Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:06:00.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiation of wild accessions within the Panax bipinnatifidus complex using newly developed polymorphic microsatellite markers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2024

Jie Song
Affiliation:
Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
Yujuan Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
Xun Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
Yuezhi Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Economic Plants and Biotechnology, Yunnan Key Laboratory for Wild Plant Resources, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
*
Corresponding author: Yuezhi Pan; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Panax L., renowned as ginseng genus, is a famous medicinal group of family Araliaceae. Within this genus, the taxa of Panax bipinnatifidus complex are mainly distributed in Himalayas and Hengduan Mountain areas. Due to the complex evolutionary history and short-term rapid radiation, the relationships among species within the complex have not been clearly resolved, and the taxa identification is difficult due to the intermediate morphological traits. This study aimed to use the available restriction-site associated DNA sequence data from 29 individuals of P. bipinnatifidus complex to mine high-polymorphic simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, with the goal of evaluating their utility in taxa identification. Eleven polymorphic SSR loci were ultimately selected and validated through polymerase chain reactions amplifying across 63 individuals of P. bipinnatifidus complex and 13 individuals of three outgroup species. The subsequent genetic diversity analysis uncovered 76 alleles in total, ranging from 5 to 15 per locus. Observed heterozygosity spanned 0.241–0.512, while expected heterozygosity ranged between 0.345 and 0.644. The genetic kinship analysis revealed a sister relationship between Panax zingiberensis and Panax vietnamensis. The analysis result also supported the classification of samples from Hunan and Hubei provinces into a single genetic unit within the P. bipinnatifidus complex. These newly developed SSR markers will facilitate the identification of wild ginseng plants.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Introduction

Panax L., a genus of family Araliaceae, is an important medicinal resource mainly distributed in Himalayas area and central and southwestern China. The pharmaceutical activities of Panax species attribute mainly to ginsenosides, which are salutary for cardiovascular health. Comparative genome analysis revealed the evolutionary trajectory of ginsenoside biosynthesis (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Li, Yang, Peng, Song, Lin, Xiang, Li, Ye, Ma, Miao, Zhang, Chen, Yang and Dong2023). Four Panax taxa, P. zingiberensis, P. vietnamensis, P. wangianus and P. bipinnatifidus were treated as P. bipinnatifidus complex due to the difficulties in species delimitation and unresolved evolutionary relationships among them (Zuo et al., Reference Zuo, Chen, Kondo, Funamoto, Wen and Zhou2011, Reference Zuo, Wen, Ma and Zhou2015; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang, Sun, Guo, Gong and Pan2020). This species complex, characterized by a spectrum of intermediates or transitional characters in root, leaf, flower and fruit morphology (Wen and Zimmer, Reference Wen and Zimmer1996; Lee and Wen, Reference Lee and Wen2004; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang, Sun, Guo, Gong and Pan2020), underwent rapid demographic expansion during the Oligocene (Zuo et al., Reference Zuo, Wen and Zhou2017), and the taxonomic relationships among the species remain contentious (Lee and Wen, Reference Lee and Wen2004; Zuo et al., Reference Zuo, Chen, Kondo, Funamoto, Wen and Zhou2011, Reference Zuo, Wen, Ma and Zhou2015; Wen et al., Reference Wen, Zhang, Nie, Zhong and Sun2014; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Li, Li, Jiang, Zhang, Pan, Liu, Xiao and Li2015; Ji et al., Reference Ji, Liu, Yang, Yang, He, Wang, Yang and Yi2019; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang, Sun, Guo, Gong and Pan2020). This taxonomic uncertainty complicates the precise identification of species and may pose an obstacle to the conservation of these valuable wild resources.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs), a form of Mendelian inheritance and codominant microsatellite markers, are renowned for their high levels of polymorphism and reproducibility (Varshney et al., Reference Varshney, Graner and Sorrells2005; Kalia et al., Reference Kalia, Rai, Kalia, Singh and Dhawan2011). They have been extensively applied in studies of genetic diversity and species delimitation (Hauser et al., Reference Hauser, Athrey and Leberg2021). Several researchers have focused on the development of SSR markers in the three most famous ginseng species, Panax notoginseng, P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Kim, Kim, Choi, Ahn, Lee and Yang2011; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Shi, Li, Liu and Li2016; Jang et al., Reference Jang, Jang, Kim, Waminal, Kim, Lee and Yang2020; Su et al., Reference Su, Zhang, Yang, Qu, Cui, Ge and Liu2023). Within the P. bipinnatifidus complex, only nine SSR markers were developed from the transcriptome data of P. vietnamensis (Vu et al., Reference Vu, Shah, Pham, Bui, Nguyen and Nguyen2020), and their transferability was not tested in the related species. The objective of this study was to develop highly polymorphic SSR markers from restriction-site associated DNA sequence (RAD-seq) data of P. bipinnatifidus complex, with the goal of ascertaining their efficacy in identifying the wild resources of this complex.

Experimental procedure

We selected RAD-seq datasets of 29 diploid individuals of the P. bipinnatifidus complex, from our previous study (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang, Sun, Guo, Gong and Pan2020), to develop SSR markers utilizing Stacks v1.48 (Catchen et al., Reference Catchen, Hohenlohe, Bassham, Amores and Cresko2013) and QDD v3.1.2 (Meglécz et al., Reference Meglécz, Pech, Gilles, Dubut, Hingamp, Trilles, Grenier and Martin2014). The threshold for the minimum number of repeats was set at six for dinucleotides and trinucleotides, and five for tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotides. Subsequently, primer pairs were designed employing default parameters of Primer 3 (Untergasser et al., Reference Untergasser, Cutcutache, Koressaar, Ye, Faircloth, Remm and Rozen2012). Eighty-four primer pairs were successfully designed and their universality was ascertained through polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) with 10 individuals randomly chosen from P. bipinnatifidus complex. Details of the PCR mixture composition and protocol are provided in the online Supplementary file (Tables S1 and S2). Totally, 48 pairs of primers were successfully amplified, followed by linking with fluorescent adapters. Subsequent PCRs were performed to assess the polymorphisms within the P. bipinnatifidus complex (online Supplementary Table S3) using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Allele scoring was conducted manually, by recording co-dominant values to generate a data matrix with GenALEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, Reference Peakall and Smouse2012) for subsequent analysis. Ultimately, 11 primer pairs with high polymorphisms were identified (Table 1), and the allele data from these loci were utilized to construct the phylogenetic trees encompassing 63 individuals from P. bipinnatifidus complex and 13 individuals from three outgroup taxa (P. notoginseng, P. stipuleanatus and P. japonicus) (online Supplementary Table S3). Total DNA extraction from leaf tissues was performed using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) procedure (Doyle, Reference Doyle, Hewitt and Johnston1991). The trees were constructed using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average (UPGMA) in PowerMarker 3.25 (Liu and Muse, Reference Liu and Muse2005), and a consensus tree (Fig. 1) was obtained using the program ‘consensus’ in the Phylip package (Felsenstein, Reference Felsenstein2005) after summarizing 2000 trees.

Table 1. Genetic properties of the 11 polymorphic SSR markers developed in P. bipinnatifidus complex

T m, annealing temperature; A, allele number; H O, observed heterozygosity; H E, expected heterozygosity; G is, inbreeding coefficient.

Figure 1. UPGMA tree of 76 individuals based on the data of 11 SSR markers. Branches with different colours represent different taxon clades.

Discussion

Initially, our analysis detected 7458 loci containing perfect microsatellites in the 9,014,726 RAD reads, including the most abundant dinucleotide repeats (50.60%) and trinucleotide repeats (36.78%) as observed in P. ginseng (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Kim, Kim, Choi, Ahn, Lee and Yang2011). After screening treatment following the criteria (online Supplementary Table S4), 11 SSR primer sets were retained and were successfully amplified across all the 63 individuals of the P. bipinnatifidus complex, demonstrating extremely high transferability in this taxonomic group. The features of these 11 SSR primer sets and the corresponding indices of genetic diversity within P. bipinnatifidus complex are detailed in Table 1. The analysis discovered 76 alleles in total across the 11 SSR loci, averaging 6.9 alleles per locus and ranging from 5 to 15. The observed heterozygosity (H O) ranged from 0.241 to 0.512, with an overall mean of 0.346. The expected heterozygosity (H E) ranged from 0.345 to 0.644, averaging 0.469 across loci. The maximum value of inbreeding coefficient (G is) was 0.467 at locus P21, whereas the minimum value was 0.111 at locus P5. Cross-species amplification analysis within the three outgroups indicated high transferability in P. japonicus (97.7%), P. stipuleanatus (75%) and in P. notoginseng (73.6%). Notably, locus P25 failed to be amplified in any individual of P. stipuleanatus and P. notoginseng, but succeeded in all P. japonicus individuals.

UPGMA tree (Fig. 1) revealed that 63 individuals of the P. bipinnatifidus complex were grouped into one big clade. The samples of P. zingiberensis and P. vietnamensis formed the monophyletic group, respectively, with their sister relationship corroborated by prior research utilizing the RAD-seq data (Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Yang, Sun, Guo, Gong and Pan2020). The remaining accessions of P. bipinnatifidus and P. wangianus formed several smaller clades and nested into each other. Additionally, the samples recently collected from Hunan and Hubei provinces, clustered together, exhibited a close genetic affinity with the samples identified as P. wangianus (KM) and P. bipinnatifidus (LJ and LD). This genetic concordance substantiated our initial taxonomic assignment of these samples as P. wangianus, primarily based on morphological characteristics such as the fleshy roots and lanceolate leaflets. These newly developed SSR markers will be important molecular resources for future investigation on conservation genetics of the wild ginseng plants.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262124000480.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570339).

Competing interests

None.

