Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:28:56.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying a One Health lens to understanding the impact of climate and environmental change on healthcare-associated infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2023

Sabrina B. Graham
Affiliation:
Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, New York
Catherine Machalaba
Affiliation:
EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York
Sarah E. Baum
Affiliation:
EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York
Jill Raufman
Affiliation:
Global Health Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Sarah E. Hill*
Affiliation:
Global Health Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
*
Author for correspondence: Sarah E. Hill, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

Abstract

The pace and trajectory of global and local environmental changes are jeopardizing our health in numerous ways, among them exacerbating the risk of disease emergence and spread in both the community and the healthcare setting via healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Factors such as climate change, widespread land alteration, and biodiversity loss underlie changing human–animal–environment interactions that drive disease vectors, pathogen spillover, and cross-species transmission of zoonoses. Climate change–associated extreme weather events also threaten critical healthcare infrastructure, infection prevention and control (IPC) efforts, and treatment continuity, adding to stress to strained systems and creating new areas of vulnerability. These dynamics increase the likelihood of developing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), vulnerability to HAIs, and high-consequence hospital-based disease transmission. Using a One Health approach to both human and animal health systems, we can become climate smart by re-examining impacts on and relationships with the environment. We can then work collaboratively to reduce and respond to the growing threat and burden of infectious diseases.

Type
Commentary
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Healthy, functioning ecosystems are essential to sustaining human health and survival. The current trajectory of anthropogenic environmental change puts our health at risk: widespread land alteration, biodiversity loss, pollution, and climate change. Reference Watts, Amann and Arnell1 One way these changes affect our health is by exacerbating the risk of disease outbreaks as well as the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens in healthcare settings resulting in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Reference Haque, Sartelli, McKimm and Abu Bakar2 It is crucial to define the effects of environmental change on increasing HAIs in order to propose solutions for reducing the threat of these diseases.

Direct environmental drivers of HAI

The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic and vectorborne diseases can occur via pathogen spillover between animals and humans. Reference Vora, Hannah, Lieberman, Vale, Plowright and Bernstein3 Environmental change occurs as the result of actions such as deforestation and urbanization, in which human–animal–environment interactions can result in disease outbreaks. Cross-species transmission of zoonoses can increase the incidence of HAI when human–human spread occurs. There are ∼2 billion cases of zoonotic disease annually, resulting in >2 million deaths, and >700,000 global deaths each year are due to vectorborne diseases. Reference Karesh, Dobson and Lloyd-Smith4 Both zoonotic and vectorborne diseases have led to recent epidemics and pandemics such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Ebola virus, plague, COVID-19, and Zika virus. Environmental contamination has also been linked to antibiotic use in healthcare and food production and to drug-resistant infections. Healthcare facilities are opportune sites for these outbreaks to spread, particularly in the absence of sufficient infection prevention and control (IPC) infrastructure.

Drastically shifting temperatures and weather patterns are examples of climate change that can create more favorable conditions for the expansion of vectors such as mosquitoes. Malaria and dengue are recognized as climate-sensitive diseases with increasing distribution and incidence in tropical climates. Further, many tropical regions may have fewer economic resources to support a robust healthcare infrastructure, which can lead to greater vulnerability for transmission in healthcare facilities. Reference Campbell-Lendrum, Manga, Bagayoko and Sommerfeld5 A rise in malaria can increase HAI risk through organ and tissue transplantation from infected donors in susceptible healthcare facilities. Reference Pierrotti, Levi, Di Santi, Segurado and Petersen6 The wealthiest nations are disproportionately responsible for producing carbon emissions, yet the poorest countries face the greatest burdens of climate change. Reference Gore7 A health-equity perspective is crucial for understanding and addressing the consequences of climate change.

Pathogen spillover occurs when there is direct transmission between animals and people in regions where it may or may not have occurred previously. Reference Carlson, Albery and Merow8 Intensification of agriculture, expansion of animals and livestock into previously untouched natural areas, and urbanization are shaping human–animal–environment interactions and increasing the likelihood of pathogen spillover. These human-driven behaviors contribute to environmental degradation that increases the risk of not only disease emergence but also potential outbreaks. Farmers, veterinarians, and others who interact with animals are particularly at risk where biosecurity practices and protocols are weak. Zoonotic pathogens of high concern, such as Nipah, Lassa fever, and coronaviruses, all have epidemic potential and the risk for high-consequence illness in humans via nosocomial transmission. Nipah virus may be transmitted to humans that have close contact with animals such as fruit bats, pigs, and horses. Those who are occupationally or otherwise exposed to these animals may be at higher risk for infection. Reference Alam9 Subsequently, those who become infected may seek care in a traditional healthcare setting, where they may introduce highly infectious pathogens into healthcare facilities. Other patients in these settings then become vulnerable to these pathogens and other secondary HAIs. Human behaviors that degrade the environment drive a chain of events and consequences that can result in increased HAIs.

Indirect environmental drivers of HAI

Flooding and extreme weather events are further consequences of climate change that result in damage to critical healthcare infrastructure. These natural disasters interrupt reliable access to and provision of care and IPC measures. Extensive flooding can jeopardize sanitation protocols and lead to hospital contamination, which was observed during Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans where methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Salmonella infections increased. 10

Environmental changes, including increasing global temperatures, can also increase the prevalence of infections, which may result in greater strain on healthcare systems. In the summers of 2021 and 2022, heat waves across the globe exacerbated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. High healthcare utilizers and vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and chronically ill, were dually at risk of heat-related health problems and COVID-19 in healthcare settings. Additionally, healthcare workers required to wear personal protective equipment were at a greater risk for heat-related illnesses. Reference Bose-O’Reilly, Daanen and Deering11 Rising temperatures are a major component of climate change that adds pressure to healthcare facilities not only to contend with the exacerbation of patients’ underlying conditions but also to protect patients and staff from the direct consequences of extreme temperatures.

