Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:39:06.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conservation status of the narrow endemic gypsophile Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia in southern Spain: effects of habitat disturbance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2013

Miguel Ballesteros*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Ana Foronda
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Eva María Cañadas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Julio Peñas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
Juan Lorite
Affiliation:
Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain.
*
(Corresponding author) E-mail [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ononis tridentata L. subsp. crassifolia (Leguminosae) is a narrow endemic plant restricted to gypsum outcrops in south-east Spain. Its habitat and populations are currently threatened by anthropogenic disturbance. Because of the paucity of information concerning its distribution, abundance and response to disturbance, we assessed its status and evaluated the impacts of quarrying, ploughing, grazing and afforestation. Distribution and population size were estimated by field surveys, censuses and mapping. We measured cover, plant volume, fruit and seed production, seed predation and seedling recruitment to asses any effects of disturbance. The species’ area of occupancy is 1.6 km2 and its extent of occurrence 337 km2, in 29 habitat patches and 16 populations between 705 and 1,125 m altitude, and its population size was estimated to be 531,605. Quarrying, ploughing, overgrazing and afforestation negatively affected the species, in this order. We recommend this subspecies be categorized as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. A species recovery plan is required, and the ecological restoration of altered areas would mitigate negative effects on the species and improve the overall conservation of gypsum habitats.

Type
Plant Conservation
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna & Flora International 2013

This paper contains supplementary material that can be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org

Gypsum outcrops harbour rare and endemic flora restricted to this substrate (Mota et al., Reference Mota, Sola, Jiménez-Sánchez, Pérez-García and Merlo2004, Reference Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011), which is often negatively affected by human disturbances, especially quarrying (Mota et al., Reference Mota, Sola, Dana and Jiménez-Sánchez2003, Reference Mota, Sola, Jiménez-Sánchez, Pérez-García and Merlo2004). Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia (Dufour ex Boiss.) Nyman (Leguminosae) is a rare subspecies with a narrow distribution restricted to gypsum outcrops in south-east Spain (centre-west Granada province), where its habitat quality is declining because of anthropogenic disturbance (Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Cañadas, Benito, Peñas, Lorite, Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011). The Ononis tridentata complex is endemic to gypsum outcrops in Spain and Morocco (Supplementary Fig. S1). Other than taxonomic studies (Devesa & López, Reference Devesa and López1997) there is little information on the biology, distribution and conservation status of O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia. It is categorized on the Red List of the vascular flora of Andalusia as Data Deficient (Cabezudo et al., Reference Cabezudo, Talavera, Blanca, Salazar, Cueto and Valdés2005). Assessment of the conservation status of Data Deficient species is vital, as it can reveal the existence of threats (e.g. Good et al., Reference Good, Zjhra and Kremen2006). Following a preliminary assessment as Near Threatened (Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Cañadas, Benito, Peñas, Lorite, Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011), the aims of this study were to (1) assess thoroughly the subspecies’ conservation status, (2) quantify the impact of human disturbance, and (3) recommend conservation measures.

The distribution of O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia was first determined using biodiversity databases, including the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF, 2008) and Anthos (Castroviejo et al., Reference Castroviejo, Aedo and Medina2008), herbarium records (GDA and GDAC), and available literature (Devesa & López, Reference Devesa and López1997; Marchal et al., Reference Marchal, Lendínez, Salazar and Torres2008). Neighbouring areas potentially suitable for the subspecies were identified based on the ecology of known populations and aerial photographs. Field surveys were conducted during 2008–2011. Presence records were mapped, using Quantum GIS v. 1.7 (Quantum GIS Development Team, 2011), to establish the subspecies’ known extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO; IUCN, 2001). We estimated population size by counting all reproductive individuals in a total of 142 linear transects of 25 × 2 m (50 m2) throughout the subspecies’ known range, and extrapolating mean density to AOO. All the information available was then used to assess the status of O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia using the IUCN criteria (2001, 2011).

