Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:19:28.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive traits of the round sardinella in the Canary Islands (Spain, NW Africa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2022

Alba Jurado-Ruzafa*
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Begoña Sotillo de Olano
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Zoraida Santana Arocha
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Bertín García Mañé
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Clara Estil-las García
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Eva Hernández
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Sebastián Jiménez
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Gustavo González-Lorenzo
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Catalina Perales-Raya
Affiliation:
Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO-CSIC), C. Farola de Mar n. 22 (38180), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Alba Jurado-Ruzafa, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the reproductive biology of the small pelagic Sardinella aurita Valenciennes, 1847 in the Canary Islands, to enable its reliable assessment and advise on appropriate management measures for a fishing resource showing a declining trend in landings. Reproductive biology and sexual patterns of round sardinella were examined from monthly random samples of commercial catches landed by the artisanal purse-seine fleet. The landings' length frequencies, ranging between 9–32 cm (based on the total lengths, TL), were recorded from 2013–2019. The overall mean value of TL was 20.9 cm, with annual mean values between 20–22 cm, except in 2016 (TL = 19 cm). The overall sex ratio M:F was 1:0.92, with males significantly predominant. Sex ratios fluctuated as a function of size and month: females were more abundant in the larger length classes, as well as before and after spawning, whereas males were more abundant in the smaller length classes and during spawning. Based on gonad maturity stages and gonadosomatic index, round sardinella spawns during almost all the year, with a peak in January–February and a resting period during October–November. The length at first maturity was estimated at TL of 18.2 cm, notably smaller than the value obtained for the NW African coastal waters where the demographic structure in round sardinellas' landings is totally different.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

The round sardinella, Sardinella aurita Valenciennes, 1847, is a coastal small pelagic fish widely distributed in the Atlantic Ocean, including the eastern coastal waters from the Gulf of Biscay to South Africa, with higher abundances in the three West African upwelling areas (the highest, off Mauritania), the Mediterranean and Black Seas. In the western Atlantic Ocean, it occurs from Cape Cod in the USA to Argentina (Froese & Pauly, Reference Froese and Pauly2021). Round sardinella is a schooling, strongly migratory and warm-water species, with preferred temperatures between 18–25°C (Bianchi et al., Reference Bianchi, Carpenter, Roux, Molloy, Boyer and Boyer1999). Its resilience and plasticity to adapt itself to new environments (Baldé et al., Reference Baldé, Sow, Ba, Ekau, Brehmer, Kantoussan, Fall and Diouf2019) is leading the expansion of S. aurita, driven by global warming (Sabatés et al., Reference Sabatés, Martín, Lloret and Raya2006; Tsikliras, Reference Tsikliras2008; Zeeberg et al., Reference Zeeberg, Corten, Tjoe-Awie, Coca and Hamady2008).

There are noticeable differences in the commercial relevance of round sardinella among countries, being highly targeted by some fisheries (such as in Mauritanian waters, where round sardinella also constitutes a primary source for the fishmeal industry (Corten et al., Reference Corten, Braham and Sadegh2017)), retained bycatch, or even discarded in others (FAO, in press).

The Canary Islands (located in the central-eastern Atlantic Ocean between 27–29°N and 13–18°W, Figure 1) is a Macaronesian archipelago characterized by abrupt bathymetry, with profiles that rise sharply from depths of over 2000 m to narrow island shelves. There are deep inter-island channels and the islands act as obstacles to the south-westwards flow of the Canary Current and the trade winds (Barton et al., Reference Barton, Arístegui, Tett, Cantón, García-Braun, Hernández-León, Nykjaer, Almeida, Almunia, Ballesteros, Basterretxea, Escánez, García-Weill, Hernández-Guerra, López-Laatzen, Molina, Montero, Navarro-Pérez, Rodríguez, van Lenning, Vélez and Wild1998; Arístegui et al., Reference Arístegui, Álvarez-Salgado, Barton, Figueiras, Hernández-León, Roy, Santos, Robinson and Brink2006). In contrast to the nearby NW African coast, one of the richest fishery regions worldwide, the Canary Islands are characterized by oligotrophic waters, leading to low rates of primary production and limited fishing resources (Braun, Reference Braun1980). Among others, these characteristics make the region rather low productive, where pelagic species produce the main fishery yields in biomass. In this context, after tuna, small pelagic species are the main fishing resource in the archipelago, round sardinella being one of the four species targeted by the artisanal purse-seine fleet (Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, González-Lorenzo, Jiménez, Sotillo, Acosta and Santamaría2019). The monitoring of this fishery and the assessment of the targeted species have been included in the framework of the Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic (CECAF) since 2015 (FAO, 2016). For statistical purposes, S. aurita is grouped with S. maderensis (Lowe, 1838) as Sardinella spp. due to known taxonomic misidentification in the official reporting process (FAO, 2020). Based on the short time series (considered reliable from 2013 onwards), the importance of Sardinella spp. in landings has strongly decreased in the region since 2018 (from 400 mean tons/year during 2013–2017 to 94 mean tons/year during 2018–2020). A similar trend is shown by the European sardine, Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) (FAO, in press), which has almost disappeared in the Canary Islands waters since 2019. These two species constitute one of the species groups (clupeids) defined in the region, with higher landings during the warmer season; whereas the other group, conformed by medium-sized pelagic species (i.e. Scomber colias Gmelin, 1789 and Trachurus spp.) shows higher landings during the cooler season (Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, González-Lorenzo, Jiménez, Sotillo, Acosta and Santamaría2019).

