No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Pickwick Papers and “Sam Weller's Scrap Sheet”: The Making of a Print-Neutral Public
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 January 2025
Abstract
The unprecedented popularity of Charles Dickens's first serial novel, The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club (1836–37), among all classes of readers helped shape Britain's mass reading public. The irrevocable change that Dickens effected on Victorian print culture is well established, but there is little discussion of how his early works interpreted the print culture in which they first circulated. I approach Pickwick according to the perspective of a little-known contemporary response, “Sam Weller's Scrap Sheet (1837),” printed by John Cleave. “Sam Weller's Scrap Sheet” cleverly reproduces the narrative, form, and material of Pickwick according to the perspective of a laboring-class reader. Its attention to print material and class identity informs a new reading of Pickwick: in order to unify disparate reading and writing cultures, I argue, Pickwick fictively binds together materials sourced from a variety of print cultures and redefines them unanimously as “paper.” As the “Scrap Sheet” makes clear, this effaces the productive agency of the “papers’” originating contexts. Tying together discussions from Pickwick’s reception history, print history, and media studies, this paper more broadly examines the tensions that accompanied shifting relationships to material print in early-industrial England.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Works Cited
Abraham, Adam. “Plagiarizing Pickwick: Imitations of Immortality.” Dickens Quarterly 32, no. 1 (2015): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Adam. “The Pickwick Phenomenon.” In Plagiarizing the Victorian Novel: Imitation, Parody, Aftertext, 23–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfano, Veronica, and Stauffer, Andrew J., eds. Virtual Victorians: Networks, Connections, Technologies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axton, William. “Unity and Coherence in The Pickwick Papers.” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 5, no. 4 (1965): 663–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, John. Other Dickens: From Pickwick to Chuzzlewit. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Brake, Laurel, and Demoor, Marysa. Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism in Great Britain and Ireland. Gent and London: Academia Press and The British Library, 2009.Google Scholar
Chittick, Kathryn. Dickens and the 1830s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cook, James. Bibliography of the Works of Charles Dickens, with Many Curious and Interesting Particulars Relating to His Works. London: Frank Kerslake, 1879.Google Scholar
De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, Steven F.. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dickens, Charles. To John Macrone, 3 August 1836. In The Pilgrim Edition of the Letters of Charles Dickens, vol. 1, 1820–1839, edited by House, Madeline and Storey, Graham. Oxford Scholarly Editions Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, Charles. The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club. 1837. Edited by Wormald, Mark. New York: Penguin Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna. Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth. The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Engel, Elliot D., and Margaret, F. King. “Pickwick’s Progress: The Critical Reception of The Pickwick Papers from 1836–1986.” Dickens Quarterly 3, no. 1 (1986): 56–66.Google Scholar
Flint, Christopher. The Appearance of Print in Eighteenth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, Paul. “The Random Selection of Victorian New Media.” Victorian Periodicals Review 42, no. 1 (2009): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitelman, Lisa. Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Durham: Duke University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Golden, Catherine J. Book Illustrated: Text, Image, and Culture, 1770–1930. New Castle: Oak Knoll Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hack, Daniel. The Material Interests of the Victorian Novel. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Han, Carrie Sickmann. “Pickwick's Other Papers: Continually Reading Dickens.” Victorian Literature and Culture 44, no. 1 (2016): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Helen. “Form and Reform: The ‘Miscellany Novel.’” Victorian Literature and Culture 41 (2013): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huett, Lorna. “Among the Unknown Public: Household Words, All the Year Round, and the Mass-Market Weekly Periodical in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” Victorian Periodicals Review 38, no. 1 (2005): 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Edward. “The Pursuit of an Unstamped Newspaper: Interactions between Prosecution and the Evolving Form, Politics, and Business Practices of John Cleave's Weekly Police Gazette (1834–1836).” Publishing History 65 (2009): 41–69.Google Scholar
James, Louis. “The Beginnings of a New Type of Popular Fiction: Plagiarisms of Dickens.” In Fiction for the Working Man, 45–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
John, Juliet. Dickens and Mass Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Adrian. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, Juliet. Dickens and Mass Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunzle, David. “Between Broadsheet Caricature and ‘Punch’: Cheap Newspaper Cuts for the Lower Classes in the 1830s.” Art Journal 43, no. 4 (1983): 339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, Sally. Dickens and the Popular Radical Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Maidment, Brian. “Scraps and Sketches: Miscellaneity, Commodity Culture, and Comic Prints, 1820–1840.” Interdisciplinary Studies in the Long Nineteenth Century 5 (2007): 1–25.Google Scholar
Maidment, Brian. “Graphic Satire, Caricature, Comic Illustration, and the Radical Press, 1820–1845.” In Journalism and the Periodical Press in Nineteenth-Century Britain, edited by Shattock, Joanne, 84–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maidment, Brian. Robert Seymour and Nineteenth-Century Print Culture. New York: Routledge, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Stephen. “Language into Structure: Pickwick Revisited.” Daedalus 101, no. 1 (1972): 183–202.Google Scholar
Marriott, John, ed. Unknown London: Early Modernist Visions of the Metropolis. New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Menke, Richard. Literature, Print and Media Technologies, 1880–1900: Many Inventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, Nancy Aycock. “The Madman's Curious Manuscript, or, ‘Judge for yourself,’ Samuel Pickwick.” Dickens Quarterly 36, no. 2 (2019): 125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. “Sam Weller's Valentine.” In Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-century British Publishing and Reading Practices, edited by Jordan, John O. and Patten, Robert L., 93–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth. “Reading in Review: The Victorian Book Review in the New Media Moment.” Victorian Periodicals Review 49, no. 4 (2016): 626–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Robert L. “Serialized Retrospection in The Pickwick Papers.” In Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-century British Publishing and Reading Practices, edited by Jordan, John O. and Patten, Robert L., 123–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Patten, Robert L. “The Audience Widens.” In Dickens and Victorian Print Cultures, edited by Patten, Robert L., 209–27. Burlington: Ashgate, 2012.Google Scholar
Patten, Robert L. Charles Dickens and His Publishers. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Peckett Prest, Thomas. The Post-humorous Notes of the Pickwickian Club. London: Edward Lloyd, 1837–39.Google Scholar
Peltz, Lucy. Facing the Text: Extra-Illustration, Print Culture, and Society in Britain, 1769–1840. San Merino: Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens and the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, 2017.Google Scholar
Pettitt, Claire. Serial Forms: The Unfinished Project of Modernity, 1815–1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, Victor, and Berman, David Elliot. After Net Neutrality: A New Deal for the Digital Age. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Podeschi, John. Dickens and Dickensiana: A Catalogue of the Gimbel Dickens Collection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. “The Man-of-Letters Hero: David Copperfield and the Professional Writer.” In Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England, 89–125. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Leah. How to Do Things with Books in Victorian Britain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Reinhold, Heinz. “‘The Stroller's Tale’ in Pickwick.” Dickensian 64, no. 356 (1968): 141–51.Google Scholar
“Sam Weller's Scrap Sheet: Containing all the Pickwick Portraits, with the Poetical Effusions of Augustus Snodgrass, Esq., M.P.C.” London: John Cleave, ca. 1837.Google Scholar
“Sam Weller to the Satirist.” Cleave's Penny Gazette of Variety 1, no. 27, April 14, 1838.Google Scholar
Shannon, Mary L. Dickens, Reynolds, and Mayhew on Wellington Street: The Print Culture of a Victorian Street. Surrey: Ashgate, 2015.Google Scholar
Small, Helen. “A Pulse of 124: Charles Dickens and a Pathology of the Mid-Victorian Reading Public.” In The Practice and Representation of Reading in England, edited by Raven, James, Small, Helen, and Tadmor, Naomi, 263–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Starkowski, Kristen. “‘Our Delectable Works’: Characterological Novelty in Penny ‘Plagiarism’ of Oliver Twist.” Victorian Review 45, no. 2 (2019): 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surridge, Lisa, and Leighton, Mary Elizabeth. The Plot Thickens: Illustrated Serial Fiction from Dickens to Du Maurier. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Sutherland, John. “Dickens's Serializing Imitators.” Victorian Fiction: Writers, Publishers, Readers, 87–106. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teukolsky, Rachel. Picture World: Image, Aesthetics, and Victorian New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Tevel, Amir. “Counter-Didactic Pickwickians.” Dickens Studies Annual 50, no. 2 (2019): 207–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, William. “Half-a-Crown's Worth of Cheap Knowledge.” Fraser's Magazine, March 1838, 279–90.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark W. “Companions, Supplements, and the Proliferation of Print in the 1830s.” Victorian Periodicals Review 43, no. 2 (2010): 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valint, Alexandra. Narrative Bonds: Multiple Narrators in the Victorian Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargo, Gregory. An Underground History of Early Victorian Fiction: Chartism, Radical Print Culture, and the Social Problem Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warhol, Robyn. “Seriality.” Victorian Literature Culture 46, nos. 3–4 (2018): 873–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Andy. “Advertising and Fiction in The Pickwick Papers.” Victorian Literature and Culture 38, no. 2 (2010): 319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar