Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:58:23.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conscience and Catholicism: Rights, Responsibilities, and Institutional Responses. Edited by David E. DeCosse and Kristin E. Heyer . New York: Orbis Books, 2015. xxiii + 216 pages. $38.00 (paper).

Review products

Conscience and Catholicism: Rights, Responsibilities, and Institutional Responses. Edited by David E. DeCosse and Kristin E. Heyer . New York: Orbis Books, 2015. xxiii + 216 pages. $38.00 (paper).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

Timothy Kelly*
Affiliation:
Saint Vincent College
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © College Theology Society 2016 

Conscience and Catholicism grew from a 2014 seminar at Santa Clara University that explored Catholic conscience formation. David DeCosse's extended essay on the subject in the National Catholic Reporter spurred the seminar, and the US Catholic bishops’ conflict with the Obama administration over the Affordable Care Act—framed as a conscience issue—as well as John Paul II's and Benedict XVI's insistence on the primacy of the magisterium over individual consciences prompted DeCosse to write the NCR essay. The volume contains fourteen essays from individual authors with a revised version of DeCosse's original piece. The authors often refer to each other's contributions throughout, but each can be read independently of the broader collection.

DeCosse's NCR article argues that Catholic tradition identified three important principles in conscience formation: moral law, practical reason, and freedom. He saw the American bishops elevate moral law so powerfully as to crowd out the individual's incorporation of practical reason and freedom in forming his or her conscience. The contributors to this volume do not address DeCosse's framework directly, and perhaps for that reason his essay appears at the end rather than the beginning of the volume. But most of the essays amplify the more contextual development of conscience that challenges the primacy of moral law in an effort to “open up space for advancing an alternative view of conscience with deep roots in the Catholic tradition” (xvi). The volume accomplishes this aim well, and readers will come away with a richer appreciation for the ways humans form their consciences through their lived experiences—their engagement with their social, political, cultural, and biological environments. The authors present consciences as dynamic, contingent, and formed through conscious and unconscious dialogue with others.

The US context shaped DeCosse's initial offering, but fully half of the essays address conscience formation in theory or other lands. James Keenan, SJ, helps readers to see that US theologians came later to valuing a contextually informed conscience than did European Catholics. World War II's horrors and heroism pushed Europeans to look beyond a rigid conformity to moral manuals for guidance on living good lives. Humanae Vitae brought Americans to this same perspective. Osamu Takeuchi, SJ, proposes that a dialogue with Asian cultures will further contextualize Catholic conscience formation, and Eugine Rodrigues, BS, shares that India's efforts to force citizens to convert to Hinduism poses threats to individual consciences not seen in the United States since the Supreme Court fully embraced the separation of church and state. Emilce Cuda sees consciences forming in Argentina through political struggle in a cultural field, and concludes that the tension over same-sex marriage obscures the real questions of political power at stake in the debate. Agbonkhianmeghe Orobator, SJ, recounts the struggles that Catholic health-care ministers face in Africa over the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS.

Half of the essays in this volume focus on conscience formation in the United States in recent years. Readers might recognize some of these cases from their widespread media attention. Carol Bayley recounts the deliberations at a Catholic hospital that saved a patient's life by terminating her pregnancy. The local bishop withdrew both the hospital's Catholic identity and his permission to host masses on the premises, and told a woman religious on the ethics committee that she had excommunicated herself by participating in the care decision. Bryan Massingale sees unconscious racism shaping white Americans’ consciences as they react to police shootings of teenage African Americans. Linda Hogan suggests that we can debate marriage equality civilly only if we acknowledge that all participants act sincerely on their consciences.

Many of the authors draw explicitly from Gaudium et Spes on the Catholic support for individual conscience formation and the imperative that Catholics have to follow their own. The essays ground their positions firmly in Catholic tradition as they push the church to recognize and honor the “people's most secret core, and their sanctuary.” Reading this collection of essays, one comes away impressed with the authentic believers’ engagement with this central life purpose.