Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T16:42:40.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relativity, categories and principles in the diuisio aristotelea 67M/32DL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2023

Roberto Granieri
Roberto Granieri*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Diuisio Aristotelea 67M/32DL draws a distinction between two categories of beings, per se and relatives. I defend three main theses. First, that the relation of dependence characterizing the members of the latter category is modal and symmetrical in nature and, accordingly, the per se-relatives contrast cannot be equivalent to the substance-accidents contrast. Second, that the type of relativity relevant to this diuisio is both ontological and semantic in nature (but with different emphases depending on the version of the diuisio considered). Third, I argue, against a widespread opinion, that the last line of the DL version of the diuisio does not concern metaphysical principles. Here I also compare the diuisio to other Early Academic bicategorial schemes and show that they differ from one another significantly, especially as far as the alleged connection between categories and metaphysical principles is concerned.

Keywords

Diuisiones Aristoteleaecategoriesrelativitymodalityprinciples
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Volume 142 , November 2022 , pp. 204 - 218
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ademollo, F. (2013) ‘Plato’s conception of the forms: some remarks’, in Chiaradonna, R. and Galluzzo, G. (eds), Universals in Ancient Philosophy (Pisa) 41–86 Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1974) ‘Forms and first principles’, Phronesis 3, 257–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H., Atkinson, M., Share, M. and Mueller, I. (2012) Simplicius: On Aristotle Physics 1.5–9 (London)Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988–1990) ‘Scepticism and relativity’, Philosophical Studies 32, 1–31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis “Theaetetum”’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, Parte III: Commentari (Florence) 227–562 Google Scholar
Beekes, R. (2010) Etymological Dictionary of Greek. 1. (Leiden and Boston)Google Scholar
Berti, E. (1962) La filosofia del primo Aristotele (Padua)Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2004) Aristotele. Dalla dialettica alla filosofia prima (Milan) 1st edition Padua 1977Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2005) ‘Presentazione’, in Rossitto, C., Aristotele ed altri: Divisioni (Milan) 5–26 Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2012) Sumphilosophein. La vita nell’Accademia di Platone (Rome and Bari)Google Scholar
Brock, S.P. (2014) ‘An abbreviated Syriac version of Ps.-Aristotle, De virtutibus et vitiis and Divisiones ’, in Coda, E. and Martini Bonadeo, C. (eds), De l’Antiquité tardive au Moyen Âge: études de logique aristotélicienne et de philosophie grecque, syriaque, arabe et latine offertes à Henri Hugonnard-Roche (Paris) 94–101 Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Oxford)Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius: On Aristotle’s Categories 1–4 (Ithaca)Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2017) ‘Being-said-of in Aristotle’s Categories ’, RFN 3, 531–56Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1997) ‘Ricerche sulla trasmissione delle Divisioni aristoteliche’, in Algra, K.A., van der Horst, P.W. and Runia, D.T. (eds), Polyhistor: Studies in the History of Historiography of Ancient Philosophy (Leiden) 145–65Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2013) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Cambridge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2016a) ‘Le Divisiones quae vulgo dicuntur Aristoteleae. Storia del testo e edizione delle Recensiones Marciana, Florentina e Leidensis ’, Studia Graeco-Arabica 6, 1–58 Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (2016b) ‘Elementi “diairetici” nella sezione iniziale dell’Anonymus Londiniensis (PBrLibr inv. 137 I-IV 17)’, in Casanova, A., Messeri, G. and Pintaudi, R. (eds), E sì d’amici pieno: Omaggio di studiosi italiani a G. Bastianini per il suo settantesimo compleanno (Florence) 199–205 Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. and Marjiani, I. (2017) ‘La tradizione siriaca e araba delle cosiddette Divisiones Aristoteleae. Analisi e commento della versione siriaca (ed. Brock) e delle due traduzioni arabe (ed. Kellermann-Rost)’, Studia Graeco-Arabica 7, 1–55 Google Scholar
Duncombe, M. (2012) ‘Plato’s absolute and relative categories at Sophist 255c14’, AncPhil 32, 73–86 Google Scholar
El Murr, D. (2014) ‘Aὐτὸ καθ’ αὑτό: la genèse et le sens d’un philosophème platonicien’, in Doucet, D. and Koch, I. (eds), Autos, idipsum: aspects de l’identité d’Homère à Augustin (Aix-en-Provence) 39–56 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1993) On Ideas (Oxford)Google Scholar
Frisk, H. (1960) Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch 1 (Heidelberg)Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. (1963) Platons Ungeschriebene Lehre (Stuttgart)Google Scholar
Gercke, A. (1891) ‘Ursprung der aristotelischen Kategorien’, AGPh 4, 224–41Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1987) Aristotelis Opera III (Berlin and New York)Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.O. (1999) Diogène Laërce. Vies et doctrines des philosophes illustres (Paris)Google Scholar
Granieri, R. (2021) ‘Xenocrates and the two-category scheme’, Apeiron 54, 261–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granieri, R. (forthcoming) ‘Hermodorus of Syracuse and Sextus Empiricus’ “Pythagoreans” on Categories and Principles’, CQ Google Scholar
Hambruch, E. (1904) Logische Regeln der Platonischen Schule in der Aristotelischen Topik (Berlin)Google Scholar
Havrda, M. (2017) The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria: Early Christian Reception of Greek Scientific Methodology (Leiden and Boston)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1979) Studi sull’Accademia platonica antica (Florence)Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1982) Senocrate-Ermodoro: Frammenti (Naples)Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1992) ‘Sesto, Platone, l’Accademia antica e i Pitagorici’, Elenchos 13, 119–67Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1998) ‘ Testimonia Platonica: per una raccolta delle principali testimonianze sui λϵγόμϵνα ἄγραφα δόγματα di Platone: Testimonianze di età ellenistica e di età imperiale’, RAL Supplement 9.10, fasc. 1, 395, 1–120 Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (2012) Senocrate e Ermodoro: Testimonianze e frammenti (ed. by Dorandi, T.) (Pisa)Google Scholar
Kellermann-Rost, M. (1965) Ein pseudoaristotelischer Traktat über die Tugend: Edition und Übersetzung der arabischen Fassungen des Abū Qurra und des Ibn aṬ-Ṭayyib (Ph.D. Diss. Erlangen)Google Scholar
Krämer, H. (1959) Arete bei Platon und Aristoteles (Heidelberg)Google Scholar
Krämer, H. (1971) Platonismus und Hellenistische Philosophie (Berlin and New York)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, H. (1982) Platone e i fondamenti della metafisica (Milan)Google Scholar
Leigh, F. (2012) ‘Modes of being at Sophist 255c–e’, Phronesis 57, 1–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manetti, D. (2011) Anonymus Londiniensis: De medicina (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992a) ‘ Physikai doxai e Problemata physica da Aristotele ad Aezio (ed oltre)’, in Battegazzore, A.M. (ed.), Dimostrazione, argomentazione dialettica e argomentazione retorica nel pensiero antico (Genova) 311–82 (repr. with additions in J. Mansfeld and D.T. Runia (2010) Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer 3 (Leiden and Boston) 33–98)Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992b) Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy (Leiden)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, E. (1984) La sezione linguistica del Peri hermeneias di Aristotele (Florence)Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (1906) Divisiones quae vulgo dicuntur Aristoteleae (Leipzig)Google Scholar
Owen, G.E.L. (1957) ‘A proof in the Peri Ideôn ’, JHS 77, 103–11 (repr. in G.E.L. Owen (1986) Logic, Science and Metaphysics (ed. by Nussbaum, M.) (Ithaca) 165–78)Google Scholar
Pasquali, G. (1910) ‘Doxographica aus Basiliusscholien’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, phil.-hist. Kl., 194–228 (repr. in G. Pasquali (1986) Scritti filologici. I. Letteratura greca (ed. by F. Bornmann, G. Pascucci and S. Timpanaro) (Florence) 539–74)Google Scholar
Ricciardetto, A. (2016) L’Anonyme de Londres (P. Lit. Lond. 165, Brit. Libr. Inv. 137). Édition et traduction d’un papyrus grec médical du Ier siècle après J.-C. (Paris)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossitto, C. (2005) Aristotele ed altri: Divisioni (Milan) (1st edition Padua 1984)Google Scholar
Smyth, H.W. (1920) Greek Grammar for Colleges (New York)Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1931) ‘Der Ursprung der aristotelischen Kategorienlehre’, AGPh 40, 449–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadro, A. (1999) Aristotele: De interpretatione (Naples)Google Scholar