Fig. 1. Study area allocation and name of the eight islands which constitute the Canary Islands archipelago.

Despite the importance of the species for the local market, little is known about the life history traits of the species inhabiting Canary Islands waters. In addition, aside from the technical regulations imposed on the fleet, any specific consideration is applied to S. aurita at the national level, not even a size limitation. The short time series available and the limited knowledge of the biology of the species in the area make it a typical data-poor stock whose assessment has not been feasible so far (Quinzán & Jurado-Ruzafa, Reference Quinzán and Jurado-Ruzafain press).

Based on the high variability in the reproductive traits of this strongly adaptable species (Whitehead, Reference Whitehead, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielsen and Tortonese1984, Reference Whitehead1985), the aim of the present study was to describe the main reproductive traits of the round sardinella inhabiting the Canary Islands waters, in order to provide updated information and useful knowledge for the assessors and managers of a critically decreasing species.

Materials and methods

In January 2013, a long-term monitoring system was launched for the artisanal purse-seine fleet in the Canary Islands, through the European Data Collection Framework (EU, 2017). When available, 100 randomly selected individuals were measured on a monthly basis for their total length (TL, precision 0.1 cm) and weighed (TW, precision 0.1 g). Sex and maturity are assigned macroscopically, based on a general 5-stages key (Holden & Raitt, Reference Holden and Raitt1975). Virgins and recovering individuals were considered immature, and the maturing, spawning and post-spawning individuals were considered mature. Finally, gonad weight (GW, precision 0.1 g) was recorded. In addition to the biological analyses, length samplings of commercial landings of the metier are performed in both fish markets and onboard. During these samplings, length classes (L i, to the lower cm) and weight of the total fish sampled were registered. Based on all the length data (including biological analyses, length samplings in fish markets and onboard), the total and annual length frequencies were obtained. Length and biological samplings of round sardinellas commercial landings are carried out in Tenerife, where more than 70% of the total landings of small pelagic species in the archipelago are performed (FAO, 2020). During 2020, commercial catches of S. aurita were not available for sampling due to several reasons (including the pandemic situation). As a consequence, a total of 17,320 individuals caught between 2013 and 2019 and covering length classes from 9–32 cm were measured from commercial landings in the Canary Islands.

Length-weight relationships (LWR) were calculated using the log-transformation of the power formula TW = a × TLb (where a is the condition factor and b is the allometry coefficient). A Student t-test was applied to compare LWRs between sexes. Growth pattern (allometry) was tested using the Student's t-test modified by Pauly (Reference Pauly1984).

Sex ratio was studied for the whole sample, by quarters and by L i. The χ2 test was applied to detect significant differences in the hypothesized 1:1 relationship (Zar, Reference Zar1996). Spawning behaviour was followed based on the seasonal changes in gonad development, including both sexes, by correlating two approaches: quantitative (the quarterly evolution of the mean gonadosomatic index (GSI = GW × 1000/TW)) and qualitative (the monthly variation of the percentage of mature stages vs the immature ones) (Jennings et al., Reference Jennings, Kaiser and Reynolds2001; King, Reference King2007).

The length at first maturity (LFM, length at which 50% of individuals are in sexually mature stage) was estimated from the curves of maturity by length class (L i). Proportions of mature specimens (p i; mature sexuality was considered for individuals in stage III, IV and V) were estimated for each L i including the whole year, as spawning individuals are found all the year round. Maturity ogives were then estimated using the non-linear regression of the Gompertz model (Pope et al., Reference Pope, Margetts, Hamley and Akyüz1983). The equation for the model is: pi = exp[ − β × exp(β1 × L i)], pi being the proportion of mature individuals for each L i (p’ for moving average was used = (p i−1 + p i + p i+1)/3), and β and β1 were the function parameters.

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 15.0 and Microsoft Office Excel 2019.

Results

A summary of descriptive statistics for the 7363 round sardinellas sampled in the laboratory is presented in Table 1, jointly to the LWR estimations. In all the cases, the power formula fitted well to the observed data (R 2 > 0.96) and no statistically significant differences were found between sexes (Student's t = 1.056; P > 0.05). Growth pattern should be taken with caution. No differences are evident between sexes, therefore the growth pattern assumed by the authors is the isometric model obtained for the whole sample of round sardinellas analysed, which includes the widest length range.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the round sardinella biologically analysed in the Canary Islands from commercial landings (time period 2013–2019) and LWR estimated for the total and by sex

N, number of individuals; TL, total length; TW, total weight; Min–Max, minimum–maximum; SD, standard deviation. For the length-weight relationships (LWR): a and b are the estimated parameters of the power function, R 2 the correlation factor, GP is the growth pattern (* P < 0.05, based on the Student t-test modified by Pauly (Reference Pauly1984)), being isometric growth (I) when b = 3, or allometric positive or negative (A + or A−, respectively) if b ≠ 3.

