Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:53:16.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus: systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Chen Ee Low Open the ORCID record for Chen Ee Low [Opens in a new window] ,
Sheryl Yen Pin Tan ,
Andre Loh ,
Jingrong Yu ,
Joel Zuo Er Ong ,
Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh ,
Chun En Yau ,
Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee  and
Cyrus Su Hui Ho
Chen Ee Low
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Sheryl Yen Pin Tan
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Andre Loh
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Jingrong Yu
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Joel Zuo Er Ong
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Chun En Yau
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee
Affiliation:
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Cyrus Su Hui Ho*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; and Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
*
Correspondence: Cyrus Su Hui Ho. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Various studies have highlighted the increased incidence and symptoms of depression and anxiety in paediatric cancer survivors (PCS). Yet no meta-analysis has focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in PCS and their family nucleus.

Aims

To evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in PCS and their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and high PTSS.

Method

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies comparing the risk of PTSD and PTSS severity among PCS, their family nucleus and non-cancer controls. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.

Results

From 1089 records, we included 21 studies. PCS have an increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37–4.06) and decreased PTSS severity (standardised mean difference −0.29, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.08). Subgroup analyses of other categorical study-level characteristics revealed that female PCS who were older at diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Meta-regression were insignificant. Family nucleus did not show a significantly increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59–5.00) and PTSS severity (standardised mean difference 0.53, 95% CI −0.00 to 1.06). Systematically reviewing studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma compared with the comparator. Lower education, income and social status were also risk factors.

Conclusions

Timely identification and interventions are imperative for policy makers and healthcare providers to prevent trauma from worsening in this population group.

Keywords

Trauma and stressor-related disorderssystematic reviewchild and adolescent psychiatrymeta-analysiscarers
Type
Review
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , November 2024 , e207
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

In the 21st century, cancer remains one of the top causes of mortality.Reference Bray, Laversanne, Weiderpass and Soerjomataram1 Every year, globally, there are an estimated 400 000 new cases of cancer in children and adolescents of up to 19 years old.Reference Steliarova-Foucher, Colombet, Ries, Moreno, Dolya and Bray2 Remarkable improvements in childhood cancer treatment and education have significantly increased both survival and attitudes toward adverse situations for the vast majority of childhood cancer survivors and their parents.Reference Smith, Altekruse, Adamson, Reaman and Seibel3 However, paediatric cancer survivors may experience greater isolation from social activities than their peers, causing adverse psychosocial outcomes.Reference Ahomäki, Gunn, Madanat-Harjuoja, Matomäki, Malila and Lähteenmäki4 Literature indicates that one of the most important psychological consequences for paediatric cancer survivors is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).Reference Tremolada, Bonichini, Basso and Pillon5 The risk of PTSD and mental health conditions has been shown to be much higher in paediatric cancer survivors, and results in significant morbidity.Reference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6–Reference Lee, Low, Yau, Li, Ho and Ho8

Post-traumatic stress disorder and symptoms

Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) that constitute the diagnosis of PTSD have been a useful framework for understanding the incidence of PTSD in paediatric cancer survivors.Reference Kazak, Rourke, Alderfer, Pai, Reilly and Meadows9 Subclinical levels of PTSS are extremely common (up to 73.3%), and they cause serious consequences among paediatric cancer survivors and their families.Reference Kazak, Alderfer, Rourke, Simms, Streisand and Grossman10 For example, PTSD and PTSS can impair medical outcomes, greatly limit the quality of life and reduce educational and occupational achievement.Reference Marusak, Harper, Taub and Rabinak11 It is widely known that childhood cancer-related PTSS is associated with neurocognitive deficits and psychiatric comorbidities.Reference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Wiener, Battles, Bernstein, Long, Derdak and Mackall13 The treatment experience for paediatric cancer is a complex process that is time-consuming and exhausting.Reference Sloper14 Different treatments, including chemotherapy, surgery and radiation, can cause long-term psychological side-effects.Reference Pui, Cheng, Leung, Rai, Rivera and Sandlund15 This could result from many reasons such as comorbidities, pain from disease, fear of death and the burden it places on their family. Others have proposed that biologically, exposure to cancer may increase one's vulnerability in expressing PTSS.Reference Marusak, Harper, Taub and Rabinak11

High levels of PTSD and PTSS among children diagnosed with cancer have been shown to translate to a greater risk of psychiatric conditions in adulthood if left untreated.Reference Kolaitis16 Without treatment, these conditions can turn chronic and affect normal psychosocial functioning in adulthood.Reference Kolaitis16 A survey-based study found that one in five paediatric cancer survivors develop severe distress into adulthood that meet criteria for PTSD diagnosis.Reference Hobbie, Stuber, Meeske, Wissler, Rourke and Ruccione17 Therefore, there is a critical need to intervene during vulnerable periods after paediatric cancer survivors’ traumatic cancer experience.

Family nucleus

Interest in the prevalence of PTSD and PTSS in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors has risen in recent years. Because of the severe and distressing effects of cancer, young children rely heavily on their families during and after illness.Reference Deegan, Brennan, Gallagher, Lambert and Dunne18 These psychological consequences on the family members of paediatric cancer survivors could hamper their capacity to participate in important decision-making about their loved one's treatment, or even to provide emotional support.Reference Carlsson, Kukkola, Ljungman, Hovén and von Essen19 This could also deepen the effect of trauma on the paediatric cancer survivors. Thus, coupled with the various psychological, social and somatic difficulties that the family nucleus experiences,Reference Lewandowska20,Reference Low, Loke, Rana, Sim and Ho21 psychological trauma in the family nucleus is another complex issue to target.

Objective

Various studies over the years have highlighted depression and anxiety incidence or symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors, with findings ranging from inconclusive, significantly reduced or increased risk compared with age-matched comparators. Previously, we explored the trends of PTSS in paediatric cancer survivors over time.Reference Lee, Yau, Low, Li, Ho and Ho7 We identified only two longitudinal studies evaluating PTSS in paediatric cancer survivors, and were not able to perform meta-analysis because of limited data. Both studies found that levels of PTSS remained consistently high up to 12 months after diagnosis. Detailed data on the incidence, severity and risk factors of PTSD and PTSS are already limited in paediatric cancer survivors, let alone their family nucleus. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have comprehensively focused on the risk factors, overall risk and severity of psychological trauma in both paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus. Hence, we aim to evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and the severity of psychological trauma in paediatric cancer survivors, as well as their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and PTSS.

Method

Protocol and guidance

The systematic review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO (reference: CRD42023413557).

Definitions

In our review, paediatric patients are defined as those no older than 18 years old, following the definition of the United Nations.22 Paediatric cancer survivors are those who had a prior diagnosis of any solid or haematological cancer when they were no older than 18 years old and were currently in remission at the time of the study.Reference Winzig, Inhestern, Sigmund, Paul, Hail and Rutkowski23 PTSD is defined as a chronic impairment disorder that occurs after an exposure to traumatic events, which results in disturbance to functioning.Reference Miao, Chen, Wei, Tao and Lu24 PTSS constitutes the diagnosis of PTSD and includes a wide range of mental and physical symptoms, such as problems with concentration, sleep, increased reactivity, irritability, avoidance of traumatic triggers, hypervigilance, tachycardia and dizziness.Reference Mann and Marwaha25

Data sources and search strategy

A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO. The search strategy combined search terms for paediatrics, cancer, and PTSD or PTSS. The database-controlled vocabulary was used for searching subject headings, and a large spectrum of synonyms with appropriate truncations was used for searching the title, abstract and author keywords. Given the development of trends in cancer epidemiology and cancer care, the search was limited to publications from 2000 to 26 August 2023. The full search strategies are available in Supplementary Table 1 available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.805.

Study selection: inclusion and exclusion criteria

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts of all studies for eligibility according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full text of studies assessed as ‘relevant’ or ‘unclear’ was then independently evaluated by the same two reviewers. The interrater agreement was computed, and discrepancies were resolved with adjudication by a third independent reviewer.

We included English-language, peer-reviewed studies published since 2000 that assessed the risk of PTSD or severity of PTSS following cancer diagnosis, and included paediatric cancer survivors or their family nucleus. We included studies that aimed to assess at least one of the following as a key finding: how a paediatric cancer diagnosis affected the risk of PTSD or severity of PTSS in both paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus. Non-empirical studies, non-controlled studies, grey literature, studies that did not stratify outcomes by age and studies only involving pharmacological or surgical intervention were excluded. The selection process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart.

Data analysis

The meta and metafor packages on R (version 4.1.0 for MacOS, Posit PBC, USA; https://posit.co/download/rstudio-desktop/) were used to conduct all analyses. Unless specified, we considered a two-sided P-value of <0.05 as statistically significant. For continuous outcomes, in studies without s.d. values, confidence intervals were converted to s.d. To investigate the severity of PTSS, we pooled standardised mean differences (SMD). For dichotomous outcomes, we performed separate meta-analyses for the relative risk of PTSD (measured with risk ratios compared with non-cancer controls). Sensitivity analysis was conducted with the random-effects, leave-one-out analysis, identification and exclusion of potential outliers. Between-study heterogeneity was represented by I 2 and τ2 statistics. An I 2 of <30% indicated low heterogeneity between studies, 30–60% showed moderate heterogeneity and >60% indicated substantial heterogeneity.Reference Higgins and Thompson26

Subgroup analyses and meta-regression was performed to determine if key categorical and hierarchical variables influenced the results. We assessed for publication bias via visual inspection for funnel plot asymmetry and by using Egger's test. If publication bias was suspected, we conducted a sensitivity analysis with the trim-and-fill method (R0 estimator, fixed-random effects models) to re-estimate the pooled effect size after imputing potentially missing studies.Reference Duval and Tweedie27,Reference Peters, Sutton, Jones, Abrams and Rushton28 This assumes a normal distribution of effect sizes around the centre of the funnel plot.Reference Egger, Davey Smith, Schneider and Minder29

Risk-of-bias assessment

To assess methodological quality and the risk of bias of studies, we used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist,Reference Munn, Moola, Riitano and Lisy30 which includes appraisal of the criteria for inclusion, measurement of condition, reporting of baseline characteristics, reporting of outcomes and appropriateness of the statistical analysis (if any).Reference Munn, Barker, Moola, Tufanaru, Stern and McArthur31 This appraisal was performed by two reviewers independently, with discrepancies resolved by the independent verdict of a senior reviewer.

Results

Overall population characteristics

From 1089 records, we included a total of 21 studies,Reference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Kazak, Alderfer, Rourke, Simms, Streisand and Grossman10,Reference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32–Reference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 resulting in 10 812 paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus, and 4765 non-cancer comparators (Fig. 1). Among the 21 studies, we evaluated and compared the country of study, the cancer type, the control group used for comparison and the scale used to evaluate symptoms of PTSD. There were 17 studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Kazak, Alderfer, Rourke, Simms, Streisand and Grossman10,Reference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32–Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45 focusing on paediatric cancer survivors and eight studies investigatingReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47–Reference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors. Four out of 21 studiesReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42 looked at both paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus. The main characteristics of the included studies are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies of paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus

PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; PTSS, post-traumatic stress symptoms; PTSD-RI, PTSD Reaction Index; K-SADS, Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia; CAPS-CA, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents; PCL-C, PTSD Checklist; SF-36, Short Form Survey 36 item; CBCL-PTSD, Child Behavior Checklist PTSD; IES-R, Impact of Event Scale Revised; UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles; PCL-S, PTSD Checklist Specific; DASS-21, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 item; SRS-PTSD, Self-Rating Scale for PTSD.

a. Mean (s.d.) reported unless otherwise specified.

Characteristics of the paediatric childhood survivors

Among the 17 studies on paediatric cancer survivors, most were from the USA,Reference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Kazak, Alderfer, Rourke, Simms, Streisand and Grossman10,Reference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32–Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45,Reference Phipps, Larson, Long and Rai46 two studies were from the UK,Reference Bruce41,Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43 one study was from China,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 one study was from GermanyReference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37 and one study was from Japan.Reference Ozono, Saeki, Mantani, Ogata, Okamura and Yamawaki44 All of the studies looked at paediatric cancer survivors with various cancer types, except one study on brain tumour survivorsReference Bruce41 and one study on haematological cancer survivors.Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43 Seven studiesReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Phipps, Klosky, Long, Hudson, Huang and Zhang34,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45,Reference Phipps, Larson, Long and Rai46 recruited healthy, age-matched comparators as a control group, whereas five recruited parents,Reference Kazak, Alderfer, Rourke, Simms, Streisand and Grossman10,Reference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39,Reference Bruce41,Reference Ozono, Saeki, Mantani, Ogata, Okamura and Yamawaki44 three recruited siblingsReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43 and two utilised normative population data.Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 The most prevalent scale used to evaluate symptoms of PTSD was the PTSD Reaction Index and Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) for PTSS.

Characteristics of the family nucleus of paediatric childhood survivors

Three out of the eight studies were from the USA,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42 one was from China,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 one was from Sweden,Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47 one was from Australia,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 one was from The NetherlandsReference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 and one was from Switzerland.Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48 All of the studies looked at paediatric cancer survivors with various cancer types, except one study on haematological cancer survivors.Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 Three studiesReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 utilised normative population data as a control group, whereas four studiesReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 recruited healthy, age-matched comparators and one study recruited the spouse of an affected parent.Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47 The most prevalent scale used to measure symptoms of PTSD was the PTSD Checklist and IES-R for PTSS.

Prevalence and risk of PTSD in paediatric cancer survivors

Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of developing PTSD in paediatric cancer survivors (Fig. 2).Reference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32–Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38

Fig. 2 Incidence and risk ratios of post-traumatic stress disorder in paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Survivors refers to studies with a population of paediatric cancer survivors.

Meta-analysis of 7923 paediatric cancer survivors compared with 1842 non-cancer controls showed that the risk of PTSD was significantly raised in paediatric cancer survivors (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37–4.06). Four studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35–Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37 found the risk was significantly increased in paediatric cancer survivors. The other four studies found that the risk increased, although this did not reach statistical significance. Gerhardt et alReference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33 found that the risk insignificantly decreased, but were limited by sample size, comparing 56 paediatric cancer survivors against 60 non-cancer controls.

Subgroup analyses of PTSD when stratified by various categorical variables are listed in Supplementary Table 2. Paediatric cancer survivors aged between 12 and 18 years at diagnosis (risk ratio 3.07, 95% CI 1.46–6.48) were more likely to have increased risk of PTSD than those aged between 8 and 12 years (risk ratio 2.93, 95% CI 1.43–5.98). Female paediatric cancer survivors had a significantly higher risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.84, 95% CI 1.47–5.49). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the risk of PTSD found in paediatric cancer survivors aged above 18 years old at the time of data collection (risk ratio 2.97, 95% CI 1.24–7.12). Other categorical variables used were not found to significantly increase the risk of PTSD.

Mean severity of PTSS in paediatric cancer survivors

Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the mean severity of PTSS in paediatric cancer survivorsReference Barakat, Kazak, Gallagher, Meeske and Stuber12,Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36–Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Ozono, Saeki, Mantani, Ogata, Okamura and Yamawaki44,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Survivors refers to studies with a population of paediatric cancer survivors. SMD, standardised mean difference.

Meta-analysis of 1682 paediatric cancer survivors compared with 2058 non-cancer controls showed that the mean severity of PTSS was significantly decreased in paediatric cancer survivors (SMD = −0.29, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.08). Individually, all studies except twoReference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45 found that the severity of PTSS was significantly decreased.

Subgroup analyses of the severity of PTSS among other categorical variables are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Females paediatric cancer survivors were more likely to demonstrate a lower risk of PTSS (SMD = −0.50, 95% CI −0.79 to −0.21) compared with male paediatric cancer survivors (SMD = −0.14, 95% CI −0.38 to 0.09). Paediatric cancer survivors diagnosed between 2 and 8 years old were more likely to have less severe PTSS (SMD = −0.39, 95% CI −0.75 to −0.02) compared with those diagnosed between 8 and 12 years old (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI −0.78 to 0.02) or 12 and 18 years old (SMD = −0.10, 95% CI −0.49 to 0.28). Additionally, paediatric cancer survivors aged between 12 and 18 years old at the time of data collection had the highest likelihood of less severe PTSS (SMD = −0.35, 95% CI −0.65 to −0.04) compared with those aged between 2 and 12 years old (SMD = −0.25, 95% CI −0.81 to 0.32) or aged above 18 years (SMD = −0.17, 95% CI −0.68 to 0.33). Meta-regression of gender and age at diagnosis and data collection were not significant (Supplementary Table 4).

Studies that utilised parents as controls were more likely to demonstrate a decrease in severity of PTSS (SMD = −0.48, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.23) compared with age-matched controls (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI −0.31 to 0.17). The IES-R scale was more likely to pick up the decrease in severity of PTSS (SMD = −0.47, 95% CI −0.72 to −0.22) compared with the DSM-IV scale (SMD = −0.13, 95% CI −0.33 to 0.07). The test for subgroup differences revealed a significant difference between the type of controls (P = 0.002) and type of scale used (P < 0.01). Other categorical variables used were not found to significantly decrease the severity of PTSS.

Prevalence and risk of PTSD in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors

Four studiesReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47–Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 investigated associations between risk of PTSD in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors (Table 2). Overall, two studiesReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 found a significant increase in risk of PTSD in the family nucleus compared with the comparison group. Among the family nucleus, three studiesReference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 looked at both parents and one studyReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32 focused on the mother.

Table 2 Evaluation of the mediating or confounding effect of the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms among the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors

PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; PTSS, post-traumatic stress symptoms; PCS, paediatric cancer survivors.

a. Mean (s.d.) reported unless otherwise specified.

