Introduction
Weeds are one of the major biotic factors in reducing crop yield. In Australia, it is estimated that weeds cause a crop yield loss of around 2.8 billion kg of grain yr−1 and cost grain producers more than AU$3.3 billion yr−1 (Llewellyn et al. Reference Llewellyn, Ronning, Ouzman, Walker, Mayfield and Clarke2016). Vipergrass [Dinebra retroflexa (Vahl) Panzer] is an annual grass belonging to the Poaceae family. The genus Dinebra is closely related to the Leptochloa genus (Snow and Peterson Reference Snow and Peterson2012). Dinebra retroflexa is native to Africa and is widely distributed throughout Asia, Europe, and Australia (CABI 2022; Munirathnam and Kumar Reference Munirathnam and Kumar2014; Nayak and Satapathy Reference Nayak and Satapathy2015). It is a major weed in many field crops, including sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], onion (Allium cepa L.), and rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Babiker and Ahmed Reference Babiker and Ahmed1986; Ghobrial Reference Ghobrial1981; Ibrahim Reference Ibrahim1984; Karar et al. Reference Karar, Mohamed and Marrs2005). In a survey conducted in the cotton region of Australia, this weed was present in 4% of the fields surveyed, indicating the potential for this species to evolve resistance to glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Manalil et al. Reference Manalil, Werth, Jackson, Chauhan and Preston2017).
Dinebra retroflexa is a 15- to 112-cm-tall grass. The ligule is membranous and laciniate at the apex. The inflorescence is composed of many linear racemes, distributed along the floral axis (Anonymous 2022; CABI 2022; Satyamurty Reference Satyamurty1985). Each raceme is composed of 2 to 20 fertile spikelets that are sessile and compressed with 2 or 3 flowers. Dinebra retroflexa is characterized by its reddish anthers and ellipsoid-shaped caryopsis (Anonymous 2022; CABI 2022; Satyamurty Reference Satyamurty1985). It multiplies through seeds, and during the dissemination, the racemes detach themselves completely from the floral axis (Tanji Reference Tanji2020). Knowledge of the physiological response of weeds to the environment is important to understand how they interact with crops under field conditions (Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2010). Studies related to weeds’ interactions with different environmental factors help in managing weeds. For example, if a weed species needs light to germinate, then creating dark conditions with residue or mulch can help in reducing the weed seedbank.
Germination is the initial phase in the life cycle of any plant. Temperature is one of the most important abiotic factors having a direct impact on physiological and metabolic processes by affecting moisture uptake and thus altering the germination behavior (Bewley et al. Reference Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst, Nonogaki, Bewley, Bradford, Hilhorst and Nonogaki2013). Along with temperature, other environmental factors such as light, moisture, and soil salinity can influence the germination of many weed species (Mahajan and Chauhan Reference Mahajan and Chauhan2020; Mahajan et al. Reference Mahajan, Matloob, Walsh and Chauhan2018; Singh et al. Reference Singh, Mahajan, Singh and Chauhan2021). Seed burial depth and crop residue on the soil surface could affect weed seedling emergence (Mahajan et al. Reference Mahajan, Prasad and Chauhan2021). Chauhan and Johnson (Reference Chauhan and Johnson2008) found that seedling emergence of goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.] was highest (82%) for seeds placed on the soil surface, but decreased exponentially with an increasing burial depth, and no seedlings emerged from a burial depth of 8 cm.
In Australia, about 3% of the total soil area is affected by salinity, which reduces the productivity of crops and pastures grown on those soils (Bot et al. Reference Bot, Nachtergaele and Young2000). This study provides information regarding the spread of D. retroflexa under saline soil conditions. A better understanding of the effect of environmental factors on the seed germination of D. retroflexa will help in devising the best management practices for its control. Limited literature is available on the germination behavior of D. retroflexa under different environmental regimes. However, in Sudan, Hamada et al. (Reference Hamada, Koch, Hamdoun, Kunisch and Sauerborn1993) studied the effect of temperature, light, and drought on the germination of several weed species, including D. retroflexa, but information on the effect of salinity stress, burial depth, and residue retention on D. retroflexa germination/emergence is lacking. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of alternating day/night temperature, light, salt stress, water stress, burial depth, and residue retention on seed germination and seedling emergence of D. retroflexa.
Herbicides are an important tool in many integrated weed management (IWM) programs. Very limited information is available on pre- and postemergence herbicide options to control D. retroflexa. This study also evaluated the response of D. retroflexa to commonly used pre- and postemergence herbicides. Information on effective herbicides can be used to control existing infestations of D. retroflexa.
Materials and Methods
Seed Collection
Seeds used in this study were originally collected from Gatton Farms, University of Queensland, Australia, in April 2021 (GPS coordinates: 27.3245°S, 152.1944°E). Seeds were collected from 50 to 60 randomly selected plants. After collection, seeds were stored in paper bags at room temperature (25 C) until the germination test.
General Protocol
All germination experiments were conducted in the weed science laboratory of the Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) at the University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia. Petri dishes (Rowe Scientific Pty Ltd, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; 9-cm diameter) containing a bilayer of Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Whatman International Ltd., Maidstone, Kent, UK) were used for all germination experiments. About 98% of seeds germinated in a preliminary test, and the “seed pressing technique” showed that the rest of the seeds were viable. Before placement of seeds, filter papers were moistened using 5 ml deionized water, polyethylene glycol (PEG), or sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions with the aid of a micropipette (BOECO, Hamburg, Germany). Germination tests were performed by placing 25 seeds evenly in a petri dish with a pair of forceps and a desk magnifying lamp. Uniformly sized seeds were selected, and diseased, damaged, and unevenly shaped seeds were discarded.
All petri dishes were kept in plastic ziplock bags to minimize evaporation losses, and the bags were placed under temperature- and light intensity–controlled incubators (Labec Laboratory, Sydney, NSW, Australia). A white light with an intensity of 85 mol m−2 s−1 was provided by fluorescent lamps (Ultralamp ECO-T5, Cabramatta, NSW, Australia) installed inside the incubator. Except for the temperature experiment, all other experiments in the incubator were configured at a temperature range of 30/20 C and an alternating photoperiod of 12-h/12-h light and dark. This temperature range was found to be the optimum temperature regime, and no further germination was observed after 42 d at this temperature regime (30/20 C) in the temperature experiment. Therefore, all experiments were terminated after 42 d, except the temperature experiment, which ran for 70 d.
Experiment 1. Effect of Temperature on Germination
Incubators were calibrated to five different day/night temperature regimes, that is, 15/5, 20/10, 25/15, 30/20, and 35/25 C, with 12-h-light and 12-h-dark environments. Petri dishes with seeds of D. retroflexa were placed in the incubator maintained at the five alternating day/night temperature regimes, and the effect on D. retroflexa germination was evaluated. The selected five temperature treatments represent the prevailing temperature conditions in Australia during different cropping seasons. Germination was assessed after every 7 d for 70 d.
Experiment 2. Effect of Light on Germination
Dinebra retroflexa seeds were exposed to alternating light (12-h light/12-h dark) and dark (24-h dark) environments to evaluate the effect of different photoperiods on seed germination. The light photoperiod in the incubator coincided with the high temperature (30 C) and the alternative dark photoperiod corresponded with the low temperature (20 C). Petri dishes were wrapped with aluminum foil (trilayer) to achieve completely dark conditions and allowed to incubate for 42 d before assessment of germination data.
Experiment 3. Effect of NaCl on Germination
An experiment to evaluate the effect of salt stress on the germination of D. retroflexa was established using NaCl concentrations of 0, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 mM. The general seed germination protocol was followed for seed incubation, and filter papers were moistened with 5 ml of salt solutions according to the treatments. The required concentrations were prepared using NaCl (Rowe Scientific Pty Ltd) and deionized water. These different concentrations represent the extent of salinity levels in different parts of Australia. Germination was assessed for 42 d at 7-d intervals.
Experiment 4. Effect of Osmotic Potential on Germination
To assess the effect of water potential on germination of D. retroflexa, seeds were placed in the incubator under different water potentials, that is, 0 (control), −0.1, −0.2, −0.4, −0.8, and −1.6 MPa. Solutions of desired osmotic potentials were prepared using PEG 8000 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) following the procedure described by Michel and Radcliffe (Reference Michel and Radcliffe1995). Germination was assessed for 42 d at 7-d intervals.
Experiment 5. Effect of Seed Burial Depth on Emergence
An experiment to study the effect of burial depth on the emergence of D. retroflexa was established using plastic pots (14-cm diameter) filled with the field soil. The soil was collected from Gatton Farms of the University of Queensland and sieved through a 3-mm sieve before pots were filled. The soil texture was clay loam with 35% sand, 38% silt, and 28% clay with 2.7% organic matter. The soil was neutral with a pH of 7.1. A total of 50 seeds per pot were placed either on the soil surface (0-cm depth) or at different soil depths (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 cm). The pots were kept in nonporous plastic trays full of water before being transferred to the incubator. The incubator was calibrated at day/night temperatures of 30/20 C with 12-h light/12-h dark. On every third day, water was added manually to the plastic trays to maintain an optimum level of moisture in the pots. Emergence counts were taken at 7-d intervals for 42 days.
Experiment 6. Effect of Wheat Crop Residue Amount on Emergence
To study the effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop residue amount on the emergence of D. retroflexa, 50 seeds were sown on the surface (0-cm depth) in plastic pots (14-cm diameter). The same soil was used to fill the pots as described earlier. After seed sowing, chopped air-dried wheat (‘Spitfire’) residue was added to the surface at amounts equivalent to 0, 1,000, 2,000, 4,000, and 8,000 kg ha−1. The pots were kept in nonporous plastic trays filled with water before being transferred to the incubator maintained at an alternating day/night temperature of 30/20 C. Throughout the experiment, the soil was kept under moist conditions through the manual addition of water to the plastic trays on every third day. Seedling emergence counts were taken at 7-d intervals for 42.
Experiment 7. Effect of Pre- and Postemergence Herbicides on Survival and Biomass
Treatment details for pre- and postemergence herbicides are given in Table 1. To study the effect of preemergence herbicides, 30 seeds were uniformly planted on the soil surface in pots (14-cm diameter) and then covered with a 0.2-cm layer of soil. The same soil was used to fill the pots as described previously. All preemergence herbicides were sprayed immediately after sowing using a research track sprayer equipped with TeeJet® XR 110015 (TeeJet, Glendale Heights, IL, USA; Sprayshop, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia) flat-fan nozzles calibrated to an output spray volume of 108 L ha−1 and spray pressure of 140 kPa. Pots were kept dry until 24 h after spraying and were watered thereafter using a sprinkler system. A control treatment was included in which no herbicide was sprayed. At 28 d after treatment (DAT), plant survival was recorded and aboveground biomass was harvested for the surviving plants and oven-dried for 72 h at 70 C to determine dry biomass.
Table 1. Treatment details for pre- and postemergence herbicides.
a Nufarm, Australia Ltd, Laverton North, VIC, Australia.
b BASF Australia Ltd, Southbank, VIC, Australia.
To evaluate the efficacy of postemergence herbicides, 12 seeds of D. retroflexa were planted in pots (14-cm diameter). After emergence, thinning was done to maintain 5 plants per pot. Herbicides were sprayed at two stages of D. retroflexa, that is, the 5- to 6- and 11- to 12-leaf stages, using the same research track sprayer as described earlier. At 28 DAT, survival percentage and biomass were recorded as described earlier.
