Nocturnal enuresis or bed-wetting is one of the lesser known side-effects of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine. Although case reports have been published since the 1990s, Reference Frankenburg, Kando, Centorrino and Gilbert1–Reference Lee and Kim3 the proportion of patients taking clozapine who experience nocturnal enuresis has not been accurately established, with previous estimates ranging from less than 1% Reference Aronowitz, Safferman and Lieberman4 to as high as 42%. Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5 There have also been published case reports of enuresis with risperidone Reference Agarwal6,Reference Kantrowitz, Srihari and Tek7 and urinary incontinence with olanzapine, Reference Vernon, Fuller, Hattab and Varnes8 but there have been no studies specifically designed to compare rates of nocturnal enuresis in patients taking atypical antipsychotic medicines.
During the monitoring of four atypical antipsychotics in New Zealand, the Intensive Medicines Monitoring Programme (IMMP) received several reports of nocturnal enuresis associated with clozapine. Assessment of these cases suggested a strong causal relationship, but it was not possible to determine an incidence rate from these spontaneous reports. Bed-wetting is likely to be underdetected by routine post-marketing pharmacovigilance methods, as has been demonstrated in clinical studies. Reference Yusufi, Mukherjee, Flanagan, Paton, Dunn and Page9 Therefore, a cohort study was designed using intensive follow-up to determine more accurately the rates of nocturnal enuresis in patients taking clozapine and other atypical antipsychotics.
Method
The methods used by the IMMP to perform post-marketing safety studies have been described in detail previously. Reference Harrison-Woolrych, Coulter, Mann and Andrews10 Essentially, cohort studies of selected medicines are conducted using prescription event monitoring in which cohorts of patients prescribed monitored medicines are established directly from pharmacy dispensing data. Adverse clinical events are subsequently identified from follow-up questionnaires sent to patients’ doctors. These methods were adapted to perform this study of nocturnal enuresis in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics.
Establishing the study cohort
Prescription data for the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine were returned from pharmacies throughout New Zealand directly to the IMMP in the usual way. Reference Harrison-Woolrych, Coulter, Mann and Andrews10 For this enuresis study, the cohort was established from dispensing data from one urban district (Dunedin, in the South Island of New Zealand) in order to facilitate the intensive follow-up required. Data were entered for all Dunedin patients dispensed clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine between 1 August and 30 November 2004. Information collected from the dispensing data included patient details, information regarding atypical antipsychotics dispensed during this period and details of the prescribing doctor. Patients without an identifiable doctor or who had died during the period between prescription and follow-up were excluded from the final cohort. Patients aged less than 15 years or greater than 64 years were also excluded, as childhood enuresis and incontinence in the elderly could affect the results.
Questionnaire design
The follow-up questionnaire for this study was based on the routine IMMP questionnaire, on which doctors are asked to report all new clinical events for an individual since starting treatment. Reference Harrison-Woolrych, Coulter, Mann and Andrews10 The IMMP questionnaire also asks whether treatment continues or the date and reason for stopping. For this study, questions about the indication for use of the atypical antipsychotic, the date treatment started, the dose once stabilised, and concomitant medications were also included. Four additional questions specifically enquired about nocturnal enuresis (including childhood enuresis) and a further question enquired about leakage of urine during the day (to assist in distinguishing nocturnal enuresis from other types of incontinence). In the covering letter on the front of the questionnaire, we requested that practitioners ask their patients the urinary/enuresis questions directly wherever possible.
Follow-up procedure
Follow-up questionnaires were given to doctors in November 2005. Those for psychiatrists or mental health nurses to complete were hand-delivered by researchers to encourage participation. Questionnaires were posted or delivered to general practitioners, with researchers again making personal contact whenever possible. If the doctor identified was not able to complete the questionnaire for a particular patient, they were asked to suggest an alternative practitioner to whom the IMMP could forward the questionnaire.
Clinical assessment
All questionnaires returned with clinical information were assessed by medically qualified staff at the IMMP. Adverse events reported were coded using terms from a specialised dictionary based on World Health Organization Adverse Reaction Terminology Reference Edwards, Biriell, Mann and Andrews11 and causality assessment was performed to determine the relationship with the medicine. Reference Karch and Lasagna12 Urinary adverse events identified from the five additional questions were coded according to the above principles. A specific standard operating procedure was developed for coding urinary events in this study, in order to distinguish pre-existing urinary problems from new events since starting the medicine.
Analyses
Rates of nocturnal enuresis for each medicine were calculated using the number of ‘new’ cases (i.e. enuresis since starting the medicine) as the numerator and the population for whom a follow-up questionnaire was returned to the IMMP (the ‘responder population’) as the denominator. Patients identified as having nocturnal incontinence before starting the antipsychotic were excluded from these analyses. Confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated around the estimates and comparisons between medicines were made by calculating odds ratios (ORs), with clozapine as the reference medicine. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the ORs and 95% CIs and to adjust the estimates for the effects of the antipsychotic medicines on nocturnal enuresis according to age, gender and duration of treatment. Nothing else has been consistently related to nocturnal enuresis. These models accounted for the fact that some patients were in the data-set twice, because they took more than one
Mean age a Years | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | Number of patients | Proportion of study cohort, % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clozapine | 39.1 | 55 (60) | 36 (40) | 91 | 14.2 |
Olanzapine | 39.8 | 98 (68) | 47 (32) | 145 | 22.5 |
Quetiapine | 40.0 | 55 (40) | 82 (60) | 137 | 21.3 |
Risperidone | 41.5 | 137 (51) | 133 (49) | 270 | 42.0 |
Total | 345 | 298 | 643 b | 100 |
a Mean age at time of first prescription during the study period.
b Of 606 patients, 37 received more than one atypical antipsychotic in the cohort period: 36 of these were sent two questionnaires and 1 further patient was identified later as having had two atypical antipsychotics in the cohort period.
antipsychotic (either concomitantly or consecutively) during the study period.
To identify potential risk factors for bed-wetting while taking an antipsychotic, analyses were performed to compare patients with new enuresis since starting the medicine with those patients who did not experience bed-wetting. For these analyses, the ‘non-bed-wetting’ group was defined as those patients in the responder population who did not answer ‘yes’ to a question asking whether bed-wetting had occurred while taking the medicine. This group also excluded all patients identified as having incontinence which pre-dated the atypical antipsychotic prescription. The patient group defined as having had childhood enuresis only included patients who had responded ‘yes’ to this question.
Ethical approval
The IMMP is a long-standing national medicines surveillance programme and its processes and practices have been approved by the New Zealand Privacy Commissioner. This study was carried out under the existing and ongoing IMMP ethical approval granted by the Otago Ethics Committee (reference OTA/04/32/CPD).
Results
Between 1 August and 30 November 2004, 979 patients were prescribed clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone or quetiapine. Of these, 881 patients had identifying information available, including date of birth. There were 612 patients aged 15–64 years at the time of first prescription in this period. Six patients were excluded – two patients had no identifiable doctor and four patients had died – and therefore the total study cohort consisted of 606 patients: 327 (54%) were male and 279 (46%) were female.
Table 1 shows the patient characteristics in each medicine group. Risperidone was the most frequently prescribed antipsychotic, with 42% of the study population receiving a prescription. Similar proportions of patients received prescriptions for olanzapine and quetiapine (22.5% and 21.3% respectively), and about 14% of the cohort received a prescription for clozapine (Table 1).
The indication for use of an antipsychotic was reported for 366 patients (60% of cohort, 72% of questionnaires returned), with 310 patients having one indication reported and 56 having two. A summary of the first reported indications for these 366 patients is shown in Table 2. The most frequently reported diagnoses were schizophrenia and related disorders (63% of first indications reported), with mood disorders representing about a fifth (21%) of the indications reported.
A total of 642 questionnaires were sent out for 606 patients in the study cohort, with 36 patients completing two questionnaires (for two different antipsychotics prescribed during the study
ICD-10 codes | Reports n | Proportion a % | |
---|---|---|---|
Schizophrenia and related disorders | F20.0–29.0 | 231 | 63 |
Schizophrenia | 161 | ||
Schizoaffective disorder | 22 | ||
Unspecified psychosis | 36 | ||
Persistent delusional disorder | 12 | ||
Mood (affective) disorders | F30.0–39.0 | 77 | 21 |
Bipolar affective disorder | 42 | ||
Mania/hypomania | 2 | ||
Depression | 26 | ||
Unspecified affective disorder | 7 | ||
Neurotic disorders | F40.0–48.0 | 20 | 5 |
Anxiety disorders | 8 | ||
Post-traumatic stress disorder | 8 | ||
Obsessive–compulsive disorders | 3 | ||
Somatisation disorder | 1 | ||
Personality disorders | F60.0–69.0 | 10 | 3 |
Mental retardation | F70.0–79.0 | 9 | 2.5 |
Organic mental disorder | F00–F09 | 3 | 1.0 |
Pervasive development disorders | F80.0–F89.0 | 9 | 2.5 |
Conduct disorders | F91.1–91.9 | 3 | 1.0 |
Other disorders | F50–59 | 4 | 1.0 |
Non-organic sleep disorder | 2 | ||
Puerpural mental disorder | 1 | ||
Tardive dyskinesia b | 1 | ||
Total | 366 | 100 |
a Proportion of 366 first indications reported.
b Interpreted as the patient experienced tardive dyskinesia on a previous antipsychotic medicine, as this is not a recognised indication for these medicines.
period). A final total of 508 questionnaires were received by the IMMP, giving an overall response rate of 79%. The response rates for each medicine were: clozapine 92%, olanzapine 80%, quetiapine 77% and risperidone 75%.
Risk of nocturnal enuresis
A total of 52 patients reported bed-wetting while taking an antipsychotic. Of these patients, 11 were assessed as having nocturnal incontinence which pre-dated the antipsychotic and these patients were excluded from further analyses. Most were patients with intellectual disability who had continual (day and night) incontinence. The remaining 41 patients had experienced nocturnal enuresis since starting the atypical antipsychotic. Of these, six experienced enuresis with two antipsychotics.
Occurrence rates of nocturnal enuresis for each medicine are shown in Table 3. The six patients who experienced nocturnal enuresis while taking more than one antipsychotic were included in more than one medicine group. Patients taking olanzapine,
Number with enuresis a | Percentage with enuresis (95% CI) | Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio b (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clozapine (n = 82) c | 17 | 20.7 (12.6–31.1) | 1 (reference) | 1 (reference) |
Olanzapine (n = 115) c | 11 | 9.6 (4.9–16.5) | 0.41 (0.19–0.91) | 0.43 (0.19–0.96) |
Quetiapine (n = 105) c | 7 | 6.7 (2.7–13.3) | 0.28 (0.11–0.72) | 0.33 (0.13–0.59) |
Risperidone (n = 195) c | 12 | 6.2 (3.2–10.5) | 0.25 (0.12–0.53) | 0.27 (0.12–0.59) |
a Patients reporting bed-wetting since starting the atypical antipsychotic medicine.
b Adjusted for age, gender and duration on medicine.
c Population excludes patients with incontinence pre-dating the antipsychotic medicine.
quetiapine or risperidone had a significantly lower risk of nocturnal enuresis compared with patients taking clozapine (Table 3). Further testing showed that the risks of nocturnal enuresis for olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone were not significantly different from each other. Adjustment for age, gender and duration of treatment resulted in only minor changes in the risk estimates (Table 3).
The question ‘How often has the bed-wetting occurred while taking the medicine?’ was answered by 37 (90%) of the 41 patients with nocturnal enuresis since starting the atypical antipsychotic. Of these patients, 7 (19%) reported experiencing nocturnal enuresis only once, 6 (16%) twice and 24 (65%) responded that it had occurred on multiple occasions.
