Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and Snidal, Duncan. “The Concept of Legalization.” International Organization 54, no. 3 (2000): 401–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54, no. 3 (2000): 421–56. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42, no. 1 (1998): 3–32.Google Scholar

Abebe, Daniel, and Ginsburg, Tom. “The Dejudicialization of International Politics?” International Studies Quarterly 63, no. 3 (2019): 521–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz032.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58, no. 2 (2004): 239–75.Google Scholar

Addo, Michael K., and Grief, Nicholas. “Does Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights Enshrine Absolute Rights?” European Journal of International Law 9, no. 3 (1998): 510–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/9.3.510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aksenova, Marina, and Marchuk, Iryna. “Reinventing or Rediscovering International Law? The Russian Constitutional Court’s Uneasy Dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 4 (2018): 1322–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alford, Roger P. “The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: International Adjudication in Ascendance.” Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 94 (2000): 160–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027250370005549X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allhoff, Fritz. Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, and Quinn, Gerard. “The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 9, no. 2 (1987): 156–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/762295.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. “Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 1 (2008): 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087769.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. “‘Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Del’ by Karen J. Alter.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71, no. 1 (2008).Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J. “The Evolution of International Law and Courts.” The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, March 17, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Alter, Karen J., and Helfer, Laurence R.. “Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice.” International Organization 64, no. 4 (2010): 563–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818310000238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Gathii, James T., and Helfer, Laurence R.. “Backlash against International Courts in West, East and Southern Africa: Causes and Consequences.” European Journal of International Law 27, no. 2 (2016): 293–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chw019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen J., Helfer, Laurence R., and Madsen, Mikael. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016): 1–36.Google Scholar

Altwicker, Tilmann. “Switzerland: The Substitute Constitution in Times of Popular Dissent.” In Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights: Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level, edited by Popelier, Patricia, Lemmens, Koen, and Lambrecht, Sarah, 385–411. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anagnostou, Dia. “The Strasbourg Court, Democracy and the Protection of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities.” In The European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in National Context, edited by Anagnostou, Dia and Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia, 1–26. Leiden and Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2010.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, 1st edition. New York: Penguin Classics, 2006.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, Oddný Mjöll. “The Brighton Aftermath and the Changing Role of the European Court of Human Rights.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018), 223–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idx002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arold, Nina-Louisa. The Legal Culture of the European Court of Human Rights. Leiden and Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Association for the Prevention of Torture. “The Definition of Torture: Proceedings of an Expert Seminar.” Geneva, November 10, 2001.Google Scholar

Aubrey, Stefan M. The New Dimension of International Terrorism. Zurich: VDF Hochschulverlag AG, 2004.Google Scholar

Aydinli, Ersel. “Between Security and Liberalization: Decoding Turkey’s Struggle with the PKK.” Security Dialogue 33, no. 2 (2002): 209–25.Google Scholar

Baer, Madeline. Stemming the Tide: Human Rights and Water Policy in a Neoliberal World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bantekas, Ilias, and Oette, Lutz. International Human Rights Law and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Catherine Corey. “Tackling the Evaluation Challenge in Human Rights: Assessing the Impact of Strategic Litigation Organisations.” The International Journal of Human Rights 16, no. 3 (2012): 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael, and Coleman, Liv. “Designing Police: Interpol and the Study of Change in International Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 49, no. 4 (2005): 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. “The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations.” International Organization 53, no. 4 (1999): 699–732.Google Scholar

Basoğlu, Metin, ed. Torture and Its Definition in International Law: An Interdisciplinary Approach. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Ed. “The Birth of the European Convention on Human Rights – and the European Court of Human Rights.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 17–42. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Ed. The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgärtel, Moritz. Demanding Rights: Europe’s Supranational Courts and the Dilemma of Migrant Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgärtel, Moritz. “Facing the Challenge of Migratory Vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 38, no. 1 (2020): 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919898127.Google Scholar

Baxter, Richard Reeve “International Law in ‘Her Infinite Variety.’” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 29, no. 4 (1980): 549–66.Google Scholar

Becket, James. “The Greek Case before the European Human Rights Commission.” Human Rights 1, no. 1 (1970): 91–117.Google Scholar

Ben-Josef Hirsch, Michal, and Dixon, Jennifer M.. “Conceptualizing and Assessing Norm Strength in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 27 no. 2 (2021): 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120949628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Tobias. Global Norms and Local Courts: Translating the Rule of Law in Bangladesh. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Jessica L., and Hofmann, Stephanie C.. “Varieties of Neutrality: Norm Revision and Decline.” Cooperation and Conflict 46, no. 3 (2011): 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836711416956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von, and Venzke, Ingo. “In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification.” European Journal of International Law 23, no. 1 (2012): 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr106.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael. “Legal and Non-Legal Norms – a Meaningful Distinction in International Relations?” Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 11 (1980): 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0167676800002725.Google Scholar

Boucher, David. The Limits of Ethics in International Relations: Natural Law, Natural Rights, and Human Rights in Transition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Curtis, and Kelley, Judith. “The Concept of International Delegation.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71, no. 1 (2008): 1–36.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva. “Positive Subsidiarity and Its Implications for the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 37, no. 3 (2019): 201-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919861798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brems, Eva, and Gerards, Janneke, eds. Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brems, Eva, and Lavrysen, Laurens. “Procedural Justice in Human Rights Adjudication: The European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 35, no. 1 (2013): 176–200.Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen. “Judicial Activism: Power without Responsibility?” In Judicial Activism: Power without Responsibility?, edited by Kiely, Benjamin, 71–86. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, 2006.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryman, Alan. Social Research Methods, 4th edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Brysk, Alison, and Stohl, Michael. Contesting Human Rights: Norms, Institutions and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas. “Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad?” Leiden Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2001): 267–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156501000139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burai, Erna. “Parody as Norm Contestation: Russian Normative Justifications in Georgia and Ukraine and Their Implications for Global Norms.” Global Society 30, no. 1 (2016): 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1092424.Google Scholar

Búzás, Zoltán I, and Graham, Erin R. “Emergent Flexibility in Institutional Development: How International Rules Really Change.” International Studies Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2020): 821–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa049.Google Scholar