The analysis of the whole sample (Figure 2) resulted in a bi-modal length structure, with the main mode representing adult individuals of 20–23 cm (accounting for more than 50% of the fish measured) and the smaller mode accounting for the 4% of individuals of 12–13 cm, probably juveniles. Although the sampling design has been maintained throughout the study period, when observing the annual length frequencies, no clear pattern was observed. One main mode is clear around 20 cm, but with a noticeable exception in 2016 when a tri-modal distribution was obtained with an averaged TL lower than for the other years of the period. The low number of individuals measured in 2019 was mainly due to the obvious decrease in landings which made the availability of the species difficult.

Fig. 2. Total and annual length frequencies (%) of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands. N, number of fish measured; $\overline {{\rm TL}}$, average total length.

Considering the overall analyses, males significantly outnumbered females in a proportion 1:0.92 (χ2 = 11.043, P = 0.001). On a monthly basis, different sex ratios were found with balanced proportions or a major presence of males, with the exception of January, when females outnumbered males when the whole study period was considered (Figure 3). However, a noticeable variability was found in the sex ratio among length classes (L i), mainly among the largest sizes of the range (>19 cm), with males being predominant in the length classes 19–21, a balanced sex ratio occurred in L i = 22–23 cm, and females being predominant from 24 cm onwards (Figure 4).

Fig. 3. Monthly sex ratios of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019). (*) indicates χ2 values with P > 0.05, meaning balanced sex ratios.

Fig. 4. Sex ratios by length class of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019). (*) indicates χ2 values with P > 0.05, meaning balanced sex ratios.

The quarterly evolution of the GSI did not allow identification of clear seasonal spawning peaks, but the lowest mean GSIs occurred in the fourth quarter (Figure 5). Most of the spawning activity happened during the first and/or second quarters except in 2015, when the highest GSI occurred during the third quarter. On the other hand, no clear recruitment seasons were observed in the time period studied, based on the quarterly averaged TL of the landings analysed. Nevertheless, the monthly proportion of mature/immature individuals found in landings (Figure 6) seems to indicate a noticeable spawning peak from January to February, when more than 90% of the analysed individuals were sexually mature. Additionally, a short time period with high proportion of immatures between October and November indicates a period of recovery process.

Fig. 5. Quarterly evolution of the mean values of the gonadosomatic index (GSI) and the total length (TL) of the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands.

Fig. 6. Monthly proportions of mature and immature sexual stages of the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019).

Results of the maturity ogive fitting the Gompertz model are presented in Figure 7 (β = −678.5 SE = 0.325; β1 = −0.379 SE = 0.015), and the LFM estimated for p i = 0.5 was 18.2 cm.

Fig. 7. Maturity ogive obtained for the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019).

The p i is the mature proportion by length class (L i, cm). R 2 is the coefficient of determination when fitting the p i observed by L i to the Gompertz model (resulting formula presented in the graph).

Discussion

The annual landings series show a drastic decrease in the landings of clupeids in the Canary Islands waters since 2019 (FAO, 2020). Santamaría et al. (Reference Santamaría, González, Barrera, López Abellán, Quintero, Balguerías, Fréon, Barange and Arístegui2008) suggested a replacement of the European sardine by round sardinella in the archipelago. However, Jurado-Ruzafa et al. (Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, González-Lorenzo, Jiménez, Sotillo, Acosta and Santamaría2019) detected significant seasonal patterns in landings related to the environmental variations, grouping clupeids (Sardinella spp. and S. pilchardus) on one hand, and medium pelagic on the other. Both sardinellas and European sardines are experiencing a decreasing trend in the latest years. In this context, the almost collapse of S. pilchardus in Atlantic Iberian waters observed until 2019 (when a total ban was imposed in Portuguese waters), as well as the stopping of the purse-seiners activity in Spanish Iberian waters during 2019 and 2020 (ICES, 2021) should have alerted managers in the Canary region to avoid the probable consequences in the archipelago, where these species represent residual landings by the artisanal purse-seiners since 2019.

The annual length frequencies of round sardinella landings in the Canary Islands between 2013 and 2019 did not show any clear pattern. However, length frequencies clearly differed from the demographic structures found in NW African countries, including noticeably larger individuals (up to ~40 cm sized individuals, with modes in ~20–22 cm, ~26 and ~30 cm) (Baldé et al., Reference Baldé, Sow, Ba, Ekau, Brehmer, Kantoussan, Fall and Diouf2019; Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020). The growth pattern observed in the present study should be considered as an informative punctual-trait, to be updated ad hoc if necessary in future studies, because (a) statistically significant differences between sexes were rejected, and (b) previous works in the area showed different results as well as significant seasonal variations (Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Bartolomé, Carrasco and Duque-Nogal2016).

The overall sex ratio obtained for the round sardinella in the Canary Islands resulted in a significant unbalance towards males, in contrast with NW African waters where balanced sex ratios have been observed off Mauritania (Wagué & M'Bodj, Reference Wagué and M'Bodj2002; Chesheva, Reference Chesheva2006), or where females predominated in landings off South Morocco (Baali et al., Reference Baali, Bourassi, Falah, Abderrazik, Manchih, Amenzoui and Yahyaoui2017), Mauritania (Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020) and Senegal (Boëly, Reference Boëly1982; Ndiaye et al., Reference Ndiaye, Sarr, Faye, Thiaw, Diouf, Ba, Ndiaye, Lazar and Thiaw2018; Baldé et al., Reference Baldé, Sow, Ba, Ekau, Brehmer, Kantoussan, Fall and Diouf2019). Unbalance to females is also reported in the Mediterranean Sea (Tsikliras & Antonopoulou, Reference Tsikliras and Antonopoulou2006; Mustac & Sinovcic, Reference Mustac and Sinovcic2012). Regarding the sex ratio variation by length range, the predominance of females in the largest sizes, as well as a balance for the middle length classes, had been observed for both the Atlantic (Wagué & M'Bodj, Reference Wagué and M'Bodj2002; Baali et al., Reference Baali, Bourassi, Falah, Abderrazik, Manchih, Amenzoui and Yahyaoui2017; Amenzoui & Baali, Reference Amenzoui and Baali2018; Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020) and the Mediterranean round sardinellas (Tsikliras & Antonopoulou, Reference Tsikliras and Antonopoulou2006).

Sardinella aurita spawns year-round in NW Africa with a maximum period from June to September–December (depending on the area included) (Boëly et al., Reference Boëly, Fréon and Stequert1982; Chesheva, Reference Chesheva2006; Ndiaye et al., Reference Ndiaye, Sarr, Faye, Thiaw, Diouf, Ba, Ndiaye, Lazar and Thiaw2018; Baldé et al., Reference Baldé, Sow, Ba, Ekau, Brehmer, Kantoussan, Fall and Diouf2019; Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020). Conversely the spawning peak observed in the Canary Islands occurs in winter, matching with the breeding periods found in the other small pelagic species caught by the same fleet, i.e. S. colias (Lorenzo & Pajuelo, Reference Lorenzo and Pajuelo1996), Trachurus picturatus (Bowdich, 1825) (Jurado-Ruzafa & Santamaría, Reference Jurado-Ruzafa and Santamaría2013) and S. pilchardus (Méndez-Villamil et al., Reference Méndez-Villamil, Lorenzo, González and Soto1997). The coldest period (i.e. winter) also matches with the main annual upwelling event in the archipelago (De León & Braun, Reference De León and Braun1973; Barton et al., Reference Barton, Arístegui, Tett, Cantón, García-Braun, Hernández-León, Nykjaer, Almeida, Almunia, Ballesteros, Basterretxea, Escánez, García-Weill, Hernández-Guerra, López-Laatzen, Molina, Montero, Navarro-Pérez, Rodríguez, van Lenning, Vélez and Wild1998; Moyano & Hernández-León, Reference Moyano, Hernández-León, Clemmesen, Malzahn, Peck and Schnack2009; Valdés & Déniz-González, Reference Valdés and Déniz-González2015). The coincidence of the spawning peaks with upwelling processes is in line with previous observations on breeding of round sardinellas. It seems synchronized with the major upwelling events in the nearby areas off South Morocco (Amenzoui & Baali, Reference Amenzoui and Baali2018), Mauritania (Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020), or with the period when the sea surface temperature reaches the annual minimum values (Baldé et al., Reference Baldé, Sow, Ba, Ekau, Brehmer, Kantoussan, Fall and Diouf2019). Furthermore, the coincidence of the spawning peaks in the main target species of the fleet (artisanal purse-seines) should be considered as an advantage by the fishery managers who face the huge challenge of managing mixed fisheries (Penas Lado, Reference Penas Lado and Penas Lado2019), as the one addressed in the present study, and even more for a species in expansion in the current climate change scenario (Baudron et al., Reference Baudron, Brunel, Blanchet, Hidalgo, Chust, Brown, Kleisner, Millar, Mackenzie, Nikolioudakis, Fernandes and Fernandes2020). In fact, expansion of species leads to transboundary geographic distributions, which in the case of S. aurita is promoting several projects whose aim is to facilitate collaboration between countries involved to share stocks to achieve the coordinated management programmes in NW Africa, such as the ‘Shared sardinella’ project (FAO, 2022).

The length at first maturity estimated for S. aurita inhabiting the Canary Islands waters (18 cm) is notably smaller than the LFMs estimated in NW African waters (ter Hofstede et al., Reference ter Hofstede, Dickey-Collas, Mantingh and Wague2007; Baali et al., Reference Baali, Yahyaoui, Amenzoui, Manchih and Abderrazik2015, Reference Baali, Bourassi, Falah, Abderrazik, Manchih, Amenzoui and Yahyaoui2017; Amenzoui & Baali, Reference Amenzoui and Baali2018; Ndiaye et al., Reference Ndiaye, Sarr, Faye, Thiaw, Diouf, Ba, Ndiaye, Lazar and Thiaw2018; Jurado-Ruzafa et al., Reference Jurado-Ruzafa, Hernández, Duque-Nogal, Pascual-Alayón, Carrasco, Sancho and Santamaría2020, among others). This is a common result in other small pelagic species, probably due to the more favourable oceanographic conditions in the continental NW African coasts, characterized by the influence of one of the four major upwelling systems of the world (Barton et al., Reference Barton, Arístegui, Tett, Cantón, García-Braun, Hernández-León, Nykjaer, Almeida, Almunia, Ballesteros, Basterretxea, Escánez, García-Weill, Hernández-Guerra, López-Laatzen, Molina, Montero, Navarro-Pérez, Rodríguez, van Lenning, Vélez and Wild1998; Cury et al., Reference Cury, Bakun, Crawford, Jarre, Quiñones, Shannon and Verheye2020). Going deeper into the landings' length frequencies, we can observe the presence of high proportions of juveniles (<18 cm, as in 2016), which could be explained by the absence of legal size limitations for this species, which makes it a perfect bycatch when other more valued and size-limited small pelagics are not found.

Several studies suggest a potential African larvae inflow into Canary Islands waters based on the presence of clupeid larvae in cooler filaments reaching the archipelago and originating in African upwelling areas (Rodríguez et al., Reference Rodríguez, Hernández-León and Barton1999; Moyano, Reference Moyano2009; Moyano & Hernández-León, Reference Moyano, Hernández-León, Clemmesen, Malzahn, Peck and Schnack2009). In the CECAF region, latitudinal differences in seasonal patterns of the demographic composition and reproductive traits in S. aurita have been related to different temperature regimes and food availability (Amenzoui & Baali, Reference Amenzoui and Baali2018). The present study supports the reproductive behaviour complexity of S. aurita described by Whitehead (Reference Whitehead1985), also showing longitudinal differences in the demographic composition and the reproductive biology of S. aurita when compared with the species caught in NW African coasts. In this context, there are several studies discussing the population structure of the species in the CE Atlantic (e.g. Chesheva & Zimin, Reference Chesheva and Zimin2004; Riveiro et al., Reference Riveiro, Guisande, Iglesias, Basilone, Cuttitta, Giráldez, Patti, Mazzola, Bonanno, Vergara and Maneiro2011; Bacha et al., Reference Bacha, Jeyid, Jaafour, Yahyaoui, Diop and Amara2016), but the use of genetic markers indicates low genetic variability for the Atlantic S. aurita (Kinsey et al., Reference Kinsey, Orsoy, Bert and Mahmoudi1994; Chikhi et al., Reference Chikhi, Bonhomme and Agnèse1998; De Donato et al., Reference De Donato, Mimbela de Loroño, Ramírez and Marín2005; Takyi, Reference Takyi2019). Therefore, although the results obtained in the present study strengthen the consideration of the Canary S. aurita as a different management unit than the NW African stock assumed by the CECAF experts group (FAO, 2020), further efforts are needed to describe the actual population structure of the round sardinella, including the whole geographic distribution of the species in the west Atlantic Ocean.

The round sardinella is experiencing an expansion process through latitudes where temperatures are getting warmer due to global warming (Navarro, Reference Navarro1932; Zeeberg et al., Reference Zeeberg, Corten, Tjoe-Awie, Coca and Hamady2008; Amenzoui & Baali, Reference Amenzoui and Baali2018). In the NW African context, where it is considered a valuable protein source (Ba et al., Reference Ba, Schmidt, Dème, Lancker, Chaboud, Cury, Thiao, Diouf and Brehmer2017), from a precautionary approach and based on the limited data available, the assumed one-stock is considered overexploited (FAO, 2020), which should alert the Spanish managers to pay more attention to the Canary sardinellas. The knowledge of the biology of species is crucial to achieving reliable assessment and sound management measures focused on the conservation of the natural resources along with sustainability of the fishing activity. In the critical scenario presented for S. aurita, the updated biological knowledge for this little-known species in the Canary Islands provides the base to address its status assessment and evaluate the management options.

Author contributions

Alba Jurado-Ruzafa: conceived and carried out the study, performed biological sampling and data collation, analysed the data, interpreted the findings and wrote the article. Begoña Sotillo de Olano, Zoraida Santana Arocha, Bertín García Mañé, Clara Estil-las García, Eva Hernández: contributed to samples' acquisition, biological sampling and data collation. All authors discussed the results and commented to the final manuscript.

Financial support

This project was partially funded by the EU through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) within the Spanish National Programme of collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical standards

The research did not involve animal experimentation or harm.

Data availability

Data available on request from the authors.

References

Amenzoui, K and Baali, A (2018) Biological parameters of Sardinella aurita (Valenciennes, 1847) exploited in the Dakhla zone (South Atlantic Morocco). International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 9, 8590.Google Scholar
Arístegui, J, Álvarez-Salgado, XA, Barton, ED, Figueiras, FG, Hernández-León, S, Roy, C and Santos, AMP (2006) Oceanography and fisheries of the Canary currents/Iberian region of the eastern North Atlantic. In Robinson, R and Brink, KH (eds), The Sea. Volume 14B: The Global Coastal Ocean. Interdisciplinary Regional Studies and Syntheses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 878–931.Google Scholar
Ba, A, Schmidt, J, Dème, M, Lancker, K, Chaboud, C, Cury, P, Thiao, D, Diouf, M and Brehmer, P (2017) Profitability and economic drivers of small pelagic fisheries in West Africa: a twenty year perspective. Marine Policy 76, 152158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baali, A, Bourassi, H, Falah, S, Abderrazik, W, Manchih, K, Amenzoui, K and Yahyaoui, A (2017) Reproductive biology of Sardinella sp. (Sardinella aurita and Sardinella maderensis) in the South of Morocco. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 20, 165178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baali, A, Yahyaoui, A, Amenzoui, K, Manchih, K and Abderrazik, W (2015) A preliminary study of reproduction, age and growth of Sardinella aurita (Valenciennes, 1847) in the southern of Atlantic Moroccan area. AACL Bioflux 8, 960974.Google Scholar
Bacha, M, Jeyid, AM, Jaafour, S, Yahyaoui, A, Diop, M and Amara, R (2016) Insights on stock structure of round sardinella Sardinella aurita off north-West Africa based on otolith shape analysis. Journal of Fish Biology 89, 21532166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldé, B, Sow, F, Ba, K, Ekau, W, Brehmer, P, Kantoussan, J, Fall, M and Diouf, M (2019) Variability of key biological parameters of round sardinella Sardinella aurita and the effects of environmental changes. Journal of Fish Biology 94, 391401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, ED, Arístegui, J, Tett, P, Cantón, M, García-Braun, J, Hernández-León, S, Nykjaer, L, Almeida, C, Almunia, J, Ballesteros, S, Basterretxea, G, Escánez, J, García-Weill, L, Hernández-Guerra, A, López-Laatzen, F, Molina, R, Montero, MF, Navarro-Pérez, E, Rodríguez, JM, van Lenning, K, Vélez, H and Wild, K (1998) The transition zone of the Canary Current upwelling region. Progress in Oceanography 41, 455504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudron, A, Brunel, T, Blanchet, M-A, Hidalgo, M, Chust, G, Brown, E, Kleisner, K, Millar, C, Mackenzie, B, Nikolioudakis, N, Fernandes, J and Fernandes, P (2020) Changing fish distributions challenge the effective management of European fisheries. Ecography 42, 112.Google Scholar
Bianchi, G, Carpenter, KE, Roux, J-P, Molloy, FJ, Boyer, D and Boyer, HJ (1999) FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. Field Guide to the Living Marine Resources of Namibia. Rome: FAO, 265 pp.Google Scholar
Boëly, T (1982) Étude du cycle sexuel de la sardinelle ronde (Sardinella aurita Val. 1847) au Sénégal. Océanographie Tropicale 17(1), 313.Google Scholar
Boëly, T, Fréon, P and Stequert, B (1982) La croissance de Sardinella aurita (Val. 1847) au Sénégal. Océanographie Tropicale 17, 103119.Google Scholar
Braun, JG (1980) Estudios de producción en aguas de las Islas Canarias I. Hidrografía, nutrientes y producción primaria. Boletín del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 285(5), 149154.Google Scholar
Chesheva, Z (2006) On the biology of gilt sardine Sardinella aurita (Clupeidae) of the central Eastern Atlantic. Journal of Ichthyology 46, 759767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesheva, ZA and Zimin, AV (2004) The use of otolith measurement for the elucidation of the population structure of round sardinella Sardinella aurita (Clupeidae) from the Central Eastern Atlantic. Journal of Ichthyology 4, 624628.Google Scholar
Chikhi, L, Bonhomme, F and Agnèse, J-F (1998) Low genetic variability in a widely distributed and abundant clupeid species, Sardinella aurita: new empirical results and interpretations. Journal of Fish Biology 52, 861878.Google Scholar
Corten, A, Braham, C-B and Sadegh, AS (2017) The development of a fishmeal industry in Mauritania and its impact on the regional stocks of sardinella and other small pelagics in NorthWest Africa. Fisheries Research 186, 328336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cury, P, Bakun, A, Crawford, RJM, Jarre, A, Quiñones, RA, Shannon, LJ and Verheye, HM (2000) Small pelagics in upwelling systems: patterns of interaction and structural changes in “wasp-waist” ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 603618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Donato, M, Mimbela de Loroño, I, Ramírez, I and Marín, B (2005) Baja diferenciación genética entre poblaciones de sardina, Sardinella aurita, del oriente venezolano. Ciencias marinas 31, 529535.Google Scholar
De León, AR and Braun, JG (1973) Annual cycle of primary production and its relation to nutrients in the Canary Islands waters. Boletín del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 167, 124.Google Scholar