Brown et alReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32 studied 52 mothers of paediatric cancer survivors, comparing the risk of PTSD to 42 age-matched controls. Results revealed that significantly more mothers of paediatric cancer survivors met the clinical criteria for PTSD diagnosis compared with mothers of the healthy comparison group (25% v. 7.1%; P < 0.001). Mothers of paediatric cancer survivors also reported higher PTSD symptom scores than their counterparts (P < 0.001). Baenziger et alReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48 found that there was no significant association in the prevalence of PTSD among 663 parents of paediatric cancer survivors and 391 comparison parents (4.8% v. 6.7%; P = 0.210). McCarthy et alReference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 observed 77 parents of paediatric cancer survivors compared with 52 parents with healthy children. Using the symptom cluster method of scoring with the Post-traumatic Stress Checklist Specific, there was a significantly higher prevalence of PTSD compared with the control group (10% v. 0%; P < 0.05). Clawson et alReference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42 examined 168 parents of paediatric cancer survivors, comparing the risk of PTSD to 108 parents with healthy children. Although there were 34 total PTSD diagnoses made, they did not find any significant increase in risk of PTSD between the parents of paediatric cancer survivors and parents of healthy children. Further analysis found that parents of children who experienced a relapse had a higher prevalence of PTSD compared with parents of children with no relapse or parents of healthy children (27.6% v. 19.9% v. 9.8%; P = 0.047).

Meta-analysis was performed on 792 family nuclei of paediatric cancer survivors compared with 484 non-cancer controlsReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 (Fig. 4). The overall risk of PTSD in the family nucleus was not significantly increased (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59–5.00). Individually, only Brown et alReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32 found that the risk of PTSD was significantly increased.

Fig. 4 Incidence and risk ratios of post-traumatic stress disorder in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Family nucleus refers to studies with a population of family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors.

Mean severity of PTSS in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors

Seven studiesReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47–Reference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 looked at the severity of PTSS in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors (Table 2). Overall, four out of seven studiesReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 found that the severity of PTSS in the family nucleus was significantly increased compared with the comparison group. Among the family nucleus, all of the studies focused on both parents, except two studiesReference Pöder, Ljungman and von Essen47,Reference van Gorp, Joosten, Maas, Drenth, van der Aa–van Delden and Kremer50 investigating only the mothers of paediatric cancer survivors.

Clawson et alReference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42 studied 168 parents of paediatric cancer survivors diagnosed under the age of 18 years and compared the severity of PTSS to 79 age- and country-matched controls. Results revealed that parents of paediatric cancer survivors demonstrated a significantly increased severity of PTSS compared with parents of the healthy comparison group (P < 0.001). McCarthy et alReference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 found that 77 parents of paediatric cancer survivors experienced a significant increase in the severity of PTSS, compared with 52 comparison parents with healthy children (17% v. 4%; P = 0.026). Higher scores were also associated with being out of shape (49% v. 20%; P < 0.001) and poorer sleep (42% v. 26%; P = 0.004). Yang et alReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 observed 91 parents of paediatric cancer survivors compared with 96 parents of healthy children. Parents of paediatric cancer survivors reported significantly higher PTSS severity than parents in the comparison group (P < 0.001). None of the demographic variables analysed, such as age, gender, time since cancer diagnosis and relapse status, were found to be significantly associated with PTSS severity. Tillery et alReference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38 examined 50 parents of paediatric cancer survivors and did not find any significant increase in severity of PTSS (P = 0.24) when compared with 47 parents of healthy children. Analysis of age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, treatment intensity, treatment status and relapse status did not reveal any significant predictors of PTSS severity.

Meta-analysis of 386 family nuclei of paediatric cancer survivors compared with 273 non-cancer controlsReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Clawson, Jurbergs, Lindwall and Phipps42,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 (Fig. 5) showed that risk was not significantly increased for mean severity of PTSS (SMD = 0.53, 95% CI −0.00 to 1.06). Individually, all of the studies found that the severity of PTSS was significantly increased in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors.

Fig. 5 Mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Family nucleus refers to studies with a population of family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors. SMD, standardised mean difference.

Education

Seven studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39,Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 looked at the association between level of educational attainment and risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS (Supplementary Table 5). Out of the seven studies, fiveReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39 focused on paediatric cancer survivors and twoReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 looked at the family nucleus. Specifically, threeReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37 out of the five studies on paediatric cancer survivors found significant association between lower educational attainment levels and increased risk of PTSD. The remaining two studiesReference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39 described no association between education level and risk of PTSD or severity of PTSS. Among the two studies on family nucleus, only oneReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48 found a significant association between lower educational attainment and increased severity of PTSS.

Social status and income level

Nine studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference Bruce41,Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45,Reference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 looked at the association between social status (marital or partnership status, employment status, social support and social integration) and risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS (Supplementary Table 6). Among the nine studies, sixReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference Bruce41,Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45 looked at paediatric cancer survivors, twoReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48,Reference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 focused on the family nucleus and one investigated both populations.Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32 FiveReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Schwartz and Drotar35,Reference Seitz, Besier, Debatin, Grabow, Dieluweit and Hinz37,Reference D'Urso, Mastroyannopoulou, Kirby and Meiser-Stedman43 studies on paediatric cancer survivors found a significant association between having a better social status and increased risk of PTSD and higher severity of PTSS. Those who were employed, had partners and positive social support had lower levels of PTSD or decreased severity of PTSS. Out of the three studies on the family nucleus, only oneReference McCarthy, Marks, Mulraney, Downie, Matson and De Luca49 did not find any significant association. Brown et alReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32 found that having greater social support reduced risk of PTSD in mothers, and Baenziger et alReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48 observed that being in a partnership resulted in lower severity of PTSS.

Eight studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36,Reference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45,Reference Phipps, Larson, Long and Rai46 investigated associations between income level and risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS (Supplementary Table 7). Overall, five studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Gerhardt, Yopp, Leininger, Valerius, Correll and Vannatta33,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39,Reference Phipps, Jurbergs and Long45,Reference Phipps, Larson, Long and Rai46 focused on paediatric cancer survivors, twoReference Brown, Madan-Swain and Lambert32,Reference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 looked at the family nucleus and oneReference Tillery, Willard, Long and Phipps38 investigated both populations. Two studiesReference Stuber, Meeske, Krull, Leisenring, Stratton and Kazak6,Reference Bemis, Yarboi, Gerhardt, Vannatta, Desjardins and Murphy39 on paediatric cancer survivors found a significant association between lower income levels and increased risk of PTSD and higher severity of PTSS. Among the three studies on the family nucleus, only oneReference Yang, He, Chen, Tan, Meng and Cai36 reported a significant association between lower income levels and increased severity of parental PTSS.

Risk of bias, publication bias and sensitivity analyses

The quality of the methodologies of the 21 studies included in the meta-analysis, as scored with the JBI Checklist, is presented in Supplementary Table 8. Overall, no significant risk of bias in the studies was identified. Sensitivity analyses, funnel plots, trim-and-fill method and Egger's test showed some publication bias (Supplementary Figs 1–10).

Discussion

Our results suggest that a paediatric cancer diagnosis is significantly associated with an increased risk of PTSD and lower severity of PTSS compared with non-cancer controls. Subgroup analyses revealed that paediatric cancer survivors who were female and older at the time of diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Additionally, paediatric cancer survivors who were female and younger at the time of diagnosis had the highest likelihood of decreased severity of PTSS. Family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors did not demonstrate a significantly increased risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS. Systematically reviewing the studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS when compared with the comparator arm. Included studies investigated patients with a range of characteristics, including gender, control type, age at diagnosis and data collection, scales used, as well as social, cultural and economic backgrounds. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate the burden of a paediatric cancer diagnosis on the risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in both paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus.

Although a large majority of cancer patients are older adults,Reference Van Herck, Feyaerts, Alibhai, Papamichael, Decoster and Lambrechts51 the incidence of cancer in the paediatric population is rapidly rising.Reference Scott, Stoltzfus, Tchelebi, Trifiletti, Lehrer and Rao52,Reference Hubbard, Spector, Fortuna, Marcotte and Poynter53 These children are predisposed to psychosocial problems such as depression and anxiety, which may require complex treatments.Reference Nass, Beaupin, Demark-Wahnefried, Fasciano, Ganz and Hayes-Lattin54,Reference Low, Loke, Pang, Sim and Yang55 The trauma that a cancer diagnosis and treatment can cause to a patient has been well studied. Yet, there is relatively scarce literature on the negative repercussions and long-term effects on paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus.

Our study demonstrated that paediatric cancer survivors have an increased risk of PTSD and lower severity of PTSS compared with controls. A younger age is consistently associated with higher rates of psychiatric syndromes and distress.Reference Kroenke, Rosner, Chen, Kawachi, Colditz and Holmes56 Paediatric patients tend to present with more aggressive disease compared with older adults, likely because of limited treatment options and higher treatment burden.Reference Albritton and Eden57 Furthermore, multiple studiesReference Walsh, Donnelly and Rybicki58–Reference Mao, Armstrong, Bowman, Xie, Kadakia and Farrar60 have demonstrated that throughout all cancer phases, a younger age is associated with greater cancer pain, more negative outlook, poorer quality of life and higher concerns about sexuality, body image and fertility. Allen et alReference Allen, Willard, Klosky, Li, Srivastava and Robison61 conducted a cohort study and found that one in eight long-term survivors of childhood cancer had PTSD, compared with an insignificant rate among the long-term adult cancer population. It may seem counterintuitive that paediatric cancer survivors have higher levels of PTSD, but lower severity of PTSS. However, in the natural course of adjustment to the cancer, it is expected that PTSS decrease over time.Reference Kazak, Boeving, Alderfer, Hwang and Reilly62,Reference Bakker, Van Loey, Van Son and Van der Heijden63 This has been shown in other psychological conditions, such as anxiety.Reference Millar and Millar64 Post-traumatic growth could also explain this phenomenon, where individuals experience a positive psychological change after struggling with a difficult life circumstances.Reference Zhang, Liu, Wang and Ni65 Another possible explanation for the apparently decreased PTSS could be that most of the studies recruited family members as the non-cancer controls. Family members may be prone to more psychological stress after witnessing the struggles of their loved ones. Future studies should recruit matched controls who have experienced other forms of psychological trauma.

Various factors, such as age at diagnosis or data collection and gender, were found to significantly affect psychological trauma in paediatric cancer survivors. Alderfer et al explained that worsening levels of PTSD with age could be a result of the cumulative recollection of the situation, greater understanding of the realities of cancer, and societal pressures and norms that they interacted with.Reference Alderfer, Navsaria and Kazak66 The mental pressure could potentially put them at a higher risk compared with younger cancer survivors. Another hypothesis on differing PTSS scores with age could be attributable to delayed neurodevelopment effects on the hippocampus and amygdala.Reference Herringa, Phillips, Almeida, Insana and Germain67 During the early stages of life, centres of the brain responsible for emotional response and regulation are known to be adaptable.Reference Perlman and Pelphrey68 Even if the symptoms do not appear immediately after the event, experiencing trauma or a series of traumatic events over time could heighten an individual's vulnerability to psychopathology.Reference Maschi, Baer, Morrissey and Moreno69 Our study also found that females experienced greater risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS. Similar findings have been replicated across different international studies.Reference Seedat, Stein and Carey70–Reference Olff, Langeland, Draijer and Gersons72 Some of the possible explanations include having a more sensitive hypothalamus-pituitary-axis compared with men,Reference Heck and Handa73 where amygdala hyperactivity has been shown to be associated with PTSD,Reference Morey, Gold, LaBar, Beall, Brown and Haswell74 and females having a higher amount of empathy.Reference Christov-Moore, Simpson, Coudé, Grigaityte, Iacoboni and Ferrari75

Studies that recruited siblings or parents of the paediatric cancer survivors allowed valuable insights into the development of psychological trauma within the family. These studies revealed that levels of PTSD and PTSS among siblings and parents were higher than the general population, although statistically insignificant. Like the paediatric cancer survivors, family members commonly experience psychological trauma.Reference Kazak, Boeving, Alderfer, Hwang and Reilly62 Family members could be exposed to multiple potentially traumatic events during the treatment of paediatric cancer survivors. Those may include the diagnosis process, hospital admissions/stays, seeing their loved one in pain, adverse effects of treatment, fear of losing their loved one and deaths of other patients.Reference Kazak, Barakat, Alderfer, Rourke, Meeske and Gallagher76 However, family dynamics and other factors could affect how every family handles a traumatic event.Reference McDonald and Deatrick77 A nationwide cross-sectional study by Baenziger et alReference Baenziger, Roser, Mader, Harju, Ansari and Waespe48 found no increased risk of PTSS among parents of paediatric cancer survivors compared with parents within the general population. Future research should focus on understanding and supporting the entire family to help manage and resolve such symptoms in the long term.

Lower levels of educational attainment, income and social status were also found to be significant risk factors for PTSD and PTSS in paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus. These risk factors are well-studied and consistent across studies globally.Reference Charuvastra and Cloitre78–Reference Low, Pillay, Teo, Loh, Yau and Yan Bin Lee80 With the increase in the burden of cancerReference Bruce41 and worsening challenges of inequality,Reference Lai, Yu and Woo81 our findings serve to highlight the importance of allocating resources to enhance effective detection and prevention strategies. This may guide future active and passive surveillance in these vulnerable subgroups. Across the age spectrum, a diagnosis of cancer is known to result in significant accompanying morbidity and poorer treatment outcomes.Reference Low, Yau, Tan, Ong, Ho and Ho82,Reference Lee, Leong, Lau, Tan, Ho and Ho83 To directly address the needs of paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus, psycho-oncological interventions should be developed to capitalise on these risk factors.

Limitations

Our review faced several limitations. First, the observed associations in our study were subjected to substantial heterogeneity across studies, which varied across countries and populations, spanning a range of sociocultural and economic backgrounds. We anticipated heterogeneity in methods of defining and assessing these variables, and hence we adopted the synthesis without meta-analysis approach. Second, the instruments and questionnaires that quantified PTSS burden had a degree of heterogeneity. Although these validated instruments evaluated similar domains, there remains heterogeneity that may not be accounted for. Finally, the assessment of risk factors could be less granular, as we did not obtain individual patient data for our meta-analysis. To overcome this, we systematically synthesised the individual analyses performed by each study, to identify vulnerability factors.

In conclusion, we elucidated a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma among paediatric cancer survivors. The family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors was not at significantly increased risk of psychological trauma. A diagnosis of cancer is not only associated with physical burden, but also a lasting psychological impact on the patient, family and social units. If unaddressed, high levels of this psychological trauma may translate to a greater risk of psychiatric comorbidities during adulthood. Most importantly, timely identification and intervention is imperative for both policy makers and healthcare providers, to prevent worsening of PTSD and PTSS among paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.805

Data availability

Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Author contributions

C.E.L. contributed to conception and design of the study, with guidance from A.R.Y.B.L. C.E.L. and S.Y.P.T. screened and selected the studies. C.E.L., S.Y.P.T., A.L., J.Y., J.Z.E.O. and C.Y.L.L. performed the data extraction. C.E.L. wrote the manuscript. C.E.L., S.Y.P.T., A.L., J.Y., J.Z.E.O., C.Y.L.L., C.E.Y., A.R.Y.B.L. and C.S.H.H. reviewed and revised the manuscript. C.S.H.H. provided supervision. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Funding

Funding for this publication was provided by National University Health Service (NUHS) Department funding. NUHS had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit the paper for publication. The funding was awarded to C.S.H.H.

Declaration of interest

None.

References

Bray, F, Laversanne, M, Weiderpass, E, Soerjomataram, I. The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide. Cancer 2021; 127(16): 3029–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steliarova-Foucher, E, Colombet, M, Ries, LAG, Moreno, F, Dolya, A, Bray, F, et al. International incidence of childhood cancer, 2001–10: a population-based registry study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18(6): 719–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, MA, Altekruse, SF, Adamson, PC, Reaman, GH, Seibel, NL. Declining childhood and adolescent cancer mortality. Cancer 2014; 120(16): 2497–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahomäki, R, Gunn, ME, Madanat-Harjuoja, LM, Matomäki, J, Malila, N, Lähteenmäki, PM. Late psychiatric morbidity in survivors of cancer at a young age: a nationwide registry-based study. Int J Cancer 2015; 137(1): 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremolada, M, Bonichini, S, Basso, G, Pillon, M. Post-traumatic stress symptoms and post-traumatic growth in 223 childhood cancer survivors: predictive risk factors. Front Psychol 2016; 7: 287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuber, ML, Meeske, KA, Krull, KR, Leisenring, W, Stratton, K, Kazak, AE, et al. Prevalence and predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatrics 2010; 125(5): e1124–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, AR, Yau, CE, Low, CE, Li, J, Ho, RCM, Ho, CS. Severity and longitudinal course of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress in paediatric and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12(5): 1784.Google Scholar
Lee, ARYB, Low, CE, Yau, CE, Li, J, Ho, R, Ho, CSH. Lifetime burden of psychological symptoms, disorders, and suicide Due to cancer in childhood, adolescent, and young adult years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177(8): 790–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazak, AE, Rourke, MT, Alderfer, MA, Pai, A, Reilly, AF, Meadows, AT. Evidence-based assessment, intervention and psychosocial care in pediatric oncology: a blueprint for comprehensive services across treatment. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32(9): 1099–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazak, AE, Alderfer, M, Rourke, MT, Simms, S, Streisand, R, Grossman, JR. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in families of adolescent childhood cancer survivors. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29(3): 211–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marusak, HA, Harper, FW, Taub, JW, Rabinak, CA. Pediatric cancer, posttraumatic stress and fear-related neural circuitry. Int J Hematol Oncol 2019; 8(2): IJH17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barakat, LP, Kazak, AE, Gallagher, PR, Meeske, K, Stuber, M. Posttraumatic stress symptoms and stressful life events predict the long-term adjustment of survivors of childhood cancer and their mothers. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2000; 7(4): 189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, L, Battles, H, Bernstein, D, Long, L, Derdak, J, Mackall, CL, et al. Persistent psychological distress in long-term survivors of pediatric sarcoma: the experience at a single institution. Psychooncology 2006; 15(10): 898–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloper, P. Predictors of distress in parents of children with cancer: a prospective study. J Pediatr Psychol 2000; 25(2): 79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pui, C-H, Cheng, C, Leung, W, Rai, SN, Rivera, GK, Sandlund, JT, et al. Extended follow-up of long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(7): 640–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolaitis, G. Trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2017; 8(supp 4): 1351198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbie, WL, Stuber, M, Meeske, K, Wissler, K, Rourke, MT, Ruccione, K, et al. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(24): 4060–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deegan, A, Brennan, C, Gallagher, P, Lambert, V, Dunne, S. Social support and childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review (2006–2022). Psychooncology 2023; 32(6): 819–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, T, Kukkola, L, Ljungman, L, Hovén, E, von Essen, L. Psychological distress in parents of children treated for cancer: an explorative study. PLoS One 2019; 14(6): e0218860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewandowska, A. Influence of a child's cancer on the functioning of their family. Children (Basel) 2021; 8(7): 592.Google ScholarPubMed
Low, CE, Loke, S, Rana, S, Sim, B, Ho, CSH. Prevalence and incidence of suicide, suicidal ideation and self-harm in caregivers of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2024; 90: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Definition of Child: Convention on the Rights of the Child: Article 1. United Nations, 1989 (https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-child).Google Scholar
Winzig, J, Inhestern, L, Sigmund, D, Paul, V, Hail, LA, Rutkowski, S, et al. Exploring the perspective of adolescent childhood cancer survivors on follow-up care and their concerns regarding the transition process-a qualitative content analysis. Cancer Med 2024; 13(10): e7234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, XR, Chen, QB, Wei, K, Tao, KM, Lu, ZJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder: from diagnosis to prevention. Mil Med Res 2018; 5(1): 32.Google ScholarPubMed
Mann, SK, Marwaha, R. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. StatPearls, 2023 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32644555/).Google Scholar
Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21(11): 1539–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duval, S, Tweedie, R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56(2): 455–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, JL, Sutton, AJ, Jones, DR, Abrams, KR, Rushton, L. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Stat Med 2007; 26(25): 4544–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, M, Davey Smith, G, Schneider, M, Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109): 629–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munn, Z, Moola, S, Riitano, D, Lisy, K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag 2014; 3(3): 123–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munn, Z, Barker, TH, Moola, S, Tufanaru, C, Stern, C, McArthur, A, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18(10): 2127–33.Google Scholar
Brown, RT, Madan-Swain, A, Lambert, R. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer and their mothers. J Traum Stress 2003; 16(4): 309–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerhardt, CA, Yopp, JM, Leininger, L, Valerius, KS, Correll, J, Vannatta, K, et al. Brief report: post-traumatic stress during emerging adulthood in survivors of pediatric cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32(8): 1018–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, S, Klosky, JL, Long, A, Hudson, MM, Huang, Q, Zhang, H, et al. Posttraumatic stress and psychological growth in children with cancer: has the traumatic impact of cancer been overestimated? J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(7): 641–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, L, Drotar, D. Posttraumatic stress and related impairment in survivors of childhood cancer in early adulthood compared to healthy peers. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31(4): 356–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, He, X, Chen, J, Tan, X, Meng, J, Cai, R, et al. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in Chinese children with ongoing cancer treatment and their parents: are they elevated relative to healthy comparisons? Eur J Cancer Care 2022; 31(2): e13554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seitz, DCM, Besier, T, Debatin, K-M, Grabow, D, Dieluweit, U, Hinz, A, et al. Posttraumatic stress, depression and anxiety among adult long-term survivors of cancer in adolescence. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46(9): 1596–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tillery, R, Willard, VW, Long, A, Phipps, S. Posttraumatic stress in young children with cancer: risk factors and comparison with healthy peers. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66(8): e27775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bemis, H, Yarboi, J, Gerhardt, CA, Vannatta, K, Desjardins, L, Murphy, LK, et al. Childhood cancer in context: sociodemographic factors, stress, and psychological distress among mothers and children. J Pediatr Psychol 2015; 40(8): 733–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, M, Gumley, D, Isham, L, Fearon, P, Phipps, K. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in childhood brain tumour survivors and their parents. Child Care Health Dev 2010; 37(2): 244–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, M. A systematic and conceptual review of posttraumatic stress in childhood cancer survivors and their parents. Clin Psychol Rev 2006; 26(3): 233–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clawson, AH, Jurbergs, N, Lindwall, J, Phipps, S. Concordance of parent proxy report and child self-report of posttraumatic stress in children with cancer and healthy children: influence of parental posttraumatic stress. Psychooncology 2013; 22(11): 2593–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Urso, A, Mastroyannopoulou, K, Kirby, A, Meiser-Stedman, R. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in young people with cancer and their siblings: results from a UK sample. J Psychos Oncol 2018; 36(6): 768–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozono, S, Saeki, T, Mantani, T, Ogata, A, Okamura, H, Yamawaki, S. Factors related to posttraumatic stress in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer and their parents. Support Care Cancer 2007; 15(3): 309–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, S, Jurbergs, N, Long, A. Symptoms of post-traumatic stress in children with cancer: does personality trump health status? Psychooncology 2009; 18(9): 992–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phipps, S, Larson, S, Long, A, Rai, SN. Adaptive style and symptoms of posttraumatic stress in children with cancer and their parents. J Pediatr Psychol 2006; 31(3): 298–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pöder, U, Ljungman, G, von Essen, L. Posttraumatic stress disorder among parents of children on cancer treatment: a longitudinal study. Psychooncology 2008; 17(5): 430–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baenziger, J, Roser, K, Mader, L, Harju, E, Ansari, M, Waespe, N, et al. Post-traumatic stress in parents of long-term childhood cancer survivors compared to parents of the Swiss general population. J Psychosoc Oncol Res Pract 2020; 2(3): e024.Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, MC, Marks, IR, Mulraney, M, Downie, P, Matson, A, De Luca, CR. Parental adjustment following their child's completion of acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68(11): e29302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Gorp, M, Joosten, MMH, Maas, A, Drenth, BL, van der Aa–van Delden, A, Kremer, LCM, et al. Psychosocial functioning of parents of Dutch long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Psychooncology 2023; 32(2): 283–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Herck, Y, Feyaerts, A, Alibhai, S, Papamichael, D, Decoster, L, Lambrechts, Y, et al. Is cancer biology different in older patients? Lancet Healthy Longev 2021; 2(10): e663–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, AR, Stoltzfus, KC, Tchelebi, LT, Trifiletti, DM, Lehrer, EJ, Rao, P, et al. Trends in cancer incidence in US adolescents and young adults, 1973–2015. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(12): e2027738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, AK, Spector, LG, Fortuna, G, Marcotte, EL, Poynter, JN. Trends in international incidence of pediatric cancers in children under 5 years of age: 1988–2012. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2019; 3(1): pkz007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nass, SJ, Beaupin, LK, Demark-Wahnefried, W, Fasciano, K, Ganz, PA, Hayes-Lattin, B, et al. Identifying and addressing the needs of adolescents and young adults with cancer: summary of an institute of medicine workshop. Oncologist 2015; 20(2): 186–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, CE, Loke, S, Pang, GE, Sim, B, Yang, VS. Psychological outcomes in patients with rare cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine 2024; 72: 102631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, CH, Rosner, B, Chen, WY, Kawachi, I, Colditz, GA, Holmes, MD. Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(10): 1849–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albritton, KH, Eden, T. Access to care before and during therapy. In Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults (eds WA Bleyer, RD Barr): 61–9. Springer, 2007.Google Scholar
Walsh, D, Donnelly, S, Rybicki, L. The symptoms of advanced cancer: relationship to age, gender, and performance status in 1,000 patients. Support Care Cancer 2000; 8(3): 175–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brescia, FJ, Portenoy, RK, Ryan, M, Krasnoff, L, Gray, G. Pain, opioid use, and survival in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10(1): 149–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, JJ, Armstrong, K, Bowman, MA, Xie, SX, Kadakia, R, Farrar, JT. Symptom burden among cancer survivors: impact of age and comorbidity. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20(5): 434–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J, Willard, VW, Klosky, JL, Li, C, Srivastava, DK, Robison, LL, et al. Posttraumatic stress-related psychological functioning in adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12(2): 216–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazak, AE, Boeving, CA, Alderfer, MA, Hwang, W-T, Reilly, A. Posttraumatic stress symptoms during treatment in parents of children with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23(30): 7405–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, A, Van Loey, NE, Van Son, MJ, Van der Heijden, PG. Brief report: mothers’ long-term posttraumatic stress symptoms following a burn event of their child. J Pediatr Psychol 2010; 35(6): 656–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millar, MG, Millar, K. The effects of anxiety on response times to disease detection and health promotion behaviors. J Behav Med 1996; 19(4): 401–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, S, Liu, C-Y, Wang, F, Ni, Z-H. Post-traumatic growth among childhood cancer survivors: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 63: 102289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alderfer, MA, Navsaria, N, Kazak, AE. Family functioning and posttraumatic stress disorder in adolescent survivors of childhood cancer. J Fam Psychol 2009; 23(5): 717–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herringa, R, Phillips, M, Almeida, J, Insana, S, Germain, A. Post-traumatic stress symptoms correlate with smaller subgenual cingulate, caudate, and insula volumes in unmedicated combat veterans. Psychiatry Res 2012; 203(2–3): 139–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlman, SB, Pelphrey, KA. Regulatory brain development: balancing emotion and cognition. Soc Neurosci 2010; 5(5–6): 533–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maschi, T, Baer, J, Morrissey, MB, Moreno, C. The aftermath of childhood trauma on late life mental and physical health: a review of the literature. Traumatology 2013; 19(1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seedat, S, Stein, DJ, Carey, PD. Post-traumatic stress disorder in women: epidemiological and treatment issues. CNS Drugs 2005; 19(5): 411–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breslau, N. Gender differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Gend Specif Med 2002; 5(1): 34–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Olff, M, Langeland, W, Draijer, N, Gersons, BP. Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Bull 2007; 133(2): 183–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heck, AL, Handa, RJ. Sex differences in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis’ response to stress: an important role for gonadal hormones. Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 44(1): 45–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morey, RA, Gold, AL, LaBar, KS, Beall, SK, Brown, VM, Haswell, CC, et al. Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69(11): 1169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christov-Moore, L, Simpson, EA, Coudé, G, Grigaityte, K, Iacoboni, M, Ferrari, PF. Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 46(Pt 4): 604–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazak, AE, Barakat, LP, Alderfer, M, Rourke, MT, Meeske, K, Gallagher, PR, et al. Posttraumatic stress in survivors of childhood cancer and mothers: development and validation of the impact of traumatic stressors interview schedule (ITSIS). J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2001; 8(4): 307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, CC, Deatrick, JA. The role of family phenomena in posttraumatic stress in youth. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 2011; 24(1): 38–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charuvastra, A, Cloitre, M. Social bonds and posttraumatic stress disorder. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 301–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilaplana-Pérez, A, Sidorchuk, A, Pérez-Vigil, A, Brander, G, Isoumura, K, Hesselmark, E, et al. Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder and educational achievement in Sweden. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(12): e2028477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Low, CE, Pillay, RM, Teo, FJJ, Loh, CYL, Yau, CE, Yan Bin Lee, AR, et al. Educational interventions to reduce depression and anxiety in older adults with cancer in the community: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials. Age Ageing 2024; 53(6): afae111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, ET, Yu, R, Woo, J. The associations of income, education and income inequality and subjective well-being among elderly in Hong Kong—a multilevel analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(4): 1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, CE, Yau, CE, Tan, RY, Ong, VCS, Ho, RCM, Ho, CSH, et al. Association of depression with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in older adults with cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 10: 101700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, ARYB, Leong, I, Lau, G, Tan, AW, Ho, RCM, Ho, CSH, et al. Depression and anxiety in older adults with cancer: systematic review and meta-summary of risk, protective and exacerbating factors. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2023; 81: 32–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies of paediatric cancer survivors and their family nucleus

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Incidence and risk ratios of post-traumatic stress disorder in paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Survivors refers to studies with a population of paediatric cancer survivors.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms in paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Survivors refers to studies with a population of paediatric cancer survivors. SMD, standardised mean difference.

Figure 4

Table 2 Evaluation of the mediating or confounding effect of the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms among the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Incidence and risk ratios of post-traumatic stress disorder in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Family nucleus refers to studies with a population of family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors.

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Mean severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms in the family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls. Family nucleus refers to studies with a population of family nucleus of paediatric cancer survivors. SMD, standardised mean difference.

Supplementary material: File

Low et al. supplementary material

Low et al. supplementary material
Download Low et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.