Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:17:42.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of trap colour, type, deployment height, and a host volatile on monitoring Orchestes fagi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Nova Scotia, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2019

Joel T.L. Goodwin Open the ORCID record for Joel T.L. Goodwin [Opens in a new window] ,
Simon P. Pawlowski ,
Peter D. Mayo ,
Peter J. Silk ,
Jon D. Sweeney  and
N. Kirk Hillier
Joel T.L. Goodwin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Acadia University, 33 Westwood Avenue, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Wilcox Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3E8, Canada
Simon P. Pawlowski
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Acadia University, 33 Westwood Avenue, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada
Peter D. Mayo
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3C 2G6, Canada
Peter J. Silk
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3C 2G6, Canada
Jon D. Sweeney
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service-Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3C 2G6, Canada
N. Kirk Hillier
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Acadia University, 33 Westwood Avenue, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, B4P 2R6, Canada
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Orchestes fagi (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a pest of beech trees (Fagus sylvatica Linnaeus; Fagaceae) in Europe that has recently become established and invasive on American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrhart) in Nova Scotia, Canada. We tested the effects of trap type, trap colour, trap height, and lure on the numbers of O. fagi captured per trap with the objective of developing a survey tool to monitor the weevil’s spread. We captured O. fagi in significantly greater numbers on yellow, green, or white traps than on light blue, dark blue, or red traps. There were no significant interactions between trap colour and trap design. Sticky triangular prism traps caught significantly more O. fagi than did nonsticky intercept traps regardless of colour. No effect of trap height was observed. Mean catch of O. fagi was significantly greater on yellow sticky triangular prism traps than on commercially sourced yellow sticky cards. Baiting yellow, green, or white sticky prism traps with the host volatile 9-geranyl-p-cymene did not increase catch of O. fagi. Our results suggest that yellow, green, or white sticky prism traps are a useful tool for detecting O. fagi adults and monitoring the spread of this species in Canada.

Type
Research Papers
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 152 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 98 - 109
Copyright
© 2019 Entomological Society of Canada. Parts of this are a work of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Owing to an printer’s error, the affiliations in the original online version of this article were in correctly listed. This has been corrected here and an erratum has been published.

Subject editor: Deepa Pureswaran

References

Allison, J.D. and Redak, R.A. 2017. The impact of trap type and design features on survey and detection of bark and woodboring beetles and their associates: a review and meta-analysis. Annual Review of Entomology, 62: 127–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archer, K.J., Lemeshow, S., and Hosmer, D.W. 2007. Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51: 4450–4464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, J.S. 1984. Bud burst and success of the beech weevil, Rhynchaenus fagi: feeding and oviposition. Ecological Entomology, 9: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bignucolo, O. and Korner, C. 2010. Leaf miner activity and its effects on leaf chemistry in adult beech under elevated CO2 . Basic and Applied Ecology, 11: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattli, J.G., Anderson, J., and Nilssen, A.C. 1998. Primary attraction and host tree selection in deciduous and conifer living Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae and Lymexylidae. Journal of Applied Entomology, 122: 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S.A and Borden, J.H. 2006. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecological Entomology, 31: 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chénier, J.V.R. and Philogène, B.J.R. 1989. Evaluation of three trap designs for the capture of conifer-feeding beetles and other forest Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 121: 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, D.J., Francese, J.A., Zylstra, K.E., Fraser, I., Sawyer, A.J., Bartels, D.W., et al. 2009. Laboratory and field response of the emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to selected regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 2160–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, K.J., Dubois, G.D., and Hoebeke, E.R. 2010. Trap type, lure placement, and habitat effects on Cerambycidae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera) catches in the northeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 698–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domingue, M.J., Imrei, Z., Lelito, J.P., Muskovits, J., Janik, G., Csóka, G., et al. 2013. Trapping of European buprestid beetles in oak forests using visual and olfactory cues. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148: 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, E.E., Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., and Millar, J.G. 2012. A comparison of trap type and height for capturing cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera). Journal of Economic Entomology, 105: 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, R. 1990. Flying behaviour and host finding of the beech leaf mining weevil, Rhynchaenus fagi L. (Col.: Curculionidae) entering the beech-wood after hibernation. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie, 7: 395–404.Google Scholar
Hausmann, C., Samietz, J., and Dorn, S. 2004. Visual orientation of overwintered Anthonomus pomorum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology, 33: 1410–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, D.R. and O’Brien, J.T. 1983. Beech bark disease. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet, 75: 1–8.Google Scholar
Machial, L.A., Lindgren, B.S., and Aukema, B.H. 2012. The role of vision in the host orientation behaviour of Hylobius warreni . Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 14: 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangels, J., Blüthgen, N., Frank, K., Grassein, F., Hilpert, A., and Mody, K. 2015. Tree species composition and harvest intensity affect herbivore density and leaf damage on beech, Fagus sylvatica, in different landscape contexts. Public Library of Science One, 10: e0126140. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126140.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, D.R. and Duerr, D.A. 2008. Comparison of arboreal beetle catches in wet and dry collection cups with Lindgren multiple funnel traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 107–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, A., Sweeney, J., Hughes, C., and Johns, R.C. 2017. Hitching a ride: firewood as a potential pathway for range expansion of an exotic beech leaf-mining weevil, Orchestes fagi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 149: 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otálora-Luna, F., Lapointe, S.L., and Dickens, J.C. 2013. Olfactory cues are subordinate to visual stimuli in a neotropical generalist weevil. Public Library of Science One, 8: e53120.Google Scholar
Patt, J.M. and Sétamou, M. 2010. Recognition of novel volatile cues by the nymphs of the glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis (Cicadellidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 23: 290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowski, S.P. 2014. Chemical ecology of the invasive beech leaf mining weevil, Orchestes fagi L., in Nova Scotia, Canada. Undergraduate honours thesis. Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada. Available from https://scholar.acadiau.ca/islandora/object/theses:1079 [accessed 20 August 2019].Google Scholar
Pawlowski, S.P. 2017. Comparative analyses on the phenology, electrophysiology, and chemistry of the beech leaf-mining weevil (Orchestes fagi L.) and its novel host American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.). M.Sc. thesis. Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada. Available from https://scholar.acadiau.ca/islandora/object/theses%3A2173/datastream/PDF/view [accessed 20 August 2019].Google Scholar
Phillipson, J. and Thompson, D.J. 1983. Phenology and intensity of phyllophage attack on Fagus sylvatica in Wytham Woods, Oxford. Ecological Entomology, 8: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. and Owens, E.D. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 28: 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J.L. 2011. Vision should not be overlooked as an important sensory modality for finding host plants. Environmental Entomology, 40: 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, J.L. and Lorch, P.D. 2009. Visual plant differentiation by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour, 22: 473–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reusch, W. 2013. Visible and ultraviolet spectroscopy [online]. Available from www2.chemistry.msu.edu/faculty/reusch/virttxtjml/spectrpy/uv-vis/spectrum.htm [accessed 29 September 2018].Google Scholar
RStudio Team. 2016. RStudio: integrated development environment for R. RStudio, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Silk, P.J., Mayo, P.D., LeClair, G., Brophy, M., Pawlowski, S.P., MacKay, C., et al. 2017. Semiochemical attractants for the beech leaf-mining weevil, Orchestes fagi (L.) (Curculionidae: Curculioninae: Rhamphini). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 164: 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, D., Salamanca, J., Kyryczenko-Roth, V., Alborn, H.T., and Rodriguez-Saona, C. 2018. Comparison of trap types, placement, and colors for monitoring Anthonomus musculus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) adults in highbush blueberries. Journal of Insect Science, 18(2): 19, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweeney, J., Anderson, R.S., Webster, R.P., and Neville, R. 2012. First records of Orchestes fagi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculionidae) in North America, with a checklist of the North American Rhamphini. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 66: 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J., Gutowski, J.M., Price, J., and De Groot, P. 2006. Effect of semiochemical release rate, killing agent, and trap design on detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.) and other longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 35: 645–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, J. and Johns, R. 2016. Beech leaf-mining weevil. Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre Impact Note 61. Available from http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/37778.pdf [accessed 19 August 2019].Google Scholar
Verkaik, E., Moraal, L., and Nabuurs, G. 2009. Potential Impacts of climate change on Dutch forests–mapping the risks. Alterra Wageningen Alterra-rapport 1761. Available from http://edepot.wur.nl/4627 [accessed 26 August 2019].Google Scholar
Ward, S.F., Venette, R.C., and Aukema, B.H. 2019. Cold tolerance of the invasive larch casebearer and implications for invasion success. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 21: 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar