Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:58:18.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of an omega-3 fatty acid enriched supplement on physical performance in older women – a randomised double-blind placebo controlled study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2015

S. C. Dyall
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD UK
A. Carlisle
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD UK
E. L. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD UK
S. Strike
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London SW15 4JD UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Lower intake of the omega-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acid is associated with poorer functional mobility and supplementation improves walking speed in older females( Reference Hutchins-Wiese, Kleppinger and Annis 1 ). Slower gait can decrease quality of life and is a predictor of all-cause mortality( Reference Cummings, Studenski and Ferrucci 2 ). The present study assessed the effects of a high dose DHA supplement on walking speed and lower body strength and power in older females.

A stratified block randomisation design was used, matching frailty phenotypes between treatment groups( Reference Fried, Tangen and Walston 3 ). Participants received either Efalex Active 50+ (1 g DHA, 160 mg EPA, 240 mg gingko biloba, 60 mg phosphatidylserine, 20 mg d-alpha tocopherol, 1 mg folic acid and 20 μg vitamin B12 per day, N = 15), or placebo (N = 12) for six months. Participants undertook a detailed biomechanical analysis of self-selected habitual and fast walking and vertical jump height (VJH) at the start and end of the study. Blood DHA levels were also measured in non-fasted subjects by pin prick analysis (expressed as % of total fatty acids)( Reference Metherel, Buzikievich and Charkhzarin 4 ).

Abbreviations: PV, predictor variable; RC, regression coefficient; SC, standardised coefficient

Supplementation resulted in significantly higher blood DHA levels compared to the placebo group (mean 3·5% (SD 1·3%) vs 3·3% (1·0%), respectively, F(1,26) = 5·9, P = 0·02) adjusted for baseline values (3·0% (1·1%) vs. 3·26% (1·1%), respectively). Since individuals respond differently to omega-3 fatty acid supplementation( Reference Plourde, Vohl and Vandal 5 ), multiple linear regression models were used to analyse the relationship between % changes in DHA blood status and % changes in physical performance in both groups compared to baseline values. Also included in the models were age, BMI, self-reported physical activity (PASE)( Reference Washburn, Smith and Jette 6 ) and grip strength. Changes in DHA were significantly associated with both fast walking speed and VJH (Table), but not self-selected habitual walking speed. BMI and age were also significant contributory factors for fast walking speed in placebo and active treatment groups, respectively (Table); however, there were no significant effects for grip strength or PASE.

Short-term supplementation with an enriched DHA supplement was associated with significant increases in blood DHA content and there were significant positive relationships between increased DHA status and improved fast walking speed and VJH. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in these effects between the groups, suggesting the effects were mediated via changes in DHA, rather than the other components in the treatment. Further work will seek to explore the nature of this relationship. However, these effects were seen in the absence of an anabolic stimulus, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for DHA in improving functional mobility and power in the older adult.

This work was supported by Efamol Ltd/Wassen Intl Ltd.

References

1. Hutchins-Wiese, HL, Kleppinger, A, Annis, K, et al. (2013). J Nutr Health Aging. 17, 7680.Google Scholar
2. Cummings, SR, Studenski, S, Ferrucci, L. (2014). JAMA. 311, 2061–2.Google Scholar
3. Fried, LP, Tangen, CM, Walston, J, et al. (2001). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 56, M14656.Google Scholar
4. Metherel, AH, Buzikievich, LM, Charkhzarin, P, et al. (2013). Nutr Res. 32, 547–56.Google Scholar
5. Plourde, M, Vohl, MC, Vandal, M, et al. (2009). Br J Nutr. 102, 1121–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Washburn, RA, Smith, KW, Jette, AM, et al. (1993). J Clin Epidemiol. 46, 153–62.Google Scholar