1. Introduction
Typically, neutron radiography[Reference Brenizer1] with
a high spatial resolution tries to solve two types of tasks: (i) to perform
self-imaging of large-size (Figure 1a)
or tiny (Figure 1b) neutron sources and
(ii) to perform imaging of the internal structure of matter by neutron
absorption (Figure 1c). Regardless of
the scientific or industrial application, there is a requirement to develop neutron
detectors with a spatial resolution improvement of up to
$5{-}10~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
and with a high sensitivity (few percent) to variation in material
thickness and structure. For example, in the development of new electrical
devices[Reference Lehmann, Boillat, Scherrer and Frei2–Reference Butler, Lehmann and Schillinger5] and for neutron source reconstruction
from pinhole imaging developed for inertial confined fusion (ICF) experiments using
laser irradiation[Reference Grim, Morgan, Wilke, Gobby, Christensen and Wilson6–Reference Volegov, Danly, Fittinghoff, Grim, Guler, Izumi, Ma, Merrill, Warrick, Wilde and Wilson9], a spatial resolution on the scale of a
few microns is needed.
Figure 1. Schematic layouts for neutron radiography by LiF detector. Self-radiography of (a) large-size and (b) tiny neutron sources using a pinhole imaging approach and high-resolution LiF crystal detectors. (c) Neutron radiography of the internal structure of objects. In such a case the object is placed in close contact to the LiF crystal.
Unfortunately, the current best available neutron detectors allow a spatial resolution
of only around
$15{-}20~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
or worse to be reached. For example, the neutron imaging plate, where
the neutron converter
$(\text{Gd}_{2}\text{O}_{3})$
is mixed with the photo-stimulated luminescence material (BaFBr:
$\text{Eu}^{2+}$
), has high sensitivity[Reference Takahashi, Tazaki, Miyahara, Karasawa and Niimura10], with a measured line spread function of
$58~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
[Reference Kobayashi, Satoh and Matsubayashi11]. Neutron images
have also been recorded with Gd- or B-doped microchannel plates with cross-delay line
readout, resulting in an estimated spatial resolution of
$17~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
[Reference Siegmund, Vallerga, Tremsin, Mcphate and Feller12]. Real-time
neutron imaging has been demonstrated by projecting the fluorescence from a LiZnS
scintillator onto a high-sensitivity CCD camera[Reference Kardjilov, Hilger, Manke, Strobl, Treimer and Banhart13]. Recently, dynamic neutron images have been recorded with a neutron
color image intensifier, enabling real-time observation of dynamic phenomena with
30 frames/s video pictures, at a thermal neutron flux of
$1.5\times 10^{8}~\text{n}/(\text{cm}^{2}~\text{s})$
[Reference Nittoh, Konagai, Noji and Miyabe14]. Recently, great
progress in the development of large neutron imaging systems for ICF has allowed
$15~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
spatial resolution to be reached in a wide field of view[Reference Caillaud, Landoas, Briat, Kime, Rossé, Thfoin, Bourgade, Disdier, Glebov, Marshall and Sangster8]. In such a case neutrons transmitted by
the aperture are converted to visible light in a scintillator array that is subsequently
recorded by a CCD camera. To achieve a high spatial resolution in such experiments a
large magnification is needed because the spatial resolution of the detector is
${\sim}650~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
.
At the same time, it is well known that point defects or, as they are also called, color centers (CCs) are produced sufficiently easily under interaction of particles or photons with LiF crystal[Reference Schulman and Compton15]. Such CCs could be hosted in LiF at room temperature for a very long time and then under excitation by UV radiation the CCs would emit photoluminescence (PL) in the visible spectral range and allow submicron spatial resolution to be reached for soft x-ray imaging when the penetration depth of the photons is on the scale of tens or hundreds of nanometers. Recently, LiF crystal and film detectors have been successfully used for high-performance soft x-ray conventional and phase-contrast imaging[Reference Baldacchini, Bollanti, Bonfigli, Flora, Di Lazzaro, Lai, Marolo, Montereali, Murra, Faenov, Pikuz, Lisi, Tomassetti, Reale, Reale, Ritucci, Limongi, Palladino, Francucci, Martelluci and Petrocelli16–Reference Reale, Bonfigli, Lai, Flora, Albertano, Di Giorgio, Mezi, Montereali, Faenov, Pikuz, Almaviva, Francucci, Gaudio, Martellucci, Richetta and Poma22] of different nanofoils or biological objects. They have also started to be widely used for characterization intensity profiles or focusing properties of x-ray laser or high-order harmonic beams[Reference Faenov, Kato, Tanaka, Pikuz, Kishimoto, Ishino, Nishikino, Fukuda, Bulanov and Kawachi23–Reference Pikuz, Faenov, Magnitskiy, Nagorskiy, Tanaka, Ishino, Nishikino, Fukuda, Kando, Kato and Kawachi30]. Dislocations, point defect clusters and cavities in crystals irradiated by neutrons have been investigated already for many decades[Reference Gilman and Johnston31, Reference Lakshmanaun, Madhusoodanan, Natarajan and Panigrahi32], but only recently we proposed to use LiF crystals as high-performance neutron imaging detectors[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33–Reference Yasuda, Matsubayashi, Sakai, Nojima, Iikura, Katagiri, Takano, Pikuz and Faenov36]. In this paper we will give an overview of our main results performed for characterization of such a detector and its use as a high-spatial-resolution thermal neutron radiography and discuss the applications of such a detector in areas where a high spatial resolution with a high image gradation resolution is needed. We also discuss possible applications of LiF imaging detectors for diagnostics of different continuous and pulsed high-intensity neutron sources, including plasma sources such as laser and z-pinch produced plasma.
2. Principles of neutron imaging generation in LiF crystals and experimental procedure
In LiF, the
$\text{F}^{3+}$
and
$\text{F}^{2}$
CCs are formed by aggregation of the F centers, which are produced by
irradiation of ionizing radiation. In our case of neutron beam irradiation (see Figures
2 and 3a)
the following reaction takes place with a cross-section of 940 barns for
thermal neutrons:
$^{6}\text{Li}+\text{n}\rightarrow {\it\alpha}~(\text{2.05 MeV})+^{3}\text{H (2.73 MeV)}$
, where the energies of the reaction products are shown in
parentheses[Reference Knoll37]. It is necessary
to stress that natural lithium is composed of 7.40%
$^{6}\text{Li}$
and 92.60%
$^{7}\text{Li}$
, and only
$^{6}\text{Li}$
is involved in the processes mentioned above. The ranges of
${\it\alpha}$
and
$^{3}\text{H}$
in LiF are estimated to be
${\sim}6$
and
${\sim}33~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
, respectively. This means that that the spatial resolution of LiF for
neutron imaging is determined mainly by the range of the particle propagation inside the
LiF crystal. Using such propagation ranges it is possible to estimate that the
${\it\alpha}$
and
$^{3}\text{H}$
particles will deposit energy of approximately 140 and
33 eV in each lattice cell of the LiF crystal, respectively. In LiF, the F
centers are created by excitation of valence electrons to the conduction band with an
excitation energy[Reference Schulman and Compton15, Reference Baldacchini, Bollanti, Bonfigli, Flora, Di Lazzaro, Lai, Marolo, Montereali, Murra, Faenov, Pikuz, Lisi, Tomassetti, Reale, Reale, Ritucci, Limongi, Palladino, Francucci, Martelluci and Petrocelli16] of 14 eV. It follows that the energy
deposited by the
${\it\alpha}$
particles is sufficient to create many (
${\sim}10$
) F centers simultaneously in each lattice, leading to efficient
formation of the
$\text{F}^{3+}$
and
$\text{F}^{2}$
CCs (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Principles of neutron imaging generation in LiF crystals.
Figure 3. In image readout, luminescence from the LiF crystal was observed with a laser
scanning confocal luminescence microscope. The
${\it\lambda}=488~\text{nm}$
line of an argon laser was used for excitation and
luminescence from the CCs at
${\it\lambda}>510~\text{nm}$
[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33–Reference Yasuda, Matsubayashi, Sakai, Nojima, Iikura, Katagiri, Takano, Pikuz and Faenov36].
