No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Posthumous Use of Sperm: Legal and Bioethical Reflections on Israeli Policy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2025
Extract
Bassan’s article on the posthumous use of sperm presents a complicated picture of Israeli law.1 On the one hand, as previous reviews show,2 Israel is unique in terms of the extent of this phenomenon. The number of applications to the courts to approve the use of sperm posthumously is substantial and has been increasing since the outbreak of the war on October 7. On the other hand, there is no clear legal policy in this area. In other words, Bassan’s article shows that the rights of relevant parties in this context are not adequately regulated. This, as elaborated below, is the result of a lack of primary legislation, together with disagreement among relevant policymakers. The outcome is feelings of frustration, confusion, and even anger among the deceased’s close relatives.3
Keywords
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics
References
Bassan, S., “Posthumous Sperm Use in Times of War: Ethics, Law and Society,” Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 52 no. 4 (2024): 866–875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simana, S., “Creating life after death: Should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased’s prior consent?” Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 5 (2018): 329– 354; R. Gilbar, E. Ram-Tiktin “It takes a village to raise a child: Solidarity in the courts — Judicial justification for posthumous use of sperm by bereaved parents,” Medical Law Review 28 no. 2 (2020).: 317–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“A heated discussion in the Health Committee between widows and bereaved parents: Who will make a decision about the use of the deceased’s sperm?,” The Knesset, July 2, 2004, (In Hebrew) https://main.knesset.gov.il/news/pressreleases/pages/press07.-2.24w.aspx.Google Scholar
Guidelines on harvesting sperm after death and its use (Attorney General of Isarel, 2003) (In Hebrew) https://fs.knesset.gov.il/25/Committees/25_cs_bg_3564413.pdf.Google Scholar
5. Jane Doe v. Jane Doe, Case number 7141/15, Nevo Legal Database (December 22, 2016) (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
Use of a deceased’s sperm for reproductive purposes Bill 2023, March 20, 2023 (In Hebrew), https://main.knesset.gov.il/Activity/Legislation/Laws/pages/lawbill.aspx?t=lawsuggestionssearch&lawitemid=2202920.Google Scholar
See Gilbar & Ram-Tiktin, supra note 2.Google Scholar
See Jane Doe v. Jane Doe, supra note 5, per Chief Justice Hayut.Google Scholar
Arad-Pinkas v. The committee for approving agreements for carrying embryos according to the Embryo Carrying Agreement Act (Agreement Approval and Status of the Newborn) 1996, Case number 781/15 Nevo Legal Database (February 27, 2020) (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
See Jane Doe v Jane Doe, supra note 5.Google Scholar
Jane Doe v. Ministry of Health, Case number 12977-01-14 (Kiryat Shmona Family Court), Nevo Legal Database (January 6, 2015) (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
Jane Doe v Assaf Harofe Hospital, Case number 378/20, Nevo Legal Database (June 3, 2020), (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
A. Libsker, “A non-empty space,” Calcalist daily, November 9, 2023 (In Hebrew), https://newmedia.calcalist.co.il/magazine-09-11-23/m03.html.Google Scholar
The Knesset, supra note 3.Google Scholar
B. Savitsky, T. Eldar-Geva, and R. Shvartsur, “Israeli men’s attitudes toward posthumous reproduction and prior consent amid ongoing armed conflict,” Andrology (2024), https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13757. Epub ahead of print; Stein, A. et al., “Single men’s attitudes towards posthumous use of their sperm cryopreserved due to illness in Israel,” Andrology 12 no. 2 (2024): 380–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
N. Spigel, “Promoting the Bill which regulates use of sperm posthumously awaits the Chief Rabi’s position,” Haaretz, February 7, 2024, (In Hebrew) https://www.haaretz.co.il/news/politi/2024-02-07/ty-article/0000018d-8374-dfd5-adff-dbf52c220000; MK Merav Ben-Ari, “Constitutional and ethical aspects of preserving the deceased’s sperm,” Reichman University, YouTube, May 9, 2024, 8 minutes 53 seconds (In Hebrew), https://youtu.be/1xLIDXR0If8?si=1Us1PR-zV-Z6PMPi.Google Scholar
Z. Triger, “On the regulation of fertility services in Israel,” in Law, Society and Culture, ed. I. Blank, D. Levi-Faor, R. Kreitner (Tel-Aviv University Press), 269–309 (In Hebrew); Noy, S. (Kenyon), Mishori, D., and Hashash, Y. “Geese that produce golden eggs: Eggs Donation Bill 2007,”
Medicine and Law 36 (2007): 161–179 (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
Gutmann, A., Thompson, D., Why deliberative democracy? (Princeton University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self
, ed. Mackenzie, C., and Stoljar, N. (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Ram-Tiktin, E., Gilbar, R., “Solidarity as a theoretical framework for posthumous assisted reproduction and the case of bereaved parents.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22 (2019): 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See A-G guidelines, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Lindemann-Nelson, H., Lindeman-Nelson, J., The patient in the family (Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
24. Hardwig, J. “What about the family?” in Is there a duty to die and other essays in bioethics, ed. Hardwig, J. (Routledge, 2000): 29–45.Google Scholar
See Gilbar & Ram-Tiktin, supra note 2.Google Scholar
R. Landau, “Planned Orphanhood,” in Dilemmas in Ethics 220 (Raphael Cohen-Almagor ed., 2002) (In Hebrew); Landau, R., “Posthumous sperm retrieval for the purpose of later insemination or IVF in Israel: An ethical and psychosocial critique,” Human Reproduction 19 no. 9 (2004): 1952, 1953.Google Scholar
Heyd, D., “Embryonic injuries: Can you sue if you wouldn’t have been born, or born different?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 96 no. 1 (2021): 145–171.Google Scholar
Public Health (In Vitro Fertilization) Regulations 1986, Nevo Legal Database (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
Embryo Carrying Agreement (Agreement Approval and Status of the Newborn) Act 1996, Nevo Legal Database (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
See Arad-Pinkas, supra note 9.Google Scholar
See Simana, supra note 2.Google Scholar