Statistical Analyses
Petri dishes were the experimental units for experiments 1 to 4, while pots were the experimental units for experiments 5 to 7. All experiments were conducted in a randomized complete block design, and each treatment was replicated three times. Each replication was arranged on a different shelf in the incubator and considered a block. Each experiment was repeated over time. No interaction was observed between the experimental runs and treatments in each experiment; therefore, the data from both runs were pooled for further analysis (Genstat 2021). Before analysis, data were visually examined for homogeneity of the variance by plotting residuals (Genstat 2021). Data were analyzed using ANOVA, and graphs were plotted using SigmaPlot v. 14.5 Notebook (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA).
A three-parameter sigmoid model was fit to germination or emergence data obtained at different times (d) in temperature, salt stress, osmotic potential, burial depth, and wheat residue retention experiments. The model was:
$$G = a/{\rm{1}} + {\rm{e}}\left[ { - \left( {x - {T_{{\rm{5}}0}}} \right)/b} \right]$$
where G is cumulative germination (%) at time x, a is maximum germination (%), T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum germination, and b is the slope. An exponential decay model was fit to the final seedling emergence (%) as influenced by different seed burial depths. The model was:
$$E = a*{{\rm{e}}^{ - bD}}$$
where E is emergence (%) at burial depth D, a is the maximum emergence, and b is the slope.
The following linear model was fit to the final emergence (%) obtained at different residue amounts:
$$E = a - bR$$
where E is the emergence (%) at crop residue amount R, a is the maximum emergence, and b is the slope. The fitness of the selected models was determined using R2 values. The parameter estimates were compared using their standard errors. Light and herbicide experiments were analyzed using ANOVA (Genstat 2021). The treatment means were separated using Fisher’s protected LSD test at a 5% level of significance.
Results and Discussion
Experiment 1. Effect of Temperature on Germination
Temperature regimes significantly affected the seed germination of D. retroflexa. The highest germination (98%) was recorded at 30/20 C day/night temperature, and germination decreased at temperatures lower and higher than 30/20 C (Figure 1; Table 2). The germination of D. retroflexa decreased rapidly at lower temperature regimes, and no seeds germinated at 15/5 C. It took 5 d to achieve 50% germination at 30/20 C and 35/25 C, whereas 42 d were required to reach 50% germination at 20/10 C.
Figure 1. Effect of alternating day/night temperature regimes (15/5 to 35/25 C) on germination of Dinebra retroflexa. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means. A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data; parameter estimates are given in Table 2.
Table 2. Effect of alternating day/night temperature regimes (15/5 to 35/25 C) on germination of Dinebra retroflexa. a
a A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination percentage, T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum germination, and b is the slope.
Similar results have been reported in a study conducted in Sudan, where the highest germination of D. retroflexa was found at 30/20 C in alternating 12-h/12-h light and dark conditions (Hamada et al. Reference Hamada, Koch, Hamdoun, Kunisch and Sauerborn1993). Mucronate sprangletop [Leptochloa panicea (Retz.) Ohwi; syn.: Dinebra panicea var. brachiata (Steud.) P.M. Peterson & N. Snow], a closely related species, has been reported to have maximum germination at temperatures ranging from 25/15 to 30/20 C (Weller et al. Reference Weller, Florentine and Chauhan2019). Other weed species similar to D. retroflexa, including tighthead sprangletop [Leptochloa panicoides (J. Presl) Hitchc.], green sprangletop [Leptochloa dubia (Kunth) Nees], kallar grass [Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth], bearded sprangletop [Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth ssp. fascicularis (Lam.) N. Snow], and Chinese sprangletop [Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees], were also found to have a maximum germination between 20 to 35 C (Altop et al. Reference Altop, Mennan, Phillippo and Zandstra2015; Baskin et al. Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1999; Benvenuti et al. Reference Benvenuti, Dinelli and Bonetti2003; Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2008; Roundy and Biedenbender Reference Roundy and Biedenbender1996).
Results from this experiment suggest that D. retroflexa can germinate at a broad range of temperatures, that is, in summer, spring, and autumn seasons in northern Australia. Although seeds cannot germinate in cold temperatures (15/5 C), they can germinate as the temperature increases up to 30/20 C, but beyond this, germination will again decline. This indicates that extreme cold and hot environmental conditions are not favorable for the germination of D. retroflexa, and thus it might be a less problematic weed under these environmental conditions. Further, seeds may be dormant under such conditions, waiting for optimal conditions to germinate. Dinebra retroflexa’s potential to germinate in summer, spring, and autumn seasons in northern Australia (Queensland and New South Wales) will create a challenge in managing this weed in fallow and crops, such as sorghum and cotton.
Experiment 2. Effect of Light on Germination
The germination of D. retroflexa was 98% in the alternating light/dark (12 h/12 h) conditions at 30/20 C, while only 1% of seeds germinated under complete-dark (24 h) conditions. When the ungerminated seeds from the dark environment were introduced back to light conditions (12-h light/12-h dark), germination increased to 98%. These results showed that light plays an important role in the germination of D. retroflexa. These results are in line with a previous study, in which only 2% of D. retroflexa seeds germinated under complete-dark conditions (Hamada et al. Reference Hamada, Koch, Hamdoun, Kunisch and Sauerborn1993). Further, those authors reported 97% germination under light conditions (12-h/12-h light/dark), indicating the significant effect of light conditions on the germination of D. retroflexa. Leptochloa chinensis, a related weed species, was also found to exhibit photoblastic behavior, with germination completely inhibited under dark conditions (Benvenuti et al. Reference Benvenuti, Dinelli and Bonetti2003; Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2008). However, in L. panicea, 43% germination has been reported in complete darkness at 35/20 C (Baskin et al. Reference Baskin, Baskin and Chester1999). This differential germination response might be due to genetic differences among species in different agroecological conditions.
The results from this experiment showed that the seeds of D. retroflexa are highly photoblastic in nature, which means they have a specific light requirement for germination. This indicates D. retroflexa’s potential to become a more problematic weed under zero-till conditions (Cousens et al. Reference Cousens, Baweja, Vaths and Schofield1993), because weed seeds remain on or close to the soil surface under these systems. This information can be used to reduce the germination of D. retroflexa by providing shade on the ground or covering the ground with a mulch. Further, shallow tillage may help in reducing its germination by burying seeds in the soil at shallow depths.
Experiment 3. Effect of NaCl on Germination
Salt stress had a substantial impact on D. retroflexa germination. The highest germination (98%) was recorded at 0 mM NaCl (no-stress conditions), and germination gradually decreased as NaCl concentration successively increased (Figure 2; Table 3). However, 81% of seeds germinated even at 80 mM NaCl, indicating high salt tolerance for germination in this weed species. Germination declined rapidly at more than 80 mM NaCl, and only 12% of seeds germinated at 160 mM NaCl. No seeds germinated at 320 mM NaCl. The time required for 50% germination was increased from 5 to 8 d with an increase in the NaCl concentration from 0 to 80 mM.
Figure 2. Effect of sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations on germination of Dinebra retroflexa. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means. A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data; parameter estimates are given in Table 3.
Table 3. Effect of sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations on seed germination of Dinebra retroflexa. a
a A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination percentage, T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum germination, and b is the slope.
Weller et al. (Reference Weller, Florentine and Chauhan2019) also found greater than 80% germination in a closely related species, D. panicea var. brachiata, at a 100 mM NaCl concentration. Similarly, Altop et al. (Reference Altop, Mennan, Phillippo and Zandstra2015) also reported that germination of L. fusca ssp. fascicularis declined with an increase in NaCl concentrations from 0 to 100 mM. About 58% germination was observed at 100 mM NaCl, but no germination occurred at 400 mM NaCl. Another summer grass species, feather fingergrass (Chloris virgata Sw.), has been reported to be more salt sensitive, as 50% germination was recorded at 25 mM NaCl (Fernando et al. Reference Fernando, Humphries, Florentine and Chauhan2016). A high salt concentration inhibits seed germination due to physiological disturbance of metabolic processes that are affected by ion toxicity (Farooq et al. Reference Farooq, Imran, Alam, Naseem, Riaz and Shaukat2015). Further, a high concentration of salt creates a low osmotic potential around the seed, which prevents water uptake and thus inhibits germination (Welbaum et al. Reference Welbaum, Tissaoui and Bradford1990). Soils having a NaCl concentration of 20 mM are characterized as salt-affected (Abrol et al. Reference Abrol, Yadav and Massoud1988). The results of this experiment indicate that D. retroflexa is a salt-tolerant weed species, and due to the increased area with salt-affected soils in the dry region of Australia (Rengasamy Reference Rengasamy2002), D. retroflexa could soon be a concern in these areas.
Experiment 4. Effect of Osmotic Potential on Germination
Osmotic potential was observed to have a significant effect on the germination of D. retroflexa. At 0 MPa, the maximum seed germination (93%) was recorded, and germination decreased with an increase in water stress (Figure 3; Table 4). Only 25% germination was observed at −0.4 MPa, and no germination occurred at −0.8 MPa and −1.6 MPa. It took about 6 d for 50% germination at 0 MPa, while it took double that time (12 d) to reach 50% germination at −0.4 MPa.
Figure 3. Effect of osmotic potential on germination of Dinebra retroflexa. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means. A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data; parameter estimates are given in Table 4.
Table 4. Effect of osmotic potential on germination of Dinebra retroflexa. a
a A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination percentage, T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum germination, and b is the slope.
Similar to the current study, Hamada et al. (Reference Hamada, Koch, Hamdoun, Kunisch and Sauerborn1993) also reported a decreasing trend of germination of D. retroflexa with increasing water stress. Likewise, 97% germination was reported in D. panicea var. brachiata under no moisture stress (0 MPa), and germination was reduced to 55% at −0.8 MPa (Weller et al. Reference Weller, Florentine and Chauhan2019). In contrast to the gradual decline in the germination of D. retroflexa, some grass species are found to be more sensitive to water stress. Chloris virgata, for example, showed a 50% reduction in germination with a slight change in osmotic potential from 0 MPa to −0.09 MPa (Fernando et al. Reference Fernando, Humphries, Florentine and Chauhan2016). The results of the current study indicate high germination of D. retroflexa under irrigated conditions, but it can also tolerate water stress to some extent, as almost 70% of seeds germinated even at −0.2 MPa, demonstrating water-stress tolerance. Therefore, D. retroflexa could be a problem for growers to manage under salt- and moisture-stress conditions. Australia regularly faces drought conditions that impact crop production. Results suggest that D. retroflexa will further impact crop production under such conditions.
Experiment 5. Effect of Seed Burial Depth on Emergence
A significant effect of seed burial depth was observed on the seedling emergence of D. retroflexa. The highest germination (83%) was recorded for seeds placed on the soil surface (0 cm), and emergence decreased to 13% and 9% at seed burial depths of 0.5 and 1.0 cm, respectively (Figure 4; Table 5). A burial depth of 0.2 cm was required to inhibit 50% of seedling emergence. The time required to accomplish 50% emergence from 0, 0.5, and 1.0 cm was almost similar (10 to 11 d). At 2-cm and greater depths, seedling emergence was completely inhibited. Weller et al. (Reference Weller, Florentine and Chauhan2019) also found the highest germination (50%) of D. panicea var. brachiata on the soil surface. Previous research also reported that more than 80% of seeds of L. chinensis germinated on the soil surface, and emergence occurred only from depths shallower than 2 cm (Benvenuti et al. Reference Benvenuti, Dinelli and Bonetti2003; Chauhan and Johnson Reference Chauhan and Johnson2008).
Figure 4. Effect of seed burial depth and time after planting on emergence of Dinebra retroflexa (A) and effect of depth on cumulative emergence (B). A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the germination data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination percentage, T 50 is the time in days required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination, and b is the slope (B). An exponential decay model, E = a * e −bD , was fit to the seedling emergence from different seed burial depths, where E is the emergence percentage at burial depth D, a is the maximum emergence, and b is the slope (B). The vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means.
Table 5. Effect of seed burial depth on emergence of Dinebra retroflexa. a
a A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the emergence data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative emergence percentage at time x, a is the maximum emergence percentage, T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum emergence, and b is the slope.
Other small-seeded species, such as feather lovegrass [Eragrostis tenella (L.) P. Beauv. ex Roem. & Schult.], also showed the highest germination (69%) from the soil surface (Chauhan Reference Chauhan2013). Dinebra retroflexa seeds are photoblastic, as made evident by the light/dark experiment, thus explaining greater germination on the soil surface compared with burial at varying depths. Furthermore, anaerobic soil conditions and limited food reserves are possible reasons for low germination or emergence from deep seed burial depths (Baskin and Baskin Reference Baskin and Baskin1998). The high germination of D. retroflexa on the soil surface demonstrates its potential to establish under no-till conditions, where most of the seeds remain on the soil surface (Chauhan et al. Reference Chauhan, Gill and Preston2006). Therefore, a shallow-tillage operation could help in burying the seeds of D. retroflexa below the depth of emergence.
Experiment 6. Effect of Wheat Crop Residue Amount on Emergence
Seedling emergence of D. retroflexa was significantly affected by the amount of wheat residue on the soil surface. The highest emergence (82%) was recorded under a no-residue load (Figure 5; Table 6). Emergence was reduced from 72% to 28% with an increase in the residue load from 1,000 to 4,000 kg ha−1, and only 2% emergence was recorded under a residue load of 8,000 kg ha−1. A residue load of 3,900 kg ha−1 was required to reduce emergence by 50%. The time required to reach 50% emergence increased from 7 to 13 d with the increase in the residue load from 0 to 4,000 kg ha−1. The high-residue amount may have created dark conditions for seeds, and thus the lack of light and the physical barrier created due to the residue load might be the reasons for the poor emergence of D. retroflexa.
Figure 5. Effect of wheat crop residue load and time after planting on emergence of Dinebra retroflexa (A) and effect of residue load on cumulative emergence of D. retroflexa (B). A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the emergence data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative germination percentage at time x, a is the maximum germination percentage, T 50 is the time in days required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination, and b is the slope (A). A linear model (E = a − bR) was fit to the emergence obtained at different residue loads, where E is the emergence percentage at crop residue amount R, a is the maximum emergence, and b is the slope. The vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means.
Table 6. Effect of wheat crop residue load on emergence of Dinebra retroflexa. a
a A three-parameter sigmoid model, G = a/1 + e[−(x − T 50)/b], was fit to the emergence data. In the equation, G represents the cumulative emergence percentage at time x, a is the maximum emergence percentage, T 50 is the time (in days) required for 50% of maximum emergence, and b is the slope.
Another summer grass species, windmillgrass (Chloris truncata R. Br.), has been reported to have the greatest emergence (67%) under no-residue conditions, and emergence declined exponentially with an increase in sorghum residue amount. Only 7% to 15% emergence was recorded with a residue of 4,000 to 6,000 kg ha−1 (Chauhan et al. Reference Chauhan, Manalil, Florentine and Jha2018). The greatest emergence of D. retroflexa under no-residue conditions indicated its potential to infest crops under clean cultivation. Results suggest that conservation agriculture with residue retention can help in managing this weed. Further, in the case of low residue–producing crops or easily degradable residue crops, planting a cover crop before the main crop to create a residue cover could be an option to suppress D. retroflexa.
Experiment 7. Effect of Pre- and Postemergence Herbicides on Survival and Biomass
All the preemergence herbicides tested in this study provided effective control (>90%) of D. retroflexa. Applications of diuron, isoxaflutole, pendimethalin, pyroxasulfone, S-metolachlor, terbuthylazine, and triallate provided complete control (100%) of D. retroflexa. The application of trifluralin resulted in the maximum (23%) emergence of seedlings among all preemergence herbicides, followed by imazethapyr (5%) and dimethenamid-P (2%), indicating relatively poor control of D. retroflexa (Table 7). Similarly, biomass data indicated that all the tested preemergence herbicides resulted in 94% to 100% biomass reductions as compared with the control.
Table 7. Effect of preemergence herbicides on seedling survival, dry matter accumulation, and percent control based on biomass of Dinebra retroflexa.
These results are in line with a previous Indian study, in which a 70% reduction in D. retroflexa density was recorded with a preemergence application of pendimethalin (750 g ha−1) alone or in combination with imazethapyr (50 g ha−1) in a sesame (Sesamum orientale L.) crop (Singh et al. Reference Singh, Ghosh, Dubey and Singh2018). Another study conducted in Queensland, Australia, found that preemergence applications of pendimethalin (1,496 g ha−1) and S-metolachlor (960 g ha−1) resulted in complete control (100%) of D. retroflexa in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Iqbal et al. Reference Iqbal, Manalil, Chauhan and Adkins2019). Patel et al. (Reference Patel, Spare and Malgaya2019) also found maximum biomass reduction (75%) of D. retroflexa in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] with the application of imazethapyr + propaquizafop (75.0 + 62.5 g ha−1). Results from the present study showed the importance of preemergence herbicides for effective control of D. retroflexa.
All the postemergence herbicides applied at the 5- to 6- and 11- to 12-leaf stages resulted in complete control (100%) of D. retroflexa (data not shown). Biomass accumulated in the control treatment was 5.15 ± 0.93 g pot−1 at the 5- to 6-leaf stage and 8.23 ± 0.52 g pot−1 at the 11- to 12-leaf stage of the plant. Similar to our results, Iqbal et al. (Reference Iqbal, Manalil, Chauhan and Adkins2019) also reported that a postemergence application of glyphosate + pendimethalin (1,034 + 1,496 g ha−1) resulted in 100% biomass reduction of D. retroflexa in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. These results indicate that D. retroflexa can be effectively managed with the application of commonly used postemergence herbicides. These results are based on a small number of pot-grown plants derived from a single population. Therefore, future research needs to be done to study the effectiveness of these pre- and postemergence herbicides under field conditions, as plants may be under stress and exhibiting variable sizes under field conditions, which may reduce herbicide efficacy. Further, there is a need to rotate herbicides with different sites of action to delay the evolution of resistance in D. retroflexa.
In summary, seeds of D. retroflexa are likely to germinate over a wide range of environmental conditions. Seed germination over a wide temperature range demonstrates its potential to expand throughout Australia’s summer, autumn, spring, and mild winter seasons. Poor germination in dark conditions suggests the inability of this weed species to emerge from greater depths or under a dense canopy. High germination under high soil moisture and salinity conditions indicates its potential to spread in irrigated areas and salt-affected soils of Australia. No-till cropping systems or shallow cultivation would favor its infestation. Results from this study showed that even a shallow-tillage operation may bury the seeds of D. retroflexa and restrict its emergence. Further, the retention of wheat residue on the soil surface creates dark conditions and acts as a barrier to its emergence; therefore, it will help in reducing its seedling emergence. Although D. retroflexa can be easily controlled with the application of commonly used pre- or postemergence herbicides, the chemical option should be used in addition to other management tools to avoid herbicide resistance issues in this weed species.
Acknowledgments
There was no specific grant received for this research from any commercial or not-for-profit organization or any funding agency. No conflicts of interest have been declared.
Open access
