Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:41:38.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Best practices for working with heritage language learners in the K-12 language classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2022

Jamie Morgan*
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, USA
Mathilda Reckford
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, USA
Leslie Fink
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, USA
Francesca Di Silvio
Affiliation:
Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Research in Progress
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

In this summary, we present research on best practices and educator needs for working with heritage language learners (HLLs) in kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12) language classrooms, which resulted in a Quick Reference Guide (QRG) to support teachers’ implementation of the 2021 Massachusetts World Languages Framework. This research is one component of a project to develop resources for various less commonly taught world language courses and programs, including world language courses for HLLs, in order to maximize the Framework's applicability and inclusivity.

2. Background

Although the number of HLLs in the United States continues to increase (Kagan & Dillon, Reference Kagan, Dillon, Deusen-Scholl and Hornberger2008), there are few K-12 schools that offer heritage-specific courses, leading to an increasing number of mixed classrooms in which HLLs are placed with second language (L2) learners. As these two groups of students have different abilities and proficiency profiles (Montrul, Reference Montrul2010), HLLs are often described as being at a disadvantage in traditional world language courses (Carreira & Chik, Reference Carreira, Chik and Potowski2018). It is therefore imperative that K-12 world language teachers develop an understanding of how to best meet the needs of HLLs.

To ensure that the 2021 Massachusetts World Languages Framework is actionable, inclusive, and relevant to educators working with HLLs, the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education contracted the Center for Applied Linguistics to conduct research on best practices and educator needs for working with HLLs in K-12 language classrooms. The research presented in this poster investigated three research questions: (1) What do teachers of HLLs need to ensure that the Framework is actionable and relevant for their teaching context? (2) What are best practices for standards implementation, instruction, and assessment in world language courses for HLLs? And (3) what topics should be addressed in the QRG to support Framework implementation in this context.

For the purposes of this research, we defined an HLL as ‘a student who is raised in a home where a non-English language is spoken, who speaks or merely understands the heritage language and who is to some degree bilingual in English and the heritage language’ (Valdés, Reference Valdés and Kagan2000), though it is important to note that HLLs may have different degrees of exposure to the language, and different areas where they demonstrate more knowledge or familiarity with the language or culture.

3. Methods

Information was gathered from a literature review and two virtual focus groups with Massachusetts world language educators who have worked with HLLs.

The first focus group, held over Zoom in June 2020 with five educators, was designed to gather feedback on a draft of the Framework, predict difficulties in implementing the new standards, and identify initial recommendations for the QRG. Following this focus group, we conducted the literature review, focusing on effective instructional practices and supports needed for the implementation and application of world language standards when working with HLLs.

The second focus group, held over Zoom in November 2020 with four educators, was designed to gather feedback on how information in the literature review should inform the development of the QRG. Following this focus group, we developed the QRG, which includes four sections based on the literature review, callout boxes with key information, supportive graphics, and comprehensible and actionable recommendations.

4. Focus group findings: Educator needs

Findings from the focus groups suggest that educators working with HLLs in K-12 language classrooms need a shared understanding of the definition and profile of HLLs; guidance for developing effective placement testing and assessment practices, addressing learner diversity, and exploring and reflecting on identity; and a greater emphasis on culture, community, and the importance of differentiated instruction in world language frameworks.

Participants agreed that all educators need to recognize what it means to be an HLL and that they would benefit from having a single, shared understanding of this population for the purposes of identification, instruction, and assessment. Participants expressed difficulties placing students into appropriate courses, as the range of HLLs’ abilities may not correspond with the proficiency levels and expected student outcomes described in world language frameworks. Participants also highlighted further considerations that should be made in world language frameworks related to learner diversity. As these frameworks are not explicitly designed for HLLs, participants agreed that educators must understand how to adapt and personalize them to best meet the needs of this population, and it is therefore important for frameworks to also provide guidance on how to address the unique backgrounds and skills that HLLs bring to the classroom, including different language varieties, community experiences, and cultural or generational perspectives.

Participants also underscored the importance of identity, and they argued that without greater attention to identity, HLLs cannot make the cultural connections described in world language frameworks. The significance of culture was further emphasized by participants when reacting to the literature review, and they expressed a desire for more practical guidance on incorporating culturally-appropriate topics/activities and using community-based service learning to address different standards. Participants also agreed that educators would benefit from strategies and templates for personalizing lessons, activities, and assessments to support differentiated and individualized instruction for HLLs in their classrooms.

5. Literature review findings: Best practices

Findings from the literature review highlight various best practices for working with HLLs in K-12 language classrooms, including effective instructional practices and approaches; strategies and considerations for teaching and assessing world language standards; supporting learner diversity in the classroom; and addressing issues of identity.

Educators are encouraged to get to know HLLs in their classroom by administering informal surveys to learn about their backgrounds and experiences (Douglas, Reference Douglas2005), and macro-based approaches to instruction are recommended for leveraging HLLs existing abilities in the language (Carreira & Kagan, Reference Carreira and Kagan2018). In recent years, the multiliteracies approach, the community-based service-learning approach, and the critical language awareness approach have been increasingly referenced in the literature on heritage language teaching and learning (Parra, Reference Parra, Trifonnas and Aravossitas2014), and elements of these pedagogical approaches may be helpful to include when teaching HLLs the less commonly taught standards of Cultures, Comparisons, Connections, and Communities. In addition to world language standards, educators may find it helpful to use heritage-specific goals (as cited in Martinez, Reference Martinez, Fairclough and Beaudrie2016, p. 42) to guide instruction, and classroom content, expected learning outcomes, and teaching strategies should be modified to best meet the needs of HLLs (Carreira & Chik, Reference Carreira, Chik and Potowski2018).

To support learner diversity, it is important to provide students with opportunities to engage in multilingual/multimodal communication throughout the course of instruction (Parra, Reference Parra, Trifonnas and Aravossitas2014), and educators are encouraged to teach about different language varieties rather than only focusing on standard varieties in the classroom (Correa, Reference Correa2011). Recognizing and supporting the linguistic and cultural backgrounds of all learners is essential for effectively working with HLLs in K-12 language classrooms, and it is important to have an assets-based approach to working with these learners and placing them into appropriate courses. Although HLLs bring substantial knowledge to the world language classroom, educators are advised to avoid assigning them tutoring roles, as this can impedetheir own language development(Burgo, Reference Burgo2017). HLLs benefit from scaffolding, individualized goals, and mutually beneficial paired activities with L2 learner peers to promote self-confidence and help them further develop their knowledge of and abilities in the heritage language (Albirini, Reference Albirini2014).

Educators are also encouraged to build upon HLLs’ existing English literacy skills to support their acquisition of literacy skills in the heritage language, and it may be helpful to use pre-writing exercises and low-stakes writing activities about familiar topics when working with this population (Chevalier, Reference Chevalier2004). Finally, researchers recommend that students engage in critical dialogue about language's role in their lives and their communities to support their recognition and analysis of larger issues associated with the heritage language (Beaudrie et al., Reference Beaudrie, Amezcua and Loza2020).

6. Discussion and implications

Findings from this research indicate that key topics in working with HLLs in K-12 language classrooms include modifying and applying world language standards and appropriate instructional approaches; addressing learning diversity and identity; and recognizing and examining the social, political, and ideological contexts surrounding the language. Overall, findings indicate that educators working with this population require additional supports to effectively implement world language frameworks and that they would benefit from supplementary materials and actionable recommendations to meet their students’ needs. Findings also suggest that, when developing resources to support world language courses for HLLs, it is important to gather information from educators working with this population to capture the specific needs of students within the school, district, or state. Based on these findings, we developed the Heritage Language QRG to support educators in using the 2021 Massachusetts World Languages Framework. It provides information about effective instructional approaches, addressing various standards, supporting learner diversity, and addressing issues of identity, along with a list of overall recommendations. To view the QRG, visit: https://www.doe.mass.edu/worldlanguages/support/qrg-heritage.docx.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000258

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted as part of a larger project funded by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Jamie Morgan is a Project Manager in the Language Assessment Division at the Center for Applied Linguistics Washington, DC, where she manages projects related to assessment, research, and professional development.

Mathilda Reckford is a Research Assistant in the Language Assessment Division at the Center for Applied Linguistics Washington, DC, where she contributes to projects related to assessment, research, and professional development.

Leslie Fink is a Research Assistant in the Language Assessment Division at the Center for Applied Linguistics Washington, DC, where she contributes to projects related to assessment, research, and professional development.

Francesca Di Silvio is the Director of World Languages in the Language Assessment Division at the Center for Applied Linguistics Washington, DC, where she leads projects in assessment, research, and professional development.

Footnotes

1

A reproduction of the poster discussed is available in the supplementary material published alongside this article on Cambridge Core.

References

Albirini, A. (2014). The role of the colloquial varieties in the acquisition of the standard variety: The case of Arabic heritage speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 447463. doi:10.1111/flan.12087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaudrie, S., Amezcua, A., & Loza, S. (2020). Critical language awareness in the heritage language classroom: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a curricular intervention. International Multilingual Research Journal, 15 (1), 6181. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2020.1753931Google Scholar
Burgo, C. (2017). Meeting student needs: Integrating Spanish heritage language learners into the second language classroom. Hispania, 100(5), 4550. doi:10.1353/hpn.2018.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreira, M., & Chik, C. H. (2018). Differentiated teaching: A primer for heritage and mixed classes. In Potowski, K. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of Spanish as a heritage language (pp. 359374). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreira, M., & Kagan, O. (2018). Heritage language education: A proposal for the next 50 years. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 152168. doi:10.1111/flan.12331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, J. F. (2004). Heritage language literacy: Theory and practice. Heritage Language Journal, 2(1), 119. doi:10.46538/hlj.2.1.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, M. (2011). Advocating for critical pedagogical approaches to teaching Spanish as a heritage language: Some considerations. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 308320. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01132.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. (2005). Pedagogical theories and approaches to teach young learners of Japanese as a heritage language. Heritage Language Journal, 3(1), 6082. doi:10.46538/hlj.3.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, O., & Dillon, K. (2008). Issues in heritage language learning in the United States. In Deusen-Scholl, N. V., & Hornberger, N. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Volume 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 143156). Springer.Google Scholar
Martinez, G. (2016). Goals and beyond in heritage language education. In Fairclough, M., & Beaudrie, S. (Eds.), Innovative strategies for heritage language teaching: A practical guide for the classroom (pp. 3955). Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2010). Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 323. doi:10.1017/S0267190510000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parra, M. L. (2014). Strengthening our teacher community: Consolidating a ‘signature pedagogy’ for the teaching of Spanish as a heritage language. In Trifonnas, P., & Aravossitas, T. (Eds.), Rethinking heritage language education (pp. 213236). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (2000). Teaching heritage languages: An introduction for slavic language-teaching professionals. In Kagan, O. (Ed.), Learning and teaching of Slavic languages and cultures: Toward the 21st century (pp. 375403). Slavica.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Morgan et al. supplementary material

Morgan et al. supplementary material

Download Morgan et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 2.3 MB