Fixed point theorems involving numerical invariants

Olivier Haution

doi:10.1112/S0010437X18007911

Fixed point theorems involving numerical invariants

Part of: Algebraic groups Cycles and subschemes

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2019

Olivier Haution

Show author details

Olivier Haution*: Affiliation:
Mathematisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Theresienstr. 39, D-80333 München, Germany email [email protected]

Article contents

Abstract
Statement of results
Group actions on varieties
Algebraic cycles
The degree of equivariant cycles
The Euler characteristic of equivariant modules
Browder’s theorem
Footnotes
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

We exhibit invariants of smooth projective algebraic varieties with integer values, whose nonvanishing modulo $p$ prevents the existence of an action without fixed points of certain finite $p$-groups. The case of base fields of characteristic $p$ is included. Counterexamples are systematically provided to test the sharpness of our results.

Keywords

p-group actions fixed points Chern numbers

MSC classification

Primary: 14L30: Group actions on varieties or schemes (quotients) 14C17: Intersection theory, characteristic classes, intersection multiplicities 14C35: Applications of methods of algebraic $K$-theory

Type: Research Article
Information: Compositio Mathematica , Volume 155 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 260 - 288

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X18007911 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This article is distributed with Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Copyright: © The Author 2019

Introduction

Consider a finite $p$ -group $G$ acting on a smooth projective variety $X$ over an algebraically closed field. One of the first questions arising in this situation concerns the existence of fixed points, and finding effective methods to predict their existence is desirable. In this paper we exhibit invariants of the variety which may be used to detect fixed points. Each such invariant has the following key properties.

(a) It depends solely on the intrinsic geometry of the variety $X$ , and not on the particular group action.
(b) It takes values in $\mathbb{Z}$ and is accessible to computation.
(c) If it is prime to $p$ , then the group $G$ must fix a point of the variety $X$ .

It is instructive to start by looking at the case of finite sets, which are precisely zero-dimensional varieties (over a given algebraically closed field). They are classified by their cardinality, a numerical invariant which may be used to detect fixed points: a $p$ -group acting on a finite set of cardinality prime to $p$ must fix a point. A direct generalisation of the cardinality of a finite set to higher-dimensional (possibly singular and nonprojective) varieties is the so-called topological Euler characteristic, an integer $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)$ defined as the alternating sum of the $l$ -adic Betti numbers of $X$ (with compact supports). Much like in the case of finite sets, this invariant satisfies the requirements (a)–(c), provided that the characteristic of the base field differs from $p$ .

In this paper, we restrict ourselves to the consideration of smooth projective varieties. This allows us to use intersection theory to produce more invariants satisfying (a)–(c), and also to include the case of base fields of characteristic $p$ . Perhaps the most natural way to construct a numerical invariant of a smooth projective variety using intersection theory is to take the degree of a product of Chern classes of its tangent bundle. Such invariants are called Chern numbers; they satisfy the requirements (a) and (b). Our first result asserts that they also detect fixed points in the sense of (c), under any of the following additional assumptions:

(i) $G$ is abelian;
(ii) the characteristic of the base field is $p$ ;
(iii) $\dim X<p$ .

Another numerical invariant of a smooth projective variety $X$ is its arithmetic genus $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ . This is not quite a Chern number, but rather a $\mathbb{Q}$ -linear combination of Chern numbers which happens to take integral values on any smooth projective variety (this assertion is a form of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem). The arithmetic genus $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ depends solely on the birational geometry of $X$ . In fact it contains all the birational information obtainable using Chern numbers: any linear combination of Chern numbers which is a birational invariant must be a multiple of the arithmetic genus [Reference FultonFul98, Example 15.12.3(c)]. We prove that the invariant $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ detects fixed points (in the sense of (c) above), under any of the following additional assumptions:

(i^′): $G$ is cyclic;
(ii^′): the characteristic of the base field is $p$ ;
(iii^′): $\dim X<p-1$ .

Under any of the assumptions (i^′), (ii^′) and (iii^′), we prove in fact that the cobordism class of the variety $X$ is divisible by $p$ in the Lazard ring as soon as the group $G$ acts without fixed points on $X$ . This essentially means that fixed points may be detected using any $\mathbb{Q}$ -linear combination of Chern numbers taking integral values on smooth projective varieties, and not just the arithmetic genus.

The results are stated in more details in § 1, where we also give an algebraic version of a theorem of Browder in topology [Reference BrowderBro87] concerning the pull-back of fixed points under maps of degree prime to $p$ . The rest of the paper is written using the language of algebraic groups. This allows us to prove more general statements (by including in particular infinitesimal groups in characteristic $p$ ), but also makes some arguments more transparent. For instance the conditions (i) and (ii) appear as special cases of the condition that the $p$ -group $G$ be trigonalisable.

A notable tool introduced in § 3.4 is a cohomology theory that we denote by $K_{G}$ , which lies between the equivariant and usual $K_{0}$ -theory. It is built using a variant of Borel’s construction, where roughly speaking the space $EG$ is replaced by its generic point. The same construction may be applied to other cohomology theories (such as the Chow group), yielding a theory which keeps track of some of the equivariant information while being smaller than the Borel-type equivariant theory.

Even though these results are, in our view, principally of geometric nature, they also have an arithmetic component. Indeed our methods permit in some cases the detection of closed fixed points of degree prime to $p$ , when the base field is not algebraically closed. This is so for Chern numbers (assuming that the base field contains enough roots of unity in case (i)), or the arithmetic genus in case (iii^′). Strikingly, this does not work for the arithmetic genus in case (i^′), nor in case (ii^′) over an imperfect base field (see Examples 5.1.6 and 5.1.7 for counterexamples). This suggests a difference of nature between these situations, and may provide a reason for the absence of a uniform proof for the cases (i^′) and (iii^′).

1 Statement of results

Here we summarise the main results of the paper. In order to make the statements as simple as possible, we assume in this section that $G$ is an ordinary finite $p$ -group and that the base field $k$ is algebraically closed. A $G$ -action on a ( $k$ -)variety $X$ is a group morphism $G\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}_{k}(X)$ . A coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is called $G$ -equivariant if it is endowed with isomorphisms $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{g}:g^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow {\mathcal{F}}$ for $g\in G$ , satisfying the cocycle condition $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{h}\circ h^{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{g})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}_{gh}$ for every $g,h\in G$ .

1.1 Equivariant cycles and Chern numbers

In the next statement $\operatorname{CH}_{G}$ denotes the equivariant Chow group of [Reference Edidin and GrahamEG98].

Theorem 1.1.1. Let $X$ be a projective variety with an action of $G$ . Assume that one of the following conditions holds:

(i) $G$ is abelian;
(ii) $\operatorname{char}k=p$ ;
(iii) $\dim X<p-1$ .

Then $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ if and only if every element of the image of the morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ has degree divisible by $p$ .

Proof. The class of a fixed closed point belongs to $\operatorname{im}(\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X))$ and has degree one. The converse follows from Theorem 4.4 in cases (i) and (ii), since $G$ is trigonalisable (see § 2.1.5), and from Theorem 5.2.3(ii) in case (iii).◻

A Chern number of a smooth projective variety is the degree of a product of Chern classes (with values in the Chow group) of its tangent bundle.

Corollary 1.1.2. Let $X$ be a smooth projective variety with an action of $G$ . Assume that one of the following conditions holds:

(i) $G$ is abelian;
(ii) $\operatorname{char}k=p$ ;
(iii) $\dim X<p$ .

If $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ , then every Chern number of $X$ is divisible by $p$ .

Proof. By [Reference Edidin and GrahamEG98, §2.4] any $G$ -equivariant vector bundle over $X$ (i.e. a vector bundle whose ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module of sections is $G$ -equivariant) admits Chern classes with values in $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ mapping under the forgetful morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ to its usual Chern classes. Since the tangent bundle of $X$ is $G$ -equivariant (see Remark 2.4.8), the result follows from Theorem 1.1.1 in cases (i) and (ii) (or when $\dim X<p-1$ ). In case (iii), the result may also be deduced from Theorem 1.1.1, albeit less directly, see Theorem 5.2.3(iii).◻

Counterexamples show that the conditions of the theorem, and of the corollary in case $p\neq 2$ , are sharp, see Example 4.5 below. The dimensional bound (iii) in the corollary may however be improved when $p=2$ , see Remark 1.1.4.

Remark 1.1.3. The following statement may be found in [Reference SerreSer09, §7.2]: assume that $\operatorname{char}k\neq p$ , and let $X$ be a variety with an action of $G$ . If the topological Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)$ is prime to $p$ , then $X(k)^{G}\neq \varnothing$ .

The assumption on the characteristic of $k$ is necessary: the group $\mathbb{Z}/p$ acts without fixed points on $\mathbb{A}^{1}$ by $x\mapsto x+1$ in characteristic $p$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\mathbb{A}^{1})=1$ . Note that when $X$ is smooth projective of pure dimension $d$ , the integer $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)=\deg c_{d}(T_{X})$ is a Chern number of $X$ . It thus follows from Corollary 1.1.2(ii) that the above statement is in fact valid in characteristic $p$ when $X$ is smooth and projective.

Remark 1.1.4. Let us now comment on the situation in Corollary 1.1.2 when $p=2$ and $X$ has small pure dimension. We denote the Chern number $\deg c_{i_{1}}(T_{X})\cdots c_{i_{n}}(T_{X})$ by $c_{i_{1}}\cdots c_{i_{n}}$ .

— $\dim X=1$ : The only Chern number $c_{1}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)=2\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ is even. Thus Corollary 1.1.2 says nothing for curves when $p=2$ .

— $\dim X=2$ : The two Chern numbers $c_{2}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)$ and $c_{1}^{2}$ have the same parity by Noether’s formula $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)+c_{1}^{2}=12\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ (see e.g. [Reference FultonFul98, Example 15.2]). Thus Corollary 1.1.2 reduces to the statement in Remark 1.1.3 for surfaces when $p=2$ .

— $\dim X=3$ : We have by the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem (see e.g. [Reference FultonFul98, Example 15.2.5(a)])

$$\begin{eqnarray}c_{1}c_{2}=24\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})\quad \text{and}\quad c_{1}c_{2}+4c_{1}^{3}=8\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{X}^{\vee }),\end{eqnarray}$$

so that the two Chern numbers $c_{1}c_{2}$ and $c_{1}^{3}$ are even. The other Chern number $c_{3}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X)$ is also even (for instance by Poincaré duality for $l$ -adic cohomology). Thus Corollary 1.1.2 says nothing for threefolds when $p=2$ .

Summarising, we see that the condition (iii) of Corollary 1.1.2 may be weakened to the condition ‘ $\dim X<4$ ’ when $p=2$ . This new dimensional bound is sharp, see Example 4.5.

1.2 Equivariant modules and the cobordism ring

Theorem 1.2.1. Let $X$ be a projective variety with an action of $G$ . Assume that one of the following conditions holds:

(i) $G$ is cyclic;
(ii) $\operatorname{char}k=p$ ;
(iii) $\dim X<p-1$ .

Then $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ if and only if the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of every $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is divisible by $p$ .

Proof. If ${\mathcal{I}}$ is the ideal in ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ of a fixed closed point, then the ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}/{\mathcal{I}}$ is $G$ -equivariant and satisfies $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X}/{\mathcal{I}})=1$ . The converse is proved respectively in Theorems 5.1.1, 5.3.1 and 5.2.3(i).◻

The sharpness of the conditions of the theorem is illustrated by Example 5.1.5 below.

Let us declare two smooth projective varieties equivalent if their collections of Chern numbers (indexed by the monomials in the Chern classes) coincide. The disjoint union operation endows the set of equivalence classes with the structure of a cancellative abelian monoid. Its group completionFootnote ¹ has a ring structure, where the product is induced by the cartesian product of varieties. This ring does not depend on the field $k$ , in fact Merkurjev proved that it coincides with the Lazard ring $\mathbb{L}$ , the coefficient ring of the universal commutative one-dimensional formal group law [Reference MerkurjevMer02, Theorem 8.2]. Thus to each smooth projective variety $X$ corresponds a class $[X]\in \mathbb{L}$ . When the characteristic of $k$ is zero, the ring $\mathbb{L}$ may be identified with the coefficient ring $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FA}(\operatorname{Spec}k)$ of the algebraic cobordism of Levine-Morel, and $[X]$ is the cobordism class of the morphism $X\rightarrow \operatorname{Spec}k$ [Reference Levine and MorelLM07, Remark 4.3.4, Theorem 4.3.7].

Corollary 1.2.2. In the conditions of Theorem 1.2.1, assume additionally that $X$ is smooth. If $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ , then $[X]\in p\mathbb{L}$ .

Proof. The sheaf of sections of the tangent bundle $T_{X}$ is a $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module (see Remark 2.4.8). The corollary thus follows from Theorem 1.2.1, in view of the Hattori–Stong theorem, see [Reference Esnault, Levine and WittenbergELW15, Lemma 5.4, Proposition 5.5]. In case (iii), this is also a consequence of Theorem 1.1.1: indeed one may see using [Reference AdamsAda74, II, Theorem 7.8, Lemma 7.9(iii)] that the class of a smooth projective variety of dimension ${<}p-1$ is divisible by $p$ in $\mathbb{L}$ if and only if each of its Chern numbers is divisible by $p$ .◻

Remark 1.2.3 (Corollary 1.2.2 has a converse).

If the group $G$ is nontrivial, then $p\mathbb{L}$ consists of classes of smooth projective varieties $X$ admitting a $G$ -action such that $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ . Indeed, we may find a subgroup $H\subset G$ of index $p$ . Then $G$ acts without fixed points on the set $G/H$ , whose cardinality is $p$ . Thus, given any smooth projective variety $Y$ , we may make $G$ act without fixed point on $X=Y^{\sqcup p}$ by permuting the copies of $Y$ .

Remark 1.2.4. Fixed points were known to exist under the assumption that $X$ is connected and $H^{i}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=0$ for $i>0$ : in characteristic $p$ this follows from Smith theory and the Artin–Schreier sequence [Reference SerreSer09, §7.4, Remark]; the cyclic case in characteristic $\neq p$ follows from the Lefschetz fixed point formula [Reference Fulton and LangFL85, VI §9]. Let us also mention a fixed point theorem of Kollár for smooth projective separably rationally connected varieties [Reference StarrSta09, Corollary 3.36].

Since the ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ admits a natural $G$ -equivariant structure, Theorem 1.2.1 implies that a projective variety $X$ has a fixed point under the weaker assumption that the arithmetic genus $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ is prime to $p$ . By contrast to the above-mentioned results, this applies to singular varieties, and also to some smooth projective varieties which are not ‘rational-like’, such as curves of genus two.

1.3 Browder’s theorem

The next statement is an analog of a theorem of Browder in topology [Reference BrowderBro87].

Theorem 1.3.1. Let $f:Y\rightarrow X$ be a projective surjective $G$ -equivariant morphism, where $X$ is smooth and connected, and $Y$ is integral. Assume that $[k(Y):k(X)]$ is finite and prime to $p$ , and that one of the following conditions holds:

(i) $G$ is abelian;
(ii) $\operatorname{char}k=p$ ;
(iii) $\dim X<p$ .

Then the induced morphism $f^{G}:Y^{G}\rightarrow X^{G}$ is surjective.

Proof. See Theorem 6.1 (and Remark 6.2(i) and § 2.1.5). Observe that the last condition implies that the fibers of $f$ all have dimension ${<}p-1$ , since $f$ is a dominant morphism between integral varieties of the same dimension.◻

When $\operatorname{char}k\neq p$ , we prove in fact that the $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ -module $H(X^{G})$ is a direct summand of $H(Y^{G})$ , for any $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ -linear cohomology theory $H$ satisfying the projection formula, for instance $H=\operatorname{CH}(-)\,\otimes \,\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ (see Remark 6.2(iii)).

Remark 1.3.2. A different method is used by Kollár and Szabó in [Reference Reichstein and YoussinRY00] to treat questions of similar nature. In particular, the fact that $X(k)^{G}\neq \varnothing$ implies that $Y(k)^{G}\neq \varnothing$ under the condition Theorem 1.3.1(i) was already stated and proved in [Reference Reichstein and YoussinRY00, Proposition A4].

2 Group actions on varieties

A variety will be a separated scheme of finite type over $k$ with the property that every finite family of points is contained in some affine open subscheme. In particular quasi-projective schemes over $k$ will be considered varieties, and quotients of varieties by finite algebraic groups will remain varieties (see § 2.2.3). Products of varieties will be understood as cartesian products over $k$ . Morphisms of varieties will be $k$ -morphisms; unless otherwise stated a morphism will mean a morphism of varieties. If $X$ is a variety and $R$ a $k$ -algebra, the set of $k$ -morphisms $\operatorname{Spec}R\rightarrow X$ will be denoted by $X(R)$ . The residue field at a point $x\in X$ will be denoted by $k(x)$ .

2.1 Algebraic groups

We refer e.g. to [Reference Mumford, Fogarty and KirwanMFK94, ch. 0, §1] for the basic definitions concerning algebraic groups and their actions. An algebraic group will mean an affine group scheme of finite type over $k$ . When $Y$ and $X$ are two varieties with a $G$ -action, we always will endow the product $X\times Y$ with the diagonal $G$ -action.

2.1.1 The order of a group

The order of an algebraic group $G$ is the dimension of the $k$ -vector space $H^{0}(G,{\mathcal{O}}_{G})$ . An algebraic group is called a $p$ -group if its order is (finite and) a power of the prime $p$ . When $G$ is finite, the order of a subgroup $H$ of $G$ divides the order of $G$ ; this follows from the fact that the quotient morphism $G\rightarrow G/H$ is flat and finite of degree equal to the order of $H$ (see Proposition 2.3.2).

2.1.2 Constant finite groups

Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ be an ordinary finite group. Then there exists an algebraic group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}(R)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ for any connected commutative $k$ -algebra $R$ . The order of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}$ coincides with the order of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ . If $G$ is an algebraic group and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ is a subgroup of $G(k)$ , then the constant group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}$ is a subgroup of $G$ .

2.1.3 Diagonalisable groups

(See [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, §4.4]) A diagonalisable group $G$ is entirely determined by its character group $\widehat{G}$ , an ordinary abelian group. The order of $G$ coincides with the order of $\widehat{G}$ .

When $n$ is a positive integer, the functor assigning to a commutative $k$ -algebra $R$ the multiplicative group consisting of those $x\in R$ such that $x^{n}=1$ is represented by the diagonalisable group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{n}$ satisfying $\widehat{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{n}}=\mathbb{Z}/n$ . When $k$ contains a root of unity order $n$ , the algebraic group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{n}$ is isomorphic to the constant group $(\mathbb{Z}/n)_{k}$ .

There is an anti-equivalence between the category of affine varieties with a $G$ -action and that of commutative $\widehat{G}$ -graded $k$ -algebras of finite type [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, 4.7.3.1].

2.1.4 Unipotent groups

An algebraic group $G$ is called unipotent if every nonzero $G$ -representation over $k$ admits a nonzero trivial subrepresentation. Constant finite $p$ -groups over a field of characteristic $p$ are unipotent.

When $k$ has positive characteristic $p$ , the functor assigning to a commutative $k$ -algebra $R$ the additive group consisting of those $x\in R$ such that $x^{p}=0$ is represented by a unipotent group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}$ , whose order is $p$ .

2.1.5 Trigonalisable groups

An algebraic group $G$ is called trigonalisable if every nonzero $G$ -representation over $k$ admits a subrepresentation of codimension one. It is equivalent to require that $G$ contain a normal unipotent subgroup $U$ such that $G/U$ is diagonalisable [Reference Demazure and GabrielDG70, IV, §2, Proposition 3.4].

A finite constant group $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}$ is trigonalisable in each of the following cases.

– The ordinary group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ is abelian, and $k$ contains a root of unity of order equal to the exponent of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ (the group $G$ is diagonalisable, see [Reference HautionHau16, Lemma 3.6.1]).
– The field $k$ has characteristic $p>0$ , and $G$ is a $p$ -group (it is then unipotent).

2.2 Fixed locus and quotient

2.2.1 Invariant subschemes

Let $X$ be a variety with an action of an algebraic group $G$ . A closed (respectively An open) subscheme $S$ of $X$ is called $G$ -invariant if the composite morphism $G\times S\rightarrow G\times X\rightarrow X$ factors through $S\rightarrow X$ . Note that the scheme theoretic image of a $G$ -equivariant morphism is a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme.

2.2.2 Fixed locus

By [Reference Conrad, Gabber and PrasadCGP15, Proposition A.8.10(1)] there is a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme $X^{G}$ of $X$ with trivial $G$ -action, such that for any variety $T$ with trivial $G$ -action, the set of $G$ -equivariant morphisms $T\rightarrow X$ coincides with the set of morphisms $T\rightarrow X^{G}$ (as subsets of $\operatorname{Hom}(T,X)$ ). When $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{k}$ for an ordinary finite group $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}$ , a $G$ -action is precisely a group morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}_{k}(X)$ , and $X^{G}(k)=X(k)^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}}$ .

2.2.3 Quotient

When it exists, we denote by $X\rightarrow X/G$ the categorical quotient morphism, defined as the coequaliser of the two morphisms $G\times X\rightarrow X$ (the action and the second projection). This morphism always exists in the category of varieties when $G$ is a finite algebraic group (see [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , V, Théorème 4.1(i)]). A $G$ -action on an affine scheme $X=\operatorname{Spec}A$ is given by a $k$ -algebra morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}:A\rightarrow A\otimes _{k}R$ , where $R=H^{0}(G,{\mathcal{O}}_{G})$ . The set

(2.2a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}A^{G}=\{x\in A\mid \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}(x)=x\,\otimes \,1\in A\otimes _{k}R\}\end{eqnarray}$$

is a $k$ -subalgebra of $A$ , and the morphism $X\rightarrow X/G$ is given by the inclusion $A^{G}\rightarrow A$ .

2.2.4

When $H$ is a finite normal subgroup of $G$ , the variety $X/H$ inherits a $G/H$ -action making the quotient morphism $X\rightarrow X/H$ a $G$ -equivariant morphism.

Lemma 2.2.5. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . Then the morphism $X^{G}\rightarrow X/G$ is radicial.

Proof. We may assume that $X=\operatorname{Spec}A$ and that $k$ is infinite. Let $R$ be the coordinate ring of $G$ . Denote by $m:R\rightarrow R\,\otimes \,R$ the co-multiplication morphism (tensor products are taken over $k$ ) and by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}:A\rightarrow A\,\otimes \,R$ be the co-action morphism. Then we have

(2.2b)

$$\begin{eqnarray}(\operatorname{id}_{A}\,\otimes \,m)\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}\,\otimes \,\operatorname{id}_{R})\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}.\end{eqnarray}$$

When $C$ is a $k$ -algebra, we denote by $N_{C}:C\,\otimes \,R\rightarrow C$ the norm, which maps $x\in C\,\otimes \,R$ to the determinant of the $C$ -linear morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{x}:C\,\otimes \,R\rightarrow C\,\otimes \,R$ given by multiplication with $x$ . If $h:C\rightarrow C^{\prime }$ is a $k$ -algebra morphism, then

(2.2c)

$$\begin{eqnarray}h\circ N_{C}=N_{C^{\prime }}\circ (h\,\otimes \,\operatorname{id}_{R}).\end{eqnarray}$$

The morphism $G\times G\rightarrow G\times G$ given by $(g,h)\mapsto (g,g^{-1}h)$ is an automorphism and is compatible with the first projection. Therefore the corresponding ring endomorphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}$ of $R\,\otimes \,R$ is an $R$ -algebra automorphism, for the algebra structure given by $\operatorname{id}_{R}\,\otimes \,1:R\rightarrow R\,\otimes \,R$ . Thus for $x\in A\,\otimes \,R\,\otimes \,R$ , we have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{(\operatorname{id}_{A}\,\otimes \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D711})(x)}=(\operatorname{id}_{A}\,\otimes \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D711})\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{x}\circ (\operatorname{id}_{A}\,\otimes \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D711})^{-1}$ , and taking determinants we obtain

(2.2d)

$$\begin{eqnarray}N_{A\,\otimes \,R}\circ (\operatorname{id}_{A}\,\otimes \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D711})=N_{A\,\otimes \,R}.\end{eqnarray}$$

In addition, the composite of the above automorphism $G\times G\rightarrow G\times G$ with the multiplication map of $G$ is the second projection, so that

(2.2e)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}\circ m=1\,\otimes \,\operatorname{id}_{R}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Since

the map $N_{A}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}:A\rightarrow A$ factors through a map $N:A\rightarrow A^{G}$ (see (2.2a)).

When $K$ is a field containing $k$ , any element of $X^{G}(K)$ is given by a $G$ -equivariant morphism $\operatorname{Spec}K\rightarrow X$ for the trivial $G$ -action on $K$ . Let $f:A\rightarrow K$ be the corresponding $k$ -algebra morphism. Then for any $x\in A$ , by (2.2c) we have

(2.2f)

$$\begin{eqnarray}f\circ N_{A}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}(x)=N_{K}\circ (f\,\otimes \,\operatorname{id}_{R})\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}(x)=N_{K}(f(x)\,\otimes \,1)=f(x)^{n},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $n=\dim _{k}R$ is the order of $G$ .

Now let $f_{1},f_{2}:A\rightarrow K$ be the $k$ -algebra morphisms corresponding to a pair of elements of $X^{G}(K)$ mapping to the same element in $(X/G)(K)$ . Then the restriction of $f_{i}$ to $A^{G}$ does not depend on $i$ . It follows that the map

$$\begin{eqnarray}f_{i}\circ N_{A}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}=f_{i}|_{A^{G}}\circ N\end{eqnarray}$$

does not depend on $i$ . In view of (2.2f), we have in $K$ , for any $x\in A$

$$\begin{eqnarray}f_{1}(x)^{n}=f_{2}(x)^{n}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Writing $n=p^{m}q$ , where $p$ is the characteristic exponent of $k$ and $q$ is prime to $p$ , we obtain in $K$ , for any $x\in A$ ,

$$\begin{eqnarray}f_{1}(x)^{q}=f_{2}(x)^{q}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Now let $a\in A$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}\in k$ . The above equality for $x=a+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}$ yields

$$\begin{eqnarray}(f_{1}(a)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})^{q}=(f_{1}(a+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}))^{q}=(f_{2}(a+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}))^{q}=(f_{2}(a)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})^{q},\end{eqnarray}$$

so that any element of $k\subset K$ is a root of the polynomial

$$\begin{eqnarray}(f_{1}(a)+X)^{q}-(f_{2}(a)+X)^{q}\in K[X],\end{eqnarray}$$

which must therefore vanish (as $k$ is infinite). Its coefficient at $X^{q-1}$ is

$$\begin{eqnarray}q\cdot f_{1}(a)-q\cdot f_{2}(a).\end{eqnarray}$$

Since $q$ is invertible in $k$ , we conclude that $f_{1}=f_{2}$ .◻

2.3 Free actions

Definition 2.3.1. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . The group $G$ acts freely on $X$ if the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}:G\times X\rightarrow X\times X$ given by $(g,x)\mapsto (g\cdot x,x)$ is a monomorphism. It is equivalent to require that for every variety $B$ and $x\in X(B)$ the set of those $g\in G(B)$ such that $g\cdot x=x$ be reduced to the unit element $1\in G(B)$ .

Proposition 2.3.2. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting freely on a variety $X$ . Then the quotient morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/G$ is flat and finite of degree equal to the order of $G$ , and the following square is cartesian, where the unlabelled arrows denote respectively the second projection and the action morphism.

Proof. See [Reference MumfordMum08, §12, Theorem 1(B)], or [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , V, Théorème 4.1(iv)]. ◻

Lemma 2.3.3. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting freely on a variety $X$ . Let $X^{\prime }\rightarrow X$ be a $G$ -equivariant morphism. Then $G$ acts freely on $X^{\prime }$ , and the following square is cartesian.

Proof. The first statement follows from the definition of a free action in terms of functors of points. To prove that the square is cartesian, by descent and Proposition 2.3.2 we may assume that $X=G\times S$ , where $G$ acts trivially on $S$ . Let $S^{\prime }=X^{\prime }/G$ . We need to prove that the $G$ -equivariant $S^{\prime }$ -morphism $X^{\prime }\rightarrow G\times S^{\prime }$ is an isomorphism. To do so, by descent and Proposition 2.3.2 we may assume that $X^{\prime }=G\times S^{\prime }$ . But any equivariant $S^{\prime }$ -endomorphism of an $S^{\prime }$ -group scheme coincides with multiplication by the image of the unit, hence must be an isomorphism.◻

Lemma 2.3.4. Let $G$ be an algebraic group of prime order acting on a variety $X$ . If $X^{G}=\varnothing$ , then the action is free.

Proof. For a $k$ -scheme $F$ and $x,y\in X(F)$ , we denote by $S_{x,y}$ the fiber of the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}:G\times X\rightarrow X\times X$ over $(x,y):F\rightarrow X\times X$ . Let us write $G_{F}=G\times F$ and $X_{F}=X\times F$ . For any $k$ -scheme $E$ , the set $S_{x,y}(E)$ may be identified with the subset of $G_{F}(E)$ consisting of those $g$ such that $g\cdot y=x\in X(E)$ . In particular $S_{x,x}$ is a subgroup of the $F$ -group scheme $G_{F}$ (the stabiliser of $x$ ), and the $F$ -scheme $S_{x,y}$ is isomorphic to $S_{x,x}$ as soon as $S_{x,y}(F)\neq \varnothing$ .

We now prove the statement. The morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}:G\times X\rightarrow X\times X$ being proper, by [Reference GrothendieckEGAIV₃ , (8.11.5)] it will suffice to prove that $S_{x,y}\rightarrow F$ is either empty or an isomorphism, when $F=\operatorname{Spec}K$ for an algebraically closed field $K$ containing $k$ , and $x,y\in X(F)$ . Assume that $S_{x,y}$ is nonempty. Then the finite type $K$ -scheme $S_{x,y}$ possesses a rational point. It follows from the discussion above that the $F$ -scheme $S_{x,y}$ is isomorphic to the subgroup $S_{x,x}$ of $G_{F}$ . But the $K$ -group scheme $G_{F}$ has exactly two subgroups (the order of a subgroup must divide its order). If $S_{x,x}=G_{F}$ , then the morphism $x:F\rightarrow X$ is $G$ -equivariant for the trivial action on $F$ , hence factors through $X^{G}$ ; this would contradict the assumption that $X^{G}=\varnothing$ . Thus the $K$ -group scheme $S_{x,x}$ is trivial, and $S_{x,y}\rightarrow F$ is an isomorphism.◻

2.4 Equivariant modules

Definition 2.4.1. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ , and ${\mathcal{F}}$ a quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module. A $G$ -equivariant structure on ${\mathcal{F}}$ is an isomorphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}:a^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow p^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}$ , where $a,p:G\times X\rightarrow X$ are respectively the action morphism and the second projection, making the following diagram commute

(2.4a)

where $q:G\,\times \,G\,\times \,X\rightarrow G\,\times \,X$ is the projection on the last two factors, and $m:G\,\times \,G\,\times \,X\rightarrow G\times X$ is the base-change of the multiplication map of $G$ . We will often omit to mention the isomorphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}$ , and simply say that ${\mathcal{F}}$ is a $G$ -equivariant quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module. This is the same definition as [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, §6.5], where the cocycle condition is instead expressed in terms of the inverse $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}$ of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}$ . We will say that a vector bundle is $G$ -equivariant when its sheaf of sections is a $G$ -equivariant module.

Let ${\mathcal{F}}$ and ${\mathcal{G}}$ be two $G$ -equivariant quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules. A morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}:{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow {\mathcal{G}}$ of ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules will be called $G$ -equivariant if the following diagram commutes.

This defines a category ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ . The category ${\mathcal{M}}(\operatorname{Spec}k;G)$ (for the trivial $G$ -action on $\operatorname{Spec}k$ ) is the category of $G$ -representations over $k$ . A $G$ -equivariant morphism $f:Y\rightarrow X$ induces functors $f^{\ast }:{\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(Y;G)$ (see [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, Lemme 6.3.1]) and $\operatorname{R}^{i}f_{\ast }:{\mathcal{M}}(Y;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ for every $i$ (the proof of [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, Lemme 6.6.1] also works for higher direct images).

2.4.2

A morphism of algebraic groups $H\rightarrow G$ induces a functor ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(X;H)$ . The category ${\mathcal{M}}(X;1)$ coincides with the category of quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules.

2.4.3

If ${\mathcal{F}}$ is a quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module, any $G$ -equivariant structure $a^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow p^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}$ is a $G$ -equivariant morphism. Thus we may define a morphism $a^{\ast }\rightarrow p^{\ast }$ of functors ${\mathcal{M}}(G\times X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(G\times X;G)$ .

2.4.4

If a diagonalisable group $G$ acts trivially on a variety $X$ , and ${\mathcal{F}}$ is a quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module, a $G$ -equivariant structure on ${\mathcal{F}}$ is the same thing as a $\widehat{G}$ -grading on the ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ , i.e. a direct sum decomposition ${\mathcal{F}}=\bigoplus _{g\in \widehat{G}}{\mathcal{F}}_{g}$ (see [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , I, 4.7.3]).

Lemma 2.4.5. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ , and $D$ a central diagonalisable subgroup of $G$ acting trivially on $X$ . Let ${\mathcal{F}}$ be a $G$ -equivariant quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module. Then the $\widehat{D}$ -grading of the ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ lifts to the category ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ .

Proof. We denote by $a,p:G\times X\rightarrow X$ the action and projection morphisms, and by $d:D\times X\rightarrow X$ their common restriction. Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}:G\times D\times X\rightarrow D\times X$ the base-changes of $a,p$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}:G\times D\times X\rightarrow G\times X$ the base-change of $d$ . Let $m:G\times D\times X\rightarrow G\times X$ be the multiplication morphism. Let $s:G\times D\times X\rightarrow D\times G\times X$ the exchange morphism, and write $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\prime }=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\circ s^{-1}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{\prime }=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\circ s^{-1}$ . Since $D$ is central, the multiplication morphism $m^{\prime }:D\times G\times X\rightarrow G\times X$ coincides with $m\circ s^{-1}$ .

Denote by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}:a^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow p^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}$ the $G$ -equivariant structure, and by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}:d^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow d^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}$ the induced $D$ -equivariant structure. Using the commutativity of (2.4a) twice, we see that the following diagram commutes.

We let $D$ act on $G\times X$ via the trivial action on $G$ . Then the morphisms $a,p:G\times X\rightarrow X$ are $D$ -equivariant (since $D$ is central). The commutativity of the exterior rectangle asserts that the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}$ is $D$ -equivariant, and the lemma follows.◻

Definition 2.4.6. Let $X$ be a variety with an action of $G$ , and $H$ a normal subgroup of $G$ acting trivially on $X$ . We let $G$ act on $H$ by $(g,h)\mapsto ghg^{-1}$ . The second projection $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}:H\times X\rightarrow X$ is $G$ -equivariant, and coincides with the action morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}:H\times X\rightarrow X$ . The category ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G/H)$ may be identified with the full subcategory of ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ consisting of those objects ${\mathcal{F}}$ on which $H$ acts trivially, i.e. such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}$ is the identity. Consider the two morphisms $\operatorname{id}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }$ of functors ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ , respectively adjoint to the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\ast }\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }$ (see § 2.4.3) and the identity of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }$ . Their equaliser defines a morphism

$$\begin{eqnarray}(-)^{H}:{\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(X;G/H).\end{eqnarray}$$

2.4.7

In the conditions of Definition 2.4.6, let ${\mathcal{F}}\in {\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ and let $U$ be an open subscheme of $X$ . Since taking the sections over $U$ is a left exact functor ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(\operatorname{Spec}k;G)$ , it follows that ${\mathcal{F}}^{H}(U)={\mathcal{F}}(U)^{H}$ .

2.4.8

The ideal of a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme is naturally $G$ -equivariant. Using this observation for the diagonal immersion $X\rightarrow X\times X$ and pulling back to $X$ , we deduce that the cotangent module of $X$ is $G$ -equivariant. Thus if $X$ is smooth, its tangent bundle is $G$ -equivariant.

Proposition 2.4.9. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . Let $H$ be a finite normal subgroup of $G$ acting freely on $X$ , and denote by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/H$ the quotient morphism. Then the composite

$$\begin{eqnarray}{\mathcal{M}}(X/H;G/H)\subset {\mathcal{M}}(X/H;G)\xrightarrow[{}]{\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }}{\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\end{eqnarray}$$

is an equivalence of categories, with quasi-inverse

$$\begin{eqnarray}{\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\xrightarrow[{}]{\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }}{\mathcal{M}}(X/H;G)\xrightarrow[{}]{(-)^{H}}{\mathcal{M}}(X/H;G/H).\end{eqnarray}$$

These equivalences preserve the full subcategories of coherent, respectively locally free coherent, equivariant modules.

Proof. Consider the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }((\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(-))^{H})\rightarrow \operatorname{id}$ of functors ${\mathcal{M}}(X;G)\rightarrow {\mathcal{M}}(X;G)$ which is adjoint to the natural morphism $(\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(-))^{H}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(-)$ . It will suffice to prove that for every $G$ -equivariant quasi-coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ , the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }((\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }({\mathcal{F}}))^{H})\rightarrow {\mathcal{F}}$ is an isomorphism of ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules (its inverse is then automatically $G$ -equivariant). But this follows from descent theory: in view of Proposition 2.3.2, the $H$ -equivariant structure on ${\mathcal{F}}$ is precisely a descent datum with respect to the faithfully flat morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}$ .◻

3 Algebraic cycles

3.1 Grothendieck groups

3.1.1

Let $X$ be a noetherian separated scheme. We denote by $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ (respectively $K_{0}(X)$ ) the Grothendieck group (respectively ring) of coherent (respectively locally free coherent) ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules. The class of an ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ will be denoted by $[{\mathcal{F}}]$ . The tensor product induces a $K_{0}(X)$ -module structure on $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ . A proper, respectively flat, morphism $f:Y\rightarrow X$ induces a push-forward morphism $f_{\ast }:K_{0}^{\prime }(Y)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ , respectively pull-back morphism $f^{\ast }:K_{0}^{\prime }(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(Y)$ .

3.1.2

A filtration is defined by letting $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)_{(n)}$ be the subgroup of $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ generated by images of the push-forward morphisms $K_{0}^{\prime }(Z)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ , where $Z$ runs over the closed subschemes of $X$ of dimension less than or equal to $n$ . This filtration is compatible with push-forward morphisms [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, X, Proposition 1.1.8]. If $f:Y\rightarrow X$ is a flat morphism of relative dimension $d$ , then $f^{\ast }K_{0}^{\prime }(X)_{(n)}\subset K_{0}^{\prime }(Y)_{(n+d)}$ (see [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, X, §3.3]).

3.1.3

When $X$ is a complete variety, we denote by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,-):K_{0}^{\prime }(X)\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ the push-forward morphism along the structural morphism $X\rightarrow \operatorname{Spec}k$ . This is the unique morphism sending the class of a coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ to its Euler characteristic

(3.1a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})=\mathop{\sum }_{i=0}^{\dim X}\dim _{k}H^{i}(X,{\mathcal{F}}).\end{eqnarray}$$

3.1.4

Now let $X$ be a variety with an action of an algebraic group $G$ . We denote by $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ the Grothendieck group of $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules [Reference ThomasonTho87, §1.4]. Forgetting the $G$ -equivariant structure induces a morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ . A finite, respectively flat, $G$ -equivariant morphism $f:Y\rightarrow X$ induces a push-forward morphism $f_{\ast }:K_{0}^{\prime }(Y;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ , respectively pull-back morphism $f^{\ast }:K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(Y;G)$ . The Grothendieck ring of $G$ -equivariant locally free coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules will be denoted by $K_{0}(X;G)$ . Any $G$ -equivariant morphism $f:Y\rightarrow X$ induces a pull-back morphism $K_{0}(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}(Y;G)$ , and $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ is naturally a $K_{0}(X;G)$ -module.

Proposition 3.1.5. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on $X$ , and $H$ a finite normal subgroup of $G$ acting freely on $X$ . Then the pull-back morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X/H;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ is surjective.

Proof. This follows from Proposition 2.4.9. ◻

3.2 Chow groups

3.2.1

When $X$ is a variety, we denote by ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ the free abelian group generated by the integral closed subschemes of $X$ . Every closed subscheme $Z$ of $X$ has a class $[Z]\in {\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ (defined as the sum of its irreducible components weighted by the lengths of the local rings of $Z$ at their generic points). The Chow group $\operatorname{CH}(X)$ is the quotient of ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ by rational equivalence; we refer to [Reference FultonFul98] (where the notation $A_{\ast }(X)$ is used) for its basic properties.

3.2.2

When $X$ is a variety with an action of an algebraic group $G$ , we will write $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ for the equivariant Chow group of $X$ , denoted by $A_{\ast }^{G}(X)$ in [Reference Edidin and GrahamEG98]. This group is constructed using intersection theory on algebraic spaces. The consideration of algebraic spaces is not required when $G$ is a finite algebraic group (the main case of interest in this paper), since quotients of varieties always exist as varieties (see § 2.2.3).

3.2.3

Let $i:Y\rightarrow X$ be the immersion of a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme, and $u:U\rightarrow X$ its open complement. The localisation sequence [Reference FultonFul98, Proposition 1.8] induces an exact sequence

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y)\xrightarrow[{}]{i_{\ast }}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{u^{\ast }}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(U)\rightarrow 0.\end{eqnarray}$$

3.2.4

The forgetful morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ is defined as follows. Any element of $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ is represented by an element of $\operatorname{CH}((X\times W)/G)$ , where $W$ is a nonempty $G$ -invariant open subscheme of a finite-dimensional $G$ -representation where $G$ acts freely (the quotient $(X\times \,W)/G$ exists as an algebraic space by [Reference ArtinArt74, Corollary 6.3]). Composing the flat pull-back $\operatorname{CH}((X\times \,W)/G)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,W)$ with the isomorphism $\operatorname{CH}(X\times \,W)\simeq \operatorname{CH}(X)$ of Lemma 3.3.1 below, we obtain a morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ .

Lemma 3.2.5. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting on $X$ , and $H$ a normal subgroup of $G$ acting freely on $X$ . Then the morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X/H)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ is surjective.

Proof. Let $Q=G/H$ and $Y=X/H$ . Let $W$ be a $G$ -invariant open subscheme of a finite-dimensional $G$ -representation where $G$ acts freely, and $U$ a $Q$ -invariant open subscheme of a finite-dimensional $Q$ -representation where $Q$ acts freely.

The morphism $f:Y\times \,U\times (W/H)\rightarrow Y\times \,U$ is flat and $Q$ -equivariant. Since $Q$ acts freely on its target, it follows by faithfully flat descent and Lemma 2.3.3 that the morphism $f/Q$ , which may be identified with $(Y\times \,U\times \,W)/G\rightarrow (Y\times \,U)/G$ , is flat.

The morphism $X\times \,U\times \,W\rightarrow Y\times \,U\times \,W$ is flat (by Proposition 2.3.2) and $G$ -equivariant. Since $G$ acts freely on its target, it follows as above that the morphism $(X\times \,U\times \,W)/G\times (Y\times \,U\times \,W)/G$ is flat.

Since $W$ is a $G$ -invariant open subscheme of a finite-dimensional $G$ -representation, and $H$ acts freely on $X\times \,U$ , it follows by faithfully flat descent, Lemma 2.3.3 and Proposition 2.4.9 that $(X\times \,U\times \,W)/H$ is a $Q$ -invariant open subscheme of a $Q$ -equivariant vector bundle over $(X\times \,U)/H=Y\times \,U$ . Since $Q$ acts freely on $Y\times \,U$ , by the same argument $((X\times \,U\times \,W)/H)/Q=(X\times \,U\times W)/G$ is an open subscheme of a vector bundle over $(Y\times \,U)/Q=(X\times \,U)/G$ .

Finally, the morphism $(X\times \,U)/G\rightarrow (Y\times \,U)/G$ is an isomorphism, hence we have a commutative diagram of flat pull-backs

where the upper horizontal morphism is surjective by homotopy invariance and the localisation sequence [Reference FultonFul98, Propositions 1.9 and 1.8]. Therefore the right vertical morphism is surjective. Its component of degree $n$ coincides with that of $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ , as soon as $U$ and $W$ are chosen so that their closed complements both have codimension ${>}\dim X-n$ .◻

3.2.6

We now explain how to lift the construction of [Reference FultonFul98, Definition 8.1.1] to equivariant Chow groups, as this will be needed in § 6. Let $f:X\rightarrow Y$ be a $G$ -equivariant morphism with $Y$ smooth. Let $Y^{\prime }\rightarrow Y$ and $X^{\prime }\rightarrow X$ be $G$ -equivariant morphisms. Associated with the cartesian square of $G$ -equivariant morphisms

is a morphism $(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f})^{!}:\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{\prime }\times \,Y^{\prime })\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{\prime }\times _{Y}Y^{\prime })$ such that the diagram

commutes (see [Reference BrosnanBro03, §3.1.1]). Given $x\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{\prime })$ and $y\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y^{\prime })$ , let $x\,\times _{G}y\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{\prime }\times \,Y^{\prime })$ be their exterior product [Reference Edidin and GrahamEG98, Definition-Proposition 2], and define

$$\begin{eqnarray}x\cdot _{f}y=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{f})^{!}(x\times _{G}y)\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{\prime }\times _{Y}Y^{\prime }).\end{eqnarray}$$

3.3 Purely transcendental extensions

Let us record here a couple of well-known observations.

Lemma 3.3.1. Let $W$ be a nonempty open subscheme of the affine space $\mathbb{A}^{d}$ , and let $X$ be a variety. Then the flat pull-backs $\operatorname{CH}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times W)$ and $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)_{(n)}\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,W)_{(n+d)}$ (for every integer $n$ ) are bijective.

Proof. We may find a nonconstant polynomial in $d$ variables with coefficients in $k$ whose nonvanishing locus $U$ is contained in $W$ . Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}$ be its degree. If the field $k$ is finite, it possesses two finite field extensions $k_{0},k_{1}$ of coprime degree, each containing more than $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+1$ elements. By a restriction–corestriction argument, it will suffice to prove the statement after successively replacing $k$ with $k_{0}$ and $k_{1}$ . Thus we may assume that $k$ contains $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}+1$ distinct elements. Then one sees by induction on $m$ that any nonzero polynomial of degree less than or equal to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}$ in $m$ variables with coefficients in $k$ induces a nonzero map $k^{m}\rightarrow k$ . In particular $U$ , and thus also $W$ , possesses a rational point. Then by [Reference Elman, Karpenko and MerkurjevEKM08, Lemma 55.7], respectively [Reference QuillenQui73, §7.2.5], the pull-back along the corresponding regular closed immersion $i:X\rightarrow X\times \,W$ is a retraction of the flat pull-back $\operatorname{CH}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,W)$ , respectively $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,W)$ . Since the latter is surjective by homotopy invariance and the localisation sequence (see [Reference FultonFul98, Propositions 1.9 and 1.8], respectively [Reference QuillenQui73, Propositions 7.3.2 and 7.4.1]), it is bijective. In addition, we have $i^{\ast }K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,W)_{(n+d)}\subset K_{0}^{\prime }(X)_{(n)}$ by [Reference GilletGil05, Theorem 83], concluding the proof.◻

Lemma 3.3.2. Let $K$ be a finitely generated purely transcendental field extension of $k$ . Then for any variety $X$ , the pull-back $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,\operatorname{Spec}K)$ is an isomorphism of filtered groups.

Proof. Let $d=\operatorname{tr.deg.}(K/k)$ . Then $E=\operatorname{Spec}K$ is the limit of a filtered family of nonempty open subschemes $W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ of $\mathbb{A}^{d}$ with affine transition morphisms. Thus by [Reference QuillenQui73, Proposition 7.2.2] the morphism

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{colim}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}})\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,E)\end{eqnarray}$$

is bijective. Since each morphism $E\rightarrow W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ is flat of relative dimension $-d$ , the above morphism restricts for every $n$ to an injective morphism of subgroups

(3.3a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{colim}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}})_{(n+d)}\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,E)_{(n)}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Now let

$Z$ be a closed subscheme of

$X\times \,E$ such that

$\dim Z\leqslant n$ . Consider the scheme theoretic closure

$Z_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ of

$Z$ in

$X\times \,W_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ . Any point of

$x\in Z_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$ is the specialisation of a point

$y\in Z$ , and

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{tr.deg.}(k(x)/k)\leqslant \operatorname{tr.deg.}(k(y)/k)=\operatorname{tr.deg.}(k(y)/K)+d\leqslant \dim Z+d.\end{eqnarray}$$

It follows that $\dim Z_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\leqslant n+d$ . We have a commutative diagram.

Since the upper horizontal morphism is surjective, we deduce that (3.3a) is surjective, and thus bijective. Now the statement follows from Lemma 3.3.1. ◻

3.4 An equivariant theory

In this section, we introduce an equivariant theory $K_{G}$ , for $G$ a finite algebraic group, which will be used exclusively in § 5.2. Its key properties may be summarised as follows (when $X$ is a variety with a $G$ -action).

(i) The forgetful morphism factors as $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{G}(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ .
(ii) The morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{G}(X)$ is surjective.
(iii) The morphism $K_{G}(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ is bijective when $X=\operatorname{Spec}k$ .
(iv) The group $K_{G}(X)$ is endowed with a filtration vanishing in negative degrees, which is compatible with the topological filtration of $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ via the morphism $K_{G}(X)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ .

Remark 3.4.1. The theory $K_{G}$ is constructed using the theory $K_{0}^{\prime }$ . One could perform the same construction using other cohomology theories instead; taking the Chow group would yield a quotient of the equivariant Chow group $\operatorname{CH}_{G}$ .

Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group. Let $V=H^{0}(G,{\mathcal{O}}_{G})$ be the regular representation of $G$ over $k$ . We view $E=\operatorname{End}(V)$ as a $G$ -representation by letting $G$ act by left composition. Then the group $G$ acts freely on the nonempty $G$ -invariant open subscheme $\operatorname{GL}(V)$ of $E$ . The scheme

$$\begin{eqnarray}T=\operatorname{Spec}k(E)\end{eqnarray}$$

may be identified with the generic fiber of the morphism $E\rightarrow E/G$ . Therefore $T$ is a variety over the field $F=k(E/G)=k(E)^{G}$ , and is equipped with a free $G$ -action.

Definition 3.4.2. When $X$ is a variety with a $G$ -action, we may view the scheme $X\times \,T$ as an $F$ -variety with a free $G$ -action, and we define

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{G}(X)=K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times \,T)/G).\end{eqnarray}$$

A filtration is defined by letting $K_{G}(X)_{(n)}=K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times T)/G)_{(n)}$ .

Remark 3.4.3. If $W$ is any generically free $G$ -representation of finite dimension over $k$ , replacing $T$ by $\operatorname{Spec}k(W)$ and $F$ by $k(W)^{G}$ in the above definition yields a canonically isomorphic filtered group. This observation will play no role in this paper, but may be used to construct a change of group morphism, for instance.

We may use Lemma 3.3.2 to define a morphism of filtered groups

(3.4a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{G}(X)=K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times \,T)/G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,T)\simeq K_{0}^{\prime }(X).\end{eqnarray}$$

Using the isomorphism induced by Proposition 2.4.9, we construct a morphism

(3.4b)

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,T;G)\simeq K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times \,T)/G)=K_{G}(X).\end{eqnarray}$$

The composite of (3.4b) and (3.4a) is the canonical morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ .

Lemma 3.4.4. The morphism (3.4b) is surjective.

Proof. This morphism may be factored as

(3.4c)

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,\operatorname{GL}(V);G)\simeq K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times \,\operatorname{GL}(V))/G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }((X\times \,T)/G).\end{eqnarray}$$

The first morphism is surjective by the equivariant versions of homotopy invariance and of the localisation sequence [Reference ThomasonTho87, Theorems 2.7 and 4.1], the middle isomorphism follows from Proposition 2.4.9. The scheme $\operatorname{Spec}F=T/G$ is a filtered limit of open subschemes of $\operatorname{GL}(V)/G$ with affine transition morphisms, hence by base-change (in view of Lemma 2.3.3) the scheme $(X\times \,T)/G$ is a filtered limit of open subschemes of $(X\times \,\operatorname{GL}(V))/G$ with affine transition morphisms. Thus the last morphism of (3.4c) is surjective by [Reference QuillenQui73, Propositions 7.2.2 and 7.3.2].◻

A flat, respectively proper, $G$ -equivariant morphism $f:Y\rightarrow X$ induces a morphism $f^{\ast }:K_{G}(X)\rightarrow K_{G}(Y)$ , respectively $f_{\ast }:K_{G}(Y)\rightarrow K_{G}(X)$ . The Grothendieck ring $K_{0}(X;G)$ naturally acts on $K_{G}(X)$ : any element $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in K_{0}(X;G)$ pulls back to an element of $K_{0}(X\times \,T;G)$ , which acts on $K_{0}^{\prime }(X\times \,T;G)=K_{G}(X)$ . We denote this action by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cap -:K_{G}(X)\rightarrow K_{G}(X)$ .

Lemma 3.4.5. Let $i:Y\rightarrow X$ be the immersion of a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme, and $u:U\rightarrow X$ its open complement. Then the following sequence is exact:

$$\begin{eqnarray}K_{G}(Y)\xrightarrow[{}]{i_{\ast }}K_{G}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{u^{\ast }}K_{G}(U)\rightarrow 0.\end{eqnarray}$$

Proof. Since $(Y\times \,T)/G$ is a closed subscheme of $(X\times \,T)/G$ with open complement $(U\times \,T)/G$ by Lemma 2.3.3 and faithfully flat descent, the lemma follows from the localisation sequence for $K_{0}^{\prime }$ (see [Reference QuillenQui73, Proposition 7.3.2]).◻

4 The degree of equivariant cycles

Definition 4.1. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . We denote by ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)$ the subgroup of ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ generated by classes of equidimensional $G$ -invariant closed subschemes of $X$ .

If $U$ is a $G$ -invariant open subscheme of $X$ , then the restriction morphism ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)\rightarrow {\mathcal{Z}}(U)$ maps the subgroup ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)$ surjectively onto ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(U)$ .

Lemma 4.2. Let $i:D\rightarrow X$ be a $G$ -equivariant principal effective Cartier divisor. Then the image of the composite ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{i^{\ast }}\operatorname{CH}(D)$ is contained in the image of the morphism ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(D)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(D)$ .

