Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:19:57.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction in women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2009

Emily B. Levitan ,
Murray A. Mittleman  and
Alicja Wolk
Emily B. Levitan*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, RPHB 230K, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL35294-0022, USA Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA02215, USA
Murray A. Mittleman
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA02215, USA Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA02115, USA
Alicja Wolk
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, StockholmSE-171 77, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author: Emily B. Levitan, fax +1 205 934 8665, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The association of dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) with CVD has been examined in several populations with varying results. We tested the hypothesis that women with diets high in GI or GL would have higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI), and the associations would be stronger in overweight women. We measured dietary GI and GL in 36 234 Swedish Mammography Cohort participants aged 48–83 years using FFQ. Cox models were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (RR) and 95 % CI for hospitalisation or death due to MI assessed using the Swedish inpatient and cause-of-death registers from 1 January 1998 until 31 December 2006. Over 9 years of follow-up, 1138 women were hospitalised or died due to a first MI. In multivariable-adjusted models, the RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GI were 1·12 (95 % CI 0·92, 1·35, P-trend = 0·24), and the RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GL were 1·22 (95 % CI 0·90, 1·65, P-trend = 0·23). Among overweight women, the RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GI were 1·20 (95 % CI 0·91, 1·58, P-trend = 0·22), and the RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GL were 1·45 (95 % CI 0·93, 2·25, P-trend = 0·16). There were no statistically significant associations of dietary GI or GL with MI in this population.

Keywords

Glycaemic indexGlycaemic loadMyocardial infarction
Type
Full Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 103 , Issue 7 , 14 April 2010 , pp. 1049 - 1055
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Glycaemic index (GI), the relative increase in blood glucose due to carbohydrate in a test food compared with a reference food, was initially developed as a meal planning tool for people with diabetes mellitus(Reference Jenkins, Wolever and Taylor1). More recently, there have been experimental and observational studies examining whether the carbohydrate quality influences the risk of CVD.

Randomised diet trials have demonstrated that diets with reduced GI or glycaemic load (GL), the product of GI and carbohydrate content of a food(Reference Brand-Miller, Thomas and Swan2, Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3), influence total cholesterol(Reference Rizkalla, Taghrid and Laromiguiere4–Reference McMillan-Price, Petocz and Atkinson6), LDL cholesterol(Reference Rizkalla, Taghrid and Laromiguiere4, Reference McMillan-Price, Petocz and Atkinson6, Reference Sloth, Krog-Mikkelsen and Flint7), HDL cholesterol(Reference Maki, Rains and Kaden8–Reference Luscombe, Noakes and Clifton10), TAG concentration(Reference Pereira, Swain and Goldfine11, Reference Ebbeling, Leidig and Sinclair12), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1(Reference Ebbeling, Leidig and Sinclair12), insulin resistance(Reference Rizkalla, Taghrid and Laromiguiere4, Reference Pereira, Swain and Goldfine11) and inflammation(Reference Pereira, Swain and Goldfine11, Reference Wolever, Gibbs and Mehling13, Reference Dickinson, Hancock and Petocz14) in ways that would be expected to reduce cardiovascular risk. A meta-analysis of trials showed that low-GI and -GL diets reduced BMI, total body mass and fat mass more than control diets(Reference Thomas, Elliott and Baur15), and a low-GL diet was better than a control diet for maintenance of weight loss(Reference Due, Larsen and Mu16), possibly because low-GI and -GL meals result in higher satiety and lower food intake(Reference Stevenson, Astbury and Simpson17, Reference Flint, Gregersen and Gluud18). In addition, low-GI or -GL diets improve glucose control in people with diabetes mellitus in randomised trials(Reference Jenkins, Kendall and McKeown-Eyssen9, Reference Brand-Miller, Hayne and Petocz19) and are associated with lower risk of developing diabetes mellitus in observational studies(Reference Krishnan, Rosenberg and Singer20–Reference Villegas, Liu and Gao22).