Byron, Christine. “A Blurring of the Boundaries: The Application of International Humanitarian Law by Human Rights Bodies.” Virginia Journal of International Law 47, no. 4 (2007): 839–96.Google Scholar

Cakal, Ergun. “Assessing (and Making Sense of) Severity: Conceptualising and Contextualising Torture’s Core.” Nordic Journal of International Law 91, no. 2 (2022): 284–309. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-91020003.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak. “Autocratic Strategies and the European Court of Human Rights.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 2, no. 1 (2021): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Çalı, Başak. “Coping with Crisis: Whither the Variable Geometry in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 35, no. 2 (2018): 237–76.Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, Costello, Cathryn, and Cunningham, Stewart. “Hard Protection through Soft Courts? Non-Refoulement before the United Nations Treaty Bodies.” German Law Journal 21, no. 3 (April 2020): 355–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.28.Google Scholar

Çalı, Basak, Koch, Anne, and Bruch, Nicola. “The Legitimacy of Human Rights Courts: A Grounded Interpretivist Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 35, no. 4 (2013): 955–84.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni. “When Do Institutions ‘Bite’? Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change.” Comparative Political Studies 49, no. 8 (2016): 1095–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626449.Google Scholar

Capoccia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, R. Daniel. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3 (2007): 341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caron, David D. “Towards a Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 24, no. 2 (2006): 401–22.Google Scholar

Carrubba, Clifford J., and Gabel, Matthew. “International Courts: A Theoretical Assessment.” Annual Review of Political Science 20, no. 1 (2017): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. “The Prohibition on Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.” In Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers of Antoine Cassese, edited by Gaeta, Paola and Zappala, Salvatore, 295–331. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cerna, Christina M. “The Inter-American System for the Protection of Human Rights.” Florida Journal of International Law 16, no. 1 (2004): 195–211.Google Scholar

Chandler, David. “The Ideological (Mis)Use of Human Rights.” In Human Rights: Politics and Practice, edited by Goodhart, Michael, 189–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas, and Madsen, Mikael Rask. “Introduction: The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 1–14. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Cichowski, Rachel A. “Civil Society and the European Court of Human Rights – Oxford Scholarship.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 77–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Clark, Robert P. “Patterns of ETA Violence, 1968–1980.” In Political Violence and Terror: Motifs and Motivations, edited by Merkl, Peter H., 283–311. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Clifford, Bob. “Introduction: Fighting for New Rights.” In The International Struggle for New Human Rights, edited by Clifford, Bob, 1–13. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Cohen, Harlan. “Theorizing Precedent in International Law.” In Interpretation in International Law, edited by Bianchi, Andrea, Behn, Daniel, and Windsor, Matthew, 268–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Cohen, Harlan Grant, Grossman, Nienke, Follesdal, Andreas, and Ulfstein, Geir, eds., Legitimacy and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colter, Lucy, and Yeginsu, Can. “Inquests and the ‘Detachable’ Article 2 Obligation: In Re McCaughey.” Judicial Review 16, no. 3 (2011): 290–96. https://doi.org/10.5235/108546811797434110.Google Scholar

Cooley, Alexander. “Authoritarianism Goes Global: Countering Democratic Norms.” Journal of Democracy 26, no. 3 (2015): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0049.Google Scholar

Coolsaet, Rik. “EU Counterterrorism Strategy: Value Added or Chimera?” International Affairs 86, no. 4 (2010): 857–73.Google Scholar

Cooper, Sarah Lucy. “Marriage, Family, Discrimination & Contradiction: An Evaluation of the Legacy and Future of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence on LGBT Rights.” German Law Journal 12, no. 10 (2011): 1746–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200017545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornell, Svante E. “The Kurdish Question in Turkish Politics.” In Dangerous Neighborhood: Contemporary Issues in Turkey’s Foreign Relations, edited by Radu, Michael, 123–42. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. “Preparatory Work on Article 3 of the European Convention of Human Rights.” DH (56) 5. Strasbourg, May 22, 1956.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. “Vienna Declaration,” October 9, 1993. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680536c83.Google Scholar

Creamer, Cosette D., and Godzimirska, Zuzanna. “Trust in the Court: The Role of the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 30, no. 2 (2019): 665–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz035.Google Scholar

Cross, Frank B., and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. “The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism.” Minnesota Law Review 91, no. 6 (2007): 1752–84.Google Scholar

Danish and Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. “Draft Copenhagen Declaration,” February 5, 2018. https://menneskeret.dk/sites/menneskeret.dk/files/media/dokumenter/nyheder/draft_copenhagen_declaration_05.02.18.pdf.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. “Norms under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4, no. 1 (2019): 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms.” International Studies Review 22, no. 1 (2020): 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy080.Google Scholar

Diehl, Paul F., and Ku, Charlotte. The Dynamics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Dignan, James. Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. New York: Open University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Donahue, Deirdre. “Human Rights in Northern Ireland: Ireland v. the United Kingdom.” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 3, no. 2 (1980): 377–432.Google Scholar

Donald, Alice, and Leach, Philip. “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Why the Draft Copenhagen Declaration Must Be Rewritten.” EJIL: Talk! (blog), February 21, 2018. www.ejiltalk.org/a-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-why-the-draft-copenhagen-declaration-must-be-rewritten/.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. “Normative versus Taxonomic Humanity: Varieties of Human Dignity in the Western Tradition.” Journal of Human Rights 14, no. 1 (2015): 1–22.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dothan, Shai. “Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights.” Chicago Journal of International Law 12, no. 1 (2011). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol12/iss1/6.Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai. Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim, and Hanson, Marianne. “Human Rights in International Relations.” In Human Rights: Politics and Practice, 3rd edition, edited by Goodhart, Michael, 61–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A.. “International Judicial Practices: Opening the Black Box of International Courts.” Michigan Journal of International Law 40, no. 1 (2018): 47–114.Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A.. “The Judicial Trilemma.” American Journal of International Law 111, no. 2 (2017): 225–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.23.Google Scholar