One Health solutions

One Health proposes a collaborative approach to harness information, expertise, and resources across sectors to better understand and address risks and impacts to human, animal, and environmental health (Box 1). A One Health approach can strengthen health security by improving our ability to monitor pathogens across species, detect and address changes to our ecosystems and behavioral practices to reduce the risks of pathogen spillover and disease emergence, and build comprehensive early warning and outbreak response systems.

Box 1.

One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals, and ecosystems. It recognizes the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and interdependent. The approach mobilizes multiple sectors, disciplines, and communities at varying levels of society to work together to foster well-being and tackle threats to health and ecosystems, while addressing the collective need for clean water, energy and air, safe and nutritious food, taking action on climate change, and contributing to sustainable development.

Working definition endorsed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, United Nations Environment Programme, World Health Organization, and World Organisation for Animal Health.

IPC at healthcare facilities is critical to limiting the spread of infections in human populations, yet IPC strategies are often poorly resourced and operationalized. In low- and middle-income countries, an estimated 15% of patients acquire HAIs in the process of receiving care. Reference Allegranzi, Bagheri Nejad and Combescure12 With the growing AMR crisis, poor IPC puts everyone at risk.

Using a One Health approach, our health systems can become climate smart by re-examining their impact on and relationship with the environment around them. We must design healthcare infrastructure and systems that are resilient against natural disasters, and we must recognize and take action against our own role in contributing to climate change. Investments must also be made to increase the capacity of our healthcare workforce to efficiently manage zoonotic and vectorborne diseases. Reference Bouley, Roschnik and Karliner13

Humans represent just one side of the One Health triad, yet our choices also shape animal and ecosystem health outcomes. The healthcare sector is essential to sustaining human health, yet it contributes to anywhere from 1% to 5% of the global environmental footprint. Reference Lenzen, Malik and Li14 Healthcare professionals have a vital role to play in calling attention to and addressing the urgent threat posed by human-driven environmental degradation. This can be accomplished in several ways:

  • Consider animal and environmental exposures when investigating an illness.

  • Recognize the impact of long-term and acute environmental changes on disease dynamics.

  • Participate in primary prevention of pathogen spillover by empowering individuals and communities to engage in disease risk reduction practices.

  • Advocate and take action to address the inequities and vulnerabilities that underlie health disparities and impede our ability to adapt to growing environmental challenges.

  • Innovate change in the healthcare system to reduce our contribution to environmental impacts.

  • Expand healthcare investments in resources and programs needed to protect animal and environmental health.

These applications of the One Health approach can help us address the climate and environmentally driven expansion of global disease threats. These actions will require us to take a multifaceted approach to addressing the expansion of infectious diseases, including HAIs, and to build stronger, more secure, and more equitable healthcare systems.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Watts, N, Amann, M, Arnell, N, et al. The 2020 report of the Lancet countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises. Lancet 2021;397:129170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haque, M, Sartelli, M, McKimm, J, Abu Bakar, M. Healthcare-associated infections—an overview. Infect Drug Resist 2018;11:23212333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vora, NM, Hannah, L, Lieberman, S, Vale, MM, Plowright, RK, Bernstein, AS. Want to prevent pandemics? Stop spillovers. Nature 2022;605:419422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karesh, WB, Dobson, A, Lloyd-Smith, JO, et al. Ecology of zoonoses: natural and unnatural histories. Lancet 2012;380:19361945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell-Lendrum, D, Manga, L, Bagayoko, M, Sommerfeld, J. Climate change and vector-borne diseases: what are the implications for public health research and policy? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2015;370(1665):20130552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierrotti, LC, Levi, ME, Di Santi, SM, Segurado, AC, Petersen, E. Malaria disease recommendations for solid organ transplant recipients and donors. Transplantation 2018;102 suppl 2:S16S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, T. Confronting Carbon Inequality: Putting Climate Justice at the Heart of the COVID-19 Recovery. New York: OXFAM International; 2020.Google Scholar
Carlson, CJ, Albery, GF, Merow, C, et al. Climate change increases cross-species viral transmission risk. Nature 2022;607:555562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alam, AM. Nipah virus, an emerging zoonotic disease causing fatal encephalitis. Clin Med 2022;22:348352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infectious disease and dermatologic conditions in evacuees and rescue workers after Hurricane Katrina—multiple states, August–September, 2005. JAMA 2005;294:2158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose-O’Reilly, S, Daanen, H, Deering, K, et al. COVID-19 and heat waves: new challenges for healthcare systems. Environ Res 2021;198:111153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allegranzi, B, Bagheri Nejad, S, Combescure, C, et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011;377:228241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouley, T, Roschnik, S, Karliner, J, et al. Climate-Smart Healthcare: Low-Carbon and Resilience Strategies for the Health Sector (English). Investing in Climate Change and Health Series. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2017.Google Scholar
Lenzen, M, Malik, A, Li, M, et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health 2020;4:e271e279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed