Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:56:53.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Much Is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Gary W. Cox  and
Eric Magar
Gary W. Cox
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Eric Magar
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A key premise of partisan theories of congressional organization is that majority status confers substantial procedural advantages. In this article, we take advantage of changes in party control of the House and Senate, such as that following the Republicans' historic victory in the midterm elections of 1994, to assess the value of majority status in terms of contributions from access-seeking political action committees (PACs). We estimate that majority status in the House was worth about $36,000 per member in receipts from corporate and trade PACs circa 1994—even controlling for the usual factors cited in the literature as affecting members' ability to raise money (such as committee assignments and voting record). The value of majority status in the Senate is even larger in absolute terms, although smaller in proportion to the total amount of money raised. Our results show that majority status is a valuable asset, one worth considerable collective effort to attain.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 299 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Books and Periodicals

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David. 1998. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 112 (3): 541–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Ross. 1989. House and Senate. 2d. ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant. 1993. The Almanac of American Politics, 1994. Washington, DC: National Journal.Google Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant. 1995. The Almanac of American Politics, 1996. Washington, DC: National Journal.Google Scholar
Congressional Directory. 1993. Official Congressional Directory 103d Congress, 1993–1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Congressional Directory. 1995. Official Congressional Directory 104th Congress, 1995–1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Congressional Yellow Book. Various issues. Washington, DC: Washington Monitor.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Magar, Eric. 1999. “Evaluating Majority Status in the U.S. Congress.” University of California at San Diego. Typescript.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. “Towards a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1376–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzau, Arthur T., and Munger, Michael C.. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80 (1): 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Electoral Commission. Various years. Reports on Financial Activity. Washington, DC: FEC.Google Scholar
Grenzke, Janet. 1988. “Comparing Contributions to U.S. House Members from Outside Their Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1): 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenzke, Janet. 1989. “Candidate Attributes and PAC Contributions.” Western Political Quarterly 42 (2): 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., and Munger, Michael C.. 1991. “Committee Assignments, Constituent Preferences, and Campaign Contributions to House Incumbents.” Economic Inquiry 29 (1): 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., and Munger, Michael C.. 1993. “Comparing Interest Group PAC Contributions to House and Senate Incumbents, 1980–1986” Journal of Politics 55 (3): 615–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., Munger, Michael C., and Roberts, Brian E.. 1994. “The Determinants of Industry Political Activity.” American Political Science Review 88 (December: 911–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard, and Wayman, Frank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84 (September: 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herndon, James F. 1982. “Access, Record and Competition as Influences on Interest Groups' Contributions to Congressional Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 44 (4): 996–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1995. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Hook, . 1997. “PACs Felt Heavy Republican Pressure to Donate.” Los Angeles Times, Sunday, April 27, 1997, p. A22.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 4th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23 (2): 235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven. 1994. “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (3): 777–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Milyo, Jeffrey. 1997. “Electoral and Financial Effects of Changes in Committee Power.” Journal of Law and Economics 40 (1): 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Romer, Thomas. 1985. “Patterns of Political Action Committee Contributions to the 1980 Campaigns for the United States House of Representatives.” Public Choice 47 (1): 63–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Steven B. 1995. “Near Death Experience: Don't Bury Them Yet but Democrats Are Losing the Battles for Money, Candidates and Voters.” U.S. News and World Report 119 (November 6): 28–38.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Snyder, James M.. 1994. “An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 745–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saltzman, Gregory. 1987. “Congressional Voting on Labor Issues: The Role of PACs.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 40 (2): 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric, and Rich, Andrew. 1997a. “Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1340–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickler, Eric, and Rich, Andrew. 1997b. “Party Government and the House Reconsidered: A Response to Cox and McCubbins.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 1992. “Are Contributors Rational? Untangling Strategies of Political Action Committees.” Journal of Political Economy 100 (3): 647–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covarience Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (4): 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Electoral Commission. “Information About Candidates, Parties and Other Committees.” 1999. <http://www.fec.gov/finance/finmenu.htm> (accessed February 11, 1999).+(accessed+February+11,+1999).>Google Scholar
Poole, Keith. 1999. “Data Available For Downloading.” <http://voteview.gsia.cmu.edu/dwnl.htm> (accessed February 11, 1999).Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1999. “Datafiles for ‘How Much Is Majority in the U.S. Congress Worth,’ written with Eric Magar.” <http://weber.ucsd.edu/~gcox> (accessed February 11, 1999).Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.