Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:38:21.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficient dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression for 100 W level ultrafast lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

Zichen Gao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Jie Guo*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Yongxi Gao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Yuguang Huang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Zhihua Tu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Xiaoyan Liang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
*
Correspondence to: J. Guo and X. Liang, State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 390 Qinghe Road, Jiading, Shanghai 201800, China. Emails: [email protected] (J. Guo); [email protected] (X. Liang)
Correspondence to: J. Guo and X. Liang, State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics and CAS Center for Excellence in Ultra-intense Laser Science, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 390 Qinghe Road, Jiading, Shanghai 201800, China. Emails: [email protected] (J. Guo); [email protected] (X. Liang)

Abstract

We demonstrate efficient and economical all-solid-state post-compression based on dual-stage periodically placed thin fused silica plates driven by a more than 100 W ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet Innoslab amplifier seeded by a fiber frontend. Not only is a more than eight-fold pulse compression with 94% transmission achieved, but also the pulse quality and spatial mode are improved, which can be attributed to the compensation for the residual high-order dispersion and the spatial mode self-cleaning effect during the nonlinear process. It enables a high-power ultrafast laser source with 64 fs pulse duration, 96 W average power at 175 kHz repetition rates and good spatiotemporal quality. These results highlight that this all-solid-state post-compression can overcome the bandwidth limitation of Yb-based lasers with exceptional efficiency and mitigate the spatiotemporal degradation originating from the Innoslab amplifier and fiber frontend, which provides an efficient and economical complement for the Innoslab laser system and facilitates this robust and compact combination as a promising scheme for high-quality higher-power few-cycle laser generation.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Chinese Laser Press

1 Introduction

High-power ultrafast laser sources are highly demanded tools in various ultrafast applications[ Reference Saule, Heinrich, Schötz, Lilienfein, Högner, deVries, Plötner, Weitenberg, Esser, Schulte, Russbueldt, Limpert, Kling, Kleineberg and Pupeza 1 Reference Mikaelsson, Vogelsang, Guo, Sytcevich, Viotti, Langer, Cheng, Nandi, Jin, Olofsson, Weissenbilder, Mauritsson, L’Huillier, Gisselbrecht and Arnold 3 ]. The high peak power enables these applications to be driven, while the high average power satisfies their need for high photon flux and high signal-to-noise ratio. Thanks to the high quantum and Stokes efficiency, as well as the excellent thermal management of state-of-the-art fiber, thin-disk and Innoslab laser architectures, Yb-based lasers are capable of reaching several hundred watts, and even more than 1 kW[ Reference Stark, Buldt, Muller, Klenke and Limpert 4 Reference Nubbemeyer, Kaumanns, Ueffing, Gorjan, Alismail, Fattahi, Brons, Pronin, Barros, Major, Metzger, Sutter and Krausz 7 ].

Solid-state amplifiers shine in terms of high pulse energy owing to the negligible nonlinear effect and high damage threshold of key devices, especially the Innoslab amplifier endowed with a compact configuration and high amplification factor. The fiber laser can work as an outstanding frontend owing to its robustness, excellent beam quality and the integration of chirped fiber Bragg gratings (CFBGs) as the stretcher without misaligning like the grating stretcher. Hence, the Innoslab amplifier seeded by a fiber frontend provides an attractive choice for achieving a superior high-power laser systems[ Reference Mecseki, Windeler, Miahnahri, Robinson, Fraser, Fry and Tavella 8 Reference Gao, Guo, Huang, Gao, Gan, Tu, Liang and Li 10 ]. However, there are still some drawbacks that cannot be ignored. Firstly, the narrow gain bandwidth limits the generation of sub-100 fs ultrashort pulses, which is a common drawback of Yb-based lasers. Secondly, the compressed pulses always show obvious pedestals, which can be attributed to the inability of the grating compressor in offsetting the higher-order dispersion, mainly from fiber frontend. Finally, the output beam of the Innoslab amplifier is always elliptical and accompanied with spatial distortion. The implementation of high-quality beam generally requires state-of-the-art reshaping and spatial filtering.

Post-compression technology is an effective route for overcoming the narrow bandwidth limitation, which mainly relies on spectral broadening by self-phase modulation (SPM). Due to the long-distance nonlinear effect with gas medium and the waveguide structure, many pulse compression results with large compression factor and high spatial quality are demonstrated by the gas-filled hollow core fiber technology[ Reference Balciunas, Fourcade-Dutin, Fan, Witting, Voronin, Zheltikov, Gerome, Paulus, Baltuska and Benabid 11 Reference Pi, Kim and Goulielmakis 14 ]. However, the low fiber coupling efficiency, alignment sensitivity and increased susceptibility to damage at high power are the inescapable drawbacks, which restrict its application to high power lasers. The multi-pass cell approach is also a widely applied technique[ Reference Russbueldt, Weitenberg, Schulte, Meyer, Meinhardt, Hoffmann and Poprawe 15 Reference Viotti, Li, Arisholm, Winkelmann, Hartl, Heyl and Seidel 21 ]. In contrast, high transmission efficiency pulse compression can be achieved because of the absence of fiber coupling loss. Nonetheless, the large number of reflections on the cavity mirrors requires a state-of-the-art coating with high reflectivity and low (or negative) group-delay dispersion, which is costly and technically challenging. Impressive performances are also shown in multi-thin-solid-plates (MTSP) technique which is simple, robust and economical[ Reference Beetar, Gholam-Mirzaei and Chini 22 Reference Lu, Tsou, Chen, Chen, Cheng, Yang, Chen, Hsu and Kung 26 ]. But the MTSP technique usually needs an elaborate strategy in placing the thin plates to avoid the catastrophic spatial Kerr effect which can cause energy loss, beam deterioration and irreversible material damage[ Reference Vlasov, Petrishchev and Talanov 27 Reference Gao, Guo, Gao and Liang 30 ]. Vlasov et al. [ Reference Vlasov, Petrishchev and Talanov 27 ] proposed a periodical self-focusing system where a repeating (stationary) propagation is achieved by balancing the spatial nonlinear effect and beam divergence, which allows a high-efficiency spectral broadening without catastrophic self-focusing effect even though the peak power is far beyond the self-focusing critical power. Zhang et al. [ Reference Zhang, Fu, Zhu, Fan, Chen, Wang, Liu, Baltuska, Jin, Tian and Tao 28 ] introduced the Fresnel–Kirchhoff diffraction (FKD) integral to identify a more exact solution and demonstrated an eight-fold pulse compression with more than 85% efficiency. In our previous work, we proposed a simple Gaussian beam optics model to find the solution from a more practical perspective and demonstrated a 17-fold pulse compression with 94% efficiency[ Reference Gao, Guo, Gao and Liang 30 ].

In this work, we demonstrate dual-stage periodically placed thin fused silica plate post-compression used for the Innoslab laser system seeded by a fiber frontend, eventually implementing an efficient, compact and robust high-power ultrafast laser source with 64 fs pulse duration and 96 W average power at 175 kHz repetition rate. The high average power laser is provided by the compact Innoslab laser system, but the spatial quality degraded from the amplification process and temporal quality is undesirable because of the mismatched spectral phase between the stretcher and grating compressor. Not only is more than eight-fold pulse compression achieved with 94% transmission, but also the spatial mode and pulse quality are improved in the dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression. In the time domain, the final pulses are almost pedestal-free and quite close to the Fourier-transform-limited (FTL) pulse duration, because of the compensation for high-order dispersion during the nonlinear process. In the space domain, the increasingly circular and clean beam profile can be attributed to the spatial mode self-cleaning effect. A similar effect was reported in Ref. [Reference Zhang, Fu, Zhu, Fan, Chen, Wang, Liu, Baltuska, Jin, Tian and Tao28], which was considered as the effect of spatial self-organization of the laser beam and was previously observed in the nonlinear process of filamentation[ Reference Prade, Franco, Mysyrowicz, Couairon, Buersing, Eberle, Krenz, Seiffer and Vasseur 31 ], self-focusing collapse[ Reference Moll, Gaeta and Fibich 32 ] and multimode fibers[ Reference Krupa, Tonello, Shalaby, Fabert, Barthélémy, Millot, Wabnitz and Couderc 33 ]. This spatial improvement resulted in the increase of spatial energy concentration, which strengthens the application of the Innoslab laser system. These results demonstrate that periodically placed thin-solid-plate post-compression is competent to overcome the narrow bandwidth limitation of Yb-based lasers with exceptional efficiency and enable a high-quality laser output by the spatiotemporal self-cleaning effect. This work indicates that periodically placed thin-solid-plate post-compression is an efficient and economical complement for the Innoslab laser system and this robust and compact combination may be a promising scheme for generating higher-power few-cycle lasers with good spatial and temporal quality.

2 Experimental setup

As illustrated in Figure 1, efficient all-solid-state post-compression based on dual-stage periodically placed fused silica plates is used for a high-power ytterbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Yb:YAG) Innoslab laser system, which is seeded by a commercial all-fiber frontend, eventually yielding a high-power ultrafast laser output.

Figure 1 Schematic of the experimental setup. The high-power ultrafast laser output is achieved by dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression (blue shading) driven by a more than 100 W average power Yb:YAG Innoslab amplifier system (yellow shading).

The high-power amplifier system is described in detail in Ref. [Reference Gao, Guo, Gao, Huang, Tu and Liang34], which employs chirped pulse amplification, a spatial filter and a grating compressor. It delivers 102 W average power at 175 kHz repetition rate, corresponding to a pulse energy of approximately 0.6 mJ. The amplifier output spectrum is shown in Figure 3(a) detailed later, which is centered at 1030 nm and corresponds to an FTL pulse duration of 250 fs. The autocorrelation trace is shown in Figure 2(a), indicating 532 fs pulses with pedestals assuming a Lorentz pulse shape (APE GmbH, pulseCheck-NX50), which is larger than the FTL pulse duration (factor ~ 2.1). This can be attributed to the nonlinear effect of the fiber frontend and the mismatch in higher-order dispersion between the grating compressor and the CFBGs. The amplifier output beam quality is characterized as M 2 = 1.29 × 1.14 (Ophir BeamSquared), as shown in Figure 2(b). Although it is nearly diffraction-limited after spatial reshaping and filtering, a few high-order spatial modes and spatial distortion are difficult to completely eliminate, as evidenced by the images measured at different locations.

Figure 2 (a) Measured and Lorentz fitted autocorrelation traces and (b) the beam quality after the grating compressor.

Figure 3 (a) Spectra measured at the output of the frontend, amplifier and first-stage and second-stage spectral broadening. (b) Spectra across the final output beam profile.

The dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression consists of periodically placed thin-solid plates for nonlinear spectral broadening, focusing mirrors for mode-matching and chirped mirrors for dispersion compensation. The first-stage mode-matching is achieved by a curved mirror with 2500 mm radius of curvature (ROC), focusing the beam to a waist with 0.5 mm diameter. In the first-stage spectral broadening system, twelve 0.5-mm-thick fused silica plates are periodically arranged with a distance of 40 mm, that is, the period of the system. In order to maximize the transmission efficiency, these uncoated plates are all placed at the Brewster angle and the laser is linearly p-polarized. By placing the first plate 20 mm behind the waist, the stationary mode will propagate in the system at the balance of the self-focusing effect and diffraction when the full power is applied, which enables high-efficiency spectral broadening with high spatial quality. The second-stage mode-matching comprises ten 0.5-mm-thick fused silica plates at a period of 75 mm. The mode-matching condition is placing the first plate of the second-stage spectral broadening system 38 mm behind a 0.7-mm-diameter waist formed by a 4000-mm ROC curved mirror, corresponding to an estimated peak intensity of about 1 TW/cm2 on the plates which is similar to that of the first stage. The above-mentioned mode-matching condition and spectral broadening system design are all determined by the Gaussian beam optics model detailed in Ref. [Reference Gao, Guo, Gao and Liang30]. It identifies the stationary mode propagation by approximating the spatial Kerr effect of thin-solid plates as a nonlinear lens group. The focal length can be expressed by the following[ Reference Mansoor, Ali, David, Soileau and Eric 35 ]:

(1) $$\begin{align}f\approx \frac{hw^2}{4{n}_2{I}_0{l}_{\mathrm{eff}}},\\[-18pt]\nonumber\end{align}$$

where $w$ is the beam radius on the plates, ${n}_2$ is the nonlinear refractive index, ${I}_0$ is the peak intensity, $l$ is the nonlinear length per plate and $h$ is a correlator factor used to account for the higher-order terms ignored in the parabolic approximation. According to Ref. [Reference Sheik-Bahae, Said, Wei, Hagan and Stryland36], $h$ = 5 when B is close to 1, making it a general solution for low B-integral accumulation per plate situations. The strong space-time coupling can also be avoided in the low B-integral situation. In this dual-stage system, the estimated equivalent focal lengths are about 20 mm and 38 mm, respectively.

The spectrally broadened pulses are compressed by chirped mirrors where the first-stage compressor provides a total GDD of –17,500 fs2 and that of the second-stage compressor is –2000 fs2. The reason why numerous chirped mirrors are employed in the first-stage compressor is the massive residual GDD after the grating compressor. If the GDD is completely offset in the grating compressor, an obvious pedestal and many sidelobe pulses with considerable intensity will appear in addition to a narrower center-peak pulse, which are mainly caused by the residual third-order dispersion (TOD) and higher-order dispersion. During the nonlinear process, the nonlinearity induced dispersion can offset the residual high-order dispersion to some extent. According to the theory in Ref. [Reference Suda and Takeda37], the residual TOD after the nonlinear process decreases to a negligible level of 10−6–10−7 ps3 with the accumulation of nonlinear effect, eventually resulting in the pulse self-cleaning even though chirped mirrors only offset GDD. As a result, the dispersion to be compensated in the second-stage compressor is substantially reduced thanks to the pulse-cleaning in the first stage.

3 Results and discussion

The spectral evolution of the high-power ultrafast system is illustrated in Figure 3(a). An obvious gain narrowing is introduced as the power enhancement in the Yb:YAG Innoslab amplifier and the spectral bandwidth is narrowed to 2.9 nm (full width at half maximum, FWHM) from 8.3 nm (FWHM) of the seed. After the dual-stage periodically placed fused silica plates, the spectrum is significantly broadened due to the SPM effect. The first-stage spectral broadening basically offsets the impact of gain narrowing, extending the spectral range close to that of the seed. The second stage exhibits a stronger ability for spectral broadening, eventually broadening the spectral range to 990–1065 nm at the –20 dB level. Although the accumulated B-integral is similar, the spectral broadening effectiveness shown in the dual stage is quite different. This can be attributed to the massive residual chirp in the first-stage initial pulses, which weaken the capability of spectral broadening[ Reference Khazanov, Mironov and Mourou 38 ]. The asymmetry of spectral broadening is caused by the high-order dispersion of the initial pulses and the self-steepening effect[ Reference Suda and Takeda 37 , Reference Khazanov, Mironov and Mourou 38 ]. Figure 3(b) shows the good spatial homogeneity of spectral broadening, which is characterized by the spectra measured across the transverse beam profile of the final output beam at the location with a beam radius of about 6 mm, indicating that the spatial chirp is well controlled by the strategically placed thin plates.

The measured and Lorentz fitted autocorrelation traces characterized at the first-stage and second-stage post-compression are shown in Figure 4. After the first-stage post-compression, the pulses are actually compressed to 239 fs, which is larger than the FTL pulse duration (factor ~ 1.3) and corresponds to a compression factor of 2. Although the first-stage spectral broadening is slight, much shorter pulses can be achieved due to the nonlinear dispersion compensation. Compared with the initial pulse, the pulse width is closer to the FTL pulse duration and the pedestals are cleaned to some degree. As shown in Figure 4(b), the pedestal-free pulses of 64 fs are measured after the second-stage post-compression, corresponding to a four-fold pulse compression. The pulse width is very close to the FTL pulse duration (factor ~ 1.07), and the pedestals of the amplifier output pulses are almost completely cleaned. These results indicate that the dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression achieves not only a large-factor pulse compression but also a pulse-cleaning effect for the driving pulse quality stemming from the fiber frontend. The pulse-cleaning effect is introduced by the high-order dispersion compensation in the nonlinear process[ Reference Suda and Takeda 37 ], providing the ultrafast pulses with a pulse width closer to the FTL pulse duration and cleaner pedestals in the case in which only the negative GDD can be provided in the chirped-mirror compressor.

Figure 4 Measured and Lorentz fitted autocorrelation traces of (a) first-stage and (b) second-stage post-compression.

The beam quality and beam profile at different stages are illustrated in Figure 5. The first-stage output beam quality is measured to be M 2 = 1.42 × 1.28 and that of the second-stage output is M 2 = 1.53 × 1.38. The beam profiles are measured at the near field, focal spot and after focus, respectively. The M 2 factor increases slightly with the nonlinear propagation in the system, while the spatial mode is significantly improved. The beam profiles are no longer elliptical and the sidelobes and spatial distortion have been almost eliminated. A similar spatial mode self-cleaning effect in periodically placed thin-solid plates was also reported in Ref. [Reference Zhang, Fu, Zhu, Fan, Chen, Wang, Liu, Baltuska, Jin, Tian and Tao28] and previously observed in other nonlinear processes[ Reference Prade, Franco, Mysyrowicz, Couairon, Buersing, Eberle, Krenz, Seiffer and Vasseur 31 Reference Mikaelsson, Vogelsang, Guo, Sytcevich, Viotti, Langer, Cheng, Nandi, Jin, Olofsson, Weissenbilder, Mauritsson, L’Huillier, Gisselbrecht and Arnold 33 ]. According to the investigation of Ref. [Reference Zhang, Fu, Zhu, Fan, Chen, Wang, Liu, Baltuska, Jin, Tian and Tao28], the spatial mode self-cleaning effect only occurs during stationary mode propagation in the periodically placed thin-solid plates and can be attributed to the spatial self-organization effect in this waveguide-like propagation.

Figure 5 Beam quality measured after (a) first-stage and (b) second-stage post-compression.

To further investigate this nonlinear spatial mode self-cleaning effect, we measured the evolution of the beam profile at different locations and the final beam quality with the increase of power, as shown in Figure 6. The spatial mode self-cleaning effect can also be observed in this power-related evolution, which becomes more apparent as the power approaches the design conditions. The beam profile becomes increasingly circular and clean regardless whether at the near field, focal spot or after focus, which indicates an improvement of the spatial mode. Although the increase of the M 2 factor cannot be completely avoided due to the intensity-dependent spatial nonlinear effect, only a slight change would be introduced by controlling the accumulated B-integral per plate, whose impact can be ignored in applications[ Reference Russbueldt, Weitenberg, Schulte, Meyer, Meinhardt, Hoffmann and Poprawe 15 ]. Following the dual-stage post-compression, the final output average power is 96 W, demonstrating an exceptional efficiency of 94%. This high-efficiency spatial mode self-cleaning effect in the post-compression is quite suitable for the Innoslab laser system, which overcomes the limitations of narrow gain width and improves the spatial mode simultaneously. These results suggest that only this nonlinear effect used for the spatial filtering without additional spatial filtering modules such as a slit may be feasible, which would significantly enhance the overall efficiency and unleash the power-boost capability of this high-power laser system.

Figure 6 Evolution of the beam quality and beam profile at different locations with the output power.

4 Summary

In summary, we demonstrate efficient all-solid-state post-compression based on dual-stage periodically placed thin-solid plates. It is driven by a compact and robust Yb:YAG Innoslab laser system, which is seeded by a fiber frontend and yields a 100 W level average power with mJ level pulse energy. This economical all-solid-state post-compression not only achieves a more than eight-fold pulse compression with exceptional efficiency of 94%, but also improves the spatial mode and pulse quality of this high-power laser system, which are helpful in many applications. Eventually, an efficient, robust and compact high-power ultrafast laser source is implemented with 64 fs pulse duration, 96 W average power at 175 kHz repetition rate and good spatial mode and pulse quality. This work proves the potential of periodically placed thin-solid-plate post-compression combined with the Innoslab laser seeded on a fiber frontend in enabling the generation of an efficient, robust and compact laser source with higher-power, few-cycle pulses, and good spatial and temporal quality.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 62005298), the Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (No. 20SR014501) and Zhangjiang Laboratory.

References

Saule, T., Heinrich, S., Schötz, J., Lilienfein, N., Högner, M., deVries, O., Plötner, M., Weitenberg, J., Esser, D., Schulte, J., Russbueldt, P., Limpert, J., Kling, M. F., Kleineberg, U., and Pupeza, I., Nat. Commun. 10, 458 (2019).Google Scholar
Popmintchev, T., Chen, M.-C., Popmintchev, D., Arpin, P., Brown, S., Ališauskas, S., Andriukaitis, G., Balčiunas, T., Mücke, O. D., Pugzlys, A., Baltuška, A., Shim, B., Schrauth, S. E., Gaeta, A., Hernández-García, C., Plaja, L., Becker, A., Jaron-Becker, A., Murnane, M. M., and Kapteyn, H. C., Science 336, 1287 (2012).Google Scholar
Mikaelsson, S., Vogelsang, J., Guo, C., Sytcevich, I., Viotti, A.-L., Langer, F., Cheng, Y.-C., Nandi, S., Jin, W., Olofsson, A., Weissenbilder, R., Mauritsson, J., L’Huillier, A., Gisselbrecht, M., and Arnold, C. L., Nanophotonics 10, 117 (2021).Google Scholar
Stark, H., Buldt, J., Muller, M., Klenke, A., and Limpert, J., Opt. Lett. 46, 969 (2021).Google Scholar
Russbueldt, P., Mans, T., Weitenberg, J., Hoffmann, H. D., and Poprawe, R., Opt. Lett. 35, 4169 (2010).Google Scholar
Röcker, C., Loescher, A., Bienert, F., Villeval, P., Lupinski, D., Bauer, D., Killi, A., Graf, T., and Ahmed, M. Abdou, Opt. Lett. 45, 5522 (2020).Google Scholar
Nubbemeyer, T., Kaumanns, M., Ueffing, M., Gorjan, M., Alismail, A., Fattahi, H., Brons, J., Pronin, O., Barros, H. G., Major, Z., Metzger, T., Sutter, D., and Krausz, F., Opt. Lett. 42, 1381 (2017).Google Scholar
Mecseki, K., Windeler, M. K. R., Miahnahri, A., Robinson, J. S., Fraser, J. M., Fry, A. R., and Tavella, F., Opt. Lett. 44, 1257 (2019).Google Scholar
Schmidt, B. E., Hage, A., Mans, T., Légaré, F., and Wörner, H. J., Opt. Express 25, 17549 (2017).Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Guo, J., Huang, Y., Gao, Z., Gan, Z., Tu, Z., Liang, X., and Li, R., Opt. Lett. 48, 5328 (2023).Google Scholar
Balciunas, T., Fourcade-Dutin, C., Fan, G., Witting, T., Voronin, A. A., Zheltikov, A. M., Gerome, F., Paulus, G. G., Baltuska, A., and Benabid, F., Nat. Commun. 6, 6117 (2015).Google Scholar
Nagy, T., Hädrich, S., Simon, P., Blumenstein, A., Walther, N., Klas, R., Buldt, J., Stark, H., Breitkopf, S., Jójárt, P., Seres, I., Várallyay, Z., Eidam, T., and Limpert, J., Optica 6, 1423 (2019).Google Scholar
Ouillé, M., Vernier, A., Böhle, F., Bocoum, M., Jullien, A., Lozano, M., Rousseau, J.-P., Cheng, Z., Gustas, D., Blumenstein, A., Simon, P., Haessler, S., Faure, J., Nagy, T., and Lopez-Martens, R., Light Sci. Appl. 9, 47 (2020).Google Scholar
Pi, Z., Kim, H. Y., and Goulielmakis, E., Opt. Lett. 47, 5865 (2022).Google Scholar
Russbueldt, P., Weitenberg, J., Schulte, J., Meyer, R., Meinhardt, C., Hoffmann, H. D., and Poprawe, R., Opt. Lett. 44, 5222 (2019).Google Scholar
Kaumanns, M., Kormin, D., Nubbemeyer, T., Pervak, V., and Karsch, S., Opt. Lett. 46, 929 (2021).Google Scholar
Müller, M., Buldt, J., Stark, H., Grebing, C., and Limpert, J., Opt. Lett. 46, 2678 (2021).Google Scholar
Rajhans, S., Escoto, E., Khodakovskiy, N., Velpula, P. K., Farace, B., Grosse-Wortmann, U., Shalloo, R. J., Arnold, C. L., Põder, K., Osterhoff, J., Leemans, W. P., Hartl, I., and Heyl, C. M., Opt. Lett. 48, 4753 (2023).Google Scholar
Silletti, L., Wahid, A., Escoto, E., Balla, P., Rajhans, S., Horn, K., Winkelmann, L., Wanie, V., Trabattoni, A., Heyl, C. M., and Calegari, F., Opt. Lett. 48, 1842 (2023).Google Scholar
Fritsch, K., Poetzlberger, M., Pervak, V., Brons, J., and Pronin, O., Opt. Lett. 43, 4643 (2018).Google Scholar
