Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:29:13.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring the Consumption of Eggs in Older Adults: a Questionnaire Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2016

E van den Heuvel
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB
JL Murphy
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, BH1 3LT, UK
KM Appleton
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Previous research suggests that perceived convenience, value for money, and perishability are important predictors of intakes of protein-rich foods in older adults(Reference Appleton1). Eggs are a nutrient dense, high quality source of protein(Reference Ruxton, Derbyshire and Gibson2), and compared to other protein rich foods, are easy to cook, of long shelf life, and low cost; and so may be of help in increasing protein intakes. To develop strategies to increase egg and protein intake(Reference Volpi, Campbell and Dwyer3), however, a thorough understanding of the barriers and facilitators to egg intakes in older adults is key.

Reasons for eating or not eating eggs in adults aged 55 years and older were identified in a focus group study(Reference van den Heuvel, Murphy and Appleton4) and then used in a structured questionnaire assessing: frequency of habitual egg intake, frequency of habitual intake of other protein-rich foods, agreement or disagreement with 76 statements on the reasons for eating/not eating eggs, and various demographic and lifestyle factors. The questionnaire was sent out to a National sample of 1065 adults. Responses from 205 participants (96 female, aged 55–80+ years, from across the UK) were included in analyses. A Principal Component Analysis on the 76 statements on egg intake generated 21 components, which were then analysed for their relative importance in predicting habitual egg consumption using a multiple linear regression model.

The results revealed that these 21 components, alongside all other variables assessed, significantly predicted egg consumption in the target sample (R = 0·510, R2 = 0·260, adjusted R2 = 0·166, F(23,181) = 2·765, p < 0·001). Higher egg intakes were independently associated with greater reports of liking, tastiness and adding variety to the diet (Beta = 0·261, p = 0·012); less firm adherence to stereotypes about the type of person who eats eggs (Beta = −0·159, p = 0·046); greater difficulty stopping eating eggs once started (Beta = 0·216, p = 0·004); and lower concerns over food safety (Beta = −0·145, p = 0·044). Of the demographic and lifestyle factors, higher egg intakes were also associated with a higher Body Mass Index (Beta = 0·160, p = 0·022).

These findings suggest that specific reasons for eating/not eating eggs are associated with higher egg intakes. Some of these reasons have previously been found to be associated in older adults with intakes of other protein-rich foods(Reference Appleton1, Reference Ruxton, Derbyshire and Gibson2, Reference Best and Appleton5) or other foods(Reference Hollis and Henry6), although some outcomes are unique to this study. These findings suggest that strategies for interventions to increase egg consumption in the older population should focus on liking, tastiness and adding variety to the diet; reducing stereotypes; and increasing perceptions of the moreish nature of some egg recipes/dishes. Reducing concerns over food safety may also increase egg intakes, but this would need to be handled carefully, such that it is the concerns that are reduced as opposed to food safety itself.

References

1.Appleton, KM (2015) Proc Nutr Soc 74, 319.10.1017/S0029665115003663Google Scholar
2.Ruxton, CHS, Derbyshire, E, & Gibson, S (2010) Nutr Food Sci 40, 263279.10.1108/00346651011043961Google Scholar
3.Volpi, E, Campbell, WW, & Dwyer, JT et al. (2013) J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68, 677681.10.1093/gerona/gls229Google Scholar
4.van den Heuvel, E, Murphy, JL, Appleton, KM (2015) Proc Nutr Soc 74, 314.10.1017/S0029665115003614Google Scholar
5.Best, RL & Appleton, KM (2011) Appetite 56, 179182.10.1016/j.appet.2010.10.011Google Scholar
6.Hollis, JH & Henry, CJK (2007) J Hum Nutr Diet 20, 345351.10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00796.xGoogle Scholar