The thermal neutron radiography facility (TNRF-2) at the research reactor JRR-3M
(20 MW thermal output) at JAEA was used for micron-scale neutron imaging in
our experiments. The beam line for TNRF-2 provides[Reference Matsubayashi, Kobayashi, Hibiki and Mishima38] thermal neutrons (peak energy of approximately
30 meV) with a flux of
$1.0\times 10^{8}~\text{n}/(\text{cm}^{2}~\text{s})$
, and the
$L/D$
ratio varies from 100 to 460, where
$L$
is the distance from the reactor to the sample and
$D$
is the aperture size at the reactor. In the TNRF-2 station, the dose
rate of the gamma rays has been measured to be 2.16 Sv/h. The image recording
and acquisition setup for the neutron imaging experiments using LiF crystals is shown in
Figure 1(c). In image recording, the
objects were placed in close contact to the LiF crystal mounted in an Al holder and
covered with an Al foil. A LiF crystal of 20 mm diameter and 3 mm
thickness, polished on both sides, was used in our experiments. The procedures for
neutron irradiation of different samples and the readout process were described in
detail in Refs. [Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33–Reference Yasuda, Matsubayashi, Sakai, Nojima, Iikura, Katagiri, Takano, Pikuz and Faenov36].
After recording, the images of the neutron beam intensity distribution created inside
the LiF crystal by
$\text{F}^{3+}$
and
$\text{F}^{2}$
CCs were read out using a laser confocal fluorescence microscope
(Olympus model FV-300), as shown in Figure 3(b). The LiF crystal under the microscope was illuminated with the
488 nm line of an argon ion laser and the luminescence from the CCs at
${>}510~\text{nm}$
was observed. Different samples were used for characterization of the
LiF crystal as a high-performance neutron imaging detector.
3. Features of LiF crystal as a neutron imaging detector
Several important parameters of the LiF neutron imaging detector were characterized during our experiments.
3.1. Spatial resolution
The spatial resolution of the LiF crystal neutron imaging detector was quantitatively
evaluated by two different approaches. First of all, we used specially produced
masks, which consisted of line pair patterns fabricated on a 0.005 mm
thick Gd film evaporated on a glass plate[Reference Yasuda, Matsubayashi, Sakai, Nojima, Iikura, Katagiri, Takano, Pikuz and Faenov36]. The images of the small line pairs on the dark field were
observed using a LiF single crystal detector and are presented in
Figure 4. From this figure, splits
in the small line pairs as little as
$10~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
wide are clearly seen with good contrast in the images. This result
demonstrates that the LiF crystal neutron detector has potential for use in the
practical evaluation of the spatial resolution of noble gas imaging having an
ultra-high spatial resolution of
${\sim}5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
.
Figure 4. Schematic diagrams and sizes of the line pairs produced on
$5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thickness Gd patterns coated onto the overall surface of a
glass substrate and their images obtained by using the LiF crystal neutron
imaging detector (top). Line-pair images obtained using the LiF single
crystal detector and line profiles of the pairs with widths of
$10~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
[Reference Yasuda, Matsubayashi, Sakai, Nojima, Iikura, Katagiri, Takano, Pikuz and Faenov36]
(bottom). The spatial resolution on the scale of
$5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
is clearly seen.
As a second approach[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33], we
studied the spatial resolution of the LiF neutron detector by measuring the sharpness
of the edges for low and heavy neutron absorbed materials. In Figure 5 the neutron images of the edges of a
$100~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Cd (low-neutron-absorption material) and a
$100~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Gd (high-neutron-absorption material) plate are presented.
The radiography image of the
$100~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Cd plate was recorded at only 10 s neutron
exposure. Comparison of this image with a Gaussian error function shows that the best
fit to the experiment corresponds to a spatial resolution of
${\sim}5.4~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
, where the spatial resolution is defined as the distance between
10% and 90% of the transmittance of the fitted curve. This spatial resolution agrees
well with the estimated stopping range of
${\it\alpha}$
particles in LiF (
${\sim}6~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
). The neutron images of the 100
${\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Gd plate (see Figure 5b) match the case when almost complete absorption of the thermal neutrons
with a transmittance of only
$3.6\times 10^{-7}$
takes place. The neutron image of the Gd plate shown in
Figure 5(b) is compared with the
optical microscope image and it is clearly demonstrated that the detailed structures
seen in the optical image are well reproduced in the neutron image. We should stress
that small structures with a very tiny width are well resolved in the neutron image.
Moreover, the trace of the magnified part of the image of a small crack presented in
Figure 5(b) gives a value of the
spatial resolution of
${\sim}5.5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
, which is in good consistency with the
${\sim}5.4~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
spatial resolution estimated in Figure 5(a) for low-neutron-absorption material.
Figure 5. (a) Neutron image of a
$100~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Cd plate taken with 10 s exposure time
and a trace of the neutron image across the edge, which is compared with a
calculation at a spatial resolution of
$5.4~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33].
(b) Neutron radiography images of a 100 mm thick Gd
plate of triangular shape[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33]. Optical microscope and neutron images of the same part
near the edge obviously demonstrate a high-resolution quality of the LiF
neutron imaging detector comparable with optical microscopy imaging. The
magnified image of a small crack in the Gd plate and the line scan of this
part, shown by the blue lines, clearly manifest high contrast and spatial
resolution of such images. We could see that this line scan has a best fit
with a modeled curve with a
$5.5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
width (dashed curve).
Figure 6. (a) Comparison of the neutron images of the Au wires of 42, 95
and
$287~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter recorded with exposure times of 10 and
30 min[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33]. (b) Comparison[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33] of the traces of the experimental intensity
transmittance of neutrons through the Au wires (solid curves) with the
theoretical transmittance (dashed curves) for two attenuation beam
coefficients. It is clearly seen that the best coincidence between the
modeling and the experimental curves is obtained for
${\it\mu}=5.66~\text{cm}^{-1}$
(bottom panel). Changes of
${\it\mu}$
of even
${\sim}12\%$
(
${\it\mu}=6.36~\text{cm}^{-1}$
) show a large disagreement between the theoretical and
experimental curves, which testifies to the high quality and sensitivity of
the LiF crystal neutron imaging detector. (c) A plot of the
luminescent intensity from the CCs in LiF versus the neutron fluence on
LiF[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33]. The neutron
fluence was varied by the neutron exposure time and the attenuation of the
neutron flux by various filters, such as Au wires, Au foils and Cd plates.
The straight line is a fit to the data, showing a good linear response of
the LiF to the neutron fluence.
3.2. Sensitivity and linearity of the LiF crystal imaging detector
Other very important characteristics of any detector are the sensitivity and
linearity of the detector response to different fluxes of incoming radiation
intensity. We conducted different experiments[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33] to measure these important parameters. Figure 6(a) shows the neutron images of Au wires of 42, 95
and
$287~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter, recorded at 10 and 30 min exposure,
corresponding to neutron fluences of
$6\times 10^{10}$
and
$1.8\times 10^{11}~\text{n}/\text{cm}^{2}$
, respectively. It is clearly seen from Figure 6(a) that all of the three wires are resolved,
including the smallest wire of
$42~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter, which has an attenuation of only 2.35%. This demonstrates
that LiF has not only high spatial resolution but also high sensitivity, high imaging
contrast and, which is very important for neutron imaging detectors, the image
quality is free from granular noise that sometimes exists in other neutron imaging
detectors. Indeed, for the data presented in Figure 6(a) the signal-to-noise ratio has a very high value of
${\sim}50$
for the thinnest
$42~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter Au wire. As seen in Figure 6(b), there is a very good agreement between the experimental data
and the theoretical curves for the neutron transmittance across the radial direction
of the wires in the case of using the theoretical transmittance
${\it\mu}=5.66$
(bottom panel). This transmittance corresponds to the energy of the
thermal neutrons applied for the irradiation of the Au wires. We would like to stress
that a very small change of the neutron transmittance coefficient value, for example
to
${\it\mu}=6.36$
, could be clearly distinguished by comparison with experimental
curves (see the upper panel in Figure 6b). This means that if the energy of the thermal neutrons is known with high
accuracy the transmittance coefficient value can be measured with high accuracy.
Additional proof of the high spatial resolution, high sensitivity and high contrast
of neutron imaging by LiF crystal detectors in the case of imaging of
high-neutron-absorption materials is obviously given by Figure 7. In this experiment the gadolinium plate, which
was hammered during cutting by scissors, was irradiated by a neutron beam for
30 min. The obtained image shows that changes of thickness of the hammered
Gd plate from approximately 0 to
${\sim}25~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
could be measured with an accuracy of some microns. Additionally,
all tiny defects on the surface and edge of the foil (for example, such as the burr
in Figure 7) could be evidently
distinguished with a resolution of a few microns and measured.
Figure 7. Neutron radiography of a
$25~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
thick Gd plate. A defect with a size of
${\sim}7~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
and some micron-scale changes of thickness of the hammered
Gd plate edge (due to cutting the Gd plate with scissors) are clearly seen
in the magnified images of different parts of the sample[Reference Faenov, Matsubayashi, Pikuz, Fukuda, Kando, Yasuda, Iikura, Nojima, Sakai, Shiozawa and Kato35].
The linearity of the LiF detector was checked (see Figure 6c) by comparing the luminescence intensities of
the images irradiated with the different neutron fluences which were varied by the
exposure time (30 min, 10 min and 10 s) and the
attenuation of neutron intensity by various materials (Au wires, Au foils and Cd
plates). From this figure we can see that the luminescence intensity is highly linear
to the neutron fluence over almost three orders of magnitude[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33], starting from
$3\times 10^{8}$
to
$1.8\times 10^{11}~\text{n}/\text{cm}^{2}$
. It is demonstrated that the LiF crystal imaging detector has a
very high dynamic range similar to the dynamic range of LiF crystal for x-ray
imaging[Reference Baldacchini, Bollanti, Bonfigli, Flora, Di Lazzaro, Lai, Marolo, Montereali, Murra, Faenov, Pikuz, Lisi, Tomassetti, Reale, Reale, Ritucci, Limongi, Palladino, Francucci, Martelluci and Petrocelli16]. We should stress
that luminescence, produced by neutron irradiation, is observed even for the area
covered with highly attenuating filters (see Figure 6c). From the measured noise of the neutron images, the minimum
detection level of neutrons with LiF was estimated to be approximately
$2.5\times 10^{8}~\text{n}/\text{cm}^{2}$
. This neutron fluence corresponds to the
${\sim}2.5~\text{s}$
exposure time of the JRR-3M neutron facility used in these
experiments[Reference Matsubayashi, Kobayashi, Hibiki and Mishima38]. Indeed, we
could clearly record the neutron images with 10 seconds exposure, as shown
in Figure 5(a). It is necessary to
mention that the neutron detection efficiency of LiF is partly limited by the
absorption of the neutrons in LiF. Actually, since the attenuation coefficient of
thermal neutrons in LiF is estimated to be
$5.2~\text{cm}^{-1}$
, only 0.26% of the neutrons are absorbed in the
${\sim}5~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
depth of LiF, which corresponds to the focal depth of the
$20\times$
microscope objective. To check this point we read out neutron
images not only from the front side but also from the rear side of the
3 mm LiF crystal. In this case clear neutron images were recorded from
both sides of the crystal. The intensity of the image from the rear of the LiF
crystal was sufficiently good, but the spatial resolution and contrast of this image
were worse compared with the image that was read out from the front. This occurred
due to the scattering when neutrons pass through the 3 mm thickness of the
LiF crystal.
Additional metrological testing of the LiF crystal neutron imaging sensitivity
provided in Ref. [Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda, Kato, Yasuda, Iikura, Nojima and Sakai34] by using the
standard neutron sensitivity indicator shows that holes with transmittance
differences of less than 2% could be observed. Moreover, all gaps in this indicator
with sizes from 22 to
$26~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
were also clearly observed. All of the above mentioned experimental
results show that LiF crystals have excellent characteristics as neutron imaging
detectors with high spatial resolution, high dynamic range and good contrast.
Figure 8. (a) Neutron images of a ball-point pen obtained by a tiling
sequence of
$4\times$
magnified images[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33]. A metal tube, a roller ball at the top and the ink in
the metal tube with strong neutron attenuation are obviously distinguished.
It is also clearly seen that a small air bubble of
$280~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter in the ink has moved to the upper part of the pen
between the first experiment with 30 min neutron exposure and the
second measurement with 10 min exposure. (b) A
schematic drawing of a small fuel cell and the neutron image of
it[Reference Faenov, Matsubayashi, Pikuz, Fukuda, Kando, Yasuda, Iikura, Nojima, Sakai, Shiozawa and Kato35]. Tiny details
with sizes of at least
${\sim}12~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
of the fuel cell structure and its inhomogeneity along and
perpendicular to the anode–cathode directions are evidently
resolved.
4. Imaging of samples with internal gas or water structures using the LiF neutron imaging detector
One of the main advantages of thermal neutron imaging in comparison to x-ray imaging is
the capability of observing materials comprising high- and low-
$Z$
elements. In Figure 8(a) neutron imaging[Reference Matsubayashi, Faenov, Pikuz, Fukuda and Kato33] of a
ball-point pen in which liquid ink is contained in a thin metal tube is presented. The
high contrast and good spatial resolution of the obtained image allow the change of the
metal tube diameter from
${\sim}370~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter at the smallest part of the pen to
${\sim}1040~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter at the largest to be distinguished. The metallic parts such
as the ink tube and the roller ball at the tip are obviously distinguished too.
Furthermore, it is unmistakably seen how an air bubble of
${\sim}280~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
diameter has accidentally moved from the top of the ink channel with
diameter
${\sim}700~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
further inside the tube in the direction of the roller bar between the
two measurements (see Figure 8(a), 30
and 10 min exposure neutron images).
A very important application of micron-sized neutron radiography is obtaining detailed
information about the water distribution in the membrane electrode assembly (MEA) and
the gas diffusion layer (GDL) in fuel cells. As is seen from Figure 8(b), such information can be obtained by neutron
irradiation of cells and registration of the image by the LiF crystal imaging
detector[Reference Faenov, Matsubayashi, Pikuz, Fukuda, Kando, Yasuda, Iikura, Nojima, Sakai, Shiozawa and Kato35]. A spatial
resolution of better than
$12~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
can be undoubtedly seen along the full field of view of
${\sim}1.5\times 4.5~(\text{mm})$
and allows us to distinguish the most minute details of the cell
structure.
The examples presented in this section show that neutron imaging with LiF is suitable
for the observation of detailed structures of low-
$Z$
materials with high spatial resolution and dynamic range.
5. Conclusion
The experimental results discussed in this paper show that LiF crystals have excellent
characteristics and great advantages compared with traditionally used neutron detectors
in areas where a micron-scale spatial resolution, a high dynamic range and a high
contrast are needed. Indeed, we demonstrated that the neutron images recorded with LiF
are almost free from granular noise, and the spatial resolution reaches
${\sim}5.4~{\rm\mu}\text{m}$
; the response is highly linear to the neutron fluence with a dynamic
range of at least
$10^{3}$
. As drawbacks, we should mention that the sensitivity of LiF to
thermal neutrons is not very high and is approximately
$2.5\times 10^{8}~\text{n}/\text{cm}^{2}$
. At the same time, it is obvious that it could be increased by least
an order of magnitude. Actually, we used natural LiF in our experiments, in which the
concentration of
$^{6}\text{Li}$
is not very high (the abundance is 7.4%). However, it is
expected that this sensitivity will be improved by
${\sim}13$
times if we use enriched
$^{6}\text{LiF}$
in place of natural LiF. The sensitivity could be further improved by
using poly-crystalline LiF, since poly-crystalline LiF coating has proved to have
${\sim}10$
times higher sensitivity than LiF single crystal without degrading the
resolution in soft x-ray imaging[Reference Baldacchini, Bollanti, Bonfigli, Flora, Di Lazzaro, Lai, Marolo, Montereali, Murra, Faenov, Pikuz, Lisi, Tomassetti, Reale, Reale, Ritucci, Limongi, Palladino, Francucci, Martelluci and Petrocelli16].
We hope that due to all of the abovementioned advantages of LiF crystal detectors, they
will be useful not only for quantitative evaluation of various object structures in
devices comprising low-
$Z$
elements (including Li-ion batteries and fuel cells) but also for
diagnostics of different continuous and pulsed high-intensity neutron sources, including
such plasma sources as laser and z-pinch produced plasma. It is necessary to mention
that the application of LiF detectors for fast neutron imaging will require a large
number of neutrons. Indeed, if the cross-sections for thermal neutron interaction with
LiF are
${\sim}950$
barn (for neutron energies of tens of meV), the
cross-sections for interaction of DT or DD fusion neutrons with LiF crystals are lower
by practically four orders of magnitude. In such a case, the intensity of the
thermonuclear neutron source should be very high for practical applications of LiF
imaging detectors. Meanwhile, in recent National Ignition Facility (NIF)
experiments[Reference Hurricane, Callahan, Casey, Celliers, Cerjan, Dewald, Dittrich, Döppner, Hinkel, Berzak Hopkins, Kline, Le Pape, Ma, MacPhee, Milovich, Pak, Park, Patel, Remington, Salmonson, Springer and Tommasini39] the fast neutron
yield has reached the enormous value of
${\sim}10^{16}$
neutrons per shot, and should be even higher in future experiments.
This means that in future experiments when neutron generation reaches
${\sim}10^{17}$
neutrons per shot, we could expect that at a distance of
50 cm from the target the neutron flux will be
${\sim}3\times 10^{12}~\text{n}/\text{cm}^{2}$
. Such a neutron flux should be sufficient for obtaining neutron images
using a LiF crystal detector in single shot at this distance. At the same time, as was
cited in Ref. [Reference Bernstein, Bleuel, Caggiano, Cerjan, Fortner, Gostic, Grant, Gharibyan, Hagmann, Hatarik, Henry, Sayre, Schneider, Stoeffl, Shaughnessy, McNabb, Yeamans, Zaitseva, Brown, Daub, Brickner, Davis, Goldblum, Van Bibber, Vujic, Basunia, Firestone, Hurst and Rogers40],
deuterium–tritium-loaded capsules at NIF can now regularly produce a plasma
with low-energy ‘ICF-thermal’ neutrons with density
${>}10^{21}~\text{neutrons cm}^{-3}$
. This high quantity of neutrons with energy in the range of
1 eV–100 keV gives hope for successful thermal neutron
imaging using LiF detectors due to the higher efficiency of their absorption compared
with MeV neutrons. It is also necessary to mention that, recently, LiF films embedded
with
$\text{Li}^{6}$
have been successfully used as converters of neutrons in tokomak
experiments with thermonuclear neutrons[Reference Angelone, Lattanzi, Pillon, Marinelli, Milani, Tucciarone, Verona-Rinati, Popoviche, Montereali, Vincenti and Murari41,
Reference Almaviva, Marinelli, Milani, Prestopino, Tucciarone, Verona, Verona-Rinati, Angelone, Lattanzi, Pillon, Montereali and Vincenti42]. The subsequent results give
confidence that LiF detectors could be successfully used for high-resolution imaging of
plasma neutron sources. Of course, direct experimental tests at laser fusion, z-pinch or
tokamak installations are needed to confirm the advantages of LiF detectors for
high-performance neutron imaging.
Acknowledgement
This work was partly supported by the RAS Presidium Program for Basic Research #13 and Russian Foundation for Basic Research grant #14-02-92107.
Open access