Viotti, A.-L., Li, C., Arisholm, G., Winkelmann, L., Hartl, I., Heyl, C. M., and Seidel, M., Opt. Lett. 48, 984 (2023).Google Scholar
Beetar, J. E., Gholam-Mirzaei, S., and Chini, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 051102 (2018).Google Scholar
Tóth, S., Nagymihály, R. S., Seres, I., Lehotai, L., Csontos, J., Tóth, L. T., Geetha, P. P., Somoskői, T., Kajla, B., Abt, D., Pajer, V., Farkas, A., Mohácsi, Á., Börzsönyi, Á., and Osvay, K., Opt. Lett. 48, 57 (2023).Google Scholar
Lu, C.-H., Wu, W.-H., Kuo, S.-H., Guo, J.-Y., Chen, M.-C., Yang, S.-D., and Kung, A. H., Opt. Express 27, 15638 (2019).Google Scholar
Seo, M., Tsendsuren, K., Mitra, S., Kling, M., and Kim, D., Opt. Lett. 45, 367 (2020).Google Scholar
Lu, C.-H., Tsou, Y.-J., Chen, H.-Y., Chen, B.-H., Cheng, Y.-C., Yang, S.-D., Chen, M.-C., Hsu, C.-C., and Kung, A. H., Optica 1, 400 (2014).Google Scholar
Vlasov, S. N., Petrishchev, V. A., and Talanov, V. I., Appl. Opt. 9, 1486 (1970).Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Fu, Z., Zhu, B., Fan, G., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Baltuska, A., Jin, C., Tian, C., and Tao, Z., Light Sci. Appl. 10, 53 (2021).Google Scholar
Guo, J., Gao, Z., Sun, D., Du, X., Gao, Y., and Liang, X., High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 10, e10 (2022).Google Scholar
Gao, Z., Guo, J., Gao, Y., and Liang, X., Opt. Laser Technol. 175, 110714 (2024).Google Scholar
Prade, B., Franco, M., Mysyrowicz, A., Couairon, A., Buersing, H., Eberle, B., Krenz, M., Seiffer, D., and Vasseur, O., Opt. Lett. 31, 2601 (2006).Google Scholar
Moll, K. D., Gaeta, A. L., and Fibich, G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 203902 (2003).Google Scholar
Krupa, K., Tonello, A., Shalaby, B. M., Fabert, M., Barthélémy, A., Millot, G., Wabnitz, S., and Couderc, V., Nat. Photonics 11, 237 (2017).Google Scholar
Gao, Y., Guo, J., Gao, Z., Huang, Y., Tu, Z., and Liang, X., Opt. Laser Technol. 168, 109885 (2024).Google Scholar
Mansoor, S.-B., Ali, A. S., David, J. H., Soileau, M. J., and Eric, W. V. S., Opt. Eng. 30, 1228 (1991).Google Scholar
Sheik-Bahae, M., Said, A. A., Wei, T. H., Hagan, D. J., and Stryland, E. W. V., IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 26, 760 (1990).Google Scholar
Suda, A. and Takeda, T., Appl. Sci. 2, 549 (2012).Google Scholar
Khazanov, E. A., Mironov, S. Y., and Mourou, G., Phys.-Usp. 62, 1096 (2019).Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Schematic of the experimental setup. The high-power ultrafast laser output is achieved by dual-stage all-solid-state post-compression (blue shading) driven by a more than 100 W average power Yb:YAG Innoslab amplifier system (yellow shading).

Figure 1

Figure 2 (a) Measured and Lorentz fitted autocorrelation traces and (b) the beam quality after the grating compressor.

Figure 2

Figure 3 (a) Spectra measured at the output of the frontend, amplifier and first-stage and second-stage spectral broadening. (b) Spectra across the final output beam profile.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Measured and Lorentz fitted autocorrelation traces of (a) first-stage and (b) second-stage post-compression.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Beam quality measured after (a) first-stage and (b) second-stage post-compression.

Figure 5

Figure 6 Evolution of the beam quality and beam profile at different locations with the output power.