Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:12:12.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An anarchical society (of fascist states): Theorising illiberal solidarism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2021

Kye J. Allen Open the ORCID record for Kye J. Allen [Opens in a new window]
Kye J. Allen*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While scholars within the English School have increasingly approached the traditionally liberal concept of solidarism in a normatively agnostic fashion, the idea of an ‘illiberal solidarism’ and historical manifestations thereof remain underexplored. One notable case in point surrounds the peculiar body of Italian interwar international thought, herein referred to as ‘international Fascism’. By discerning a synchronic outline of international Fascism, alongside the manner by which this project mutated and ultimately failed as it transformed from a vision theorised in the abstract to a practical initiative under the auspices of the Fascist regime, this article offers historical and theoretical insights into the realisability of illiberal forms of solidarism. Combining this historical account with theoretical insights derived from Reus-Smit's study on international order under conditions of cultural diversity, this article argues that the realisation of some form of solidarism necessitates the acceptance of a substantive pluralist component. Yet messianic illiberal visions that endeavour to retain the states-system, while simultaneously asserting the superiority of one community or a highly exclusionary vision of the ‘good life’, ostensibly lack the capacity to reconcile the contradictions inherent in efforts to universalise such projects.

Keywords

International SocietyFascismEnglish SchoolSolidarismInternationalismSociety of States
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 583 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

The online version of this article has been updated since original publication. A notice detailing the change has been published at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210522000195.

References

1 Following the historiography, ‘fascism’ is used to refer to the ideology as a generic phenomenon, while ‘Fascism’ pertains to the specific Italian regime or ideology.

2 This article adopts Kallis's terminology. International Fascism denotes an identifiable international imaginary professed by key figures within interwar Italy. Kallis, Aristotle A., ‘From CAUR to EUR: Italian fascism, the “myth of Rome” and the pursuit of international primacy’, Patterns of Prejudice, 50:4–5 (2016), pp. 359–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Griffin, Roger, ‘Europe for the Europeans: Fascist myths of the European new order 1922–1992’, in Feldman, Matthew (ed.), A Fascist Century: Essays by Roger Griffin (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 132–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 143).

4 Laqueur, Walter, Fascism: Past, Present, Future (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 218Google Scholar.

5 Herren, Madeleine, ‘Fascist internationalism’, in Sluga, Glenda and Clavin, Patricia (eds), Internationalisms: A Twentieth-Century History (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 191–212 (p. 195)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See, for example, Moraes, Marco, ‘Competing internationalisms at the league of nations secretariat, 1933–1940’, in Ikonomou, Haakon A. and Gram-Skjoldager, Karen (eds), The League of Nations: Perspectives from the Present (Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 2019), pp. 51–61Google Scholar; Steffek, Jens, ‘Fascist internationalism’, Millennium, 44:1 (2015), pp. 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Cochran, Molly, ‘Normative theory in the English School’, in Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel M. (eds), Guide to the English School in International Relations (Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), pp. 185–203 (p. 190)Google Scholar.

8 Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 See, for example, Suganami, Hidemi, ‘The argument of the English School’, in Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi (eds), The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 43–80 (pp. 71–2)Google Scholar.

10 Reus-Smit, Christian, On Cultural Diversity: International Theory in a World of Difference (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phillips, Andrew and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds), Culture and Order in World Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar.

11 On the political thought of Spirito and Volpicelli, see Gregor, A. James, Mussolini's Intellectuals: Fascist Social and Political Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

12 Bull, Hedley, ‘The Grotian conception of international society’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968), pp. 51–73 (p. 52)Google Scholar.

13 See inter alia Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Wheeler, Nicholas J. and Dunne, Timothy, ‘Hedley Bull's pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will’, International Affairs, 72:1 (1996), pp. 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Bull, ‘The Grotian conception’, p. 52.

15 Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2014), p. 91Google Scholar.

16 Bull, ‘The Grotian conception’, p. 53.

17 Dunne, Timothy, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998), p. 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 See, for example, Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

19 Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Imagining society: Constructivism and the English School’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4:3 (2002), pp. 487–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Buzan, From International to World Society, p. 158.

21 Bellamy, Alex J., ‘Conclusion: Whither international society?’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.), International Society and its Critics (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 283–95Google Scholar; Buzan, From International to World Society; Hurrell, Andrew, On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holbraad, Carsten, Internationalism and Nationalism in European Political Thought (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Buzan, From International to World Society, pp. 139–43.

23 Dunne, Timothy, ‘System, state and society: How does it all hang together?’, Millennium, 34:1 (2005), pp. 157–70 (p. 158)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Hurrell, On Global Order, p. 59.

25 Mayall, James, World Politics: Progress and its Limits (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2000), p. 14Google Scholar, emphasis added.

26 Hurrell, On Global Order, ch. 3; Ikenberry, G. John, ‘The liberal international order and its discontents’, Millennium, 38:3 (2010), pp. 509–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Cultural diversity and international order’, International Organization, 71:4 (2017), pp. 851–85 (p. 851)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Reus-Smit, ‘Cultural diversity’, p. 878.

29 Evidently, the comparatively pluralistic framework within Europe historically coexisted with a ‘civilising’ pattern in Western relations with the extra-European world. See Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Reus-Smit, ‘Imagining society’, p. 503.

31 Ibid.

32 Osiander, Andreas, ‘Sovereignty, international relations, and the Westphalian myth’, International Organization, 55:2 (2001), pp. 251–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Reus-Smit, On Cultural Diversity, p. 199.

34 Alex J. Bellamy, ‘Conclusion’, p. 291.

35 Reus-Smit, On Cultural Diversity, p. 218.

36 Schouenborg, Laust, ‘Exploring Westphalia's blind spots: Exceptionalism meets the English School’, Geopolitics, 17:1 (2012), pp. 130–52 (p. 139)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Griffin, Roger, The Nature of Fascism (London, UK: Routledge, 1991), p. 26Google Scholar.

38 On formative debates on the exportation of fascism, see Caprariis, Luca de, ‘“Fascism for export”? The rise and eclipse of the Fasci Italiani all'Estero’, Journal of Contemporary History, 35:2 (2000), pp. 151–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gentile, Emilio, ‘I Fasci Italiani All'Estero: The “foreign policy” of the Fascist Party’, in Larsen, Stein Ugelvik (ed.), Fascism Outside Europe: The European Impulse against Domestic Conditions in the Diffusion of Global Fascism (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2001), pp. 95–115Google Scholar.

39 Quoted in de Caprariis, ‘Fascism for export’, p. 169.

40 Garau, Salvatore, ‘The internalisation of Italian fascism in the face of German national socialism, and its impact on the British Union of Fascists’, Politics, Religion & Ideology, 15:1 (2014), pp. 45–63 (p. 47)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Oswald Mosley, ‘On to fascist revolution’, Blackshirt (1 February 1933), p. 1.

42 Bauerkämper, Arnd, ‘A new consensus? Recent research on fascism in Europe, 1918–1945’, History Compass, 4:3 (2006), pp. 536–66 (p. 553)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Griffin, ‘Europe for the Europeans’, p. 143.

44 See Gravelli, Asvero, ‘Towards a fascist Europe’, in Griffin, Roger (ed.), Fascism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. 66–7Google Scholar.

45 Morgan, Philip, Fascism in Europe, 1919–1945 (Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2003), p. 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Gravelli, ‘Towards a fascist Europe’, p. 66.

47 Ibid.

48 Ibid.

49 Ibid.

50 Wanrooij, Bruno, ‘The rise and fall of Italian fascism as a generational revolt’, Journal of Contemporary History, 22:3 (1987), pp. 401–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Ledeen, Michael Arthur, Universal Fascism: The Theory and Practice of the Fascist International, 1928–1936 (New York, NY: Howard Fertig, 1972), pp. 20–1Google Scholar.

52 Quoted in Ledeen, Michael Arthur, ‘Italian fascism and youth’, Journal of Contemporary History, 4:3 (1969), pp. 137–54 (p. 141)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Ibid., p. 140.

54 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 79.

55 Ledeen, ‘Italian fascism’, p. 137.

56 Quoted in Duranti, Marco, ‘European integration, human rights, and romantic internationalism’, in Doumanis, Nicholas (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of European History, 1914–1945 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 440–58 (p. 446)Google Scholar.