Risk factors for enuresis
Of the 41 patients who experienced nocturnal enuresis, 10 (24%) had received a prescription for a second atypical antipsychotic during the study period. Of 432 patients in the responder population who did not experience enuresis, only 18 (4%) patients received a prescription for a second antipsychotic during the study period. This difference was highly significant (P<0.0005).
A history of childhood enuresis was reported by 116 (27%) of the 434 patients who responded to the question about this. In the nocturnal enuresis group (47 responses), 20 (43%) reported having experienced childhood bed-wetting. Of the 450 responses from patients who did not have enuresis during treatment, only 90 (20%) reported childhood enuresis. This difference was significant (P = 0.009). The results of further analyses for each individual medicine are shown in Table 4.
Of the 508 responses received in this study, 380 (75%) stated that the patient was taking other prescribed medicines. For patients taking clozapine, the number of concomitant medicines ranged from 1 to 8, for olanzapine from 1 to 9, for quetiapine from 1 to 10 (with one other patient on 20 concomitant medicines) and for risperidone from 1 to 13 medicines. The majority (71%) of concomitant medicines reported were central nervous system (CNS) medicines (Anatomical Therapeutic Classification group N (www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index)). In the clozapine group, 62% (of those for whom a questionnaire was completed) were also taking other CNS medicines. For olanzapine and quetiapine, 70% of each patient group was also taking other CNS medicines and for risperidone the figure was 69%. The differences between the proportions of patients in each group also taking other CNS medicines were not statistically significant (P = 0.705).
Discussion
The key finding of this study was that approximately one in five patients between 15 and 64 years of age taking clozapine experienced
Clozapine | Olanzapine | Quetiapine | Risperidone | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New enuresis | No enuresis | OR a (95% CI) | New enuresis | No enuresis | OR a (95% CI) | New enuresis | No enuresis | OR a (95% CI) | New enuresis | No enuresis | OR a (95% CI) | |
Childhood enuresis, n | 6 | 17 | 1.52 (0.44–5.38) | 4 | 25 | 1.53 (0.38–6.10) | 3 | 18 | 4.05 0.56–29.20) | 7 | 30 | 6.19 (1.61–23.88) |
Without childhood enuresis, n | 8 | 40 | 6 | 55 | 4 | 57 | 5 | 153 |
a Odds ratio for having new enuresis among patients with a history of childhood enuresis compared with those without childhood enuresis taking the same medicine, and adjusted for gender, age and duration on medicine.
bed-wetting while taking this medicine. This estimate was significantly higher than the risk of nocturnal enuresis reported with the other antipsychotics included in this study. Adjustment for age, gender and duration of treatment did not change these results. The occurrence of bed-wetting reported with risperidone (6.2%), olanzapine (9.6%) and quetiapine (6.7%) were all higher than the background occurrence of nocturnal enuresis in non-institutionalised adults, which has been estimated at 0.5%. Reference Hirasing, van Leerdam, Bolk-Bennink and Janknegt13
Previous estimates
Previous estimates of the occurrence of nocturnal enuresis in patients on clozapine have come from various sources. A letter to a journal citing unpublished pharmaceutical company data stated that nocturnal enuresis occurred in less than 1% of individuals taking clozapine. Reference Aronowitz, Safferman and Lieberman4 If the company’s estimate was derived using spontaneous reports as the numerator and clozapine sales data as the denominator, it is likely to be a gross underestimate because enuresis is an underreported adverse event. Reference Yusufi, Mukherjee, Flanagan, Paton, Dunn and Page9 A clinical pharmacology study of 44 patients reported enuresis as a ‘late’ side-effect in 27% of patients taking clozapine, Reference Centorrino, Baldessarini, Kando, Frankenburg, Volpicelli and Flood14 while another study of 57 in-patients treated with clozapine reported that 16 (28%) developed urinary incontinence (type unspecified). Reference Fuller, Borovicka, Jaskiw, Simon, Kwon and Konicki15 The in-patients in the latter study might not be representative of the majority of patients taking atypical antipsychotic medicines, who are now more likely to be treated in the community. Reference Thornicroft and Tansella16
In a more recent study, 103 patients were interviewed about all side-effects during clozapine maintenance treatment and although only 1 patient admitted to bed-wetting on general questioning, direct questioning elicited that 40 (39%) patients had experienced nocturnal enuresis. Reference Yusufi, Mukherjee, Flanagan, Paton, Dunn and Page9 This demonstrates the importance of using a specific questionnaire to ask patients directly about urinary symptoms, as was done in our study. The highest previous estimate of 42% was derived from a small study of patients identified through the UK Clozaril Patient Monitoring Service (CPMS), who were interviewed about their first 3 months of clozapine treatment. Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5 Retrospective assessment identified that 5 of 12 patients included in this study experienced nocturnal incontinence. Interestingly, the enuresis resolved in all five after 3 months despite continuing clozapine treatment.
Strengths and limitations
Our study was not restricted to the first months of treatment and included some patients who had been taking atypical antipsychotic medicines for long periods. It is possible that our population included patients who had experienced initial bed-wetting which had resolved and was not reported. Moreover, some patients who had experienced enuresis might have stopped using clozapine and thus have avoided inclusion in this study. Therefore the rate of 21% calculated in the IMMP study could be an underestimate. However, perhaps more importantly, the small sample size of the CPMS study Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5 and most of the other previous studies means there is a wide degree of uncertainty surrounding earlier estimates.
The results of our intensive monitoring study may more accurately reflect the occurrence of nocturnal enuresis with ‘real-life’ use of atypical antipsychotics compared with risk estimates derived from clinical trials. The patient population in the IMMP study is more generally representative as very few patients were excluded, with cohorts established directly from pharmacy dispensing data. A further strength of this study was the intensive follow-up of patients through their mental healthcare teams, while the high response rate achieved reduced the possible effect of responder bias. As response rates depended on the cooperation of clinicians rather than patients, the higher response rate for the clozapine group was unlikely to be related to differences in the occurrence of enuresis. Clinicians were requested to directly ask patients specific questions relating to nocturnal enuresis and this should have reduced the likelihood of underreporting. It is still possible that some cases of bed-wetting were not identified. However, as there were not likely to be differences in reporting rates of enuresis among the four medicines, this should not have affected the odds ratios.
Our study is the first specifically designed to compare rates of nocturnal enuresis in patients aged 15–64 taking different atypical antipsychotics. Although rates of ‘incontinence/nocturia’ were reported for patients taking olanzapine (1%), risperidone (3%) and quetiapine (4%) in one clinical trial, Reference Stroup, Lieberman, McEvoy, Swartz, Davis and Rosenheck17 this study was primarily designed to determine the effectiveness of these medicines and reporting of all adverse events was a secondary aim. Another randomised controlled trial reported rates of enuresis in adolescent patients with early-onset schizophrenia taking clozapine (56%) or olanzapine (29%). Reference Kumra, Kranzler, Gerbino-Rosen, Kester, DeThomas and Kafantaris18 As with other clinical trials, that study was conducted in a small and select population, the primary aim was to assess efficacy and the study period was relatively short (12 weeks). Our larger IMMP study may more accurately estimate the rates of enuresis in patients taking atypical antipsychotics in ‘real-life’ conditions over a longer time period.
Our study suggests that prescription of a second atypical antipsychotic increased the occurrence of bed-wetting. This finding is not unexpected and concomitant antipsychotic treatment is a recognised issue as some patients may require more than one medicine under certain circumstances. Reference Correll, Rummel-Kluge, Corves, Kane and Leucht19 There was no evidence that prescription of other concomitant CNS medicines could explain the higher rate of enuresis in patients on clozapine in our study, as there was no significant difference in the proportion prescribed a concomitant CNS medicine in each treatment group.
Possible mechanisms
The mechanism by which atypical antipsychotics may cause nocturnal enuresis remains unclear. Reference Fuller, Borovicka, Jaskiw, Simon, Kwon and Konicki15,Reference Kho and Nielsen20 Maintenance of continence involves multiple physiological systems and several of them could be affected by antipsychotics. Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5 Anticholinergic properties could inhibit detrusor contraction, leading to retention of urine with overflow, and anti-adrenergic activity could decrease bladder sphincter tone. Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5 In anaesthetised rats, clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone were noted to alter urodynamics, resulting in reduced activity of the external urethral sphincter. Reference Vera and Nadelhaft21,Reference Vera, Miranda-Sousa and Nadelhaft22 These effects were proposed to involve central actions. Reference Vera, Miranda-Sousa and Nadelhaft22 Non-specific actions of clozapine such as sedation and lowering of the seizure threshold could also contribute. Reference Warner, Harvey and Barnes5,Reference Kho and Nielsen20 Drug-induced diabetes mellitus could result in polyuria, which could lead to nocturnal incontinence Reference Kho and Nielsen20 and there have also been case reports of diabetes insipidus with clozapine. Reference Bendz and Aurell23 Drug-induced diabetes insipidus is generally considered to be nephrogenic. Reference Bendz and Aurell23 A case of polyuria following olanzapine overdose was reported, with laboratory results supporting the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus and with intravenous desmopressin resulting in rapid resolution of the polyuria. Reference Etienne, Wittebole, Liolios and Hantson24 This led the authors to propose a central rather than nephrogenic origin for the diabetes insipidus. Antipsychotic-induced enuresis has been reported to respond to numerous pharmacological strategies. Reference Frankenburg, Kando, Centorrino and Gilbert1,Reference Praharaj and Arora2,Reference Aronowitz, Safferman and Lieberman4,Reference Fuller, Borovicka, Jaskiw, Simon, Kwon and Konicki15 The mechanism may be multifactorial in view of the broad actions of antipsychotics Reference Praharaj and Arora2 and further research is required.
Clinical implications
In summary, this study of the ‘real-life’ use of atypical antipsychotics showed that bed-wetting is relatively common, with about 21% of patients on clozapine (and around 10% of patients on other atypical antipsychotic medicines) likely to suffer this unpleasant and embarrassing adverse effect. Although not life-threatening, nocturnal enuresis may have a profound impact on patients (and their family/carers) and a further consequence may be non-adherence with treatment, with an associated deterioration in quality of life. Reference Safferman, Lieberman, Kane, Szymanski and Kinon25 Mental health practitioners should ask patients directly about bed-wetting in order to identify this and discuss management options. Appropriate risk management need not necessarily involve cessation of the antipsychotic. There have been reports of successful treatment of clozapine-induced enuresis with oxybutynin, Reference Frankenburg, Kando, Centorrino and Gilbert1 amitriptyline, Reference Praharaj and Arora2 desmopressin Reference Aronowitz, Safferman and Lieberman4 and ephedrine. Reference Fuller, Borovicka, Jaskiw, Simon, Kwon and Konicki15 Other management strategies might include dose reduction where possible, or practical measures such as advising patients to limit fluid intake during the evening and to empty their bladder before going to sleep. Increased awareness of bed-wetting as a common side-effect of atypical antipsychotics should lead to improved care of these patients.
Funding
This study was funded by the NZ Ministry of Health (Medsafe) and the University of Otago (IMMP Research Fund).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all the doctors, nurses and other members of the Dunedin mental health teams who helped us gain follow-up information for the patients in this study. We also gratefully acknowledge the patients for their valuable contribution to this work.
Special thanks to Anita Admiraal, Postgraduate Coordinator in the Department of Psychological Medicine for all her assistance. We also acknowledge former IMMP medical assessors, Dr Rachael McLean and Dr Jenny Clifton, who undertook clinical assessments of the follow-up questionnaires, and Lifeng Zhou, who assisted with some of the statistical analyses. Thanks also to the IMMP team, especially Kaylene Crawford and Elizabeth Watson.
All authors of this paper had access to the raw data collected in this study and take full responsibility for the material included in this paper.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.