Duranti, Marco. The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. Can the European Court of Human Rights Shape European Public Order? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. “European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” German Law Journal 12, no. 10 (2011): 1731–45.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin. European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, and Greene, Alan. “Legitimacy and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Perspectives from Academia and Practitioners.” German Law Journal. 12, no. 10 (2011): 1707–15.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, Kanstantsin, and O’Mahony, Conor. “Evolutive Interpretation of Rights Provisions: A Comparison of the European Court of Human Rights and the U.S. Supreme Court.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 44, no. 2 (2013): 309–66.Google Scholar

Ebobrah, Solomon T. “International Human Rights Courts.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, edited by Romano, Cesare, Shany, Yuval, and Alter, Karen J., 225–49. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Elsig, Manfred, and Pollack, Mark A.. “Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (2014): 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112448201.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights. “Annual Report 2011.” Strasbourg: Registry of the European Court, 2012.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights. “ECHR Registry.” Accessed September 10, 2019. www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=court/howitworks&c=.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights. “Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria,” January 1, 2014. Available at www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Admissibility_guide_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights. “Reform of the Court: Filtering of Cases Successful in Reducing Backlog.” Press Release, ECHR 312 (2013), October 24, 2013.Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights. Rules of the Court (2014). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Rules_Court_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

Fariss, Christopher J. “The Changing Standard of Accountability and the Positive Relationship between Human Rights Treaty Ratification and Compliance.” British Journal of Political Science 48, no. 1 (2018): 239–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341500054X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fariss, Christopher J. “Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability.” American Political Science Review 108, no. 2 (2014): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fariss, Christopher J., and Dancy, Geoff. “Measuring the Impact of Human Rights: Conceptual and Methodological Debates.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13, no. 1 (2017): 273–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113333.Google Scholar

Fenwick, Helen. “Enhanced Subsidiarity and a Dialogic Approach – Or Appeasement in Recen Cases on Criminal Justice, Public Order and Counter-Terrorism at Strasbourg against the UK?” In The UK and European Human Rights: A Strained Relationship?, edited by Ziegler, Katja S., Wicks, Elizabeth, and Hodson, Loveday, 193–214. Oxford and Portland: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar

Ferrer Mac-, Gregor, Eduardo. “The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right under the Inter-American Human Rights System.” Mexican Law Review 9, no. 1 (2016): 121–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.007.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998): 887–917.Google Scholar

Fioretos, Orfeo. “Historical Institutionalism in International Relations.” International Organization 65, no. 2 (2011): 367–99.Google Scholar

Fleischer, Julia, and Reiners, Nina. “Connecting International Relations and Public Administration: Toward a Joint Research Agenda for the Study of International Bureaucracy.” International Studies Review 23, no. 4 (2021): 1230–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa097.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, Andreas. “Subsidiarity and International Human-Rights Courts: Respecting Self-Governance and Protecting Human Rights – Or Neither?” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 2 (2016): 147–63.Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas. “Survey Article: The Legitimacy of International Courts.” Journal of Political Philosophy 28, no. 4 (2020): 476–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12213.Google Scholar

Follesdal, Andreas, Schaffer, Johan Karlsson, and Ulfstein, Geir. “International Human Rights and the Challenge of Legitimacy.” In The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Føllesdal, Andreas, Schaffer, Johan Karlsson, and Ulfstein, Geir, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Forowicz, Magdalena. The Reception of International Law in the European Court of Human Rights. International Courts and Tribunals Series. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Forsythe, David P. Human Rights in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fredman FBA, Sandra. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272761.001.0001.Google Scholar

Freitas, Tiago Fidalgo de. “Theories of Judicial Behavior and the Law: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead.” In Judicial Activism: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences, edited by Coutinho, Luís Pereira, La Torre, Massimo, and Smith, Steven D., 105–17. Cham and New York: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

García-Montoya, Laura, and Mahoney, James. “Critical Event Analysis in Case Study Research.” Sociological Methods & Research, July 8, 2020, 0049124120926201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120926201.Google Scholar

Garoupa, Nuno, and Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerards, Janneke. “Inadmissibility Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Critique of the Lack of Reasoning.” Human Rights Law Review 14, no. 1 (2014): 148–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngt044.Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke. “Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 18, no. 3 (2018): 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy017.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. “Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking.” Virginia Journal of International Law 45, no. 3 (2005): 631–73.Google Scholar

Gismondi, Giovanna. “Denial of Justice: The Latest Indigenous Land Disputes before the European Court of Human Rights and the Need for an Expansive Interpretation of Protocol 1.” Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 18 (2016): 1–55.Google Scholar

Glas, Lize R. “From Interlaken to Copenhagen: What Has Become of the Proposals Aiming to Reform the Functioning of the European Court of Human Rights?” Human Rights Law Review 20, no. 1 (2020): 121–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa001.Google Scholar

Goldhaber, Michael. A People’s History of the European Court of Human Rights: A People’s History of the European Court of Human Rights. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Goldston, James A. “Public Interest Litigation in Central and Eastern Europe: Roots, Prospects, and Challenges.” Human Rights Quarterly 28, no. 2 (2006): 492–527.Google Scholar

Goldston, James A. “The Struggle for Roma Rights: Arguments That Have Worked.” Human Rights Quarterly 32, no. 2 (2010): 311–25.Google Scholar

Gordon, Rebecca. Mainstreaming Torture: Ethical Approaches in the Post-9/11 United States. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gourgourinis, Anastasios. “The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2, no. 1 (2011): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq022.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Karen J., ed. The Torture Debate in America. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Karen J., and Dratel, Joshua L., eds. The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib, 1st edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greer, Steven. “Is the Prohibition against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Really ‘Absolute’ in International Human Rights Law?” Human Rights Law Review 15, no. 1 (2015): 101–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngu035.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven. “The Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Universal Principle or Margin of Appreciation?” UCL Human Rights Review 3 (2010): 1–14.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven. “Should Police Threats to Torture Suspects Always Be Severely Punished? Reflections on the Gäfgen Case.” Human Rights Law Review 11, no. 1 (2011): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngr001.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven C. The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000.Google Scholar

Greer, Steven, and Wildhaber, Luzius. “Revisiting the Debate about ‘Constitutionalising’ the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 12, no. 4 (2012): 655–87.Google Scholar