There have been several previous studies examining the association of dietary GI, the average GI of carbohydrates consumed, and dietary GL, the product of dietary GI and total carbohydrate, with CHD(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3, Reference Beulens, de Bruijne and Stolk23–Reference van Dam, Visscher and Feskens26). A meta-analysis that pooled data from prospective studies of men and women reported a statistically significant association(Reference Mente, de Koning and Shannon27). However, dietary GI and GL were associated with increased rates of CHD in women(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3, Reference Beulens, de Bruijne and Stolk23), but studies in men, including our previous report on a population of men from central Sweden have not shown an association(Reference Levitan, Mittleman and Hakansson24, Reference van Dam, Visscher and Feskens26).

We therefore conducted a prospective study of the association of dietary GI and GL with incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) in a population of middle-aged and older women from central Sweden. Dietary GI and GL were assessed using the same FFQ as in our previous study of men(Reference Levitan, Mittleman and Hakansson24). Because the associations of dietary GI and GL with CVD were stronger in overweight than normal weight women in some studies(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3, Reference Beulens, de Bruijne and Stolk23) possibly because of a greater prevalence of insulin resistance among overweight women, we tested for variation by BMI and by physical activity, another determinant of insulin sensitivity. We also examined the possibility of interaction of dietary GI and GL with fibre consumption, because dietary GL was associated with survival among men with established CVD only in the context of low fibre intake(Reference Levitan, Mittleman and Wolk28).

Methods

Population

The present study included 36 234 women who participated in the Swedish Mammography Cohort. The recruitment process, characteristics and study methods of this prospective cohort have been previously described(Reference Wolk, Larsson and Johansson29). The Swedish Mammography Cohort includes women born between 1914 and 1948 living in Västmanland and Uppsala counties in central Sweden. The women completed the questionnaires with items on demographic, behavioural and anthropometric factors and consumption of foods and beverages in late 1997. Participants who did not provide or provided incorrect national identification numbers, who reported implausible energy intakes (>3 sd from the natural logarithm-transformed mean) or who had a previous diagnosis of cancer (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) were excluded (n 792). Additionally for these analyses, participants who at baseline had a history of heart failure, MI or diabetes were excluded (n 2201). Participants with baseline diabetes were excluded because people who developed diabetes were received dietary counselling and may change both their diet and their reporting of diet. History of heart failure and MI was determined through linkage to the inpatient register; history of diabetes was assessed using self-report and linkage to the inpatient register. The present study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board at Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Completion and return of the self-administered questionnaire was taken to imply consent.

Diet assessment

Self-administered food-frequency items in the questionnaires asked participants to report usual frequency of consumption of ninety-six foods and beverages over the previous year. Participants reported servings/d or servings/week for commonly consumed foods and beverages such as milk, coffee, cheese and bread. For other foods there were eight predefined responses ranging from never to ≥ 3 times/d. Portion sizes for most foods were not specified. In validation studies using weighed diet records, habitual portion sizes were found to vary by age. The total consumption of foods and beverages was calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption by age-specific portion sizes. Nutrient values were calculated using food composition data from the Swedish National Food Administration(Reference Bergström, Kylberg and Hagman30).

A database of GI and GL values with white bread as the reference food was created based primarily on the international GI and GL tables(Reference Foster-Powell, Holt and Brand-Miller31). Food items and mixed meals with no reported GI value were assigned the value for a comparable food. We calculated average dietary GI using the formula:

where F represents the frequency of consumption, C represents the available carbohydrate content of an age-specific food portion and GI represents the GI of a specific food(Reference Salmeron, Manson and Stampfer32). Dietary GL was calculated as the product of dietary GI and total carbohydrate intake divided by 100(Reference Salmeron, Manson and Stampfer32). Using the residuals method(Reference Willett33), nutrient values and dietary GL were adjusted to 7113 kJ/d, the approximate mean energy intake from the validation study diet records. The correlation between the FFQ used in the present study and two 1-week weighed diet records was 0·62 for dietary GI and 0·77 for dietary GL in a population of men from central Sweden(Reference Levitan, Westgren and Liu34).

