Introduction
In comparison with the general population, mortality risk is found much higher for individuals with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression (Osby et al., Reference Osby, Brandt, Correia, Ekbom and Sparén2001; Hoang et al., Reference Hoang, Stewart and Goldacre2011; Wahlbeck et al., Reference Wahlbeck, Westman, Nordentoft, Gissler and Laursen2011; Høye et al., Reference Høye, Nesvåg, Reichborn-Kjennerud and Jacobsen2016; Pratt et al., Reference Pratt, Druss, Manderscheid and Walker2016). People with schizophrenia were reported to experience a 2.5-fold risk of death, and a fairly high risk in death of suicide, with around 12-fold relative risk (Saha et al., Reference Saha, Chant and McGrath2007). Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) for individuals with bipolar disorder were almost double the general population (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Hayes, Broadbent, Fernandes, Lee, Hotopf and Stewart2010). Research on unipolar depressive disorder showed that the SMRs for all-natural causes of death were around 1.5 and the SMRs for suicide were over 20 (Osby et al., Reference Osby, Brandt, Correia, Ekbom and Sparén2001). Similarly, research on life expectancy among people with these mental illnesses showed substantially lower longevity, compared to the general population. A UK study revealed 14.6 years of life lost for men and 9.8 years lost for women for patients with schizophrenia (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Hayes, Perera, Broadbent, Fernandes, Lee, Hotopf and Stewart2011). The differential in mortality and shorted life expectancy have been considered as indicators of health inequality that people with mental illnesses did not equally benefit from social and healthcare advancement experienced by the general population.
Our previous study in Taiwan revealed that, from 2003 through 2011, the differential in mortality for people with schizophrenia slightly decreased, whereas the differential in mortality for bipolar disorder individuals remained relatively stable (Pan et al., Reference Pan, Yeh, Chan and Chang2017). The discrepant findings on excess mortality, defined as the number of deaths which occurred for a given condition or disease above what we would have expected to see under normal situations, of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder urged further research across various major mental illnesses, including unipolar depression. Despite the need of identifying target population and specific disease or cause to work with, a lack of clarity exists regarding the contributions from specific major causes of death, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, cancer or suicide to the elevated mortality across major mental illnesses. Various causes of death for the issues of health inequalities may reflect discrepancies in access to healthcare system or differences with regards to the burden of healthcare system for people with specific mental disorders. Furthermore, evidence remains relatively scarce for life expectancy at birth for people with these mental illnesses in Taiwan.
Having been defined as ‘severe mental disorders’ (i.e. psychosis – mainly schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and moderate to severe depression) according to the World Health Organization, people with these mental disorders tend to die earlier than the general population with a 10–25 year life expectancy reduction (World Health Organization, 2019). The primary aim of this study was to investigate how the differential of general mortality and life expectancy of people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder had changed over the years of observation. The second aim of this study was to explore whether the changes of the excess mortality would differ across diagnosis groups and causes of death to identify potential vulnerable groups. Therefore, we presented the changes of excess mortality and life expectancy at birth in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder, using nationwide cohorts who were diagnosed and treated in 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan, respectively. In our previous analysis (Pan et al., Reference Pan, Yeh, Chan and Chang2017), we applied the time frames of observation to define these cohorts for the reason that, earlier than 2005, national health insurance data linking to national mortality registry was lack of basic demographic information and the most updated data available was only given until the end of 2013. For the purposes of consistency, we defined the study cohorts in exact the same way. Three-year SMRs were calculated for each of the defined cohorts using the claim data linked to the national mortality registry from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan and then stratified by age, sex and diagnosis groups. Beyond general mortality, the SMRs by specific causes were carried out by sex and disease groups of major causes of death. To obtain a more intuitive impression of general mortality for individuals with these mental illnesses, life expectancies at birth were also calculated for the defined cohorts.
Materials and methods
Settings
Taiwan is an East Asian country with a population of approximately 23 million. In Taiwan, National Health Insurance, instituted in 1995, is a compulsory social insurance system for healthcare services with a single payer, centralising the disbursement to ensure not only low-cost but also equal access to health services for every citizen and legally hired foreigner who works in Taiwan. In 2008, a total of 22.92 million individuals were involved in the health insurance system, covering 99% of people in this country (National Health Insurance Administration, Taiwan, 2019). The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) consists of full records of health service utilisation, including demographics, procedures and medication, attached with corresponding health service expenditures. In the database, diagnosis is given by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). For the purposes of research, NHIRD was made available but restrictedly approved by the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, with a linkage to national mortality registry database to retrieve regularly updated data on causes and date of death.
Calculation of standardised mortality ratios (SMRs)
To be eligible as subjects of our 2005 and/or 2010 cohorts, the cohort members were ever given a diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM codes: 295*), bipolar disorder (ICD-9-CM codes: 296.0, 296.1, 296.4–296.7) or depression (ICD-9-CM codes: 296.2, 296.3, 300.4, 311) in the year of 2005 or 2010, aged 15 years or over on the index date of diagnosis, and then followed up after their psychiatric diagnosis through the observation periods (i.e. 2005–2008 and 2010–2013). Since the cohorts mixed with newly incident and existing cases for mental disorders, separately by cohorts, we calculated age- and sex-SMRs as the indicator of relative risk of general mortality during the 3-year observational periods for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression, with the 2011/2012 general population of Taiwan as the standard population (Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan). First of all, age- and sex-specific mortality rates for these study cohorts were generated by 5-year age bands (i.e. 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, … 85–89 and 90+ years old) and sex. Since the age- and sex-specific mortality rates of general population (i.e. the ‘standard population’ in the calculation process of indirect standardisation) were given by year, we had to apply a ‘weighting’ by the average follow-up period of each age-and-sex band for the calculation of expected number of deaths for the defined cohort (i.e. the ‘target populations’, the group of people with specific mental disorders in our analysis) by summing the weighted number of study subjects in each stratum, timed by their corresponding age- and sex-specific mortality rates of the general population. The observed number of death in a specific study cohort during the observation period of 3 years was then divided by the expected number of deaths to yield an SMR (Roberts et al., Reference Roberts, Wessely, Chalder, Chang and Hotopf2016). Method for the estimation of 95% confidence interval (CI) for an SMR was detailed elsewhere (Higham et al., Reference Higham, Flowers and Hall2005). In addition, we calculated SMRs by three age groups (15–44, 45–64 and 65+ years old), gender, as well as cause of deaths (natural and unnatural), respectively. Unnatural causes of death included ‘accidents and adverse effects’ (ICD-10 codes: E800–E949), ‘homicide and injury purposely inflicted by other persons’ (E960–E969) and ‘suicide and self-inflicted injury’ (E950–E959) in current analysis. We also calculated SMRs for specific underlying causes of death, including cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, cancer and suicide, respectively.
Life expectancy at birth
We utilised life expectancy at birth as an alternative but intuitive approach to delineate the extent to which major mental illness impact the general mortality of people with it in Taiwan and the differential in mortality between these people and general population. Life expectancy at birth is a demographic index to describe the general mortality of a specifically defined cohort followed up over a period of time, emphasising the impact of deaths at a younger age. The well accepted approach of its calculation was using the abridged life table method for 5-year age bands to estimate accumulated person-years contributed by the members of specific cohort, then divided by total number of people in the cohort (Chiang, Reference Chiang1984). As what had been done for the calculation of SMRs, ‘weighting’ of the average follow-up period of each 5-year age group in the calculations by gender was adopted to cope with the issue of dynamic study cohorts for an up to 3 years of follow-up period. As a standard template of calculation for life expectancy at birth, an official document of methodological recommendations, published by the UK Office for National Statistics (Methodology Group at Office for National Statistics, 2003), was the basis of related government reports. By using Microsoft Excel, life expectancies at birth for the study cohorts with specific mental disorders were estimated with the mortality rates for Taiwanese people under 15 years old as replacement, since people under 15 years of age were not supposed to be diagnosed as serious mental illnesses or depression in clinical practice. After the age of 15 years old, people with specific mental disorders took over the contribution for their person-time. We compared the outcomes of life expectancy at birth for our study cohorts to the national norms of Taiwan by gender as parameters, at last. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata SE 15 (Chicago, IL, USA) and Excel (Seattle, WA, USA). Alpha level was set at 0.05 as the criteria for statistical significance.
Results
Table 1 shows that a total of 95 632 people with schizophrenia, 45 392 people with bipolar disorder and 395 006 people with depressive disorders met the inclusion criteria of cohort 2005, and 104 561 people with schizophrenia, 58 317 people with bipolar disorder and 435 585 people with depressive disorders met the inclusion criteria for cohort 2010. The mean age of cohort 2005 was 47.45 years old and that of cohort 2010 was 49.95 years old. Among the calendar cohorts, 39.82–40.89% were men and 3.23–4.58% of them were from low-income households (recognised by the government as total income per person in the household lower than the minimum cost of living, set at 60% of the average monthly per capita nonproductive expenditure during the past year). Individuals with schizophrenia were more likely to be men and from low-income households compared with those with diagnosis of mood disorders.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and physical/mental comorbidities during the 12-month post-index period in 2005/2010 cohorts of major mental illnesses in Taiwan
NTD, new Taiwan dollars. CVD, cardiovascular disease. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
The SMRs for people with schizophrenia were over three folds of the general population, showing 3.65 (95% CI: 3.55–3.76) for cohort 2005 and 3.27 (95% CI: 3.18–3.36) for cohort 2010. A visualised summary for SMRs by psychiatric diagnoses, gender, and calendar cohorts was shown in Figure 1. The SMR due to natural causes remained relatively stable as a whole, whereas the SMR due to unnatural causes appeared to drop substantially (2005: 8.25 (95% CI: 7.77–8.75); 2010: 5.79 (95% CI: 5.41–6.18), shown in Table 2). For individuals with bipolar disorder, the SMR for general mortality were 2.65 (95% CI: 2.55–2.76) for cohort 2005 and 2.39 (95% CI: 2.31–2.48) for cohort 2010, respectively. The SMRs due to natural causes in individuals with bipolar disorder remained nearly unchanged over the years whereas the SMRs due to unnatural causes seemed to slightly decrease from 9.40 (95% CI: 8.67–10.16) for cohort 2005 to 7.90 (95% CI: 7.32–8.52) for cohort 2010 (Table 3). In contrast, the SMRs due to natural and unnatural causes decreased simultaneously for those of depressive disorders with main contributions from the lowered mortality of those older than 45 years (Table 4). With regards to SMRs due to specific cause of death, individuals with depression experienced minimising differential in mortality due to cancer, CVD and diabetes mellitus. For those with schizophrenia, the SMRs due to diabetes mellitus slightly reduced over the years. Additionally, the differential in mortality rates due to suicide reduced for schizophrenia and depressive disorder over the years, but not for bipolar disorder, which even showed a potentially worsen scenario for suicide death (Table 5).
Table 2. SMRs for people with schizophrenia in cohorts 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan by causes of death, age groups and gender
Table 3. SMRs for people with bipolar disorder in cohorts 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan by causes of death, age groups and gender
Table 4. SMRs for people with depressive disorder in cohorts 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan by causes of death, age groups and gender
Table 5. Cause-specific SMRs for cohorts 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan by psychiatric diagnoses, major groups of death and gender
CVD, cardiovascular diseases; DM, diabetes mellitus.
As shown in Table 6, life expectancies at birth for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression were all significantly lower than those of the general population in Taiwan. Specifically, the life expectancies at birth for schizophrenia were 59.53 (57.83-61.22) years for men and 65.65 (63.90-67.39) years for women in cohort 2005; the figures were 60.65 (58.84-62.47) years for men and 67.18 (65.38-68.98) years for women in cohort 2010. Meanwhile, the life expectancies at birth were 74.5 years for men and 80.8 years for women in the general population of Taiwan in 2005. In 2010, the figures were 76.15 years for men and 82.66 years for women (National Health Insurance Administration, Taiwan, 2018). Accordingly, our results revealed 14.97–15.50 years of life lost for men and 15.15–15.48 years lost for women for schizophrenia. For individuals with bipolar disorder, 14.71–15.53 years of life lost for men and 12.69–12.82 years of life lost for women were reported, whereas, for those with depressive disorder, 11.99–12.43 years lost for men and 6.83–7.29 years lost for women were found.
Table 6. Life expectancies at birth for people with major mental disorders by gender and psychiatric diagnoses for cohorts 2005 and 2010 in Taiwan with 3-year follow-up
a Life expectancy at birth of 2005 in Taiwan: male = 74.5 years; female = 80.8 years.
b Life expectancy at birth of 2010 in Taiwan: male = 76.15 years; female = 82.66 years.
Discussion
Compared to the general population, the risk of death for people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression in Taiwan had been elevated, with an over one-and-half-fold relative risk in people with depression, over two-fold relative risk in people with bipolar disorder and over three-fold relative risk in people with schizophrenia. Besides, compared to national norms in Taiwan, all three mental illnesses were associated with substantially lower life expectancies at birth, showing 11.99–15.53 years life lost for men and 6.83–15.48 years life lost for women. Beyond the increase of all-cause mortality, we found that observed relative risks of mortality varied by causes of death and types of mental disorders. SMRs due to natural and unnatural causes both seemed to decrease over the study years for those with depressive disorders, mainly contributed by the decreased mortality of those older than 45 years. However, for people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the differential in mortality due to natural causes remained relatively unchanged over the years. Further analyses on specific causes of death showed that the differential in mortality due to suicide decreased over the years for schizophrenia and depressive disorder, but not for bipolar disorder.
Interventions and keeping contacts with specialist mental health services were shown effective at decreasing suicide risks in people with early-stage psychosis (Harris et al., Reference Harris, Burgess, Chant, Pirkis and McGorry2008; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Tang, Hui, Chiu, Lam, Law, Yew, Wong, Chung, Tso, Chan, Yip, Hung and Honer2011). Family involvement at early stages might also reduce the risk of unnatural-cause mortality in a 10-year follow-up of people with schizophrenia and other psychoses (Reininghaus et al., Reference Reininghaus, Dutta, Dazzan, Doody, Fearon, Lappin, Heslin, Onyejiaka, Donoghue, Lomas, Kirkbride, Murray, Croudace, Morgan and Jones2015). The substantial findings of improvement in general mortality about depressive disorder for both genders shown in Fig. 1 suggested systemic improvements occurring in Taiwan during the study periods which might have driven the reduction in natural death risk as what hypothesised before (Dhar and Barton, Reference Dhar and Barton2016). Nonetheless, these reductions were not that obvious for those with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, highlight the importance of developing related strategies to improve health outcomes for those with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in terms of what is lacking now and how to improve the current situations. Specifically, the reduced unnatural-cause differential in mortality rates in people with schizophrenia in Taiwan might be partly accounted for by the continuous improvement in the quality of care and accessibility to related healthcare services provided by national health insurance and social welfare systems over the study years. Furthermore, several nationwide suicide prevention programmes have been launched for years in Taiwan. Taiwan National Suicide Surveillance System has been established since 2006, making the first effort to universally register suicide attempts at a national level and giving support to individuals with a structured intervention programme that includes brief counselling, psychoeducation and follow-up contacts. This highly integrated aftercare programme was shown to decrease suicidal behaviours and to delay suicide death (Pan et al., Reference Pan, Chang, Lee, Chen, Liao and Caine2013). Despite all these suicide-prevention strategies, the persistent suicide-related differential in mortality for bipolar disorder patients in comparison with the general population as revealed in current analysis suggests the need for particular risk assessment and prevention of suicide in those with bipolar disorder.
Fig. 1. Standardised mortality ratios for people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or depression disorder in Taiwan by gender in 2005/2010 cohorts.
Health inequality was found differed by type of mental illnesses with schizophrenia as the most disadvantaged group showing a remarkably high SMR in the current study. Among the mortality due to specific natural causes, over three-fold relative risk for CVD and diabetes mellitus related mortality warrants further attention in patients with schizophrenia. In contrast to bipolar disorder, over the study years, the SMRs of cancer, CVD and diabetes mellitus all decreased in individuals with depression, suggesting a reduction in the natural-cause differential in mortality rates. However, for those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, only the SMR of diabetes mellitus seemed decreasing for patients with schizophrenia and no specific natural death causes apparently reduced for those with bipolar disorder, suggesting the existence of a persistent differential in mortality rates due to comorbid physical conditions. With regards to each specific cause of death, a systematic review showed that the pooled SMR due to cancer was 1.40 (95% CI: 1.29–1.52, p < 0.001) for individuals with schizophrenia (Zhuo et al., Reference Zhuo, Tao, Jiang, Lin and Shao2017); our results showed an SMR of 1.22 in cohort 2005 and 1.37 in cohort 2010 for cancer related mortality. Prior research also showed that the impact of diabetes mellitus on mortality was significantly higher in schizophrenia than hospital controls (Schoepf et al., Reference Schoepf, Potluri, Uppal, Natalwala, Narendran and Heun2012). A Taiwanese study reported that the adjusted hazard ratios were 1.49 (95% CI: 1.32–1.68) for macrovascular complications and 3.68 (95% CI: 3.21–4.22) for all-cause mortality in people with diabetes and schizophrenia, compared with those with diabetes only (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Lai and Gau2015). For people with mood disorders, a hospital-based Swedish study reported that, most excess deaths for people with bipolar disorder were from natural causes in comparison with general population, but, for unipolar depressive disorder, most excess deaths were from unnatural causes (Osby et al., Reference Osby, Brandt, Correia, Ekbom and Sparén2001). Along with our finding of the persistent differential in mortality owing to natural causes, future efforts on prevention, monitoring and management of physical comorbidities is of utmost relevance to improve overall health for vulnerable people with mental illnesses, particularly for those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
Our results revealed that all three major mental illnesses were associated with substantially lower life expectancies at birth, showing 11.99–15.53 years life lost for men and 6.83–15.48 years life lost for women (National Health Insurance Administration, Taiwan, 2018). In comparison with a previous UK study (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Hayes, Perera, Broadbent, Fernandes, Lee, Hotopf and Stewart2011), our results seemed to present more years of life lost particularly for women with schizophrenia and men with bipolar disorder. Prior research revealed that individuals with serious mental illnesses in eight US states from 1997 to 2000 had lower life expectancies of 13 to more than 30 years life lost, compared to the general population (Colton and Manderscheid, Reference Colton and Manderscheid2006). A Swedish study using a nationwide hospital discharge registry reported substantial differences in life expectancy at age 30 in comparison with the general population, including affective psychosis (15.9 years life lost), substance abuse (15.6 years life lost) and organic psychosis (14.8 years life lost) among men and organic psychosis (22.6 years life lost), mental retardation (14.7 years life lost) and substance abuse (18.8 years life lost) among women (Hannerz et al., Reference Hannerz, Borga and Borritz2001). Preliminary strategies for preventing premature deaths had been suggested, emphasising the management of suicide risks and physical illnesses by the improvement of accessibility to health care for comorbid physical illnesses (Auquier et al., Reference Auquier, Lancon, Rouillon, Lader and Holmes2006). Last but perhaps foremost, intervention programmes regarding the modifications of lifestyle risk factors, including health psychoeducation, regular health screening, intensive management of metabolic syndrome and health promotion programmes, such as encouraging exercise, should be further re-enforced.
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of current analysis contained great representativeness of whole country coverage, all diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depressive disorder given in clinical settings, and follow-up for up to consecutive 3 years, generating evidence of great interest to clinicians, investigators and policy makers. Linkage to national mortality registry was also a strength of current study, providing complete all causes of death with sufficient details and exact date of death. Of note, the major limitation was that these two defined cohorts were overlapped to a certain extent (i.e. people with major mental illness may keep alive through these two observation periods), making it challenging to discriminate the differences between two partially dependent cohorts by proper statistical tests. The other one was that the estimations of SMR and life expectancy at birth were just preliminary attempts to control confounding from age and/or gender structure, not a complete solution for all potential confounders. Thus, further analysis with full consideration of all potential confounders by studies in various settings to address the issue of residual confounding is warranted. Finally, because of the issue of limited observation windows, we could only identify the date of the first diagnosis given in 2005/2010, for which cohort members were inevitably mixing incident and prevalent cases. For incident cases, the adjustment period around their confirmed diagnoses could be thus ignored and disregard some at-risk periods.
Conclusion
In conclusion, based on large nationwide cohorts, our investigation suggested that, compared to the general population, the excess mortality and shortened life expectancy in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression remained noticeable in Taiwan. Specifically, we revealed differential patterns for the changes of different mental illnesses. Future studies are warranted to further elucidate relative risks in different causes of deaths and to generate evidence assisting us in reducing mortality risks by improving healthcare services and physical health for those with major mental illnesses. Besides, comorbid psychiatric illnesses might be of specific research interest in future for the finding that suicide prevention strategies seemed less effectively for bipolar disorder than depression or schizophrenia. Further understanding on the differences in theses under-explored mental illnesses with regards to suicide risk may answer the heterogeneity in the nature and intensity of disease dimensions, including the role of impulsivity from a symptomatology perspective.
Data
For data used in the current study, there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing de-identified dataset, regulated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.
Acknowledgements
This study is based in part on data from the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.
Financial support
This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 104-2314-B-418-003; MOST 106-2314-B-418-002 and MOST 107-2314-B-418-014) and Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (FEMH-2017-C-017; FEMH-2018-C-022 and FEMH-2019-C-012). The funding bodies played no role in study design, analysis or interpretation of data in this paper.
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standards
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Open access