EU (2017) Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the Long Distance Fisheries (RCM LDF) 2017. Hamburg, Germany, 06–08 June 2017. 47 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (2016) Fishery Committee for the Eastern Central Atlantic, Report of the seventh session of the Scientific Sub-Committee, Tenerife, Spain, 14–16 October 2015. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report, 1128. 96 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (2020) Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish of Northwest Africa. Casablanca, Morocco, 8–13 July 2019. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report, 1309. 320 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (2022) “Shared sardinella” project: promoting regional collaboration for sustainable management of the transboundary fishery in Northwest Africa. Available at https://www.fao.org/in-action/eaf-nansen/news-events/detail-events/en/c/1269478/ (Accessed 21 March 2022).Google Scholar
FAO (in press) Report of the FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off Northwest Africa. On-line meeting 21–25 June 2021. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report (tbc).Google Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (eds) (2021) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. Available at www.fishbase.org, version (08/2021) (Accessed 21 March 2022).Google Scholar
Holden, MJ and Raitt, DFS (1975) Manual of Fisheries Science. Part 2 – Methods of Resource Investigation and their Application. FAO Fisheries Technical Papers, 115. 211 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2021) Working Group on Southern Horse Mackerel Anchovy and Sardine (WGHANSA). ICES Scientific Reports 3, 55, 455 pp.Google Scholar
Jennings, S, Kaiser, MJ and Reynolds, JD (2001) Marine Fisheries Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 417 pp.Google Scholar
Jurado-Ruzafa, A, Bartolomé, A, Carrasco, N and Duque-Nogal, V (2016) Length–weight relationships of the most caught small pelagic fish from the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic, Spain). Vieraea 44, 107116.Google Scholar
Jurado-Ruzafa, A, González-Lorenzo, G, Jiménez, S, Sotillo, B, Acosta, C and Santamaría, MTG (2019) Seasonal evolution of small pelagic fish landings index in relation to oceanographic variables in the Canary Islands (Spain). Deep Sea Research II 159, 8491.Google Scholar
Jurado-Ruzafa, A, Hernández, E, Duque-Nogal, V, Pascual-Alayón, PJ, Carrasco, MN, Sancho, A and Santamaría, MTG (2020) Life history parameters of the round sardinella Sardinella aurita in the Central East Atlantic off north-West Africa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 100, 9971009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurado-Ruzafa, A and Santamaría, MTG (2013) Reproductive biology of the blue jack mackerel, Trachurus picturatus (Bowdich, 1825), off the Canary Islands. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 29, 526531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M (2007) Stock structure and abundance. In Fisheries Biology: Assessment and Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 172238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, ST, Orsoy, T, Bert, TM and Mahmoudi, B (1994) Population structure of the Spanish sardine Sardinella aurita: natural morphological variation in a genetically homogeneous population. Marine Biology 118, 309317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, JM and Pajuelo, JG (1996) Growth and reproductive biology of chub mackerel Scomber japonicus off the Canary Islands. South African Journal of Marine Science 17, 275280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Villamil, M, Lorenzo, JM, González, JM and Soto, R (1997) Periodo reproductor y madurez sexual de la sardina Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) en aguas de Gran Canaria (Islas Canarias). Boletín del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 13, 4755.Google Scholar
Moyano, M (2009) Temporal and spatial distribution of the ichthyoplankton in the Canary Islands. Doctoral Thesis, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. 287 pp.Google Scholar
Moyano, M and Hernández-León, S (2009) Temporal and along-shelf distribution of the larval fish assemblage at Gran Canaria, Canary Islands. In Clemmesen, C, Malzahn, AM, Peck, MA and Schnack, D (eds), Advances in Early Life History Study of Fish. Barcelona: Scientia Marina, pp. 8596.Google Scholar
Mustac, B and Sinovcic, G (2012) Inshore vs offshore length distribution of round sardinella (Sardinella aurita) in the middle eastern Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriatic 53, 341350.Google Scholar
Navarro, FP (1932) Nuevos estudios sobre la alacha (Sardinella aurita C. & V.) de Baleares y de Canarias. Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Notas y Resúmenes. Serie II 60, 135.Google Scholar
Ndiaye, I, Sarr, A, Faye, A, Thiaw, M, Diouf, M, Ba, K, Ndiaye, W, Lazar, N and Thiaw, OT (2018) Reproductive biology of round sardinella (Sardinella aurita) (Valenciennes, 1847) in Senegalese coastal waters. Journal of Biology and Life Science 9, 3145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, D (1984) Fish Population Dynamics in Tropical Waters: A Manual for Use with Programmable Calculators. Manila: ICLARM, 325 pp.Google Scholar
Penas Lado, E (2019) The challenge of mixed fisheries. In Penas Lado, E (ed.), Quo Vadis Common Fisheries Policy?. Brussels: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 7190. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119576907.ch4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, JA, Margetts, AR, Hamley, JM and Akyüz, EF (1983) Manual of Methods for Fish Stock Assessment. Part 3 – Selectivity of Fishing Gear. FAO Fisheries Technical Papers, 41. 56 pp.Google Scholar
Quinzán, M and Jurado-Ruzafa, A (in press) Exploratory assessment of small pelagic stocks in the Canary Islands using data-poor methods. In FAO Working Group on the Assessment of Small Pelagic Fish off Northwest Africa. Online meeting, 21–25 June 2021. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report (tbc).Google Scholar
Riveiro, I, Guisande, C, Iglesias, P, Basilone, G, Cuttitta, A, Giráldez, A, Patti, B, Mazzola, S, Bonanno, A, Vergara, A-R and Maneiro, I (2011) Identification of subpopulations in pelagic marine fish species using amino acid composition. Hydrobiologia 670, 189199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, JM, Hernández-León, S and Barton, ED (1999) Mesoscale distribution of fish larvae in relation to an upwelling filament off NorthWest Africa. Deep Sea Research Part I 46, 19691984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatés, A, Martín, P, Lloret, J and Raya, V (2006) Sea warming and fish distribution: the case of the small pelagic fish, Sardinella aurita, in the western Mediterranean. Global Change Biology 12, 22092219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaría, MTG, González, JF, Barrera, A, López Abellán, LJ, Quintero, ME and Balguerías, E (2008) Substitution of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) for round sardinella (Sardinella aurita) in the Canary Islands waters. In Fréon, P, Barange, M and Arístegui, J (eds), Eastern Boundary Upwelling Ecosystems: Integrative and Comparative Approaches. Book of Abstracts. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, p. 213.Google Scholar
Takyi, E (2019) Population genetic structure of Sardinella aurita and Sardinella maderensis in the eastern central Atlantic region (CECAF) in West Africa. Master's Thesis, University of Rhode Island. 54 pp.Google Scholar
ter Hofstede, R, Dickey-Collas, M, Mantingh, IT and Wague, A (2007) The link between migration, the reproductive cycle and condition of Sardinella aurita off Mauritania, north-West Africa. Journal of Fish Biology 71, 12931302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsikliras, AC (2008) Climate-related geographic shift and sudden population increase of a small pelagic fish (Sardinella aurita) in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Marine Biology Research 4, 477481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsikliras, AC and Antonopoulou, E (2006) Reproductive biology of round sardinella (Sardinella aurita) in the north-eastern Mediterranean. Scientia Marina 70, 281290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, L and Déniz-González, I (eds) (2015) Oceanographic and Biological Features in the Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Paris: IOC-UNESCO. IOC Technical Series, 115. 383 pp.Google Scholar
Wagué, A and M'Bodj, OB (2002) Étude de quelques aspects de la reproduction chez la sardinelle ronde Sardinella aurita (Valenciennes, 1847) péchée le long des côtes mauritaniennes. Bulletin Scientifique de l'Institut Mauritanien de Recherches Océanographiques et des Pêches 29, 1318.Google Scholar
Whitehead, PJP (1984) Clupeidae (incl. Dussumieridae). In Whitehead, PJP, Bauchot, M-L, Hureau, J-C, Nielsen, J and Tortonese, E (eds), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, vol. 1. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 268281.Google Scholar
Whitehead, PJP (1985) FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 7. Clupeoid Fishes of the World (suborder Clupeoidei). An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of the Herrings, Sardines, Pilchards, Sprats, Shads, Anchovies and Wolf-herrings. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, 125(7/1): 303 pp.Google Scholar
Zar, JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 718 pp.Google Scholar
Zeeberg, J, Corten, A, Tjoe-Awie, P, Coca, J and Hamady, B (2008) Climate modulates the effects of Sardinella aurita fisheries off NorthWest Africa. Fisheries Research 89, 6575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Study area allocation and name of the eight islands which constitute the Canary Islands archipelago.

Figure 1

Table 1. Descriptive statistics of the round sardinella biologically analysed in the Canary Islands from commercial landings (time period 2013–2019) and LWR estimated for the total and by sex

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Total and annual length frequencies (%) of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands. N, number of fish measured; $\overline {{\rm TL}}$, average total length.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Monthly sex ratios of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019). (*) indicates χ2 values with P > 0.05, meaning balanced sex ratios.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Sex ratios by length class of the S. aurita landings analysed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019). (*) indicates χ2 values with P > 0.05, meaning balanced sex ratios.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Quarterly evolution of the mean values of the gonadosomatic index (GSI) and the total length (TL) of the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Monthly proportions of mature and immature sexual stages of the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019).

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Maturity ogive obtained for the round sardinellas landed in the Canary Islands (time period: 2013–2019).The pi is the mature proportion by length class (Li, cm). R2 is the coefficient of determination when fitting the pi observed by Li to the Gompertz model (resulting formula presented in the graph).