Proof. Let $Z$ be an equidimensional $G$ -invariant closed subscheme of $X$ . Let $Z_{0}$ (respectively $Z_{1}$ ) be the scheme theoretic closure of $Z-(D\cap Z)$ (respectively of $Z-Z_{0}$ ) in $Z$ . Then $Z_{0}$ is an equidimensional $G$ -invariant closed subscheme of $X$ , and we have $[Z]=[Z_{0}]+[Z_{1}]$ in ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ . In addition the closed subscheme $Z_{1}$ is supported inside $D$ , hence we may find $y\in {\mathcal{Z}}(D)$ such $[Z_{1}]=i_{\ast }(y)$ in ${\mathcal{Z}}(X)$ . Since $i$ is a principal effective Cartier divisor, it follows from [Reference FultonFul98, Proposition 2.6(c)] that the composite $i^{\ast }\circ i_{\ast }$ is the zero endomorphism of $\operatorname{CH}(D)$ , hence we have in $\operatorname{CH}(D)$

$$\begin{eqnarray}i^{\ast }[Z]=i^{\ast }[Z_{0}]+i^{\ast }[Z_{1}]=i^{\ast }[Z_{0}]+i^{\ast }\circ i_{\ast }(y)=i^{\ast }[Z_{0}].\end{eqnarray}$$

By construction, no associated point of $Z_{0}$ lies in $D$ , so that $D\cap Z_{0}\rightarrow Z_{0}$ is an effective Cartier divisor. Then by [Reference FultonFul98, Lemma 1.7.2] the cycle class $i^{\ast }[Z]=i^{\ast }[Z_{0}]\in \operatorname{CH}(D)$ is represented by the cycle $[Z_{0}\cap D]\in {\mathcal{Z}}(D)$ , which belongs to ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(D)$ , since $Z_{0}\cap D$ is an equidimensional $G$ -invariant closed subscheme of $D$ .◻

We recall that $\operatorname{CH}_{G}$ denotes the equivariant Chow group, see § 3.2.2.

Proposition 4.3. Let $G$ be a trigonalisable (§ 2.1.5) algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . Then the two morphisms

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\quad \text{and}\quad {\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\end{eqnarray}$$

have the same image.

Proof. Let $W$ be a nonempty $G$ -invariant open subscheme of a finite-dimensional $G$ -representation $V$ over $k$ , and assume that $G$ acts freely on $W$ . Consider the commutative diagram (see Lemma 3.3.1 for the indicated isomorphisms).

(If $G$ is not finite, then $(X\times \,W)/G$ may be only an algebraic space.) To prove the statement, it will suffice to prove that for every finite-dimensional $G$ -representation $V$ over $k$ , the two morphisms

$$\begin{eqnarray}{\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X\times \,V)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V)\text{ and }{\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V)\end{eqnarray}$$

have the same image. We proceed by induction on $\dim V$ , the case $V=0$ being clear. Assume that $V\neq 0$ . Since $G$ is trigonalisable, we can find a subrepresentation $V^{\prime }\subset V$ of codimension one. Let $i:X\times \,V^{\prime }\rightarrow X\times \,V$ be the induced $G$ -equivariant closed immersion. By Lemma 4.2, for any $x\in {\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X\times \,V)$ , the cycle class $i^{\ast }(x)\in \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V^{\prime })$ is represented by a cycle in ${\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X\times \,V^{\prime })$ .

By induction, we may find a cycle $y\in {\mathcal{Z}}_{G}(X)$ such that $i^{\ast }(x)=y\times \,[V^{\prime }]\in \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V^{\prime })$ . Using the surjectivity of $\operatorname{CH}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V)$ , we find $z\in \operatorname{CH}(X)$ such that $x=z\,\,\times [V]\in \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V)$ . Then $z\times \,[V^{\prime }]=i^{\ast }(x)=y\,\times \,[V^{\prime }]\in \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V^{\prime })$ (see [Reference Elman, Karpenko and MerkurjevEKM08, Lemma 55.7]), hence $z=y\in \operatorname{CH}(X)$ by injectivity of $\operatorname{CH}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V^{\prime })$ , and finally $x=y\times \,[V]\in \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,V)$ , as required.◻

Theorem 4.4. Let $G$ be a trigonalisable (§ 2.1.5) algebraic $p$ -group acting on a projective variety $X$ . Assume that the degree of every closed point of $X^{G}$ is divisible by $p$ . Then the morphism $d_{X}:\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{\deg }\mathbb{F}_{p}$ is zero.

Proof. By Proposition 4.3, it will suffice to prove that $\deg [T]=0\in \mathbb{F}_{p}$ for any equidimensional $G$ -invariant closed subscheme $T$ of $X$ . It will of course suffice to consider the case $\dim T=0$ . Replacing $X$ with $T$ , we may assume that $\dim X=0$ . Given a $G$ -invariant closed subscheme $Z$ of $X$ , consider the exact sequence of § 3.2.3

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Z)\xrightarrow[{}]{i_{\ast }}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{u^{\ast }}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X-Z)\rightarrow 0,\end{eqnarray}$$

where $i:Z\rightarrow X$ , respectively $u:X-Z\rightarrow X$ , is the closed, respectively open, immersion. Since $\dim X=0$ , the open immersion $u$ is also closed, and the push-forward morphism $u_{\ast }$ is a section of $u^{\ast }$ . In addition $d_{X}\circ i_{\ast }=d_{Z}$ and $d_{X}\circ u_{\ast }=d_{X-Z}$ , so that

(4.1a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{im}d_{X}=\operatorname{im}d_{Z}+\operatorname{im}d_{X-Z}\subset \mathbb{F}_{p}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Taking $Z=X^{G}$ , we see that in order to prove the proposition, it will suffice to assume that $X^{G}=\varnothing$ and prove that $d_{X}=0$ . To do so, we may assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. Using (4.1a) and noetherian induction, we may assume that $X$ possesses exactly two $G$ -invariant closed subschemes ( $\varnothing$ and $X$ ). It will thus suffice to prove that $\deg [X]=0\in \mathbb{F}_{p}$ . The choice of a rational point of $X$ induces a $G$ -equivariant morphism $G\rightarrow X$ , which must be scheme theoretically dominant. By [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , V, Théorème 10.1.2], there is a subgroup $H$ of $G$ such that $X$ is isomorphic to $G/H$ . The morphism $G\rightarrow G/H$ is flat and finite by Proposition 2.3.2, so that the integer $n=\dim _{k}H^{0}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ divides the order of $G$ , and is thus a $p$ th power. Since $H\neq G$ (as $X^{G}=\varnothing$ and $X\neq \varnothing$ ), it follows that $\deg [X]=n~\text{mod}~p$ vanishes in $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ .◻

Example 4.5. Assume that the field $k$ is algebraically closed of characteristic $\neq p$ , and let $G$ be a constant nonabelian finite $p$ -group. Then $G$ admits a simple representation $V$ of dimension $d=p^{n}$ with $n>0$ . Observe that the case $n=1$ actually occurs, when $G$ has order $p^{3}$ .

The group $G$ acts without fixed point on $\mathbb{P}(V)$ , but the cycle class $c_{1}({\mathcal{O}}(1))^{d-1}$ is in the image of $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(\mathbb{P}(V))\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(\mathbb{P}(V))$ and has degree prime to $p$ (equal to $1$ ). When $n=1$ , we have $\dim \mathbb{P}(V)=p-1$ .

The group $G$ also acts on $\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)$ with a single fixed point $\mathbb{P}(1)$ . Let $f:X\rightarrow \mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)$ be the blow-up at this point. There is a $G$ -action on $X$ making $f$ a $G$ -equivariant morphism. Then any fixed point of $X$ must be contained in the exceptional divisor $E$ , which is $G$ -equivariantly isomorphic to $\mathbb{P}(V)$ . Since the latter has no fixed point, it follows that $X(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ . The normal bundle of the effective Cartier divisor $j:\mathbb{P}(V)\simeq E\rightarrow X$ is ${\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}(V)}(-1)$ , hence the zero-cycle class

$$\begin{eqnarray}[E]^{d}=j_{\ast }\circ c_{1}({\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}(V)}(-1))^{d-1}[\mathbb{P}(V)]\in \operatorname{CH}(X)\end{eqnarray}$$

has degree $(-1)^{d-1}$ . The zero-cycle class on $\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)$

$$\begin{eqnarray}(c_{1}(T_{\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)}))^{d}=((d+1)\cdot c_{1}({\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)}(1)))^{d}\in \operatorname{CH}(\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1))\end{eqnarray}$$

has degree $(d+1)^{d}$ . By [Reference FultonFul98, 15.4.3], we have

$$\begin{eqnarray}c_{1}(T_{X})=f^{\ast }c_{1}(T_{\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)})+(1-d)[E]\in \operatorname{CH}^{1}(X),\end{eqnarray}$$

so that $\deg (c_{1}(T_{X})^{d})=2~\text{mod}~p$ . Thus we have found a Chern number of $X$ which is not divisible by $p$ , when $p\neq 2$ . When $n=1$ , we have $\dim X=p$ .

Now assume that $p=2$ . The group $G$ acts on $P=\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)\times \mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)$ with a single fixed point $\mathbb{P}(1)\times \,\mathbb{P}(1)$ . Let $g:Y\rightarrow P$ be the blow-up at this point. As above, we have $Y(k)^{G}=\varnothing$ , and by [Reference FultonFul98, Example 15.4.2(c)]

$$\begin{eqnarray}c_{2}(T_{Y})=g^{\ast }c_{2}(T_{P})\in \operatorname{CH}^{2}(Y)/2,\end{eqnarray}$$

so that we have in $\mathbb{F}_{2}$

$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg (c_{2}(T_{Y})^{d})=\deg (c_{2}(T_{P})^{d})=(\deg (c_{1}(T_{\mathbb{P}(V\oplus 1)}))^{d})^{2}=1\hspace{0.6em}{\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}2.\end{eqnarray}$$

Therefore one of the Chern numbers of $Y$ is odd. When $n=1$ , we have $\dim Y=4$ .

5 The Euler characteristic of equivariant modules

We now investigate divisibility properties of Euler characteristics of equivariant modules on a variety upon which a finite $p$ -group acts without fixed points. The next proposition shows that the case of a free action can be easily handled.

Proposition 5.0.1. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting freely on a projective variety $X$ . Then the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is divisible by the order of $G$ .

Proof. By Proposition 2.4.9 we may find a coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X/G}$ -module ${\mathcal{G}}$ whose pull-back to $X$ is isomorphic to ${\mathcal{F}}$ . Then $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})=n\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X/G,{\mathcal{G}})$ , where $n$ is the order of $G$ , see [Reference MumfordMum08, §12, Theorem 2].◻

5.1 Dual cyclic groups

Theorem 5.1.1. Let $p$ be a prime, and $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p^{r}}$ for some integer $r$ . Let $X$ be a projective variety with a $G$ -action such that $X^{G}=\varnothing$ . Then the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is divisible by $p$ .

Proof. We may assume that $X\neq \varnothing$ . Then $r\geqslant 1$ , and $G$ contains a subgroup $H$ isomorphic to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p^{r-1}}$ . It follows from Proposition 5.1.3 below that $(X/H)^{G/H}=(X/H)^{G}=\varnothing$ . Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:X\rightarrow X/H$ be the quotient morphism. By Lemma 5.1.2 below, there is a $G/H$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X/H}$ -module ${\mathcal{G}}$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X/H,{\mathcal{G}})$ is congruent modulo $p$ to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X/H,\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\ast }{\mathcal{F}})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ . Replacing the variety $X$ with $X/H$ , the group $G$ with $G/H$ , and the module ${\mathcal{F}}$ with ${\mathcal{G}}$ , we may assume that $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ . Then $G$ acts freely on $X$ by Lemma 2.3.4, and the theorem follows from Proposition 5.0.1.◻

Lemma 5.1.2. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a projective variety $X$ . Let $D$ be a diagonalisable central subgroup of $G$ acting trivially on $X$ . Then for any prime $p$ and any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ , we may find a $G/D$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{G}}$ such that

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{G}})\hspace{0.6em}{\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}p.\end{eqnarray}$$

Proof. By Lemma 2.4.5 we may assume that the $\widehat{D}$ -grading of ${\mathcal{F}}$ is concentrated in a single degree $d\in \widehat{D}$ . If $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ is divisible by $p$ , we may simply take ${\mathcal{G}}=0$ . Otherwise by the definition (3.1a) there is an integer $i$ such that $\dim _{k}H^{i}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ is prime to $p$ . Then $V=H^{i}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ is a $G$ -representation whose induced $\widehat{D}$ -grading is concentrated in degree $d$ . The group $D$ acts trivially on the $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}\otimes _{k}V^{\vee }$ , and the integer $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}}\otimes _{k}V^{\vee })=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})\cdot \dim _{k}V^{\vee }$ is prime to $p$ . We may thus construct ${\mathcal{G}}$ as a direct sum of copies of ${\mathcal{F}}\otimes _{k}V^{\vee }$ .◻

Proposition 5.1.3. Let $p$ be a prime, and $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p^{r}}$ for some integer $r$ . Let $X$ be a variety with a $G$ -action and $H$ a subgroup of $G$ such that $H\neq G$ . Then the morphism $X^{G}\rightarrow (X/H)^{G}$ is surjective.

Proof. Let us write $Y=X/H$ . Let $y\in Y^{G}(K)$ for some algebraically closed field extension $K$ of $k$ with trivial $G$ -action. We may lift $y\in Y(K)$ to a point $x\in X(K)$ , and it will suffice to prove that $x\in X^{G}(K)$ . To do so, we may assume that $X=\operatorname{Spec}A$ . Then we have a $k$ -algebra morphism $f:A\rightarrow K$ whose restriction $A^{H}\rightarrow K$ (see (2.2a)) induces a $G$ -equivariant morphism (of schemes), and want prove that $f$ induces a $G$ -equivariant morphism.

A $G$ -action on $\operatorname{Spec}A$ is a $k$ -vector space decomposition $A=\bigoplus _{i\in \mathbb{Z}/p^{r}}A_{i}$ such that $A_{i}\cdot A_{j}\subset A_{i+j}$ (see § 2.1.3). The group $H^{\ast }=\ker (\mathbb{Z}/p^{r}\rightarrow \widehat{H})$ is nontrivial by the assumption $H\neq G$ , and we have $A^{H}=\bigoplus _{j\in H^{\ast }}A_{j}$ . The assumption that $f|_{A^{H}}$ induces a $G$ -equivariant morphism means that $f|_{A_{j}}=0$ whenever $j\in H^{\ast }-\{0\}$ . Now let $i\in \mathbb{Z}/p^{r}-\{0\}$ and $a\in A_{i}$ . Since any two nontrivial subgroups of a cyclic $p$ -group must have a nontrivial intersection, we may find an integer $n$ such that $ni\in H^{\ast }-\{0\}$ . Then $a^{n}\in A_{ni}$ with $ni\in H^{\ast }-\{0\}$ , hence $0=f(a^{n})=f(a)^{n}$ . Since $K$ is a field, we conclude that $f(a)=0$ , proving that $f$ induces a $G$ -equivariant morphism.◻

Example 5.1.4. We define a group morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}_{p}$ by mapping $\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}(R)$ for a $k$ -algebra $R$ to the diagonal matrix with coefficients $1,\unicode[STIX]{x1D709},\ldots ,\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}^{p-1}$ . This induces an action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ on $X=\mathbb{P}^{p-1}$ . If $K$ is a field extension of $k$ , then $X^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}}(K)$ consists of the $p$ points $[1:0:\cdots :0],[0:1:0\cdots :0],\ldots ,[0:\cdots :0:1]$ .

We define a group morphism $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}_{p}$ by mapping the generator to the automorphism $(x_{0},\ldots ,x_{p-1})\mapsto (x_{1},\ldots ,x_{p-1},x_{0})$ . This induces an action of $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ on $X$ . If $K$ is a field extension of $k$ , then $X^{(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}}(K)=\{[1:\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}:\cdots :\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}^{p-1}]|\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}(K)\}$ .

The two actions commute, inducing an action of $G=\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\times (\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ on $X$ such that $X^{G}=\varnothing$ , while $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=1$ is prime to $p$ .

Example 5.1.5. Assume that the field $k$ is algebraically closed of characteristic $\neq p$ . Let $G$ be a constant abelian noncyclic $p$ -group. Then $G$ admits a quotient isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}\times (\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ and thus to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\times (\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ by our assumptions on $k$ . Therefore by Example 5.1.4 the group $G$ acts without fixed point on $\mathbb{P}^{p-1}$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\mathbb{P}^{p-1},{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{p-1}})$ is prime to $p$ .

The next two examples show that in Theorem 5.1.1 the assumption ‘ $X^{G}=\varnothing$ ’ may not be weakened to the assumption ‘every closed point of $X^{G}$ has degree divisible by $p$ ’.

Example 5.1.6. Let $X$ be the Severi–Brauer variety of a finite-dimensional central division $k$ -algebra of degree $p$ . Let a $p$ -group $G$ act trivially on $X$ . Then $\dim X=p-1$ and the degree of every closed point of $X^{G}$ is divisible by $p$ , but $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=1$ .

Example 5.1.7. For a less degenerate example, assume that an element $a\in k-k^{p}$ exists. The automorphism $(x_{0},\ldots ,x_{p-1})\mapsto (x_{1},\ldots ,x_{p-1},ax_{0})$ in $\operatorname{GL}_{p}(k)$ maps to an element of order $p$ in $\operatorname{PGL}_{p}(k)$ . This defines an action of $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ on $X=\mathbb{P}^{p-1}$ . The fixed locus $X^{(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}}$ is supported on the closed point $\{[1:z:\cdots :z^{p-1}]|z^{p}=a\}$ of degree $p$ . Thus $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=1$ is not the degree of a zero-cycle supported on $X^{(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}}$ .

5.2 Varieties of small dimension

Let us consider the morphism (see § 3.4)

Proposition 5.2.1. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic group acting on a projective variety $X$ . Assume that $G$ contains $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ as a central subgroup. If $\dim X<p-1$ , then

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G}(X))=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G}(X^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}}))\subset \mathbb{F}_{p}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Proof. The action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ on $U=X-X^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}}$ is free by Lemma 2.3.4. Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}:U\rightarrow U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ be the quotient morphism. The $\mathbb{Z}/p$ -grading $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U}=\bigoplus _{n\in \mathbb{Z}/p}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U})_{n}$ is compatible with the $G$ -equivariant structure of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U}$ by Lemma 2.4.5. By [Reference Demazure and GrothendieckSGA3₁ , VIII, Proposition 4.1] the $G$ -equivariant ${\mathcal{O}}_{U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}}$ -module ${\mathcal{L}}=(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U})_{1}$ is invertible, and for $i\in \mathbb{Z}$ , the morphism ${\mathcal{L}}^{\,\otimes \,i}\rightarrow (\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U})_{i~\text{mod}~p}$ is an isomorphism; in addition it is $G$ -equivariant, since the product morphism of the ring $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U}$ is $G$ -equivariant. We thus obtain a $G$ -equivariant decomposition

(5.2a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{U}\simeq \bigoplus _{i=0}^{p-1}{\mathcal{L}}^{\,\otimes \,i}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in K_{G}(X)$ . Consider the following commutative diagram.

Since the upper horizontal and left vertical morphisms are surjective, respectively by Lemma 3.4.4 and Proposition 3.1.5, it follows that the right vertical morphism is surjective as well. Thus we may find $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|_{U}\in K_{G}(U)$ . By the projection formula [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, IV, (2.12.4)] and the decomposition (5.2a), we have in $K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})$

(5.2b)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|_{U})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=\mathop{\sum }_{i=0}^{p-1}[{\mathcal{L}}]^{i}\cap \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}.\end{eqnarray}$$

There is a polynomial $Q$ with integral coefficients such that we have in $K_{0}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p};G)$

(5.2c)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\mathop{\sum }_{i=0}^{p-1}[{\mathcal{L}}]^{i}=(1-[{\mathcal{L}}])^{p-1}+p\cdot Q([{\mathcal{L}}]).\end{eqnarray}$$

Since $(1-[{\mathcal{L}}])\cap K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})_{(n)}\subset K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})_{(n-1)}$ for every $n$ (see [Reference Fulton and LangFL85, VI, Proposition 5.2] or [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, X, Théorème 1.3.2]), and $\dim U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\leqslant p-2$ , we have $(1-[{\mathcal{L}}])^{p-1}\,\cap \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})_{(-1)}=0$ , and the combination of (5.2b) and (5.2c) yields

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|_{U})\in p\cdot K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}).\end{eqnarray}$$

By Lemma 3.4.5 we can find $y\in K_{G}(X/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})-py$ restricts to zero in $K_{G}(U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p})$ , where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ denotes the quotient morphism. The morphism $i:X^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}}\rightarrow X/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ is a closed immersion by [Reference HautionHau16, (3.2.3(ii))], with open complement $U/\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ . By Lemma 3.4.5 we may find $z\in K_{G}(X^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}})$ such that $i_{\ast }(z)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})-py$ . To finish, observe that

Proposition 5.2.2. Let $X$ be a projective variety such that $\dim X<p-1$ . Then the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is congruent modulo $p$ to the degree of some zero-cycle supported on $X$ .

Proof. The group $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ is generated by classes $[{\mathcal{O}}_{Z}]$ for $Z$ a closed subscheme of $X$ (see [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, X, Corollaire 1.1.4]). By [Reference HautionHau12, Proposition 9.1], for such $Z$ the integer $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(Z,{\mathcal{O}}_{Z})$ is congruent modulo $p$ to the degree of some zero-cycle supported on $Z$ , and in particular on $X$ .◻

Theorem 5.2.3. Let $G$ be a finite algebraic $p$ -group acting on a projective variety $X$ . Assume that the degree of every closed point of $X^{G}$ is divisible by $p$ . If $\operatorname{char}k=p$ , assume that there are normal subgroups $1=G_{0}\subset G_{1}\subset \cdots \subset G_{n}=G$ such that the subgroup $G_{i}/G_{i-1}$ is central in $G/G_{i-1}$ and isomorphic to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ , for $i=1,\ldots ,n$ .

(i) If $\dim X<p-1$ , then the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module is divisible by $p$ .
(ii) If $\dim X<p-1$ , then the morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{\deg }\mathbb{F}_{p}$ is zero.
(iii) If $\dim X<p$ and $X$ is smooth, then any Chern number (§ 1.1) of $X$ is divisible by $p$ .

Proof. Let us first assume that $\operatorname{char}k\neq p$ . In order to prove the theorem, we may replace $k$ with an extension of degree prime to $p$ . Applying Lemma 5.2.4 recursively and extending scalars, we obtain normal subgroups $1=G_{0}\subset G_{1}\subset \cdots \subset G_{n}=G$ such that $G_{i}/G_{i-1}$ is central in $G/G_{i-1}$ and isomorphic to $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ . Enlarging once more the field $k$ , we may assume that it contains a nontrivial $p$ th root of unity, so that $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}\simeq \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ .

It will thus suffice to prove the theorem when the characteristic of $k$ is arbitrary, assuming that $G$ admits normal subgroups $1=G_{0}\subset G_{1}\subset \cdots \subset G_{n}=G$ such that the subgroup $G_{i}/G_{i-1}$ is central in $G/G_{i-1}$ and isomorphic to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ .

Assume that $\dim X<p-1$ . We prove by descending induction on $i=n,\ldots ,0$ that

(5.2d)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G/G_{i}}(X^{G_{i}}))=0.\end{eqnarray}$$

If $i=n$ , then $G=G_{n}$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G/G_{n}}(X^{G}))$ is contained in the image of $K_{0}^{\prime }(X^{G})\xrightarrow[{}]{\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,-)}\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{p}$ . The latter is zero by Proposition 5.2.2 and the assumption on $X^{G}$ , so that (5.2d) holds for $i=n$ . Now (5.2d) follows by induction, since for $i\in \{1,\ldots ,n\}$ we have

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G/G_{i-1}}(X^{G_{i-1}}))=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G/G_{i-1}}(X^{G_{i}}))=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G/G_{i}}(X^{G_{i}})).\end{eqnarray}$$

Indeed, the first equality follows by applying Proposition 5.2.1 to the central subgroup $G_{i}/G_{i-1}\simeq \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ of $G/G_{i-1}$ acting on the variety $X^{G_{i-1}}$ . The second equality follows from Lemma 5.1.2, since the diagonalisable central subgroup $G_{i}/G_{i-1}\simeq \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ of $G/G_{i-1}$ acts trivially on the variety $X^{G_{i}}$ .

Taking $i=0$ in (5.2d), we obtain $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}(K_{G}(X))=0$ . Since the morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ factors through $K_{G}(X)$ , we have proved (i).

Using the notation of § 3.4, the morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ factors as

$$\begin{eqnarray}\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X\times \,T)\simeq \operatorname{CH}((X\times \,T)/G)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,T)\simeq \operatorname{CH}(X).\end{eqnarray}$$

The last isomorphism follows from Lemma 3.3.1 (in view of [Reference Elman, Karpenko and MerkurjevEKM08, Proposition 52.9]), and the first from [Reference Edidin and GrahamEG98, Proposition 8(a)] (since $G$ acts freely on $X\times \,T$ ). Consider the composite

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}:\operatorname{CH}((X\times \,T)/G)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X\times \,T)\simeq \operatorname{CH}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{\deg }\mathbb{F}_{p}.\end{eqnarray}$$

Since $\dim T=0$ , we have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}(\operatorname{CH}_{d}((X\times \,T)/G))=0$ unless $d=0$ . Thus in order to prove (ii), it will suffice to consider a zero-dimensional closed subscheme $Z$ of $(X\times T)/G$ , and prove that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}[Z]=0$ . But for such $Z$ , we have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}[Z]=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}[{\mathcal{O}}_{Z}]$ , which vanishes by (i).

We now prove (iii) by induction on the length $n$ of the central series. The statement is true if $n=0$ . Assume that $n\geqslant 1$ and $\dim X<p$ . Let $Y$ be the scheme theoretic closure of $U=X-X^{G_{1}}$ in $X$ , and $Z$ the open complement of $Y$ . Then $Y$ is the union of the connected components of $X$ meeting $U$ (as $X$ is smooth), hence is open in $X$ . Thus $X$ decomposes $G$ -equivariantly as the disjoint union of the open subschemes $Y$ and $Z$ . Every Chern number of $X$ is the sum of a Chern number of $Y$ and one of $Z$ . Applying the induction hypothesis to the $G/G_{1}$ -action on the variety $Z$ (which is a closed subscheme of $X^{G_{1}}$ by construction), we may replace $X$ with $Y$ , and thus assume that $\dim X^{G_{1}}<p-1$ . Since the tangent bundle of $X$ is $G$ -equivariant by Remark 2.4.8, its Chern classes lie in the image of $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)$ , hence it will suffice to prove that the composite $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X)\xrightarrow[{}]{\deg }\mathbb{F}_{p}$ is zero. To do so, we proceed as in the proof of Proposition 5.2.1. The group $G_{1}\simeq \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}$ acts freely on $U$ by Lemma 2.3.4. Denote by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/G_{1}$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}:U\rightarrow U/G_{1}$ be the quotient morphisms, and let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)$ . Then the pull-back morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\ast }:\operatorname{CH}_{G}(U/G_{1})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(U)$ is surjective by Lemma 3.2.5, so that we may find $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(U/G_{1})$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}|_{U}$ . By the localisation sequence of § 3.2.3, we may find $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{\prime }\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X/G_{1})$ such that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{\prime }|_{U/G_{1}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$ . Since the morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$ is flat and finite of degree $p$ by Proposition 2.3.2, the endomorphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{\ast }\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\ast }$ of $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(U/G_{1})$ is multiplication by $p$ , and it follows that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})-p\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{\prime }$ restricts to zero in $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(U/G_{1})$ . The morphism $i:X^{G_{1}}\rightarrow X/G_{1}$ is a closed immersion by [Reference HautionHau16, (3.2.3(ii))], with open complement $U/G_{1}$ . Using the localisation sequence of § 3.2.3, we see that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})=p\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}^{\prime }+i_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE})$ for some $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X^{G_{1}})$ . Since $\dim X^{G_{1}}<p-1$ , we may finish the proof using (ii).◻

Lemma 5.2.4. Let $G$ be an étale $p$ -group satisfying $G\neq 1$ . Then, after an extension of degree prime to $p$ of the base field, the algebraic group $G$ possesses a central subgroup isomorphic to the constant algebraic group $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ .

Proof. Let $C$ be the centre of $G$ and $\overline{k}$ an algebraic closure of $k$ . Then the ordinary group $C(\overline{k})$ is the centre of the nontrivial ordinary $p$ -group $G(\overline{k})$ , hence is nontrivial. Thus the algebraic group $C$ is nontrivial (and is again an étale $p$ -group). The open complement of the unit in $C$ is a variety which is reduced and finite of degree prime to $p$ , hence possesses a closed point of degree prime to $p$ . Extending scalars, we may assume that the ordinary $p$ -group $C(k)$ is nontrivial, hence contains a subgroup isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}/p$ , which implies that the algebraic group $C$ contains a subgroup isomorphic to the constant algebraic group $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ .◻

5.3 Characteristic $p$

In the next statement it is necessary to assume that $k$ is perfect, as shown by Examples 5.1.6 and 5.1.7.

Theorem 5.3.1. Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p>0$ . Let $G$ be either a constant algebraic $p$ -group, or an extension of one by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}$ . Let $X$ be a projective variety with a $G$ -action such that the degree of every closed point of $X^{G}$ is divisible by $p$ . Then the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ is divisible by $p$ .

Proof. We proceed by induction on the order of $G$ . When the group $G$ is trivial, the statement follows from Lemma 5.3.2 below. Note that referring to that result is unnecessary when $k$ is algebraically closed (in particular while proving Theorem 1.1.1): since the variety $X$ possesses no closed point of degree prime to $p$ , it must be empty, so that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})=0$ .

If the group $G$ is nontrivial, it admits a normal subgroup $C$ isomorphic to $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}$ or $(\mathbb{Z}/p)_{k}$ , and such that $G/C$ is a constant $p$ -group. Let $Y$ be the scheme theoretic image of the composite morphism $X^{C}\rightarrow X\rightarrow X/C$ , and denote by $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/C$ the quotient morphism. Let $U=\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{-1}(X/C-Y)$ , and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:U\rightarrow U/C=X/C-Y$ the restriction of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}$ . Since $U^{C}=\varnothing$ , it follows from Lemma 2.3.4 that the group $C$ acts freely on $U$ . Thus by Proposition 3.1.5, there is an element $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in K_{0}^{\prime }(U/C;G)$ such that $[{\mathcal{F}}]|_{U}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}^{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD})$ in $K_{0}^{\prime }(U;G)$ . By Lemma 5.3.4, we have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\ast }([{\mathcal{F}}]|_{U})=p\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\in K_{0}^{\prime }(U/C;G)$ . By the localisation sequence [Reference ThomasonTho87, Theorem 2.7], it follows that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }[{\mathcal{F}}]\in K_{0}^{\prime }(X/C;G)$ is modulo $p$ the image of an element of $K_{0}^{\prime }(Y;G)$ , and thus by Lemma 5.3.3 of $K_{0}^{\prime }(Y;G/C)$ . Since $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X/C,\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }{\mathcal{F}})$ , it will suffice to prove that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(Y,{\mathcal{E}})$ is divisible by $p$ for any $G/C$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{Y}$ -module ${\mathcal{E}}$ . To do so, it will suffice by induction to prove that the degree of any closed point $y\in Y^{G/C}$ is divisible by $p$ . The field $k(y)$ is perfect, being a finite extension of the perfect field $k$ . The $G/C$ -equivariant morphism $X^{C}\rightarrow Y$ is surjective, and radicial by Lemma 2.2.5. Therefore by Lemma 5.3.5 (applied to the smooth group $G/C$ ) we may find a closed point of $(X^{C})^{G/C}=X^{G}$ (mapping to $y$ ) with residue field isomorphic to $k(y)$ , so that the degree of $y$ must be divisible by $p$ , by our assumption on $X^{G}$ .◻

The next lemma is due to Rost [Reference RostRos08, Corollary 1].

Lemma 5.3.2. Let $k$ be a perfect field of characteristic $p>0$ . Let $X$ be a projective variety, and $n$ a positive integer. If the degree of every closed point of $X$ is divisible by $p^{n}$ , then so is the Euler characteristic $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{F}})$ of any coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ .

Proof. We proceed by induction on $d=\dim X$ . Since the group $K_{0}^{\prime }(X)$ is generated by classes $[{\mathcal{O}}_{Z}]$ for $Z$ an integral closed subscheme of $X$ (see [Reference Berthelot, Grothendieck and IllusieSGA6, X, Corollaire 1.1.4]), we may assume that $X$ is integral and that ${\mathcal{F}}={\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ . The case $d=0$ is clear, since $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=[k(X):k]$ . Assume that $d>0$ . Denote by $X^{(p)}=X\times _{\operatorname{Spec}k}\operatorname{Spec}k$ the base-change of $X$ under the absolute Frobenius morphism of $\operatorname{Spec}k$ . Since $k$ is perfect, the first projection $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}:X^{(p)}\rightarrow X$ is an $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ -isomorphism. In particular $X^{(p)}$ is integral; let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}$ be its generic point. The relative Frobenius $F:X\rightarrow X^{(p)}$ is a finite $k$ -morphism. By [Reference LiuLiu02, Corollary 3.2.27] the $k(X^{(p)})$ -vector space $(F_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{X})_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}}=k(X)$ has dimension $p^{d}$ , hence there is a nonempty open subscheme $V$ of $X^{(p)}$ such that the ${\mathcal{O}}_{V}$ -module $(F_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{X})|_{V}$ is free of rank $p^{d}$ . By the localisation sequence for $K_{0}^{\prime }$ (see [Reference QuillenQui73, Proposition 7.3.2]), this implies that $[F_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{X}]-p^{d}[{\mathcal{O}}_{X^{(p)}}]=i_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\in K_{0}^{\prime }(X^{(p)})$ for some $\unicode[STIX]{x1D700}\in K_{0}^{\prime }(Y)$ , where $i:Y\rightarrow X^{(p)}$ is the immersion of the reduced closed complement of $V$ . The composite $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\circ i:Y\rightarrow X^{(p)}\rightarrow X$ maps closed points to closed points (being a closed immersion), multiplying their degrees by $[k:k^{p}]=1$ . Thus the degree of every closed point of $Y$ is a multiple of $p^{n}$ , hence $p^{n}$ divides $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(Y,\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})$ by induction. It follows from (3.1a) and [Reference LiuLiu02, Corollary 5.2.27] that $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X^{(p)},{\mathcal{O}}_{X^{(p)}})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ . We have $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X^{(p)},F_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{X})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ , because $F$ is a finite $k$ -morphism. Thus

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(Y,\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X^{(p)},i_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X^{(p)},F_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{X})-p^{d}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X^{(p)},{\mathcal{O}}_{X^{(p)}})=(1-p^{d})\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X}).\end{eqnarray}$$

Since $d>0$ and $p^{n}$ divides $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(Y,\unicode[STIX]{x1D700})$ , we conclude that $p^{n}$ must divide $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(X,{\mathcal{O}}_{X})$ .◻

Lemma 5.3.3. Let $G$ be an algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . Let $H$ be a normal unipotent subgroup of $G$ acting trivially on $X$ . Then the natural morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G/H)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ is surjective.

Proof. Let ${\mathcal{F}}$ be a $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -module. We construct inductively $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}$ for $i\in \mathbb{N}$ as follows. Let ${\mathcal{F}}_{0}={\mathcal{F}}$ . Assuming ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}$ constructed, we consider its $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -submodule $({\mathcal{F}}_{i})^{H}$ (see Definition 2.4.6), and define ${\mathcal{F}}_{i+1}={\mathcal{F}}_{i}/({\mathcal{F}}_{i})^{H}$ . As ${\mathcal{F}}$ is coherent and $X$ noetherian, there is an integer $n$ such that the morphism ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}\rightarrow {\mathcal{F}}_{i+1}$ is an isomorphism for all $i\geqslant n$ . Thus we have $({\mathcal{F}}_{i})^{H}=0$ for $i\geqslant n$ . We claim that this implies that ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}=0$ for such $i$ . Indeed, let $U$ be an open subscheme of $X$ such that ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}(U)\neq 0$ . Then ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}(U)$ is a nonzero $H$ -representation over $k$ , and, since $H$ is unipotent, it follows that ${\mathcal{F}}_{i}(U)^{H}\neq 0$ . But $({\mathcal{F}}_{i})^{H}(U)={\mathcal{F}}_{i}(U)^{H}$ by Remark 2.4.7, a contradiction.

Using the relations $[{\mathcal{F}}_{i}]=[{\mathcal{F}}_{i+1}]+[({\mathcal{F}}_{i})^{H}]$ for $i=0,\ldots ,n-1$ and $[{\mathcal{F}}_{n}]=0$ in $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ , we see that $[{\mathcal{F}}]=[{\mathcal{F}}_{0}]\in K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ is the image of an element of $K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G/H)$ , namely $[({\mathcal{F}}_{0})^{H}]+\cdots +[({\mathcal{F}}_{n-1})^{H}]$ .◻

Lemma 5.3.4. Let $G$ be a unipotent algebraic group acting on a variety $X$ . Let $H$ be a finite normal subgroup of $G$ acting freely on $X$ . Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}:X\rightarrow X/H$ be the quotient morphism. Then the endomorphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }$ of $K_{0}^{\prime }(X/H;G)$ is multiplication by the order of $H$ .

Proof. Let $R$ be the coordinate ring of $H$ , and $d=\dim _{k}R$ the order of $H$ . We let $G$ act on $H$ by $(g,h)\mapsto ghg^{-1}$ . The commutative square of $G$ -equivariant morphisms

where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC},\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$ denote respectively the action and projection, is cartesian by Proposition 2.3.2. For any $G$ -equivariant coherent ${\mathcal{O}}_{X/H}$ -module ${\mathcal{F}}$ , the $G$ -equivariant morphism of ${\mathcal{O}}_{X}$ -modules

$$\begin{eqnarray}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}})\otimes _{k}R=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }{\mathcal{F}}\end{eqnarray}$$

is an isomorphism by [Reference GrothendieckEGAII, (1.5.2)]. The forgetful morphism $K_{0}^{\prime }(\operatorname{Spec}k;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(\operatorname{Spec}k)$ is injective, being a retraction of a surjective morphism by Lemma 5.3.3. It follows that $[R]=d\in K_{0}^{\prime }(\operatorname{Spec}k;G)$ . Thus

(5.3a)

$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}_{\ast }\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }=d\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }:K_{0}^{\prime }(X/H;G)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G).\end{eqnarray}$$

The composite

$K_{0}^{\prime }(X/H;G/H)\rightarrow K_{0}^{\prime }(X/H;G)\xrightarrow[{}]{\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }}K_{0}^{\prime }(X;G)$ is bijective by Proposition 2.4.9, and the first morphism is surjective by Lemma 5.3.3. Thus the second morphism

$\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}^{\ast }$ is bijective, and the lemma follows from (5.3a).◻

Lemma 5.3.5. Let $G$ be a smooth algebraic group and $Y\rightarrow X$ a $G$ -equivariant surjective radicial morphism. Then the map $Y^{G}(K)\rightarrow X^{G}(K)$ is bijective for any perfect field extension $K/k$ with trivial $G$ -action.

Proof. Let $F$ be the fiber of $Y\rightarrow X$ over a point in $X^{G}(K)$ , and $F_{\text{red}}$ the underlying reduced closed subscheme. The scheme $F$ , and thus also $F_{\text{red}}$ , is nonempty and radicial over $\operatorname{Spec}K$ . Since $K$ is perfect, the morphism $F_{\text{red}}\rightarrow \operatorname{Spec}K$ is an isomorphism. As the group $G$ is reduced, the closed subscheme $F_{\text{red}}$ of $F$ is $G$ -invariant. It follows that the isomorphism $F_{\text{red}}\rightarrow \operatorname{Spec}K$ is $G$ -equivariant. Its inverse provides a $G$ -equivariant morphism $\operatorname{Spec}K\rightarrow F_{\text{red}}\rightarrow F\rightarrow Y$ , and therefore the required $K$ -point of $Y^{G}$ .◻

We now provide two examples showing that Theorem 5.3.1 does not generalise to arbitrary algebraic $p$ -groups.

Example 5.3.6. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic two. The subgroups of $\operatorname{GL}_{2}$

$$\begin{eqnarray}\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}1 & \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)\quad \text{and}\quad \left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}1 & 0\\ \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2} & 1\end{array}\right)\end{eqnarray}$$

induce two actions of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}$ on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ . For a field extension $K/k$ with trivial $G$ -action, the sets $(\mathbb{P}^{1})^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}}(K)$ are respectively $\{[1:0]\}$ and $\{[0:1]\}$ . Since the two actions commute with one another, this gives an action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}\times \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}$ on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ without fixed point, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\mathbb{P}^{1},{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}})=1$ is odd.

Example 5.3.7. Let $k$ be a field of characteristic two. Sending $a\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}(R)$ , for a commutative $k$ -algebra $R$ , to the matrix

$$\begin{eqnarray}\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}1 & a\\ a & 1\end{array}\right)\in \operatorname{GL}_{2}(R)\end{eqnarray}$$

defines a group morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}\rightarrow \operatorname{PGL}_{2}$ . If $K/k$ is a field extension with trivial $G$ -action, the only fixed $K$ -point for the induced action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}$ on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ is $[1:1]$ .

We define a group morphism $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{2}\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}_{2}$ by sending $\unicode[STIX]{x1D709}\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{2}(R)$ , for a commutative $k$ -algebra $R$ , to the matrix

$$\begin{eqnarray}\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}1 & 0\\ 0 & \unicode[STIX]{x1D709}\end{array}\right)\in \operatorname{GL}_{2}(R).\end{eqnarray}$$

If $K/k$ is a field extension with trivial $G$ -action, the only fixed $K$ -points for the induced action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{2}$ on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ are $[0:1]$ and $[1:0]$ .

Letting $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{2}$ act on $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}$ via the restriction of the natural action of $\mathbb{G}_{m}$ on $\mathbb{G}_{a}$ , we obtain an action of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{2}\rtimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{2}$ on $\mathbb{P}^{1}$ without fixed point, and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\mathbb{P}^{1},{\mathcal{O}}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}})=1$ is odd.

Remark 5.3.8. It would be interesting to determine for which algebraic $p$ -groups $G$ in characteristic $p$ does the arithmetic genus detect fixed points (in the sense of (c) in the introduction). We have proved that it does when $G\in \{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}\times \,\mathbb{Z}/p,\mathbb{Z}/p\times \,\mathbb{Z}/p,\mathbb{Z}/p^{2},\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p^{2}}\}$ (see Theorems 5.3.1 and 5.1.1), but not when $G\in \{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}\times \,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p},\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\times \,\mathbb{Z}/p,\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{p}\rtimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D707}_{p}\}$ (see Examples 5.3.6, 5.1.4 and 5.3.7).

6 Browder’s theorem

The next statement may be thought of as a relative version of Theorems 4.4 and 5.2.3(ii). It implies an algebraic version of a theorem of Browder in topology (see § 1.3).

Theorem 6.1. Let $G$ be an algebraic $p$ -group and $f:Y\rightarrow X$ a projective $G$ -equivariant morphism. Assume that $X$ is smooth, and that one of the following conditions holds.

(i) The group $G$ is trigonalisable.
(ii) Every fiber of $f$ has dimension ${<}p-1$ , and $\operatorname{char}k\neq p$ .

Assume the image of $f_{\ast }:\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y)/p\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)/p$ contains the class $[X]$ . Then the morphism $(f^{G})_{\ast }:\operatorname{CH}(Y^{G})/p\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(X^{G})/p$ is surjective.

Proof. If $T\rightarrow X$ is a morphism, respectively $x\in X$ is a point, we will denote by $f_{T}:Y_{T}\rightarrow T$ , respectively $f_{x}:Y_{x}\rightarrow \operatorname{Spec}k(x)$ , the base-change of $f$ .

We first prove that for any point $x\in X^{G}$ the morphism

(6a)

is surjective. Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\prime }\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y)$ be such that $f_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\prime })=[X]\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(X)/p$ , and let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in \operatorname{CH}(Y)$ be the image of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\prime }$ . Let $R$ be the reduced closure of $x$ in $X$ . Since $f_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})=[X]\in \operatorname{CH}(X)/p$ , for any $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\in \operatorname{CH}(R)/p$ we have by the projection formula [Reference FultonFul98, 8.1.1.c]

(6b)

$$\begin{eqnarray}(f_{R})_{\ast }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot _{f}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE})=(f_{\ast }\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC})\cdot _{\operatorname{id}_{X}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\in \operatorname{CH}(R)/p.\end{eqnarray}$$

Let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\prime }\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(R)$ be a preimage of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ (the morphism $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(R)\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(R)$ is surjective because $G$ acts trivially on $R$ ). Then the element $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}^{\prime }\cdot _{f}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}^{\prime }\in \operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y_{R})$ constructed in § 3.2.6 is a preimage of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot _{f}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\in \operatorname{CH}(Y_{R})$ . In view of (6b), this proves that the composite $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y_{R})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(Y_{R})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(R)/p$ is surjective. Let $r=\dim R$ . We may find a $G$ -invariant open subscheme $W$ of a finite-dimensional $G$ -representation over $k$ whose complement has codimension greater than $\dim Y_{x}=\dim Y_{R}-r$ , such that $G$ acts freely on $W$ . Let $w=\dim W$ . It follows from [Reference Elman, Karpenko and MerkurjevEKM08, Propositions 49.18 and 49.20] that we have a commutative diagram (where $W_{k(x)}=W\times _{k}\operatorname{Spec}k(x)$ ).

The right vertical morphism is surjective by the localisation sequence [Reference FultonFul98, Proposition 1.8] and [Reference Elman, Karpenko and MerkurjevEKM08, Proposition 52.9]. The upper horizontal composite may be identified with the degree $r$ component of the composite $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y_{R})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(Y_{R})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(R)$ . The lower horizontal composite may be identified with the degree-zero component of the composite $\operatorname{CH}_{G}(Y_{x})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(Y_{x})\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(\operatorname{Spec}k(x))$ . Since the former is surjective modulo $p$ , so is the latter, proving that (6a) is surjective.

We now prove that for any closed subscheme $S$ of $X^{G}$ , the morphism $\operatorname{CH}((Y_{S})^{G})/p\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(S)/p$ is surjective. The theorem will then follow from the case $S=X^{G}$ . We proceed by noetherian induction, the case $S=\varnothing$ being clear. Let $s$ be a generic point of $S$ . For any closed subscheme $Z$ of $S$ not containing $s$ , we have a commutative diagram with exact rows, where $U=S-Z$ (see [Reference FultonFul98, Propositions 1.7 and 1.8]).

By induction the left vertical morphism is surjective, hence so is its colimit over the closed subschemes $Z$ not containing $s$ . In view of Theorem 4.4 in case (i) and Theorem 5.2.3(ii) in case (ii), the surjectivity of (6a) for $x=s$ implies that $\operatorname{CH}((Y_{s})^{G})/p\rightarrow \operatorname{CH}(\operatorname{Spec}k(s))/p=\mathbb{F}_{p}$ is also surjective. The latter morphism may be identified with the colimit of the right vertical morphism in the above diagram. We conclude that the middle vertical morphism is surjective, as required.◻

Remark 6.2. The conclusion of the theorem implies the following.

(i) The morphism $f^{G}$ is surjective, and in particular $\dim Y^{G}\geqslant \dim X^{G}$ .
(ii) If $X^{G}$ is projective and possesses a closed point of degree $n$ , then $Y^{G}$ possesses a closed point of some degree $m$ whose $p$ -adic valuation satisfies $v_{p}(m)\leqslant v_{p}(n)$ .
(iii) If $X^{G}$ is smooth (for instance if $p\neq \operatorname{char}k$ by [Reference Conrad, Gabber and PrasadCGP15, Proposition A.8.10(2)]), then the $\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ -module $\operatorname{CH}(X^{G})\,\otimes \,\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a direct summand of $\operatorname{CH}(Y^{G})\,\otimes \,\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ . More generally $H(X^{G})\,\otimes \,\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ is a direct summand of $H(Y^{G})\,\otimes \,\mathbb{Z}_{(p)}$ when $H$ is a cohomology theory such as motivic cohomology, $K$ -theory or algebraic cobordism (see [Reference HautionHau13, Conditions 3.1, Lemma 4.1] for precise conditions).

Acknowledgement

I thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading and constructive comments.

Footnotes

The author is supported by the DFG grant HA 7702/1-1 and Heisenberg fellowship HA 7702/4-1.

1 Contrary to what is stated in [Reference Esnault, Levine and WittenbergELW15, just before Theorem 5.1] and in [Reference ThomTho95, §5], it is necessary to add an inverse to the classes of zero-dimensional varieties in order to obtain a group.

References

Adams, J. F., Stable homotopy and generalised homology, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1974).Google Scholar

Artin, M., Versal deformations and algebraic stacks , Invent. Math. 27 (1974), 165–189.Google Scholar

Brosnan, P., Steenrod operations in Chow theory , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 355 (2003), 1869–1903.Google Scholar

Browder, W., Pulling back fixed points , Invent. Math. 87 (1987), 331–342.Google Scholar

Conrad, B., Gabber, O. and Prasad, G., Pseudo-reductive groups, New Mathematical Monographs, vol. 26, second edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015).Google Scholar

Demazure, M. and Gabriel, P., Groupes algébriques. Tome I: Géométrie algébrique, généralités, groupes commutatifs (Masson, Paris, 1970).Google Scholar

Edidin, D. and Graham, W., Equivariant intersection theory , Invent. Math. 131 (1998), 595–634.Google Scholar

Grothendieck, A., Éléments de géométrie algébrique. II. Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de morphismes , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 8 (1961), 5–222.Google Scholar

Grothendieck, A., Éléments de géométrie algébrique. IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes de schémas. III , Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 28 (1966), 5–255.Google Scholar

Elman, R., Karpenko, N. A. and Merkurjev, A. S., The algebraic and geometric theory of quadratic forms (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2008).Google Scholar

Esnault, H., Levine, M. and Wittenberg, O., Index of varieties over Henselian fields and Euler characteristic of coherent sheaves , J. Algebraic Geom. 24 (2015), 693–718.Google Scholar

Fulton, W. and Lang, S., Riemann–Roch algebra, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 277 (Springer, New York, NY, 1985).Google Scholar

Fulton, W., Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics, vol. 2, second edition (Springer, Berlin, 1998).Google Scholar

Gillet, H., K-theory and intersection theory , in Handbook of K-theory, Vol. 1 (Springer, Berlin, 2005), 235–293.Google Scholar

Haution, O., Integrality of the Chern character in small codimension , Adv. Math. 231 (2012), 855–878.Google Scholar

Haution, O., Invariants of upper motives , Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 1555–1572.Google Scholar

Haution, O., Diagonalisable p-groups acting on projective varieties cannot fix exactly one point, Preprint (2016), arXiv:1612.07663.Google Scholar

Levine, M. and Morel, F., Algebraic cobordism, Springer Monographs in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 2007).Google Scholar

Liu, Q., Algebraic geometry and arithmetic curves, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 6 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002); translated from the French original.Google Scholar

Merkurjev, A. S., Algebraic oriented cohomology theories , in Algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 300 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002), 171–193.Google Scholar

Mumford, D., Fogarty, J. and Kirwan, F., Geometric invariant theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (2), vol. 34, third edition (Springer, Berlin, 1994).Google Scholar

Mumford, D., Abelian varieties, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, vol. 5, corrected reprint of second 1974 edition (Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, 2008).Google Scholar

Quillen, D., Higher algebraic K-theory. I , in Algebraic K-theory, I: Higher K-theories, Seattle, WA, 1972, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 341 (Springer, Berlin, 1973), 85–147.Google Scholar

Reichstein, Z. and Youssin, B., Essential dimensions of algebraic groups and a resolution theorem for G-varieties , Canad. J. Math. 52 (2000), 1018–1056.Google Scholar

Rost, M., On Frobenius, K-theory, and characteristic numbers, Preprint (2008), http://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/∼rost/frobenius.html.Google Scholar

Serre, J.-P., How to use finite fields for problems concerning infinite fields , in Arithmetic, geometry, cryptography and coding theory, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 487 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009), 183–193.Google Scholar

Demazure, M. and Grothendieck, A. (eds), Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie – 1962–64– Schémas en groupes (SGA 3). Tome I. Propriétés générales des schémas en groupes, Documents Mathématiques, vol. 7, Revised and annotated edition (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2011).Google Scholar

Berthelot, P., Grothendieck, A. and Illusie, L. (eds), Séminaire de Géométrie Algébrique du Bois Marie – 1966–67 – Théorie des intersections et théorème de Riemann-Roch (SGA 6), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 225 (Springer, Berlin, 1971).Google Scholar

Starr, J. M., Arithmetic over function fields , in Arithmetic geometry, Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 8 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009), 375–418.Google Scholar

Thom, R., Travaux de Milnor sur le cobordisme, Séminaire Bourbaki, vol. 5, exp. 180 (Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 1995), 169–177.Google Scholar

Thomason, R. W., Algebraic K-theory of group scheme actions , in Algebraic topology and algebraic K-theory (Princeton, NJ), Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 113 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1987), 539–563.Google Scholar

Article contents

Fixed point theorems involving numerical invariants

Abstract

Keywords

MSC classification

Introduction

1 Statement of results

1.1 Equivariant cycles and Chern numbers

1.2 Equivariant modules and the cobordism ring

Remark 1.2.3 (Corollary 1.2.2 has a converse).

1.3 Browder’s theorem

2 Group actions on varieties

2.1 Algebraic groups

2.1.1 The order of a group

2.1.2 Constant finite groups

2.1.3 Diagonalisable groups

2.1.4 Unipotent groups

2.1.5 Trigonalisable groups

2.2 Fixed locus and quotient

2.2.1 Invariant subschemes

2.2.2 Fixed locus

2.2.3 Quotient

2.2.4

2.3 Free actions

2.4 Equivariant modules

2.4.2

2.4.3

2.4.4

2.4.7

2.4.8

3 Algebraic cycles

3.1 Grothendieck groups

3.1.1

3.1.2

3.1.3

3.1.4

3.2 Chow groups

3.2.1

3.2.2

3.2.3

3.2.4

3.2.6

3.3 Purely transcendental extensions

3.4 An equivariant theory

4 The degree of equivariant cycles

5 The Euler characteristic of equivariant modules

5.1 Dual cyclic groups

5.2 Varieties of small dimension

5.3 Characteristic $p$

6 Browder’s theorem

Acknowledgement

Footnotes

References

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests