Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:34:05.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of shared decision-making on the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: systematic review – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2021

Tyler Marshall Open the ORCID record for Tyler Marshall [Opens in a new window] ,
Chelsea Stellick ,
Adam Abba-Aji ,
Richard Lewanczuk ,
Xin-Min Li ,
Karin Olson  and
Sunita Vohra
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Clinical governanceethicscomorbidityanxiety disordersdepressive disorders
Type
Corrigendum
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 7 , Issue 6 , November 2021 , e212
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

In the original publication,1 a minor typographical error was made in the abstract. The first sentence of the conclusion in the abstract had a comma instead of a period as shown below “… without consultation time. but appears unlikely…”. This has now been corrected in both the online PDF and HTML versions of this article. The authors apologise for this error.

References

Marshall, T., Stellick, C., Abba-Aji, A., Lewanczuk, R., Li, X., Olson, K., & Vohra, S. (2021). The impact of shared decision-making on the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: Systematic review. BJPsych Open, 7(6), E189. doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.