuchungen zur Dienstpflicht freigelassener Sklaven (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1986 Google Scholar); and Michel, La gratuité, 157-68.

95. Digest 38.2.1 (Ulpian); Cicero, Against Verres 2.1.124.

96. See: the title of Digest 37.15; Cicero, Letters to his Friends 1.3.2 and 12.29.2; and Mouritsen, The Freedman, 36-65.

97. For a comparison of clients and members of the family, see: Cato, Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta 200; Aulus Gellius, The Attic Nights 5.13; Virgil, Aeneid 6.608-13; and Verboven, The Economy of Friends, 49-62.

98. Furubotn and Richter, Institutions, 471-99.

99. Bang, “ Trade and Empire” ; Bang, Peter F., The Roman Bazaar: A Comparative Study of Trade and Markets in a Tributary Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 Google Scholar); and Elio Lo Cascio, “ The Role of the State in the Roman Economy: Making Use of the New Institutional Economics,” in Ancient Economies, Modern Methodologies: Archaeology, Comparative History, Models and Institutions, eds. Bang, Peter F., Ikeguchi, Mamoru, and Ziche, Hartmut G. (Bari: Edipuglia, 2006), 231–33.Google Scholar

100. Nicolet, Claude, Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome républicaine (Paris: Gallimard, 1976 Google Scholar); Mazzolani, Lidia Storoni, The Idea of the City in Roman Thought: From Walled City to Spiritual Commonwealth (London: Hollis & Carter, 1970 Google Scholar); and Sherwin-White, Adrian N., The Roman Citizenship (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).Google Scholar

101. Cicero, On Laws 2.5.

102. Kremer, David, Ius latinum. Le concept de droit latin sous la République et l’Empire. Romanité et modernité du droit (Paris: De Boccard, 2006).Google Scholar

103. Nicolet, Le métier, 31-32; Pernot, Laurent, ed., Éloges grecs de Rome (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1997 Google Scholar). In particular, see: Aelius Aristides, The Encomium on Rome; Richard Klein, Die Romrede des Aelius Aristides. Einführung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1981).

104. In particular, see the Oratio Claudiana: Tacitus, Annals 11.24; Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, 13.1668; and Craig B. Champion, “ Imperial Ideologies, Citizenship Myths, and Legal Disputes in Classical Athens and Republican Rome,” in A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, ed. Ryan K. Balot (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), 92-94.

105. Nicolet, Le métier, 39-66.

106. Cicero, On the Republic 1.39.

107. Digest 1.4.1, principium (Ulpian); Ando, Clifford, Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar), 30 and 44-45; Lobur, John A., Consensus, Concordia, and the Formation of Roman Imperial Ideology (London: Routledge, 2008 Google Scholar); and Millar, Fergus, “ mperial Ideology in the Tabula Siarensis,” in Estudios sobre la Tabula Siarensis, eds. González, Julián and Arce, Javier (Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientiéficas, 1988), 11–19.Google Scholar

108. Lyasse, Emmanuel, “ L’utilisation des termes res publica dans le quotidien institutionnel des cités. Vocabulaire politique romain et réalités locales,” in Le quotidien municipal dans l’Occident romain, eds. Berrendonner, Clara, Cébeillac-Gervasoni, Mireille, and Lamoine, Laurent (Clermont-Ferrand: Presses universitaires Blaise-Pascal, 2008), 191-92 Google Scholar; Henrik Mouritsen, Elections, Magistrates and Municipal Elite: Studies in Pompeian Epigraphy (Rome: “ L’Erma” di Bretschneider, 1988).

109. Lyasse, “ L’utilisation,” 191.

110. Petronius, Satyricon 44.5.

111. Dio Chrysostom, Orationes 46.

112. For example, see: Plutarch, Praecepta Gerendae Reipublicae 822a; Arjan Zuiderhoek, The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire: Citizens, Elites, and Benefactors in Asia Minor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 71-77 and 133-53 (against Veyne, Le pain et le cirque, 230-32 and 319). See also Andreau, Jean, Schmitt, Pauline, and Schnapp, Alain, “ Paul Veyne et l’évergétisme,” Annales ESC 33-2 (1978): 307–25.Google Scholar

113. “ Ius est ars boni et aequi.” Digest 1.1.1.1 (Ulpian).

114. Cicero, On the Republic 6.13.2; Claudius Rutilius Namatianus, On His Return 1.63-66; and Ando, Imperial Ideology, 9-10 and 47-48.

115. Cicero, Against Verres 5.168; Pliny the Younger, Letters 10.96.4; and The Acts of the Apostles 16:37, 22:26-29, and 25:10-12.

116. For example, see: the senatus consultum De Asclepiade in Inscriptiones Graecae ad Res Romanas Pertinentes, 118; Ando, Imperial Ideology, 408-10.

117. Oudshoorn, Jacobine G., The Relationship Between Roman and Local Law in the Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives: General Analysis and Three Case Studies on Law of Succession, Guardianship and Marriage (Leiden: Brill, 2007); Ando, Imperial Ideology, 375-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

118. Kremer, Ius Latinum, 128-34.

119. Jolowicz, Herbert F. and Nicholas, Barry, Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law (Cambridge: University Press, 1972), 97–101 Google Scholar; Bürge, Alfons, Römisches Privatrecht. Rechtsdenken und gesellschaftliche Verankerung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1999 Google Scholar), 17-44 and 72-80.

120. Acts of the Apostles 22:26-29 and 25:10-12, in addition to 16:37; Pliny the Younger, Letters 10.96.4; Jolowicz and Nicholas, Historical Introduction, 365-73; and Bürge, Römisches Privatrecht, 80-86.

121. Frier, Bruce W., The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Bürge, , Römisches Privatrecht, 87–114 Google Scholar; and Jolowicz, and Nicholas, , Historical Introduction, 374–94.Google Scholar

122. Kehoe, Dennis, “ Law and Social Formation in the Roman Empire,” in The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, ed. Peachin, Michael (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 155–56 Google Scholar; Meyer, Elizabeth A., Legitimacy and Law in the Roman World: Tabulae in Roman Belief and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 3-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

123. Kelly, John M., Roman Litigation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966 Google Scholar); Garnsey, Peter, Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), 216–17.Google Scholar

124. Ando, Imperial Ideology, 373-80.

125. P. Yale 1.61.

126. Cicero, Pro Quinctio 24.6.

127. Cicero, Letters to Quintus 1.1.34; Tacitus, Histories 4.74.1; and Aelius Aristides, To Rome 39; Virgil, Aeneid 6.852-53.

128. Sefer Ha-Aggadah 5.91; Ando, Imperial Ideology, 56.

129. Andreau, Jean, “ La cité romaine dans ses rapports à l’échange et au monde de l’échange,” in Économie antique. Les échanges dans l’Antiquité, le rôle de l’État (Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges: Musée archéologique départemental, 1994), 83–98 Google Scholar.

130. Cicero, On the Manilian Law 11; Cicero, Against Verres 5.150; and Patterson, John, “ Trade and Traders in the Roman World: Scale, Structure and Organization,” in Trade, Traders and the Ancient City, eds. Parkins, Helen and Smith, Christopher (London: Routledge, 1998), 149–67 Google Scholar. Rome only very rarely demanded commercial privileges (e.g., in the case of Ambracia: see Livy, Ab Urbe condita 38.44).

131. Polybius, Histories 2.8.

132. Horden and Purcell, The Corrupting Sea, 112-22.

133. Pliny the Elder, Natural History 14.2. See also: Philo of Alexandria, Embassy to Gaius 47; Rev. 18:11-19; Cicero, Against Verres 2.2.6; and Patterson, “ Trade and Traders in the Roman World.”

134. Garnsey, Peter, Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sirks, Adriaan Boudewijn, Food for Rome: The Legal Structure of the Transportation and Processing of Supplies for the Imperial Distributions in Rome and Constantinople (Amsterdam: Gieben, 1991)Google Scholar.

135. Petronius, Satyricon 44.

136. Digest 50.4.1.2 (Hermogenianus) and 50.4.18 (Arcadius Charisius); Erdkamp, Paul, The Grain Market in the Roman Empire: A Social, Political and Economic Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 258–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mrozek, Stanislaw, “ Le problème de l’annone dans les villes italiennes du Haut Empire romain,” in Le ravitaillement en blé de Rome et des centres urbains des débuts de la République jusqu’au Haut Empire (Rome: École française de Rome, 1994), 95–101 Google Scholar. Sitophylakes existed for several centuries in Greek cities, but curatores annonae were only established beginning in the second century CE.

137. “ De lege Iulia de annona.” Digest 48.12.

138. Lex Irnitana 75.

139. Digest 50.8.2 (Ulpian).

140. Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum 5.1874; Prosopographia Imperii Romani I2 A1088; Mrozek, “ Le problème,” 98; and Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Life of Marcus Aurelius 11.3.

141. Suetonius, Life of Augustus 42.3.

142. Digest 48.12.3 (Papirius Iustus), 50.1.8 (Marcianus), and 8.7, principium (Paulus).

143. L’année épigraphique 126 (1925); P.Oxy. 42.3048; Erdkamp, The Grain Market in the Roman Empire, 283-305.

144. Cicero, On Duty 2.60. However, the people did not always appreciate this: see Zuiderhoek, The Politics, 108-9.

145. Finley, The Ancient Economy, 159-60. With the possible exception of eastern trade, see Young, Gary, Rome’s Eastern Trade: International Commerce and Imperial Policy, 31 BC-AD 305 (London: Routledge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

146. Pliny the Younger, Panegyric to Trajan 29; Rougé, Jean, Recherches sur l’organisation du commerce maritime en Méditerranée sous l’Empire romain (Paris: SEVPEN, 1966), 456–65 Google Scholar; and Pliny the Younger, Letters 10.41, 10.42, 10.61, and 10.62.

147. Veyne, Le pain et le cirque, 385-90; Saller, Richard, Personal Patronage Under the Early Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cotton, “ The Role”; and Eich, Peter, Zur Metamorphose des politischen Systems in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Die Entstehung einer “ personalen Bürokratie” im langen dritten Jahrhundert (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2005), 67–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

148. Ando, Imperial Ideology, 385-405; Benoist, Stéphane, Rome, le prince et la cité. Pouvoir impérial et cérémonies publiques, Ier siècle av.-début du IVe siècle apr. J.-C. (Paris: PUF, 2005)Google Scholar.

149. Jacques, François, Le privilège de liberté. Politique impériale et autonomie municipale dans les cités de l’Occident romain (Rome: École française de Rome, 1984), 1–301 Google Scholar.

150. Rapp, Claudia, Holy Bishops in Late Antiquity: The Nature of Christian Leadership in an Age of Transition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.