Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:13:46.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of uranium: carbon ratios in fluid inclusion decrepitates by inductively coupled plasma emission spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. H. Rankin
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP
D. H. M. Alderton
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP
M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Imperial College, London SW7 2BP
J. E. Goulter
Affiliation:
Applied Research Laboratories Ltd., Luton, Beds

Abstract

Uranium has been detected in fluid inclusion decrepitates from quartz of several granites of the British Isles and from vein quartz associated with the Hcrcynian granites of SW England using ICP. Material, ejected from the inclusions during decrepitation on heating the sample, is transferred into the plasma for qualitative analysis via a stream of argon. Several other elements have been detected in the decrepitate, of which carbon is of particular interest. It shows a strong positive correlation with U and indicates the importance of C (presumably as carbonate complexes) in the transport of U in hydrothermal systems. Approximate order of magnitude estimates of the average U contents of fluid inclusions from the SW England samples, based on the assumption that U in the decrepitates is principally derived from the fluid inclusions, range from less than one to over a thousand ppm. Fluid inclusions may therefore be important in contributing to the levels of U reported in quartz (0.1 to 10 ppm).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Geology, Chelsea College, 552 Kings Road, London SW10 0UA.

References

Ball, T. K., and Basham, I. R. (1979 Proc. Ussher Soc. 4, 437-48.Google Scholar
Charoy, B. (1979 8ci. Terre Mém. 37, 364 pp. NancyGoogle Scholar
Cuney, M. (1978 Econ. Geol. 73, 1567-610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, N.J. (1976 Ph.D. thesis, Univ. London (unpubl.).Google Scholar
Jackson, N.J. Moore, J. McM., and Rankin, A. H. (1977 J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 134, 343-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagache, M., and Wisbrod, A. (1977 Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 62, 77-101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, J. (1978 Econ. Geol. 73, 1611-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumov, G. B. (1959 Geochem. 1, 5-20Google Scholar
Poty, B., Leroy, J., and Cuney, M. (1974a In Formation of uranium ore deposits. Proc. IAEA, Vienna, 569-82.Google Scholar
Poty, B., Stalder, H. A., and Weisbrod, A. (1974b Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 54, 717-52.Google Scholar
Rich, R. A., Holland, H. D., and Petersen, U. (1977 Hydrothermal uranium deposits (Elsevier, Amsterdam). 264 pp.Google Scholar
Roedder, E. (1963 Econ. Geol. 58, 167-211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roedder, E. -(1972 US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper, 440JJ.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. J. W., and Adams, J. A. S. (1969 Chapter 92 in Wedepohl (K. H.), ed. Handbook of Geochemistry, II-I (Springer-Vedag, Berlin).Google Scholar
Simpson, P. R., Brown, G. C., Plant, J., and Ostle, D. (1979 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A. 291, 385-412Google Scholar
Sorby, H. C. (1858 QJ Geol. Soc. London, 14, 453-500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M., Rankin, A. H., Walton, S. J., Halls, C., and Foo, B. N. (1980 Chem. Geol. 30, 121-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeliseyeva, O. P. (1977 Geochem. Int. 14, 37-49Google Scholar
Ypma, P. J. M. and Fuzikawa, K. (1980 In Proc. Int. Uranium Syrup. on Pine Creek Geosyncline. Ferguson, J., and Goleby, A. N., eds. IAEA, Vienna, 760 pp.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: