Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:50:22.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2021

Jessica Lightfoot
Jessica Lightfoot
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Wonder and the Marvellous from Homer to the Hellenistic World , pp. 228 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. (2012) Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allan, W. (1999–2000) ‘Euripides and the Sophists: Society and the Theatre of War’. ICS 24–5: 145–56.Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. (1997) Word and Concept in Thucydides. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Alonso Troncoso, V. (2013) ‘The Diadochi and the Zoology of Kingship: The Elephants’, in Alonso Troncoso, V. and Anson, E. M. (eds.), After Alexander: The Time of the Diadochi (323–281 BC). Oxford: 254–70.Google Scholar
Amati, M. F. (2010) ‘Meton’s Star-City: Geometry and Utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds’. CJ 105: 213–27.Google Scholar
Angelucci, M. (2014) ‘Water and Paradoxography: Polemon’s Work Περὶ τῶν ἐν Σικελίᾳ θαυμαζομένων ποταμῶν’. OTerr 12: 9–25.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2011) ‘Changing from Within: Plato’s Later Political Thinking’. The Corbett Lecture, University of Cambridge, November 2011. [Unpublished lecture, online]. Available at: www.u.arizona.edu/~jannas/Forthcoming/corbett.pdf [Accessed Sept. 2020].Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2004) ‘Horace’s Epistles 1 and Philodemus’, in Armstrong, D. (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus, and the Augustans. Austin: 267–98.Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, W. (1973) ‘Aristophanes’ Birds: The Fantasy Politics of Eros’. Arion 1: 119–67.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2007) ‘The Wonderful World of Mucianus’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), ‘Vita vigilia est’: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 1–17.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2005) ‘Group Laughter and Comic Affirmation: Aristophanes’ Birds and the Political Function of Old Comedy’. Hyperboreus 11: 5–30.Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Bastianini, G. (2002) Posidippi Pellaei quae supersunt omnia. Milan.Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Olson, S. D. (2004) Aristophanes: Thesmophoriazusae. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, H. C. (1973) ‘Themes in Thucydides’ Account of the Sicilian Expedition’. Hermes 101: 1–13.Google Scholar
Balme, D. M. (1972) Aristotle: De partibus animalium I and De generatione animalium I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Baragwanath, E. (2012) ‘The Wonder of Freedom: Xenophon on Slavery’, in Hobden, F. and Tuplin, C. J. (eds.), Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden: 631–63.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. S. (1964) Hippolytos. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barth, H. (1968) ‘Zur Bewertung und Auswahl des Stoffes durch Herodot’. Klio 50: 93–110.Google Scholar
Bartoňková, D. (1999) ‘Il prosimetrum nella Paradossografia Greca’. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské university 3–4: 63–7.Google Scholar
Beacham, R. (2013) ‘Heron of Alexandria’s “Toy Theatre” Automaton: Reality, Allusion and Illusion’, in Reilly, K. (ed.), Theatre, Performance and Analogue Technology: Historical Interfaces and Intermedialities. Basingstoke: 15–39.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (1992) Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (2007) ‘Situating Nature’s Wonders in Pliny’s Natural History’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), ‘Vita vigilia est’: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 19–40.Google Scholar
Beagon, M. (2011) ‘The Curious Eye of the Elder Pliny’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (eds.), Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts. Leiden: 71–88.Google Scholar
Becker, A. S. (1992) ‘Reading Poetry Through a Distant Lens: Ecphrasis, Ancient Greek Rhetoricians, and the Pseudo-Hesiodic Shield of Heracles’. AJP 113: 5–24.Google Scholar
Becker, A. S. (1995) The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Beekes, R. S. P. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. Leiden.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. S. (1992) ‘Aristotle and Iphigenia’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton: 359–77.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2012) ‘The Sixth Definition (Sophist 226a–231 c): Transposition of Religious Language’, in Bossi, B. and Robinson, T. M. (eds.), Plato’s Sophist Revisited. Berlin and Boston: 41–56.Google Scholar
Berrey, M. (2017) Hellenistic Science at Court. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. A. (2003) ‘Ancient Automata and Mechanical Explanation’. Phronesis 48.4: 344–69.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. A. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bianchi, O and Thévenaz, O. (2004) Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique. Bern.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1995) ‘Ergänzungsspiel in the Epigrams of Callimachus’. A&A 41: 115–31.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2003) ‘The Unruly Tongue: Philitas of Cos as Scholar and Poet’. CP 98.4: 330–48.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2005) ‘The Politics and Poetics of Geography in the Milan Posidippus Section One: On Stones (AB 1–20)’, in Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 119–40.Google Scholar
Bishop, T. (1996) Shakespeare and the Theatre of Wonder. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bobrick, E. (1991) ‘Iphigeneia Revisited: Thesmophoriazusae 1160–1225’. Arethusa 24: 67–76.Google Scholar
Bolton, J. D. P. (1962) Aristeas of Proconnesus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowe, G. S. (2017) ‘Thaumata in Aristotle’s Metaphysics A’. Acta Classica 60: 50–72.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. J. (1998) Xenophon: Symposium. Warminster.Google Scholar
Bowie, A. M. (1993) Aristophanes: Myth, Ritual, and Comedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. (2012) ‘A Science of First Principles Metaphysics A 2’, in Steel, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, V. J. (1977) Form and Colour in Greek Painting: A Study of the Colour Harmonies and Shading Techniques Used by the Major Painters of Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Revisiting Plato’s Cave’, in Cleary, J. J. and Gurtler, G. M. (eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 19. Leiden: 145–77.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2019) ‘Dare to Believe: Wonder, Trust and the Limitations of Human Cognition in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Braund, D., Hall, E. and Wyles, R. (eds.), Ancient Theatre and Performance Culture Around the Black Sea. Cambridge: 289–304.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. L. (1986) Studia Pindarica. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Buonajuto, A. (1996) ‘L’ἐξωκεανισμός dei viaggi di Odisseo in Cratete e negli Alessandrini’. A&R 41: 1–8.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1983) Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by Peter Bing. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burnett, A. P. (1971) Catastrophe Survived: Euripides’ Plays of Mixed Reversal. Oxford.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1999) ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. Tanner Lectures on Human Values 20: 215–324.Google Scholar
Burstein, S. M. (1989) Agatharchides of Cnidus: On the Erythraean Sea. London.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1996) Thésée et l’imaginaire athénien: légende et culte en Grèce antique. Lausanne.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (1994) ‘Automaton’. StudStor 35: 613–33.Google Scholar
Cambiano, G. (2012) ‘The Desire to Know Metaphysics A 1’, in Steel, C. and Primavesi, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: 1–42.Google Scholar
Cambitoglou, A. and Turner, M. (eds.) (2008) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Australia [Fasc. 1]. The Nicholson Museum, The University of Sydney: The Red Figure Pottery of Apulia. Sydney.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. B. (1999) Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Cappelletto, C. (2011) ‘The Puppet’s Paradox: An Organic Prosthesis’. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 59/60: 325–36.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Casadesús Bordoy, F. (2012) ‘Why Is it So Difficult to Catch a Sophist? Pl. Sph. 218d3 and 261a5’, in Bossi, B. and Robinson, T. M. (eds.), Plato’s Sophist Revisited. Berlin and Boston: 15–27.Google Scholar
Càssola, F. (1975) Inni omerici. Milan.Google Scholar
Casson, L. (1993) ‘Ptolemy II and the Hunting of African Elephants’. TAPA 123: 247–60.Google Scholar
Cave, T. (1988) Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. (2018) Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (1992) ‘Plato’s First Words’. YCS 29: 113–29.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2006) The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Coleridge, S. T. (1817) Biographia Literaria. London.Google Scholar
Collard, C. and Cropp, M. (2008) Euripides, Fragments: Aegeus-Meleager. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Conacher, D. J. (1998) Euripides and the Sophists: Some Dramatic Treatments of Philosophical Ideas. London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1907) Thucydides Mythistoricus. London.Google Scholar
Cozzoli, A.-T. (2011) ‘The Poet as a Child’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: 407–28.Google Scholar
Cropp, M. J. (1997) ‘Notes on Euripides, Iphigenia in Tauris’. ICS 22: 25–41.Google Scholar
Cropp, M. J. (2000) Euripides: Iphigenia in Tauris. Warminster.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. (2003) ‘The Dolphins of Dionysus’, in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.), Poetry, Theory, Praxis: The Social Life of Myth, Word and Image in Ancient Greece. Essays in Honour of William J. Slater. Oxford: 69–98.Google Scholar
Csapo, E. and Miler, M. C. (2007) ‘General Introduction’, in Csapo, E. and Miller, M. C. (eds.), The Origins of Theater in Ancient Greece and Beyond: From Ritual to Drama. Cambridge: 1–38.Google Scholar
Cunningham, V. (2007) ‘Why Ekphrasis?’ CP 102: 57–71.Google Scholar
Cursaru, G. (2012) ‘Les sandales d’Hermès III: enquête sur les traces des σάνδαλα dans l’Hymne homérique à Hermès’. Mouseion 12: 17–50.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. (2013) ‘“The Name of the Dithyramb”: Diachronic and Diatopic Variations’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 113–32.Google Scholar
Danek, G. (2001) ‘Das Staunen des Chores: Götter und Menschen im Ion des Euripides’. WS 114: 47–58.Google Scholar
D’Angour, A. (2011) The Greeks and the New: Novelty in Ancient Greek Imagination and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Danzig, G. (2013) ‘Plato’s Charmides as a Political Act: Apologetics and the Promotion of Ideology’. GRBS 53.3: 486–519.Google Scholar
Danzig, G. (2014) ‘The Use and Abuse of Critias: Conflicting Portraits in Plato and Xenophon’. CQ 64: 507–24.Google Scholar
Daston, L. and Park, K. (1998) Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1998) ‘Euripides’ Electra: The Recognition Scene Again’. CQ 48: 389–403.Google Scholar
Dearden, C. W. (1995) ‘Pots, Tumblers and Phlyax Vases’, in Griffiths, A. (ed.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E. W. Handley. London: 81–6.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, D. (2016) ‘The Meeting Scenes in the Incipit of Plato’s Dialogue’, in Cornelli, G. (ed.), Plato’s Styles and Characters: Between Literature and Philosophy. Berlin: 119–35.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1994) The Gardens of Adonis: Spices in Greek Mythology. Princeton.Google Scholar
Dettori, E. (2000) Filita grammatico: testimonianze e frammenti. Rome.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. (2001a) ‘Mimes, Thaumaturgy, and the Theatre’. CQ 51: 599–603.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. (2001b) Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World. London.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1951–2) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 3 vols. 6th ed. Berlin.Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (1981a) Euripides: Fabulae, II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (1981b) Studies on the Text of Euripides: Supplices, Electra, Heracles, Troades, Iphigenia in Tauris, Ion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dobrov, G. W. (1997) ‘Language, Fiction, and Utopia’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 95–132.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1999) Antigone de Caryste: Fragments. Paris.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2005) ‘Accessioni a Antigono di Caristo’. SCO 51: 119–33.Google Scholar
Dunbar, N. (1995) Aristophanes: Birds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dunn, F. M. (2017) ‘Euripides and His Intellectual Context’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 447–67.Google Scholar
Edgar, C. C. (1925) Zenon Papyri: Catalogue général des antiquités égyptiennes du Musée du Caire, Vol. 1: (Cat. 79). Cairo.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. (1991) The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 5. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2014) ‘Lithic Poetics: Posidippus and His Stones’. Ramus 43.2: 152–72.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (1995) ‘Culture and Power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and Library of Alexandria’. G&R 42: 38–48.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W. and Marr, A. (eds.) (2006) Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Faraone, C. A. (1987) ‘Hephaestus the Magician and Near Eastern Parallels for Alcinous’ Watchdogs’. GRBS 28: 257–80.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011) ‘The Collection of the Homeric Hymns: From the Seventh to the Third Centuries BC’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 175–205.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2007) Bacchylides: Politics, Performance, Poetic Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2017) Pindar’s Eyes: Visual and Material Culture in Epinician Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. K. (1995) ‘The Concept of Miracle in Homer’. Antichthon 29: 1–14.Google Scholar
Flashar, H. (1972) Aristoteles: Mirabilia. Berlin.Google Scholar
Flores, S. O. (2018) ‘The Development of Critias in Plato’s Dialogues’. CP 113: 162–88.Google Scholar
Folch, M. (2013) ‘Unideal Genres and the Ideal City: Comedy, Threnody, and the Making of Citizens in Plato’s Laws’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: 339–67.Google Scholar
Folch, M. (2015) The City and the Stage: Performance, Genre, and Gender in Plato’s Laws. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ford, A. L. (1992) Homer: The Poetry of the Past. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ford, A. L. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fornara, C.W. (1971) ‘Evidence for the Date of Herodotus’ Publication’. JHS 91: 25–34.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1972a) Ptolemaic Alexandria, Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1972b) Ptolemaic Alexandria, Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2010) ‘Puppets on Strings: Moral Psychology in Laws Books 1 and 2’, in Bobonich, C. (ed.), Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: 108–26.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1981) ‘True and False History in Classical Antiquity’. JRS 71: 50–62.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. and Greenblatt, S. (2000) Practicing New Historicism. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gerolemou, M. (2018) Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Giannini, A. (1963) ‘Studi sulla paradossografia greca, I: Da Omero a Caliimaco, motivi e forme del meraviglioso’. RIL XCVII: 247–66.Google Scholar
