Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:02:47.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freezing effects and objects – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2011

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 249 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

The author would like to apologize for the following errors:

  1. (i) Page 166

    Currently reads as follows:

    1. (4)

      1. (a) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP [IP [a biography of ti] is going to be published/will appear this year]]]]?

      2. (b) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP that [IP [a biographer of ti] interviewed her/worked for her]]]]?

        (Lasnik & Park 2003: 650)

    1. (5)

      1. (a) [CP [Which candidate]i were [IP there [posters of ti] all over the town]]?

      2. (b) *[CP [Which candidate]i were [IP [posters of ti] all over the town]]?

        (Lasnik & Park 2003: 651)

        It should be:

    1. (4)

      1. (a) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP [IP [a biography of ti] is going to be published/will appear this year]]]]?

      2. (b) *[CP [Which Marx brother]i did [IP she say [CP that [IP [a biographer of ti] interviewed her/worked for her]]]]?

        (Lasnik & Park 2003: 650, from Merchant Reference Merchant2001: 185)

      1. (5)

        1. (a) [CP [Which candidate]i were [IP there [posters of ti] all over the town]]?

        2. (b) *[CP [Which candidate]i were [IP [posters of ti] all over the town]]?

          (Lasnik & Park 2003: 651, from Merchant Reference Merchant2001: 187)

      2. (ii) Page 169, lines 10–12 below example (14)

        Currently reads as follows:

        This follows from what Boeckx (2003) calls the Principle of Unambiguous Chain (PUC; see also N. Richards 2001, Rizzi 2006).

        It should be:

        This follows from what Boeckx (2003) calls the Principle of Unambiguous Chain (PUC; see also N. Richards 2001, Rizzi 2006; cf. Müller Reference Müller1998 on the Principle of Unambiguous Binding).

References

REFERENCES

Lohndal, Terje. 2010. Freezing effects and objects. Journal of Linguistics 47.1, 163–199.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting: A derivational approach to remnant movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar