Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:52:49.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taphonomy and ecology of modern avifaunal remains from Amboseli Park, Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Anna K. Behrensmeyer ,
C. Tristan Stayton  and
Ralph E. Chapman
Anna K. Behrensmeyer
Affiliation:
Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012. E-mail: [email protected]
C. Tristan Stayton
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637
Ralph E. Chapman
Affiliation:
Applied Morphometrics Laboratory, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0121. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Avian skeletal remains occur in many fossil assemblages, and in spite of small sample sizes and incomplete preservation, they may be a source of valuable paleoecological information. In this paper, we examine the taphonomy of a modern avian bone assemblage and test the relationship between ecological data based on avifaunal skeletal remains and known ecological attributes of a living bird community. A total of 54 modern skeletal occurrences and a sample of 126 identifiable bones from Amboseli Park, Kenya, were analyzed for weathering features and skeletal part preservation in order to characterize preservation features and taphonomic biases. Avian remains, with the exception of ostrich, decay more rapidly than adult mammal bones and rarely reach advanced stages of weathering. Breakage and the percentage of anterior limb elements serve as indicators of taphonomic overprinting that may affect paleoecological signals. Using ecomorphic categories including body weight, diet, and habitat, we compared species in the bone assemblage with the living Amboseli avifauna. The documented bone sample is biased toward large body size, representation of open grassland habitats, and grazing or scavenging diets. In spite of this, multidimensional scaling analysis shows that the small faunal sample (16 out of 364 species) in the pre-fossil bone assemblage accurately represents general features of avian ecospace in Amboseli. This provides a measure of the potential fidelity of paleoecological reconstructions based on small samples of avian remains. In the Cenozoic, the utility of avian fossils is enhanced because bird ecomorphology is relatively well known and conservative through time, allowing back-extrapolations of habitat preferences, diet, etc. based on modern taxa.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 52 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, P. 1995. Mammals as palaeoecological indicators. Acta Zoologica Cracov 38:59–72.Google Scholar
Andrews, P., Lord, J., and Evans, E. M. N. 1979. Patterns of ecological diversity in fossil and modern mammalian faunas. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 11:177–205.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4:150–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1991. Terrestrial vertebrate accumulations. Pp. 291–335in Allison, P. and Briggs, D. E. G., eds. Taphonomy: releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1993. The bones of Amboseli. National Geographic Research and Exploration 9:402–421.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., and Chapman, R. E. 1993. Models and simulations of taphonomic time-averaging in terrestrial vertebrate assemblages. In Kidwell, S. and Behrensmeyer, A. K., eds. Taphonomic approaches to time resolution in fossil assemblages. Short Courses in Paleontology 6:125–149. Paleontological Society, Knoxville, Tenn.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., and Boaz, D. E. Dechant 1980. The recent bones of Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Pp. 72–92in Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Hill, A., eds. Fossils in the making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., Western, D., and Boaz, D. E. Dechant 1979. New perspectives in paleoecology from a recent bone assemblage, Amboseli Park, Kenya. Paleobiology 5:12–21.Google Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K., Kidwell, S. M., and Gastaldo, R. A. 2000. Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26(Suppl. to No. 4):103–144.Google Scholar
Bickart, K. J. 1984. A field experiment in avian taphonomy. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 4:525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, T. M., Kraus, M. J., Wing, S. L., Fleagle, J. G., Tiffney, B. H., Simons, E. L., and Vondra, C. F. 1982. The Fayum primate forest revisited. Journal of Human Evolution 11:603–632.Google Scholar
Brown, L. H., Urban, E. K., and Newman, K. 1982–1997. The birds of Africa, Vols. 1–5. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Damuth, J. D. 1992. Taxon-free characterization of animal communities. Pp.183–203in A. Behrensmeyer, K. et al., eds. Terrestrial ecosystems through time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Damuth, J. D. 1997. ETE Database Manual. Evolution of Terrestrial ecosystems Consortium, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Davis, P. G., and Briggs, D. E. G. 1998. The impact of decay and disarticulation on the preservation of fossil birds. Palaios 13:3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emslie, S. D., Allmon, W. D., Rich, F. J., Wrenn, J. H., and de France, S. D. 1996. Integrated taphonomy of an avian death assemblage in marine sediments from the late Pliocene of Florida. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 124:107–136.Google Scholar
Ericson, G. P. 1987. Interpretations of archaeological bird remains: a taphonomic approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 14:65–75.Google Scholar
Hendy, Q. B. 1981. Palaeoecology of the late Tertiary fossil occurrences in ‘E’ Quarry, Langebaanweg, South Africa, and a reinterpretation of their geological context. Annals of the South African Museum 84:1–104.Google Scholar
Hill, A. 1989. Bone modification by modern spotted hyenas. Pp. 169–176in Bonnichsen, R. and Sorg, M., eds. Bone modification. Center for the Study of the First Americans, Orono, Maine.Google Scholar
Hill, A., and Walker, A. 1979. A fossil Marabou (Aves: Ciconiidae) from the Miocene Ngorora Formation, Baringo District, Kenya. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 29:215–220.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. T. 1985. Review of the late Pleistocene avifauna from lake Manix, central Mojave Desert, California. Contributions in Science (Los Angeles) No. 362.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. 1967. Competition for food between vultures in East Africa. Ardea 55:172–93.Google Scholar
Livingston, S. J. 1989. The taphonomic interpretation of avian skeletal part frequencies. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:537–47.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 1994. Vertebrate taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCune, B., and Mefford, M. J. 1999. PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore.Google Scholar
Newman, K. 1988. Newman's birds of southern Africa. Southern Book Publishers, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. S., and Graham, R. W. 1994. A catastrophic kill of ice-trapped coots: time-averaged versus scavenger-specific disarticulation patterns. Paleobiology 20:229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. L. 1985. The fossil record of birds. Pp. 79–238in Farner, D. S. et al., eds. Avian biology, Vol. 8. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L. ed. 1999. Avian paleontology at the close of the 20th century. Proceedings of the Fourth International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Washington, D.C., 4–7 June 1996. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology No. 89.Google Scholar
Olson, S. L., and Pregill, G. K. 1982. Fossil and subfossil birds from the Bahamas, Pp. 22–65in Olson, S. L., ed. Fossil vertebrates from the Bahamas. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology No. 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, S. L., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1986. Paleoenvironment of the earliest hominoids: new evidence from the Oligocene avifauna of Egypt. Science 233:1202–1204.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. T., Olson, S. L., and Simons, E. L. 1987. Fossil birds from the Oligocene Jebel Qatrani Formation, Fayum Province, Egypt. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 62:1–20.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D. T., Bown, T. M., and Simons, E. L. 1992. The Eocene-Oligocene transition in continental Africa. Pp. 548–566in Prothero, D. R. and Berggren, W. A., eds. Eocene-Oligocene climatic and biotic evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, P. V. 1979. Fossil birds of old Gondwanaland: a comment on drifting continents and their passengers. Pp. 321–332in Gray, J. and Boucot, A., eds. Historical biogeography, plate tectonics, and the changing environment. Oregon State University Press, Corvalis.Google Scholar
Rich, P. V. 1980. Preliminary report of the fossil avian remains from late Tertiary sediments at Langebaanweg (Cape Province), South Africa. South African Journal of Science 76:166–170.Google Scholar
Steadman, D. W. 1984. A middle Pleistocene (Late Irvingtonian) avifauna from Payne Creek, central Florida. Special Publication of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History 8:47–52.Google Scholar
Steadman, D. W. 1989. Extinction of birds in eastern Polynesia: a review of the record, and comparison with other Pacific island groups. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:177–205.Google Scholar
Steadman, D. W., and Intoh, M. 1994. Biogeography and prehistoric exploitation of birds from Fais Island, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia. Pacific Science 48:116–135.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1969a. Taphonomy and populations dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, Special Paper 1:1–69.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1969b. Sampling difficulties in reconstructing late Tertiary mammalian communities. Pp. 454–468in Proceedings North American Palaeontological Convention, Part E.Google Scholar
Western, D. 1973. The structure, dynamics and changes of the Amboseli ecosystem. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Nairobi, Nairobi.Google Scholar
Western, D. 1975. Water availability and its influence on the structure and dynamics of a savanna large mammal community. East African Wildlife Journal 13:265–286.Google Scholar
Western, D. 1980. Linking the ecology of past and present mammal communities. Pp. 41–54in Beherensmeyer, A. K. and Hill, A., eds. Fossils in the making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Western, D., and Van Praet, C. 1973. Cyclical changes in the habitat and climate of an East African ecosystem. Nature 241:104–106.Google Scholar
Williams, J. G. 1967. A field guide to the national parks of East Africa. Collins Clear-Type Press, London.Google Scholar
Williams, J. G., and Arlott, N. 1963. A field guide to the birds of East Africa. William Collins, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. G. 1973. Hydrodynamic sorting and ecology of a Pleistocene mammalian assemblage from California (USA). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 13:91–101.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Erratum