Giannini, A. (1964) ‘Studi sulla paradossografia greca, II: Da Callimaco all’età imperial: la letteratura paradossografica’. Acme 17: 99–140.Google Scholar
Giannini, A. (1966) Paradoxographorum Graecorum reliquiae. Milan.Google Scholar
Gibert, J. C. (2019) Euripides: Ion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gilhuly, K. (2009) The Feminine Matrix of Sex and Gender in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. (1981) ‘Who’s Afraid of Rope-Walkers and Gladiators? (Terence, Hec. 1–57)’. Athenaeum 59: 29–37.Google Scholar
Gilula, D. (2002) ‘Entertainment at Xenophon’s Symposium’. Athenaeum 90.1: 207–13.Google Scholar
Giraud, M. H. (1987) ‘Les Oiseaux dans l’Ion d’Euripide’. RPh 61: 83–94.Google Scholar
Gocer, A. (1999) ‘The Puppet Theater in Plato’s Parable of the Cave’. CJ 95.2: 119–29.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2013) Terence: Hecyra. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, F. J. (2003) ‘How to Read a Platonic Prologue: Lysis 203A–207D’, in Michelini, A. N. (ed.) Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2013) The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (2012) Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus. London.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. (1954) ‘Asclepiades and Posidippus: Notes and Queries’. CR 68: 195–200.Google Scholar
Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. (1965) The Greek Anthology: Hellenistic Epigrams, Vol. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2012) Horace: Satires Book 1. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. (2001) ‘Herodotus’ Literary and Historical Method: Arion’s Story (1.23–24)’. AJP 122: 11–28.Google Scholar
Green, P. (1970) Armada from Athens. New York.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1990) ‘Resonance and Wonder’. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 43.4: 11–34.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, S. (1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Grenfell, B. P. and Hunt, A. S. (1899) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar
Griffiths, E. M. (2017) ‘Ion: An Edible Fairy Tale?’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 228–42.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2009) Nox Philologiae: Aulus Gellius and the Fantasy of the Roman Library. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1986) ‘The Plant Decoration on Theocritus’ Ivy-Cup’. AJP 107: 253–5.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2002) ‘Art’s Echo: The Tradition of Hellenistic Ecphrastic Epigram’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Hellenistic Epigrams. Groningen: 85–112.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2007) A Guide to Hellenistic Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1990) ‘Sacrifice, Society, and Vergil’s Ox-Born Bees’, in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta: 209–23.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1987) ‘The Geography of Euripides’ Iphigenia among the Taurians’. AJP 108: 427–33.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989) ‘The Archer Scene in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae’. Philologus 133: 38–54.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2012) Adventures with Iphigenia in Tauris: A Cultural History of Euripides’ Black Sea Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (2020) ‘Aristophanes’ Birds as Satire on Athenian Opportunists in Thrace’, in Rosen, R. M. and Foley, H. P. (eds.), Aristophanes and Politics: New Studies. Leiden: 187–213.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1986) Aristotle’s Poetics. London.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1987) The Poetics of Aristotle. London.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hansen, W. (1996) Phlegon of Tralles’ Book of Marvels. Exeter.Google Scholar
Harb, L. (2020) Arabic Poetics: Aesthetic Experience in Classical Arabic Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (2012) Callimachus: Aetia, Vols. 1 and 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2009) Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (2007) ‘Language in the Cave’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 195–215.Google Scholar
Hartigan, K. (1991) Ambiguity and Self Deception: The Apollo and Artemis Plays of Euripides. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (1980) Le miroir d’Hérodote: essai sur la représentation de l’autre. Paris.Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hauben, H. (1984–6) ‘Onagres et hémionagres en Transjordanie au IIIᵉ s. av. J. C. À propos d’une lettre de Toubias’. AncSoc 15–17: 89–111.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2011) ‘Bild, Mythos, and Ritual: Choral Dance in Theseus’s Cretan Adventure on the François Vase’. Hesperia 80: 491–510.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2013) ‘The Semantics of Processional Dithyramb: Pindar’s Second Dithyramb and Archaic Athenian Vase-Painting’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 171–97.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (1998) ‘The Simile of the Fugitive Homicide, Iliad 24.480–84: Analogy, Foiling and Allusion’. AJP 119: 1–10.Google Scholar
Herington, J. (1985) Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hersey, G. L. (2009) Falling in Love with Statues: Artificial Humans from Pygmalion to the Present. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hilton, J. L. (2011) ‘On Isopsephic Lines in Homer and Apollonius of Rhodes’. CJ 106.4: 385–94.Google Scholar
Hilton, J. L. (2013) ‘The Hunt for Acrostics by Some Ancient Readers of Homer’. Hermes 141.1: 88–95.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, A. (1989) ‘Books XIII–XVI’, in Heubeck, A. and Hoekstra, A. (eds.), A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, II: Books IX–XVI. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoffer, S. E. (1996) ‘Violence, Culture, and the Workings of Ideology in Euripides’ Ion’. ClAnt 15: 289–318.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (1982) ‘Fact and Fiction in Aulus Gellius’. LCM VII: 65–68.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L. (1988) Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. London.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2002) The Greek World, 479–323 BC. 3rd ed. London.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2004) Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2008) A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. 3: Books 5.25–8.109. Oxford.Google Scholar
Howie, J. G. (1983) ‘The Revision of Myth in Pindar Olympian 1: The Death and Revival of Pelops (25–27, 36–66)’, reprinted in Howie, J. G. (2012) Exemplum and Myth, Criticism and Creation: Papers on Early Greek Literature. Prenton: 161–90.Google Scholar
Howley, J. A. (2018) Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge in the Noctes Atticae. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1997) ‘Utopianism and the Sophistic City in Aristophanes’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 23–50.Google Scholar
Hubbell, H. M. (1935) ‘Ptolemy’s Zoo’. CJ 31: 68–76.Google Scholar
Hughes, A. (2008) ‘Αἱ Διονυσιάζουσαι: Women in Greek Theatre’. BICS 51: 1–27.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1992) ‘Callimachus and Heraclitus’. MD 28: 113–23.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1999) Theocritus: A Selection. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, V. (1986) ‘Thucydides, Gorgias, and Mass Psychology’. Hermes 114: 412–29.Google Scholar
Hunzinger, C. (1993) ‘L’étonnement et l’émerveillement chez Homère: les mots de la famille de thauma’. Revue des Etudes Grecques 106: 17–9.Google Scholar
Hunzinger, C. (1995). ‘La notion de θῶμα chez Hérodote’. Ktèma 20: 47–70.Google Scholar
Hunzinger, C. (2015) ‘Wonder’, in Destrée, P. and Murray, P. (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Aesthetics. Chichester: 422–37.Google Scholar
Hunzinger, C. (2018) ‘Perceiving Thauma in Archaic Greek Epic’, in Gerolemou, M. (ed.), Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston: 259–73.Google Scholar
Huss, B. (1997) ‘In Xenophontis Symposium obseruatiunculae criticae’. ICS 22: 43–50.Google Scholar
Huss, B. (1999) Xenophons Symposion: ein Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1988) Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (1983) ‘De l’art de compiler à la fabrication du merveilleux. Sur la paradoxographie grecque’. LALIES 2: 121–40.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (2000) ‘Athenaeus the Librarian’, in Braund, D. C. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 85–110.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (2013a) ‘Fragments of a History of Ancient Libraries’, in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 57–81.Google Scholar
Jacob, C. (2013b) The Web of Athenaeus. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotos’. RE Suppl. 2: 205–520.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. (1998) ‘Dramatic Frame and Philosophic Idea in Plato’. AJP 119.4: 577–98.Google Scholar
Johnstone, S. (2014) ‘A New History of Libraries and Books in the Hellenistic Period’. ClAnt 33: 347–93.Google Scholar
Joho, T. (2017) ‘The Revival of the Funeral Oration and the Plague in Thucydides Books 6–7’. GRBS 57.1: 16–48.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1991) ‘Dinner Theater’, in Slater, W. J. (ed.), Dining in a Classical Context. Ann Arbor: 185–98.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (2000) ‘The Sicilian Expedition Was a Potemkin Fleet’. CQ 50: 63–79.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. R. (2006) ‘Patterns and Laughter in Euripides’ Helen’. Symbolae Osloenses 81: 6–28.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. (1992) ‘Le statut du thauma chez les médecins de la Collection hippocratique’, in Thivel, A. (ed.), Le miracle grec. Paris: 223–36.Google Scholar
Kahn, L. (1978) Hermès passe ou les ambiguïtés de la communication. Paris.Google Scholar
Kaklamanou, E. and Pavlou, M. (2016) ‘Reading the Proemium of Plato’s Theaetetus: Euclides in Action’. GRBS 56: 410–37.Google Scholar
Kallet, L. (2001) Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and Its Aftermath. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. (2004) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, Vol. 5.1: Euripides. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Karasmanis, V. (1988) ‘Plato’s Republic: The Line and the Cave’. Apeiron 21: 147–71.Google Scholar
Kareem, S. T. (2014) Eighteenth-Century Fiction and the Reinvention of Wonder. Oxford.Google Scholar
Karttunen, K. (2002) ‘The Ethnography of the Fringes’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus. Leiden: 457–74.Google Scholar
Kazantzidis, G. (2019) ‘Introduction: Medicine and Paradoxography in Dialogue’, in Kazantzidis, G. (ed.), Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 1–40.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1991) Aristotle On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kenny, N. (1998) Curiosity in Early Modern Europe: Word Histories. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kenny, N. (2004) The Uses of Curiosity in Early Modern France and Germany. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kenny, N. (2006) ‘The Metaphorical Collecting of Curiosities in Early Modern France and Germany’, in Evans, R. J. W. and Marr, A. (eds.), Curiosity and Wonder from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Aldershot: 43–62.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. (2004) ‘Gellius, Apuleius, and Satire on the Intellectual’, in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford: 224–44.Google Scholar
Keulen, W. (2009) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights. Leiden.Google Scholar
Keuls, E. (1978) Plato and Greek Painting. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kitchell, K. F. (1989) ‘The Origin of Vergil’s Myth of the Bugonia’, in Sutton, R. F. (ed.), Daidalikon: Studies in Memory of Raymond V. Schoder. Wauconda: 193–206.Google Scholar
Klimek-Winter, R. (1993) Andromedatragödien: Sophokles, Euripides, Livius Andronikos, Ennius, Accius. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 1–31.Google Scholar
König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and Coherence in Plutarch’s Sympotic Questions’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: 43–68.Google Scholar
König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.) (2007) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1997) ‘The Greek Polis and Its Negations: Versions of Utopia in Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 3–22.Google Scholar
Kosak, J. C. (2006) ‘The Wall in Aristophanes’ Birds’, in Rosen, R. M and Sluiter, I. (eds.), City, Countryside, and the Spatial Organization of Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 173–80.Google Scholar
Kosak, J. C (2017) ‘Iphigenia in Tauris’, in McClure, L. K. (ed.), A Companion to Euripides. Chichester: 214–27.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2013) ‘Dancing Dolphins: Dithyramb and Society in the Archaic Period’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in Context. Oxford: 31–58.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (2004) ‘Callimachus and the Pedestrian Muse’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus II. Groningen: 173–84.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (2005) ‘The Editor’s Toolbox: Strategies for Selection and Presentation in the Milan Epigram Papyrus’, in Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 81–96.Google Scholar
Krevans, N. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ Philology’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: 118–33.Google Scholar
Kroll, W. (1935) ‘Θαυματοποιοί’. RE Suppl. VI: 1278–82.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2012) ‘The Value of Chorality in Ancient Greece’, in Papadopoulos, J. K. and Urton, G. (eds.), The Construction of Value in the Ancient World. Los Angeles: 218–35.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2013) ‘Imagining Chorality: Wonder, Plato’s Puppets, and Moving Statues’, in Peponi, A.-E. (ed.), Performance and Culture in Plato’s Laws. Cambridge: 123–70.Google Scholar
Kyriakou, P. (2006) A Commentary on Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kyselý, R. (2010) ‘Breed Character or Pathology? Cattle with Loose Horns from the Eneolithic Site of Hostivice–Litovice (Czech Republic)’. Journal of Archaeological Science 37: 1241–46.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2004) ‘Authorial Voice and Theatrical Self-Definition in Terence and Beyond: The Hecyra Prologues in Ancient and Modern Contexts’. G&R 51.1: 55–82.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2007) Silent Eloquence: Lucian and Pantomime Dancing. London.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Most, G. W. (eds) (2016) Early Greek Philosophy. 9 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lämmle, R. (2013) Poetik des Satyrspiels. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lämmle, R. (2019) ‘Precarious Choreia in Satyr Play’. BICS 62.2: 29–48.Google Scholar
Lather, A. (2017) ‘The Sound of Music: The Semantics of Noise in Early Greek Hexameter’. Greek and Roman Musical Studies 5: 127–46.Google Scholar
Lebrère, M. (2015) ‘L’artialisation des sons de la nature dans les sanctuaires à automates d’Alexandrie, du IIIe s. av. J.-C. au Ier s. apr. J.-C.’. Pallas 98: 31–53.Google Scholar
Lee, K. (1997) Euripides: Ion. Warminster.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (2013) From Polypragmon to Curiosus: Ancient Concepts of Curious and Meddlesome Behaviour. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J. (1965) Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2001) Aristotle: On the Parts of Animals. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. (2019a) ‘Galen’s Language of Wonder: Thauma, Medicine and Philosophy in On Prognosis and On Affected Parts’, in Kazantzidis, G. (ed.), Medicine and Paradoxography in the Ancient World. Berlin and Boston: 163–82.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. (2019b) ‘Textual Wanderings: Homeric Scholarship and the Written Landscape of Strabo’s Geography’. AJP 140.4: 671–97.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2002) ‘Nothing to Do with the τεχνῖται of Dionysus?’, in Easterling, P. E. and Hall, E. (eds.), Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: 209–24.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2009) Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lindermann, J.-O. (2006) Aulus Gellius Noctes Atticae, Buch 9: Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, J. (1988) ‘On the Saying that Philosophy Begins in Thaumazein’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.), Post-Structuralist Classics. London: 173–91.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1996) Sophocles: Fragments. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parsons, P. (1983) Supplementum Hellenisticum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, S. H. (1993) Dance and Ritual Play in Greek Religion. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1986) The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (1990) ‘Kreousa the Autochthon: A Study of Euripides’ Ion’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton: 168–206.Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. (1968) Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Luz, C. (2010) Technopaignia, Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung. Leiden.Google Scholar
Maass, E. (1892) Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae. Berlin.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1982) Iliad: Book XXIV. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1983) Collected Essays. Oxford.Google Scholar
Manakidou, F. P. (2012) ‘Philitas, Theocritus, and Thorny Plants: A Reconsideration of Their Relationship’. Prometheus 1: 107–27.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2000) ‘Female Performers on Stage? (PhV 96 [RVP 2/33])’. Text and Presentation 21: 13–25.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2003) ‘Sophocles’ Nauplius and Heron of Alexandria’s Mechanical Theatre’, in Sommerstein, A. H. (ed.), Shards from Kolonos: Studies in Sophoclean Fragments. Bari: 261–79.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2009) ‘Sophocles’ Chryses and the Date of Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Cousland, J. R. C. and Hume, J. R. (eds.), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp. Leiden: 141–56.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2014) The Structure and Performance of Euripides’ Helen. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martin, G. (2018) Euripides, Ion. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Martin, J. (1974) Scholia in Aratum Vetera. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (2005) ‘Pulp Epic: The Catalogue and the Shield’, in Hunter, R. L. (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge: 153–75.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (1994) Horace: Epistles, Book I. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McAvoy, M. (1996) ‘Carnal Knowledge in the Charmides’. Apeiron 29: 63–103.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (2007) ‘Looking Inside Charmides’ Cloak: Seeing Others and Oneself in Plato’s Charmides’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 1–19.Google Scholar
McCarter, S. A. (2015) Horace between Freedom and Slavery: The First Book of Epistles. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. B. (2008) Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. B. (2009) ‘Alcidamas, Isocrates, and Plato on Speech, Writing, and Philosophical Rhetoric’. AncPhil 29: 45–66.Google Scholar
McPhee, B. D. (2017) ‘Apollo, Dionysus, and the Multivalent Birds of Euripides’ Ion’. CW 110.4: 475–89.Google Scholar
Mette, H. J. (1960) ‘“Schauen” und “Staunen”’. Glotta 39: 49–71.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. (2007) ‘The Act of Reading and the Act of Writing in Hellenistic Epigram’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Hellenistic Epigram. Leiden: 187–210.Google Scholar
Meyer, S. S. (2015) Plato Laws 1 and 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Milanezi, S. (2004) ‘À l’ombre des acteurs: les amuseurs à l’époque classique’, in Hugoniot, C., Hurlet, F. and Milanezi, S. (eds.), Le statut de l’acteur dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine. Tours: 183–209.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. S. (2012) ‘Dionysius I and Sicilian Theatrical Traditions in Plato’s Republic: Representing Continuities Between Democracy and Tyranny’, in Bosher, K. (ed.), Theater Outside Athens: Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy. Cambridge: 156–72.Google Scholar
Moore, K. (2014) ‘Plato’s Puppets of the Gods: Representing the Magical, the Mystical and the Metaphysical’. Arion 22.2: 37–72.Google Scholar
Moran, R. (1996) ‘Artifice and Persuasion: The Work of Metaphor in the Rhetoric’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley: 385–98.Google Scholar
Morgan, K. A. (2012) ‘A Prolegomenon to Performance in the West’, in Bosher, K. (ed.), Theater Outside Athens: Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy. Cambridge: 35–55.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. (1999) Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s Georgics. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. J. (2011) ‘The Miscellany and Plutarch’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 49–73.Google Scholar
Morris, S. P. (1992) Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. (1981) Aristophanic Poetry. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Muir, J. V. (2001) Alcidamas: The Works and Fragments. London.Google Scholar
Munson, R. V. (2001) Telling Wonders: Ethnographic and Political Discourse in the Work of Herodotus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. (1995) ‘Heron of Alexandria’s On Automaton-Making’. HTechn 17: 1–44.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. M. (2004) Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Musso, O. (1976) ‘Sulla struttura del cod. Pal. gr. 398 e deduzioni storico-letterarie’. Prometheus 2: 1–10.Google Scholar
Musso, O. (1977) Michele Psello: Nozioni paradossali. Naples.Google Scholar
Musso, O. (1985) [Antigonus Carystius]: Rerum mirabilium collectio. Naples.Google Scholar
Nails, D. (2002) The People of Plato: A Prosopography of Plato and Other Socratics. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Naas, V. (2004) ‘Opera mirabilia in terris et Romae operum miracula dans l’Histoire naturelle de Pline l’Ancien’, in Bianchi, O and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique. Bern: 253–64.Google Scholar