The impact of habitat disturbance was determined using qualitative data (IUCN/SSC, 2001), available literature (Cabezudo et al., Reference Cabezudo, Talavera, Blanca, Salazar, Cueto and Valdés2005; Escudero, Reference Escudero2009), information on land use (REDIAM, 2008) and earlier observations (Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Cañadas, Benito, Peñas, Lorite, Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011). Areas with four types of disturbance were considered: afforestation (with Pinus halepensis c. 15 years ago), gypsophile shrubland ploughed for cultivation but abandoned c. 15 years ago, topsoil removal (area quarried, with topsoil removed 2 years ago), and overgrazing by free-ranging goats and sheep. These were compared with apparently undisturbed areas (i.e. five ‘treatments’ in total). Three uniform plots were selected per treatment, giving 15 plots in total, with plots at least 100 m apart.

Cover was estimated using five intercept point transects of 25 × 2 m (50 m2), with three contact points per m (i.e. 75 per transect), in each plot. All reproductive individuals were recorded and recruitment was estimated by counting all seedlings along five transects of 10 × 2 m (20 m2) per plot. To determine size structure we randomly selected 30 reproductive individuals per plot (a total of 450 individuals) and estimated their volume as the volume of a semi-spheroid (Lorite et al., Reference Lorite, Peñas, Benito, Cañadas and Valle2010). To examine the effect of disturbance on the fitness of these selected individuals we counted the number of fruits produced at the end of July. To examine any effects of habitat disturbance on seeds, 10 ripe fruits were collected from each of 10 individuals per plot (i.e. a total of 1,500 fruits), dissected, and the number of well-formed, aborted and predated seeds counted. Well-formed seeds, by plot, were separated in 5 subsets of 5 seeds and weighed to a precision of ± 0.1 mg, and the mean weight per plot calculated.

We estimated the total number of individuals, with confidence interval, by bootstrapping the average density from censuses (n = 10,000, P < 0.05) and calculating it for the AOO. To evaluate the effect of habitat disturbance on the plant parameters examined, we fitted Generalized Linear Models, with a normal function for continuous variables, Poisson error distribution and log as a link function for count data, and binomial error distribution and logit as the link function for proportions. For some analyses we performed a multiple-comparison test with the Bonferroni correction. For all statistical analyses we used R v. 2.13 (R Development Core Team, 2011).

Using c. 20,000 presence records of the species we estimated AOO to be 1.6 km2 and EOO to be 337 km2 (Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Cañadas, Benito, Peñas, Lorite, Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011). The average density, from censuses (n = 142) and computed by bootstrapping (n = 10,000), was 0.33 m−2 (0.29–0.37, at P < 0.05). The estimate of the population is at least 531,605 (467,831–584,564, P < 0.05). We located the species in 29 habitat patches, forming 16 populations (defined as a patch or cluster of patches separated by at least 500 m; i.e. a pollinator's foraging distance, Gathmann & Tscharntke, Reference Gathmann and Tscharntke2002; Fig. 1). Projected habitat depletion from quarrying, assuming a 39.9% (63.9 ha) of habitat lost in the next 60 years (unpubl. environmental impact assessment), would involve the loss of 212,310 individuals (186,840–233,460, P < 0.05).

Fig. 1 Presence records of Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia recorded in our surveys. The rectangle in the inset indicates the location of the main figure in southern Spain.

Our findings suggest that O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia, should be categorized as Vulnerable, with criteria A3cd, D2 (IUCN, 2001, 2011): a projected population reduction (A3), with a decline in AOO, EOO and quality of the habitat (c), and actual or potential exploitation levels (d), and an AOO of < 20 km2 (D2).

The results show that all the disturbances examined have negative consequences for the species (Table 1): topsoil removal, ploughing, overgrazing and afforestation, in descending order. The number of seeds per fruit was similar between areas, although the predation rate differed significantly between areas and was greatest in undisturbed sites. This could be related to vegetation cover (Meiss et al., Reference Meiss, Le Lagadec, Munier-Jolain, Waldhardt and Petit2010), which was highest in undisturbed sites. There were no significant differences in seed weight between areas.

Table 1 Characteristics (mean values ± SE) of Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia in undisturbed areas and in areas subjected to four types of disturbance in southern Spain (Fig. 1), and results for Generalized Linear Models used to examine the effect of habitat disturbance on these characteristics (see text for details). Different superscripted letters indicate significant differences in the post hoc test after Bonferroni correction at P < 0.05.

The major threat to O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia is habitat destruction and fragmentation because of human activities, as for most narrow endemic species (e.g. Fenu et al., Reference Fenu, Mattana and Bacchetta2011; Peñas et al., Reference Peñas, Benito, Lorite, Ballesteros, Cañadas and Martínez-Ortega2011). In general all of the disturbances we examined have negative consequences for the species, except afforestation (where the pre-existing individuals were not removed during plantation). In studies of other species afforestation has been found to be detrimental (Maestre et al., 2004). As expected, quarrying and ploughing create the greatest disturbance. Mining has been shown to have significant impacts on gypsicolous flora (e.g. Mota et al., Reference Mota, Sola, Dana and Jiménez-Sánchez2003, Reference Mota, Sola, Jiménez-Sánchez, Pérez-García and Merlo2004). Livestock may enhance seed germination by digestive tract effects on hard-coated seeds (Baskin & Baskin, Reference Baskin and Baskin1998) and by eliminating interspecific competition or creating micro-niches for seedling colonization, but may injure seedlings by trampling and browsing (e.g. Hobbs, Reference Hobbs2001), as we observed in this study.

Our recommendations for the conservation of O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia are similar to those generally made for plants of gypsum habitats (Escudero, Reference Escudero2009): minimize the risk of direct destruction and fragmentation by controlling human activities and land use. Impacts could be reduced by identifying areas with good quality habitat for the species and then designing reserves composed of patches of habitat (Mota et al., Reference Mota, Martínez-Hernández and Guirado2011). The negative impacts of quarrying necessitate a recovery programme; we have found that the species responds to restoration, either as planting (authors, unpubl. data) or sowing with the appropriate soil preparation (Ballesteros et al., Reference Ballesteros, Cañadas, Foronda, Fernández-Ondoño, Peñas and Lorite2012). The habitat of O. tridentata subsp. crassifolia is included in the EU Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC) as a priority for conservation, and therefore no additional measures are needed in this respect. Our results will be put at the disposal of the regional government and taken into account in the development of measures to restore the vegetation of gypsum habitats in this area.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by KNAUF GmbH, Branch Spain. We are grateful to José Manuel Sánchez-Robles, Eva Moracho, José María González, Martí March, Javier Rodríguez, Antonio González and David Nesbitt for their assistance, and we thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

Biographical sketches

The research of the authors is devoted to the conservation of threatened and endemic flora and the ecological restoration of disturbed areas in Mediterranean environments. Miguel Ballesteros focuses on developing measures to recover gypsum habitats affected by quarrying in south-east Spain. Ana Foronda's research interests include biodiversity conservation and ecological restoration in areas affected by quarrying activities. Eva María Cañadas is interested in plant–environment relationships and their importance in plant conservation and habitat restoration. Julio Peñas is interested in biogeographical patterns and the conservation of endemic vascular plants in the Western Mediterranean region. Juan Lorite has worked on conservation biology and restoration ecology, with a special focus on montane areas. He is leading several projects on the conservation and restoration of gypsicolous habitats affected by quarrying.

References

Ballesteros, M., Cañadas, E.M., Benito, B., Peñas, J. & Lorite, J. (2011) Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia (Dufour ex Boiss.) Nyman. In Diversidad Vegetal de las Yeseras Ibéricas. El reto de los archipiélagos edáficos para la biología de la conservación (eds Mota, J.F., Martínez-Hernández, F. & Guirado, J.S.), pp. 261262. ADIF-Mediterráneo Asesores Consultores, Almería, Spain.Google Scholar
Ballesteros, M., Cañadas, E.M., Foronda, A., Fernández-Ondoño, E., Peñas, J. & Lorite, J. (2012) Vegetation recovery of gypsum quarries: short-term sowing response to different soil treatments. Applied Vegetation Science, 15, 187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, C.C. & Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds, Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
Cabezudo, B., Talavera, S., Blanca, G., Salazar, C., Cueto, M., Valdés, B. et al. (2005) Lista Roja de la flora vascular de Andalucía. Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.Google Scholar
Castroviejo, S, Aedo, C. & Medina, L. (2008) Anthos. Sistema de Información sobre plantas de España. Http://www.anthos.es [accessed 27 July 2008].Google Scholar
Devesa, J.A. & López, G. (1997) Notas taxonómicas y nomenclaturales sobre el género Ononis L. (Leguminosae) en la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, 55, 245260.Google Scholar
Escudero, A. (2009) 1520 Vegetación gipsícola mediterránea (Gypsophiletalia). In VV.AA., Bases ecológicas preliminares para la conservación de los tipos de hábitat de interés comunitario en España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Fenu, G., Mattana, E. & Bacchetta, G. (2011) Conservation of endemic insular plants: the genus Ribes L. (Grossulariaceae) in Sardinia. Oryx, 46, 219222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathmann, A. & Tscharntke, T. (2002) Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71, 757764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GBIF (2008) The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Http://www.gbif.org [accessed 27 July 2008].Google Scholar
Good, T.C., Zjhra, M.L. & Kremen, C. (2006) Addressing data deficiency in classifying extinction risk: a case study of a radiation of Bignoniaceae from Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 20, 10991110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R.J. (2001) Synergisms among habitat fragmentation, livestock grazing, and biotic invasions in Southwestern Australia. Conservation Biology, 15, 15221528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria v. 3.1. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria [accessed 31 January 2013].Google Scholar
IUCN (2011) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria v. 9.0. IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 31 January 2013].Google Scholar
IUCN/SCC (2001) Authority Files for Habitats, Threats, Conservation Actions and Utilization of Species. Http://data.iucn.org/Themes/ssc/sis/authority.htm [accessed 31 January 2013].Google Scholar
Lorite, J., Peñas, J., Benito, B., Cañadas, E. & Valle, F. (2010) Conservation status of the first known population of Polygala balansae in Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici, 47, 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestre, F.T. & Cortina, J. (2004) Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? Forest Ecology and Management, 198, 307317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, F.M., Lendínez, M.L., Salazar, C. & Torres, J.A. (2008) Aportaciones al conocimiento de la vegetación gipsícola en el occidente de la provincia de Granada (Sur de España). Lazaroa, 29, 95100.Google Scholar
Meiss, H., Le Lagadec, L., Munier-Jolain, N., Waldhardt, R. & Petit, S. (2010) Weed seed predation increases with cover in perennial forage crops. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 138, 1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mota, J.F., Sola, A.J., Dana, E.D. & Jiménez-Sánchez, M.L. (2003) Plant succession in abandoned gypsum quarries in SE Spain. Phytocoenologia, 33, 1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mota, J.F., Sola, A.J., Jiménez-Sánchez, M.L., Pérez-García, F.J. & Merlo, M.E. (2004) Gypsicolous flora, conservation and restoration of quarries in the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 17971808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mota, J.F., Martínez-Hernández, F. & Guirado, J.S. (2011) Diversidad Vegetal de las Yeseras Ibéricas. El reto de los archipiélagos edáficos para la biología de la conservación. ADIF-Mediterráneo Asesores Consultores, Almería, Spain.Google Scholar
Peñas, J., Benito, B., Lorite, J., Ballesteros, M., Cañadas, E.M. & Martínez-Ortega, M.M. (2011) Habitat fragmentation in arid zones: a case study of Linaria nigricans under land use changes (SE Spain). Environmental Management, 48, 168176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quantum Gis Development Team (2011) Quantum GIS. Http://qgis.osgeo.org [accessed 2 June 2011].Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation For Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Http://www.r-project.org [accessed 30 June 2011].Google Scholar
REDIAM (2008) Red de Información Ambiental de Andalucía. Consejería de Agricultura, Pesca y Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, Spain. Http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/medioambiente/site/web/rediam [accessed 10 August 2008].Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Presence records of Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia recorded in our surveys. The rectangle in the inset indicates the location of the main figure in southern Spain.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics (mean values ± SE) of Ononis tridentata subsp. crassifolia in undisturbed areas and in areas subjected to four types of disturbance in southern Spain (Fig. 1), and results for Generalized Linear Models used to examine the effect of habitat disturbance on these characteristics (see text for details). Different superscripted letters indicate significant differences in the post hoc test after Bonferroni correction at P < 0.05.

Supplementary material: PDF

Ballesteros Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Ballesteros Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 346.6 KB