Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:53:43.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MTHFR genotype and it's interaction with riboflavin in relation to blood pressure increase during normal pregnancy; preliminary findings from the OptiPREG project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

E. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
E. Psara
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
K. Pentieva
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
M. Ward
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
G. Horigan
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
L. Doherty
Affiliation:
Causeway Hospital, The Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Coleraine
K. Glackin
Affiliation:
Altnagelvin Hospital, The Western Health and Social Care Trust, Derry.
H. McNulty
Affiliation:
Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Hypertension in pregnancy (i.e. systolic/diastolic BP of 140/90 mmHg, as in non-pregnant adults) affects 10–15% of pregnancies and is of concern because it can lead to more serious hypertensive disorders in pregnancy(Reference Bramham1). The typical pattern of blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy is one of an initial small decrease until 16 weeks, followed by an increase to the end of pregnancy(Reference Oostvogels2). The common 677C→T polymorphism in the MTHFR gene is associated with an increased risk of hypertension in pregnancy(Reference Yang3), however previous trials from this Centre in non-pregnant hypertensive adults have shown that riboflavin can lower BP specifically in those with the MTHFR 677TT genotype(Reference McNulty4). In a previous opportunistic study based on BP retrospectively recovered from medical notes, we observed higher BP in women with the TT genotype during pregnancy(Reference O'Sullivan5). Therefore, in the current study we hypothesised that pregnant women with the TT genotype will undergo a greater increase in BP during pregnancy and that this will be modulated by riboflavin status.

Data for this study were generated from the ongoing Optimal Nutrition for the Prevention of Hypertension (OptiPREG) project. Pregnant women were recruited at the 14th GW from antenatal clinics at Causeway hospital and the community in the Northern Trust, and Altnagelvin Hospital in the Western Trust in Northern Ireland. They were screened for the MTHFR 677C→T genotype and BP measured according to the NICE guidelines. A blood sample was also collected to measure biomarker status of riboflavin using the erythrocyte gluthathione reductase activation coefficient (EGRac) assay.

These preliminary results suggest that women with the TT genotype and low riboflavin status undergo a markedly greater increase in systolic BP from the 14th to the 36th GW (Table 1). A similar trend was also seen in diastolic BP but this did not reach significance. A randomised controlled trial is necessary to investigate the effect of riboflavin intervention on BP during pregnancy in women with the TT genotype; this is underway at our Centre with results from the trial expected in early 2019.

Table 1. Systolic blood pressure at the 14GW and the change at 36GW by MTHFR genotype and riboflavin status

* Change is calculated on the difference between BP at 14GW and 36GW.

Blood pressure change expressed as adjusted means and SEM, with adjustments for BMI and maternal age.

'Low' and ‘high’ refer to riboflavin categories were established by using the median value for the biomarker of riboflavin status, erythrocyte glutathione reductase activation coefficient (EGRac).

Abbreviations; GW gestational week.

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding through an Enabling Award from the Northern Ireland HSC Public Health Agency, Research & Development Division.

References

1.Bramham, et al. (2014) BMJ 348, g2301.Google Scholar
2.Oostvogels, et al. (2017) PloS One 19, e01775547.Google Scholar
3.Yang, et al. (2014) PLoS ONE 9(2), e87497.Google Scholar
4.McNulty, et al. (2017) Mol Aspects Med 53, 29.Google Scholar
5.O'Sullivan, et al. (2017) Proc Nutr Soc 76(OCE3), E51.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Systolic blood pressure at the 14GW and the change at 36GW by MTHFR genotype and riboflavin status