Naas, V. (2011) ‘Imperialism, Mirabilia and Knowledge: Some Paradoxes in the Naturalis Historia’, in Gibson, R. K. and Morello, R. (eds.), Pliny the Elder: Themes and Contexts. Leiden: 57–70.Google Scholar
Neer, R. T. (2010) The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.Google Scholar
Neer, R. T. and Kurke, L. (2019) Pindar, Song, and Space: Towards a Lyric Archaeology. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Nenci, G. (1957/8) ‘La concezione del miracoloso nei poemi omerici’. AAT XCII: 275–311.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H-G. (2014) ‘Ancient Comedy and Historiography: Aristophanes Meets Herodotus’, in Olson, S. D. (ed.), Ancient Comedy and Reception: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Henderson. Berlin and Boston: 51–61.Google Scholar
Nichols, A. (2018) ‘Ctesias’ Indica and the Origins of Paradoxography’, in Gerolemou, M. (ed.), Recognizing Miracles in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin and Boston: 3–16.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2002) ‘Distant Views: “Realistic” and “Fantastic” Mimesis in Plato’, in Annas, J. and Rowe, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Plato, Modern and Ancient. Cambridge, MA: 227–48.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2004) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy: Theoria in Its Cultural Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014) Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J. (1988) ‘Pelopid History and the Plot of Iphigenia in Tauris’. CQ 38: 98–115.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. (2017) ‘The Fantastic Phaeacians: Dance and Disruption in the Odyssey’. ClAnt 36: 1–32.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. and Sens, A. (1999) Matro of Pitane and the Tradition of Epic Parody in the Fourth Century BCE: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, F. (2006) ‘Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Metaphor’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 21.1: 155–90.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992) Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Packman, Z. M. (1991) ‘The Incredible and the Incredulous: The Vocabulary of Disbelief in Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon’. Hermes 119: 399–414.Google Scholar
Padel, R. (1974) ‘Imagery of the Elsewhere: Two Choral Odes of Euripides’. CQ 24: 227–41.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (1981) Further Greek Epigrams. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pajón Leyra, I. (2011) Entre ciencia y maravilla: el género literario de la paradoxografía griega. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Pajón Leyra, I. (2014) ‘Little Horror Stories in an Oxyrhynchus Papyrus: A Re-edition and Commentary of P. Oxy. II 218’. APF 60: 304–30.Google Scholar
Pajón Leyra, I. and Sánchez Muñoz, L. (2015) ‘The Magnetic Stone of Posidippus’ Poem Nr. 17: The Earliest Description of Magnetic Polarity in Hellenistic Egypt’. ZPE 195: 30–7.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1996) ‘Plautus vs. Terence: Audience and Popularity Re-examined’. AJP 117.4: 585–617.Google Scholar
Parker, L. P. E. (1997) The Songs of Aristophanes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, L. P. E. (2016) Euripides: Iphigenia in Tauris. Oxford.Google Scholar
Passmore, O. (2018) ‘Thaumastic Acoustics: Typhoeus and “Ty-phonics” in Pindar, Pythian 1.26 and Hesiod, Theogony 834’. Mnemosyne 71.5: 733–49.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. (2012) ‘Bacchylides 17: Singing and Usurping the Paean’. GRBS 52.4: 510–39.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1997) ‘East Is East and West Is West – Or Are They? National Stereotypes in Herodotus’. Histos 1: 51–66.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R (2000a) ‘Fun with Fragments: Athenaeus and the Historians’, in Braund, D. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 171–90.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R (2000b) Literary Texts and the Greek Historian. London.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2016) ‘Herodotus’ Persian Stories: Narrative Shape and Historical Interpretation’. Syllecta Classica 27: 65–92.Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. (2009) ‘Χορεία and Aesthetics in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo: The Performance of the Delian Maidens (Lines 156–64)’. ClAnt 28: 39–70.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1949) Callimachus, Vol. 1: Fragmenta. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platnauer, M. (1938) Iphigenia in Tauris. OxfordGoogle Scholar
Platt, P. G. (1997) Reason Diminished: Shakespeare and the Marvelous. Lincoln.Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011) Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature, and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1992) ‘Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the Exegesis of Homer’, in Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Princeton: 67–114.Google Scholar
Poulakos, J. and Crick, N. (2012) ‘There is Beauty Here, Too: Aristotle’s Rhetoric for Science’. Ph&Rh 45.3: 295–311.Google Scholar
Power, T. (2010) The Culture of Kitharôidia. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Power, T. (2011) ‘Cyberchorus: Pindar’s Κηληδόνες and the Aura of the Artificial’, in Athanassaki, L. and Bowie, E. (eds.), Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination. Berlin: 67–113.Google Scholar
Prier, R. A. (1989) Thauma Idesthai: The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek. Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Priestley, J. (2014) Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. (2009) ‘On the Oddities and Wonders of Italy: When Poets Look Westward’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. (eds.), Nature and Science in Hellenistic Poetry. Leuven: 121–48.Google Scholar
Pulitani, G., Caldana, I., Busato, R., Schiavon, F., Conti, G., Rampazzo, E. and Vidale, M. (2017) ‘Performances of (and on) Greek Potter’s Wheels: An Experimental Project’. Eidola 14: 35–56.Google Scholar
Race, W. H. (1988) Classical Genres and English Poetry. London.Google Scholar
Radt, S. (1999) Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, Vol. 4: Sophocles. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. (1985) ‘Herodotus the Tourist’. CP 90: 97–118.Google Scholar
Reece, A. S. (1998) ‘Drama, Narrative, and Socratic Eros in Plato’s Charmides’. Interpretation 26: 65–76.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. R. (2006) ‘A Study in Violets: Alcibiades in the Symposium’, in Lesher, J. H., Nails, D. and Sheffield, F. C. C. (eds.), Plato’s Symposium: Issues in Interpretation and Reception. Cambridge, MA: 124–46.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1960) Tradition und Geist: Gesammelte Essays zur Dichtung. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Rice, E. E. (1983) The Grand Procession of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1993) The Iliad: A Commentary, Vol. 6. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (2010) Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes and Aphrodite. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robert, L. (1929) ‘Epigraphica VIII: au théâtre de Delphes’. REG 42.198: 427–38.Google Scholar
Roby, C. (2016) Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rocco, A. (1954) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum, Italia 24: Napoli, Museo Nazionale 3. Rome.Google Scholar
Rogkotis, Z. (2006) ‘Thucydides and Herodotus: Aspects of Their Intertextual Relationship’, in Rengakos, A. and Tsakmakis, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Thucydides. Leiden: 57–86.Google Scholar
Romm, J. S. (1992) The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought: Geography, Exploration, and Fiction. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ronca, I. (1992) ‘Semper Aliquid Novi Africam Adferre: Philological Afterthoughts on the Plinian Reception of a Pre-Aristotelian Saying’. Akroterion 37: 146–58.Google Scholar
Rood, T. (1998) Thucydides: Narrative and Explanation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rood, T. (1999) ‘Thucydides’ Persian Wars’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden: 141–68.Google Scholar
Rood, T. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Foreign Lands’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus. Cambridge: 290–305.Google Scholar
Rothwell, K. S. (2007) Nature, Culture, and the Origins of Greek Comedy: A Study of Animal Choruses. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1989) Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (Vᵉ siècle av. J. C.–Iᵉʳ siècle ap. J. C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1993) ‘Horace as a Moralist’, in Rudd, N. (ed.), Horace 2000: A Celebration – Essays for the Bimillennium. Ann Arbor: 64–88.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G. (2002) ‘Dramatic Prefiguration in Plato’s Republic’. Ph&Lit 26: 75–83.Google Scholar
Rusten, J. (2013) ‘The Mirror of Aristophanes: The Winged Ethnographers of Birds (1470–93, 1553–64, 1694–1705)’, in Bakola, E., Prauscello, L. and Telò, M. (eds.), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge: 298–315.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. (1982) ‘Tragic Form and Feeling in the Iliad’. JHS 102: 145–60.Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1982) ‘How Terence’s Hecyra Failed’. CQ 32.1: 134–5.Google Scholar
Sansone, D. (1975) ‘The Sacrifice-Motif in Euripides’ IT’. TAPA 105: 283–95.Google Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2000) Filita: testimonianze e frammenti poetici. Rome.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. F. (1994) ‘Echoes of Herodotus in Thucydides: Self-Sufficiency, Admiration, and Law’. Historia 43: 143–76.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, D. (1999) ‘Wisdom and Wonder in Metaphysics Α: 1–2’. The Review of Metaphysics 52.3: 641–56.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (1997) Unterhaltung beim griechischen Symposion: Darbietungen, Spiele und Wettkämpfe von homerischer bis in spätklassische Zeit. Mainz.Google Scholar
Schepens, G. and Delcroix, K. (1996) ‘Ancient Paradoxography: Origin, Evolution, Production and Reception’, in Pecere, O. and Stramaglia, A. (eds.), La letteratura di consumo nel mondo greco-latino. Cassino: 373–460.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. and Stählin, O. (1920–4) Geschichte der griechischen Literatur. Munich.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2007) ‘Metaspeleology’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays on Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 216–31.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2016) ‘Plato’s Marionette’. Rhizomata 4.2: 128–53.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (1996) ‘Δόμων ἄγαλμα: Virgin Sacrifice and Aesthetic Object’. TAPA 126: 111–28.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. (1974) The Elephant in the Greek and Roman World. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Segvic, H. (2006) ‘Homer in Plato’s Protagoras’. CP 101: 247–62.Google Scholar
Shannon-Henderson, K. E. (2020) ‘Constructing a New Imperial Paradoxography: Phlegon of Tralles and His Sources’, in König, A., Langlands, R. and Uden, J. (eds.), Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge: 159–78.Google Scholar
Shelmerdine, S. C. (1981) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: A Commentary (1–114) with Introduction. PhD thesis, University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Shershow, S. C. (1995) Puppets and ‘Popular’ Culture. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1916) ‘Art as Technique’, translated in Lemon, L. T. and Reis, M. J. (eds.) (1965) Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln: 3–24.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W (1997) ‘Performing the City in Birds’, in Dobrov, G. W. (ed.), The City as Comedy: Society and Representation in Athenian Drama. Chapel Hill, NC: 75–94.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. (2000) ‘Religion and Identity in Pacuvius’s Chryses’, in Manuwald, G. (ed.), Identität und Alterität in der frührömischen Tragödie. Würzburg: 315–23.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. (2004) ‘Where Are the Actors?’, in Hugoniot, C., Hurlet, F. and Milanezi, S. (eds.), Le statut de l’acteur dans l’Antiquité grecque et romaine. Tours: 143–60.Google Scholar
Smith, D. G. (2004) ‘Thucydides’ Ignorant Athenians and the Drama of the Sicilian Expedition’. SyllClass 15: 33–70.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2004) ‘Elusive Stones: Reading Posidippus’ λιθικά through Technical Writing on Stones’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309). Cambridge, MA: 105–17.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. (2014) Man and Animal in Severan Rome: The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, A. H. and Pryce, F. N. (eds.) (1926) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum: Great Britain. British Museum 2. London.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1953) The Discovery of Mind: The Greek Origins of European Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (1987) Aristophanes: Birds. Warminster.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1994) Aristophanes: Thesmophoriazusae. Warminster.Google Scholar
Spanoudakis, K. (2002) Philitas of Cos. Leiden.Google Scholar
Spivey, N. J. (1997) ‘Bionic Statues’, in Powell, A. (ed.), The Greek World. London: 442–59.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013) ‘Ekphrasis at the Forge and the Forging of Ekphrasis: The “Shield of Achilles” in Graeco-Roman Word and Image’. Word and Image 29: 157–91.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (1994) The Tyrant’s Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (2001) Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. T. (2011) ‘Dancing with the Stars: Choreia in the Third Stasimon of Euripides’ Helen’.CP 106.4: 299–323.Google Scholar
Stephanis, I. E. (1988) Dionysiakoi Technitai: Symboles stên prosôpographia tou theatrou kai tês mousikês tôn archaiôn Hellênôn. Heraklion.Google Scholar
Stern, J. (2008) ‘Paradoxographus Vaticanus’, in Heilen, S. (ed.), In Pursuit of Wissenschaft: Festschrift für William M. Calder III zum 75. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: 437–66.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. (1990) Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. (2006) ‘The Textual Transmission of Ancient Fantastic Fiction: Some Case Studies’, in Hömke, N. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Fremde Wirklichkeiten: literarische Phantastik und antike Literatur. Heidelburg: 289–310.Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1984) The Lost Sophocles. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Swift, L. A. (2009) ‘The Symbolism of Space in Euripidean Choral Fantasy (Hipp. 732–75, Med. 824–65, Bacch. 370–433)’. CQ 59: 364–82.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1984) ‘Cognitive Aspects of Aristotle’s Theory of Metaphor’. Glotta 62: 40–5.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. C. (2010) Thucydides, Pericles, and the Idea of Athens in the Peloponnesian War. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (1993) ‘Euripides and Aeschylus: The Case of the Hekabe’. ClAnt 12: 126–59.Google Scholar