Outcome assessment

Participants were followed for hospitalisation due to or death from MI through record linkage to the Swedish inpatient and cause-of-death registers. These registers are more than 99 % complete(35). We included only hospitalisations or deaths with MI listed as the primary diagnosis and only the first MI event recorded in the registers for each individual. Follow-up time accrued from 1 January 1998 until the date of hospitalisation or death from MI, the date of death from other causes or 31 December 2006, whichever was earliest.

Statistical analysis

Because some of the participants were missing data needed to calculate BMI (1·6 %) and a physical activity score (22·1 %), we used Markov chain Monte Carlo multiple imputation to simulate five complete datasets(Reference Schafer36). All statistical analyses described were performed in each of the datasets separately. The results were averaged, and CI and P-values were calculated accounting for the uncertainty in the imputed estimates(Reference Schafer36).

We calculated means and proportions of baseline covariates. To estimate incidence rate ratios (RR) for the association of quartiles of dietary GI and GL with incidence of MI, we used Cox proportional hazards models that accounted for the effect of age by allowing the baseline rate to vary and adjusted for physical activity (linear term), BMI (linear term), cigarette smoking (current, past and never), living alone (yes, no), postmenopausal hormone use (yes, no), aspirin use (yes, no), education (less than high school, high school and university), family history of MI before 60 years (yes, no), self-reported history of hypertension (yes, no), self-reported history of high cholesterol (yes, no), total energy intake (linear term), alcohol intake (linear term), fibre intake (linear term), saturated fat (linear term), polyunsaturated fat (linear term) and protein (linear term). The dietary GI models were additionally adjusted for carbohydrate (linear term) to estimate the effect of varying the quality of the carbohydrate while holding the quantity constant. As a sensitivity analysis, we also estimated the RR associated with dietary GI without adjustment for carbohydrate. We tested for linear trend by entering the median in each quartile as a continuous variable. We performed additional analyses examining the association of available carbohydrate with MI events using models adjusted for the covariates listed earlier.

We examined the associations of dietary GI and GL with MI events in subpopulations defined by BMI ( < 25 v. ≥ 25 kg/m2), by physical activity (active ( ≥ 40 min/d walking or bicycling and ≥ 1 h/week exercising) v. inactive)(Reference Akesson, Weismayer and Newby37) and by fibre intake ( < 18·4 g/d (quartile 1) v. ≥ 18·4 g/d (quartiles 2–4)). We tested whether the associations varied across subpopulations using a likelihood ratio test with four df. We tested for violation of the assumption of proportional hazards by entering the product of the exposures and the natural logarithm of time in the models; we did not find evidence for violation of the assumption of proportional hazards. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis Systems version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A two-sided P-value < 0·05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Over 9 years of follow-up, 1138 women were hospitalised or died due to a first MI. Compared with women with dietary GI or GL in the lowest quartile, women with higher dietary GI or GL were on average older and were more likely to have a history of hypertension, to have a less than high school education and to be a nonsmoker (Table 1). They consumed less alcohol and less protein than women with low dietary GI or GL. In addition, women with high dietary GL were more likely to have a history of high cholesterol and consumed more fibre and less saturated and polyunsaturated fat than women with lower dietary GL.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics by quartile of dietary glycaemic index and load

(Mean values and standard deviations or percentage)

† Values are adjusted for energy using the residuals method.

