Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:40:20.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bimbowrieite, NaMgFe3+5(PO4)4 (OH)6⋅2H2O, a new dufrénite-group mineral from the White Rock No.2 quarry, South Australia, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2023

Peter Elliott*
Affiliation:
School of Physics, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
Anthony R. Kampf
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
*
Corresponding author: Peter Elliott; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bimbowrieite, NaMgFe3+5(PO4)4(OH)6⋅2H2O, is a new mineral found in a mineralogically zoned rare-element bearing pegmatite at the White Rock No.2 quarry, Bimbowrie Conservation Park, South Australia, Australia. Crystals are dark olive green to greenish brown and are bladed with dimensions of up to 150 μm. Crystals occur as aggregates up to 0.4 mm across associated with ushkovite, bermanite, leucophosphite and sellaite. Bimbowrieite is pleochroic, biaxial (+), with α = 1.785(5), β = 1.795(5), γ = 1.805(5) and 2V(meas.) = 89.4(5)°. The average of 28 chemical analyses gave the empirical formula: (Na0.81Ca0.19)Σ1.00(Mg0.75Mn2+0.19Fe2+0.05)Σ0.99(Fe3+4.99Al0.01)Σ5.00(PO4)3.97(OH)5.88⋅2.05 H2O based on 24 oxygen atoms. Bimbowrieite is monoclinic, space group C2/c with a = 25.944(5), b = 5.1426(10), c = 13.870(3 Å, β = 111.60(3)°, V = 1720.4(7) Å3 and Z = 4. The crystal structure was refined to R1 = 1.97% for 1060 observed reflections with F0 > 4σ(F0). Bimbowrieite is isostructural with dufrénite. The structure is based on a trimer of face-sharing octahedra in which an M2 octahedra shares two trans faces with two M4 octahedra. Trimers link in the c-direction by sharing corners with two M3 octahedra and with T1 and T2 tetrahedra. Linkage in the a-direction is via corner-sharing M1 octahedra and linkage in the b-direction is via corner-sharing T1 and T2 tetrahedra.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland

Introduction

Minerals of the dufrénite group are known from many localities worldwide and occur as secondary minerals in a variety of environments; as late-stage minerals from hydrothermal alteration in granite pegmatites, in iron ore deposits and iron-rich gossans and in sedimentary phosphate deposits. The first crystal-structure investigation of minerals of the dufrénite group was completed by Moore (Reference Moore1970) who studied dufrénite from Cornwall, England. Other members of the dufrénite group (Table 1) are natrodufrénite (Fontan et al., Reference Fontan, Pillard and Permingeat1982), burangaite (Selway et al., Reference Selway, Cooper and Hawthorne1997), matioliite (Atencio et al., Reference Atencio, Coutinho, Mascarenhas and Ellena2006), gayite (Kampf et al., Reference Kampf, Colombo and González del Tánago2010) and bimbowrieite. Structure analyses have been published on all except natrodufrénite. The general formula for dufrénite-group minerals may be written as XM1M2M3M4(PO4)4(OH)6⋅2H2O with Na and Ca at the X site, trivalent cations Fe3+ and Al at the M1, M3 and M4 sites and divalent cations Fe2+, Mg and Mn2+ at the M2 site.

Table 1. Comparison of related minerals.

The new mineral bimbowrieite is named for the Bimbowrie Conservation Park in which the type locality is located (see below). The mineral and name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA2020-006, Elliott and Kampf, Reference Elliott and Kampf2020). The holotype specimen is deposited in the collection of South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, registration number G34762.

Occurrence

The White Rock No.2 quarry from which the type specimen was collected is located in the Bimbowrie Conservation Park, 24 km N of Olary, South Australia, Australia. Pegmatites and pegmatoids are ubiquitous throughout the region, and occur as sills, dykes, lenses and segregation bodies of ill-defined shape (Campana, Reference Campana1957). They have been intruded into rocks of the Archaean Willyama Complex. Willyama Supergroup rocks comprise upper greenschist- to amphibolite-grade metamorphosed and strongly deformed sedimentary and minor igneous rocks (Lottermoser and Lu, Reference Lottermoser and Lu1997), which are unconformably overlain by late Proterozoic Adelaidean metasediments. The White Rock pegmatite is one of more than 70 pegmatite bodies in the Olary Province of South Australia. It is a mineralogically zoned rare-element bearing pegmatite characterised by the occurrence of late-stage phosphate nodules between the quartz core and intermediate feldspar-rich zone and belongs to the beryl–columbite phosphate rare-element type in the classification of Černý (Reference Černý1991). Triplite–zwieselite was formed by metasomatic alteration of magmatic fluorapatite and has been transformed by hydrothermal alteration and weathering, in an oxidising, low-temperature, low-pH environment, to give a complex, microcrystalline intergrowth of secondary phosphate minerals (Lottermoser and Lu, Reference Lottermoser and Lu1997). At White Rock, three pegmatites with poor outcrops, up to 120 m long were mined for feldspar (both albite and microcline), muscovite and beryl over the period 1932–1973 (Olliver and Steveson, Reference Olliver and Steveson1982). Three quarries were excavated to a depth of 10 m with recorded production of 860 tonnes of feldspar and 8.1 tonnes of beryl. Triplite and associated secondary phosphate minerals have been exposed in only the No.2 quarry. Bimbowrieite occurs in seams in a matrix comprising triplite and fluorapatite. Associated minerals are ushkovite, bermanite, leucophosphite and sellaite.

Appearance and physical properties

Bimbowrieite occurs as aggregates of crystals to 0.4 mm across (Fig. 1). Crystals are dark olive green to greenish brown blades, up to 150 μm in length. The blades are flattened on {100} and exhibit the crystal forms {100}, {111} and {201} (Fig. 2). The streak is olive green, the lustre is vitreous, the tenacity is brittle and the fracture is irregular. There is one excellent cleavage on {100}. Optically, bimbowrieite is biaxial (+), α = 1.785(5), β = 1.795(5) and γ = 1.805(5) (measured in white light). The 2Vz measured on a spindle stage is 89.4(5)°; the calculated 2Vz is 90.5°. Dispersion is r < v, extreme. The optical orientation is Y = b, X ^ c ≈ 18° in obtuse β. The mineral is pleochroic with X = brown orange, Y = brown yellow, Z = blue green and Y < X < Z. The Gladstone–Dale compatibility index 1 – (K P/K C) for the empirical formula is 0.056 (good) (Mandarino, Reference Mandarino2007).

Figure 1. Greenish-brown crystals of bimbowrieite on fluorapatite, associated with ushkovite (orange) and sellaite (white). The field of view is 2.3 mm, South Australian Museum specimen G34762.

Figure 2. Crystal drawing of bimbowrieite (clinographic projection in standard orientation).

Infrared spectroscopy

The infrared spectrum (Fig. 3) of powdered bimbowrieite was recorded using a Nicolet 5700 FTIR spectrometer (range 4000 to 650 cm–1, transmission mode) equipped with a Nicolet Continuum IR microscope and a diamond-anvil cell. The spectrum shows a broad absorption band due to OH stretching vibrations with maxima at 3568 cm–1 and 3230 cm–1. According to the correlation given by Libowitzky (Reference Libowitzky1999), the approximate O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bond-lengths range between 3.1 and 2.6 Å. A band found at 1575 cm–1 is assigned to the ν2 H–O–H bending vibration of water molecules. The bands at 1194 and 1028 cm–1 may be assigned to the PO4 ν3 antisymmetric stretching vibrations and the band at 775 cm–1 is assigned to the PO4 ν1 symmetric stretching vibration.

Figure 3. The FTIR spectrum of powdered bimbowrieite.

Chemical composition

Quantitative chemical data were collected on two polished crystal aggregates using a Cameca SXFive electron microprobe (WDS mode, 20 kV, 20 nA, 5 μm beam diameter). Data were reduced using the ϕ(ρZ) method of Pouchou and Pichoir (Reference Pouchou, Pichoir, Heinrich and Newbury1991). Twenty-eight points were analysed (Table 2). The small amount of material available did not allow for the direct determination of H2O, so it was calculated give 10 H atoms per formula unit. The empirical formula, based on 24 O atoms, is (Na0.81Ca0.19)Σ1.00(Mg0.75Mn2+0.19Fe2+0.05)Σ0.99(Fe3+4.99Al0.01)Σ5.00(PO4)3.97(OH)5.88⋅2.05 H2O.

Table 2. Analytical data for bimbowrieite.

*Fe2O3 and FeO calculated to give full occupancy of the M1, M3, and M4 sites by Fe3++Al.

**H2O calculated from the crystal structure analysis.

S.D. = standard deviation

The ideal formula is NaMgFe3+5(PO4)4(OH)6⋅2H2O which requires Na2O 3.67, MgO 4.77, Fe2O3 47.27, P2O5 33.62, H2O 10.67, total 100 wt.%.

X-ray crystallography and crystal-structure determination

Powder X-ray diffraction data (Table 3) were recorded using a Rigaku R-Axis Rapid II curved imaging plate microdiffractometer with monochromatised MoKα radiation. A Gandolfi-like motion on the ϕ and ω axes was used to randomise the sample. Observed d values and intensities were derived by profile fitting using JADE Pro software (Materials Data, Inc.). The unit-cell parameters refined from the powder data using JADE Pro with whole-pattern fitting are: a = 26.07(2), b = 5.17(2), c = 13.95(2) Å, β = 111.56(2)° and V = 1749(7) Å3, which are in good agreement with the single-crystal study below.

Table 3. Powder X-ray data for bimbowrieite. Only calculated lines with I ≥ 6 are listed.

A crystal was attached to a MiTeGen polymer loop and X-ray diffraction data was collected at the micro-focus macromolecular MX2 beamline at the Australian Synchrotron (Aragao et al., Reference Aragao, Aishima, Cherukuvada, Clarken, Clift, Cowieson, Ericsson, Gee, Macedo, Mudie, Panjikar, Price, Riboldi-Tunnicliffe, Rostan, Williamson and Caradoc-Davies2018). Data were collected using a Dectris EigerX 16M detector and monochromatic radiation with a wavelength of 0.710760 Å. The data set was processed using XDS (Kabsch, Reference Kabsch2010) without scaling, and with absorption correction and scaling using SADABS (Bruker, 2001). Structure solution in space group C2/c was carried out using SHELXT (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015a) as implemented in the WinGX suite (Farrugia, Reference Farrugia2012). The atom coordinates were then transformed to correspond to those in the structure of dufrénite (Moore, Reference Moore1970). SHELXL-2018 (Sheldrick, Reference Sheldrick2015b) was used for the refinement of the structure. All H atom sites were located in difference-Fourier maps and were refined with soft restraints of 0.82(3) Å on the O–H distances. The site occupancies at the X site and the M2 site were fixed to (Na0.81Ca0.19) and (Mg0.75Mn2+0.19Fe2+0.05), respectively, in accordance with the electron microprobe data. The final refinement converged to an agreement index of R 1 = 1.97% for 1060 observed reflections with F o > 4σ(F o). Data collection and refinement details are given in Table 4, atom coordinates and displacement parameters in Table 5, selected bond distances in Table 6 and a bond valence analysis in Table 7. The crystallographic information file has been deposited with the Principal Editor of Mineralogical Magazine and is available as Supplementary material (see below).

Table 4. Crystal data, data collection and refinement details.

* R 1 = Σ||Fo|-|Fc|| / Σ|Fo|

wR 2 = Σw(|Fo|2–|Fc|2) 2 / Σw|Fo|2)½; w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0177 P)2 + 7.86 P];

P = ([max of (0 or F 02)] + 2Fc2)/ 3

Table 5. Fractional coordinates and displacement parameters (Å2) for atoms for bimbowrieite.

a Refined occupancy Na0.81Ca0.19

b Refined occupancy Mg0.75Mn2+0.19Fe2+0.05

Table 6. Selected interatomic distances (Å), angles (°) and hydrogen bonds for bimbowrieite.

Note: BLD = bond-length distortions (Renner and Lehmann, Reference Renner and Lehmann1986); OAV = octahedral angle variance (Robinson et al., Reference Robinson, Gibbs and Ribbe1971).

Table 7. Bond valence* (vu) sums for bimbowrieite.

* Bond-valence parameters used are from Gagné and Hawthorne (Reference Gagné and Hawthorne2015).

Bond valences for the X and M(2) sites are based on the refined occupancy.

The main feature of the structure is a trimer of face-sharing octahedra, the “h-cluster” described by Moore (Reference Moore1970), which is also a feature in the structures of a number of other basic iron-phosphate minerals. A central M6 octahedron shares two trans faces with two M6 octahedra, via the OH5, O6 and O7 anions, to form a trimer of the form [M 3ϕ12]. Linkage in the a-direction is via corner-sharing M1 octahedra and T2 tetrahedra. Trimers link in both the b-direction and the c-direction by sharing corners with M3 octahedra and with T1 and T2 tetrahedra (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. The crystal structure of bimbowrieite viewed along [010]. Hydrogen atoms are small grey spheres. The unit cell is outlined.

The X site occupies channels that run along [010] and is coordinated by six O atoms and two H2O molecules to form a square antiprism. The refinement yields an X site occupied by Na0.84Ca0.16 (12.43 epfu), in good agreement with the chemical analysis that shows Na0.81Ca0.19 (12.71 epfu). The bond-valence sum at the site of 1.34 is also in agreement with a mixed (Na,Ca) site population. Each of the M sites is coordinated by six anions in an octahedral arrangement. The M2 site is occupied by Mg plus minor Mn2+ and Fe2+ and is coordinated by four O anions and two OH groups. The site was refined with joint occupancy by Mg and Mn, yielding a site-scattering value of 16.32 e . This is greater than the site-scattering value of 15.17 e based on the site occupancy indicated by the empirical formula. The most likely explanation is that the crystal used for the structure determination was higher in Mn and lower in Mg than the crystal used for electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The large variations in these elements noted during the EPMA further support this explanation. Fe3+ occurs at three symmetrically distinct sites, M1, M3 and M4. The M1 site is coordinated by two O atoms, two OH groups and two H2O groups. The M3 site is coordinated by three O atoms and three OH groups and the M4 site is coordinated by four O atoms and two OH groups. The observed mean M–ϕ bond-lengths for the M1, M3 and M4 sites (2.018, 2.015 and 2.026 Å respectively) and bond-valence sums (Table 7) support the occupancy of the M1 site by Fe3+ plus minor Al. This is in agreement with the structure refinements of other members of the dufrénite group in which the smaller M1, M3 and M4 octahedral sites are dominated by either Fe3+ or Al. Of the M sites, M3 and M4 are more distorted in terms of bond-length distortion (BLD) and M2 and M4 are more distorted in terms of octahedral angle variance (OAV) (Table 6). Two symmetrically distinct sites, P1 and P2 in the structure are fully occupied by P. The PO4 tetrahedra show similar <P–O> distances and degrees of geometrical distortion.

There are three OH groups and one H2O group in the structure. The hydrogen bonding scheme (Table 6) for bimbowrieite is the same as that reported in previous studies on the dufrénite-group minerals burangaite (Selway et al., Reference Selway, Cooper and Hawthorne1997) and matioliite (Atencio et al., Reference Atencio, Coutinho, Mascarenhas and Ellena2006). The OH5 and OH8 groups provide hydrogen bonds accepted by O4 and O9, respectively. OW12 provides three hydrogen bonds accepted by O1, O3 and OH8. The hydrogen bonds are of weak to medium strength with O–O distances in the range 2.580 to 3.065 Å.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ben Wade of Adelaide Microscopy, The University of Adelaide for assistance with the microprobe analysis. The infrared spectrum was acquired with the assistance of the Forensic Science Centre, Adelaide. This research was undertaken in part using the MX2 beamline at the Australian Synchrotron, part of ANSTO, and made use of the Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) detector.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2023.86.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Daniel Atencio

References

Aragao, D., Aishima, J., Cherukuvada, H., Clarken, R., Clift, M., Cowieson, N.P., Ericsson, D.J., Gee, C.L., Macedo, S., Mudie, N., Panjikar, S., Price, J.R., Riboldi-Tunnicliffe, A., Rostan, R., Williamson, R. and Caradoc-Davies, T.T. (2018) MX2: a high-flux undulator microfocus beamline serving both the chemical and macromolecular crystallography communities at the Australian Synchrotron. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 25, 885891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atencio, D., Coutinho, J.M.V., Mascarenhas, Y.P. and Ellena, J.A. (2006) Matioliite, the Mg-analog of burangaite, from Gentil mine, Mendes Pimentel, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and other occurrences. American Mineralogist, 91, 19321936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruker (2001) SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Campana, B. (1957) Granites, orogenies and mineral genesis in the Olary Province (South Australia), Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 4, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černý, P. (1991) Rare element granitic pegmatites, part I. Anatomy and internal evolution of pegmatite deposits. Geoscience Canada, 18, 4967.Google Scholar
Elliott, P. and Kampf, A.R. (2020) Bimbowrieite, IMA 2020-006. CNMNC Newsletter No. 55; Mineralogical Magazine, 84, https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2020.39Google Scholar
Farrugia, L.J. (2012) WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: an update. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 45, 849854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontan, F., Pillard, F. and Permingeat, F. (1982) La natrodufrénite (Na,□) (Fe+++,Fe++)(Fe+++,Al)5(PO4)4(OH)6⋅2H2O, une nouvelle espèce minérale du groupe de la dufrénite. Bulletin de Minéralogie, 105, 321326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, O.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2015) Comprehensive derivation of bond-valence parameters for ion pairs involving oxygen. Acta Crystallographica, B71, 562578.Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. (2010) XDS. Acta Crystallographica, D66, 125132.Google Scholar
Kampf, A.R., Colombo, F. and González del Tánago, J. (2010) Gayite, a new dufrénite-group mineral from the Gigante granitic pegmatite, Córdoba province, Argentina. American Mineralogist, 95, 386391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libowitzky, E. (1999) Correlation of O-H stretching frequencies and O–H⋅⋅⋅O hydrogen bond lengths in minerals. Monatshefte für Chemie, 130, 10471059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lottermoser, B.G. and Lu, J. (1997) Petrogenesis of rare-element pegmatites in the Olary Block, South Australia, part 1. Mineralogy and chemical evolution. Mineralogy and Petrology, 59, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandarino, J.A. (2007) The Gladstone-Dale compatibility of minerals and its use for selecting mineral species for further study. The Canadian Mineralogist, 45, 13071324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.B. (1970) Crystal chemistry of the basic iron phosphates. American Mineralogist, 55, 135169.Google Scholar
Olliver, J.G. and Steveson, B.G. (1982) Pegmatites in the Olary Province. A review of feldspar and beryl mining north of Olary and the results of reconnaissance sampling of feldspar. Report 81/74. South Australian Department of Mines and Energy, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.-L., and Pichoir, F. (1991) Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP”. Pp. 3175 in: Electron Probe Quantitation (Heinrich, K.F.J. and Newbury, D.E., editors). Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, B. and Lehmann, G. (1986) Correlation of angular and bond length distortions in TO4 units in crystals. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 175, 4359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, K., Gibbs, G.V. and Ribbe, P.H. (1971) Quadratic elongation; a quantitative measure of distortion in coordination polyhedra. Science, 172, 567570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selway, J.B., Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1997) Refinement of the crystal structure of burangaite. The Canadian Mineralogist, 35, 15151522.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2015a) SHELXT – Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallographica, A71, 38.Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2015b) Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallographica, C71, 38.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of related minerals.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Greenish-brown crystals of bimbowrieite on fluorapatite, associated with ushkovite (orange) and sellaite (white). The field of view is 2.3 mm, South Australian Museum specimen G34762.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Crystal drawing of bimbowrieite (clinographic projection in standard orientation).

Figure 3

Figure 3. The FTIR spectrum of powdered bimbowrieite.

Figure 4

Table 2. Analytical data for bimbowrieite.

Figure 5

Table 3. Powder X-ray data for bimbowrieite. Only calculated lines with I ≥ 6 are listed.

Figure 6

Table 4. Crystal data, data collection and refinement details.

Figure 7

Table 5. Fractional coordinates and displacement parameters (Å2) for atoms for bimbowrieite.

Figure 8

Table 6. Selected interatomic distances (Å), angles (°) and hydrogen bonds for bimbowrieite.

Figure 9

Table 7. Bond valence* (vu) sums for bimbowrieite.

Figure 10

Figure 4. The crystal structure of bimbowrieite viewed along [010]. Hydrogen atoms are small grey spheres. The unit cell is outlined.

Supplementary material: File

Elliott and Kampf supplementary material 1

Elliott and Kampf supplementary material
Download Elliott and Kampf supplementary material 1(File)
File 151.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Elliott and Kampf supplementary material 2

Elliott and Kampf supplementary material
Download Elliott and Kampf supplementary material 2(File)
File 20.2 KB