Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:21:57.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guest Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Leónie Bentsink*
Affiliation:
Wageningen Seed Laboratory, Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Guest Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

I am pleased to present this thematic issue of Seed Science Research on seed dormancy. This peer-reviewed special issue was designed to present to the Seed Science Research readership original research articles, reviews and opinion papers related to seed dormancy. It offers a broad overview of topics that involve the various types of seed dormancy, including physical dormancy, morphophysiological dormancy and physiological dormancy, as well as both primary and secondary dormancy, and the relation between these two dormancy types. There is a focus on the role of the environment on the levels of dormancy, which is very timely in this era when a large part of the research is related to the changing climate. Auge et al. make clear, for example, that the interaction of seed maturation temperature, afterripening and post-dispersal conditions, together, determine the time of the year of seed germination. In this respect the genotype also plays an important role, due to within-species adaptation to the local environment (Huang et al.). Moreover, temperature affects both dormancy and germination, and to distinguish between these two effects Battla and Benech-Arnold constructed a conceptual framework that can help us better understand these mixed effects of temperature. Most of the submitted articles have a physiological focus, for which many germination experiments have been performed. However, this special issue also includes a molecular analysis by Née et al., in which the earlier identified dormancy master regulator DELAY OF GERMINATION 1 (DOG1) is studied in more detail. This suggests a role for DOG1 in the induction of secondary dormancy in Brassica napus. Overall, I hope that we have succeeded in bringing together an informative and interesting issue, for which I would like to thank all the contributors. I am also grateful to Dr Henk Hilhorst, for inviting me to edit this issue and for facilitating the editorial process. Special thanks are also due to all the reviewers for their criticisms and suggestions, without which this issue would not have been possible.