There was a modest association between dietary GI and incidence of MI in age-adjusted analyses (RR comparing top to bottom quartile were 1·16, 95 % CI 0·98, 1·37, P-trend = 0·06), which was attenuated in multivariable-adjusted models (RR comparing top to bottom quartile were 1·12, 95 % CI 0·92, 1·35, P-trend = 0·24; Table 2). Results were similar when we did not adjust for carbohydrate intake. RR across quartiles were 1 (reference), 1·05 (95 % CI 0·88, 1·27), 1·10 (95 % CI 0·92, 1·32) and 1·11 (95 % CI 0·92, 1·34, P-trend = 0·27). There was a suggestion of a direct association between dietary GL and incidence of MI in multivariable-adjusted models, which was not statistically significant (RR comparing top to bottom quartile were 1·22, 95 % CI 0·90, 1·65, P-trend = 0·23). RR across quartiles of carbohydrate intake were 1 (reference), 0·90 (95 % CI 0·73, 1·11), 0·90 (95 % CI 0·70, 1·17) and 0·95 (95 % CI 0·67, 1·35, P-trend = 0·82).

Table 2 Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction

(Ratio rate and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Cox proportional hazards model accounting for age.

† Additionally adjusted for education (less than high school, high school and university), BMI (linear term), physical activity (linear term), cigarette smoking (current, past and never), living alone (yes, no), postmenopausal hormone use (yes, no), aspirin use (yes, no), total energy intake (linear term), alcohol intake (linear term), fibre intake (linear term), saturated fat (linear term), polyunsaturated fat (linear term), protein (linear term), carbohydrate (linear term, dietary glycaemic index only), family history of myocardial infarction before 60 years (yes, no), self-reported history of hypertension (yes, no) and self-reported history of high cholesterol (yes, no).

Although tests of interaction were not statistically significant, there was a trend towards an association of dietary GI and GL with rates of MI in overweight women (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) but not in normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2) women (P-interaction = 0·20 for dietary GI, P-interaction = 0·14 for dietary GL; Table 3). However, the associations of dietary GI and GL with MI appeared stronger in active women, though the differences were not statistically significant. The RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GI in the active women were 1·29 (95 % CI 0·86–1·95, P-trend = 0·22) and 1·06 (95 % CI 0·85–1·31, P-trend = 0·61) among inactive women (P-interaction = 0·18). The RR comparing top to bottom quartile of dietary GL were 1·42 (95 % CI 0·72, 2·79, P-trend = 0·38) in the active women and 1·14 (95 % CI 0·82, 1·60, P-trend = 0·46) in inactive women (P-interaction = 0·40). The association between dietary GI and MI was similar across levels of fibre intake (RR comparing top to bottom quartile among those with fibre < 18·4 g/d were 1·05, 95 % CI 0·74, 1·49, P-trend = 0·73; RR comparing top to bottom quartile among those with fibre ≥ 18·4 g/d were 1·14, 95 % CI 0·91, 1·42, P-trend = 0·28; P-interaction = 0·53). The association between dietary GL and MI also did not vary significantly by fibre intake (RR comparing top to bottom quartile among those with fibre < 18·4 g/d were 0·85, 95 % CI 0·49, 1·48, P-trend = 0·63; RR comparing top to bottom quartile among those with fibre ≥ 18·4 g/d were 1·41, 95 % CI 0·98, 2·05, P-trend = 0·09; P-interaction = 0·39).

Table 3 Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction by BMI

(Ratio rate and 95 % confidence intervals)

* Normal weight defined as BMI < 25 kg/m2; Overweight defined as ≥ 25 kg/m2. Cox proportional hazards model accounting for age and adjusted for education (less than high school, high school and university), BMI (linear term), physical activity (linear term), cigarette smoking (current, past and never), living alone (yes, no), postmenopausal hormone use (yes, no), aspirin use (yes, no), total energy intake (linear term), alcohol intake (linear term), fibre intake (linear term), saturated fat (linear term), polyunsaturated fat (linear term), protein (linear term), carbohydrate (linear term, dietary glycaemic index only), family history of myocardial infarction before 60 years (yes, no), self-reported history of hypertension (yes, no) and self-reported history of high cholesterol (yes, no).

Discussion

In the present study of middle-aged and older women, we did not find statistically significant associations of dietary GI and GL with MI. However, women in the top quartile of dietary GI had a nonsignificant 12 % higher rate of MI than those in the bottom quartile and women in the top quartile of dietary GL had a nonsignificant 22 % higher rate of MI than those in the bottom quartile. The associations may have been stronger in overweight women. The results are consistent with those observed in other populations of women.

In the Nurses' Health Study, women with dietary GI in the highest quintile had a 31 % higher rate of CHD, and women with dietary GL in the highest quintile had a 98 % higher rate of CHD(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3). The highest compared to the lowest quartile of dietary GI and GL was associated with 44 % higher rates of CHD in a study of Dutch women(Reference Beulens, de Bruijne and Stolk23). The associations tended to be stronger in heavier women in both the studies. In contrast, the two previous prospective studies of men did not find associations of dietary GI or GL with CHD(Reference Levitan, Mittleman and Hakansson24, Reference van Dam, Visscher and Feskens26). The associations between dietary GI and GL and MI appeared to be stronger in women than in men in a case-control study conducted in Italy(Reference Tavani, Bosetti and Negri25), but to our knowledge the interaction between dietary GI and GL and sex has not been evaluated in a prospective setting.

In the present study, the median dietary GL ranged from 131 in the lowest quartile to 184 in the highest. By comparison, the median dietary GL ranged from 117 in the lowest quintile to 206 in the highest in the Nurses' Health Study(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3) and from 78·5 in the lowest quartile to 121·8 in the highest using a glucose standard in a study of Dutch women (approximately 112 and 174 converted to a white bread standard)(Reference Beulens, de Bruijne and Stolk23). It is possible that the limited range of dietary GL in the present study prevented us from detecting a significant association. Populations also vary in which foods contribute most to dietary GL. Boiled or mashed potatoes and cold breakfast cereals were the most important contributors to dietary GL in the Nurses' Health Study(Reference Liu, Willett and Stampfer3); among Swedish men, white bread contributed the most to dietary GL, followed by boiled potatoes, crispbread and whole grain bread(Reference Levitan, Westgren and Liu34).

Experimental studies comparing diets with high and low GI or GL support a link with CVD. Feeding studies have shown numerous metabolic effects of high-GI or -GL diets that could increase the risk of CVD including alternations in lipid profiles(Reference Rizkalla, Taghrid and Laromiguiere4–Reference Ebbeling, Leidig and Sinclair12), inflammation(Reference Pereira, Swain and Goldfine11, Reference Wolever, Gibbs and Mehling13, Reference Dickinson, Hancock and Petocz14) and insulin resistance(Reference Rizkalla, Taghrid and Laromiguiere4, Reference Pereira, Swain and Goldfine11). The data on the effects of GI and GL on HDL cholesterol and TAG concentration suggest a possible explanation for the differences observed in men and women(Reference Levitan, Mittleman and Hakansson24). Diet trials have suggested that the decrease in HDL cholesterol and increase in TAG concentration caused by increased carbohydrate consumption may be greater in women than in men(Reference Knopp, Paramsothy and Retzlaff38). Additionally, elevated TAG concentration may be a stronger cardiovascular risk factor for women than for men(Reference Austin, Hokanson and Edwards39).

There are several important limitations of the present study. Our assessment of medical history and other covariates was based on self-report, which is inherently less reliable than clinical measurement. Correlations between the FFQ and weighed diet records were 0·62 for dietary GI and 0·77 for dietary GL in a population of Swedish men from the same region(Reference Levitan, Westgren and Liu34). However, dietary GI and GL were measured using FFQ with a simple procedure to match FFQ items to values in the published tables. A more sophisticated algorithm has been described, which is based on the frequency of consumption of the foods underlying the queried items(Reference Flood, Subar and Hull40). Using questionnaires to assess diet resulted in some exposure misclassification. If the misclassification of diet was unrelated to MI incidence, the results would likely be biased towards the null. However, this assumption was not verifiable with available data. As with all observational studies, we cannot rule out residual or unmeasured confounding that could account for the association of dietary GI and GL with MI.

In summary, there was no statistically significant association of dietary GI or GL with MI in women in this middle-aged and older population. However, there was a suggestion of a higher rate of MI among women with high dietary GI or GL, which was consistent with previous reports.

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by grants from the Swedish Research Council/Committee for Infrastructure and the Committee for Medicine, a grant from the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education and National Institutes of Health grant F32 HL091683 (supporting E. B. L.). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. E. B. L. and A. W. will serve as guarantors for the contents of the present paper. E. B. L., M. A. M. and A. W. were responsible for the study concept and design, the statistical analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript. A. W. was responsible for the data collection.

References

1Jenkins, DJ, Wolever, TM, Taylor, RH, et al. (1981) Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 34, 362–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Brand-Miller, JC, Thomas, M, Swan, V, et al. (2003) Physiological validation of the concept of glycemic load in lean young adults. J Nutr 133, 2728–2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Liu, S, Willett, WC, Stampfer, MJ, et al. (2000) A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 1455–1461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Rizkalla, SW, Taghrid, L, Laromiguiere, M, et al. (2004) Improved plasma glucose control, whole-body glucose utilization, and lipid profile on a low-glycemic index diet in type 2 diabetic men: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 27, 1866–1872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bouche, C, Rizkalla, SW, Luo, J, et al. (2002) Five-week, low-glycemic index diet decreases total fat mass and improves plasma lipid profile in moderately overweight nondiabetic men. Diabetes Care 25, 822–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6McMillan-Price, J, Petocz, P, Atkinson, F, et al. (2006) Comparison of 4 diets of varying glycemic load on weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction in overweight and obese young adults: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 166, 1466–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Sloth, B, Krog-Mikkelsen, I, Flint, A, et al. (2004) No difference in body weight decrease between a low-glycemic-index and a high-glycemic-index diet but reduced LDL cholesterol after 10-wk ad libitum intake of the low-glycemic-index diet. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Maki, KC, Rains, TM, Kaden, VN, et al. (2007) Effects of a reduced-glycemic-load diet on body weight, body composition, and cardiovascular disease risk markers in overweight and obese adults. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 724–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Jenkins, DJ, Kendall, CW, McKeown-Eyssen, G, et al. (2008) Effect of a low-glycemic index or a high-cereal fiber diet on type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA 300, 2742–2753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Luscombe, ND, Noakes, M & Clifton, PM (1999) Diets high and low in glycemic index versus high monounsaturated fat diets: effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. Eur J Clin Nutr 53, 473–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Pereira, MA, Swain, J, Goldfine, AB, et al. (2004) Effects of a low-glycemic load diet on resting energy expenditure and heart disease risk factors during weight loss. JAMA 292, 2482–2490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Ebbeling, CB, Leidig, MM, Sinclair, KB, et al. (2005) Effects of an ad libitum low-glycemic load diet on cardiovascular disease risk factors in obese young adults. Am J Clin Nutr 81, 976–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Wolever, TM, Gibbs, AL, Mehling, C, et al. (2008) The Canadian Trial of Carbohydrates in Diabetes (CCD), a 1-y controlled trial of low-glycemic-index dietary carbohydrate in type 2 diabetes: no effect on glycated hemoglobin but reduction in C-reactive protein. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Dickinson, S, Hancock, DP, Petocz, P, et al. (2008) High-glycemic index carbohydrate increases nuclear factor-kappaB activation in mononuclear cells of young, lean healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 1188–1193.Google ScholarPubMed
15Thomas, DE, Elliott, EJ & Baur, L (2007) Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD005105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Due, A, Larsen, TM, Mu, H, et al. (2008) Comparison of 3 ad libitum diets for weight-loss maintenance, risk of cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a 6-mo randomized, controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 1232–1241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Stevenson, EJ, Astbury, NM, Simpson, EJ, et al. (2009) Fat oxidation during exercise and satiety during recovery are increased following a low-glycemic index breakfast in sedentary women. J Nutr 139, 890–897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Flint, A, Gregersen, NT, Gluud, LL, et al. (2007) Associations between postprandial insulin and blood glucose responses, appetite sensations and energy intake in normal weight and overweight individuals: a meta-analysis of test meal studies. Br J Nutr 98, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Brand-Miller, J, Hayne, S, Petocz, P, et al. (2003) Low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 26, 2261–2267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Krishnan, S, Rosenberg, L, Singer, M, et al. (2007) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and cereal fiber intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in US black women. Arch Intern Med 167, 2304–2309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Schulze, MB, Liu, S, Rimm, EB, et al. (2004) Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 348–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Villegas, R, Liu, S, Gao, YT, et al. (2007) Prospective study of dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged Chinese women. Arch Intern Med 167, 2310–2316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Beulens, JW, de Bruijne, LM, Stolk, RP, et al. (2007) High dietary glycemic load and glycemic index increase risk of cardiovascular disease among middle-aged women: a population-based follow-up study. J Am Coll Cardiol 50, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Levitan, EB, Mittleman, MA, Hakansson, N, et al. (2007) Dietary glycemic index, dietary glycemic load, and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged and older Swedish men. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 1521–1526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Tavani, A, Bosetti, C, Negri, E, et al. (2003) Carbohydrates, dietary glycaemic load and glycaemic index, and risk of acute myocardial infarction. Heart 89, 722–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26van Dam, RM, Visscher, AW, Feskens, EJ, et al. (2000) Dietary glycemic index in relation to metabolic risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 726–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Mente, A, de Koning, L, Shannon, HS, et al. (2009) A systematic review of the evidence supporting a causal link between dietary factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 169, 659–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Levitan, EB, Mittleman, MA & Wolk, A (2009) Dietary glycemic index, dietary glycemic load and mortality among men with established cardiovascular disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 552–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Wolk, A, Larsson, SC, Johansson, JE, et al. (2006) Long-term fatty fish consumption and renal cell carcinoma incidence in women. JAMA 296, 1371–1376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Bergström, L, Kylberg, E, Hagman, U, et al. (1991) The food composition database KOST: the National Administration's information system for nutritive values of food. Var Foda 43, 439–447.Google Scholar
31Foster-Powell, K, Holt, SH & Brand-Miller, JC (2002) International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 5–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Salmeron, J, Manson, JE, Stampfer, MJ, et al. (1997) Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 277, 472–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Willett, WC (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Levitan, EB, Westgren, CW, Liu, S, et al. (2007) Reproducibility and validity of dietary glycemic index, dietary glycemic load, and total carbohydrate intake in 141 Swedish men. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 548–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35The Nation Board of Health and Welfare (2005) The Swedish Hospital Discharge Registry 1964–2003. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
36Schafer, JL (1997) Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Akesson, A, Weismayer, C, Newby, PK, et al. (2007) Combined effect of low-risk dietary and lifestyle behaviors in primary prevention of myocardial infarction in women. Arch Intern Med 167, 2122–2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38Knopp, RH, Paramsothy, P, Retzlaff, BM, et al. (2005) Gender differences in lipoprotein metabolism and dietary response: basis in hormonal differences and implications for cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 7, 472–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Austin, MA, Hokanson, JE & Edwards, KL (1998) Hypertriglyceridemia as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol 81, 7B–12B.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Flood, A, Subar, AF, Hull, SG, et al. (2006) Methodology for adding glycemic load values to the National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire database. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Baseline characteristics by quartile of dietary glycaemic index and load(Mean values and standard deviations or percentage)

Figure 1

Table 2 Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction(Ratio rate and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 2

Table 3 Dietary glycaemic index, dietary glycaemic load and incidence of myocardial infarction by BMI(Ratio rate and 95 % confidence intervals)