Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:02:15.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lyman Alpha Emitting Galaxies in the Nearby Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2015

Matthew Hayes*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Centre, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Lyman alpha emission line (Lyα) of neutral hydrogen (Hi) is intrinsically the brightest emission feature in the spectrum of astrophysical nebulae, making it a very attractive observational feature with which to survey galaxies. Moreover as an ultraviolet resonance line, Lyα possesses several unique characteristics that make it useful to study the properties of the interstellar medium and ionising stellar population at all cosmic epochs. In this review, I present a summary of Lyα observations of galaxies in the nearby universe. By ultraviolet continuum selection, at the magnitudes reachable with current facilities, only ≈ 5% of the local galaxy population shows a Lyα equivalent width (WLyα) that exceeds 20 Å. This fraction increases dramatically at higher redshifts, but only in the local universe can we study galaxies in detail and assemble unprecedented multi-wavelength datasets. I discuss many local Lyα observations, showing that when galaxies show net Lyα emission, they ubiquitously also produce large-scale halos of scattered Lyα, that dominate the integrated luminosity. Concerning global measurements, we discuss how WLyα and the Lyα escape fraction (fLyαesc) are higher (WLyα ≳ 20 Å and fLyαesc ≳ 10%) in galaxies that represent the less massive and younger end of the distribution for local objects. This is connected with various properties, such that Lyα-emitting galaxies have lower metal abundances (median value of 12 + log(O/H) ~ 8.1) and dust reddening. However, the presence of galactic outflows/winds is also vital to Doppler shift the Lyα line out of resonance with the atomic gas, and high WLyα is found only among galaxies with winds faster than ~ 50 km s−1. The empirical evidence is then assembled into a coherent picture, and the requirement for star-formation-driven feedback is discussed in the context of an evolutionary sequence where the interstellar medium is accelerated and/or subject to hydrodynamical instabilities, which reduce the scattering of Lyα. Concluding remarks take the form of perspectives upon future developments, and the most pressing questions that can be answered by observation.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Australia 2015 

1 INTRODUCTION

The Lyman alpha (Lyα) emission line of atomic hydrogen (Hi) is intrinsically the most luminous spectral emission feature in astrophysical nebulae. It is produced by the spontaneous decay from the first excited state to the ground state (n = 2 → 1, where n is the principle quantum number), where the energy difference between the levels dictates a photon energy of 10.2 eV, or wavelength λ = 1215.67 Å. After the capture of an electron in ionised gas, the transition probabilities of the following radiative cascade are such that 68% of recombinations involve the production of a Lyα photon (Dijkstra Reference Dijkstra2014). Thus if all ionising photons had an energy slightly above the ionisation edge of Hi, ≈ 50% of the total ionising energy would be reprocessed into the Lyα line. Because the line may be intrinsically so luminous, Lyα was initially proposed as the spectral beacon by which to identify the first generations of primeval galaxies almost five decades ago (Partridge & Peebles Reference Partridge and Peebles1967).

Lyα plays a pivotal role in contemporary astrophysics, where it is used to identify high-redshift (z) star-forming galaxies by either narrow-band filter observations or spectroscopic techniques, and frequently to confirm the redshift of candidate galaxies selected by other methods. Indeed, the recognition that Lyα observations have attained makes the detection of Lyα a primary science goal for many new instruments on large telescopes: first light has recently been seen by HyperSuprime Cam (HSC, Takada Reference Takada, Kawai and Nagataki2010) at the Subaru Telescope, the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE, Bacon et al. Reference Bacon2010) at ESO’s Very Large Telescope, and the Cosmic Web Imager (CWI, Martin et al. Reference Martin2010) at Palomar. Furthermore, the Hobby Eberly Dark Energy EXperiment (HETDEX, Hill et al. Reference Hill, Kodama, Yamada and Aoki2008) is expected to find on the order of 106 Lyα galaxies, and Lyα detection is among the science goals for spectroscopic instruments on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and all plans for Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs).

The above introductory paragraphs on Lyα production are incomplete. While Lyα forms in astrophysical nebulae at the stated intensities, the transition is a resonant one, and Lyα is also absorbed by Hi in the same transition. After absorption to the 2P level (in the absence of electron collisions), there is no alternative but for the electron to de-excite through Lyα. The optical depth of Hi, as seen in the core of the absorption line, is given by $\tau _0 \approx 3\times 10^{-14} \sqrt{10^4 / T}\cdot N_\mathrm{HI}$, where T is the temperature of the gas and N Hi the column density in cm−2 (Verhamme, Schaerer, & Maselli Reference Verhamme, Schaerer and Maselli2006). Thus at the limiting temperatures to which hydrogen can remain neutral, Hi becomes optically thick to Lyα at N HI ≈ 3 × 1013 cm−2. Assuming a number density of 1 atom per cubic cm, a cloud will exceed τ = 1 when its diameter exceeds 10−5 pc, or just 2 AU. Taking the Milky Way as an example, there are very few sightlines through which N Hi drops below 1020 cm−2 (Kalberla et al. Reference Kalberla, Burton, Hartmann, Arnal, Bajaja, Morras and Pöppel2005), implying that Lyα would almost always see upwards of 106 optical depths.

The upshot is that in most galaxies, Lyα undergoes a radiative transfer process: photons scatter until they either escape from the galaxy or are absorbed by a dust grain, and dust extinction is also strongest in the far-ultraviolet (FUV). This transfer may be thought of as a diffusion-like process, where photons take random walks in both physical and frequency space (Osterbrock Reference Osterbrock1962). The path taken by Lyα is entirely regulated by the distribution of Hi that it encounters and must traverse, which in turn determines the likelihood that Lyα will encounter dust. Fortunately Lyα may see a significantly lower optical depth if it is shifted in frequency or the Hi is moving; the former can occur either after many scattering events as it diffuses in frequency through the redistribution profile, while the latter may happen after scattering in Hi that is itself kinematically offset from the Hii media where the Lyα formed. Ultimately, the emitted Lyα luminosity (also its equivalent width, EW, and departure from intrinsic Lyα/Hα ratio) will be a function of Hi distribution, gas kinematics, dust content, and galaxy viewing angle.

1.1 Key applications of Lyman alpha

Lyα transfer makes it hard to interpret the observed Lyα flux and EW from an individual galaxy, because the escape fraction, f Lyαesc, is difficult to predict for given configuration. However the transfer process, and the sensitivity of Lyα to different interstellar medium (ISM) properties, is also one of the major advantages of the transition. I now outline some key applications.

  1. (a) The evolution of galaxies. The fraction of galaxies with W Lyα ≳ 20 Å (the canonical definition of a Lyα-emitter, LAE), at absolute UV magnitudes brighter than −18, is just 5% in the nearby universe (Cowie, Barger, & Hu Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010), where LAEs are rare. However this fraction increases strongly with increasing redshift, to ~ 25% at z ≈ 3 (Shapley et al. Reference Shapley, Steidel, Pettini and Adelberger2003) to over 50% at z = 6–6.5 (Stark et al. Reference Stark, Ellis, Chiu, Ouchi and Bunker2010; Curtis-Lake et al. Reference Curtis-Lake2012). f Lyαesc evolves even more strongly over the same redshift range (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Schaerer, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Atek and Kunth2011; Blanc et al. Reference Blanc2011). This monotonic evolution, that spans a factor of 100 in f Lyαesc, is a key result of many Lyα surveys but has no conclusive explanation. Dust and Hi covering have both been suggested, and the answer must indeed lie among the quantities mentioned above, or combinations thereof, in the co-evolving properties of stars, gas, and dust.

  2. (b) The Epoch of Reionisation. Lyα emission offers a unique opportunity to study the ionisation state of intergalactic medium (IGM) at an epoch where other methods – e.g. the Gunn–Peterson trough in Quasi Stellar Objects (QSO) spectra and Thompson scattering of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) – are insensitive. The LAE fraction and f Lyαesc evolution discussed above reverses after z ~ 6.5, decreasing to ≲ 20% (e.g. Pentericci et al. Reference Pentericci2014) at z ~ 7. Possible interpretations include an increase in the ionising photon escape fraction (Dijkstra & Jeeson-Daniel Reference Dijkstra and Jeeson-Daniel2013, which is anyway needed for reionisation), but also that an increasingly neutral IGM starts to absorb the Lyα produced by the galaxies themselves. Disentangling the scenarios requires more information and solid constraints on the reionisation history and topology require much larger samples (e.g. Jensen et al. Reference Jensen, Hayes, Iliev, Laursen, Mellema and Zackrisson2014), but these will become available in the coming years with HSC. Moreover, as the IGM becomes neutral, the damping wing of Hi Lyα absorption may begin to affect the profile shape of the Lyα line that is transmitted, giving Lyα another unique application.

  3. (c) Galaxy kinematics. Lyα scatters coherently in the rest-frame of the Hi atom, and at scattering events is shifted in frequency by the velocity of the scattering medium. Thus as Lyα may escape from galaxies because of frequency shifts, the kinematic structure of the atomic gas becomes imprinted onto the line. This manifests as both a redshift (for outflowing gas) of the centroid of the main emission peak (e.g. Hashimoto et al. Reference Hashimoto, Ouchi, Shimasaku, Ono, Nakajima, Rauch, Lee and Okamura2013) and also as characteristic features that modify the shape of the line profile (e.g. Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Schaerer, Atek and Tapken2008). While there are many probes of kinematics in astrophysics, nebular line kinematics exclusively traces the warm ionised medium. Lyα, on the other hand, is shaped by kinematic differences between Hii (production) and Hi (scattering) media. Moreover Lyα is intrinsically very bright, and can be seen redshifted from the most distant galaxies. This again provides unique insights into the evolution of the ISM of galaxies, which can only feasibly be done with Lyα.

  4. (d) Atomic gas surrounding galaxies. As well as modifying the line profile, scattering also changes the surface brightness profile of emitted Lyα (Steidel et al. Reference Steidel, Bogosavljević, Shapley, Kollmeier, Reddy, Erb and Pettini2011; Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2013). The mechanisms by which galaxies obtain the gas they need to fuel star formation is one of the most pressing issues in extragalactic science (e.g. Kereš et al. Reference Kereš, Katz, Weinberg and Davé2005; Dekel et al. Reference Dekel2009), and necessitates a knowledge of the Hi distribution outside of star-forming regions and into the circumgalactic medium (CGM). Probing this circumgalactic Hi is observationally very challenging. In principle, it can be done by λ = 21 cm observations of Hi directly, but current telescopes cannot push such techniques beyond the very local universe. An alternative is to use absorption spectroscopy of background QSOs that pierce galaxy halos at different impact factors, enabling us to measure Hi temperatures, densities, and kinematics (e.g. Lanzetta et al. Reference Lanzetta, Bowen, Tytler and Webb1995; Tumlinson et al. Reference Tumlinson2013; Danforth et al. Reference Danforth2014). Unfortunately, appropriately bright QSOs are rare and thus such studies, while rich with information, are limited to statistical investigations of the average galaxy. A promising third method is to illuminate the circumgalactic Hi with Lyα produced in the central star-forming regions. Indeed, Lyα is perfect for such an application, being both the brightest intrinsic emission line, and being resonant in precisely the medium we need in order to image the CGM.

1.2 Lyman alpha observations of the nearby universe – this review

Section 1.1 presents the main astrophysical applications of Lyα emission, both as a diagnostic of galaxies themselves and the IGM. The key difficulties of observing high-z galaxies are that fluxes are low and high signal-to-noise data are hard to obtain, that spatial information is minimal or absent, and that important features are redshifted away from atmospheric transmission windows. In the local universe, surface brightness is higher by a factor of (1 + z)3, and spatial sampling can become almost arbitrarily high. Moreover, only in the local universe can we assemble the complete set of multi-wavelength observations, including but not limited to, all the continuum bands that probe both hot and cold stars, emission lines that provide a wealth of intrinsic diagnostics of the nebulae in which Lyα forms, direct measurements of far-infrared (FIR) continuum for both hot and cold dust, direct Hi measurements at λ = 21 cm, X-ray observations of coronal gas, and many more.

Indeed, the science objectives discussed in Section 1.1 can, with the exception of reionisation, all be undertaken in the low-z universe. Here Lyα provides a unique suite of information about the ISM of galaxies that still cannot be extracted using other techniques. This makes Lyα an import observable to obtain in any thorough study of (particularly star-forming) local galaxies. Moreover, the question can be inverted: when as much information on the dust and gas content (distribution, kinematics, etc.) has been assembled, observations of Lyα can then be used to calibrate our understanding of the Lyα transport mechanisms, and the effects of dust, gas, star-formation evolutionary stage may all be disentangled. This is the way, for example, we will assemble the relevant knowledge to interpret the evolution of the Lyα fraction with redshift. In turn, we will be able to calibrate Lyα for high-z galaxy surveys, which will soon deliver ~ 1 million objects, by using local LAEs as analogues – laboratories in which to dissect in detail the processes ongoing in high-z systems. Local Lyα observations will allow us to read kinematic information off the line profile and conversely to predict the flux, EW, and line profile shapes, precisely as needed to address topics such as cosmic reionisation that really hinge upon knowing the spectral profile. Indeed, this is one of the major legacies established by our ultraviolet (UV) satellites; the only difficulties are that such satellites are both expensive and competitive.

This review focuses mainly upon empirical studies of Lyα emission and absorption in star-forming galaxies in the local universe. Somewhat arbitrarily, I have defined the ‘local universe’ to mean redshifts where space-based facilities are needed to observe Lyα. In principle this means z ≲ 1.7 or so, but the most distant samples discussed are at z ~ 1, and thus we are considering roughly the latter half of cosmic time. Where appropriate I may concentrate upon what galaxies teach us about Lyα, or about what Lyα teaches us about galaxies. The layout of the remainder is as follows:

  1. (a) In Section 3, I present a brief history of Lyα observations in the local universe, which were ongoing at a time when the first generations of high-z searches were also beginning. This concerns the first vacuum UV observations of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and star-forming galaxies using low dispersion spectrographs.

  2. (b) In Section 4, we discuss how the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) changed the landscape by providing high-resolution spectra that can resolve the Lyα feature and interstellar absorption lines, thereby probing atomic gas kinematics and covering.

  3. (c) Section 5 is concerned with Lyα imaging observations, also from HST, that simultaneously resolve very fine spatial structures and reveal large-scale, diffuse Lyα halos.

  4. (d) In Section 6, I present a large number of key results from survey data, that aim to answer questions about how various globally measured properties influence Lyα emission and under what conditions Lyα can be expected to be bright.

    Sections 36 aim to establish empirically how we have arrived at the current state-of-the-art.

  5. (e) In Section 7, I then synthesise all the observational data from the previous sections, and introduce some more speculative discussion about how various processes fit together.

  6. (f) Finally, I do not present explicit conclusions, but close the review in Section 8 with a number of perspectives and pressing open questions. These concern future observations and uses of Lyα at both low- and intermediate-z, with a view to understanding galaxy formation.

2 LYMAN ALPHA OBSERVABLES

The literature makes use of several observable quantities that pertain to Lyα, that relate to how much escapes or aim to illustrate how ‘strong’ the feature is. This section summarises some of these quantities and conventions, and lists several caveats that may be considered while reading.

2.1 Flux, luminosity, and equivalent width

Lyα is mainly produced by recombinations in photoionised nebulae, where under standard Case B assumptions 68% of ionising photons absorbed by hydrogen are reprocessed into Lyα in the following radiative cascade (See Dijkstra Reference Dijkstra2014 for an intuitive explanation). For continuously star-forming galaxies, with constant star formation rate (SFR), the Lyα EW is about 80Å. For very young systems, the EW peaks around 300Å (Charlot & Fall Reference Charlot and Fall1993), while very high EWs that exceed 1000 Å may in principle be expected for very low-metallicity, population iii stellar systems (Schaerer Reference Schaerer2003; Raiter, Schaerer, & Fosbury Reference Raiter, Schaerer and Fosbury2010). Naturally if the SFR is declining, the intrinsic Lyα EW may take any value less than these, and it is worth noting that for a simple stellar population (SSP), W Lyα exceeds 20 Å only during the first 6 Myr (Leitherer et al. Reference Leitherer1999).

Measuring the flux and EW of most emission lines is straightforward. However for Lyα, this is not necessarily so and these quantities may depend upon both methodology and definition. As a resonant transition, both nebular Lyα and continuum radiation with wavelength λ = 1216 Å may be absorbed by Hi. Depending upon the column density, this absorption may reach EWs of several tens of Å, which is a substantial fraction of the nebular flux. Fluxes measured in a given aperture may or may not be reduced by this amount. Narrow-band imaging, for example, needs to be continuum-subtracted and therefore measures the sum of nebular emission and absorption. Spectroscopic observations, on the other hand, may enable the observer to isolate the components and separate nebular emission from ISM absorption, should this be the goal of the measurement. However, even in spectroscopic mode isolating the emission-only flux depends upon the spectral resolution, and the separation will be much easier with high-resolution slit spectrographs than low-resolution survey telescopes.

Not only is Lyα absorbed in the ISM but also, depending on temperature and the properties of their winds, in the atmospheres of stars. For the hottest O stars Lyα EWs may be negligible, but as the population ages or the SFR declines, the dominant source of UV continuum will shift to progressively cooler stars. Valls-Gabaud (Reference Valls-Gabaud1993) showed that Lyα measurements from some local galaxies may be subject to significant uncertainties from stellar absorption, and recent models by Peña-Guerrero & Leitherer (Reference Peña-Guerrero and Leitherer2013) demonstrate that stellar Lyα absorption may reach EWs of −30 Å. For example, the effect of stellar absorption may also vary from O-star-dominated systems where the nebular EW is high and the stellar feature is negligible, to later B-star systems where the reverse is true. The stellar feature may therefore shorten the timescale over which an episode of star formation remains bright in Lyα, and the effect may even be seen on resolved scales within a galaxy.

2.2 Lyα/Balmer ratios and escape fraction

EWs have the advantage that only a short range in wavelength is needed to make the measurement, over which the effects of interstellar dust (reddening curve, total extinction) should have a negligible effect. As discussed above, the evolutionary phase of star formation dominates the intrinsic EW. Lyα/Balmer line ratios, however, may also be used as a measure of the strength of Lyα, and because the intrinsic ratios are limited to a narrow range of values, have other advantages. For example the Hα line (λ = 6564.61 Å) is a well-known, calibrated tracer of current star formation activity in nearby galaxies (e.g. Kennicutt Reference Kennicutt1983). For Case B nebulae at temperatures in the range 5 000–20 000 K and electron density in the range n e = 102–104 cm−3, the Lyα/Hα ratio ranges between 8.1 and 11.6 (Hummer & Storey Reference Hummer and Storey1987). Thus, deviations from the intrinsic line ratios encode information about the Hi scattering and dust absorption. While different authors do tend to adopt slightly different values, the range of permitted values is relatively narrow. For this review, we will adopt the value of Lyα/Hα = 8.7, which for T = 104 K gas corresponds to ne ≈ 350 cm−3 s, and as a convention can be traced back to at least Hu, Cowie, & McMahon (Reference Hu, Cowie and McMahon1998).

Frequently, we make reference to the Lyα escape fraction (f Lyαesc), in an effort to find a quantity that most closely reflects the combined impact that gas and dust have on suppressing the emission line. We define f Lyαesc as the ratio of the emitted Lyα luminosity to that intrinsically produced, but naturally a number of assumptions can enter our estimates of the intrinsic value. The most robust estimates of f Lyαesc will naturally come from comparing Lyα with other hydrogen recombination lines, where in practice Hα is the strongest and easiest to observe. Assuming that Hα is unobscured, f Lyαesc will simply be the observed Lyα/Hα ratio divided by its intrinsic case B value (8.7 as mentioned above). Of course, Hα can also be significantly absorbed by dust, and in local ‘normal’ galaxies suffers about 1 mag of extinction on average (Kennicutt & Kent Reference Kennicutt and Kent1983). Obviously, redder hydrogen lines would be better as they suffer less extinction but also become systematically weaker in flux, and become harder to observe in the infrared. Radio recombination lines would be ideal, suffering no extinction at all, but are even more challenging to observe beyond the very local universe. Thus often the best route to f Lyαesc is to dust-correct Hα using the Hβ line, which should recover all the star formation down to moderate optical depths (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Leitherer and Petrosian2005; Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Hayes, Deharveng, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2009a). However, when Hα becomes very optically thick, in very dusty star-forming galaxies (e.g. Martin et al. Reference Martin, Dijkstra, Henry, Soto, Danforth and Wong2015), even dust-corrected Hα traces only a small fraction of the true ionised gas, making the inferred escape fraction prone to strong biases. In such instances, one may do better by comparing the Lyα-derived SFR with that estimated from dust emission in the FIR, under the assumption that systematic errors on the SFR calibrations are smaller than the fraction of Hα that is recoverable. In the highest optical depth regimes, this is probably true.

3 THE FIRST LOW-REDSHIFT LYMAN ALPHA OBSERVATIONS

The major contributing observatories in this field are just three: the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE), the HST, and the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX), while piecemeal observations have been contributed by other telescopes. Rest-frame FUV observations began with the IUE in 1977, HST started operation just 13 years later and is still returning Lyα data at z < 1 some 25 years on; the demarcation between history and present is arbitrary of course. For the sake of this review, I will adopt the pre-HST era, which is almost exclusively the IUE and thus is also restricted by method to spectrophotometry of pre-selected targets. In the ‘modern’ era, we then have two main operational tools. First HST, which like IUE performs pointed observations of individual targets, but in doing so yields data that are always rich with features since both spatial and spectral resolutions are significantly higher. Secondly, the GALEX satellite is similar to the IUE in resolving power (R) but its strength comes instead from its 1.2° field of view, which provided the survey efficiency to yield the statistical significance that was not available at low-z with any other telescope.

3.1 The first Lyα spectra of active galactic nuclei

Even before IUE, some extragalactic objects were observed with sounding rocket experiments, which were able to launch small UV telescopes above enough of the atmosphere to observe in the UV. Davidsen, Hartig, & Fastie (Reference Davidsen, Hartig and Fastie1977) targeted the first known quasar, 3C 273, with a UV spectro-photometer onboard a sounding rocket and provided the first measurement of Lyα and Balmer emission lines from any astrophysical body. Combining the measured Lyα flux with optical measurements revealed a Lyα/Hβ ratio of 4, a measurement that then sat in stark contrast to the value of ≈ 40 that was expected for nebular recombinations and a Lyα enhancement from collisions. In 1977, Davidsen et al. discussed the order-of-magnitude Lyα deficit with the following statement:

“The most obvious explanation, that the ultraviolet lines are attenuated by absorption by dust similar to that observed in the interstellar medium, seems untenable in view of observations of Paschen α that indicate the hydrogen lines are unreddened. But, dust which is distributed within the line-emitting gas might destroy Lα without having much effect on the Balmer and Paschen lines if the nebula has high optical depth to Lα photons.

[...]

Whatever mechanism is at work, an understanding of the reduced Lyα/Hβ ratio may lead to a vastly improved knowledge of the physical conditions in QSO envelopes.”

While this review is not focused upon QSOs, replacing ‘QSO’ with ‘galaxy’ in this statement comes precisely to the point. Today Lyα observations play a major role in understanding the interstellar and circumgalactic media of galaxies at effectively all redshifts.

The 1978 launch of IUE opened up the rest-frame UV to systematic study. IUE had a single 20 arcsec × 10 arcsec entrance aperture and Short and Long-Wavelength Prime channels (SWP and LWP, respectively) that could provide R ≈ 250 spectroscopy between 1150 and 3000 Å. First observations were again turned to QSOs and various Seyfert galaxies, and immediately showed Lyα to be weaker than expected for recombination theory, with Lyα/Hβ and Hα/Hβ values almost never falling along characteristic reddening curves, and Lyα always being preferentially suppressed (Oke & Zimmerman Reference Oke and Zimmerman1979; Wu, Boggess, & Gull Reference Wu, Boggess and Gull1980; Lacy et al. Reference Lacy1982). Interpretations varied, with suggestions that multiple scatterings of Lyα could be responsible, that broad-line regions experience a wide variation in their extinction laws, ionisation/excitation from already-excited states, and that there may be no representative intrinsic spectral shape for Seyfert galaxies (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Boggess and Gull1980). Indeed, Lacy et al. (Reference Lacy1982) concluded that the low observed Lyα fluxes were likely the result of a combination of reddening, high densities, and high Hi optical depth. All these effects conspire in the same direction but as no single dominant quantities could be identified, it started to become clear that Lyα transfer in true astrophysical objects is a complicated multi-parametric process.

3.2 Star-forming galaxies

When IUE was first turned to star-forming galaxies, the results directly mirrored those obtained in both nearby QSOs and also those being reported from high-z blind narrow-band and spectroscopic surveys (see Pritchet Reference Pritchet1994, for a review, and the forthcoming PASA review in this series by S. Malhotra): Lyα was either absent or unexpectedly weak in all galaxies.

With the intent of studying the analogues of primeval galaxies at high-z, Meier & Terlevich (Reference Meier and Terlevich1981) found Lyα in emission from just one of three nearby Hii-selected galaxies, and in that single case with a flux well below that expected for the nebular dust content (Figure 1). This led them to conclude that under normal conditions, Lyα emission would be a rare phenomenon. It was determined that if a normal prescription for dust attenuation were used to explain the Lyα/Hβ ratio, this would greatly over-predict the Hα/Hβ ratio compared to observation. Similar conclusions were reached by Hartmann, Huchra, & Geller (Reference Hartmann, Huchra and Geller1984), who furthered the discussion, showing how a mixed medium of Hi and dust could preferentially suppress Lyα, and that static Hi columns of density above 1019 cm−2 would be needed to reconcile the line ratios. Further, they raised the issue that, where Hi 21-cm data are available, most blue compact galaxies (BCGs) are found to sit inside extended Hi halos of sufficient column density to reproduce the measured fluxes. All signs pointed towards the fact Lyα emission would not be the good observational beacon to identify primeval galaxies in the early universe that Partridge & Peebles (Reference Partridge and Peebles1967) had predicted.

Figure 1. The first Lyα spectra of Hii galaxies. Main transitions and cosmic ray hits are labelled. The upper panel shows Mrk 701 (C 0842+163), with a redshift of z = 0.0522 and a metallicity of Z ≈ 0.4 Z . At the wavelength of λ = 1278 Å, the galaxy shows only a Lyα absorption feature. The lower panel shows a very different object – C 1543+0907, with a redshift of z = 0.0366 and metallicity of 1/10 the solar value. At the wavelength of λ = 1260 Å, the bright high-contrast Lyα emission line is obvious. Reproduced by permission of the AAS, from Meier & Terlevich (Reference Meier and Terlevich1981).

While the influence of Hi on Lyα visibility was starting to be seen empirically, some correlation with the dust abundance should still be expected, albeit with a large spread. After subsequent data acquisition, the anticorrelation between Lyα EW and gas-phase metallicity (Z) was discovered (Hartmann et al. Reference Hartmann, Huchra, Geller, O’Brien and Wilson1988; Calzetti & Kinney Reference Calzetti and Kinney1992; Terlevich et al. Reference Terlevich, Diaz, Terlevich and Vargas1993; Charlot & Fall Reference Charlot and Fall1993), seemingly confirming the prediction. However the spread on the relation was particularly large, and it was clear that something beyond variations in the extinction law (e.g. Valls-Gabaud Reference Valls-Gabaud1993) were behind the wide range of line ratios, with ISM geometry and holes being the most often-cited scenarios.

Giavalisco, Koratkar, & Calzetti (Reference Giavalisco, Koratkar and Calzetti1996) performed a full reanalysis of the IUE archival data, resulting in several changes. First, the IUE data reduction software reached a higher level of maturity, and new spectral extraction and cosmic-ray removal tools were implemented: this reduced the measured W Lyα significantly in about half the sample, and completely removed the weak Lyα feature that had been reported in some galaxies. Secondly, these authors performed proper spatial matching between the IUE and apertures used for optical line spectroscopy. When the homogenised reanalysis was complete, both the W Lyα and Lyα/Balmer line ratios showed no significant correlation with nebular dust attenuation or the UV continuum colour (β), and only a weak but significant correlation with nebular oxygen abundance. Results concerning the Lyα/Hα line ratios can be seen Figure 2.

Figure 2. The observed ratio of Lyα/Hα fluxes, shown on a linear scale against nebular metallicity and the Hα/Hβ line ratio for the full sample of star-forming galaxies observed with the IUE, and reprocessed by Giavalisco et al. (Reference Giavalisco, Koratkar and Calzetti1996). Negative Lyα/Hα ratios are the result of the Lyα feature being dominated by ISM absorption. The reference coding is MT81=Meier & Terlevich (Reference Meier and Terlevich1981), H84=Hartmann et al. (Reference Hartmann, Huchra and Geller1984), H88=Hartmann et al. (Reference Hartmann, Huchra, Geller, O’Brien and Wilson1988), C94=Calzetti, Kinney, & Storchi-Bergmann (Reference Calzetti, Kinney and Storchi-Bergmann1994), CK92=Calzetti & Kinney (Reference Calzetti and Kinney1992), D86=Deharveng, Joubert, & Kunth (Reference Deharveng, Joubert, Kunth, Kunth, Thuan, Thanh Van, Lequeux and Audouze (SAO/NASA ADS)1986), T93=Terlevich et al. (Reference Terlevich, Diaz, Terlevich and Vargas1993). The dotted black line shows the effect of the Calzetti et al. (Reference Calzetti, Armus, Bohlin, Kinney, Koornneef and Storchi-Bergmann2000) dust attenuation curve, assuming intrinsic ratios of Lyα/Hα=8.7 and Hα/Hβ=2.86 and no scattering. Most of the galaxies lie far below this curve.

Regarding these correlations, it is not clear why Lyα throughput should be more strongly correlated with oxygen abundance than nebular attenuation. Metals alone do not absorb Lyα, which can only happen by interaction with dust grains. Thus, if the W LyαZ anti-correlation results from a positive correlation between metal and dust abundance, then a tighter correlation between Lyα/Hα and E BV would be expected. This correlation is completely absent. Furthermore, when the dust reddening measured from the Balmer decrement is used to correct the observed Lyα for extinction, the Lyα flux does not reach the expected case B recombination value in a single galaxy in the IUE sample. This demonstrates that either some preferential attenuation of Lyα must be at play in every galaxy, or/and that dust attenuation laws, when applied as a screen of absorbing material, are not representative.

When interpreting these analyses of the IUE samples, it is important to keep in mind the selection functions by which the individual samples were established. When effective telescope areas are small and exposure times need to be long, the result is small samples. Some of the blue compact dwarf (BCD) and Hii galaxy studies were designed to study the analogues to ‘primeval’ galaxies that are undergoing their first phase of star formation, and the samples did not include galaxies with strong star-bursting nuclei (Hartmann et al. Reference Hartmann, Huchra and Geller1984). Yet the primeval stages of galaxy formation, prior to the initial dust and metal production, are expected to be short-lived because the first generations of supernovae will enrich the local ISM on timescales of just a few Myr. Consequently, the bulk of the galaxy population we can observe in the high-redshift universe is likely to be significantly more metal-enriched than that of primeval galaxies (e.g. Pettini et al. Reference Pettini, Rix, Steidel, Adelberger, Hunt and Shapley2002; Shapley et al. Reference Shapley, Steidel, Pettini and Adelberger2003), unless observations catch galaxies in very narrow time window. Thus while providing very interesting astrophysical laboratories, the samples are biased and not necessarily in a direction tuned to the real importance of Lyα: probing the faint population of normal galaxies at z > 2. The IUE samples contain few galaxies that can be considered the local analogues of high-z Lyman Break Galaxies (LBG), LAEs, or primeval galaxy building blocks.

4 HIGH-RESOLUTION SPECTROSCOPY WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE

High-resolution UV observations in the nearby universe, both imaging and spectroscopy, are one of the major legacies of HST. The main UV spectrographs on HST were designed to have high resolving powers, which necessitated either small entrance apertures or the use of narrow slits. The natural consequence is that while HST spectra may be rich with features, any measurements strictly reflect the properties of the stars and gas that fall within the aperture. In most cases, these will be the regions of highest UV surface brightness, which in general will be unobscured massive stellar clusters. However, it is not necessary that these local properties, whether regarding Lyα or interstellar gas, are representative of the entire galaxy. Thus, we must always keep in mind that HST-derived measurements of gas kinematics, densities, and covering, such as those discussed in this section, are local.

The first-generation instrument, the Goddard High Resolution Spectrograph (GHRS) increased the resolving power over that of the IUE (R ~ 250) by a factor of 10–100. This enabled studies of the kinematics and covering of the atomic gas, which are topics completely absent from discussion in every previous paper presenting IUE data. Furthermore, with the IUE observers needed to target galaxies at high enough radial velocity to separate the intrinsic Lyα feature from the bright Lyα line produced in the Earth’s corona, which is brighter than any known extragalactic object. Indeed, because of the tentative anticorrelation between W Lyα and metallicity, Meier & Terlevich (Reference Meier and Terlevich1981) already commented upon how it was unfortunate that the lowest metallicity galaxy known – i Zw 18, with 12 + log(O/H) ≈ 7.2 – had too small a redshift to be observed with IUE, for logically it must be very bright in Lyα. With HST/GHRS, it could finally be observed.

4.1 HST finds deep Lyα absorption

GHRS observations of i Zw 18 revealed a profile showing only damped Lyα absorption and no hint of emission (Kunth et al. Reference Kunth, Lequeux, Sargent and Viallefond1994). The Lorentzian wings of the absorption profile can be traced out to at least 6000 km s−1 (Figure 3; Mas-Hesse et al. Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003), implying a Hi column density above several 1021 cm−2. Furthermore, measurements of the low ionisation stage (LIS) metal lines that form in the neutral ISM (e.g. Oi λ1302, Siii λ1304) show that the Hi gas is static with respect to the Hii regions, and at the measured column density Lyα radiation at line-centre will have to traverse 107 optical depths in order to escape if the Hi is homogeneous.

Figure 3. The Lyα spectra of first dwarf galaxies to be observed in the far UV with HST. The left panel shows i Zw 18, first observed with GHRS by Kunth et al. (Reference Kunth, Lequeux, Sargent and Viallefond1994). The geocoronal Lyα line has been masked out and is shown by a line set to zero flux at velocities of −500 to −2000 km s−1. No intrinsic Lyα emission is seen, and damping wings are visible that extend to at least 6 000 km s−1. Figure is taken from Mas-Hesse et al. (Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003). The right panel shows Haro 2, first observed by Lequeux et al. (Reference Lequeux, Kunth, Mas-Hesse and Sargent1995). Haro 2 has a much higher dust abundance than i Zw 18, but shows a strong Lyα emission line. Furthermore, the line profile is P Cygni-like, which indicates the intrinsically produced frequencies have been redistributed by scattering in an expanding neutral medium. Data are replotted from Mas-Hesse et al. (Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003).

Subsequent observations of i Zw 18 with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) enabled detailed, spatially resolved, and empirically well-constrained studies of Lyα radiative transport, which indeed shows that this profile can be reproduced, including spatial variation in the damping wings, using column densities of N HI ~ 3 × 1021 cm−2, and E BV= 0.05 (Atek, Schaerer, & Kunth Reference Atek, Schaerer and Kunth2009). This is fully consistent with the directly observed values on both N Hi and E BV. Moreover, the same transport simulations predict that for static gas with this Hi column density, almost all the Lyα radiation is absorbed by the small amount of available dust (escape fraction the order of 10−4 to 10−3), as many scattering events increase the probability of absorption.

With the HST servicing mission 4, the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) was installed on HST. COS has a similarly sized entrance window to GHRS and similar grating specifications, but can observe much larger wavelength range in a single observation, and is many times more sensitive. Recently obtained COS observations of i Zw 18 enable us to go much deeper than was previously possible, and a COS/G130M exposure of 29 ks actually does reveal a small bump of Lyα emission, hidden at the bottom of the absorption profile (Figure 4; see also Lebouteiller et al. Reference Lebouteiller, Heap, Hubeny and Kunth2013; James et al. Reference James, Aloisi, Heckman, Sohn and Wolfe2014). The Lyα emission feature lies in the centre of the absorption trough, and the flux amounts to just ≈ 4 × 10−16 erg s−1 cm−2. Recalling at this point that HST spectrographs measure only very local properties, we would need to make a large aperture correction to estimate the total Lyα output. If we assume an exponential Lyα surface brightness profile we would need a scale length of 80 arcsec in order for 100% of the Lyα to be emitted (integrating to infinity). While this is not ruled out – Hi is extends over at least a square arcmin (van Zee et al. Reference van Zee, Westpfahl, Haynes and Salzer1998) – this scale length is 40 times the UV effective radius, which is an extreme extension of Lyα compared with other nearby objects (Section 5). The alternative is that a large fraction of the Lyα photons are absorbed by dust after numerous scattering events, as suggested by Atek, Schaerer, & Kunth (Reference Atek, Schaerer and Kunth2009).

Figure 4. Very deep Lyα spectrum i Zw 18 obtained with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph. While previously referred to as a Lyα absorbing galaxy, i Zw 18 shows a very small but significant bump of Lyα emission. This bump is redshifted from the expected systemic velocity (the dot–dashed vertical line) derived from the Hα line. The overlaid red line shows the profile of Lyα transferring through a static shell of atomic hydrogen with a column density of log(N HI/cm−2) = 21.1, taken from the Schaerer et al. (Reference Schaerer, Hayes, Verhamme and Teyssier2011) grid of transfer models. The strong emission feature is the geocoronal Lyα emission line. The inset shows the wider spectral profile.

In i Zw 18, the Lyα bump is also offset from the systemic velocity (measured from Hα) by 350 km s−1 while the neutral gas shows bulk velocities of −10 km s−1 (measured from Siii). The bulk motion is insufficient by an order of magnitude to kinematically redshift the Lyα by such a velocity, so other physical processes must be at play. The red line in Figure 4 shows a radiative transport model produced by the grid of Schaerer et al. (Reference Schaerer, Hayes, Verhamme and Teyssier2011), for a completely static and dust-free Hi shell with a column density log(N HI/cm−2) = 21.1, which is within 0.25 dex of previous estimates based upon modelling just the absorption feature. A plausible interpretation is that the bump is the red half of a double-peaked profile, which results from wing scattering events that shift photons in frequency many Doppler widths into the redistribution profile. If so, and the scattering medium is completely static, there would be a corresponding blue peak at –350 km s−1; this however would be hidden below the geocoronal Lyα line, that swamps any intrinsic emission.

Observations of similar dwarf galaxies show the deep Lyα absorption seen in i Zw 18 is not unique. Two of the other most metal-deficient galaxies known, SBS 0335–052 and Tol 65 (Thuan & Izotov Reference Thuan and Izotov1997), have metallicities just a factor of 2 higher than i Zw 18. Both also show broad Lyα absorption profiles with EWs of −20 to −30 Å, no hints of Lyα emission, and clear damping wings that imply Hi column densities above 2 × 1021 cm−2. Similar deep absorption is visible in the COS spectrum of low-metallicity dwarf SBS 1415+437 (James et al. Reference James, Aloisi, Heckman, Sohn and Wolfe2014; 12 + log(O/H) ≈ 7.6), which also shows a similarly redshifted bump of Lyα in emission. These galaxies are very rare in the local universe, and one may question whether far-reaching conclusions may be drawn from them. Nevertheless, such objects may become more abundant at higher redshifts, and any complete theoretical picture of Lyα must also include them.

4.2 Galaxy winds and atomic gas kinematics

In contrast to the strongly absorbing dwarfs, the second BCG with a published HST Lyα spectrum, Haro 2, was found to emit a strong Lyα line with W Lyα ≈ 7 Å (emission part only, Lequeux et al. Reference Lequeux, Kunth, Mas-Hesse and Sargent1995, right panel of Figure 3). This is particularly curious because Haro 2 is an order of magnitude more dust- and metal-rich than i Zw 18. Comparing with the absorbing BCDs discussed in Section 4.1, the total column density of hydrogen along the line-of-sight is roughly the same, but with two important differences. First, much less of that hydrogen column density is contributed by the neutral phase, although the measured column of N Hi ≳ 1020 cm−2 would still be sufficient to cause damped absorption. Secondly, the absorption centroid of Lyα is blueshifted by ≈ 200 km s−1 relative to the systemic frame of rest of the galaxy. The result of this first resolved observation of a Lyα emission line is an asymmetric profile that comprises a blue absorption component and a red emission peak, similar to the P Cygni profile. Even though the wing of the absorption profile is quite extended, the velocity offset is sufficient to shift the neutral medium partially out of resonance with Lyα, and enable some of the Lyα radiation to escape.

The LIS lines intrinsic to Haro 2 were also found to be blueshifted with respect to the systemic velocity, and by the same velocity as measured from the Lyα absorption (≈ 200 km s−1). The peak of the Lyα emission, however, is instead redshifted by 350 km s−1, or roughly twice the blueshift of the neutral medium. This led Lequeux et al. (Reference Lequeux, Kunth, Mas-Hesse and Sargent1995) to suggest that much of the Lyα is able to avoid Hi absorption in Haro 2 because it does not see the atomic gas as static, and the redshifted Lyα emission supports a picture in which the Lyα that is emitted is ‘backscattered’ from a receding shell of Hi gas (Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Schaerer, Atek and Tapken2008). Furthermore in Haro 2, diffuse soft X-ray emission covers and extends beyond the UV-bright, star-forming regions, which is produced by the mechanical energy released by the star formation episode (Otí-Floranes et al. Reference Otí-Floranes, Mas-Hesse, Jiménez-Bailón, Schaerer, Hayes, Östlin, Atek and Kunth2012). This X-ray emission is spatially consistent with an extension of the Lyα emission in the 2D spectral image. In contrast, i Zw 18, which shows only Lyα absorption and static low-ionisation absorption lines, is undetected at soft X-ray energies (Ott, Walter, & Brinks Reference Ott, Walter and Brinks2005). The conventional picture for galaxy outflows is that cold gas is accelerated by expanding hotter gas (e.g. Strickland et al. Reference Strickland, Heckman, Colbert, Hoopes and Weaver2004), which supports scenario where feedback-driven outflows promote the emission of Lyα.

This early picture easily generalised in a sample of eight local BCGs observed by Kunth et al. (Reference Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Terlevich, Terlevich, Lequeux and Fall1998), four of which show net Lyα in emission and four in absorption. For those with net absorption, their Oi λ1302 and Siii λ1304 absorption lines lie close to the systemic velocity (within 25 km s−1), while the other four show outflowing gas with centroid velocities shifted by 60–180 km s−1 (see also Leitherer et al. Reference Leitherer, Chandar, Tremonti, Wofford and Schaerer2013). This correlation does not necessarily imply a causal relationship and the fact that Lyα is seen to be locally emitted where outflows are strong could also be explained also by orientation: transport models show more Lyα to be emitted perpendicular to galaxy disks purely because of the Hi distribution (Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Dubois, Blaizot, Garel, Bacon, Devriendt, Guiderdoni and Slyz2012; Laursen, Duval, & Östlin Reference Laursen, Duval and Östlin2013), and winds are also stronger in the polar direction because the pressure is also lower (e.g. Bland & Tully Reference Bland and Tully1988; Veilleux & Rupke Reference Veilleux and Rupke2002). More compelling evidence for a causal association comes from the fact that all the Lyα emission lines in the sample show P Cygni-like asymmetric profiles, indicating that photons are interacting directly in the outflowing medium. For this, it is much harder to argue for a non-causal relation.

Galaxies in the Kunth et al. (Reference Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Terlevich, Terlevich, Lequeux and Fall1998) sample were originally chosen to span a range of metallicities and dust contents, but both of these quantities were found to be secondary in governing Lyα emission/absorption when compared to the presence/absence of outflowing neutral gas.

COS Lyα observations of local galaxies are ongoing, but already the instrument has far outdone the GHRS in terms of numbers. Using larger samples of both FUV-selected (Heckman et al. Reference Heckman2011) and Hα-selected objects (Wofford, Leitherer, & Salzer Reference Wofford, Leitherer and Salzer2013), this picture of kinematic regulation easily has strengthened. For galaxies in the ‘Lyman-break analogue’ (LBA) samples of Heckman et al. (Reference Heckman2011), P Cygni emission is ubiquitous while for the Hα-galaxies, redshifted Lyα peaks and LIS lines blueshifted by around 100 km s−1 are found among the emitters, while absorption lines (including Lyα) consistent with zero velocity shift at 68% confidence are exhibited by the absorbers.

Similar results are found among the Lyman alpha Reference Sample (LARS; Section 5.2; Rivera-Thorsen et al. Reference Rivera-Thorsen2015), which are summarised in the lower panels of Figure 5. The left-most panel shows an example where the ISM in front of the brightest nuclear star cluster (where the COS aperture is positioned) is static, and from where broad damped Lyα absorption is also observed. From other regions of the galaxy, however, Lyα emission is recovered and the galaxy becomes a weak LAE (W Lyα ≈ 10 Å) in apertures that encompass the galaxy. The central panel shows an example where the neutral ISM is outflowing along the line-of-sight by around 250 km s−1, the Hi absorption is similarly blueshifted, and a weak Lyα emission feature is visible within the pointing of the COS. The right panel instead shows a galaxy where the atomic gas is outflowing at higher velocity still, and a very bright Lyα emission line is visible with W Lyα ≈ 40 Å (80 Å when including extended emission).

Figure 5. Example images and Lyα spectra of local galaxies. Upper panels show colour composite images, encoding Hα in red, FUV continuum in green, and Lyα in blue. Dotted white lines indicate the size and position of the COS aperture. Lower panels show the corresponding spectra around Lyα (dark blue) and Siiiλ1260 Å (red). Objects are selected to illustrate the variety of Lyα and LIS profiles. Note the different velocity scales, which extend to ± 7000 km s−1 in the left-most frame but just ± 1500 km s−1 in the other two. The left object, LARS 09, shows a completely absorbed Siii profile that is centred at zero velocity. This absorbing gas removes 300 km s−1 (Full Width at Half Maximum [FWHM]) in the Siii line but completely damps the Lyα line, resulting in a FWHM that is 20 times broader. The centre plot, LARS 08, shows a similarly broad and saturated Siii profile, but one that is offset in velocity by ~ −250 km s−1. The blue wing of the Lyα absorption profile shows a similar shape and is offset in a similar way to the left panel, but in this case a redshifted Lyα line is emitted. The right panel shows an example of a strong Lyα-emitter, in which the Siii absorption is blueshifted by ≈ 350 km s−1, is far from saturated, and a very bright Lyα emission line is seen.

Obviously, if all neutral gas can be cleared from zero velocity, then Lyα should escape unhindered. For the column densities probed using the Siii lines, this appears to be the case in the right panel of Figure 5, where only more tenuous gas appears to remain at Δv ≈ 0 to absorb Lyα. Yet removal of cold gas from Δv ≈ 0 not a requirement for Lyα emission, and Rivera-Thorsen et al. (Reference Rivera-Thorsen2015) present several examples of galaxies that show strong Siii absorption at Δv = 0, but also significant Lyα emission (their Figure 8). However, while there is clearly gas that does not have a velocity shift, the centroids of the absorption profiles are offset – usually by ≲ −50 km s−1 – which demonstrates that there is fast-moving gas that can Doppler shift Lyα out of resonance with the static material. Additional support for this comes from the fact that the peak of the Lyα profile is redshifted in every case.

Figure 6 summarises the situation, by showing the average velocity shift of low-ionisation absorption lines compared with W Lyα measured in the same aperture (diameter of 1.9 and 2.5 arcsec with GHRS and COS, respectively). Outflow velocities span a range from −250 to + 50 km s−1 (net inflow), with a median value of −50 km s−1. No galaxy with low-ionisation gas moving in the velocity range −50 to + 50 km s−1 shows significant Lyα emission: all but two of these objects show either net absorption or emit Lyα with a total EW below 3 Å. However, galaxies with faster outflowing gas show a wide range of W Lyα, which reaches up to 40 Å, with an average near 10 Å. We can state with confidence that at least on small scales Lyα emission is correlated with feedback of sufficient magnitude, that acts to accelerate the highest density neutral ISM along the line of sight. Note, however, that this does not mean it is the case that all galaxies with a strong outflow are LAEs – clearly there are galaxies with Δv ≈ −150 km s−1 and W Lyα below 2 Å. Furthermore, while the correlation exists, the causal mechanism by which feedback affects the transport has not necessarily been established. For example, whether feedback is simply shifting the Lyα out of resonance by scattering from bulk-flowing gas, or the instigation of fluid instabilities that disrupt the ISM.

Figure 6. The relationship between W Lyα and outflow velocity of the atomic gas. All measurements are made within spectroscopic apertures with HST/GHRS and COS. Where the Lyα absorption component dominates over emission, W Lyα is set to zero. Δv is calculated from the average of velocity centroids of all observed LIS lines compared with the intrinsic velocity of the nebulae measured from optical emission lines. A cut of Δv = −50 km s−1 divides the sample in half by Δv, segregating galaxies with fast outflows from those with weakly outflowing, static, or inflowing neutral media. Grey points with errorbars represent the average and standard deviation of galaxies of these two sub-samples.

4.3 Dissecting the neutral medium in detail

In addition to gas kinematics, the plethora of resonance absorption lines in the UV also provide a proxy for the fractional covering of the cold Hi medium (e.g. Savage & Sembach Reference Savage and Sembach1996; Pettini et al. Reference Pettini, Rix, Steidel, Adelberger, Hunt and Shapley2002). The principle is simple: strong resonance transitions are assumed to be saturated at normal metallicities and column densities, and thus if the absorbing line does not drop to the level of zero intensity then the observation hints that there may be multiple clouds inside the spectroscopic aperture that do not fully cover the stellar sources of continuum radiation that lie beneath. Thus if there are direct sightlines between the observer and the ionised regions, Lyα may escape unimpeded, and importantly, without frequency shift. Indeed, if scattering could be completely mitigated and dust confined to the cold gas phase, f Lyαesc should be at least 1 −f c, where f c is the Hi covering fraction.

These methods have been used to place indirect limits on the escape of ionising radiation from starburst galaxies (Grimes et al. Reference Grimes2009; Heckman et al. Reference Heckman2011), and have recently been verified by direct observations in the ionising continuum with HST/COS (Borthakur et al. Reference Borthakur, Heckman, Leitherer and Overzier2014). Similar tests, verified against Lyα emission, have been conducted at high-z (e.g. Jones et al. Reference Jones, Ellis, Schenker and Stark2013) and low-z COS studies focussed on Lyα recently been presented. For the majority of local UV-selected galaxies, the depth of the normally saturated Siii lines indicates a covering fraction close to unity. However, there is some deviation from this: a weak trend is seen for galaxies with f Lyαesc above 0.1 to be drawn from systems with Siiiλ1260 Å absorption lines that are not saturated (Rivera-Thorsen et al. Reference Rivera-Thorsen2015). Very well exposed continuum observations are needed to solve for covering fraction, but solutions include the possibility of f c < 1 for the thickest neutral gas columns in Lyα-emitting galaxies but not in the case of absorbing systems.

Many of the resonant UV transitions, including the Siii discussed above, have an associated fluorescent transition at longer wavelength, denoted with a * (e.g. Cii*), that provide additional diagnostics of the atomic medium (Prochaska, Kasen, & Rubin Reference Prochaska, Kasen and Rubin2011; Rubin et al. Reference Rubin, Prochaska, Ménard, Murray, Kasen, Koo and Phillips2011; Jaskot & Oey Reference Jaskot and Oey2014; Scarlata & Panagia Reference Scarlata and Panagia2015). Since the absorption lines are resonant, they may be partially filled by scattered radiation, similarly to Lyα. However, the fluorescent transition associated with each line has a roughly similar Einstein A coefficient to the resonant de-excitation, which implies that roughly half of absorbed photons should be emitted in the longer wavelength * line at every absorption event. In a symmetric, energy-conserving system without losses, absorption along the sightline must be balanced by isotropic fluorescent emission.

Jaskot & Oey (Reference Jaskot and Oey2014) recently presented spectra of two particularly interesting bright LAEs, with W Lyα between 70 and 150 Å. Both of these objects are well detected in the stellar continuum, but absorption lines of Cii λ1334 and Siii λ1260 Å lines are barely visible. However, the fluorescent counterpart of each transition is clearly seen in emission, suggesting that the ISM is indeed partly covered or shows a low Hi column density in these galaxies. A similar spectrum is that of LARS 14, illustrated in the lower-right panel of 5 (Rivera-Thorsen et al. Reference Rivera-Thorsen2015), which shows a bright Lyα line with a blue peak, incomplete Siii absorption, and a fluorescent emission line (seen at relative velocity of +1 200 km s−1).

Further information may be inferred from the profiles of Lyα. While Lyα and Siii λ1260 have cross sections of the same order of magnitude and become optically think at similar column density, the metal abundances imply that Lyα may be absorbed by gas that is not visible to metal absorption. Particularly, in the galaxies of Jaskot & Oey (Reference Jaskot and Oey2014) and LARS 14, the Lyα lines do not resemble the strongly asymmetric absorption+emission of P Cygni profiles that occur at high column densities of completely covered gas. Instead, they show double-peaked profiles with narrow absorption at Δv = 0. This indicates that there must be absorbing Hi that is not Doppler shifted, but that is also not of sufficient column density and/or metallicity to be seen in metal absorption lines. This implies N Hi between 1015 and 1018 cm−2 for normal ranges of metal abundance.

5 FROM SMALL TO LARGE SCALES: COMPLETING THE QUANTITATIVE PICTURE WITH HST IMAGING

HST spectroscopic studies are performed in small apertures or narrow slits. Even for the most distant objects discussed so far, the 2.5-arcsec entrance window of COS corresponds to a physical size of just 6 kpc, and obviously the apertures will sample much smaller scales in more nearby galaxies (e.g. just 130 pc in i Zw 18). Thus while providing a very rich picture about Lyα and the ISM, spectroscopic measurements are restricted to the chosen sightlines: as shown in Figure 5, these will sample only a fraction of the galaxies. These small apertures are necessary to get the high spectral resolution, but to capture a representative fraction of the Lyα they are likely far too small, particularly when considering that Lyα can scatter. To measure this flux, spectroscopic observations must be complimented with large-aperture imaging.

Thick columns of neutral gas have been observed in most of the starbursts mentioned so far, and spectroscopic data strongly suggest that scattering removes Lyα from the line-of-sight. An important question becomes whether the bulk of the absorbed Lyα is truly absorbed, or simply scattered to larger radii from where it is subsequently emitted. Such information is vital for the comparison with high-z data, where ordinarily a flux and EW measurement may be available but little more, and standard practice is to adopt small apertures that are appropriate for point sources (~1–2 arcsec).

Lyα imaging at z = 0 became efficient with HST when the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) was installed. Although it was technically possible with earlier cameras, the Solar Blind Channel of ACS has a peak throughput of a few percent, and made such observations feasible for the first time. Not only did this bring about the first resolved information on Lyα (aside from very extended high-z Lyα-blobs), but also an immediate leap to an angular resolution of ≈ 0.1 arcsec. However, galaxies still need to be sufficiently redshifted in order for Lyα not to be absorbed by Milky Way Hi (cz ≳ 2500 km s−1 is sufficient) so obvious targets such as very well-studied nearby systems such as M82 or M33 still cannot be observed.

The first Lyα images revealed a range of morphologies. Near the central starbursts, Lyα is seen in both emission and absorption, where it may vary between the two on sub-kpc scales with little obvious dependence upon local properties such as age or reddening. For example, the first starburst with a photometrically calibrated Lyα image, ESO 338–IG04 (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Leitherer and Petrosian2005), shows a lane of Lyα absorption that runs approximately E–W, and loops around one side of the galaxy only. This is seen at no other wavelength. In other regions, jets of brighter Lyα fuzz are visible, again seeming uncorrelated with obvious signs of Lyα production such as Hα emission. Obviously, spectroscopic results will be a strong function of aperture placement. Furthermore, as soon as ACS was turned towards local starbursts, Lyα halos were discovered to surround the starbursting regions (Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Hayes, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2008; Östlin et al. Reference Östlin, Hayes, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Petrosian and Atek2009). I now proceed to discuss the results of small-scale resolved analyses and extended Lyα halos, beginning with a case study of one system.

5.1 Resolved analyses: A case study of Haro 11

Local luminous BCG Haro 11 is an LBA (e.g. Grimes et al. Reference Grimes2007), and emits Lyα with a total EW of 15 Å. As shown in Figure 7, it comprises three main star-forming knots (labelled in the FUV image), all of which are bright in the UV and Hα, but only one of these condensations emits Lyα (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Atek, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Jiménez-Bailón and Adamo2007). Following this breakdown of the galaxy, knots A and B (the west-most two) are by far the brightest in Hα and must produce the bulk of the Lyα radiation, but both absorb Lyα. In contrast, it is only the single easterly knot C, which is the faintest of the three in Hα but brightest in the UV, that locally emits its Lyα. Haro 11 also emits a halo of Lyα emission, centred around knot C, which can most easily be explained if Lyα is re-radiated after scattering in the surrounding neutral gas. Diffuse emission also surrounds the two easterly knots, but at the positions of the clusters absorption outweighs the emission, giving a negative overall flux. While the Lyα surface brightness of the halo is low, it is also very much larger than the UV continuum-bright regions, and in total contributes ≈ 90% of the total Lyα flux (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Atek, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Jiménez-Bailón and Adamo2007). Results inferred from small-aperture spectroscopic observations will be a strong function of both the size and placement of the aperture.

Figure 7. HST/ACS imaging of luminous blue compact galaxy Haro 11 (Kunth et al. Reference Kunth, Leitherer, Mas-Hesse, Östlin and Petrosian2003; Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Atek, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Jiménez-Bailón and Adamo2007). Upper Left: far UV continuum; Upper Right: continuum-subtracted Hα; Lower Left: continuum-subtracted Lyα. The Lower Right panel shows a composite of the other three images, with Hα in red, FUV in green, and Lyα in blue. The physical scale in kpc is shown on the axes. In the FUV image, the three main star-forming condensations (knots A, B, and C) are labelled in the nomenclature of Vader et al. (Reference Vader, Frogel, Terndrup and Heisler1993); the Lyα-emitting clump with no detection at any other wavelength (Knot D in Kunth et al. Reference Kunth, Leitherer, Mas-Hesse, Östlin and Petrosian2003) is labelled in the Lyα image.

In Haro 11, Lyα produced in knots A and B may still be emitted, and all the observation can say is that more radiation from the stellar continuum is absorbed locally than the sum of directly emitted Lyα and any Lyα scattered into the line of sight. Thus for a given pixel, we still cannot say whether Lyα is scattered and absorbed by dust locally, or whether it propagates some kpc and contributes to the halo emission. Remarkably in this three-region decomposition of Haro 11, is that the strongly emitting knot C is also the dustiest, and shows E BV ≈ 0.4 magnitude, while knot A in particular is far less extinguished (Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Hayes, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2008). Under the simplistic assumption that dust plays a dominant role in regulating Lyα visibility, this would be unexpected, although results from these Lyα absorbing knots are reminiscent of the dwarf galaxies discussed in Section 4.

Similar phenomena were noted throughout the sample of nearby galaxies first observed with ACS. Specifically ESO 338–IG04 was also found to exhibit a diffuse Lyα halo that dominates the Lyα output (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Leitherer and Petrosian2005), and in a small sample of six local starbursts, global Lyα emission is invariably associated with large-scale halo emission (Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Hayes, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2008; Östlin et al. Reference Östlin, Hayes, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Petrosian and Atek2009).

Nebulae produce Lyα radiation intrinsically at an intensity of 8.7 times that of Hα (Section 2), but when we contrast the local surface brightnesses of the two lines a very wide range of line ratios is found. These are illustrated in Figure 8, which contrasts the Hα and Lyα surface brightness in Haro 11 pixel-by-pixel. We now discuss various regions of the diagram:

  1. (a) Lyα can be emitted with fluxes similar to those expected from recombination. In Figure 8 above log Lyα surface brightness of ≈ −12.8, a region of proportionality is seen between Lyα and Hα that falls right on top of the expectation value for Case B. These pixels correspond to knot C in Figure 7. Since this region of points is well defined and rather narrow, it can most easily be understood as Lyα photons leaving the galaxy with little interaction with surrounding Hi. Lyα photons emitted in these regions were most likely produced here.

  2. (b) Lyα can be emitted with fluxes below those expected from recombination. The preponderance of points in Figure 8 lie below the case B line. This can be the result of two factors: Lyα can be absorbed by dust, decreasing the Lyα/Hα ratio (just as the Balmer decrement increases with dust in nebulae), or Lyα can be scattered out of the line of sight by Hi, i.e. dust and Hi scattering act to move points down from the red line. Recall, also, that in this logarithmic plot Lyα absorption cannot be visualised and more pixels are to be found at negative values of Lyα.

  3. (c) Lyα can be emitted with fluxes above those expected from recombination. Toward the upper left region of the diagram, Lyα/Hα exceeds the value of 8.7 expected for Case B. In this example, some pixels are 10 times brighter in Lyα than expected. This happens only at lower Hα surface brightness, and here Lyα is spatially redistributed from elsewhere and emitted after scattering in the neutral ISM, resulting in the halo phenomenon discussed above and in the following section. Thus some of the Lyα that shows Lyα/Hα ≲ Case B (point b) must be scattered and not simply attenuated by dust.

Figure 8. Comparison of Lyα and Hα surface photometry for Haro 11. The abscissa shows the logarithmic Hα surface brightness, measured in individual pixels in the HST images, while the ordinate axis shows the corresponding surface brightness in Lyα, i.e. contours show the density of points when comparing pixel values in the frames from Figure 7. The red line shows the case B recombination line ratio of Lyα=8.7×Hα; intrinsically astrophysical nebulae produce Lyα and Hα radiation that follows this line. The plot is logarithmic, so only Lyα emitting regions can be visualised. Histograms above and to the right show the overall the distribution of light emitted as a function of surface brightness.

5.2 Extended halos

Early imaging observations showed that in galaxies with net Lyα emission, the dominant fraction comes from a component of large-scale extended emission that surrounds the star-forming regions. Indeed, upwards of 50% of the Lyα is typically emitted in halo regions that extended at least 10 kpc from the UV-bright clusters (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Leitherer and Petrosian2005; Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Hayes, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2008), and in some galaxies this is the only Lyα that emerges. The first large-scale Lyα imaging survey of local starbursts – LARS (Östlin et al. Reference Östlin2014) – has shown that extended halos are near ubiquitous in Lyα-emitting galaxies (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2013). Moreover, LARS has enabled the first systematic survey of the sizes of these halos and the comparison with other wavelengths.

Continuum-subtracted Lyα images show a wide range of morphologies. Typically, they do qualitatively resemble those of the UV and Hα, but are more extended, and envelop the galaxies. On average, halos have twice the linear size in Lyα that the galaxy does in either the UV stellar continuum or Hα (Figure 9, Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2013). These estimates are made using the depth- and redshift-independent Petrosian radii, which are found to be below 15 kpc in Lyα for LARS galaxies, with a median value of 5 kpc. Furthermore, the extension of the Lyα surface (ξLyα, the ratio of Lyα radius to Hα radius) is not an independent quantity, and is correlated with a number of measured properties: notably ξLyα is anti-correlated with dust abundance, as demonstrated by the lower panel of Figure 9, and Lyα extension is also found to be larger at lower metallicity and stellar mass. Radiative transfer simulations (using Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Dubois, Blaizot, Garel, Bacon, Devriendt, Guiderdoni and Slyz2012) show that this effect cannot be reproduced simply varying the dust content and what gives rise to these extended halos is currently unclear. Pardy et al. (Reference Pardy2014) have shown that higher ξLyα is produced by galaxies with narrower 21-cm line-widths, but not the total mass in Hi (which neglecting mergers correlates with the line-width), possibly indicating that lower mass galaxies with less complex large-scale morphologies are the ones in which Lyα scatters to the largest relative distances.

Figure 9. Extension of Lyα halos in the LARS sample; figure is taken from Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2013). The upper panel shows the Petrosian radius measured in Lyα plotted against that measured in Hα. The two galaxies that globally absorb Lyα are set to negative size. The dashed line shows the 1-to-1 line, and Lyα is on average twice the linear size of Hα. The lower panel shows the relative extension of Lyα compared to Hα, ξLyα. This example shows how the extension is anticorrelated with the UV continuum slope, β, which is commonly used as a proxy for the dust content in galaxies.

6 LYMAN ALPHA SURVEYS AT LOW REDSHIFT

A common criticism of some local Lyα studies is that the sample selection is different from that of LAEs and LBGs at z ≳ 2. The first generations of small HST studies were assembled largely from IUE atlas (Kinney et al. Reference Kinney, Bohlin, Calzetti, Panagia and Wyse1993), which in turn were selected from older objective prism or BCG surveys; in contrast, most high-z objects are selected by Lyman break techniques or Lyα detection in narrow-band filters. Several recent studies have begun to rectify this: first using HST, the LBA samples (Heckman et al. Reference Heckman2005; Hoopes et al. Reference Hoopes2007, based upon UV luminosity and compactness), LARS (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2013, Reference Hayes2014, based upon UV luminosity and Hα EW), and studies undertaken with the GALEX satellite (Deharveng et al. Reference Deharveng2008; Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010, based upon selection by Lyα emission).

The GALEX satellite has been a vital contributer to low-z Lyα astrophysics. As well as FUV and NUV imaging channels, GALEX also had the capability to perform slitless spectroscopy across the same FUV and NUV bandpasses, providing low-resolution spectroscopy of Lyα for objects at z ≈ 0.19 −0.45 and z ≈ 0.65 −1.25. In turn, this enables us to really survey the low-z universe for Lyα-emitting galaxies (Deharveng et al. Reference Deharveng2008; Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010), and redshifts around 1 (Barger, Cowie, & Wold Reference Barger, Cowie and Wold2012; Wold et al. Reference Wold, Barger and Cowie2014), in a manner very similar to those employed at high-z. In the FUV channels, GALEX LAE surveys capture objects with NUV apparent magnitudes down to 21.8 (AB); at z = 0.3 this corresponds to an SFR of 3.6 M yr−1, assuming the continuum is unobscured.

Figure 10 shows the Lyα luminosities probed by various studies out to z ~ 4. As shown by the cyan squares and red upward-facing triangles, UV-selected LARS galaxies and GALEX LAEs occupy a very similar range of Lyα luminosities. Contrasting these luminosities with some z > 2 surveys, significant overlap is seen with the deepest ground-based observations: surveys of Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2010), Cantalupo et al. (Reference Cantalupo, Lilly and Haehnelt2012, both narrow-band), and Rauch et al. (Reference Rauch2008, blind long-slit spectroscopy, without aperture correction) overlap the local HST and GALEX samples at above the 50% level.

Figure 10. The Lyα luminosities probed by various galaxy surveys. Reference coding: C10=Cowie, Barger, & Hu (Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011); W14=Wold, Barger, & Cowie (Reference Wold, Barger and Cowie2014); H14=Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2014); R08=Rauch et al. (Reference Rauch2008); G11=Guaita et al. (Reference Guaita2011); B11=Blanc et al. (Reference Blanc2011); C12=Cantalupo, Lilly, & Haehnelt (Reference Cantalupo, Lilly and Haehnelt2012); H10=Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2010). Narrow-band surveys (G11, C12, H10) have been artificially randomised by Δz = 0.05 to aid visibility.

The z ~ 1 LAEs discovered by GALEX, however, are an order of magnitude more luminous than the z < 0.4 sample, and show almost no overlap with the more local objects. This is entirely a matter of distance, where the same limiting flux corresponds to a factor of 20 difference in luminosity between z = 0.3 and 1. This difference may introduce some biases when comparing the luminosity distributions of the two GALEX samples, as we show in the coming section. These z ~ 1 LAEs, however, do span a similar luminosity range to some of the larger volume, shallower Lyα-surveys at z ≳ 3 (e.g. Blanc et al. Reference Blanc2011).

In the following sections, I discuss the most important results from the ⟨z⟩ = 0.3 and ~ 1 studies with GALEX, regarding the numbers/evolution of Lyα-emitting galaxies (Section 6.1), and statistical studies of their properties (Section 6.2); in part the properties of galaxies are part of that evolutionary process.

6.1 Evolution of Lyman alpha galaxies into the nearby universe

IUE demonstrated that Lyα emission is rare in the nearby universe but GALEX could determine how rare. The first Lyα luminosity functions (LFs) at z ≈ 0.3 showed that Lyα-emitting galaxies have become both fainter and less abundant than at high-z. Figure 11 shows the LFs measured at z ~ 0.3 and 1 (Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010; Wold et al. Reference Wold, Barger and Cowie2014, respectively), together with recent measurements for z = 2.1 (Ciardullo et al. Reference Ciardullo2012).

Figure 11. Left: The evolution of the Lyα luminosity functions with redshift. Turquoise line shows the z ≈ 0.3 LF of Cowie, Barger, & Hu (Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010) and purple shows the z ≈ 1 LF of Wold, Barger, & Cowie (Reference Wold, Barger and Cowie2014), measured by GALEX FUV and NUV, respectively. The dark red line shows the LF of Ciardullo et al. (Reference Ciardullo2012), measured at z = 2.1 using narrow-band filters. Significant evolution is seen between the distant universe and the local one; grey arrows show the suspected modes of evolution in both luminosity and density (see the text for details). The dotted line shows the Hα LF at z = 0.2 of Tresse & Maddox (Reference Tresse and Maddox1998). Right: the cumulative Lyα equivalent width distribution at the same redshifts; data are taken from the same surveys, with the z ≈ 2.1 distributions from Guaita et al. (Reference Guaita2010, Reference Guaita2011).

It should be noted that, while these LFs are the best that can be done with GALEX, the samples are not large: 119 at z ~ 0.3 and 141 at z ~ 1. However, because of GALEX’s wide field-of-view and the large continuous wavelength range provided by slitless spectroscopy, the cosmic volumes probed are in fact rather large, and covering several 106 comoving Mpc3. Thus while the individual parameters in the Schechter function may not be very tightly constrained, the small number of galaxies is certainly because of the relative paucity of LAEs at lower redshifts.

As discussed in Section 6, the two GALEX samples cover different luminosity ranges (Figure 10). Moreover, the dynamic range of the surveys is not large, and even for the less luminous z ≲ 0.4 sample it is not possible to calculate the faint-end-slope (α) of the LF. Thus the LFs presented in Figure 11 assume α, basing the assumption on measured values at z = 2–3 for the z ~ 1 sample, and the α for local Hα-emitters for the z ≲ 0.4 sample. Note also that the faint-end slope of the Lyα LF is also not very tightly constrained at high redshift (reasons outlined in Dressler et al. Reference Dressler, Henry, Martin, Sawicki, McCarthy and Villaneuva2015).

At z ≈ 0.3 and to the UV limits mentioned in Section 6, the shape of the Lyα LF closely resembles that of Hα and Hβ, although is lower in normalisation: Lyα-emitting galaxies make up about ≈ 15% of the local Hα-selected galaxy population (Deharveng et al. Reference Deharveng2008; Hu et al. Reference Hu, Cowie, Kakazu and Barger2009) and 1/20 the FUV counts at the same z (Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010). This equates to a volume-averaged escape fraction of below 1% (Hayes et al. Reference Hayes, Schaerer, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Atek and Kunth2011), although this f Lyαesc will be slightly higher when considering possible emission from galaxies not formally classed as LAEs (i.e. galaxies that emit weaker Lyα with 0 ⩽ W Lyα < 20 Å). At z ~ 2, the average f Lyαesc is ≈ 5%, so the average Lyα output of the whole cosmic volume decreases 5-fold. Note that this decrease in the emitted fraction of Lyα happens on top of the decrease in the cosmic SFR density, which also drops by a factor of 5–10 over the same change in redshift (Madau & Dickinson Reference Madau and Dickinson2014), implying the Lyα luminosity density of the local universe is far below that of z ≳ 2.

A large fraction of this evolution takes place in the 4.3 Gyr that elapses between redshifts of 1 and 0.3 (Wold et al. Reference Wold, Barger and Cowie2014). At the higher redshift of 1, luminous LAEs are certainly in place, with luminosities equivalent to L at z ≈ 2 −3, and the evolution between z ≈ 0.3 and 1 can be well described by a simple factor of 10 increase of L in the Schechter (Reference Schechter1976) function. Over this redshift range, the space density of LAEs does not appear to change but the galaxies simply scale up in luminosity. Between z = 1 and 2 (3 Gyr), ϕ increases by an order of magnitude to produce the LFs observed in ground-based surveys. Arrows in Figure 11 show how the evolution of the LF manifests as a drop in density, followed by a dimming. Between the peak in the cosmic SFRD at z ~ 2–3 and z = 1, the universe first acts to turn off a fraction of the LAEs, whereafter between z = 1 and the nearby universe the abundance is constant but the galaxies get fainter in line with the evolution in both the UV and Hα.

Interestingly, this evolution is not strongly reflected in the EW distribution of LAEs, which does not evolve as dramatically. The EW distribution of Guaita et al. (Reference Guaita2011) at z ≈ 2.1 agrees well with the distribution at z ~ 1 (shown in the right panel of Figure 11) despite the fact that the overall Lyα-emitting fraction has decreased by a factor near 5 (Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010 contrasted with Shapley et al. Reference Shapley, Steidel, Pettini and Adelberger2003). Thus whatever process is turning LAEs off, it does not affect the shape of the remaining EW distribution (i.e. galaxies with W Lyα ≳ 20 Å). Of course, the EW distribution of the overall population changes significantly, as many galaxies drop below the canonical 20 Å limit; the higher EW tail of the distribution remains largely constant. Note that it is not necessarily fair to conclude strong evolution in the EW distribution to z ~ 0.3 from Figure 11, as the GALEX FUV observations are first continuum selected. This will lead to a fraction of continuum-faint objects with high EWs being missed, which will extend the tail of the distribution. However, because the bulk of the luminosity comes from low-EW galaxies, the LFs are will be largely unaffected.

In light of the extended Lyα halos discussed in Section 5.2, we may ask whether much Lyα also extends beyond the spectroscopic extraction apertures of GALEX. These spectra are extracted using an optimal model of the point spread function (PSF, Morrissey et al. Reference Morrissey2007), which has FWHM of ≈ 5 arcsec. At z = 0.3 (z = 1), this aperture corresponds to a spatial scale of 22 (40) kpc, and thus one-dimensional spectra are summed over scales that exceed this. At z ~ 0.3, the aperture is five times the median Lyα Petrosian radius in LARS, and while we do not known precisely how the Lyα profiles behave at larger radii, it is likely that in most cases GALEX captures the majority of the total flux. At z = 1, Barger et al. (Reference Barger, Cowie and Wold2012) discovered a giant Lyα blob, extended over an 18-arcsec diameter, but also measure such objects to be extremely rare (one in the whole volume). Moreover, aperture sizes (≈ 5 arcsec at z = 0.3) are equivalent to a 3-arcsec diameter aperture at z = 2, so if halo extension does significantly affect the recovered Lyα flux, it is likely by a similar factor as in high-z observations.

6.2 The properties of nearby Lyman alpha galaxies

Unlike most high-z studies, both the GALEX and HST samples are sufficiently close that many of their properties may be systematically measured. I assemble some of the key data obtained from these telescopes in Figure 12, and in this section discuss what we have learned about galaxies that emit, and do not emit, Lyα.

Figure 12. Scatter plots to the Left show the observed global Lyα/Hα ratio measured by GALEX (pink squares) and HST (dark blue circles). For the GALEX samples, data are assembled from Cowie et al. (Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011), Scarlata et al. (Reference Scarlata2009), Finkelstein et al. (Reference Finkelstein, Cohen, Moustakas, Malhotra, Rhoads and Papovich2011), and Atek et al. (Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Mas-Hesse, Hayes, Östlin and Kneib2014); for the HST samples data are taken from Östlin et al. (Reference Östlin, Hayes, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Petrosian and Atek2009, Reference Östlin2014) and Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2013, Reference Hayes2014). Note that because of the differing quantities plotted on the abscissa, the figures do not necessarily include the same number of points. Furthermore, since these points are chosen to have Lyα in emission, the non-emitting population cannot be visualised. Upper Left: the absolute UV magnitude in the AB system. Upper Right: the Hα equivalent width. Lower Left: the Hα/Hβ ratio, where the black line shows the effect of dust attenuation (Calzetti et al. Reference Calzetti, Armus, Bohlin, Kinney, Koornneef and Storchi-Bergmann2000 law), assuming Lyα/Hα=8.7 and Hα/Hβ=2.86. Lower Right: the [Nii]λ6584 Å/Hα ratio (=N2 index). Histograms to the Right compare the frequency of GALEX-LAEs (pink filled histograms) and non-Lyα-emitting galaxies (green outlined histogram), as a function of W (upper) and N2 index (lower).

6.2.1 Stellar populations

Over the Lyα luminosity ranges probed by low-z Lyα observations (~ 1042 erg s−1), known LAEs have typical stellar masses on the order of ~ 109 M (Finkelstein et al. Reference Finkelstein, Cohen, Moustakas, Malhotra, Rhoads and Papovich2011; Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2014). This is significantly higher than estimates made for most LAE samples at high-z, while the Lyα luminosities are equivalent or somewhat lower. This difference in the M/L(Lyα) reflects the fact that the average nearby galaxy is more evolved, and has had substantially more time to build stellar mass than a similarly selected galaxy in the more distant universe.

This evolution is also reflected in recovered stellar ages. However, caution is needed here: when estimated from SED fitting age is a luminosity-weighted average, and wavelength-dependent function of the included bands and the range of permitted star-formation histories. Finkelstein et al. (Reference Finkelstein, Cohen, Moustakas, Malhotra, Rhoads and Papovich2011) find a wide range of SED-fit ages with a median of ~ 300 Myr. However, when subtracting an underlying population of old stars, Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2014) determine recent star-formation to have occurred in short bursts with luminosity-weighted ages up to a few tens of Myr. This suggests that Lyα-emitting galaxies, like starbursts in general, have temp temporarily elevated SFRs. The total Lyα luminosity shows no dependency upon stellar age, but both W Lyα and the relative throughput (f Lyαesc) are higher in younger galaxies.

The above would suggest that Lyα escape fractions and EWs are higher in galaxies with higher Hα EW, which roughly measures the specific SFR (sSFR). Cowie et al. (Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011) indeed show that the fraction of Lyα-emitting galaxies increases when progressively higher Hα EW thresholds are applied, finding almost 60% LAEs in sub-samples of W > 250 Å. Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2014) similarly find that all their galaxies with f Lyαesc above 10% have Hα EWs above 400 Å. Interestingly, however this effect is not visible when comparing the Lyα/Hα ratio (or W Lyα) with W (Figure 12) for the objects with W Lyα > 20 Å. The most convincing results emerge when we compare the average properties of LAE and non-LAE samples.

6.2.2 Galaxy morphology

In UV-selected local galaxies, the objects with the highest W Lyα and f Lyαesc are found to be among the more compact ones. LARS galaxies tend to have particularly compact UV morphologies and LAEs are found among those with Petrosian radii of ~ 1 kpc on average, similar to higher redshift results of Malhotra et al. (Reference Malhotra, Rhoads, Finkelstein, Hathi, Nilsson, McLinden and Pirzkal2012). Larger galaxies all show lower W Lyα.

Galaxies hosting Lyα-emitting starbursts represent a mixture of various types, although still a mixture that is distinct from the UV-selected galaxy population in general. The LAEs contain a higher fraction of compact galaxies and merging systems. More curiously, an enhanced fraction of the GALEX LAE disks appear to be face-on (Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010). This phenomenon is also expected from radiative transfer modelling (Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Dubois, Blaizot, Garel, Bacon, Devriendt, Guiderdoni and Slyz2012; Laursen et al. Reference Laursen, Duval and Östlin2013), and suggests that orientation effects may hide some disks from Lyα selection. Unfortunately, current samples are not sufficiently large to test Lyα emission as a function of inclination angle.

6.2.3 Interstellar dust and metals

6.2.3.1 Dust

LAEs have bluer UV–optical colours than non-emitting galaxies of the same magnitude (Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010, Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011) but there is significant overlap in colours between the emitting and non-emitting sub-samples. UV-selected samples similarly exhibit higher Lyα escape fractions (f Lyαesc > 10%) where UV colours are bluer (β < −1.8; Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2014). This should be in part a reflection of the stellar age effects discussed in Section 6.2.1, but may also be due to dust extinction that reduces the Lyα throughput: Lyα/Hα ratios and escape fractions (independent of age) are both higher for bluer galaxies, not only EWs.

The average Lyα/Hα ratio found for the GALEX-selected LAEs is slightly above 2 (Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Hayes, Deharveng, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2009a; Scarlata et al. Reference Scarlata2009; Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2010), although perhaps surprisingly, plots comparing Lyα and Hα flux directly show no general covariance over more than 1 dex in each quantity. Examining Lyα/Hα however, the ratio decreases significantly with increasing Hα/Hβ, and the conclusion that dust reduces the transmitted Lyα in the LAE samples is shared over many studies. Indeed as shown in the lower left panel of Figure 12, the anticorrelation between Lyα/Hα and Hα/Hβ is one of the few trends that is significant over the dynamic range of today’s surveys.

The comparison of these line ratios with extinction laws reveals several curious features. First, at the lowest Hα/Hβ ratios, most of the galaxies lie below the predicted curves, and even in Lyα-selected samples only ~ 25% of Lyα photons escape when Hα/Hβ is in the range 2.8–3.2. These galaxies emit less Lyα than dust attenuation would predict. However, the same is not true for dustier galaxies: at Hα/Hβ ≳ 4 the mean Lyα/Hα ratio is ~ 1, even though from this Balmer decrement we would expect 97% of the Lyα radiation to be absorbed. Moreover, the locus of points in the Lyα/Hα–Hα/Hβ plane shows a trend that is much flatter than known extinction laws, and the normalised Lyα escape fraction (measured f Lyαesc divided by that which is expected for the derived dust content) increases with attenuation. Above E BV ≈ 0.3 Lyα emission becomes on average several times stronger than expected (Scarlata et al. Reference Scarlata2009; Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Mas-Hesse, Hayes, Östlin and Kneib2014; Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2014).

The most basic example of a simple screen of dust that reddens the nebular lines is incompatible with observation. Atek et al. (Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Hayes, Deharveng, Östlin and Mas-Hesse2009a) and Finkelstein et al. (Reference Finkelstein, Cohen, Malhotra and Rhoads2009) invoked the Neufeld (Reference Neufeld1991) geometry to explain this apparent enhancement of Lyα, in which dust is embedded within the Hi clumps of a multi-phase ISM, and Lyα scattering prevents photons from encountering dust. Radiative transport simulations show that this effective ‘boost’ of Lyα is very difficult to reproduce without rather contrived combinations of parameters (Laursen et al. Reference Laursen, Duval and Östlin2013; Duval et al. Reference Duval, Schaerer, Östlin and Laursen2014), and the predicted increase of Lyα EW with measured attenuation is not observed.

Scarlata et al. (Reference Scarlata2009) argue instead for a scenario that requires no such preservational scattering, but is still built upon a clumpy dust distribution (which may anyway follow the cold gas). This model does not require clumps to act as mirrors to Lyα and nor does it predict Lyα EW to rise with E BV. Similarly, Atek et al. (Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Mas-Hesse, Hayes, Östlin and Kneib2014) point out that a galaxy is likely made up of many Hii regions with a large variety of optical depths and since we see only down to an optical depth of 1 at each wavelength, observed radiation in each line (and continuum) comes from regions of different sizes. At the dusty end of the galaxy distribution, these latter two scenarios do not require any scattering at all, and indeed recently Martin et al. (Reference Martin, Dijkstra, Henry, Soto, Danforth and Wong2015) have shown that significant Lyα emission can be detected from ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs), from which it most likely escapes through holes in the ISM.

6.2.3.2 Metal abundance

Dust can absorb Lyα and metals cannot. At the UV luminosities probed by GALEX and LARS, the LAEs exhibit metallicities that overlap with the UV-continuum selected galaxies, but extend down to lower metal abundance. LAEs are on average deficient in nebular oxygen by about 0.4 dex (lower right panel of Figure 12), and are drawn mainly from a sub-populations with metallicities of 12 + log(O/H) ≲ 8.2. Indeed, a remarkable result from the GALEX studies is that the N2 index (=log([Nii]/Hα) segregates LAEs from non-emitters more cleanly than Hα/Hβ.

Part of this apparent preference for low-metallicity galaxies comes from an enhanced fraction of more compact irregular galaxies (Section 6.2.2), which are lower metallicity in general. Comparing Lyα EW with age and metallicity, Cowie et al. (Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011) suggest LAEs are drawn from a stage in the evolutionary sequence during which metals build up and Lyα EW decreases, in a similar way to that which would be expected for Hα. In addition, Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes2014) find that not only does EW decrease with age but also the Lyα escape fraction, which has no dependence upon stellar evolutionary stage. This shows that not only do older stellar populations produce less Lyα, but also that their ISM become more opaque to Lyα; this would also support hypothesis of dust buildup, although current samples do not have the statistical power to say whether this is purely a dust effect.

6.2.4 Neutral gas

While dust absorption is ultimately the process that can expunge Lyα radiation from a galaxy, Hi scattering determines the path length of Lyα between the nebulae in which it is produced and eventual emission. Here we discuss observations that probe the Hi phase directly by 21-cm emission, telling us about the total amount of Hi available for scattering, and its large-scale kinematics. For a discussion of the Hi properties measured on small scales by absorption line studies, see Section 4.

Masses in Hi, and the large-scale Hi envelope of individual galaxies can only be measured by 21-cm observations, which currently limits us to the nearby universe. However, to avoid Lyα absorption by the Milky Way and to separate the line from geocoronal emission, the lower limit of a galaxy’s recession velocity is cz ≳ 2500 km s−1. By this distance of ≈ 35 Mpc, Hi 21-cm observations are already challenging (Pardy et al. Reference Pardy2014).

Regarding the Lyα-absorbing dwarf galaxies, i Zw 18 is known to lie within a huge Hi envelope that is many times its optical size, with a central column density of N Hi ≳ 1021 cm−2 (van Zee et al. Reference van Zee, Westpfahl, Haynes and Salzer1998) and total mass of 7 × 107M. Thus if all the Hi were static with respect to the Hii regions, Lyα would see upwards of 107 optical depths at line centre. SBS 0335–052 exhibits very similar properties in both central Lyα absorption and large static Hi envelope (Thuan et al. Reference Thuan, Lipovetsky, Martin and Pustilnik1999). In cases like this, the fate of the Lyα radiation is unclear: does the Lyα scatter so many times that it is eventually absorbed by the small amount of available dust, or does the Lyα eventually leak out in a large, low surface-brightness halo that cannot easily be detected? Without very large aperture imaging observations that cannot be obtained with existing facilities, conclusive answers are difficult to provide.

Sixteen more starbursts (M UV = −17.5 to −21, from Östlin et al. Reference Östlin, Hayes, Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Leitherer, Petrosian and Atek2009 and the LARS sample), complete with Lyα imaging and spectroscopy from HST, have been observed at λ = 21 cm with the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) and/or Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA, Cannon et al. Reference Cannon, Skillman, Kunth, Leitherer, Mas-Hesse, Östlin and Petrosian2004; Pardy et al. Reference Pardy2014). Hi masses are between 109 to several 1010 M, which is 10–100 times as much as the dwarf galaxies, but for the seven galaxies where Hi detections are resolved the central column densities are comparable. All the Lyα-emitting objects with f Lyαesc above 10% have Hi masses below 4 × 109M in these samples. While galaxies above this mass emit only a small fraction of their Lyα photons, several of the less Hi-massive galaxies also show f Lyαesc below a few percent, or in absorption. The same result is seen with dynamical masses derived from Hi line-widths. While it may be hypothesised that less Hi would permit more Lyα photons to escape, it cannot be ruled out that this anticorrelation between f Lyαesc and M HI is not simply reflecting the fact that higher f Lyαesc is also seen at lower stellar mass (Section 6.2.1) and is not causally connected with Hi.

Spatial resolution in these 21-cm observations is currently still low, even with the VLA, but in every case the Hi is resolved, and extends over more than 10 Petrosian radii in the UV. Most galaxies show signs of tidal interactions, both in their 21-cm morphologies and line shapes. Perhaps most interestingly ESO 338–IG04, IRAS 08339+6517 (Cannon et al. Reference Cannon, Skillman, Kunth, Leitherer, Mas-Hesse, Östlin and Petrosian2004), and Arp 238 (LARS 03, Pardy et al. Reference Pardy2014) show long Hi tidal streams and debris trails: in the cases of ESO 338–IG04 and IRAS 08339+6517 these streams stretch over 50–100 kpc to companion objects, while in Arp 238 a huge (M ~ 2 × 109M ) Hi body has been ejected that contains no apparent companion galaxy at the level of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) imaging.

7 SYNTHESIsING THE OBSERVATIONAL DATA: WHAT MAKES A LYMAN ALPHA EMITTER?

As we have seen in Sections 4, 5, and 6.2, current data show that W Lyα and f Lyαesc are influenced by a large number of physical properties. In recent years, much attention has been devoted to determining their order of precedence: i.e. whether covering fraction is more important than kinematic properties, which in turn is more important than dust reddening. Mostly, we have been driven to find a way to predict the emergent Lyα flux, EW or f Lyαesc from a given set of conditions. We have now assembled significant samples of low-z observations, selected by Lyα, Hα, and UV continuum, and have studied various subsets of them between the X-ray and radio, measuring all the physical properties discussed in Section 6. By combining this literature, we now have substantial power to determine how Lyα is regulated and test for the primary effects in homogeneously selected galaxies that do and do not emit Lyα.

Simultaneously, we need to explain the following:

  1. (a) Why only ≈ 5% of local UV-selected galaxies (down to the SFRs of ≈ 4M yr−1, that are within reach of GALEX) show W Lyα above 20 Å.

  2. (b) Why f Lyαesc and E BV are anticorrelated in Lyα-selected galaxies, but many galaxies significantly outline this relationship; that many seemingly dust-free galaxies absorb their Lyα, while many dusty galaxies exhibit f Lyαesc that appears too high for their extinction.

  3. (c) Why higher W Lyα and f Lyαesc are found among galaxies with lower stellar mass and metallicity, and younger stellar age.

  4. (d) Why higher W Lyα and f Lyαesc are found among more compact galaxies and face-on spirals.

  5. (e) Why Lyα emission, at least on small scales, is frequently associated with galaxy outflows, and the spectroscopic line profile is almost always asymmetric.

  6. (f) Why among our highest EW Lyα-emitting galaxies, we often infer covering fractions below unity (measured from, Cii and Siii) or low Hi column densities.

In doing so, we must remain cognizant of the fact that data have been assembled from different selection functions, measurements have been made in apertures that probe a variety of physical sizes, and that large-scale halo emission may affect some, but not all, of our results.

We first address stellar properties, as these dictate the intrinsic W Lyα but do not affect transmission (i.e. they have no direct influence over f Lyαesc, and only set a limit on the emergent W Lyα). Since Lyα is reprocessed ionising continuum, W Lyα will exceed 20 Å only during for ages below ≈ 6 Myr (Leitherer et al. Reference Leitherer1999, and Section 2.1), assuming an SSP. The SSP assumption is probably over-simplistic for whole galaxies but it does serve to illustrate that the Lyα-bright period cannot be sustained if the SFR is declining, and that episodes must be young. The Lyα production must be most strongly correlated with the evolutionary stage of the stars.

However, the observed W Lyα is not strongly correlated with instantaneous SFR, and neither are the high-EW galaxies the most luminous in Lyα. If anything the reverse is true, at least within the current samples, and over the UV and Lyα luminosity ranges probed at low-z, high-EW galaxies are among the less luminous. Indeed, similar can be said for galaxy samples selected by other emission lines such as Hα or [Oiii]λ5007 (e.g Atek et al. Reference Atek2011): the requirement for high-EW line emission necessitates not only ongoing star formation, but at a given SFR the UV continuum must be faint enough for the EW to be high. This at least partially explains why local LAEs are drawn from galaxies with higher Hα EWs (as seen by, e.g., Cowie et al. Reference Cowie, Barger and Hu2011), and at lower stellar age and mass. Considering the well-known mass–metallicity relationship (Tremonti et al. Reference Tremonti2004), it equally well explains why LAEs should be more prevalent at lower metallicities. Note, however, that according to current spectroscopic Lyα data, this relationship does not extend indefinitely to the lowest metallicity, gas-rich dwarf galaxies; a point to which we will return below.

Lyα transfer however is not affected by any of the above considerations: stellar age, mass, and nebular oxygen abundance are not properties that influence radiation, although they may correlate with quantities that do. What matters from this point is the properties of dust and Hi. f Lyαesc is anticorrelated with the E BV, as would be expected, but the spread is very large. Moreover the slope of the f LyαescE BV relationship in LAE samples is flatter than would be expected for pure extinction (Atek et al. Reference Atek, Kunth, Schaerer, Mas-Hesse, Hayes, Östlin and Kneib2014), indicating that the role of dust is diminished. At the dust-free end the under-luminous Lyα can be most easily be explained by the presence of Hi, as it may scatter Lyα photons many times, and increase the probability of dust absorption. This is supported by, for example, small aperture spectroscopic observations of almost dust-free dwarf galaxies that show not only a lack of nebular Lyα but also the absorption of continuum photons in the Lyα resonance.

If this dust were distributed purely as a screen surrounding the star-forming regions, the apparent over-luminous Lyα observed in some LAEs cannot be explained without severely modifying extinction laws. Lyα would have to see at least the expected attenuation, plus an excess of absorption because of scattering. To explain this, we must invoke geometrical effects. Evenly mixing dust into the Hii regions would produce an effective attenuation of the form f Lyαesc ∝1/τdust at high τdust, and asymptotically sets a lower limit to Lyα/Hα ratio of ≈ 2 (without scattering). However, such a dust geometry cannot make high a Hα/Hβ ratio, which saturates for optically thick nebulae at ≈ 4. What can explain the simultaneous high Lyα/Hα and Hα/Hβ ratios is a clumpy distribution of dust, as advocated by Scarlata et al. (Reference Scarlata2009). This model, originally implemented by Natta & Panagia (Reference Natta and Panagia1984) and Caplan & Deharveng (Reference Caplan and Deharveng1986), assumes dust to be distributed in dense clumps and the effective attenuation law changes significantly with the average number of clumps along the line of sight. For example, again without scattering, varying τdust within 10 clumps may produce Lyα/Hα > 2 with Hα/Hβ ≈ 7, and can explain the line ratios seen in the dustiest local LAEs. The fact that Lyα is seen at all from local ULIRGs (Martin et al. Reference Martin, Dijkstra, Henry, Soto, Danforth and Wong2015) also suggests that Lyα must find paths of low dust optical depth.

Then we need to explain why the local dwarf galaxies (e.g. i Zw 18, SBS 0335–052) centrally absorb at Lyα despite their very low dust contents. Indeed, HST spectroscopy shows some absorption component in every object observed, demonstrating that Hi has effects that range between small dips and very broad, damped absorption features. Tenorio-Tagle et al. (Reference Tenorio-Tagle, Silich, Kunth, Terlevich and Terlevich1999) presented an evolutionary sequence for the Lyα spectral profile expected from a star cluster (assuming an SSP). This model assumes that during the earliest stages of a cluster’s evolution (≲ 2 Myr) local Lyα absorption would be expected because the surrounding medium is completely static. Over the subsequent ~ 4-Myr mechanical feedback from O star winds and the first supernovae accelerate the Hi outwards, producing P Cygni-shaped Lyα profiles. The application of this model to dwarf galaxies suggests that their star formation episodes may be too young and that feedback has not yet had time to accelerate the neutral ISM (Mas-Hesse et al. Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003).

This scenario is probably an over-simplistic representation of whole galaxies, where stars form in different regions over extended timescales, but nevertheless the qualitative arguments may be helpful in understanding the influence of galaxy winds. All the observed line profiles, including those of the local dwarf galaxies, can in principle be unified within such a scenario (Mas-Hesse et al. Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003). In the complete literature of low-z galaxies, only one example shows symmetric Lyα emission without an obvious absorption component (Tol 1214–277, Thuan & Izotov Reference Thuan and Izotov1997), and as Figure 6 shows, an outflow in the neutral medium appears to be a requirement (but not uniquely sufficient) for net Lyα emission (Kunth et al. Reference Kunth, Mas-Hesse, Terlevich, Terlevich, Lequeux and Fall1998; Wofford et al. Reference Wofford, Leitherer and Salzer2013; Rivera-Thorsen et al. Reference Rivera-Thorsen2015).

8 PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS: THE MOST PRESSING QUESTIONS

With GALEX and HST Lyα observations now running to over 100 galaxies for each telescope, local samples are substantial. Nevertheless, several major questions still remain to be answered. This closing section is dedicated to outlining a handful of the most pressing questions that, while perhaps challenging, can be addressed within current samples, or with possible extensions, with present-day facilities.

8.1 What is the atomic gas distribution in star-forming galaxies?

The spatial distribution of emitted and absorbed Lyα must reflect some set of properties of the Hi gas. In very nearby galaxies, 21-cm observations have already revealed the structure of the atomic gas where, for example, the Hi Nearby Galaxy Survey (THINGS, Walter et al. Reference Walter, Brinks, de Blok, Bigiel, Kennicutt, Thornley and Leroy2008) and VLA-ANGST (Ott et al. Reference Ott2012) surveys have found an atomic medium that is largely inhomogeneous and clumpy. It is clear that if Lyα photons were injected in these galaxies, they would experience more scattering in some regions than others. Examining at least these 21-cm observations, we see that the Hi does not much resemble the shells and slabs in which many radiation transfer calculations are done. In order to empirically determine the effects that Hi and its distribution have on Lyα emission requires resolved observations of individual targets in both Hi and Lyα.

Currently, we may contrast average Lyα surface brightness profiles (e.g. Hayes et al. Reference Hayes2014) with those of the intensity at 21 cm (e.g. Bigiel & Blitz Reference Bigiel and Blitz2012). These samples show both Lyα and 21-cm intensity profiles that are best fit with Sérsic profiles that are close to exponential (n ~ 1), while UV/optical wavelengths in the LARS sample show significantly higher Sérsic indices (n ≳ 3). Does the Lyα surface brightness trace the gas column density? While curious, this may be entirely coincidental as the sample selection is very different in the two cases. Such observations established in the same galaxies would be enormously instructive in interpreting the Lyα halos of both galaxies at low and high redshifts.

It is unfortunate that resolutions attainable in 21 cm and in the UV/optical are not well matched; sampling small physical scales at 21 cm requires very local galaxies, while the redshift requirements to observe Lyα imply targets must lie beyond several tens of Mpc. Progress has been made by Cannon et al. (Reference Cannon, Skillman, Kunth, Leitherer, Mas-Hesse, Östlin and Petrosian2004) and Pardy et al. (Reference Pardy2014), but with synthesised beam sizes of ≈ 15 arcsec in the best case (usually much coarser), such Hi observations can place only two resolution elements inside the linear size of the ACS/SBC camera. However, VLA in configurations B and A can provide resolutions down to around 4 and 1.3 arcsec, respectively, albeit with a substantial increase in observing time. Observational programmes at higher resolution (VLA C and B configurations) are ongoing, but it is clear that large steps forward may be taken if Hi observations are pushed to the highest spatial resolutions, and such observations are now essential.

8.2 How is the Lyα spectral profile built?

The total integrated Lyα profile of a galaxy is built by emission from different regions, likely with differing kinematics, orientation, and with different contributions to the total Lyα. The spectral profiles of Lyα measured in small apertures tend to be P Cygni, with radiation absorbed from the blue and re-radiated in the red. In these small apertures, Lyα escape fractions are also low. However, imaging tells us that these photons are often not expunged from the system, but scattered back into the line of sight at different position, where large-aperture photometry measures significantly higher f Lyαesc. It is an unfortunately common feature of absorption spectroscopy that we rarely know the line-of-sight distance between the emitting sources and the absorbing gas.

Ideally, we would like to know where the frequency redistribution of Lyα occurs, and to what extent the halo emission shares the spectral profile of the more central regions where the starburst is located. For example, if frequency redistribution occurs close to ionising clusters and Lyα is singly scattered at large radii, the profile may indeed be similar over large distances. However, if photons also get caught for many scatterings in halo gas then a new kinematic structure may be encoded in the Lyα, or double-peaked profiles may be seen.

To resolve this, we may take high-resolution spectra of the diffuse Lyα-emitting regions in galaxy halos. These observations would be best supported by aperture-matched optical spectroscopy of Hα or Hβ, to tightly constrain the rest velocity distribution of Lyα, and ideally also the highest possible resolution 21-cm observations (previous section). The best tool for this would be HST/STIS with narrow slits, which could provide resolutions of around 20 km s−1, but again at the cost of long integrations in faint regions. Mas-Hesse et al. (Reference Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Tenorio-Tagle, Leitherer, Terlevich and Terlevich2003) have shown that in IRAS 08339+6517, the blue wing of the Lyα profile sets on at a similar wavelength over at least 10 kpc, suggesting the star-forming regions are surrounded by a Hi medium that may be rather homogeneous in both space and velocity. However, 21-cm observations find gas at much larger radii, where Lyα has not yet been spectroscopically detected; whether the profile bends smoothly and traces the edge of a bubble, and how this effect may vary in different galaxies are all currently unknown.

8.3 Ionisation state of the interstellar medium

Section 6.2 discusses the effect of a large number of galaxy properties on the emission of Lyα. Many have been studied over time, but largely overlooked has been the effect of ionisation state of the ISM. Specifically ionising radiation from stars may not only produce recombination nebulae but also heat the diffuse warm medium. Thus as well as producing Lyα, the further propagation of LyC radiation may increase the ionisation levels of the diffuse gas, lowering the optical depth of the Hii regions to Lyman radiation (e.g. Pellegrini et al. Reference Pellegrini, Oey, Winkler, Points, Smith, Jaskot and Zastrow2012). Given that the ISM of galaxies may be very inhomogeneous, and that Lyα may be absorbed close the nebulae in which it forms, the propagation of ionising radiation could potentially have a large impact upon the first stages of Lyα transfer.

The ionisation parameter (the number of hydrogen-ionising photons per atom) governs the excitation of the gas, which is usually quantified observationally by the excitation parameter (an emission line ratio that contrasts high- and low-ionisation species). This is done most effectively by taking ratios of p 2 and p 3 ions: Zastrow et al. (Reference Zastrow, Oey, Veilleux, McDonald and Martin2011, Reference Zastrow, Oey, Veilleux and McDonald2013) performed ‘ionisation parameter mapping’ of several local starbursts using the [Siii]λ9069/[Sii]λ6716 ratio, to identify highly ionised cones that could signpost LyC emission. Similar integrated measurements of ‘Green Pea’ galaxies found high [Oiii]λ5007/[Oii]λ3727 ratios (Jaskot & Oey Reference Jaskot and Oey2013) that implies high ionisation states, and indeed these galaxies have been found to be high-EW LAEs (Jaskot & Oey Reference Jaskot and Oey2014; Henry et al. Reference Henry, Scarlata, Martin and Erb2015).

Currently, we do not know how these highly ionised regions affect Lyα on small scales in the ISM. Resolved Lyα imaging has now been obtained for over 50 galaxies with ACS, but as yet the ionisation structure has only been mapped in one of them. Bik et al. (Reference Bik, Östlin, Hayes, Adamo, Melinder and Amram2015) used VLT/MUSE observations of [Sii] and [Oiii] to map the ionisation parameter and gas kinematics in ESO 338–IG04, and compare with the Lyα imaging from Hayes et al. (Reference Hayes, Östlin, Mas-Hesse, Kunth, Leitherer and Petrosian2005). Two outflowing and highly ionised conical regions are revealed, that approximately align with the brightest Lyα regions. This would be consistent with a scenario in which Lyα may propagate with less scattering through these highly ionised regions, but the observations of one system cannot establish a causal relation, and a large sample of similar observations needs to be obtained. Pertinent observational questions include whether Lyα emission is systematically enhanced in regions of high ionisation, or whether chimneys through the ISM may feed brighter regions of Lyα emission in extended halos.

8.4 Can we predict Lyα observables from other information?

Given the importance of Lyα observations at both low and high redshift (see Section 1.1), a vital question becomes whether we can predict the Lyα escape fraction, EW, or line profile from a given set of quantities. That is, if we are given a dust content, a characteristic velocity for outflowing atomic gas, etc., do our predictions for Lyα emission/absorption match reality?

Given the absence of strong correlations involving Lyα (for example in Figure 12), one may be tempted to conclude that our understanding is not this sophisticated. However if, on the other hand, the Lyα that we observe is governed by geometrical considerations such as viewing angle, then averaged over many galaxies the answer may be more encouraging. For example it has been shown that transfer models inside homogeneous shells can reproduce very wide ranges of line profiles (Schaerer et al. Reference Schaerer, Hayes, Verhamme and Teyssier2011), similar to those that are observed globally at high-z; furthermore when coupled with semi-analytical models of galaxy formation, such models are able to reproduce the broad features of the Lyα LF over a wide range of redshift (Garel et al. Reference Garel, Blaizot, Guiderdoni, Schaerer, Verhamme and Hayes2012). This may imply that our more general picture of Lyα transport is correct.

It is not clear whether current samples are sufficiently large, or span a high enough dynamic range in luminosity/SFR for such an exploration. However, in the coming years, larger databases of global properties will become available; GALEX LAEs will remain at around 100 objects; HST spectroscopic samples already exceed this while imaging observations remain somewhat smaller. This should permit statistical studies using linear discriminant analyses, to determine how combinations of properties produce the observed Lyα characteristics. Many such possibilities may be envisaged if the signal is strong enough and the samples are sufficiently large.

More empirically motivated simulations can be performed using the wealth of data available for low-z galaxies as input. In such an approach, nature sets up the ISM instead of computers. For example, transport calculations have been run in synthetic galaxies output by hydrodynamical simulations (Laursen, Sommer-Larsen, & Andersen Reference Laursen, Sommer-Larsen and Andersen2009; Verhamme et al. Reference Verhamme, Dubois, Blaizot, Garel, Bacon, Devriendt, Guiderdoni and Slyz2012; Yajima et al. Reference Yajima, Li, Zhu, Abel, Gronwall and Ciardullo2014), although as yet there has been no attempt to construct realistic input conditions of a galaxy based upon observation. Such an experiment is not easy, especially without detailed knowledge of the Hi, but as that becomes available the more the study becomes a possibility. With maps of the ionising stellar population, nebular gas and ionisation structure, Hi distribution including large- and small-scale kinematics, it will become possible to generate sets of model galaxies that are based upon real systems for which Lyα observations have been obtained. Transfer simulations in such models will then recover the Lyα morphology and spectral profile, that can be tested against observation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I acknowledge the support of the Swedish Research Council, Vetenskapsrådet and the Swedish National Space Board (SNSB). This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I would like to extend warm thanks to my friends and collaborators for comments and feedback on the manuscript: John Cannon, Mark Dijkstra, Daniel Kunth, Peter Laursen, J. Miguel Mas-Hesse, Jens Melinder, Héctor Otí Floranes, Ivana Orlitová, Daniel Schaerer, and Anne Verhamme. Lucia Guaita is thanked for making equivalent width tables available for Figure 11. Further, I would like to thank Göran Östlin, Claudia Scarlata, Sebastiano Cantalupo, Len Cowie, and many others, especially those from the 2013 NORDITA Lyα workshops, for valuable and stimulating discussions. I thank the anonymous referee for several careful readings of the manuscript, and providing many thoughtful comments that have greatly improved the content.

References

Atek, H., Kunth, D., Hayes, M., Östlin, G., & Mas-Hesse, J. M. 2008, A&A, 488, 491Google Scholar
Atek, H., Kunth, D., Schaerer, D., Hayes, M., Deharveng, J. M., Östlin, G., & Mas-Hesse, J. M. 2009a, A&A, 506, L1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atek, H., Kunth, D., Schaerer, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Hayes, M., Östlin, G., & Kneib, J.-P. 2014, A&A, 561, A89Google Scholar
Atek, H., Schaerer, D., & Kunth, D. 2009b, A&A, 502, 791Google Scholar
Atek, H. 2011, ApJ, 743, 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, R. 2010, in Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser, Vol. 7735, 8Google Scholar
Barger, A. J., Cowie, L. L., & Wold, I. G. B. 2012, ApJ, 749, 106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigiel, F., & Blitz, L. 2012, ApJ, 756, 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bik, A., Östlin, G., Hayes, M., Adamo, A., Melinder, J., & Amram, P. 2015, A&A, 576, L13Google Scholar
Blanc, G. A., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bland, J., & Tully, B. 1988, Nature, 334, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borthakur, S., Heckman, T. M., Leitherer, C., & Overzier, R. A. 2014, Science, 346, 216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzetti, D., & Kinney, A. L. 1992, ApJ, 399, L39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calzetti, D., Kinney, A. L., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 1994, ApJ, 429, 582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, J. M., Skillman, E. D., Kunth, D., Leitherer, C., Mas-Hesse, M., Östlin, G., & Petrosian, A. 2004, ApJ, 608, 768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantalupo, S., Lilly, S. J., & Haehnelt, M. G. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, J., & Deharveng, L. 1986, A&A, 155, 297Google Scholar
Charlot, S., & Fall, S. M. 1993, ApJ, 415, 580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciardullo, R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 744, 110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Hu, E. M. 2010, ApJ, 711, 928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., & Hu, E. M. 2011, ApJ, 738, 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danforth, C. W., et al. 2014, arXiv:1402.2655Google Scholar
Davidsen, A. F., Hartig, G. F., & Fastie, W. G. 1977, Nature, 269, 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deharveng, J. M., Joubert, M., & Kunth, D. 1986, in Star-forming Dwarf Galaxies and Related Objects, ed. Kunth, D., Thuan, T. X., Thanh Van, J. Tran, Lequeux, J., & Audouze (SAO/NASA ADS), J., 431–437Google Scholar
Deharveng, J.-M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekel, A., et al. 2009, Nature, 457, 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, M., & Jeeson-Daniel, A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 3333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A., Henry, A., Martin, C. L., Sawicki, M., McCarthy, P., & Villaneuva, E. 2015, ApJ, 806, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duval, F., Schaerer, D., Östlin, G., & Laursen, P. 2014, A&A, 562, A52Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. L., Cohen, S. H., Malhotra, S., & Rhoads, J. E. 2009, ApJ, 700, 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, S. L., Cohen, S. H., Moustakas, J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., & Papovich, C. 2011, ApJ, 733, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garel, T., Blaizot, J., Guiderdoni, B., Schaerer, D., Verhamme, A., & Hayes, M. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giavalisco, M., Koratkar, A., & Calzetti, D. 1996, ApJ, 466, 831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, J. P., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, J. P., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guaita, L., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guaita, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 714, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, L. W., Huchra, J. P., & Geller, M. J. 1984, ApJ, 287, 487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, L. W., Huchra, J. P., Geller, M. J., O’Brien, P., & Wilson, R. 1988, ApJ, 326, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, T., Ouchi, M., Shimasaku, K., Ono, Y., Nakajima, K., Rauch, M., Lee, J., & Okamura, S. 2013, ApJ, 765, 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M., Östlin, G., Atek, H., Kunth, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Leitherer, C., Jiménez-Bailón, E., & Adamo, A. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M., Östlin, G., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Kunth, D., Leitherer, C., & Petrosian, A. 2005, A&A, 438, 71Google Scholar
Hayes, M., et al. 2010, Nature, 464, 562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 765, L27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, M., Schaerer, D., Östlin, G., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Atek, H., & Kunth, D. 2011, ApJ, 730, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, T. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A., Scarlata, C., Martin, C. L., & Erb, D. 2015, arXiv:1505.05149Google Scholar
Hill, G. J., et al. 2008, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 399, Panoramic Views of Galaxy Formation and Evolution, ed. Kodama, T., Yamada, T., & Aoki, K., (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.), 115Google Scholar
Hoopes, C. G., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Kakazu, Y., & Barger, A. J. 2009, ApJ, 698, 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., & McMahon, R. G. 1998, ApJ, 502, L99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummer, D. G., & Storey, P. J. 1987, MNRAS, 224, 801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, B. L., Aloisi, A., Heckman, T., Sohn, S. T., & Wolfe, M. A. 2014, ApJ, 795, 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaskot, A. E., & Oey, M. S. 2013, ApJ, 766, 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaskot, A. E., & Oey, M. S. 2014, ApJ, 791, L19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, H., Hayes, M., Iliev, I. T., Laursen, P., Mellema, G., & Zackrisson, E. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. A., Ellis, R. S., Schenker, M. A., & Stark, D. P. 2013, ApJ, 779, 52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalberla, P. M. W., Burton, W. B., Hartmann, D., Arnal, E. M., Bajaja, E., Morras, R., & Pöppel, W. G. L. 2005, A&A, 440, 775Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr 1983, ApJ, 272, 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr, & Kent, S. M. 1983, AJ, 88, 1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kereš, D., Katz, N., Weinberg, D. H., & Davé, R. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinney, A. L., Bohlin, R. C., Calzetti, D., Panagia, N., & Wyse, R. F. G. 1993, ApJS, 86, 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunth, D., Leitherer, C., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Östlin, G., & Petrosian, A. 2003, ApJ, 597, 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunth, D., Lequeux, J., Sargent, W. L. W., & Viallefond, F. 1994, A&A, 282, 709Google Scholar
Kunth, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Terlevich, E., Terlevich, R., Lequeux, J., & Fall, S. M. 1998, A&A, 334, 11Google Scholar
Lacy, J. H., et al. 1982, ApJ, 256, 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzetta, K. M., Bowen, D. V., Tytler, D., & Webb, J. K. 1995, ApJ, 442, 538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, P., Duval, F., & Östlin, G. 2013, ApJ, 766, 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laursen, P., Sommer-Larsen, J., & Andersen, A. C. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebouteiller, V., Heap, S., Hubeny, I., & Kunth, D. 2013, A&A, 553, A16Google Scholar
Leitherer, C., Chandar, R., Tremonti, C. A., Wofford, A., & Schaerer, D. 2013, ApJ, 772, 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitherer, C., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lequeux, J., Kunth, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1995, A&A, 301, 18Google Scholar
Madau, P., & Dickinson, M. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 415Google Scholar
Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., Finkelstein, S. L., Hathi, N., Nilsson, K., McLinden, E., & Pirzkal, N. 2012, ApJ, 750, L36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C., et al. 2010, in Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser., Vol. 7735, 0Google Scholar
Martin, C. L., Dijkstra, M., Henry, A., Soto, K T., Danforth, C W., & Wong, J. 2015, ApJ, 803, 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mas-Hesse, J. M., Kunth, D., Tenorio-Tagle, G., Leitherer, C., Terlevich, R. J., & Terlevich, E. 2003, ApJ, 598, 858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, D. L., & Terlevich, R. 1981, ApJ, 246, L109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrissey, P., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natta, A., & Panagia, N. 1984, ApJ, 287, 228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, D. A. 1991, ApJ, 370, L85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oke, J. B., & Zimmerman, B. 1979, ApJ, 231, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterbrock, D. E. 1962, ApJ, 135, 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östlin, G., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östlin, G., Hayes, M., Kunth, D., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Leitherer, C., Petrosian, A., & Atek, H. 2009, AJ, 138, 923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otí-Floranes, H., Mas-Hesse, J. M., Jiménez-Bailón, E., Schaerer, D., Hayes, M., Östlin, G., Atek, H., & Kunth, D. 2012, A&A, 546, A65Google Scholar
Ott, J., et al. 2012, AJ, 144, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, J., Walter, F., & Brinks, E. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardy, S. A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, R. B., & Peebles, P. J. E. 1967, ApJ, 147, 868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, E. W., Oey, M. S., Winkler, P. F., Points, S. D., Smith, R. C., Jaskot, A. E., & Zastrow, J. 2012, ApJ, 755, 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña-Guerrero, M. A., & Leitherer, C. 2013, AJ, 146, 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentericci, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 793, 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettini, M., Rix, S. A., Steidel, C. C., Adelberger, Kurt L., Hunt, M. P., & Shapley, A. E. 2002, ApJ, 569, 742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchet, C. J. 1994, PASP, 106, 1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, J. X., Kasen, D., & Rubin, K. 2011, ApJ, 734, 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiter, A., Schaerer, D., & Fosbury, R. A. E. 2010, A&A, 523, A64Google Scholar
Rauch, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, 856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Thorsen, T. E., et al. 2015, ApJ, 805, 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, K. H. R., Prochaska, J. X., Ménard, B., Murray, N., Kasen, D., Koo, D. C., & Phillips, A. C. 2011, ApJ, 728, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, B. D., & Sembach, K. R. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 279Google Scholar
Scarlata, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, L98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarlata, C., & Panagia, N. 2015, ApJ, 801, 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaerer, D. 2003, A&A, 397, 527Google Scholar
Schaerer, D., Hayes, M., Verhamme, A., & Teyssier, R. 2011, A&A, 531, A12Google Scholar
Schechter, P. 1976, ApJ, 203, 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., Pettini, M., & Adelberger, K. L. 2003, ApJ, 588, 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, D. P., Ellis, R. S., Chiu, K., Ouchi, M., & Bunker, A. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidel, C. C., Bogosavljević, M., Shapley, A. E., Kollmeier, J. A., Reddy, N. A., Erb, D. K., & Pettini, M. 2011, ApJ, 736, 160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Colbert, E. J. M., Hoopes, C. G., & Weaver, K. A. 2004, ApJ, 606, 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takada, M. 2010, in Am. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser., Vol. 1279, ed. Kawai, N. & Nagataki, S., 120Google Scholar
Tenorio-Tagle, G., Silich, S. A., Kunth, D., Terlevich, E., & Terlevich, R. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlevich, E., Diaz, A. I., Terlevich, R., & Vargas, M. L. G. 1993, MNRAS, 260, 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuan, T. X., & Izotov, Y. I. 1997, ApJ, 489, 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thuan, T. X., Lipovetsky, V. A., Martin, J.-M., & Pustilnik, S. A. 1999, A&AS, 139, 1Google Scholar
Tremonti, C. A., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tresse, L., & Maddox, S. J. 1998, ApJ, 495, 691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumlinson, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vader, J. P., Frogel, J. A., Terndrup, D. M., & Heisler, C. A. 1993, AJ, 106, 1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valls-Gabaud, D. 1993, ApJ, 419, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zee, L., Westpfahl, D., Haynes, M. P., & Salzer, J. J. 1998, AJ, 115, 1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veilleux, S., & Rupke, D. S. 2002, ApJ, 565, L63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhamme, A., Dubois, Y., Blaizot, J., Garel, T., Bacon, R., Devriendt, J., Guiderdoni, B., & Slyz, A. 2012, A&A, 546, A111Google Scholar
Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., Atek, H., & Tapken, C. 2008, A&A, 491, 89Google Scholar
Verhamme, A., Schaerer, D., & Maselli, A. 2006, A&A, 460, 397Google Scholar
Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., Bigiel, F., Kennicutt, R. C. Jr, Thornley, M. D., Leroy, A. 2008, AJ, 136, 2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wofford, A., Leitherer, C., & Salzer, J. 2013, ApJ, 765, 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wold, I. G. B., Barger, A. J., & Cowie, L. L. 2014, ApJ, 783, 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.-C., Boggess, A., & Gull, T. R. 1980, ApJ, 242, 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yajima, H., Li, Y., Zhu, Q., Abel, T., Gronwall, C., & Ciardullo, R. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastrow, J., Oey, M. S., Veilleux, S., & McDonald, M. 2013, ApJ, 779, 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zastrow, J., Oey, M. S., Veilleux, S., McDonald, M., & Martin, C. L. 2011, ApJ, 741, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. The first Lyα spectra of Hii galaxies. Main transitions and cosmic ray hits are labelled. The upper panel shows Mrk 701 (C 0842+163), with a redshift of z = 0.0522 and a metallicity of Z ≈ 0.4 Z. At the wavelength of λ = 1278 Å, the galaxy shows only a Lyα absorption feature. The lower panel shows a very different object – C 1543+0907, with a redshift of z = 0.0366 and metallicity of 1/10 the solar value. At the wavelength of λ = 1260 Å, the bright high-contrast Lyα emission line is obvious. Reproduced by permission of the AAS, from Meier & Terlevich (1981).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The observed ratio of Lyα/Hα fluxes, shown on a linear scale against nebular metallicity and the Hα/Hβ line ratio for the full sample of star-forming galaxies observed with the IUE, and reprocessed by Giavalisco et al. (1996). Negative Lyα/Hα ratios are the result of the Lyα feature being dominated by ISM absorption. The reference coding is MT81=Meier & Terlevich (1981), H84=Hartmann et al. (1984), H88=Hartmann et al. (1988), C94=Calzetti, Kinney, & Storchi-Bergmann (1994), CK92=Calzetti & Kinney (1992), D86=Deharveng, Joubert, & Kunth (1986), T93=Terlevich et al. (1993). The dotted black line shows the effect of the Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation curve, assuming intrinsic ratios of Lyα/Hα=8.7 and Hα/Hβ=2.86 and no scattering. Most of the galaxies lie far below this curve.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The Lyα spectra of first dwarf galaxies to be observed in the far UV with HST. The left panel shows i Zw 18, first observed with GHRS by Kunth et al. (1994). The geocoronal Lyα line has been masked out and is shown by a line set to zero flux at velocities of −500 to −2000 km s−1. No intrinsic Lyα emission is seen, and damping wings are visible that extend to at least 6 000 km s−1. Figure is taken from Mas-Hesse et al. (2003). The right panel shows Haro 2, first observed by Lequeux et al. (1995). Haro 2 has a much higher dust abundance than i Zw 18, but shows a strong Lyα emission line. Furthermore, the line profile is P Cygni-like, which indicates the intrinsically produced frequencies have been redistributed by scattering in an expanding neutral medium. Data are replotted from Mas-Hesse et al. (2003).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Very deep Lyα spectrum i Zw 18 obtained with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph. While previously referred to as a Lyα absorbing galaxy, i Zw 18 shows a very small but significant bump of Lyα emission. This bump is redshifted from the expected systemic velocity (the dot–dashed vertical line) derived from the Hα line. The overlaid red line shows the profile of Lyα transferring through a static shell of atomic hydrogen with a column density of log(NHI/cm−2) = 21.1, taken from the Schaerer et al. (2011) grid of transfer models. The strong emission feature is the geocoronal Lyα emission line. The inset shows the wider spectral profile.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Example images and Lyα spectra of local galaxies. Upper panels show colour composite images, encoding Hα in red, FUV continuum in green, and Lyα in blue. Dotted white lines indicate the size and position of the COS aperture. Lower panels show the corresponding spectra around Lyα (dark blue) and Siiiλ1260 Å (red). Objects are selected to illustrate the variety of Lyα and LIS profiles. Note the different velocity scales, which extend to ± 7000 km s−1 in the left-most frame but just ± 1500 km s−1 in the other two. The left object, LARS 09, shows a completely absorbed Siii profile that is centred at zero velocity. This absorbing gas removes 300 km s−1 (Full Width at Half Maximum [FWHM]) in the Siii line but completely damps the Lyα line, resulting in a FWHM that is 20 times broader. The centre plot, LARS 08, shows a similarly broad and saturated Siii profile, but one that is offset in velocity by ~ −250 km s−1. The blue wing of the Lyα absorption profile shows a similar shape and is offset in a similar way to the left panel, but in this case a redshifted Lyα line is emitted. The right panel shows an example of a strong Lyα-emitter, in which the Siii absorption is blueshifted by ≈ 350 km s−1, is far from saturated, and a very bright Lyα emission line is seen.

Figure 5

Figure 6. The relationship between WLyα and outflow velocity of the atomic gas. All measurements are made within spectroscopic apertures with HST/GHRS and COS. Where the Lyα absorption component dominates over emission, WLyα is set to zero. Δv is calculated from the average of velocity centroids of all observed LIS lines compared with the intrinsic velocity of the nebulae measured from optical emission lines. A cut of Δv = −50 km s−1 divides the sample in half by Δv, segregating galaxies with fast outflows from those with weakly outflowing, static, or inflowing neutral media. Grey points with errorbars represent the average and standard deviation of galaxies of these two sub-samples.

Figure 6

Figure 7. HST/ACS imaging of luminous blue compact galaxy Haro 11 (Kunth et al. 2003; Hayes et al. 2007). Upper Left: far UV continuum; Upper Right: continuum-subtracted Hα; Lower Left: continuum-subtracted Lyα. The Lower Right panel shows a composite of the other three images, with Hα in red, FUV in green, and Lyα in blue. The physical scale in kpc is shown on the axes. In the FUV image, the three main star-forming condensations (knots A, B, and C) are labelled in the nomenclature of Vader et al. (1993); the Lyα-emitting clump with no detection at any other wavelength (Knot D in Kunth et al. 2003) is labelled in the Lyα image.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Comparison of Lyα and Hα surface photometry for Haro 11. The abscissa shows the logarithmic Hα surface brightness, measured in individual pixels in the HST images, while the ordinate axis shows the corresponding surface brightness in Lyα, i.e. contours show the density of points when comparing pixel values in the frames from Figure 7. The red line shows the case B recombination line ratio of Lyα=8.7×Hα; intrinsically astrophysical nebulae produce Lyα and Hα radiation that follows this line. The plot is logarithmic, so only Lyα emitting regions can be visualised. Histograms above and to the right show the overall the distribution of light emitted as a function of surface brightness.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Extension of Lyα halos in the LARS sample; figure is taken from Hayes et al. (2013). The upper panel shows the Petrosian radius measured in Lyα plotted against that measured in Hα. The two galaxies that globally absorb Lyα are set to negative size. The dashed line shows the 1-to-1 line, and Lyα is on average twice the linear size of Hα. The lower panel shows the relative extension of Lyα compared to Hα, ξLyα. This example shows how the extension is anticorrelated with the UV continuum slope, β, which is commonly used as a proxy for the dust content in galaxies.

Figure 9

Figure 10. The Lyα luminosities probed by various galaxy surveys. Reference coding: C10=Cowie, Barger, & Hu (2011); W14=Wold, Barger, & Cowie (2014); H14=Hayes et al. (2014); R08=Rauch et al. (2008); G11=Guaita et al. (2011); B11=Blanc et al. (2011); C12=Cantalupo, Lilly, & Haehnelt (2012); H10=Hayes et al. (2010). Narrow-band surveys (G11, C12, H10) have been artificially randomised by Δz = 0.05 to aid visibility.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Left: The evolution of the Lyα luminosity functions with redshift. Turquoise line shows the z ≈ 0.3 LF of Cowie, Barger, & Hu (2010) and purple shows the z ≈ 1 LF of Wold, Barger, & Cowie (2014), measured by GALEX FUV and NUV, respectively. The dark red line shows the LF of Ciardullo et al. (2012), measured at z = 2.1 using narrow-band filters. Significant evolution is seen between the distant universe and the local one; grey arrows show the suspected modes of evolution in both luminosity and density (see the text for details). The dotted line shows the Hα LF at z = 0.2 of Tresse & Maddox (1998). Right: the cumulative Lyα equivalent width distribution at the same redshifts; data are taken from the same surveys, with the z ≈ 2.1 distributions from Guaita et al. (2010, 2011).

Figure 11

Figure 12. Scatter plots to the Left show the observed global Lyα/Hα ratio measured by GALEX (pink squares) and HST (dark blue circles). For the GALEX samples, data are assembled from Cowie et al. (2011), Scarlata et al. (2009), Finkelstein et al. (2011), and Atek et al. (2014); for the HST samples data are taken from Östlin et al. (2009, 2014) and Hayes et al. (2013, 2014). Note that because of the differing quantities plotted on the abscissa, the figures do not necessarily include the same number of points. Furthermore, since these points are chosen to have Lyα in emission, the non-emitting population cannot be visualised. Upper Left: the absolute UV magnitude in the AB system. Upper Right: the Hα equivalent width. Lower Left: the Hα/Hβ ratio, where the black line shows the effect of dust attenuation (Calzetti et al. 2000 law), assuming Lyα/Hα=8.7 and Hα/Hβ=2.86. Lower Right: the [Nii]λ6584 Å/Hα ratio (=N2 index). Histograms to the Right compare the frequency of GALEX-LAEs (pink filled histograms) and non-Lyα-emitting galaxies (green outlined histogram), as a function of W (upper) and N2 index (lower).