57 Quoted in ibid.

58 Gravelli, ‘Towards a fascist Europe’, pp. 66–7.

59 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 367.

60 See Dino Cofrancesco, ‘Ideas of the fascist government and party on Europe’, in Walter Lipgens (ed.), Documents on the History of European Integration, Vol. 1: Continental Plans for European Union, 1939–1945 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1985), pp. 179–99 (p. 179); Gusejnova, Dina, European Elites and Ideas of Empire, 1917–1957 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016), p. 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Duranti, ‘European integration’, p. 446.

62 Quoted in Steffek, Jens and Antonini, Francesca, ‘Toward Eurafrica! Fascism, corporativism, and Italy's colonial expansion’, in Hall, Ian (ed.), Radicals and Reactionaries in Twentieth-Century International Thought (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), pp. 145–69 (p. 150)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 89.

64 Kallis, Aristotle A., The Third Rome, 1922–43: The Making of the Fascist Capital (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), p. 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 On the myth of the ‘new man’, see Dagnino, Jorge, ‘The myth of the new man in Italian fascist ideology’, Fascism, 5:2 (2016), pp. 130–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Quoted in Ledeen, Universal Fascism, pp. 81–2.

67 Quoted in ibid., p. 82.

68 Quoted in Duranti, ‘European integration’, p. 446.

69 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 114.

70 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 229.

71 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 101.

72 Ibid., p. 102.

73 Quoted in ibid.

74 Garau, ‘The internalisation of Italian fascism’, p. 53.

75 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 85.

76 See Wight, Martin, ‘An anatomy of international thought’, Review of International Studies, 13:3 (1987), pp. 221–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 See, for example, Ikenberry, G. John, ‘Liberal internationalism and cultural diversity’, in Phillips, Andrew and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds), Culture and Order in World Politics (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 137–58Google Scholar.

78 John Williams, ‘The international society-world society distinction’, in Navari and Green (eds), Guide to the English School in International Relations, pp. 127–42 (p. 137).

79 Holbraad, Internationalism and Nationalism, p. 13.

80 Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (2nd edn, London: Macmillan Press, 1946), p. 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

81 Barnes, James Strachey, The Universal Aspects of Fascism (London, UK: Williams and Northgate, 1928), p. 239Google Scholar.

82 As Rota highlights, the original list of those who ‘agreed to participate … was an impressive collection of some of the most influential European politicians of the interwar period’, including Winston Churchill, Lloyd George, Louis Barthou, and Paul Hymans. Emanuel Rota, ‘“We will never leave”: The Reale Accademia d'Italia and the invention of a fascist Africanism’, Fascism, 2:2 (2013), pp. 161–82 (p. 166).

83 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 83.

84 Ibid., p. 62.

85 Griffin, ‘Europe for the Europeans’, p. 145.

86 For example, Gravelli edited a 1939 publication on the recreation of the Roman lifestyle. See Cannistraro, Philip V., ‘Mussolini's cultural revolution: Fascist or nationalist?’, Journal of Contemporary History, 7:3–4 (1972), pp. 115–39 (p. 127)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 228.

88 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 362.

89 Ibid.

90 Ledeen, Universal Fascism. See also Visser, Romke, ‘Fascist doctrine and the cult of the romanità’, Journal of Contemporary History, 27:1 (1992), pp. 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, pp. 18–25.

92 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 365.

93 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, pp. xv–xvi.

94 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 228.

95 Ibid.

96 Kallis, Aristotle A., ‘The “fascist effect”: On the dynamics of political hybridization in inter-war Europe’, in Pinto, Antonio Costa and Kallis, Aristotle A. (eds), Rethinking Fascism and Dictatorship in Europe (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 13–41 (pp. 26–7)Google Scholar.

97 Claudia Baldoli, ‘Italian Fascism in Britain: The Fasci Italiana all'Estero, the Italian Communities, and Fascist Sympathisers during Grandi Era (1932–1939)’ (PhD dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2002), p. 74.

98 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 369.

99 Ben-Ghiat, Ruth, Fascist Modernities: Italy, 1922–1945 (Berkley, CA: University of California, 2001), p. 148Google Scholar. See also Ludwig, Emil, Talks with Mussolini (London, UK: G. Allen & Unwin, 1932)Google Scholar.

100 See Garau, ‘The internalisation of Italian fascism’, p. 53; Payne, Stanley G., A History of Fascism, 1914–1945 (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996), p. 232Google Scholar.

101 Baldoli, ‘Italian Fascism in Britain’, p. 74.

102 Quoted in ibid., p. 75.

103 Ibid., p. 210.

104 Garau, ‘The internalisation of Italian fascism’, p. 50.

105 Ibid.

106 Bauerkämper, Arnd, ‘Ambiguities of transnationalism: Fascism in Europe between pan-Europeanism and ultra-nationalism, 1919–39’, German Historical Institute Bulletin, 29:2 (2007), pp. 43–67 (p. 56)Google Scholar.

107 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 369.

108 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, pp. 127–8.

109 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 368.

110 Quoted in Platon, Mircea, ‘The Iron Guard and the “modern states”: Iron Guard leaders Vasile Marin and Ion I. Moţa, and the “new European order”’, Fascism, 1:2 (2012), pp. 65–90 (p. 80)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

111 Ibid.

112 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 371.

113 Ibid., p. 368.

114 Cassels, Alan, Ideology and International Relations in the Modern World (Oxon, UK: Routledge, 1996), p. 158Google Scholar.

115 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 238.

116 Ibid., pp. 236–7.

117 See, for example, Kuck, Jordan, ‘Renewed Latvia: A case study of the transnational fascism model’, Fascism, 2:2 (2013), pp. 183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

118 Payne, A History of Fascism, p. 229; Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, pp. 370–1.

119 Platon, ‘The Iron Guard’, p. 78–9.

120 Naturally, the Montreux Conference was condemned within German circles, such as Rosenberg's newspaper, Volkischer Beobachter. Hans Fredrik Dahl, Quisling: A Study in Treachery, trans. Anne-Marie Stanton-Ife (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 113.

121 Garau, Salvatore, ‘Between “spirit” and “science”: The emergence of Italian fascist antisemitism through the 1920s and 1930s’, Holocaust Studies, 15:1–2 (2009), pp. 37–58 (p. 48)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

122 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, pp. 369–70.

123 Quoted in Cassels, Alan, Mussolini's Early Diplomacy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 380Google Scholar.

124 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 116.

125 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 370.

126 Quoted in Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 115.

127 Ibid., pp. 109–10; Morgan, Fascism in Europe, pp. 170–1.

128 Ledeen, Michael A., ‘The evolution of Italian fascist antisemitism’, Jewish Social Studies, 37:1 (1975), pp. 3–17 (p. 7)Google Scholar.

129 Quoted in Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 109.

130 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 118; Dahl, Quisling, p. 112.

131 ‘International: Pax Romanizing’, Time (31 December 1934), p. 16.

132 Claudia Baldoli, ‘Anglo-Italian fascist solidarity?: The shift from Italophilia to naziphilia in the BUF’, in Julie V. Gottlieb and Thomas O. Linehan (eds), The Culture of Fascism: Visions of the Far Right in Britain (London, UK: I. B. Tauris, 2004), pp. 147–61 (p. 156).

133 José Antonio Primo de Rivera, ‘José Antonio's statement regarding the international fascist congress (December 18, 1934)’, in Charles F. pell (ed.), Mediterranean Fascism, 1919–1945 (New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1970), pp. 278–9 (p. 278).

134 Ibid.

135 Albanese, Matteo and del Hierro, Pablo, Transnational Fascism in the Twentieth Century: Spain, Italy and the Global Neo-Fascist Network (London, UK: Bloomsbury, 2016), p. 32Google Scholar.

136 Platon, ‘The Iron Guard’, p. 78.

137 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 120.

138 Ibid., p. 119.

139 Garau, ‘The internalisation of Italian fascism’, p. 54.

140 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 121.

141 Bauerkämper, ‘Ambiguities of transnationalism’, p. 57.

142 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 232.

143 Ibid.

144 Arnd Bauerkämper, ‘Interwar fascism in Europe and beyond: Toward a transnational radical right’, in Martin Durham and Margaret Power (eds), New Perspectives on the Transnational Right (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 39–66 (pp. 50–1).

145 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 372.

146 Garau, ‘Between “spirit” and “science”’, p. 49; Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, p. 372.

147 Kallis, The Third Rome, pp. 239–40.

148 Kallis, Aristotle A., ‘Fascism and the Jews: From the internationalisation to a “fascist anti-Semitism”’, Holocaust Studies, 15:1–2 (2009), pp. 15–34 (p. 23)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

149 For an overview of the ‘imitation paradigm’, see Napoli, Olindo De, ‘The origin of the racist laws under fascism: A problem of historiography’, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 17:1 (2012), pp. 106–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

150 Adler, Franklin, ‘Why Mussolini turned on the Jews’, Patterns of Prejudice, 39:3 (2005), pp. 285–300 (p. 285)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151 Garau, ‘Between “spirit” and “science”’, p. 49; Kallis, ‘Fascism and the Jews’, p. 26.

152 Ledeen, Universal Fascism, p. 134.

153 Bauerkämper, Arnd, ‘Transnational fascism: Cross-border relations between regimes and movements in Europe, 1922–1939’, East Central Europe, 37:2–3 (2010), pp. 214–46 (pp. 231–4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

154 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, pp. 372–3.

155 Baldoli, ‘Italian Fascism in Britain’, p. 197.

156 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 234.

157 Kallis, ‘From CAUR to EUR’, pp. 373–5.

158 Kallis, The Third Rome, p. 234.

159 Martin, Benjamin G., The Nazi-Fascist New Order for European Culture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016), p. 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

160 Roberts, David D., Fascist Interactions: Proposals for a New Approach to Fascism and its Era, 1919–1945 (New York, NY: Berghahn, 2016), pp. 146–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

161 On the ‘New Order’, see Mazower, Mark, Hitler's Empire: Nazi Rule in Occupied Europe (London, UK: Penguin, 2009)Google Scholar.

162 Thanks are offered to the anonymous reviewer for this incisive comment.

163 Hurrell, On Global Order, p. 48.

164 Buranelli, Filippo Costa, ‘Authoritarianism as an institution? The case of Central Asia’, International Studies Quarterly, 64:4 (2020), pp. 1005–16 (p. 1005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

165 Ibid., p. 1007.

166 Wight, ‘An anatomy of international thought’.

167 Wight, Martin, Power Politics, eds Bull, Hedley and Holbraad, Carsten (London, UK: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1978), p. 86Google Scholar.

168 Wight, ‘An anatomy’, p. 226.

169 Griffin, ‘Europe for the Europeans’, p. 152.

170 Buranelli, ‘Authoritarianism as an institution’, p. 1005.

171 Bevir, Mark and Hall, Ian, ‘Interpreting the English School: History, science and philosophy’, Journal of International Political Theory, 16:2 (2020), pp. 120–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

172 Ibid., p. 121.

173 Ibid. See also Buzan, Barry, ‘The English School: An underexploited resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27:3 (2001), pp. 471–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

174 Drolet, Jean-François and Williams, Michael C., ‘Radical conservatism and global order: International theory and the new right’, International Theory, 10:3 (2018), pp. 285–313 (pp. 285–6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For recent efforts in this direction, see Orellana, Pablo de and Michelsen, Nicholas, ‘Reactionary internationalism: The philosophy of the new right’, Review of International Studies, 45:5 (2019), pp. 748–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Abrahamsen, Rita, Drolet, Jean-François, Gheciu, Alexandra, Narita, Karin, Vucetic, Srdjan, and Williams, Michael, ‘Confronting the international political sociology of the new right’, International Political Sociology, 14:1 (2020), pp. 94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

175 Drolet and Williams, ‘Radical conservatism’, p. 288.

176 Steffek, ‘Fascist internationalism’, pp. 3–22.

177 Ibid.

178 Moraes, ‘Competing internationalisms’, p. 56.

179 Bell, Duncan, ‘Writing the world (remix)’, in Schmidt, Brian C. and Guilhot, Nicolas (eds), Historiographical Investigations in International Relations (London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), pp. 15–50 (p. 20)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.