References

Catchen, J, Hohenlohe, PA, Bassham, S, Amores, A and Cresko, WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Molecular Ecology 22, 31243140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, HI, Kim, NH, Kim, JH, Choi, BS, Ahn, IO, Lee, JS and Yang, TJ (2011) Development of reproducible EST-derived SSR markers and assessment of genetic diversity in Panax ginseng cultivars and related species. Journal of Ginseng Research 35, 399412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, J (1991) DNA protocols for plants–CTAB total DNA isolation. In Hewitt, GM and Johnston, A (eds), Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 283293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, J (2005) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6. Distributed by the Author. Seattle: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Hauser, SS, Athrey, G and Leberg, PL (2021) Waste not, want not: microsatellites remain an economical and informative technology for conservation genetics. Ecology and Evolution 11, 1580015814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, W, Jang, Y, Kim, NH, Waminal, NE, Kim, YC, Lee, JW and Yang, TJ (2020) Genetic diversity among cultivated and wild Panax ginseng populations revealed by high-resolution microsatellite markers. Journal of Ginseng Research 44, 637643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ji, YH, Liu, CK, Yang, ZY, Yang, LF, He, ZS, Wang, HC, Yang, JB and Yi, TS (2019) Testing and using complete plastomes and ribosomal DNA sequences as the next generation DNA barcodes in Panax (Araliaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources 19, 13331345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, P, Shi, FX, Li, YL, Liu, B and Li, LF (2016) Development of highly transferable microsatellites for Panax ginseng (Araliaceae) using whole-genome data. Applications in Plant Sciences 4, 1600075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalia, RK, Rai, MK, Kalia, S, Singh, R and Dhawan, AK (2011) Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177, 309334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C and Wen, J (2004) Phylogeny of Panax using chloroplast trnC-trnD intergenic region and the utility of trnC-trnD in interspecific studies of plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31, 894903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K and Muse, SV (2005) PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 21282129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meglécz, E, Pech, N, Gilles, A, Dubut, V, Hingamp, P, Trilles, A, Grenier, R and Martin, JF (2014) QDD version 3.1: a user-friendly computer program for microsatellite selection and primer design revisited: experimental validation of variables determining genotyping success rate. Molecular Ecology Resources 14, 13021313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peakall, R and Smouse, PE (2012) GenALEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28, 25372539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, FX, Li, MR, Li, YL, Jiang, P, Zhang, C, Pan, YZ, Liu, B, Xiao, HX and Li, LF (2015) The impacts of polyploidy, geographic and ecological isolations on the diversification of Panax (Araliaceae). BMC Plant Biology 15, 297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, L, Zhang, Y, Yang, Y, Qu, Y, Cui, X, Ge, F and Liu, D (2023) Development of SSR markers on the basis of the Panax notoginseng transcriptome for agronomic and biochemical trait association analyses. Journal of Applied Research on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants 34, 100475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Untergasser, A, Cutcutache, I, Koressaar, T, Ye, J, Faircloth, BC, Remm, M and Rozen, SG (2012) Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40, e115e115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varshney, RK, Graner, A and Sorrells, ME (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23, 4855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vu, DD, Shah, SNM, Pham, MP, Bui, VT, Nguyen, MT and Nguyen, TPT (2020) De novo assembly and transcriptome characterization of an endemic species of Vietnam, Panax vietnamensis Ha et Grushv., including the development of EST-SSR markers for population genetics. BMC Plant Biology 20, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, J, Zhang, JQ, Nie, ZL, Zhong, Y and Sun, H (2014) Evolutionary diversifications of plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Frontiers in genetics 5, 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, J and Zimmer, EA (1996) Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inferences from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6, 167177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Z, Li, X, Yang, L, Peng, S, Song, W, Lin, Y, Xiang, G, Li, Y, Ye, S, Ma, C, Miao, J, Zhang, G, Chen, W, Yang, S and Dong, Y (2023) Comparative genomics reveals the diversification of triterpenoid biosynthesis and origin of ocotillol-type triterpenes in Panax. Plant Communication 4, 100591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, MM, Yang, GQ, Sun, GL, Guo, ZH, Gong, X and Pan, YZ (2020) Resolving complicated relationships of the Panax bipinnatifidus complex in southwestern China by RAD-seq data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 149, 106851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuo, YJ, Chen, ZJ, Kondo, K, Funamoto, T, Wen, J and Zhou, SL (2011) DNA barcoding of Panax species. Planta Medica 77, 182187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuo, YJ, Wen, J, Ma, JS and Zhou, SL (2015) Evolutionary radiation of the Panax bipinnatifidus species complex (Araliaceae) in the Sino–Himalayan region of eastern Asia as inferred from AFLP analysis. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 53, 210220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, YJ, Wen, J and Zhou, SL (2017) Intercontinental and intracontinental biogeography of the eastern Asian–Eastern North American disjunct Panax (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae), emphasizing its diversification processes in eastern Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 117, 6074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Genetic properties of the 11 polymorphic SSR markers developed in P. bipinnatifidus complex

Figure 1

Figure 1. UPGMA tree of 76 individuals based on the data of 11 SSR markers. Branches with different colours represent different taxon clades.

Supplementary material: File

Song et al. supplementary material

Song et al. supplementary material
Download Song et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.7 KB