Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-wjqwx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T12:47:57.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Case Report of Holistic Review of Graduate Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2022

Heather Stoll Open the ORCID record for Heather Stoll [Opens in a new window]  and
Bruce Bimber
Heather Stoll
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Bruce Bimber
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Structuring Inclusion into the Political Science Student Experience: From Recruitment to Completion, From Undergraduate to Graduate and Beyond
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Political Science Association. 2020. “Project on Women and Minorities Dashboard (P-WAM).” Dataset generated February 2020. https://apsanet.org/resources/data-on-the-profession/dashboards/p-wam.Google Scholar
Kent, Julia D., and McCarthy, Maureen T.. 2016. “Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions: A Report from the Council of Graduate Schools.” Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Bruce, John M., and Gilligan, Michael. 1993. “The Science of Political Science Graduate Admissions.” PS: Political Science & Politics 26 (4): 772–78.Google Scholar
Kuncel, Nathan R., and Hezlett, Sarah A.. 2010. “Fact and Fiction in Cognitive Ability Testing for Admissions and Hiring Decisions.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 19 (6): 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Casey, and Stassun, Keivan. 2014. “A Test That Fails: A Standard Test for Admission to Graduate School Misses Potential Winners.” Nature 510:303–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Casey, Zwickl, Benjamin M., Posselt, Julie R., Silvestrini, Rachel T., and Hodapp, Theodore. 2019. “Typical Physics Ph.D. Admissions Criteria Limit Access to Underrepresented Groups but Fail to Predict Doctoral Completion.” Science Advances 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat7550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posselt, Julie R. 2013. “Towards Inclusive Excellence in Graduate Education: Constructing Merit and Diversity in Ph.D. Admissions.” Journal of Higher Education 120 (4): 481–514.Google Scholar
Posselt, Julie R., Hernandez, Theresa E., Villareal, Cynthia D., Rodgers, Aireale J., and Irwin, Lauren N.. 2020. “Evaluation and Decision Making in Higher Education: Toward Equitable Repertoires of Faculty Practice.” Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research 31:1–63.Google Scholar
Stassun, Keivan G., Sturm, Susan, Holley-Bockelmann, Kelley, Burger, Arnold, Ernst, David J., and Webb, Donna. 2011. “The Fisk–Vanderbilt Master’s-to-PhD Bridge Program: Recognizing, Enlisting, and Cultivating Unrealized or Unrecognized Potential in Underrepresented Minority Students.” American Journal of Physics 79:374–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, Robert J., and Williams, Wendy M.. 1997. “Does the Graduate Record Examination Predict Meaningful Success in the Graduate Training of Psychologists? A Case Study.” American Psychologist 52 (6): 630–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Marenda A., Odem, Max A., Walters, Taylor, DePass, Anthony L., and Bean, Andrew J.. 2019. “A Model for Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions That Decouples the GRE from Race, Ethnicity, and Gender.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 18 (1): ar7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar