Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 26
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Mandel, David R. and Tetlock, Philip E. 2018. Correcting Judgment Correctives in National Security Intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Irwin, Daniel and Mandel, David R. 2019. Improving information evaluation for intelligence production. Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 503.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Fan, Yuyu Budescu, David V. Mandel, David and Himmelstein, Mark 2019. Improving Accuracy by Coherence Weighting of Direct and Ratio Probability Judgments. Decision Analysis, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 197.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mandel, David R. 2019. Too soon to tell if the US intelligence community prediction market is more accurate than intelligence reports: Commentary on. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 288.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K. Belton, Ian K. and Mandel, David R. 2019. The “analysis of competing hypotheses” in intelligence analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 6, p. 1080.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Collins, Robert N. and Mandel, David R. 2019. Cultivating credibility with probability words and numbers. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 14, Issue. 6, p. 683.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Han, Ying and Budescu, David 2019. A universal method for evaluating the quality of aggregators. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 395.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Karvetski, Christopher W. Mandel, David R. and Irwin, Daniel 2020. Improving Probability Judgment in Intelligence Analysis: From Structured Analysis to Statistical Aggregation. Risk Analysis, Vol. 40, Issue. 5, p. 1040.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Arcos, Rubén and Palacios, José-Miguel 2020. EU INTCEN: a transnational European culture of intelligence analysis?. Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 72.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Karvetski, Christopher W. and Mandel, David R. 2020. Coherence of probability judgments from uncertain evidence: Does ACH help?. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 15, Issue. 6, p. 939.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mandel, David R. Collins, Robert N. Risko, Evan F. and Fugelsang, Jonathan A. 2020. Effect of confidence interval construction on judgment accuracy. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 15, Issue. 5, p. 783.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer Rossini, Patricia Kenski, Kate McKernan, Brian Clegg, Benjamin Folkestad, James Østerlund, Carsten Schooler, Lael Boichak, Olga Canzonetta, Jordan Martey, Rosa Mikeal Pavlich, Corey Tsetsi, Eric and McCracken, Nancy 2021. Flexible versus structured support for reasoning: enhancing analytical reasoning through a flexible analytic technique. Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 279.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mandel, David R. and Irwin, Daniel 2021. Tracking accuracy of strategic intelligence forecasts: Findings from a long‐term Canadian study. FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE, Vol. 3, Issue. 3-4,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Spellman, Barbara A. Eldridge, Heidi and Bieber, Paul 2022. Challenges to reasoning in forensic science decisions. Forensic Science International: Synergy, Vol. 4, Issue. , p. 100200.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Dhami, Mandeep K. Wicke, Lars and Önkal, Dilek 2022. Scenario generation and scenario quality using the cone of plausibility. Futures, Vol. 142, Issue. , p. 102995.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mandel, David R. Hendriks, Tonya L. and Irwin, Daniel 2022. Policy for promoting analytic rigor in intelligence: professionals’ views and their psychological correlates. Intelligence and National Security, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 177.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Haggit, J.M. Antonik, C. Flach, J.M. McEwen, T.R. and Smith, M.W. 2022. Joint Activity Design Evaluation Tools for Conducting Staged-World Studies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 66, Issue. 1, p. 388.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Marcoci, Alexandru Vercammen, Ans Bush, Martin Hamilton, Daniel G. Hanea, Anca Hemming, Victoria Wintle, Bonnie C. Burgman, Mark and Fidler, Fiona 2022. Reimagining peer review as an expert elicitation process. BMC Research Notes, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
MacLean, Carla L. 2022. Cognitive bias in workplace investigation: Problems, perspectives and proposed solutions. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 105, Issue. , p. 103860.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Han, Ying and Budescu, David V. 2022. Recalibrating probabilistic forecasts to improve their accuracy. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 91.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?
  • Volume 13, Issue 6
  • David R. Mandel (a1), Christopher W. Karvetski (a2) and Mandeep K. Dhami (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006628
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?
  • Volume 13, Issue 6
  • David R. Mandel (a1), Christopher W. Karvetski (a2) and Mandeep K. Dhami (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006628
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Boosting intelligence analysts’ judgment accuracy: What works, what fails?
  • Volume 13, Issue 6
  • David R. Mandel (a1), Christopher W. Karvetski (a2) and Mandeep K. Dhami (a3)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006628
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.