Gregg, Benjamin. Human Rights as Social Construction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Guelke, Adrian. “Loyalist and Republican Perceptions of the Northern Ireland Conflict: The UDA and Provisional IRA.” In Political Violence and Terror: Motifs and Motivations, edited by Merkl, Peter H., 91–122. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Haddad, Heidi Nichols. The Hidden Hands of Justice: NGOs, Human Rights, and International Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557313.Google Scholar

Haddad, Heidi Nichols. “Judicial Institution Builders: NGOs and International Human Rights Courts.” Journal of Human Rights 11, no. 1 (2012): 126–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2012.648154.Google Scholar

Hadfield, Gillian K. “Judicial Competence and the Interpretation of Incomplete Contracts.” Journal of Legal Studies 23, no. 1 (1994): 159–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/467919.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon C. W.. “Human Rights Institutions, Sovereignty Costs and Democratization.” British Journal of Political Science 45, no. 1 (2015): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000240.Google Scholar

Hafner‐Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110, no. 5 (2005): 1373–1411. https://doi.org/10.1086/428442.Google Scholar

Haglund, Jillienne. Regional Courts, Domestic Politics, and the Struggle for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108776561.Google Scholar

Hajjar Lisa, Torture: A Sociology of Violence and Human Rights. New York; London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Harmsen, Robert. “The European Convention on Human Rights after Enlargement.” The International Journal of Human Rights 5, no. 4 (2010): 18–43.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Jacques. “A Danish Crusade for the Reform of the European Court of Human Rights.” EJIL: Talk! (blog), November 14, 2017. www.ejiltalk.org/a-danish-crusade-for-the-reform-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights/.Google Scholar

Haslam, S. Alexander, and Reicher, Stephen. “Beyond the Banality of Evil: Three Dynamics of an Interactionist Social Psychology of Tyranny.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33, no. 5 (2007): 615–22.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren, and Jacoby, Wade. “Agent Permeability, Principal Delegation and the European Court of Human Rights.” The Review of International Organizations 3, no. 1 (2008): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9014-1.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. “The Burdens and Benefits of Brighton.” ESIL Reflections 1, no. 1 (2012): 1–6.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Alter, Karen J.. “Legitimacy and Lawmaking: A Tale of Three International Courts.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14, no. 2 (2013): 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2013-024.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R. “Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime.” European Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2008): 125–59.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Ryan, Clare. “LGBT Rights as Mega-Politics: Litigating before the ECtHR,” Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2021-32, January 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3867604.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. “Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo.” California Law Review 93, no. 3 (2005): 899–956.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Erik. “International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe.” International Organization 68, no. 1 (2014): 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818313000398.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R, and Voeten, Erik. “Walking Back Dissents on the European Court of Human Rights: A Rejoinder to Alec Stone Sweet, Wayne Sandholtz and Mads Andenas.” European Journal of International Law 32, no. 3 (2021): 907–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab058.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R, and Voeten, Erik. “Walking Back Human Rights in Europe?” European Journal of International Law 31, no. 3 (2020): 797–827. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heri, Corina. Responsive Human Rights: Vulnerability, Ill-Treatment and the ECtHR. Gordonsville: Hart Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar

Heri, Corina. “The ECtHR’s Pending Climate Change Case: What’s Ill-Treatment Got to Do with It?” EJIL: Talk! (blog), December 22, 2020. www.ejiltalk.org/the-ecthrs-pending-climate-change-case-whats-ill-treatment-got-to-do-with-it/.Google Scholar

High-Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Brighton Declaration (19–20 April). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Brussels_Declaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

High-Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Brussels Declaration (2015). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Brussels_Declaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

High-Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Copenhagen Declaration (2018). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Copenhagen_Declaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

High-Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Interlaken Declaration (2010). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2010_Interlaken_FinalDeclaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

High-Level Conference on the Future of the European Court of Human Rights. Izmir Declaration (2011). www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2011_Izmir_FinalDeclaration_ENG.pdf.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, Courtney. Saving the International Justice Regime: Beyond Backlash against International Courts. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Hodson, Loveday. “Activating the Law: Exploring the Legal Responses of NGOs to Gross Rights Violations.” In Making Human Rights Intelligible: Towards a Sociology of Human Rights, edited by Madsen, Mikael Rask and Verschraegen, Gert, 267–82. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar

Hodson, Loveday. NGOs and the Struggle for Human Rights in Europe. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Stephanie C., and Yeo, Andrew I.. “Business as Usual: The Role of Norms in Alliance Management.” European Journal of International Relations 21, no. 2 (2015): 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114533978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, Alisha. Forbearance as Redistribution: The Politics of Informal Welfare in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Holland, Alisha C. “Forbearance.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 2 (2016): 232–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000083.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra. “Constitutional Lawyers and the Inter-American Court’s Varied Authority.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016): 179–207.Google Scholar

Huneeus, Alexandra, Couso, Javier, and Sieder, Rachel. “Introduction.” In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, edited by Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Jackson, Miles. “Judicial Avoidance at the European Court of Human Rights: Institutional Authority, the Procedural Turn, and Docket Control.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 3 (2022): 112–140.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Alan M. “Social Policy Dynamics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by Fioretos, Orfeo, Falleti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam, 340–54. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Johns, Leslie. Strengthening International Courts: The Hidden Costs of Legalization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Johnson, Douglas A., Mora, Alberto, and Schmidt, Averell. “The Strategic Costs of Torture.” Foreign Affairs, January 26, 2017. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/strategic-costs-torture.Google Scholar

Johnson, Paul James, and Falcetta, Silvia. “Sexual Orientation Discrimination and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Developing the Protection of Sexual Minorities.” European Law Review, April 2018, 167–85.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Ian. The Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics and Organizations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Joint Committee on Human Rights (House of Lords, House of Commons). “Counter-Terrorism Policy and Human Rights (Seventeenth Report): Bringing Human Rights Back In – Human Rights Joint Committee.” London, March 25, 2010. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200910/jtselect/jtrights/86/8607.htm.Google Scholar

Jurkovich, Michelle. “What Isn’t a Norm? Redefining the Conceptual Boundaries of ‘Norms’ in the Human Rights Literature.” International Studies Review 22, no. 3 (2020): 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz040.Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul W. Sacred Violence: Torture, Terror, and Sovereignty. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kälin, Walter. “The Struggle against Torture.” International Review of the Red Cross 12, no. 324 (1998): 433–44.Google Scholar

Kamminga, M. T. “The Thematic Procedures of the UN Commission on Human Rights.” Netherlands International Law Review 34, no. 3 (1987): 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X00010342.Google Scholar

Kapardis, Andreas. Psychology and Law: A Critical Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. “Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on Politically Crucial Cases.” Law and Society Review 45, no. 2 (2011): 471–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00437.x.Google Scholar

Kapotas, Panos, and Tzevelekos, Vassilis P.. Building Consensus on European Consensus: Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Kassimeris, Christos, and Tsoumpanou, Lina. “The Impact of the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on Turkey’s EU Candidacy.” The International Journal of Human Rights 12, no. 3 (2008): 329–45.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen, and Heri, Corina. “Deliberation and Drafting: European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (EiPro). Oxford Public International Law, May 2018. https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3210.013.3210/law-mpeipro-e3210.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen, and Heri, Corina. “The Future Is Now: Climate Cases before the ECtHR.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 40, no. 10 (2022): 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/18918131.2022.2064074.Google Scholar

Keller, Helen, and Sweet, Alec Stone. “Introduction: The Reception of the ECHR in National Legal Order.” In A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems, edited by Helen Keller and Alec Stone Sweet, 3–26. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kelly, Tobias. This Side of Silence: Human Rights, Torture, and the Recognition of Cruelty. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, John H., and Pejan, Ramin, eds. The Human Right to a Healthy Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Koch, Ida Elisabeth. Human Rights As Indivisible Rights: The Protection of Socio-Economic Demands under the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar

Krahenmann, Sandra. “Positive Obligations in Human Rights Treaties.” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, 2012.Google Scholar

Krippendorff, Klaus. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2018.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico. “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods.” American Journal of International Law 108, no. 1 (2014): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.1.0001.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico. “Liquid Authority in Global Governance.” International Theory 9, no. 2 (July 2017): 237–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000269.Google Scholar

Krisch, Nico, and Yildiz, Ezgi. “The Many Paths of Change in International Law: A Frame” in The Many Paths of Change in International Law, edited by Nico Krisch and Ezgi Yildiz, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Krook, Mona Lena, and True, Jacqui. “Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality.” European Journal of International Relations 18, no. 1 (2012): 103–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110380963.Google Scholar

Kurban, Dilek. Limits of Supranational Justice: The European Court of Human Rights and Turkey’s Kurdish Conflict. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Kurban, Dilek. “Protecting Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in the ECtHR: Litigation and Jurisprudence in Turkey.” In The European Court of Human Rights and the Rights of Marginalised Individuals and Minorities in National Context, edited by Anagnostou, Dia and Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia, 159–82. Boston and Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010.Google Scholar

LaFleur, Vinca. “A View from America: Tactical Unity, Strategic Divide.” In Europe Confronts Terrorism, edited by Von Hippel, Karin, 191–207. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Langford, Malcolm, and Behn, Daniel. “Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treaty Arbitrator?” European Journal of International Law 29, no. 2 (2018): 551–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy030.Google Scholar

Lantis, Jeffrey S. “Theories of International Norm Contestation: Structure and Outcomes.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, June 28, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.590.Google Scholar

Larkins, Christopher M. “Judicial Independence and Democratization: A Theoretical and Conceptual Analysis.” American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4 (1996): 605–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/840623.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’Etat. Cambridge and UK: Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lauren, Paul Gordon. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen, 3rd edition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Lauritzen, Paul. The Ethics of Interrogation: Professional Responsibility in an Age of Terror. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., Barrington, J. Harcourt, Bentwich, Norman, Moore, W. Harvey, Spens, Patrick, and Mr. Barrington, . “The Proposed European Court of Human Rights.” Transactions of the Grotius Society 35 (1949): 25–47.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. An International Bill of the Rights of Man. New York: Columbia University Press, 1945.Google Scholar

Lavrysen, Laurens. Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights, 1st edition. Cambridge and Antwerp and Portland: Intersentia, 2016.Google Scholar

Lavrysen, Laurens, and Mavronicola, Natasa. Coercive Human Rights: Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar

Leach, Philip. Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 3rd edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Letsas, George. “The ECHR as a Living Instrument: Its Meaning and Legitimacy.” In Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context, edited by Føllesdal, Andreas, Peters, Birgit, and Ulfstein, Geir, 106–41. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Letsas, George. “Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer.” European Journal of International Law 21, no. 3 (2010): 509–41.Google Scholar

Letsas, George. A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown, 2018.Google Scholar

Liese, Andrea. “Exceptional Necessity – How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment When Countering Terrorism.” Journal of International Law and International Relations 5, no. 1 (2009): 17–48.Google Scholar

Lindquist, Stefanie A, and Cross, Frank B.. Measuring Judicial Activism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lixinski, Lucas. “The Consensus Method of Interpretation by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” Canadian Journal of Comparative and Contemporary Law 3, no. 1 (2017): 65–95.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016).Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics.” Law and Social Inquiry 32, no. 1 (2007): 137–59.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “International Human Rights and the Transformation of European Society: From ‘Free Europe’ to the Europe of Human Rights.” In Law and the Formation of Modern Europe: Perspectives from the Historical Sociology of Law, edited by Madsen, Mikael Rask and Thornhill, Chris, 245–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “The Legitimization Strategies of International Judges: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights.” In Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts, edited by Bobek, Michal, 259–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “The Narrowing of the European Court of Human Rights? Legal Diplomacy, Situational Self-Restraint, and the New Vision for the Court.” European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 2, no. 2 (2021): 180–208. https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10023.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “Protracted Institutionalization of the Strasbourg Court: From Legal Diplomacy to Integrationist Jurisprudence.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 43–61. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018): 199–222.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask. “Two-Level Politics and the Backlash against International Courts: Evidence from the Politicisation of the European Court of Human Rights.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22, no. 4 (2020): 728–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120948180.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, Cebulak, Pola, and Wiebusch, Micha. “Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistance to International Courts.” International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–37. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Mandaville, Peter. “Muslim Transnational Identity and State Responses in Europe and the UK after 9/11: Political Community, Ideology and Authority.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35, no. 3 (2009): 491–506.Google Scholar

Marchuk, Iryna, and Aksenova, Marina. “The Tale of Yukos and of the Russian Constitutional Court’s Rebellion against the European Court of Human Right.” Osservatorio Costituzionale, Associazione Italiana Dei Costituzionalisti (AIC), 2017. www.osservatorioaic.it/the-tale-of-yukos-and-of-the-russian-constitutional-court-s-rebellion-against-the-european-court-of-human-rights.html.Google Scholar

Marks, Susan. “Yes, Virginia, Extradition May Breach the European Convention of Human Rights.” The Cambridge Law Journal 49, no. 2 (1990): 194–97.Google Scholar

Matta, Aaron, and Mazmanyan, Armen. “Russia: In Quest for a European Identity.” In Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights: Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level, edited by Popelier, Patricia, Lambrecht, Sarah, and Lemmens, Koen, 481–502. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.Google Scholar

Mavronicola, Natasa. “Is the Prohibition against Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Absolute in International Human Rights Law? A Reply to Steven Greer.” Human Rights Law Review 17, no. 3 (2017): 479–98.Google Scholar

Mavronicola, Natasa. Torture, Inhumanity and Degradation under Article 3 of the ECHR: Absolute Rights and Absolute Wrongs. Oxford and New York: Hart Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar

Mayer, Jane. “Outsourcing Torture: The Secret History of America’s ‘Extraordinary Rendition’ Program.” In The United States and Torture: Interrogation, Incarceration, and Abuse, edited by Marjorie Cohn, 137–160. New York and London: New York University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

McCoy, Alfred W. Torture and Impunity: The U.S. Doctrine of Coercive Interrogation. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Méndez, Juan E., and Wentworth, Marjory. Taking a Stand: The Evolution of Human Rights. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar

Merrills, John. “International Adjudication and Autonomy.” In International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order edited by Collins, Richard and White, Nigel D., 160–177. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Mirabella, Daniel. “The Death and Resurrection of Natural Law.” The Western Australian Jurist 2, no. 1 (2011): 251–60.Google Scholar

Moeckli, Daniel. Human Rights and Non-Discrimination in the “War on Terror.” Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Monar, Jörg. “Common Threat and Common Response? The European Union’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy and Its Problems.” Government and Opposition 42, no. 3 (2007): 292–313.Google Scholar

Moral, Ignacio de la Rasilla del. “The Increasingly Marginal Appreciation of the Margin-of-Appreciation Doctrine.” German Law Journal 7, no. 6 (2006): 611–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200004892.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54, no. 2 (2000): 217–52.Google Scholar

Moses, Lyria Bennett. “Understanding Legal Responses to Technological Change of in Vitro Fertilization.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology 6, no. 2 (2005): 505–618.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair. The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Alastair. “Subsidiarity and the European Convention on Human Rights.” Human Rights Law Review 15, no. 2 (2015): 313–41.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel. The Last Utopia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Müller, Harald, and Wunderlich, Carmen. Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice. Athens, and London: University of Georgia Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Neal, Andrew W. “Securitization and Risk at the EU Border: The Origins of FRONTEX.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47, no. 2 (2009): 333–56.Google Scholar

Neier, Aryeh. The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Nowak, Manfred, and McArthur, Elizabeth. “The Distinction between Torture and Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment.” Torture 16, no. 3 (2006): 147–51.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, Michael. “The Imperiled Success of the European Court of Human Rights.” In Trente Ans de Droit Européen Des Droits de l’Homme. Études à La Mémoire de Wolfgang Strasser, edited by Hartig, Hanno, 251–64. Brussels: Nemesis/Bruylant, 2007.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, Michael. “Torture and Emergency Powers under the European Convention on Human Rights: Ireland v. the United Kingdom.” American Journal of International Law 71, no. 4 (1977): 674–706.Google Scholar

Oette, Lutz. “The Prohibition of Torture and Persons Living in Poverty: From the Margins to the Centre.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 70, no. 2 (2021): 307–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589321000038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Mara, Shane. Why Torture Doesn’t Work: The Neuroscience of Interrogation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas. International Legal Theory: Essays and Engagements, 1966–2006, 1st edition. New York: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander. “Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 14, no. 3 (2003): 529–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.3.529.Google Scholar

Pallitto, Robert M. Torture and State Violence in the United States: A Short Documentary History, 1st edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Parliamentary Assembly. Procedure for Electing Judges to the European Court of Human Rights, AS/Cdh/Inf (2015) 02 Rev 1 § (2015).Google Scholar

Parry, John T. Understanding Torture: Law, Violence, and Political Identity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa Theologiae. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Paulo, Norbert. The Confluence of Philosophy and Law in Applied Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. “Is It International Law or Not, and Does It Even Matter?” In Is It International Law or Not, and Does It Even Matter?, edited by Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., and Wouters, Jan, 125–61. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, and Elsig, Manfred. “The Politics of Treaty Interpretation: Variations and Explanations across International Tribunals.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Pollack, Mark A., 445–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A., and Wouters, Jan. “When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking.” European Journal of International Law 25, no. 3 (2014): 733–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chu051.Google Scholar

Pavone, Tommaso. The Ghostwriters: Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction of Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Phillips, Barry. “The Case for Corporal Punishment in the United Kingdom. Beaten into Submission in Europe?” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43, no. 1 (1994): 153–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/43.1.153.Google Scholar

Poe, Steven C. “The Decision to Repress: An Integrative Theoretical Approach to the Research on Human Rights and Repression.” In Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies, Carey, Sabine C. and Poe, Steven C., 16–38. Burlington: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark. “Learning from the Americanists (Again): Theory and Method in the Study of Delegation.” West European Politics 25, no. 1 (2002): 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/713869589.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. “Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community.” International Organization 51, no. 1 (1997): 99–134.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Pollack, Mark A. “International Court Curbing in Geneva: Lessons from the Paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body.” Governance. 20 March 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12686.Google Scholar

Raffaele, Sabato. “Judicial Dialogue: The Experience of Italy.” In Judicial Dialogue and Human Rights, edited by Müller, Amrei and Kjos, Hege Elisabeth, 267–84. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Ramanzini, Isabela Garbin, and Yildiz, Ezgi. “Revamping to Remain Relevant: How Do the European and the Inter-American Human Rights Systems Adapt to Challenges?” Journal of Human Rights Practice 12, no. 3 (2020): 768–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa038.Google Scholar

Reidy, Aisling. “The Prohibition of Torture: A Guide to the Implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Human Rights Handbooks, No.6. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2003.Google Scholar

Reidy, Aisling, et al. “Gross Violations of Human Rights: Invoking the European Convention on Human Rights in the Case of Turkey.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 15, no. 1 (1997): 161–75.Google Scholar

Reiners, Nina. Transnational Lawmaking Coalitions for Human Rights. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Rejali, Darius. Torture and Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Robinson, Oliver C. “Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 11, no. 1 (2014): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543.Google Scholar

Rodley, Nigel, and Pollard, Matt. The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Ronen, Yael, and Naggan, Yale. “Third Parties.” In The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, edited by Romano, Cesare P. R., Alter, Karen J., and Shany, Yuval, 806-27. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sahin, Selver B. “Combatting Violence against Women in Turkey: Structural Obstacles.” Contemporary Politics 28, no. 2 (2022): 204–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1992131.Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne. “Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 1 (2008): 101–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087766.Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne. “International Norm Change.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, June 28, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.588.Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne, and Stiles, Kendall W.. International Norms and Cycles of Change. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Scharf, Michael P. “Seizing the ‘Grotian Moment’: Accelerated Formation of Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change.” Cornell International Law Journal 43, no. 3 (2010): 439–69.Google Scholar

Schiemann, John W. Does Torture Work? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Schlüter, Karen. “The Council of Europe, the Standard Setter.” In Human Rights in Europe: A Fragmented Regime? edited by Brosig, Malte, 30–56. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang AG, 2006.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Averell, and Sikkink, Kathryn. “Breaking the Ban? The Heterogeneous Impact of US Contestation of the Torture Norm.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4, no. 1 (2019): 105–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogy036.Google Scholar

Scribner, Druscilla, and Slagter, Tracy. “Recursive Norm Development: The Role of Supranational Courts.” Global Policy 8, no. 3 (2017): 322–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12453.Google Scholar

Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61, no. 2 (2008): 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.Google Scholar

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Search, and Dianne Feinstein. The Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Torture: Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. Brooklyn: Melville House, 2014.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Martin, and Sweet, Alec Stone. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, 1st edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Shue, Henry. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn. Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Smet, Stijn. “Conflicts between Absolute Rights: A Reply to Steven Greer.” Human Rights Law Review 13, no. 3 (2013): 469–98.Google Scholar

Snyder, Sarah B. Human Rights Activism and the End of the Cold War: A Transnational History of the Helsinki Network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Soave, Tommaso. The Everyday Makers of International Law: From Great Halls to Back Rooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Soley, Ximena, and Steininger, Silvia. “Parting Ways or Lashing Back? Withdrawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 237–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000058.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert. “The Future of the European Court of Human Rights – Subsidiarity, Process-Based Review and the Rule of Law.” Human Rights Law Review 18, no. 3 (2018): 473–94.Google Scholar

Spano, Robert. “Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity.” Human Rights Law Review 14, no. 3 (2014): 487–502.Google Scholar

Spier, Jaap. “‘There Is No Future without Addressing Climate Change.’” Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 37, no. 2 (2019): 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1565197.Google Scholar

Sprinzak, Ehud. “Right‐wing Terrorism in a Comparative Perspective: The Case of Split Delegitimization.” Terrorism and Political Violence 7, no. 1 (1995): 17–43.Google Scholar

Staunton, Eglantine, and Ralph, Jason. “The Responsibility to Protect Norm Cluster and the Challenge of Atrocity Prevention: An Analysis of the European Union’s Strategy in Myanmar.” European Journal of International Relations 26, no. 3 (,2020): 660–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119883001.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H. “The Decline of Global Trade Negotiations – and the Rise of Judicial and Regional Alternatives.” Journal of Scholarly Perspectives 5, no. 01 (2009). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3q08n2vf.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H. “Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints.” American Journal of International Law 98, no. 2 (2004): 247–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3176728.Google Scholar

Steininger, Silvia. “Creating Loyalty: Communication Practices in the European and Inter-American Human Rights Regimes.” Global Constitutionalism 11, no. 2 (2022): 161-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000241.Google Scholar

Stiansen, Øyvind. “Directing Compliance? Remedial Approach and Compliance with European Court of Human Rights Judgments.” British Journal of Political Science 51, no. 2 (2021): 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000292.Google Scholar

Stiansen, Øyvind, and Voeten, Erik. “Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” International Studies Quarterly 64, no. 4 (2020): 770–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047.Google Scholar

Stimmer, Anette. “Beyond Internalization: Alternate Endings of the Norm Life Cycle.” International Studies Quarterly 63, no. 2 (2019): 270–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz001.Google Scholar

Stone, Geoffrey R. “Selective Judicial Activism.” Texas Law Review 89, no. 6 (2011): 1423–32.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec. “The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance.” Living Reviews in European Governance 5, no. 2 (2010): 1–50.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas L.. “Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Union, and the World Trade Organization.” Journal of Law and Courts 1, no. 1 (2013): 61–88.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Andenas, Mads. “Dissenting Opinions and Rights Protection in the European Court: A Reply to Laurence Helfer and Erik Voeten.” European Journal of International Law 32, no. 3 (2021): 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab057.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec, Sandholtz, Wayne, and Andenas, Mads. “The Failure to Destroy the Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: 2010–2018,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 21, no. 2 (2022): 244–77.Google Scholar

Stoyanova, Vladislava. “Fault, Knowledge and Risk within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.” Leiden Journal of International Law 33, no. 3 (2020): 601–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000163.Google Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, eds. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen, “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Stroup, Sarah S., and Wong, Wendy H.. The Authority Trap: Strategic Choices of International NGOs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas. “The Anatomy of Autonomy: An Institutional Account of Variation in Supranational Influence.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38, no. 5 (2000): 843–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00267.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas. “Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?” West European Politics 25, no. 1 (2002): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601584.Google Scholar

Tapp, June Louin. “Psychology and the Law: An Overture.” Annual Review of Psychology 27, no. 1 (1976): 359–404.Google Scholar

Thatcher, Mark, and Sweet, Alec Stone. “Theory and Practice of Delegation to Non-Majoritarian Institutions.” West European Politics 25, no. 1 (2002): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601583.Google Scholar

Theilen, Jens T. European Consensus between Strategy and Principle. Baden-Baden: Nomos Publishers, 2021.Google Scholar

Thomas, Daniel C. The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Torres, Felix E. “Reparations: To What End? Developing the State’s Positive Duties to Address Socio-Economic Harms in Post-Conflict Settings through the European Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 32, no. 3 (2021): 807–34.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, Resolution 60/147 Resolution 60/147 § (2005). www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RemedyAndReparation.aspx.Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, United Nations, Treaty Series, 1465, p. 85, § (1987).Google Scholar

UN Human Rights Committee (HRC). General comment no. 31 [80], The nature of the general legal obligation imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 § (2004).Google Scholar

UN Voluntary Fund for Victims of Torture. “Interpretation of Torture in the Light of the Practice and Jurisprudence of International Bodies,” 2011. www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Torture/UNVFVT/Interpretation_torture_2011_EN.pdf.Google Scholar

Van den Eynde, Laura. “An Empirical Look at the Amicus Curiae Practice of Human Rights NGOs before the European Court of Human Rights.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 31, no. 3 (2013): 271–313.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. “Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions’ Authority in Making Law.” Transnational Legal Theory 4, no. 3 (2013): 354–73. https://doi.org/10.5235/20414005.4.3.354.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. “Understanding the Authority of International Courts and Tribunals: On Delegation and Discursive Construction.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14, no. 2 (2013): 381–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2013-020.Google Scholar

Vet, Freek van der. “Seeking Life, Finding Justice: Russian NGO Litigation and Chechen Disappearances before the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights Review 13, no. 3 (2012): 303–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-012-0226-2.Google Scholar

Vila, Marisa Iglesias. “Subsidiarity, Margin of Appreciation and International Adjudication within a Cooperative Conception of Human Rights.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no. 2 (2017): 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox035.Google Scholar

Vincent, Andrew. The Politics of Human Rights. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik. “The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” American Political Science Review 102, no. 4 (2008): 417–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080398.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik. “Making Sense of the Design of International Institutions.” Annual Review of Political Science 22, no. 1 (2019): 147–63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041916-021108.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik. “The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights.” International Organization 61, no. 4 (2007): 669–701. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070233.Google Scholar

Voeten, Erik. “Populism and Backlashes against International Courts.” Perspectives on Politics 18, no. 2 (2020): 407–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719000975.Google Scholar

Von Hippel, Karin. “Introduction: Europe Confronts Terrorism.” In Europe Confronts Terrorism, edited by Karin Von Hippel, 1–14. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Walklate, Sandra. Imagining The Victim Of Crime. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Wallace, Angus EM. “The European Court of Human Rights: A Tool for Improving Prison Health.” The Lancet Public Health 5, no. 2 (2020): e78–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30258-0.Google Scholar

Wallace, J. Clifford. “Jurisprudence of Judicial Restraint: A Return to the Moorings.” George Washington Law Review 50, no. 1 (1981): 1–16.Google Scholar

Warbrick, Colin. “The European Response to Terrorism in an Age of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 15, no. 5 (2004): 989–1018.Google Scholar

Webster, Elaine. Dignity, Degrading Treatment and Torture in Human Rights Law: The Ends of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

Weissbrodt, David. “The Role of the Human Rights Committee in Interpreting and Developing Humanitarian Law.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 31, no. 4 (2010): 1185–1238.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje. Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, Luzius. “‘Rethinking the European Court of Human Rights’.” In The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics, edited by Christoffersen, Jonas and Madsen, Mikael Rask, 204–30. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Williams, Andrew. EU Human Rights Policies: A Study in Irony. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Winston, Carla. “Norm Structure, Diffusion, and Evolution: A Conceptual Approach.” European Journal of International Relations 24, no. 3 (2018): 638–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117720794.Google Scholar

Xenos, Dimitris. The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights. London and New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi. “A Court with Many Faces: Judicial Characters and Modes of Norm Development in the European Court of Human Rights.” European Journal of International Law 31, no. 1 (2020): 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chaa014.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi. “Enduring Practices in Changing Circumstances: A Comparison of the European Court of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.” Temple International & Comparative Law Journal 34, no. 2 (2020): 309–38.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi. “Extraterritoriality Reconsidered: Functional Boundaries as Repositories of Jurisdiction.” In The Extraterritoriality of Law: History, Theory, Politics, edited by Margolies, Daniel S., Özsu, Umut, Pal, Maïa, and Tzouvala, Ntina, 215–27. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi. “Judicial Creativity in the Making: The Pilot Judgment Procedure a Decade after Its Inception.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Rights Law 8, no. 1 (2015): 81–102.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi, “Interpretative Evolution of the Norm Prohibiting Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment under the European Convention” in Language and Legal Interpretation in International Law, edited by Anne Lise Kjær and Joanna Lam, 295-314. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi, and Yüksel, Umut. “Understanding the Limitations of Behavioralism: Lessons from the Field of Maritime Delimitation.” German Law Journal 23, no. 3 (2022): 413–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.24.Google Scholar

Yildiz, Ezgi, Yüksel, Umut, Punyakumpol, Chanya, and Carrillo, Carlos. “New Norms in Old Regimes: Judicial Strategies for Importing Environmental Norms.” Unpublished Manuscript, 2022.Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, Fuad. “Judicial Activism.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law (EiPro). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e2864.013.2864/law-mpeipro-e2864?rskey=BMfOnJ&result=1&prd=MPILGoogle Scholar

Zarbiyev, Fuad. “Judicial Activism in International Law – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3, no. 2 (2012): 247–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/ids005.Google Scholar

Zarbiyev, Fuad. “Saying Credibly What the Law Is: On Marks of Authority in International Law.” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9, no. 2 (2018): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idy004.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Doron. “The European Union and Post-9/11 Counterterrorism: A Reappraisal.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29, no. 2 (2006): 123–45.Google Scholar

Zwingel, Susanne. “How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 1 (2012): 115–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00701.x.Google Scholar