Thein, K. (2014) ‘Aristotle on Why Study Lower Animals: (De partibus animalium, I,5, 644b22–645a36)’. Eirene 50: 208–29.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. R. H. (2015) ‘Sophocles, Seduction and Shrivelling: Ichneutai Fr. 316 Radt 65.1’. CQ 65.1: 364–5.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. R. H. (2020) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (2000) Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, and the Art of Persuasion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tipton, J. A. (2014) Philosophical Biology in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1970) Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2011) ‘In the Footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, Allusion, and Metapoetics in Euripides. AJP 132: 177–204.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2013) Metapoetry in Euripides. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1952) ‘Paestan Pottery: A Revision and a Supplement’. PBSR 10: 1–53.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1967a) The Red-Figured Vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily, Vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1967b) The Red-Figured Vases of Lucania, Campania and Sicily, Vol. 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1967c) Phlyax Vases. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Trendall, A. D. (1987) The Red-Figured Vases of Paestum. London.Google Scholar
Trivigno, F. V. (2011) ‘Philosophy and the Ordinary: On the Setting of Plato’s Lysis’. GRBS 51.1: 61–85.Google Scholar
Tschemplik, A. (1993) ‘Framing the Question of Knowledge: Beginning Plato’s Theaetetus’, in Press, G. A. (ed), Plato’s Dialogues: New Studies and Interpretations. Lanham: 169–78.Google Scholar
Turkeltaub, D. (2003) The Gods’ Radiance Manifest: An Examination of the Narrative Pattern Underlying the Homeric Divine Epiphany Scenes. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Tybjerg, K. (2003) ‘Wonder-Making and Philosophical Wonder in Hero of Alexandria’. SHPS 34.3: 443–66.Google Scholar
Vanotti, G. (2007) Aristotele: Racconti meravigliosi. Milan.Google Scholar
Vardi, A. (2004) ‘Genre, Conventions, and Cultural Programme in Gellius’ Noctes Atticae’, in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford 159–86.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2007) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Hermes 51 and Antigonus of Carystus’. CQ 57.2: 737–42.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2011) ‘The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: Humour and Epiphany’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 82–104.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. (2013) The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar
Vernant, J. P. (1983) Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London.Google Scholar
Vickers, M. J. (1999) Ancient Greek Pottery. Oxford.Google Scholar
Voutiras, E. (2000) ‘La cadavre et le serpent, ou l’héroïsation manquée de Cléomène de Sparte’, in Pirenne-Delforge, V. and Suárez de la Torre, E. (eds.), Héros et héroïnes dans les mythes et les cultes grecs. Liège: 377–94.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (1936) Remains of Old Latin II: Livius Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2014) The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Welser, C. S. (2009) ‘Two Didactic Strategies at the End of Herodotus’ Histories (9.108–122)’. ClAnt 28: 359–85.Google Scholar
Wenskus, O. (2000) ‘Paradoxographoi’, in Der Neue Pauly 9. Stuttgart: 309–12.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003) Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Westermann, A. (1839) Paradoxographoi: Scriptores rerum mirabilium Graeci. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
White, S. A. (1992) ‘Aristotle’s Favorite Tragedies’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics. Princeton: 221–40.Google Scholar
Whitman, C. H. (1974) Euripides and the Full Circle of Myth. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1881) Antigonos von Karystos. Berlin.Google Scholar
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. (1883) ‘Die beiden Elektren’. Hermes 18: 214–63.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. (2004) ‘Prisoners and Puppeteers in the Cave’. OSAPh 27: 117–39.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (2000) ‘Dialogue and Comedy: The Structure of the Deipnosophistae’, in Braund, D. C. and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Athenaeus and His World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire. Exeter: 23–37.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. J. (2003) ‘The Sound of Conflict: Kritias and the Culture of μουσική in Athens’, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), The Cultures within Ancient Greek Culture: Contact, Conflict, Collaboration. Cambridge: 181–206.Google Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1969) ‘Euripides: Poiêtês Sophos’. Arethusa 2: 127–42.Google Scholar
Wohl, V. (2004) ‘Dirty Dancing: Xenophon’s Symposium’, in Murray, P. and Wilson, P. J. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City. Oxford: 337–63.Google Scholar
Wolff, C. (1992) ‘Euripides’ Iphigenia among the Taurians: Aetiology, Ritual, and Myth’. ClAnt 11: 308–34.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2011) Tales of the Barbarians: Ethnography and Empire in the Roman West. Chichester.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2013) ‘Introduction: Approaching the Ancient Library’, in König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Ancient Libraries. Cambridge: 1–20.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2005) Euripides’ Escape-Tragedies: A Study of Helen, Andromeda, and Iphigenia Among the Taurians. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2006) ‘Cyclops and the Euripidean Tetralogy’. PCPhS 52: 23–48.Google Scholar
Young, D. C. (1968) Three Odes of Pindar: A Literary Study of Pythian 11, Pythian 3 and Olympian 7. Leiden.Google Scholar
Zacharia, K. (2003) Converging Truths: Euripides’ Ion and the Athenian Quest for Self-Definition. Leiden.Google Scholar
Zanker, G. (2004) Modes of Viewing in Hellenistic Poetry and Art. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1989) ‘Mysteries of Identity and Designs of the Self in Euripides’. Ion’. PCPhS 35: 144–97.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (1990) ‘Thebes: Theater of Self and Society in Athenian Drama’, in Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. I. (eds.), Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton: 130–67.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (2011) ‘Sacrifices Holy and Unholy in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Prescendi, F. and Volokhine, Y. (eds.), Dans le laboratoire de l’historien de religions: mélanges offerts à Philippe Borgeaud. Geneva: 459–66.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. I. (2012) ‘A Study in Form: Three Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays’. Lexis 30: 361–78.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1981) Latin Textual Criticism in Antiquity. New York.Google Scholar
Ziegler, K. (1949) ‘Paradoxographoi’. RE 18.3: 1137–66.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Jessica Lightfoot, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Wonder and the Marvellous from Homer to the Hellenistic World
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009003551.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Jessica Lightfoot, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Wonder and the Marvellous from Homer to the Hellenistic World
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009003551.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Jessica Lightfoot, University of Birmingham
  • Book: Wonder and the Marvellous from Homer to the Hellenistic World
  • Online publication: 19 July 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009003551.009
Available formats
×